Search

Aims: Identification of high-risk patients and individualized decision support based on objective criteria for rapid discharge after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) are key requirements in the context of contemporary TAVI treatment. This study aimed to predict 30-day mortality following TAVI based on machine learning (ML) using data from the German Aortic Valve Registry., Methods and Results: Mortality risk was determined using a random forest ML model that was condensed in the newly developed TAVI Risk Machine (TRIM) scores, designed to represent clinically meaningful risk modelling before (TRIMpre) and in particular after (TRIMpost) TAVI. Algorithm was trained and cross-validated on data of 22 283 patients (729 died within 30 days post-TAVI) and generalisation was examined on data of 5864 patients (146 died). TRIMpost demonstrated significantly better performance than traditional scores [ C -statistics value, 0.79; 95% confidence interval (CI)] [0.74; 0.83] compared to Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) with C -statistics value 0.69; 95%-CI [0.65; 0.74]). An abridged (aTRIMpost) score comprising 25 features (calculated using a web interface) exhibited significantly higher performance than traditional scores ( C -statistics value, 0.74; 95%-CI [0.70; 0.78]). Validation on external data of 6693 patients (205 died within 30 days post-TAVI) of the Swiss TAVI Registry confirmed significantly better performance for the TRIMpost ( C -statistics value 0.75, 95%-CI [0.72; 0.79]) compared to STS ( C -statistics value 0.67, CI [0.63; 0.70])., Conclusion: TRIM scores demonstrate good performance for risk estimation before and after TAVI. Together with clinical judgement, they may support standardised and objective decision-making before and after TAVI., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: T Friede reports personal fees for statistical consultancies (includingdata monitoring committees) from Novartis, Bayer, Janssen, Roche, Galapagos, Penumbra, Parexel, Vifor, BiosenseWebster, CSLBehring, Fresenius Kabi, Coherex Medical, LivaNova, Minoryx, IQVIA, Enanta, Relaxera, Immunic; all outside the submitted work. CHamm reports membership in the International Strategic Advisory Board of Medtronic Inc. H Möllmann reports Speaker honoraria, advisory board and proctor fees Abbott, Boston Scientific, Edwards Lifesciences, Medtronic. S Stortecky reports research grants to theinstitution from Edwards Lifesciences, Medtronic, Abbott and Boston Scientific, and personal fees from Boston Scientific, Teleflex, and BTG. S Windecker reports research, travel or educational grants to the institution without personal remuneration from Abbott, Abiomed, Amgen, Astra Zeneca, Bayer, Braun, Biotronik, Boehringer Ingelheim, Boston Scientific, Bristol Myers Squibb, Cardinal Health,CardioValve, Cordis Medical, Corflow Therapeutics, CSL Behring, Daiichi Sankyo, Edwards Lifesciences, Farapulse Inc. Fumedica, Guerbet, Idorsia, Inari Medical, InfraRedx, Janssen-Cilag, Johnson & Johnson, Medalliance, Medicure, Medtronic, Merck Sharp &Dohm, Miracor Medical, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Organon, OrPha Suisse, Pharming Tech. Pfizer, Polares, Regeneron, Sanofi-Aventis, Servier, Sinomed, Terumo, Vifor, V-Wave. He served as advisory board member and/or member of the steering/executive group oftrials funded by Abbott, Abiomed, Amgen, Astra Zeneca, Bayer, Boston Scientific, Biotronik, Bristol Myers Squibb, Edwards Lifesciences,MedAlliance, Medtronic, Novartis, Polares, Recardio, Sinomed, Terumo, and V-Wave with payments to the institution but no personalpayments. He is also member of the steering/executive committee group of several investigator-initiated trials. G Hasenfuß reportshonorarium for consultating and/or for lectures from AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer, Impulse Dynamics, Novartis, Pfizer, Servier, Viforand Consultation without honoraria from Corvia. T Seidler reports research or educational grants to the institution by Edwards LifeSciences and honoraria for lectures or advisory board consultations or travel grants from Abbott Vascular, AstraZeneca, BoehringerIngelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Corvia, Cytokinetics, Edwards Life Sciences, Medtronic, Myocardia, Novartis, Pfizer, Teleflex. S. Bleiziffer reports Speaker fees from Boston Scentific, Abbott, Edwards Lifesciences and Medtronic. All other authors declare no conflicts of interest exist., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.)

Background: Severe calcification of the ascending aorta increases the peri-operative risk for neurological complications in patients with severe aortic stenosis. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) seems to be an optimal treatment option in these patients. However, the impact of the extent of aortic calcification on procedural and neurological outcomes during TAVI is unclear., Methods: Data from 3010 patients with severe native aortic valve stenosis treated with ACURATE neo/neo2 from May 2012 to July 2022 were evaluated and matched by 2-to-1 nearest-neighbor matching to identify one patient with porcelain aorta (PA) ( n = 492) compared with two patients without PA ( n = 984). PA was additionally subdivided into circumferential (classic PA) ( n = 89; 3.0%) and non-circumferential (partial PA) ( n = 403; 13.4%) calcification. We compared outcomes according to VARC-3 criteria among patients with and without PA and identified predictors for occurrence of stroke in the overall population., Results: Technical success (88.5% vs. 87.4%, p = 0.589) and device success at 30 days (82.3% vs. 81.5%, p = 0.755) after transcatheter ACURATE neo/neo2 implantation according to VARC-3 definition was high and did not differ between non-calcified aortas or PA. The rate of in-hospital complications according to VARC-3-definitions was low in both groups. Rates of all stroke (3.2% ( n = 31) vs. 2.6% ( n = 13), p = 0.705) or transitory ischemic attacks (1.1% vs. 1.2%, p = 1.000) did not differ significantly. Thirty-day all-cause mortality did not differ (3.0% vs. 3.2%, RR 1.1; p = 0.775). Overall device migration/embolization (OR 5.0 [2.10;11.87]), severe bleeding (OR 1.79 [1.11;2.89]), and major structural cardiac complications (OR 3.37 [1.32;8.57]) were identified as independent predictors for in-hospital stroke in a multivariate analysis after implantation of ACURATE neo/neo2 ., Conclusion: A porcelain aorta does not increase the risk of neurological complications after transfemoral ACURATE neo/neo2 implantation. Based on these findings, transfemoral ACURATE neo/neo2 implantation is safe in these particularly vulnerable patients.

