Search

Object Esthesioneuroblastoma (ENB) is a rare malignant neuroendocrine tumor originating from the olfactory neuroepithelium in the cribriform plate. Controversy still exists regarding the role of pathologic grading (Hyams grade) in prognostication. This study was undertaken to describe our experience with ENB and assess the role of pathologic grading in patient outcome. Methods This was a retrospective, single-institution experience, including 109 patients with ENB treated at our institution from 1962 to 2009. Multivariate analysis was performed utilizing Cox regression analysis models utilizing age, gender, modified Kadish stage, and Hyams grade. Results Mean age was 49 ± 16 (median 50) years at presentation (range 12 to 90 years). Median follow up was 5.1 years. All-cause mortality was significantly influenced by Hyams grading in univariate (p = 0.04) and multivariate (p = 0.02) analysis, in addition to proven prognostic factors, Kadish staging, lymph node metastasis, and age. Median survival was 9.8 years compared with 6.9 years with low (grade 1 to 2) versus high (grade 3 to 4) Hyams grade. Median overall survival was 7.2 ± 0.7 years. Conclusion ENB has a variable outcome, which is primarily prognosticated by the extent of involvement at presentation (Kadish stage and lymph node metastasis) and higher Hyams pathologic grade.

Objective To describe current concepts in the diagnosis and treatment of brain metastases. Results More than 25% of all autopsy-proven brain metastases have a pulmonary source. Most brain metastases manifest with a combination of focal and generalized symptoms and signs. Typically, patients have subacute, progressive symptoms. In most situations, a computed tomographic scan of the head provides sufficient neuroimaging and allows one to monitor the effects of therapy. Magnetic resonance imaging has become increasingly useful in the diagnosis and management of brain metastases. It can detect computed tomographic occult metastases, identify associated leptomeningeal disease, and reveal early therapeutic complications. Conclusion Treatment options for patients with brain metastases include corticosteroids, whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT), surgical intervention, stereotactic radiosurgical techniques, and chemotherapy. Corticosteroids produce prompt improvement in most patients; however, prolonged use is associated with considerable risks. For most patients, WBRT is the preferred treatment. Nonetheless, it has associated nonneurologic and neurologic complications, some of which are serious. In patients with a single metastasis, surgical removal should be considered. Recent studies have suggested that resection of a single metastatic lesion followed by radiation therapy offers better survival than does radiation therapy alone. The subsequent administration of WBRT after radiosurgical treatment has become standard practice. The role of chemotherapy is uncertain.

A Phase I study of rIL-2 and levamisole was performed to evaluate the activity, toxicity, and effect on immune parameters of this combination of agents in patients with advanced malignancy. Twelve patients with advanced cancer were included and begun on therapy with rIL-2, 1 x 10(6) U/m2 subcutaneously (SQ) daily for 5 days and levamisole beginning at 25 mg/m2 orally three times daily for 5 days. The dose of levamisole was increased to 50 mg/m2 thrice daily during this study. Immune parameter analysis included the percentages of lymphocyte subsets in peripheral blood, cellular cytotoxicity assays versus K562 and Daudi cells, and lymphocyte blastogenesis to the recall antigens tetanus toxoid and Candida albicans. The dose-limiting toxicities were pruritus, nausea, and facial edema. There were no indications of significant hematologic or hepatorenal toxicities. No patient fulfilled the traditional criteria for an objective response. In 8 of 9 patients with immune parameter data available there was an increase in cellular cytotoxicity and in the percentage of lymphocytes with the natural killer phenotype (CD3-, CD16/56+). This regimen can be given as an outpatient with acceptable toxicity. For Phase II investigations the doses of rIL-2, 1 x 10(6) U/m2 SQ daily x 5 days and levamisole, 50 mg/m2 three times daily x 5 days is recommended.

Glioblastoma (GBM) is a refractory malignancy. Despite surgical resection, external beam radiation therapy, and chemotherapy, median survival is only 15–18 months.1,2 There is an urgent need to develop novel therapeutic strategies for this disease. Vorinostat (suberoylanilide hydroxamic acic; MW = 264) is a linear hydroxamic acid that inhibits class I and class II histone deacetylases (HDACs),3,4 causing hyperacetylation of core histone proteins H2A, H2B, H3, and H4.5 Hyperacetylation of nuclear histones causes changes in chromatin structure that ultimately result in changes in gene expression. In addition, the acetylation state of several other proteins, including α-tubulin and hsp90, increases after treatment with vorinostat.6 The biological effects of HDAC inhibition by vorinostat are widespread. Indeed, treatment with HDAC inhibitors results in changes in 2%–10% of all expressed genes.7,8 Vorinostat and other HDAC inhibitors have demonstrated preclinical activity in a broad range of solid tumor and hematological malignancies, both in in vitro and animal models.6 Several HDAC inhibitors, including vorinostat, have demonstrated preclinical activity against GBM cell lines and glioma models.9–11 On the basis of this strong preclinical rationale, North Central Cancer Treatment Group (NCCTG) completed a phase II trial of vorinostat in patients with recurrent GBM.12 Vorinostat was well tolerated in this patient population and met its primary end point, with 9 of the first 52 patients being progression-free at 6 months (15% progression-free at 6 months [PFS6], compared with a

Infiltrating glioma is the most common class of primary brain tumor, but little is known about the factors that lead to its development. Exposure to ionizing radiation (1, 2) and history of a familial cancer such as Li-Fraumeni or Turcot syndrome are well-recognized risk factors, but they explain only a very small proportion of glioma cases. Allergy has been consistently shown to be inversely related to glioma risk (3). Although it has been long supposed that smoking could increase risk of glioma through exposure of the brain to the numerous carcinogens in tobacco smoke, a large majority of studies of this topic have shown no association (4–7). The recent genome-wide association studies of our group and another group identified inherited variants in 5 chromosomal regions associated with adult glioma risk, specifically: 5p15.3 (TERT), 8q24.21 (CCDC26/MLZE), 9p21.3 (CDKN2B), 11q23.3 (PHLDB1/DDX6), and 20q13.3 (RTEL1) (8, 9). Identification of interactions between inherited glioma risk variants and clinically apparent immune system activation, such as allergy or environmental exposures including smoking, could help to identify mechanisms of gliomagenesis. Schoemaker et al. (10) recently reported that the inverse association of allergy with glioma risk was significantly modified by glioma risk alleles on 9p21.3 (rs4977756), and 20q13.3 (rs6010620). Here, we report the main effects on high-grade glioma risk for histories of medically diagnosed allergy and smoking and assess whether known glioma risk loci modify the effects of these risk factors using data from 3 US adult glioma case-control studies.