Background: In addition to the edge-to-edge MitraClip repair system, the edge-to-spacer PASCAL repair system was approved for percutaneous treatment of severe mitral regurgitation (MR). Comparative data are lacking., Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare procedural and short-term safety and efficacy of 2 leaflet-based transcatheter mitral valve repair systems., Methods: Procedural and 30-day outcomes were investigated in a propensity score-matched cohort of 307 PASCAL and 307 MitraClip patients at 10 sites. Matching criteria included sex, age, left ventricular ejection fraction, New York Heart Association functional class, MR etiology, left ventricular end-diastolic diameter, left atrial volume index, and vena contracta width. The primary efficacy endpoints were technical success and degree of residual MR at discharge. The primary safety endpoint was the rate of major adverse events (MAE)., Results: Technical success was 97.0% in the PASCAL group and 98.0% in the MitraClip group (P = 0.624). MR ≤2+ at discharge was comparable in both groups (PASCAL: 93.8% vs MitraClip: 92.4%; P = 0.527), with more patients exhibiting MR ≤1+ in the PASCAL group (70.5% vs 56.6%; P < 0.001). The postprocedural mean gradient was significantly higher in the MitraClip group (3.3 ± 1.5 mm Hg vs 3.9 ± 1.7 mm Hg; P < 0.001). At 30 days, all-cause mortality and MAE rates were similar (mortality: 1.7% vs 3.3%; P = 0.299; MAE: 3.9% vs 5.2%; P = 0.562)., Conclusions: In this first large propensity score-matched comparison, procedural success rates and MAE did not differ significantly between patients treated with the PASCAL or MitraClip valve repair system. Procedural results with less than moderate MR and no elevated transmitral gradient were more common in the PASCAL group, which might have an impact on long-term outcome., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures Dr Iliadis has received travel support from Abbott; and has received consultant honoraria from Abbott and Edwards Lifesciences. Dr Hausleiter has received research grants and speaker honoraria from Abbott Cardiovascular and Edwards Lifesciences. Dr Lurz has received institutional fees and research grants from Abbott Cardiovascular, Edwards Lifesciences, and Medtronic. Dr Möllmann has received speaker honoraria from Abbott Cardiovascular and Edwards Lifesciences. Dr Rudolph has received research grants and consulting honoraria from Edwards Lifesciences. Dr von Bardeleben has received consulting and lecture honoraria from Abbott Cardiovascular, Boehringer Ingelheim, Edwards Lifesciences, NeoChord, and Medtronic. Dr Nef has received speaker and consulting honoraria from Abbott Vascular and Edwards Lifesciences. Dr Luedike has received consulting and lecture honoraria from Edwards Lifesciences. Drs Pfister and Baldus have received consulting honoraria from Edwards Lifesciences. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2022 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) frequently presented mitral regurgitation (MR), which may interfere with the standard echocardiographic measurements of mean pressure gradient (MPG), flow velocity, and aortic valve area (AVA)., Aims: Herein we investigated the prevalence and severity of MR in patients with severe AS and its role on the accuracy of the standard echocardiographic parameters of AS quantification., Methods: Of all patients with severe AS undergoing transcatheter or surgical aortic valve replacement enrolled in the German Aortic Registry from 2011 to 2017, 119,641 were included in this study. The population was divided based on the values of left ventricular ejection fraction ([LVEF] > 50%, LVEF 31-50%, and LVEF ≤ 30%] and AVA (0.80 to ≤ 1.00 cm 2 , 0.60 to < 0.80 cm 2 , 0.40 to < 0.60 cm 2 , and 0.20 to < 0.40 cm 2 )., Results: Overall, 77,890 (65%) patients with mild to-moderate and 4262 (4%) with severe MR were compared with 37,489 (31%) patients without MR. Patients with mild-to-moderate and severe MR presented significantly lower mPG (ΔmPG [95%CI] - 1.694 mmHg [- 2.123 to - 1.265], p < 0.0001 and - 6.954 mmHg [- 7.725 to - 6.183], p < 0.0001, respectively), that increased with LVEF impairment. Conversely, AVA did not differ (severe versus no MR: ΔAVA [95%CI]: - 0.007cm 2 [- 0.023 to 0.009], p = 0.973). Increasing MR severity was associated with significant mPG reduction throughout all AVA strata, causing a low-gradient pattern, that manifested since the early stages of severe AS (LVEF > 50%: AVA 0.80 to 1.00 cm 2 ; LVEF 31-50%: AVA 0.60 to 0.80 cm 2 )., Conclusions: In patients with severe AS, concomitant MR is common, contributes to the onset of a low-gradient AS pattern, and affects the diagnostic accuracy of flow-dependent AVA measurements. In this setting, a multimodality, AVA-centric approach should be implemented. In patients with severe aortic stenosis, concomitant mitral regurgitation contributes to the onset of a low-gradient pattern, warranting a multimodality, and AVA-centric diagnostic approach., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Objective: We compared TAVI vs. SAVR in patients with moderate-to-severe chronic kidney disease (eGFR 15-60 ml/min/1.73 m 2 ) for whom both procedures could possibly be considered (age ≤ 80 years, STS-score 4-8)., Background: According to both ACC/AHA and ESC/EACTS recent guidelines, aortic stenosis may be treated with either transcatheter (TAVI) or surgical (SAVR) aortic valve replacement in a subgroup of patients. A shared therapeutic decision is made by a heart team based on individual factors, including chronic kidney disease (CKD)., Methods: Data from the large nationwide German Aortic Valve Registry were used. A propensity score method was used to select 704 TAVI and 374 SAVR matched patients. Primary endpoint was 1-year survival. Secondary endpoints were clinical complications, including pacemaker implantation, vascular complications, myocardial infarction, bleeding, and the need for new-onset dialysis., Results: One-year survival was similar (HR [95% CI] for TAVI 1.271 [0.795, 2.031], p = 0.316), with no divergence in Kaplan-Meier curves. In spite of post-procedural short-term survival being numerically higher for TAVI patients and 1-year survival being numerically higher for SAVR patients, such differences did not reach statistical significance (96.4% vs. 94.2%, p = 0.199, and 86.2% vs. 81.2%, p = 0.316, respectively). In weighted analyses, pacemaker implantation, vascular complications, and were significantly more common with TAVI; whereas myocardial infarction, bleeding requiring transfusion, and longer ICU-stay and overall hospitalization were higher with SAVR. Temporary dialysis was more common with SAVR (p < 0.0001); however, a probable need for chronic dialysis was rare and similar in both groups., Conclusion: Both TAVI and SAVR led to comparable and excellent results in patients with moderate-to-severe CKD in an intermediate-risk population of patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis for whom both therapies could possibly be considered., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

In recent years, software-assisted imaging systems, such as computed tomography, have contributed to the improvement of noninvasive options for the diagnostics of coronary heart disease (CHD). In addition, the possibilities of individual morphological and functional atherosclerotic plaque evaluation could be further refined, e.g. by the use of optical coherence tomography or the quantitative flow ratio (QFR). Due to the development of robotic-assisted catheter systems, it has been possible to make coronary interventions more precise and with less radiation exposure for the examiner. It is to be expected that in the future even better algorithms will be developed by the analysis of very large amounts of data. These will enable a more exact, dynamic and personalized prediction of, e.g. treatment success or individual risk profiles, in order to positively and sustainably influence the treatment of patients with cardiovascular diseases., (© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Medizin Verlag GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature.)

Background and Aims: Currently, it is unclear whether transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) without predilation (direct TAVI; d-TAVI) or with preimplantation balloon valvuloplasty (b-TAVI) provides similar clinical safety and efficacy. Therefore, we analyzed patients undergoing d-TAVI or b-TAVI for severe aortic stenosis (AS) with either self-expanding or balloon-expandable transcatheter heart valves (THVs) from the German Aortic Valve Registry (GARY)., Methods: Between 2011 and 2017, a total of 44,783 TAVI patients were collected, with 25,717 (57.4%) receiving a balloon-expandable THV and 19,066 (42.6%) receiving a self-expanding THV. A propensity-score weighted model was used to compare d-TAVI vs b-TAVI regarding differences in outcome., Results: B-TAVI was performed in 71% and d-TAVI was performed in 29% of patients. In the investigated time interval, frequency of b-TAVI declined from 88.4% to 58.2%, accompanied by a constant rate of postdilation. After propensity weighting of patients receiving balloon-expandable THV, d-TAVI vs b-TAVI was associated with more frequent postoperative transvalvular mean pressure gradients (mPG) >15 mm Hg (20.7% vs 18.4%; P<.001), similar rates of paravalvular leakage (PVL) ≥ moderate (18.0% vs 16.9%; P=.08), fewer postdilations (13.4% vs 15.5%; P<.001), and fewer complications (permanent pacemaker implantation, 10.2% vs 11.9% [P=.01]; vascular complications, 1.9% vs 2.6% [P<.01]; pericardial tamponade, 0.5% vs 0.9% [P<.01]; and stroke, 0.9% vs 1.3% [P=.02]). In patients receiving self-expanding THVs, d-TAVI vs b-TAVI was associated with more frequent postimplantation mean PG ≥ 15 mm Hg (12.7% vs 10.4%; P<.01), higher rates of PVL ≥ moderate (24.8% vs 16.5%; P<.001), and similar complication rates including permanent pacemaker implantation., Conclusions: The safety and efficacy of d-TAVI vs b-TAVI depends on the type of THV implanted. For balloon-expandable valves, d-TAVI provides an advantage, while self-expanding valves offer a similar safety profile for d-TAVI compared with b-TAVI. However, increased mPG post intervention with both valve types and more significant PVL in self-expanding THVs emphasize the importance of proper patient selection and evaluation of valve anatomy to identify suitable cases for d-TAVI.

Background: The next-generation ACURATE neo2 transcatheter aortic valve was designed for simplified implantation and to mitigate the risk of paravalvular leak (PVL) compared to the earlier device., Aims: To collect clinical outcomes and device performance data, including echocardiography and 4-dimensional computed tomography (4D-CT) data, with the ACURATE neo2 transcatheter heart valve in patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS)., Methods: ACURATE neo2 PMCF is a single-arm, multicentre study of patients with severe AS treated in routine clinical practice. The primary safety endpoint was all-cause mortality at 30-days. The primary imaging endpoint was hypo-attenuated leaflet thickening (HALT), measured by core laboratory-adjudicated 4D-CT at 30 days. Secondary endpoints included VARC safety endpoints, procedural success, and evaluation of valve performance via core laboratory-adjudicated echocardiography., Results: The study enrolled 250 patients at 18 European centres (mean age: 80.8 years; 63.6% female; mean STS score: 2.9±2.0%); 246 (98.4%) were successfully treated with ACURATE neo2. The 30-day rates for mortality and disabling stroke were 0.8% and 0%, respectively. The new permanent pacemaker implantation rate was 6.5%. HALT >50% was present in 9.3% of patients at 30 days. Valve haemodynamics improved from baseline to 30 days (mean aortic valve gradient: from 47.6±14.5 mmHg to 8.6±3.9 mmHg; mean aortic valve area: from 0.7±0.2 cm2 to 1.6±0.4 cm2). At 30 days, PVL was evaluated as none/trace in 79.2% of patients, mild in 18.9%, moderate in 1.9%, and severe in 0%., Conclusions: The study results support the safety and efficacy of TAVI with ACURATE neo2 in patients in routine clinical practice.

Background: Few data exist on immediate outcomes of the next-generation Acurate neo2 prosthesis (Boston Scientific), which is distinguished by an active sealing mechanism. We sought to determine procedural outcomes of transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement using the neo2 in comparison with its predecessor, the Acurate neo., Methods: In this retrospective analysis, consecutive neo2 and neo cases were compared from 2 high-volume centers. The primary outcome of interest was the rate of relevant paravalvular regurgitation (PVR), defined as PVR ≥ moderate, or valve-in-valve and/or surgical aortic valve replacement for PVR ≥ moderate. Secondary outcomes of interest were assessed according to Valve Academic Research Consortium (VARC)-3 criteria. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify predictors of relevant PVR., Results: A total of 810 neo2 and 2055 neo cases comprised the study cohort. The rate of relevant PVR was significantly lower in the neo2 group (2.7% vs 4.5%; P=.04). The technical success rate was numerically higher in the neo2 group (91.5% vs 89.3%; P=.10) and the rate of device success at 30 days was significantly higher (86.5% vs 82.9%; P=.02). In the neo group, a greater amount of aortic valve calcification (AVC), the presence of eccentric AVC, less oversizing, and a higher sinotubular junction annulus index were predictors of relevant PVR, whereas in the neo2 population only the presence of eccentric AVC, less oversizing, and a higher sinotubular junction annulus index was predictive., Conclusion: The neo2 valve shows superior outcomes over the neo valve, with a lower burden of PVR and a higher device success rate at 30 days.

Objectives: We aimed to develop and validate an effective prediction model for 1-year mortality risk in elective transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), ie, the TAVR-Risk (TARI) model., Background: TAVR is the primary treatment for patients with symptomatic severe aortic valve stenosis; however, risk assessment tools for longer-term outcomes after TAVR remain scarce., Methods: This retrospective cohort study used logistic regression to test univariate and multivariate associations. The German Aortic Valve Registry (GARY) was the derivation (n = 20,704) and the Swedish SWEDEHEART TAVR Registry (SWENTRY) was the validation cohort (n = 3982). The main outcome was the area under the curve (AUC) in the prediction of 1-year mortality. The final model included 12 parameters that were associated with 1-year mortality in a multivariate analysis., Results: The TARI model (AUC, 0.66; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.65-0.67) performed better as compared with the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) score (AUC, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.62-0.64; P<.001) and logistic EuroSCORE I (AUC, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.59-0.61; P<.001) in the GARY derivation cohort, and discriminated the risk for 1-year mortality better than logistic EuroSCORE I in the SWENTRY validation cohort (AUC, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.60-0.64 vs AUC, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.57-0.61; P=.04)., Conclusions: This novel TARI score provides a relatively easy-to-use risk model and offers a superior prediction for 1-year mortality in European TAVR patients.

Gender-based differences in outcomes after successful transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) in patients without an indication for oral anticoagulation have not been well studied. We aim to evaluate gender-based differences in clinical outcomes after TAVI. In the present analysis of the GALILEO (Global study comparing a rivaroxaban-based antithrombotic strategy to an antiplatelet-based strategy after transcatheter aortic valve replacement to optimize clinical outcomes) trial, patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis and who underwent successful TAVI were stratified by gender. The primary outcome was major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs), a composite of all-cause mortality or thromboembolic events (including any stroke, myocardial infarction, symptomatic valve thrombosis, systemic embolism, deep-vein thrombosis, or pulmonary embolism). Major bleeding was defined as a composite of major, life-threatening, or disabling Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 bleeding. Of 1,644 patients, 813 were female, and 831 were male. At baseline, female patients were older and at higher surgical risk (Society of Thoracic Surgeons risk score: 4.7 ± 3.6 versus 3.6 ± 3.0, p &lt;0.0001) than male patients. After adjustment for differences in baseline clinical and procedural parameters, female patients had lower rates of MACCE (hazard ratio [HR] 0.69, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.49 to 0.96), all-cause mortality (HR 0.54, 95% CI 0.34 to 0.87), and noncardiovascular mortality (HR 0.33, 95% CI 0.15 to 0.75) at a median of 17 months of follow-up. By landmark analyses, these differences appeared to emerge with a longer follow-up time. No significant differences in major, life-threatening, or disabling bleeding, cardiovascular mortality, and stroke were noted. In conclusion, compared with male patients, female patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis had a lower risk of MACCE and mortality but a similar risk of bleeding events after TAVI., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Midterm data comparing clinical outcomes after successful implantation of self-expanding and balloon-expandable transcatheter heart valves (THV) are limited. We aimed to compare 2-year outcomes after successful transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) with the Edwards balloon-expandable or the Medtronic self-expanding THV., Methods: Two-year outcomes were analyzed according to the implanted THV in the GALILEO trial. Major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) was a composite of all-cause death or thromboembolic events including stroke, myocardial infarction, symptomatic valve thrombosis, systemic embolism, deep-vein thrombosis, or pulmonary embolism., Results: Among 1644 patients recruited in 136 centers across 16 countries between 2015 and 2018, 499 received a self-expanding and 757 patients received a balloon-expandable THV. Patients treated with a self-expanding THV were more likely to be female, and had higher surgical risk, lower hemoglobin levels, and more frequent valve-in-valve procedures than those with a balloon-expandable THV. After multivariable adjustment, there were no significant differences in major clinical outcomes between self-expanding versus balloon-expandable THV: MACCE (17.0% vs. 13.4%, adjusted-hazard ratios [HR] 1.18, 95% confidence intervals [CI]: 0.82-1.69); all-cause death (11.4% vs. 9.3%, adjusted-HR 1.26; 95% CI: 0.78-2.05); cardiovascular death (8.5% vs. 4.0%, adjusted-HR 1.53; 95% CI: 0.82-2.86), any stroke (5.1% vs. 3.7%, adjusted-HR 0.86; 95% CI: 0.43-1.73); major or life-threatening bleeding (5.9% vs. 6.8%, adjusted-HR 0.93; 95% CI: 0.53-1.63)., Clinical Trial Registration: https://www., Clinicaltrials: gov. NCT02556203., Conclusions: Two-year follow-up data from the GALILEO trial indicate that successful TAVI either with self-expanding or balloon-expandable THVs according to physician discretion did not show difference in rates of MACCE., (© 2022 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Background: Self-expanding transcatheter valves (THV) seem superior to balloon-expanding valves in regard to the incidence of prosthesis-patient mismatch (PPM). Data on the occurrence of PPM with the ACURATE neo/neo2 system as a representative of self-expanding prostheses in very small annuli, even below the applicable instructions for use (IFU), are scarce., Methods: Data from 654 patients with severe native aortic stenosis treated with the smallest size ACURATE neo/neo2 valve (size S, 23 mm) at two German high-volume centers from 06/2012 to 12/2021 were evaluated. We compared clinical and hemodynamic outcomes among patients with implantation in adherence to the recommended sizing (on-label n = 529) and below the recommended sizing range (off-label n = 125) and identified predictors for PPM in the overall population. BMI-adjusted PPM was defined according to VARC-3 recommendations., Results: Post-procedure, the mean gradient (10.0 mmHg vs. 9.0 mmHg, p = 0.834) and the rate of paravalvular leakage (PVL) ≥ moderate (3.2% vs. 2.8%, p = 0.770) were similar between on-label and off-label implantations. The rate of moderate to severe PPM (24%) was comparably low in ACURATE neo/neo2 S, with a very low proportion of severe PPM whether implanted off- or on-label (4.9% vs. 3.8%, p = 0.552). Thirty-day all-cause mortality was higher among patients with off-label implantations (6.5% vs. 2.3%, p = 0.036). In the subgroup of these patients, no device-related deaths occurred, and cardiac causes did not differ (each 5). Besides small annulus area and high BMI, a multivariate analysis identified a greater cover index (OR 3.26), deep implantation (OR 2.25) and severe calcification (OR 2.07) as independent predictors of PPM., Conclusions: The ACURATE neo/neo2 S subgroup shows a convincing hemodynamic outcome according to low mean gradient even outside the previous IFUs without a relevant increase in the rate of PVL or PPM. In addition to known factors such as annulus area and BMI, potential predictors for PPM are severe annulus calcification and implantation depth. Nevertheless, the ACURATE neo/neo2 system seems to be a reliable option in patients with very small annuli.