The objective of this phase II study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of subcutaneous octreotide therapy for the treatment of recurrent meningioma and meningeal hemangiopericytoma. Octreotide is an agonist of somatostatin receptors, which are frequently expressed in meningioma, and reports have suggested that treatment with somatostatin agonists may lead to objective response in meningioma. Patients with recurrent/progressive meningioma or meningeal hemangiopericytoma were eligible for enrollment; those with atypical/anaplastic meningioma or hemangiopericytoma must have experienced disease progression despite radiotherapy or have had a contraindication to radiation. Patients received subcutaneous octreotide with a goal dose of 500 μg 3 times per day, as tolerated. Imaging was performed every 3 months during therapy. The primary outcome measure was radiographic response rate. Eleven patients with meningioma and 1 with meningeal hemangiopericytoma were enrolled during the period 1992–1998. Side effects included diarrhea (grade 1 in 4 patients and grade 2 in 2), nausea or anorexia (grade 1 in 4 patients), and transaminitis (grade 1 in 1 patient). One patient developed extra hepatic cholangiocarcinoma, which was likely unrelated to octreotide therapy. No radiographic responses were observed. Eleven of the 12 patients experienced progression, with a median time to progression of 17 weeks. Two patients experienced long progression-free intervals (30 months and ≥18 years). Eleven patients have died. Median duration of survival was 2.7 years. Immunohistochemical staining of somatostatin receptor Sstr2a expression in a subset of patients did not reveal a correlation between level of expression and length of progression-free survival. Octreotide was well-tolerated but failed to produce objective tumor response, although 2 patients experienced prolonged stability of previously progressive tumors.

Extraosseous Ewing's sarcoma (EES) involving the central nervous system is rare, but can be diagnosed and distinguished from other primitive neuroectodermal tumors (PNET) by identification of the chromosomal translocation (11;22)(q24;q12). We report EES arising from the spinal intradural extramedullary space, based on imaging, histopathological, and molecular data in two men, ages 50 and 60 years old and a review of the literature using PubMed (1970–2009). Reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) identified the fusion product FL1-EWS. Multimodal therapy, including radiation and alternating chemotherapy including vincristine, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin and ifosfamide and etoposide led to local tumor control and an initial, favorable therapeutic response. No systemic involvement was seen from the time of diagnosis to the time of last follow-up (26 months) or death (4 years). This report confirms that EES is not confined to the earliest decades of life, and like its rare occurrence as an extra-axial meningeal based mass intracranially, can occasionally present as an intradural mass in the spinal canal without evidence of systemic tumor. Gross total resection followed by multimodal therapy may provide for extended progression free and overall survival.

PURPOSE We performed a randomized trial to compare survival distributions and toxicity of radiation therapy (RT) and PCNU with those of RT and carmustine (BCNU) in patients with malignant glioma. PATIENTS AND METHODS A total of 346 patients with histologically verified supratentorial grade 3 and grade 4 astrocytoma were studied. After surgery, patients were randomly assigned to receive RT 60 Gy in 30 fractions and either PCNU 100 mg/m2 or BCNU 200 mg/m2 every 7 weeks for 1 year and every 10 weeks for the second year. RT and chemotherapy were started within 72 hours of randomization and usually on the same day. Of 334 assessable patients, 72% had partial or radical resection and 71% had grade 4 tumors. Median age was 59 years, and 85% had performance scores of 0 to 2 (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group [ECOG]). The follow-up duration of 51 living patients ranged from 10.3 to 63.2 months, with a median of 36.2 months. RESULTS The median survival duration in each group was 47 weeks, and median time to progression was 28 weeks. PCNU produced significantly more leukopenia and thrombocytopenia, whereas BCNU produced significantly more nausea, vomiting, and irritation. CONCLUSION PCNU has no therapeutic advantage at this dose and schedule and does not warrant further study as a single agent for patients with high-grade glioma.

Primary brain tumors are typically treated with a combination of surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy. While currently available treatments can be combined in countless ways and many new potential treatments are in various stages of development, there are relatively few regimens with proven efficacy against primary brain tumors of any type. The widespread use of these treatments means that clinicians are likely to encounter even rare side effects, making the evaluation and management of therapy-related toxicities a vital part of clinical practice. Chemotherapy complications tend to be acute and range in severity from mild and self-limiting to life-threatening.

Purpose: The mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) functions within the phosphoinositide 3-kinase/Akt signaling pathway as a critical modulator of cell survival. Methods: The mTOR inhibitor temsirolimus (CCI-779) was combined with chemoradiotherapy in glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) patients in a dose-escalation phase I trial. The first 12 patients were treated with CCI-779 combined with radiation/temozolomide and adjuvant temozolomide. A second cohort of 13 patients was treated with concurrent CCI-779/radiation/temozolomide followed by adjuvant temozolomide monotherapy. Results: Concomitant and adjuvant CCI-779 was associated with a high rate (3 of 12 patients) of grade 4/5 infections. By limiting CCI-779 treatment to the radiation/temozolomide phase and using antibiotic prophylaxis, the rate of infections was reduced, although 2 of 13 patients developed exacerbation of pre-existing fungal or viral infections. Dose-limiting toxicities were observed in 2 of 13 patients with this modified schedule. Weekly CCI-779 (50 mg/week) combined with radiation/temozolomide is the recommended phase II dose and schedule. The immune profile of patients in the second cohort was assessed before, during, and after CCI-779 therapy. There was robust suppression of helper and cytotoxic T cells, B cells, natural killer, cells and elevation of regulatory T cells during CCI-779/radiation/temozolomide therapy with recovery to baseline levels during adjuvant temozolomide of cytotoxic T cells, natural killer cells, and regulatory T cells. Conclusions: The increased infection rate observed with CCI-779 combined with chemoradiotherapy in GBM was reduced with antibiotic prophylaxis and by limiting the duration of CCI-779 therapy. The combined suppressive effects of CCI-779 and temozolomide therapy on discrete immune compartments likely contributed to the increased infectious risks observed. Clin Cancer Res; 16(22); 5573–80. ©2010 AACR.

Purpose In March 1998, Common Toxicity Criteria (CTC) version 2.0 introduced the collection of attribution of adverse events (AEs) to study drug. We investigate whether attribution adds value to the interpretation of AE data. Patients and Methods Patients in the placebo arm of two phase III trials—North Central Cancer Treatment Group Trial 97-24-51 (carboxyamino-triazole v placebo in advanced non–small-cell lung cancer) and American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Trial Z9001 (imatinib mesylate v placebo after resection of primary gastrointestinal stromal tumors)—were studied. Attribution was categorized as unrelated (not related or unlikely) and related (possible, probable, or definite). Results In total, 398 patients (84 from Trial 97-24-51 and 314 from Trial Z9001) and 7,736 AEs were included; 47% and 50% of the placebo-arm AEs, respectively, were reported as related. When the same AE was reported in the same patient on multiple visits, the attribution category changed at least once 36% and 31% of the time. AE type and sex (Trial Z9001) and AE type and performance status (Trial 97-24-51) were associated with a higher likelihood of AEs being deemed related. Conclusion Nearly 50% of AEs were reported as attributed to study drug on the placebo arm of two randomized clinical trials. These data provide strong evidence that AE attribution is difficult to determine, unreliable, and of questionable value in interpreting AE data in randomized clinical trials.

Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is the most common primary malignant brain tumor and represents one of the toughest therapeutic challenges in oncology. On recurrence after radiation therapy and temozolomide, median survival historically has ranged from 4 to 7 months. Interest in antiangiogenic approaches in the treatment of gliomas was founded on preclinical work demonstrating the dependency of these tumors on intense angiogenic activity, and culminated with the recent accelerated approval of the anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) –A humanized monoclonal antibody, bevacizumab, in May 2009 in the United States. This approval was based on the durable progression-free survival (PFS; range, 3.9 to 4.2 months) and response rate (range, 19.6% to 25.9%) observed in patients with recurrent GBM treated with bevacizumab monotherapy. However, the modest median overall survival (OS) of 7.8 to 9.2 months highlights the need for further improvement of efficacy. Several ongoing phase II/III investigations testing large molecule VEGF inhibitors (bevacizumab, aflibercept), or small molecule kinase or integrin inhibitors (such as enzastaurin, cediranib, pazopanib, sorafenib, sunitinib, vandetanib, XL-184, dasatinib, cilengitide) are in progress, both in the newly diagnosed and recurrent disease setting. Many of these clinical trials are testing combination regimens with antiangiogenesis agents to determine the optimal incorporation of angiogenesis inhibition in GBM treatment and to prevent or overcome the development of bevacizumab resistance. In this issue of Journal of Clinical Oncology, Wick et al report on the results of a randomized phase III trial of enzastaurin versus lomustine, a nitrosourea commonly employed in this setting, in patients with recurrent GBM. Enrollment was terminated at 266 patients after a planned interim analysis for futility. Despite excellent trial design and conduct, results were disappointing. Median PFS (1.5 v 1.6 months; hazard ratio, 1.28), the trial’s primary end point, 6-month PFS (11.1% v 19%; P .03), and OS (6.6 v 7.1 months; hazard ratio, 1.2) did not differ significant between the enzastaurin and lomustine arms. Objective response was observed in 2.9% and 4.3% of the patients, respectively. Enzastaurin is a potent and selective inhibitor of protein kinase C (PKC) . Binding of the VEGF-A ligand with the VEGF receptor (VEGFR) 2/Flk-1/KDR high affinity receptor is thought to represent the most important ligand/receptor interaction regulating glioma angiogenesis, and PKCmediates VEGFR2 signaling through MEK and MAP kinase activation. Furthermore, by being downstream of phosphoinositide-3-kinase (PI3K) and by activating Akt through phosphorylation, PKCinteracts with the phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN)/PI3K/Akt pathway, another key signaling pathway in gliomagenesis. After promising preclinical data demonstrating antiangiogenic and antiproliferative effects in glioma models at clinically achievable concentrations, a phase II trial of enzastaurin in heavily pretreated patients with recurrent GBM showed an objective radiographic response rate of 26% at the interim analysis, and the phase III trial was activated. Despite the strong preclinical rationale and a promising response rate in a single institution phase II trial, why did enzastaurin fail to fulfill its promise in the phase III setting? One possibility could be that drug concentrations sufficient to block the target pathway and inhibit angiogenesis were not achieved in the CNS tumors, despite the fact that the enzastaurin dose utilized was known to produce a biologically active concentration in plasma. Higher doses would not likely have been feasible since a phase I trial attempting to escalate the enzastaurin dose resulted in significant hematologic toxicity. The very low objective response rate (2.9%) to enzastaurin observed in this phase III trial supports this hypothesis. Even in the absence of a significant antitumor effect, one would have expected decreased contrast enhancement on magnetic resonance imaging as a consequence of reduced vascular permeability associated with VEGFR2 inhibition, if enzastaurin had been able to block VEGFR2 signaling in the recurrent GBM tumors. Given the importance of drug delivery, trials of neoadjuvant administration of novel therapeutic agents before surgery with subsequent assessment of the drug effect in the surgical specimen, or use of functional imaging when applicable, to assess target inhibition, as part of the early development steps of novel antiglioma agents remain important. Another possibility pertains to complementary angiogenesis pathways, bypassing PKC inhibition and negating its antitumor effect in patients. VEGF-A ligand binding to other receptors, such as VEGFR1/Flt-1, and VEGFR2 signaling, via a nonPKC –dependent pathway, such as T-cell–specific adaptor/VEGFR-associated protein or fibroblast growth factor 2 upregulation, at the presence of enzastaurin could represent such alternatives. Overlapping molecular pathways could also have negated the effect of an enzastaurinmediated decrease in Akt phosphorylation/activation of the P13K/Akt pathway. The overlapping molecular networks driving glioma proliferation help explain why less-specific targeted agents might be associated with higher antitumor activity. The two further developed antiangiogenesis agents in glioma treatment are either targeting the VEGF ligand (bevacizumab), or in the case of the tyrosine kinase inhibitor cediranib (response rate, 56%; PFS at 6 months, 26%) are blocking multiple angiogenesis related receptor kinases (VEGFR2, VEGFR1, VEGFR3, c-Kit, platelet-derived growth factor receptor), with the inhibitory signaling still predominantly occurring via VEGFR2. Independent of possible explanations regarding the negative outcome of this phase III trial, this study underscores one of the major current challenges in glioma therapeutics—what should be the criteria justifying phase III testing of a novel antitumor agent? Although the final analysis of the phase II single-agent enzastaurin trial has not been published yet, as Wick et al discuss, a median PFS of 1.3 months, a 6-month PFS of 7%, and median OS of 4.4 months was observed in Editorials

N9741 is a clinical trial in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer that was originally written in 1997 and completed patient accrual in 2004. One thousand seven hundred thirty-one patients were enrolled in the study. During the conduct of the trial, N9741 was repeatedly modified to adapt to toxicity findings, to add evaluation of oxaliplatin to what was originally a trial examining various schedules of irinotecan-based therapy, and to ask evolving questions. The trial led to a new U.S. Food and Drug Administration indication for 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin as indicated for the treatment of previously untreated patients with metastatic colorectal cancer and helped to change the standard of care for the disease in the U.S. and worldwide. The data from the trial have been used to study multiple regimens, pharmacogenetics, and quality of life issues, to correlate plasma protein levels with outcomes, to inform trial methodology, and to perform economic analyses. To date nearly 30 papers and an even larger number of abstracts have been based upon data arising from the study. The history of the trial and the major findings are summarized in this review.

Purpose Vorinostat, a histone deacetylase inhibitor, represents a rational therapeutic target in glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). Patients and Methods Patients with recurrent GBM who had received one or fewer chemotherapy regimens for progressive disease were eligible. Vorinostat was administered at a dose of 200 mg orally twice a day for 14 days, followed by a 7-day rest period. Results A total of 66 patients were treated. Grade 3 or worse nonhematologic toxicity occurred in 26% of patients and consisted mainly of fatigue (17%), dehydration (6%), and hypernatremia (5%); grade 3 or worse hematologic toxicity occurred in 26% of patients and consisted mainly of thrombocytopenia (22%). Pharmacokinetic analysis showed lower vorinostat maximum concentration and area under the curve (0 to 24 hours) values in patients treated with enzyme-inducing anticonvulsants, although this did not reach statistical significance. The trial met the prospectively defined primary efficacy end point, with nine of the first 52 patients being progression-free at 6 months. Median overall survival from study entry was 5.7 months (range, 0.7 to 28+ months). Immunohistochemical analysis performed in paired baseline and post-vorinostat treatment samples in a separate surgical subgroup of five patients with recurrent GBM showed post treatment increase in acetylation of histones H2B and H4 (four of five patients) and of histone H3 (three of five patients). Microarray RNA analysis in the same samples showed changes in genes regulated by vorinostat, such as upregulation of E-cadherin (P = .02). Conclusion Vorinostat monotherapy is well tolerated in patients with recurrent GBM and has modest single-agent activity. Histone acetylation analysis and RNA expression profiling indicate that vorinostat in this dose and schedule affects target pathways in GBM. Additional testing of vorinostat in combination regimens is warranted.

Margaret Wrensch and colleagues report a genome-wide association and replication study for high-grade glioma. They show that common variants in the CDKN2B and RTEL1 regions are associated with risk of this aggressive brain tumor. The causes of glioblastoma and other gliomas remain obscure1,2. To discover new candidate genes influencing glioma susceptibility, we conducted a principal component–adjusted3 genome-wide association study (GWAS) of 275,895 autosomal variants among 692 adult high-grade glioma cases (622 from the San Francisco Adult Glioma Study (AGS) and 70 from the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA))4 and 3,992 controls (602 from AGS and 3,390 from Illumina iControlDB (iControls)). For replication, we analyzed the 13 SNPs with P < 10−6 using independent data from 176 high-grade glioma cases and 174 controls from the Mayo Clinic. On 9p21, rs1412829 near CDKN2B had discovery P = 3.4 × 10−8, replication P = 0.0038 and combined P = 1.85 × 10−10. On 20q13.3, rs6010620 intronic to RTEL1 had discovery P = 1.5 × 10−7, replication P = 0.00035 and combined P = 3.40 × 10−9. For both SNPs, the direction of association was the same in discovery and replication phases.

An oral formulation of temsirolimus (Torisel®), an inhibitor of the mammalian target of rapamycin, was evaluated on an intermittent schedule (once daily for 5 days every 2 weeks) in patients with advanced cancer. The maximum tolerated dose was determined to be 75 mg after dose-limiting toxicities of grade 3 elevated aminotransferases (1 patient) and grade 3 rash (1 patient) occurred with a 100-mg dose. The most common temsirolimus-related adverse events were mucositis, rash/maculopapular rash, and asthenia. Six of 12 patients who received the 75-mg dose required dose reductions due to temsirolimus-related adverse events. Two patients who received 75-mg temsirolimus and did not have dose reductions had minor tumor responses. Relative exposure from contributions of both temsirolimus and sirolimus, the principal metabolite, was 17.9% of the 75-mg dose. Thus, oral temsirolimus, 75 mg administered once daily for 5 days every 2 weeks, was further evaluated in patients with metastatic breast cancer.

To assess whether chemosensitivity in metastatic soft tissue sarcoma (STS) is influenced by the histologic grade of the tumor, the authors retrospectively analyzed tumor responses to doxorubicin-based chemotherapy in four prospective studies conducted at the Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, between 1976 and 1984. A total of 131 patients with metastatic STS were included in these trials. All pathologic material was reviewed by one pathologist (H. M. R.) and graded according to the four-tier grading system of Broders. One hundred and sixteen patients were accepted for analysis. Objective regression rates according to grade were as follows: Grade 4, 55% (22 of 40 patients); Grade 3, 23% (7 of 31 patients); Grade 2, 19% (5 of 27 patients); and Grade 1, 0% (0 of 3 patients). Fifteen nongradable sarcomas were analyzed separately (27% [4 of 15]). In contrast to several reports suggesting that grade does not effect response, the authors found differences in response rates to be statistically significant for Grade 2 versus Grade 4 (P = 0.003) and Grade 3 versus Grade 4 (P = 0.006), but not for Grade 2 versus Grade 3 (P = 0.7). Additional comparisons adjusted for the histologic type of STS, chemotherapeutic regimen, performance status, age, and prior treatment confirmed these results. These results suggested that, in addition to being an important prognostic factor for survival in newly diagnosed STS, histologic grade may correlate with the probability of response and should be considered a stratification factor in future studies. Cancer 68:2354–2358, 1991.

Purpose The aims of this trial were to assess the safety and efficacy of two different dosing schedules of irinotecan (CPT-11) in recurrent glioma patients, to assess irinotecan pharmacokinetics in patients on enzyme-inducing antiepileptic drugs (EIAEDs) and steroids, and to correlate with toxicity and response to treatment. Methods Sixty-four recurrent glioma patients were included in this study. Schedule A patients received irinotecan weekly (125 mg/m2/w) for four out of six weeks. Schedule B patients received irinotecan every three weeks at a dose of 300 mg/m2. A 20% dose reduction was implemented for patients who had received prior nitrosureas. Treatment was continued until unacceptable toxicity, tumor progression or patient withdrawal. Results There was no difference in confirmed responses between the two groups (6.3%). PFS at 6 months was 6.25% (2/32 patients) on schedule A and 18.75% (6/32 patients) on schedule B but median OS (5.1 versus 5.5 months), and survival at one year (19%) was similar for both arms. The most common grade 3–4 toxicities on schedules A/B were: thrombocytopenia (15.6%/21.9%), diarrhea (6.3%/12.5%) and nausea and vomiting (0%/15.7%). One toxic death due to infection in the absence of neutropenia occurred in schedule B. EIAEDs reduced SN-38 and CPT-11 area under the curve and increased CPT-11 cleareance. This effect was more prominent in schedule A patients. Steroids did not alter CPT-11 pharmacokinetics in either schedule. Conclusions Single agent irinotecan has modest activity in patients with recurrent gliomas, independently of the administration schedule. Irinotecan administration on an every 3 week schedule resulted in longer PFS-6, at the expense of more toxicity. EIAEDs alter CPT-11 pharmacokinetics in this group of patients, and should be taken into consideration when determining optimal dosing.

In 1998, the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group initiated a Phase II study of observation for adults40 years old with cerebral low-grade glioma who underwent a neurosurgeon-determined gross-total resection (GTR).Patient eligibility criteria included the presence of a World Health Organization Grade II astrocytoma, oligodendroglioma, or mixed oligoastrocytoma confirmed histologically; age 18-39 years; Karnofsky Performance Scale scoreor = 60; Neurologic Function Scale scoreor = 3; supratentorial tumor location; neurosurgeon-determined GTR; and pre- and postoperative MR imaging with contrast enhancement available for central review by the principal investigator. Patients were observed following GTR and underwent MR imaging every 6 months. Prognostic factors analyzed for their contribution to patient overall survival, progression-free survival (PFS), and tumor recurrence included age, sex, Karnofsky Performance Scale score, Neurologic Function Scale score, histological type, contrast enhancement on preoperative MR imaging, preoperative tumor diameter, residual disease based on postoperative MR imaging, and baseline Mini-Mental State Examination score.Between 1998 and 2002, 111 eligible patients were entered into the study. In these 111 patients, the overall survival rates at 2 and 5 years were 99 and 93%, respectively. The PFS rates in these 111 patients at 2 and 5 years were 82 and 48%, respectively. Three prognostic factors predicted significantly poorer PFS in univariate and multivariate analyses: 1) preoperative tumor diameteror = 4 cm; 2) astrocytoma/oligoastrocytoma histological type; and 3) residual tumoror = 1 cm according to MR imaging. Review of the postoperative MR imaging results revealed that 59% of patients had1 cm residual disease (with a subsequent 26% recurrence rate), 32% had 1-2 cm residual disease (with a subsequent 68% recurrence rate), and 9% had2 cm residual disease (with a subsequent 89% recurrence rate).These data suggest that young adult patients with low-grade glioma who undergo a neurosurgeon-determined GTR have a50% risk of tumor progression 5-years postoperatively, warranting close follow-up and consideration for adjuvant treatment.