Objectives: Aortic valve (AV) repair is an evolving surgical strategy in the treatment of young patients with aortic regurgitation (AR) and/or aortic root aneurysm. We aimed to determine the clinical outcome following AV repair/AV-sparing root surgery using real-world data from the German Aortic Valve Registry., Methods: A total of 2327 patients with AR (mean age 55.2 ± 15.0 years, 76% men), who underwent AV repair/AV-sparing root surgery between 2011 and 2015 (i.e. 5% of 42 868 AV surgery patients enrolled in the German Aortic Valve Registry during the same period) were included. Study cohort was subdivided according to the technique of AV repair: isolated AV repair without root surgery (group I) (n = 914), AV-sparing root surgery (i.e. reimplantation or remodelling) without cusp repair (group II) (n = 1077) and AV-sparing root surgery (i.e. reimplantation or remodelling) with simultaneous cusp repair (group III) (n = 336). Primary end point was 1-year survival after AV repair/AV-sparing root surgery. Secondary end points were freedom from cardiac adverse events and freedom from AV reinterventions at 1-year follow-up., Results: Thirty-day mortality was 19 (0.8%) in the whole study cohort without significant differences in the 3 subgroups [4 (0.4%) patients in group I vs 14 (1.3%) patients in group II vs 1 (0.3%) patient in group III (P = 0.054)]. Postoperatively, 1445 (74%) patients had no residual AR, 474 (24%) patients had mild AR and 40 (2%) patients had moderate/severe AR at the time of hospital discharge. One-year survival (95% confidence interval) was 97.7% (97.1-98.3) in the whole study cohort and without significant difference among the 3 subgroups. One-year cardiac adverse event-free survival (95% confidence interval) was 85.7% (84.2-87.1) and was similar in all 3 study groups in propensity score-weighted analysis. A total of 38 (1.6%) patients required AV reintervention during a 1-year follow-up, without significant difference among subgroups (P = 0.11)., Conclusions: AV repair/AV-sparing root surgery is performed in 5% of patients requiring AV surgery in Germany. Our data demonstrate very satisfactory periprocedural and 1-year survival and cardiac event-free survival after AV repair surgery. Implementation of specific surgical techniques during the index procedure seems to result in comparable outcomes., (© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.)

Background: Based on the results of several recent randomized trials, European and American guidelines on valvular heart disease management have substantially expanded the indications for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). We present an all-comer data on peri-operative risk profile and in-hospital outcomes from Germany for patients treated by TAVI or isolated surgical aortic valve replacement (iSAVR) in 2020, providing an opportunity to compare study data with data from daily clinical practice., Methods: Data concerning all isolated aortic valve procedures performed in Germany in 2020 were retrieved from the mandatory nationwide quality control program. Expected mortality was calculated with the annually revised German Aortic valve score (AKL-score) based on the data of either catheter-based (AKL-CATH) or isolated surgical (AKL-CHIR) aortic valve replacement in Germany from the previous year (2019)., Results: In 2020 21,903 TAVI procedures (20,810 transvascular (TV; vs. 2019: 22.973; - 9.4%), 1093 transapical (TA; vs. 2019: 1413; - 22.6%)) and 6144 (vs. 2019 7905; - 22.5%) iSAVR were performed in Germany. Patients who received TAVI showed a significantly higher perioperative risk profile than patients undergoing iSAVR based on older age and more severe co-morbidities. While in-hospital mortality after TAVI (2.3%) was numerically lower than in 2019 (2.5%), this difference was not significant (p = 0.11). In-hospital mortality after iSAVR was identical in 2020 and 2019 (2.8%) and thus higher than after TAVI (p = 0.003), resulting in an observed expected mortality ratio of 1.02 after TAVI and 1.05 after iSAVR. After exclusion of the emergency procedures, in-hospital mortality did not differ significantly between the groups (TAVI 2.2% vs. iSAVR 1.9%, p = 0.26)., Conclusion: Total numbers of both iSAVR and TAVI in Germany were lower in 2020 than in 2019, most likely due to the COVID-19 pandemic. However, the relative number of patients treated by TAVI as compared to iSAVR continues to increase. Despite older age and more severe comorbidities compared to patients undergoing iSAVR the in-hospital mortality after TAVI continued to decrease in 2020 and remains significantly lower than after iSAVR., (© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany.)

Background: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is indispensable in cardiology; however, exposure to potentially harmful ionising radiation remains a concern., Aims: This study was designed to assess the PCI-related radiation dose over the last decade and to identify predictors of increased dose exposure., Methods: The PROcedural radiaTion dose Exposure in percutaneous Coronary intervenTION (PROTECTION VIII) study included all PCIs reported to a German quality assurance programme between 2008 and 2018. Dose area product (DAP) and radiation time were analysed. Effective dose (ED) was estimated (ED=DAP*k; conversion coefficient k=0.0022 mSv/cGy*cm 2 ). Multivariate linear regression analysis was used to identify predictors associated with a clinically relevant increase of radiation dose (ED ≥1 mSv)., Results: We enrolled 3,704,986 patients undergoing PCI (median age 70 years, 30% female). Indications were chronic coronary syndrome (37.5%), unstable angina pectoris and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (non-STEMI; 33.2%) and STEMI (18.5%). Median DAP was 4,203 (interquartile range [IQR] 2,313-7,300) cGy*cm, ED was 9.2 mSv and median radiation time was 9.2 (IQR 5.8-15.0) min. Within the 10-year period, radiation exposure was reduced by 36% (p<0.001) and resulted in a median DAP of 3,070 cGy*cm (ED 6.8 mSv) in 2018. A significant 5.3-fold variability of median DAP was observed between catheterisation laboratories (p<0.001). We identified patient-related (gender, coronary artery bypass graft surgery, heart failure) and procedure-related (coronary occlusion PCI, ostial lesion PCI, left main PCI, multivessel PCI) predictors of increased radiation dose (all p<0.001)., Conclusions: This radiation dose survey demonstrates a considerable reduction of PCI radiation exposure during the last decade. However, large variability between catheterisation laboratories underlines the need for further radiation dose reduction.

Background: During the last years, several transcatheter aortic heart valves entered the clinical market and are commercially available. The prostheses differ regarding several technical and functional aspects. However, little is known regarding head-to-head comparative data of the ACURATE neo and the PORTICO valve prostheses., Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare two self-expanding transcatheter aortic heart valves (THV), the ACURATE neo and the PORTICO, with regard to in-hospital and 30-day outcomes, as well as early device failures., Methods: A total of 1591 consecutive patients with severe native aortic valve stenosis from two centers were included in the analyses and matched by 1:1 nearest neighbor matching to identify one patient treated with PORTICO ( n = 344) for each patient treated with ACURATE neo ( n = 344)., Results: In-hospital complications were comparable between both valves, including any kind of stroke (ACURATE neo = 3.5% vs. PORTICO = 3.8%; p = 1.0), major vascular complications (ACURATE neo = 4.5% vs. PORTICO = 5.4%; p = 0.99) or life-threatening bleeding (ACURATE neo = 1% vs. PORTICO = 2%; p = 0.68). The rate of device failure defined by the VARC-2 criteria were comparable, including elevated gradients and moderate-to-severe paravalvular leakage (ACURATE neo = 7.3% vs. PORTICO = 7.6%; p = 1.0). However, the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI) was significantly more frequent after the use of PORTICO THV (9.5% vs. 18.7%; p = 0.002)., Conclusions: In this two-center case-matched comparison, short-term clinical and hemodynamic outcomes showed comparable results between PORTICO and ACURATE neo prostheses. However, PORTICO was associated with a significant higher incidence of PPI.

Objectives: The aim of this study was to analyse the outcome of patients between 50 and 69 years of age undergoing biological or mechanical aortic valve replacement., Methods: Data were collected from the German Aortic Valve Registry. Data were analysed regarding baseline characteristics and outcome parameters such as 5-year survival, stroke and reintervention., Results: In total., 3046 patients undergoing isolated surgical aortic valve replacement between 2011 and 2012 were investigated and a propensity score matching was performed. Within this period, 2239 patients received a biological prostheses, while 807 patients received a mechanical prosthesis. Mean age in the biological group was 63.07 (±5.11) and 57.34 (±4.67) in the mechanical group (standardized mean difference 1.172). In the overall cohort, there were more female patients in the biological group (32.7% vs 28.4%) and log EuroSCORE I was higher (5.41% vs 4.26%). After propensity matching (610 pairs), there was no difference in the mortality at 5-year follow-up (12.1% biological vs 9.2% mechanical P = 0.05) nor for reoperation/reintervention (2.5% biological vs 2.0% mechanical, P = 0.546). Patients undergoing mechanical aortic valve replacement suffered from a higher stroke rate 3.3% vs 1.5% (P = 0.04) at 5-year follow-up., Conclusions: Aortic valve replacement with biological or mechanical prostheses showed similar 5-year outcomes for survival and reoperation in a propensity-matched cohort, but significantly increased stroke rate after mechanical aortic valve replacement. This could influence the choice of a mechanical valve in younger patients., (© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.)

Background: Data are lacking regarding the outcomes of balloon postdilation (BPD) for the Acurate neo and neo2 devices. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of BPD in a large, single-center cohort of patients treated with the Acurate platform., Methods: For this retrospective analysis, we included all patients with severe aortic stenosis who underwent transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) with the Acurate neo or neo2 prosthesis at our institution., Results: Among 1417 Acurate recipients, BPD was required in 521 cases (36.8%) for relevant paravalvular regurgitation (PVR) (n = 418) and incomplete prosthesis expansion or increased transprosthetic gradients (n = 103). Overall, BPD was successful in 87.9% and led to a significant reduction of more-than-mild PVR from 32.0% to 7.5% (P<.001). In the BPD group, prosthesis-patient mismatch (PPM) was less common. Prosthetic leaflet damage or valve dislodgment due to BPD occurred in 6 cases (1.2%). All other outcomes were similar between groups with and without BPD, including rates of aortic root injury, stroke, acute kidney injury, permanent pacemaker implantation, and all-cause 30-day mortality. Independent predictors of the need for BPD were higher mean transaortic gradients, severe aortic valve calcification, less prosthesis oversizing, and the use of larger prosthesis sizes., Conclusion: For transfemoral TAVR using the Acurate neo/neo2, BPD effectively reduces relevant PVR and decreases the risk of PPM without increasing adverse events. Transcatheter heart valve damage associated with BPD is rare, commonly avoidable, and does not jeopardize the net benefit of BPD.

With some exceptions, myocardial revascularization in patients with chronic coronary syndrome (CCS) is generally decided on the basis of the extent of myocardial ischemia. Current data indicate that a patient will benefit from revascularization if ischemia is present in more than 10% of the myocardium. Accordingly, all patients presenting with CCS should undergo a noninvasive ischemia test that can answer this question before diagnostic coronary angiography. In order to be able to make a recommendation for revascularization based on scientific data even in those patients who previously had no clear evidence of ischemia, e.g., because of discrepant findings, measurement of the hemodynamic significance of coronary stenoses with a lumen diameter reduction ≥ 50% should be performed during coronary angiography. A decision to revascularize based on hemodynamic significance was shown to be beneficial to patients in several studies., (© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Medizin Verlag GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature.)

Since the last decade, transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has become the treatment of choice in patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis (AS) who are ineligible or at higher risk for surgery. Due to the high safety profile of current device generation, TAVI has emerged as a qualified alternative to surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) in patients with classic aortic stenosis and intermediate surgical risk, severe bicuspid aortic valve stenosis, and isolated pure aortic regurgitation. Moderate aortic stenosis, with and without concomitant heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, are under investigation in randomized controlled clinical trials from which we will gain exciting insights on the best timing of TAVI to protect the left ventricle from further functional deterioration due to increasing AS. In these cases, a meticulous diagnostic approach including advanced imaging is becoming more and more important. Current evidence on antithrombotic strategies after TAVI is weak, contributing to poor levels of standardization and high variability in daily clinical practice. This review will provide a short overview of recent clinical trials including best timing for TAVI with moderate AS and antithrombotic strategies after TAVI with current and future TAVI generations.

Background In the GLOBAL LEADERS trial, ticagrelor monotherapy beyond 1 month compared with standard antiplatelet regimens after coronary stent implantation did not improve outcomes at intention-to-treat analysis. Considerable differences in treatment adherence between the experimental and control groups may have affected the intention-to-treat results. In this reanalysis of the GLOBAL LEADERS trial, we compared the experimental and control treatment strategies in a per-protocol analysis of patients who did not deviate from the study protocol. Methods and Results Baseline and postrandomization information were used to classify whether and when patients were deviating from the study protocol. With logistic regressions, we derived time-varying inverse probabilities of nondeviation from protocol to reconstruct the trial population without protocol deviation. The primary end point was a composite of all-cause mortality or nonfatal Q-wave myocardial infarction at 2 years. At 2-year follow-up, 1103 (13.8%) of 7980 patients in the experimental group and 785 (9.8%) of 7988 patients in the control group qualified as protocol deviators. At per-protocol analysis, the rate ratio for the primary end point was 0.88 (95% CI, 0.75-1.03; P =0.10) on the basis of 274 versus 325 events in the experimental versus control group. The rate ratio for the key safety end point of major bleeding was 1.00 (95% CI, 0.79-1.26; P =0.99). The per-protocol and intention-to-treat effect estimates were overall consistent. Conclusions Among patients who complied with the study protocol in the GLOBAL LEADERS trial, ticagrelor plus aspirin for 1 month followed by ticagrelor monotherapy was not superior to 1-year standard dual antiplatelet therapy followed by aspirin alone at 2 years after coronary stenting. Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT01813435.