CpG methylation within the O6-methylguanine-DNA-methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter is associated with enhanced survival of glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) patients treated with temozolomide (TMZ). Although MGMT promoter is methylated in ~50% of GBM, several studies have reported a lack of correlation between MGMT methylation and protein expression levels and consequently inaccurate discrimination of TMZ sensitive and resistant patients. To understand the limitations of currently used assays, TMZ responsiveness of 13 GBM xenograft lines was correlated with MGMT protein expression and MGMT promoter methylation determined by (1) standard methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction (MS–PCR), (2) quantitative MS–PCR (qMS–PCR), and (3) bisulfite sequencing. For each xenograft line, mice with established intracranial xenografts were treated with vehicle control or TMZ (66 mg/kg × 5 days), and TMZ response was defined as relative prolongation in median survival for TMZ-treated versus control-treated mice. The relative survival benefit with TMZ was inversely related to MGMT protein expression (r = −0.75; P = 0.003) and directly correlated with qMS–PCR (r = 0.72; P = 0.006). There was a direct correlation between MGMT methylation signal by qMS–PCR and the number of methylated CpG sites within the region amplified by MS–PCR (r = 0.78, P = 0.002). However, bisulfite sequencing revealed heterogeneity in the extent of CpG methylation in those tumors with a robust qMS–PCR signal. Three of the 4 GBM lines with a qMS–PCR signal greater than 10% had at least 1 unmethylated CpG site, while only one line was fully methylated at all 12 CpG sites. These data highlight one potential limitation of the evaluation of MGMT methylation by MS–PCR assay and suggest that more detailed evaluation of methylation at individual CpG sites relative to TMZ response may be worth pursuing.

Background Esthesioneuroblastoma (ENB) is a rare tumor arising from the olfactory epithelium in the upper nasal cavity. Prior reviews have found efficacy of chemotherapy for high grade tumors in the advanced setting. However, little information is available regarding chemotherapy in the adjuvant setting. Methods A retrospective review of 76 patients treated at the Mayo Clinic for esthesioneuroblastoma from 1976 to 2003 was performed to evaluate adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) in these patients. Pathology slides were reviewed to assign Hyam’s grade, and modified Kadish staging was available for all patients used in the analysis. Results Twelve patients were identified to have had full surgical resection of Stage C, high grade (grade 3 or 4) tumors. Six of these patients received AC, and six did not. Most AC was cisplatin and etoposide based. Median time to relapse for patients who did and did not receive AC is 35 and 10.5 months respectively. The median overall survival (OS) for patients that received AC was 83+ (range 21–119+ months). The median OS for patients not receiving AC is 78 months (range 9–240+ months). Conclusions This small retrospective series suggests that adjuvant therapy for patients with high grade, Stage C esthesioneuroblastoma is of benefit following complete resection. Radiation therapy alone provides an improvement in time to relapse, which may be increased further with the addition of cisplatin and etoposide based chemotherapy.

Metastatic lesions to the brain occur commonly in oncology patients and portend a very poor outcome, as they often occur in the setting of progressive systemic metastatic disease and can result in neurologic deterioration that may preclude therapy. Therapy of patients with brain metastases requires a combination of measures to achieve local control at the site of metastasis (e.g., with surgical resection or radiosurgery) and to reduce the subsequent risk of recurrences elsewhere in the brain (e.g., with whole-brain radiation). Successful therapy of extracranial systemic metastases is required for optimal outcomes. Clinical trials are currently underway to define the optimal role of whole-brain radiation and radiosurgery in different subsets of patients. Novel therapies to enhance radiation responsiveness are also under investigation. In the current review, we discuss recent developments in the management of patients with brain metastases.

Common end points for phase II trials in patients with glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) are six-month progression-free survival (PFS6) and 12-month overall survival (OS12). OS12 can be accurately measured but may be confounded with subsequent therapies upon progression, whereas the converse is true for PFS6. Our goal was to assess the relationship between these end points separately for phase II trials in patients with newly diagnosed GBM and patients with recurrent GBM. Data were pooled from 11 North Central Cancer Treatment Group trials for patients with newly diagnosed GBM (n = 1348). All patients received radiotherapy and pharmaceutical therapy (before, during, or after radiotherapy). Data were pooled from 16 trials that used various pharmaceuticals in treating patients for recurrent GBM (n = 345). All trial regimens were declared nonefficacious by predefined criteria. Overall per-patient concordance was estimated with a kappa statistic. The relationship between OS12 and PFS6 across study arms was assessed by weighted linear regression and Pearson’s correlation. Simulation was used to determine the agreement of study outcomes when using PFS6 versus OS12 end points. Cox models with progression status as a time-dependent variable and Kaplan-Meier estimators were used to ascertain the association between progression-free survival status and overall survival. At present, 97% of the patients with newly diagnosed GBM and 95% of those with recurrent GBM have died. The PFS6 and OS12 were 43% and 41%, respectively, for patients with newly diagnosed disease and 9% and 14% for patients with recurrent disease. There was only moderate concordance between the end points on both the patient level and the study level. For the simulation studies, we established phase II efficacy criteria for each end point by using the pooled estimates of OS12 (PFS6) as historical controls. The study decisions made using PFS6 and OS12 were in agreement 88% and 90% of the time for the trials of newly diagnosed and recurrent disease, respectively. Finally, there was a strong association between progression-free survival status and overall survival. PFS6 seems to be a reasonable end point for phase II trials in patients with recurrent glioblastoma.

LBA4 Background: WBRT significantly improves tumor control in the brain after SRS, yet the role of adjuvant WBRT remains undefined due to concerns regarding neurocognitive risks. Methods: Patients with 1-3 brain metastases, each < 3 cm by contrast MRI, were randomized to SRS alone or SRS + WBRT and underwent cognitive testing before and after treatment. The primary endpoint was cognitive progression (CP) defined as decline > 1 SD from baseline in any of the 6 cognitive tests at 3 months. Time to CP was estimated using cumulative incidence adjusting for survival as a competing risk. Results: 213 patients were enrolled with 2 ineligible and 3 cancels prior to receiving treatment. Baseline characteristics were well-balanced between study arms. The median age was 60 and lung primary the most common (68%). CP at 3 months was more frequent after WBRT + SRS vs. SRS alone (88.0% vs. 61.9% respectively, p = 0.002). There was more deterioration in the WBRT + SRS arm in immediate recall (31% vs. 8%, p = 0.007), delayed recall (51% vs. 20%, p = 0.002), and verbal fluency (19% vs. 2%, p = 0.02). Intracranial tumor control at 6 and 12 months were 66.1% and 50.5% with SRS alone vs. 88.3% and 84.9% with SRS+WBRT (p < 0.001). Median OS was 10.7 for SRS alone vs. 7.5 months for SRS+WBRT respectively (HR = 1.02, p = 0.93). Conclusions: Decline in cognitive function, specifically immediate recall, memory and verbal fluency, was more frequent with the addition of WBRT to SRS. Adjuvant WBRT did not improve OS despite better brain control. Initial treatment with SRS and close monitoring is recommended to better preserve cognitive function in patients with newly diagnosed brain metastases that are amenable to SRS. Clinical trial information: NCT00377156.

2013 Background: Dasatinib is a potent oral ATP competitive multi-targeted kinase inhibitor of multiple members of the Src kinase family known to be involved in gliomagenesis, tumor invasion, and r...

2004 Background: Preclinical data indicate that Src kinase signaling is markedly upregulated at the invasive GBM front following administration of the anti-VEGF antibody bevacizumab (Bev). The broa...

Purpose There is growing recognition that the primary cause of cognitive deficits in adult patients with primary brain tumors is the tumor itself and more significantly, tumor progression. To assess the cognitive performance of high-grade glioma patients, prospectively collected cognitive performance data were analyzed. Patients and Methods We studied 1,244 high-grade brain tumor patients entered onto eight consecutive North Central Cancer Treatment Group treatment trials that used radiation and nitrosourea-based chemotherapy. Imaging studies and Folstein Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) scores recorded at baseline, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months were analyzed to assess tumor status and cognitive function over time. Results The proportion of patients without tumor progression who experienced clinically significant cognitive deterioration compared with baseline was stable at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months (18%, 16%, 14%, and 13%, respectively). In patients without radiographic evidence of progression, clinically significant deterioration in MMSE scores was a strong predictor of a more rapid time to tumor progression and death. At evaluations preceding interval radiographic evidence of progression, there was significant deterioration in MMSE scores for patients who were to experience progression, whereas the scores remained stable for the patients who did not have tumor progression. Conclusion The proportion of high-grade glioma patients with cognitive deterioration over time is stable, most consistent with the constant pressure of tumor progression over time. Although other factors may contribute to cognitive decline, the predominant cause of cognitive decline seems to be subclinical tumor progression that precedes radiographic changes.

Anaplastic oligoastrocytomas (AOA) are relatively uncommon high-grade gliomas. While oligodendroglial elements are thought to be associated with better outcomes, the magnitude of the difference is not clear. Between 1980 and 1999, Mayo Clinic and the NCCTG conducted 10 trials of radiation therapy and chemotherapy in adults with newly-diagnosed high-grade gliomas. All pathology slides were reviewed by one of the authors (BWS or CG). We grouped patients by cell type and grade, compared survival distributions by the log-rank statistic, and performed multiple variable analyses. Of 1368 patients, 68 (5%) had AOA, including 21 Grade 3 (OA3) and 47 grade 4 (OA4), 153 (11%) had anaplastic astrocytoma (AA), and 1147 (84%) had glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). Patients with OA3 survived significantly longer than those with OA4 (P = 0.0001) or AA (P = 0.0044). Patients with OA4 lived significantly longer than those with GBM (P = 0.0005). The same differences were noted for PFS. Prognostic factors for survival identified by multiple variable analysis were histology, age, ECOG performance score, and extent of surgical resection, but not treatment administered. Patients with anaplastic oligoastrocytoma have distinct outcomes based upon grade (OA3 vs. OA4) and in comparison with pure astrocytoma (AA or GBM). Future trials which include more than one histologic entity need to report results by cell type and grade and account for the varying prognoses in interpreting treatment outcomes.

Combined deletion of chromosomes 1p and 19q is associated with improved prognosis and responsiveness to therapy in patients with anaplastic oligodendroglioma. The deletions usually involve whole chromosome arms, suggesting a t(1;19)(q10;p10). Using stem cell medium, we cultured a few tumors. Paraffin-embedded tissue was obtained from 21 Mayo Clinic patients and 98 patients enrolled in 2 North Central Cancer Treatment Group (NCCTG) low-grade glioma trials. Interphase fusion of CEP1 and 19p12 probes detected the t(1;19). 1p/19q deletions were evaluated by fluorescence in situ hybridization. Upon culture, one oligodendroglioma contained an unbalanced 45,XX,t(1;19)(q10;p10). CEP1/19p12 fusion was observed in all metaphases and 74% of interphase nuclei. Among Mayo Clinic oligodendrogliomas, the prevalence of fusion was 81%. Among NCCTG patients, CEP1/19p12 fusion prevalence was 55%, 47%, and 0% among the oligodendrogliomas, mixed oligoastrocytomas, and astrocytomas, respectively. Ninety-one percent of NCCTG gliomas with 1p/19q deletion and 12% without 1p/19q deletion had CEP1/19p12 fusion (P < 0.001, χ2 test). The median overall survival (OS) for all patients was 8.1 years without fusion and 11.9 years with fusion (P = 0.003). The median OS for patients with low-grade oligodendroglioma was 9.1 years without fusion and 13.0 years with fusion (P = 0.01). Similar significant median OS differences were observed for patients with combined 1p/19q deletions. The absence of alterations was associated with a significantly shorter OS for patients who received higher doses of radiotherapy. Our results strongly suggest that a t(1;19)(q10;p10) mediates the combined 1p/19q deletion in human gliomas. Like combined 1p/19q deletion, the 1;19 translocation is associated with superior OS and progression-free survival in low-grade glioma patients. (Cancer Res 2006; 66(20): 9852-61)

To examine the outcomes of patients with histologically confirmed central neurocytomas.The data from 45 patients with central neurocytomas diagnosed between 1971 and 2003 were retrospectively evaluated. Various combinations of surgery, radiotherapy (RT), and chemotherapy had been used for treatment.The median follow-up was 10.0 years. The 10-year overall survival and local control rate was 83% and 60%, respectively. Patients whose tumor had a mitotic index of3 (per 10 high-power fields) experienced a 10-year survival and local control rate of 89% and 74%, respectively, compared with 57% (p = 0.040) and 46% (p = 0.14) for patients with a tumor mitotic index ofor =3. The 10-year survival and local control rate was 90% and 74% for patients with typical tumors compared with 63% (p = 0.055) and 46% (p = 0.41) for those with atypical tumors. A comparison of gross total resection with subtotal resection showed no significant difference in survival or local control. Postoperative RT improved local control at 10 years (75% with RT vs. 51% without RT, p = 0.045); however, this did not translate into a survival benefit. No 1p19q deletions were found in the 19 tumors tested.Although the overall prognosis is quite favorable, one-third of patients experienced tumor recurrence or progression at 10 years, regardless of the extent of the initial resection. Postoperative RT significantly improved local control but not survival, most likely because of the effectiveness of salvage RT. For incompletely resected atypical tumors and/or those with a high mitotic index, consideration should be given to adjuvant RT because of the more aggressive nature.

Purpose In patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme, to determine whether cisplatin plus carmustine (BCNU) administered before and concurrently with radiation therapy (RT) improves survival compared with BCNU and RT and whether survival using accelerated RT (ART) is equivalent to survival using standard RT (SRT). Patients and Methods After surgery, patients were stratified by age, performance score, extent of surgical resection, and histology (glioblastoma v gliosarcoma) and then randomly assigned to arm A (BCNU plus SRT), arm B (BCNU plus ART), arm C (cisplatin plus BCNU plus SRT), or arm D (cisplatin plus BCNU plus ART). Results Four hundred fifty-one patients were randomly assigned, and 401 were eligible. Frequent toxicities included myelosuppression, vomiting, sensory neuropathy, and ototoxicity and were worse with cisplatin. There was no difference in toxicity between SRT and ART. Median survival times and 2-year survival rates for patients who received BCNU plus RT (arms A and B) compared with cisplatin, BCNU, and RT (arms C and D) were 10.1 v 11.5 months, respectively, and 11.5% v 13.7%, respectively (P = .19). Median survival times and 2-year survival rates for patients who received SRT (arms A and C) compared with ART (arms B and D) were 11.2 v 10.5 months, respectively, and 13.8% v 11.4%, respectively (P = .33). Conclusion Cisplatin administered concurrently with BCNU and RT resulted in more toxicity but provided no significant improvement in survival. SRT and ART produced similar toxicity and survival.