Purpose: We sought to compare parameters derived from cardiac computed tomography angiography (CCTA) with those from transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) for the evaluation of patients with severe mitral regurgitation (MR) before percutaneous edge-to-edge mitral valve repair (PE2E). TEE is the mainstay for PE2E, although it has specific limitations. CCTA enables measurements in any arbitrary plane with high spatial resolution and offers good calcium visibility., Materials and Methods: Patients who underwent TEE and CCTA before scheduled PE2E at 2 medical centers were included in this retrospective analysis. Quantitative parameters relevant for PE2E were obtained from TEE and CCTA in a blinded manner and the intrareviewer variability was assessed., Results: All 30 patients (15 female, 76±10 y) had secondary MR attributable to ischemic (60%) or nonischemic cardiomyopathy (40%). On comparing parameters from TEE and CCTA, left ventricular end-diastolic diameter was 60±11 versus 64±11 mm (r=0.90), intercommissural mitral annulus was 35±5 versus 35±5 mm (r=0.88), long-axis annulus was 33±5 versus 33±5 mm (r=0.74), the distance between the fossa ovalis and the leaflet coaptation was 42±5 versus 41±5 mm (r=0.81), the anterior mitral leaflet was 21±6 versus 20±7 mm (r=0.81), the posterior mitral leaflet was 13±2 versus 13±2 mm (r=0.91), and the median mitral calcification was 1 (interquartile range: 0 to 2) versus 0 (interquartile range: 0 to 1; r=0.53), respectively. Intrareviewer agreement was good and excellent for continuous and categorical variables, respectively., Conclusions: Our data suggest that evaluation of the mitral valve apparatus with CCTA in patients considered for PE2E is feasible, correlates well with TEE, and offers improved calcium visibility. In selected cases, additional information from CCTA may be helpful for achieving optimal interventional results., Competing Interests: M.R. received lecture fees from Abbott. W-.K.K. received proctor/speaker fees from Abbott, Boston Scientific, Edwards Lifesciences, Medtronic, and Meril. H.M. received lecture fees from Edwards Lifesciences and Abbott. The remaining authors declare no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Personalized prognosis plays a vital role in deciding between percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in patients with three-vessel disease (3VD). The aim of this study is to compare the modality of revascularization chosen by the local heart team to that recommended by using individualized predictions of medium, and long-term all-cause mortality amongst patients with 3VD screened in the Multivessel TALENT trial., Methods: The SYNTAX score II (SS-II) and SS-2020 were evaluated in 200 consecutive patients by a core laboratory and compared to the decision of the "on site" heart team., Results: According to the SS-II, CABG was the recommended treatment in 51 patients (25.5%) however 34 (66.6%) of them received PCI. According to SS-2020 the predicted absolute risk differences (ARD) between PCI and CABG were significantly higher in patients receiving CABG compared to those treated by PCI for major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events, a composite of all-cause mortality, stroke or myocardial infarction at 5-years (8.8 ± 4.6% vs 6.0 ± 4.0%, p < 0.001) and all-cause mortality at 5- (5.2 ± 3.5% vs 3.7 ± 3.0%, p = 0.008) and 10-years (9.3 ± 4.8% vs 6.2 ± 4.2%, p < 0.001). Based on the novel threshold of equipoise (individual absolute risk differences [ARD] < 4.5%), 133 patients were eligible for PCI however 23 of them underwent CABG; conversely, amongst the 67 patients where CABG was recommendation (individual ARD > 4.5%), only 19 received it., Conclusions: Despite the robustness of the risk models proposed for screening, several deviations from the recommended mode of revascularization were observed by the core laboratory among the first 200 patients with 3VD screened in the Multivessel TALENT trial., Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov reference: NCT04390672., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest. Patrick W. Serruys is serving as one of the Editorial Board members of this journal. We declare that Patrick W. Serruys had no involvement in the peer review of this article and has no access to information regarding its peer review. Full responsibility for the editorial process for this article was delegated to Peter A. McCullough and Federico Ronco. K. Ninomiya reports a grant from Abbott Medical Japan outside the submitted work. P.W. Serruys reports institutional grants from Sinomedical Sciences Technology, SMT (Sahajanand Medical technological), Philips/Volcano, Xeltis, and HeartFlow, outside the submitted work., (Copyright: © 2022 The Author(s). Published by IMR Press.)

Patients presenting with severe aortic stenosis and large aortic annuli are challenging to treat because of the size limitations of available transcatheter heart valves. In this study, we aimed to determine clinical and hemodynamic outcomes in patients presenting with large aortic annuli who underwent transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Patients from the German Aortic Valve Registry who underwent TAVI either with the Edwards Sapien (ES) or Medtronic CoreValve (MCV) systems from 2011 to 2017 were included. They were further stratified into a large (aortic annulus diameter 26 to 29 mm for ES; 26 to 30 mm for MCV) and extra-large (aortic annulus diameter >29 mm for ES; >30 mm for MCV) group and analyzed using propensity score adjustment. Extra-large was set beyond the sizing limitations according to the manufacturer's instructions for use. Patients in the large (n = 5,628) and extra-large (n = 509) groups were predominantly male (large: 92.6% vs extra-large: 91.9%). The 30-day mortality was comparable (large: 3.9% vs extra-large: 5.0%, p = 0.458). Procedure duration (large: 78.9 minutes ± 0.82 vs extra-large: 86.4 minutes ± 1.9, p <0.001) was longer in the extra-large group. Likewise, vascular complications (large: 6.2% vs extra-large: 12%, p = 0.002) and the need for a permanent pacemaker implantation (large: 18.8% vs extra-large: 26.0%, p = 0.027) were more often present in the extra-large group. Aortic regurgitation ≥II after valve implantation was numerically higher (large: 3.0% vs extra-large: 5.3%, p = 0.082) in patients with extra-large anatomy. In conclusion, patients with large and extra-large aortic annulus diameters who underwent TAVI have comparable 30-day mortality. Beyond the recommended annulus range, there is a higher risk for vascular complications and permanent pacemaker implantation., Competing Interests: Disclosures Drs. Piayda and Zeus report statistical analysis was provided by German Center for Cardiovascular Disease. Dr. Frerker reports a relation with Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein that includes consulting or advisory and has received speaker fees from Medtronic, Edwards Lifesciences, Boston Scientific, and Abbott. Dr. Bleiziffer reports a relation with Heart and Diabetes Center North Rhine-Westphalia that includes consulting or advisory and has received speaker fees from Medtronic and Boston Scientific. Dr. Zeus reports a relation with University Hospital Düsseldorf that includes consulting or advisory and has received consulting fees, travel expenses, or study honoraria from Medtronic and Edwards Lifesciences outside of this work. The remaining authors have no conflicts of interest to declare., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: Computed tomography angiography (CTA) is performed routinely in the work-up for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), and could potentially replace invasive coronary angiography (ICA) to rule out left main (LM) and proximal coronary stenosis. The objectives were to assess the diagnostic yield and accuracy of pre-TAVI CTA to detect LM and proximal coronary stenosis of ≥ 50% and ≥ 70% diameter stenosis (DS)., Methods: The DEPICT CTA database consists of individual patient data from four studies with a retrospective design that analyzed the diagnostic accuracy of pre-TAVI CTA to detect coronary stenosis, as compared with ICA. Pooled data were used to assess diagnostic accuracy to detect coronary stenosis in the left main and the three proximal coronary segments on a per-patient and a per-segment level. We included 1060 patients (mean age: 81.5 years, 42.7% male)., Results: On ICA, the prevalence of proximal stenosis was 29.0% (≥ 50% DS) and 15.7% (≥ 70% DS). Pre-TAVI CTA ruled out ≥ 50% DS in 51.6% of patients with a sensitivity of 96.4%, specificity of 71.2%, PPV of 57.7%, and NPV of 98.0%. For ≥ 70% DS, pre-TAVI CTA ruled out stenosis in 70.0% of patients with a sensitivity of 96.7%, specificity of 87.5%, PPV of 66.9%, and NPV of 99.0%., Conclusion: CTA provides high diagnostic accuracy to rule out LM and proximal coronary stenosis in patients undergoing work-up for TAVI. Clinical application of CTA as a gatekeeper for ICA would reduce the need for ICA in 52% or 70% of patients, using a threshold of ≥ 50% or ≥ 70% DS, respectively., Key Points: • Clinical application of CTA as a gatekeeper for ICA would reduce the need for ICA in 52% or 70% of TAVI patients, using a threshold of ≥ 50% or ≥ 70% diameter stenosis. • The diagnostic accuracy of CTA to exclude proximal coronary stenosis in these patients is high, with a sensitivity of 96.4% and NPV of 98.0% for a threshold of ≥ 50%, and a sensitivity of 96.7% and NPV of 99.0% for a threshold of ≥ 70% diameter stenosis. • Atrial fibrillation and heart rate did not significantly affect sensitivity and NPV. However, a heart rate of < 70 b/min during CTA was associated with a significantly improved specificity and PPV., (© 2021. The Author(s).)

Background: The role of direct oral anticoagulants as compared with vitamin K antagonists for atrial fibrillation after successful transcatheter aortic-valve replacement (TAVR) has not been well studied., Methods: We conducted a multicenter, prospective, randomized, open-label, adjudicator-masked trial comparing edoxaban with vitamin K antagonists in patients with prevalent or incident atrial fibrillation as the indication for oral anticoagulation after successful TAVR. The primary efficacy outcome was a composite of adverse events consisting of death from any cause, myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, systemic thromboembolism, valve thrombosis, or major bleeding. The primary safety outcome was major bleeding. On the basis of a hierarchical testing plan, the primary efficacy and safety outcomes were tested sequentially for noninferiority, with noninferiority of edoxaban established if the upper boundary of the 95% confidence interval for the hazard ratio did not exceed 1.38. Superiority testing of edoxaban for efficacy would follow if noninferiority and superiority were established for major bleeding., Results: A total of 1426 patients were enrolled (713 in each group). The mean age of the patients was 82.1 years, and 47.5% of the patients were women. Almost all the patients had atrial fibrillation before TAVR. The rate of the composite primary efficacy outcome was 17.3 per 100 person-years in the edoxaban group and 16.5 per 100 person-years in the vitamin K antagonist group (hazard ratio, 1.05; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.85 to 1.31; P = 0.01 for noninferiority). Rates of major bleeding were 9.7 per 100 person-years and 7.0 per 100 person-years, respectively (hazard ratio, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.03 to 1.91; P = 0.93 for noninferiority); the difference between groups was mainly due to more gastrointestinal bleeding with edoxaban. Rates of death from any cause or stroke were 10.0 per 100 person-years in the edoxaban group and 11.7 per 100 person-years in the vitamin K antagonist group (hazard ratio, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.66 to 1.11)., Conclusions: In patients with mainly prevalent atrial fibrillation who underwent successful TAVR, edoxaban was noninferior to vitamin K antagonists as determined by a hazard ratio margin of 38% for a composite primary outcome of adverse clinical events. The incidence of major bleeding was higher with edoxaban than with vitamin K antagonists. (Funded by Daiichi Sankyo; ENVISAGE-TAVI AF ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02943785.)., (Copyright © 2021 Massachusetts Medical Society.)