Oligodendroglioma frequently (≥ 70%) responds to radiation and chemotherapy, and is the first CNS neoplasm in which a genetic signature (1p and 19q deletion) has been associated with outcome within the context of large clinical trials. Current translational investigations focus on deletions or mutations of potential tumor suppressor genes, epigenetic alterations, amplification or mutation of growth factor and regulatory genes, and characterization of signaling events and regulatory protein expression. The most compelling data has involved 1p and 19q loss, which is observed in over 50% of anaplastic oligodendrogliomas. In two randomized phase III trials (Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 9402 and European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer 26951), the addition of neoadjuvant or adjuvant procarbazine, lomustine, and vincristine (PCV; respectively) to radiotherapy did not produce superior survival as compared with radiotherapy alone. A modest increase in progression-free survival was observed with the addition of PCV, but at the cost of increased toxicity. Combined 1p and 19q loss identified a favorable prognostic group in both studies, which appeared to be independent of treatment arms. However, it is unclear whether these deletions represent surrogate markers of a favorable biologic tumor behavior, or are predictive of outcome after specific treatment. Currently, there is insufficient data to allow therapeutic decisions to be made solely on the basis of 1p and 19q gene deletion status. Future phase III trials are evaluating other chemotherapeutic and targeted agents, including temozolomide, and include correlative investigations of aberrant molecular events in these neoplasms, which may lead to future therapeutic strategies that are based on specific molecular signatures.

Background: Severe myelosuppression (MS) and bone marrow failure (BMF) are rare but well characterized adverse effect of temozolomide (TMZ). The existing literature is limited to case reports and data reported to regulatory agencies, which usually describe very severe cases and lack long term and detailed follow-up. Methods: We identified cases of myelosuppression attributed to TMZ seen at the Mayo clinic, from 1998-2014. We also performed a literature (PubMed) search to identify published cases of TMZ induced MS and BMF. TMZ induced MS was defined as a decrease in at least 2 cell lines below normal that was clinically attributable to TMZ and persisted for > 28 days after the last TMZ dose. Severe MS was defined as bone marrow cellularity of Results: A total of 15 Mayo patients and 10 published cases were identified. The baseline characteristics of patients are shown in table 1. The median interval between initiation of TMZ and diagnosis of MS was 48 days (range 26-121). The hematologic outcomes of the group are shown in table 2. Seventeen patients developed neutropenic fever, 4 had severe sepsis, and 6 experienced bleeding complications. Kaplan-Meier recovery curves for each cell line are shown in the figure. Myelosuppression was fatal in 3 cases. Most patients recovered their ANC (median-62 days, range 28-180). Persistent thrombocytopenia was seen in 19 patients, without evidence for clonal evolution or myelodysplasia. Four patients remain dependent on growth factor support (G-CSF and thrombopoietin agonists). Conclusion: MS is usually a non-fatal complication of TMZ. Most cell lines recover spontaneously and adequately with the exception of platelets, which can remain significantly suppressed for prolonged periods. Infectious complications are very common. Most patients respond to supportive care, including the use of growth factors. Figure 3 Figure 3. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Purpose: To evaluate the toxicity and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of erlotinib plus radiation therapy (RT) in patients with glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) in a multicenter phase I trial. Methods and Materials: Patients were stratified on the basis of the use of enzyme-inducing anticonvulsants (EIACs). After resection or biopsy, patients were treated with erlotinib for 1 week before concurrent erlotinib and 6 weeks (60 Gy) of RT and maintained on erlotinib until progression. The erlotinib dose was escalated in cohorts of 3 starting at 100 mg/day. Results: Twenty patients were enrolled and 19 were evaluable for the MTD and efficacy endpoints. Of these patients, 14 were males and 5 were females, with a median age of 54 years. Seven had undergone biopsy only, 5 had subtotal resections, and 7 had gross total resections. The highest dose level was 150 mg/day erlotinib for patients not on EIACs (Group 1) and 200 mg/day for patients on EIACs (Group 2). MTD was not reached in either group. In Group 1 at 100 mg ( n = 6) and at 150 mg ( n = 4), only 1 dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) occurred (stomatitis at 100 mg). No DLTs have occurred in Group 2 at 100 mg ( n = 3), 150 mg ( n = 3), and 200 mg ( n = 3). With a median follow-up of 52 weeks, progression was documented in 16 patients and 13 deaths occurred. Median time to progression was 26 weeks, and median survival was 55 weeks. Conclusion: Toxicity is acceptable at the current doses of erlotinib plus RT. The study was modified to include concurrent and adjuvant temozolomide, and accrual is in progress.

We present guidelines to standardize the reporting of phase 1 and phase 2 neuro-oncology trials. The guidelines are also intended to assist with accurate interpretation of results from these trials, to facilitate the peer-review process, and to expedite the publication of important and accurate manuscripts. Our guidelines are summarized in a checklist format that can be used as a framework from which to construct a phase 1 or 2 clinical trial.

To assess baseline quality of life (QOL) and its prognostic importance for adults with newly diagnosed high-grade gliomas, we analyzed QOL and outcome data prospectively collected in three phase II high-grade glioma protocols. At study entry, patients completed five self-administered forms to assess overall QOL (linear analogue scale assessment [LASA] and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Brain [FACT-Br]); fatigue (Symptom Distress Scale [SDS]); excessive daytime somnolence (Epworth Sleepiness Scale [ESS]); and depression (POMS-SF). Folstein Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance scores (PS) were obtained by the health care provider. Baseline QOL data were available for 194 of 220 patients (88%) enrolled in the three protocols. Differences in baseline QOL among the three studies were not statistically significant. One-third of patients had clinically significant fatigue at baseline. Increased fatigue (P = 0.003), excessive daytime somnolence (P = 0.01), and lower overall QOL scores (LASA, P = 0.001; FACT-Br, P = 0.0001) correlated with worse ECOG PS. No relation was found between QOL and corticosteroid or anticonvulsant therapy, extent of resection, tumor grade, or sex. Multivariate analyses found worse ECOG PS (PS 2, P = 0.007) associated with increased fatigue. Worse ECOG PS (PS 2, P = 0.002) was also associated with worse overall QOL (LASA). On multivariate analyses of survival, increased fatigue (P = 0.003) predicted poorer overall survival. Performance status is related to QOL in patients with newly diagnosed high-grade brain tumors. Increased fatigue is an independent predictor of overall survival. Interventional studies directed at improving QOL, especially fatigue, may have important benefits for these patients.