Background: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has become standard treatment for elderly patients with symptomatic severe aortic valve stenosis. The ACURATE neo AS study evaluates 30-day and 1-year clinical and hemodynamic outcomes in patients treated with the ACURATE neo2 valve., Methods: The primary endpoint of this single-arm multicenter study is 30-day all-cause mortality. Other key endpoints include device performance, echocardiographic measures assessed by an independent core laboratory, and VARC-2 clinical efficacy and safety endpoints through 12 months., Results: The study enrolled 120 patients (mean age 82.1 ± 4.0 years; 67.5% female, mean baseline STS score 4.8 ± 3.8%). The VARC-2 composite safety endpoint at 30 days occurred in 13.3% of patients. All-cause mortality was 3.3% at 30 days and 11.9% at 1 year. The 30-day stroke rate was 2.5% (disabling stroke 1.7%); there were no new strokes between 30 days and 12 months. The rate of permanent pacemaker implantation was 15.0% (18/120) at 30 days and 17.8% (21/120) at 1 year. No patients required re-intervention for valve-related dysfunction and there were no cases of valve thrombosis or endocarditis. Patients demonstrated significant improvement in mean aortic valve gradient (baseline 38.9 ± 13.1 mmHg, 1 year 7.8 ± 3.5 mmHg; P < 0.001 in a paired analysis). In the overall population, paravalvular leak was evaluated at 1 year as none/trace in 60.5%, mild in 37.0%, and moderate in 2.5%; no patients had severe PVL., Conclusions: One-year outcomes from the ACURATE neo AS study support the safety and performance of TAVI with the ACURATE neo2 valve., (© 2021. The Author(s).)

Background: Severe tricuspid regurgitation (TR) has limited treatment options and is associated with high morbidity and mortality., Aims: We evaluated the safety and effectiveness of the Cardioband tricuspid valve reconstruction system from the ongoing European single-arm, multicentre, prospective TriBAND post-market clinical follow-up study., Methods: Eligible patients had chronic symptomatic functional TR despite diuretic therapy and were deemed candidates for transcatheter tricuspid repair by the local Heart Team., Results: Sixty-one patients had ≥severe functional TR. At baseline, 85% of patients were in NYHA Class III-IV, 94% had ≥severe TR (core laboratory-assessed) with 6.8% EuroSCORE II and 53% LVEF. Device success was 96.7%. At discharge, 59% (p<0.001) of patients achieved ≤moderate TR and 78% had at least one grade TR reduction. At 30 days, all-cause mortality and composite MAE rates were 1.6% and 19.7%, respectively; septolateral annular diameter was reduced by 20%, where 69% of patients achieved ≤moderate TR and 85% of patients had at least one grade TR reduction (all p<0.001). Mid-RVEDD, RA volume, and IVC diameter decreased by 10% (p=0.005), 21% (p<0.001), and 11% (p=0.022), respectively; 74% were in NYHA Class I-II (p<0.001) with improvements in overall KCCQ score by 17 points (p<0.001)., Conclusions: In the TriBAND study, the Cardioband tricuspid system demonstrated favourable outcomes at discharge and 30 days in a challenging patient population with symptomatic ≥severe functional TR. Results showed significant reductions in annular diameter and TR severity, accompanied by early evidence of right heart remodelling and improvements in functional status and quality of life.

Objectives: To determine the 5-year outcome in patients treated by isolated transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) or surgical aortic valve replacement (sAVR)-a prospective observational cohort study., Methods: A total of 18 010 patients were included (n = 8942 TAVI and n = 9068 sAVR) in the German Aortic Valve Registry (GARY) who were treated in 2011 and 2012 at 92 sites in central Germany. Eligible patients with TAVI and sAVR were matched using propensity scores in a nearest-neighbour approach. Patients with repeat procedures or unequivocal indication for one treatment option (e.g. frailty) were excluded (n = 4785 for TAVI and n = 2 for sAVR). This led to 13 223 patients (4157 TAVI and 9066 sAVR) as an unmatched subcohort. The main outcome measure was the 5-year all-cause mortality., Results: TAVI patients were significantly older (80.9 ± 6.1 vs 68.5 ± 11.1 years, P < 0.001), had a higher Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) score (6.3 ± 4.9 vs 2.6 ± 3.0, P < 0.001) and a higher 5-year all-cause mortality (49.8% vs 16.5%, P < 0.0001). There was no major difference in in-hospital stroke, in-hospital myocardial infarction, or temporary and chronic dialysis. In the propensity score-matched group (n = 3640), there were 763 deaths (41.9%) among 1820 TAVI patients compared with 552 (30.3%) among 1820 treated with sAVR during the 5-year follow-up (hazard ratio 1.51, 95% confidence interval 1.35-1.68; P < 0.0001). New pacemaker implantation was performed in 448 patients (24.6%) after TAVI and in 201 (11.0%) after sAVR (P < 0.0001)., Conclusions: The 5-year follow-up data show that TAVI patients were significantly older and had a higher STS score than sAVR patients. After propensity score matching, TAVI with early-generation prosthesis was associated with significantly higher 5-year all-cause mortality than sAVR., (© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: The aim of this study was to characterize the feasibility of coronary angiography (CA) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in acute settings among patients who have undergone transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR)., Background: Impaired coronary access after TAVR may be challenging and particularly in acute settings could have deleterious consequences., Methods: In this international registry, data from patients with prior TAVR requiring urgent or emergent CA were retrospectively collected. A total of 449 patients from 25 sites with acute coronary syndromes (89.1%) and other acute cardiovascular situations (10.9%) were included., Results: Success rates were high for CA of the right coronary artery (98.3%) and left coronary artery (99.3%) and were higher among patients with short stent-frame prostheses (SFPs) than in those with long SFPs for CA of the right coronary artery (99.6% vs 95.9%; P = 0.005) but not for CA of the left coronary artery (99.7% vs 98.7%; P = 0.24). PCI of native coronary arteries was successful in 91.4% of cases and independent of valve type (short SFP 90.4% vs long SFP 93.4%; P = 0.44). Guide engagement failed in 6 patients, of whom 3 underwent emergent coronary artery bypass grafting and another 3 died in the hospital. Among patients requiring revascularization of native vessels, independent predictors of 30-day all-cause mortality were prior diabetes, cardiogenic shock, and failed PCI but not valve type or success of coronary engagement., Conclusions: CA or PCI after TAVR in acute settings is usually successful, but selective coronary engagement may be more challenging in the presence of long SFPs. Among patients requiring PCI, prior diabetes, cardiogenic shock, and failed PCI were predictors of early mortality., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures Dr Kim has received proctor and speaker fees from Boston Scientific, Abbott, Edwards Lifesciences, Medtronic, and Meril Lifesciences. Dr Ludwig has received travel compensation from Edwards Lifesciences. Dr Möllmann has received proctor fees and/or speaker honoraria from Abbott, Biotronik, Edwards Lifesciences, and Boston Scientific. Dr Leuschner has received speaker honoraria from Medtronic. Dr Amat-Santos is a proctor for Boston Scientific; Dr Dabrowski has received proctor fees from Boston Scientific; and has received speaker fees from Boston Scientific, Abbott, Edwards Lifesciences, and Medtronic. Dr Rudolph has received proctor fees and/or lecture honoraria from Boston Scientific, Edwards Lifesciences, Medtronic, and Abbott. Dr Toggweiler is a consultant and/or proctor for New Valve Technology/Biosensors, Boston Scientific, Abbott, Medtronic, Carag, and Medira; has received institutional research grants from Boston Scientific and Fumedica; and holds equity in Hi-D Imaging. Dr Frank is a consultant for Edwards Lifesciences and Medtronic; and has received an institutional research grant from Edwards Lifesciences. Dr Webb is a consultant to Edwards Lifesciences; and has received research grants from Abbott, Boston Scientific, and Medtronic. Dr Barbanti is a consultant for Edwards Lifesciences; and an advisory board member for Medtronic. Dr Pilgrim has received research grants to the institution from Biotronik and Boston Scientific; has received speaker fees from Biotronik and Boston Scientific; is a consultant for HighLife SAS; and is a proctor for Medtronic and Boston Scientific. Dr Seiffert is a consultant for JenaValve and Boston Scientific; has received travel compensation from Abbott Vascular, Edwards Lifesciences, JenaValve, Boston Scientific, and Biotronik; and has received speaker honoraria from Medtronic. Dr Werner is a proctor for Medtronic; and has received speaker honoraria from Edwards Lifesciences, Boston Scientific, Medtronic. Dr Allali has received proctor and speaker fees from Boston Scientific. Dr Makkar has received consultant fees from Abbott; and has received research grants and consulting and speaker fees from Edwards Lifesciences, Abbott, Medtronic, and Boston Scientific. Dr Leuschner has received speaker honoraria from Medtronic. Dr Nef has received proctor or speaker honoraria from Abbott, Boston Scientific, Edwards Lifesciences, and Medtronic. Dr Hamm is an advisory board member for Medtronic. Dr Sinning has received research grants from Boston Scientific, Edwards, and Medtronic; and has received speaker honoraria from Abbott, Abiomed, Boston Scientific, Edwards, and Medtronic. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2021 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has revolutionized the treatment of patients with severe aortic stenosis and is now standard of care for high surgical risk patients and a valid alternative strategy in intermediate risk patients. Recently, TAVR has shown excellent results in low-risk patients, indicating an imminent extension toward this population. Improvements in procedural outcomes are the result of increasing operator experience, sophisticated imaging for procedural planning but also due to the continuous evolution of transcatheter heart valves developed to minimize procedural complications. 'Next-generation' valves are currently available, among them the self-expanding ACURATE neo. Here, the technical details and clinical outcomes of the ACURATE neo are reviewed, comparative data with other 'next-generation' valves and potential advantages and disadvantages are discussed.