Background Temsirolimus (CCI-779) is a small-molecule inhibitor of the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) and represents a rational therapeutic target against glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). Methods Recurrent GBM patients with ≤ 1 chemotherapy regimen for progressive disease were eligible. Temsirolimus was administered in a 250-mg intravenous dose weekly. Results Sixty-five patients were treated. The incidence of grade 3 or higher nonhematologic toxicity was 51%, and consisted mostly of hypercholesterolemia (11%), hypertriglyceridemia (8%), and hyperglycemia (8%). Grade 3 hematologic toxicity was observed in 11% of patients. Temsirolimus peak concentration (Cmax), and sirolimus Cmax and area under the concentration-time curve were decreased in patients receiving p450 enzyme–inducing anticonvulsants (EIACs) by 73%, 47%, and 50%, respectively, but were still within the therapeutic range of preclinical models. Twenty patients (36%) had evidence of improvement in neuroimaging, consisting of decrease in T2 signal abnormality +/− decrease in T1 gadolinium enhancement, on stable or reduced steroid doses. Progression-free survival at 6 months was 7.8% and median overall survival was 4.4 months. Median time to progression (TTP) for all patients was 2.3 months and was significantly longer for responders (5.4 months) versus nonresponders (1.9 months). Development of grade 2 or higher hyperlipidemia in the first two treatment cycles was associated with a higher percentage of radiographic response (71% v 31%; P = .04). Significant correlation was observed between radiographic improvement and high levels of phosphorylated p70s6 kinase in baseline tumor samples (P = .04). Conclusion Temsirolimus is well tolerated in recurrent GBM patients. Despite the effect of EIACs on temsirolimus metabolism, therapeutic levels were achieved. Radiographic improvement was observed in 36% of temsirolimus–treated patients, and was associated with significantly longer TTP. High levels of phosphorylated p70s6 kinase in baseline tumor samples appear to predict a patient population more likely to derive benefit from treatment. These findings should be validated in other studies of mTOR inhibitors.

Highly specific signal transduction inhibitors are being developed as anti-cancer agents against an array of molecular targets, with the promise of increased selectivity and lower toxicity than classic cytotoxic chemotherapy agents. Rapamycin and its analogues are a promising class of novel therapeutics that specifically inhibit signaling from the serine-threonine kinase, mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR). mTOR is a key intermediary in multiple mitogenic signaling pathways and plays a central role in modulating proliferation and angiogenesis in normal tissues and neoplastic processes. Rapamycin potently inhibits T-cell proliferation, and is approved for clinical use as an immuno-suppressant following kidney transplantation. Hyperactivation of mTOR signaling has been implicated in tumorigenesis, and promising pre-clinical studies in several tumor types suggest that the anti-proliferative and anti-angiogenic properties of rapamycin may be useful in cancer therapy. These studies have led to several clinical trials evaluating the safety and efficacy of rapamycin analogs in cancer therapy. The goal of this article is to review the mechanism of action of rapamycin as an anti-cancer agent, and to review the clinical experience with rapamycin and rapamycin analogs as immunosuppressive and anti-neoplastic therapeutic agents.

To determine the long-term outcome of resected choroid plexus papillomas (CPPs).Medical records and histologic specimens were reviewed for 41 patients (19 male, 22 female; median age, 36 years; range, 6 months to 74 years) with CPP seen between 1974 and 2000. Tumor locations were as follows: 76%, fourth ventricle; 17%, lateral ventricle, and 7%, third ventricle. Fifty-six percent had a gross total resection (GTR) and 44% had a subtotal resection (STR). Median follow-up was 6.5 years.Five-year local control, distant brain control, and overall survival were 84%, 92%, and 97%, respectively. Comparison of GTR and STR at 5 years showed a significant increase in local control (100% vs. 68%; P = 0.04) but not in overall survival (100% vs. 94%). Even after STR, only 50% of patients required a subsequent resection for recurrence. Addition of radiation therapy to initial STR did not seem to influence outcomes. At first relapse, GTR was accomplished in 1 patient, and only STR was accomplished in the others. Addition of radiation therapy to STR in our study led to disease control in half the patients treated, and STR alone led to disease control in only a quarter of the patients. Second relapses were treated palliatively with radiation therapy.Surgical resection is the treatment of choice for CPPs. After initial STR, reoperations for recurrence are required only half the time. Therefore, there seems to be no role for radiation therapy after initial STR. For STRs at first relapse, local control outcome is poor.

Purpose Conventional treatment of glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) cures less than 5% of patients. We investigated the effect of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) added to conventional external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) with carmustine (BCNU) on the survival of patients with GBM. Methods and materials A total of 203 patients with supratentorial GBM (tumor ≤40 mm) were randomly assigned either to postoperative SRS followed by EBRT (60 Gy) plus BCNU (80 mg/m 2 Days 1–3 every 8 weeks for six cycles) or to EBRT with BCNU alone. The dose of radiosurgery was tumor size–dependent and ranged from 15 Gy for largest to 24 Gy for smallest tumors. RT and BCNU were identical in both arms. Results At a median follow-up time of 61 months, the median survival in the radiosurgery group was 13.5 months (95% confidence interval, 11.0–14.8) as compared with 13.6 months (95% confidence interval, 11.2–15.2, p = 0.5711) for the standard treatment group. There were also no significant differences in 2- and 3-year survival rates and in patterns of failure between the two arms. Quality of life deterioration and cognitive decline at the end of therapy, compared with baseline, were comparable and there was no difference in quality-adjusted survival between the arms. Conclusions Stereotactic radiosurgery followed by EBRT and BCNU does not improve the outcome in patients with GBM nor does it change the general quality of life or cognitive functioning.

Radiotherapy is a component of the treatment regimen for the majority of patients with low-grade gliomas. Therefore, the effect of radiotherapy on the long-term cognitive performance of these patients is a major concern. This article reviews the neurocognitive effects of radiotherapy on patients with low-grade gliomas. The weight of evidence suggests only sporadic, limited neurocognitive damage from focal radiotherapy at the doses usually prescribed for low-grade gliomas.

Brain metastases from malignant melanoma have a poor prognosis, and treatment can be difficult because of rapid progression of the disease. To help define the treatment of this disease, we reviewed the published literature on brain metastases from melanoma. If a solitary metastasis is present, surgery might be beneficial, especially if systemic disease is absent. Stereotactic radiosurgery is a less invasive, attractive option for solitary or oligometastatic (up to 6) lesions. External beam whole-brain radiation therapy can produce responses and frequently palliates symptoms, but as the sole therapy, it is unlikely to eradicate brain metastases. Chemotherapy may be gaining a role with newer agents that penetrate the blood-brain barrier. Combined modality therapy appears to be the future direction of treatment of multiple metastases.

Purpose To evaluate the efficacy of preradiotherapy (RT) chemotherapy with carmustine, cisplatin, and oral etoposide combined with RT in the treatment of newly diagnosed anaplastic astrocytoma. Methods and materials Therapy consisted of carmustine (40 mg/m2/d) on Days 1–3, oral etoposide (50 mg/d) on Days 1–21 and 29–49, and cisplatin (20 mg/m2/d i.v.) on Days 1–3 and 29–31. The regimen was repeated every 8 weeks for three cycles, with conventionally fractionated RT (5000 cGy with a 1000-cGy boost) delivered concurrently with the third cycle. Results A total of 29 patients were enrolled between December 1999 and March 2001. For varying reasons (e.g., progression, refusal, death, or toxicity), only 48% completed the chemotherapy regimen and 76% completed RT. Grade 3-4 toxicities were observed in 14 patients (48%). The primary study endpoint was the 23-month (700-day) survival, the median survival of patients with anaplastic astrocytoma in a previous North Central Cancer Treatment Group trial. To be considered an active treatment, a maximum of 9 patient deaths (of the first 25) were allowed before 700 days. However, 14 patients had died by 700 days after therapy. Conclusion Our results have demonstrated that pre-RT chemotherapy with this regimen is insufficiently active in patients with anaplastic astrocytoma.