Interventional cardiovascular medicine has seen constant progress over the last few decades. Since the first angiograms and percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty were carried out, this progress has been tremendous and has led to a substantial decline in cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. The purpose of this article is to report and review the latest developments and evidence in robotics-assisted percutaneous coronary intervention (rPCI) and its potential future applications, opportunities, and limitations. Contemporary evidence shows that rPCI can lead to a significant reduction in radiation exposure as well as medical hazards for cardiologists. Rates of device and procedural success remain high and there is no evidence of a disadvantage for the patient. The accuracy of implantation with a reduced geographic mismatch is a further advantage that can result in a higher quality of treatment. Even in complex coronary lesions and procedures, rPCI seems to be safe and efficient. The latest developments include telestenting over hundreds of kilometers from a remote platform. Currently, the main limitations are the absence of large-scale randomized trials for the valid assessment of the benefits and disadvantages of rPCI as well as the technical limitations of the currently available rPCI systems. rPCI is a forward-looking innovation in cardiology that is applicable to a wide range of coronary interventions. Despite the present lack of knowledge and the limited data concerning the outcome for the patient, the available literature reveals promising results that should lead to improvements for physicians and patients.

Objectives: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a key risk factor in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) or surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). We analysed the impact of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and CKD stages on their mid-term survival., Methods: Data from 29 893 patients enrolled in the German Aortic Valve registry from January 2011 to December 2015 receiving TAVI (n = 12 834) or SAVR (n = 17 059) at 88 sites were included. The impact of renal impairment, as measured by eGFR and CKD stages, was investigated. The primary end-point was 1-year cumulative all-cause mortality., Results: Higher CKD stages were significantly associated to lower in-hospital, 30-day- and 1-year survival rates. Both TAVI- and SAVR-treated patients in CKD 3a, 3b, 4 and 5 stages showed significant and gradually increasing HR values for 1-year all-cause mortality. The same trend persisted in multivariable analysis, although HR values for CKD 3a and 5 did not reach significance in TAVI patients, whereas CKD 4 + 5 did not reach statistical significance in SAVR. Likewise, eGFR as a continuous variable was a significant predictor for 1-year mortality, with the best cut-off points being 47.4 ml/min/1.73 m2 for TAVI and 59.8 ml/min/1.73 m2 for SAVR. Significant 8.6% and 9.0% increases in 1-year mortality were observed for every 5-ml reduction in eGFR for TAVI and SAVR, respectively., Conclusions: CKD ≥3b and CKD ≥3a are the independent major risk factors for mortality in patients undergoing TAVI and SAVR, respectively. In the overall population of patients with severe aortic stenosis, an appropriate stratification based on CKD substage may contribute to a better selection of patients suitable for such therapies., (© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.)

Background: In acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock the use of mechanical circulatory support devices remains controversial and data from randomized clinical trials are very limited. Extracorporeal life support (ECLS) - venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation - provides the strongest hemodynamic support in addition to oxygenation. However, despite increasing use it has not yet been properly investigated in randomized trials. Therefore, a prospective randomized adequately powered clinical trial is warranted., Study Design: The ECLS-SHOCK trial is a 420-patient controlled, international, multicenter, randomized, open-label trial. It is designed to compare whether treatment with ECLS in addition to early revascularization with percutaneous coronary intervention or alternatively coronary artery bypass grafting and optimal medical treatment is beneficial in comparison to no-ECLS in patients with severe infarct-related cardiogenic shock. Patients will be randomized in a 1:1 fashion to one of the two treatment arms. The primary efficacy endpoint of ECLS-SHOCK is 30-day mortality. Secondary outcome measures such as hemodynamic, laboratory, and clinical parameters will serve as surrogate endpoints for prognosis. Furthermore, a longer follow-up at 6 and 12 months will be performed including quality of life assessment. Safety endpoints include peripheral ischemic vascular complications, bleeding and stroke., Conclusions: The ECLS-SHOCK trial will address essential questions of efficacy and safety of ECLS in addition to early revascularization in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare outcomes of transcatheter and surgical aortic valve implantation in chronic dialysis patients with aortic valve stenosis (AS)., Background: Chronic dialysis patients undergoing heart valve surgery are at higher risk for morbidity and mortality. Whether interventional techniques can reduce this risk is unclear because dialysis patients have thus far been excluded from randomized trials., Methods: Chronic dialysis patients with AS enrolled in the German Aortic Valve Registry (GARY) between 2012 and 2015 were analyzed to compare transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI n = 661) with surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR n = 457). Propensity scores for inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) were used to adjust the comparison of the two treatment groups for potential confounders., Results: TAVI patients were older (78 ± 7.3 vs. 69 ± 10.2 years, p < 0.01, unadjusted) and had more comorbidities. Mortality at 1 year was the same (TAVI: 33.4% vs. SAVR 35.0%, p = 0.72, IPTW-adjusted) while it was lower with TAVI at 30 days (8.6% vs. 15.0%, p = 0.02, IPTW-adjusted). TAVI patients required more pacemaker implantation and showed more aortic regurgitation. SAVR patients required more blood transfusions and had longer hospital stay. Diabetes mellitus, atrial fibrillation, previous PCI, urgent procedure and EuroSCORE were associated with elevated 30-day mortality. Atrial fibrillation and older age were independent risk factor of 1-year mortality in both groups., Conclusions: Chronic dialysis patients with AS undergoing TAVI or SAVR had the same 1-year mortality, although survival at 30 days was better with TAVI. These results suggest that TAVI may improve peri-procedural outcomes.

The aim of the present study was to analyze the size of the preoperatively calculated defect volume of MRONJ patients (medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw) and to develop a computer-aided tool based on techniques of AI (artificial intelligence) that facilitates diagnostics of MRONJ. For this purpose, on the basis of 3D (three-dimensional) data sets of 175 MRONJ patients, the outline of the necrosis was marked with the software iPlan 3.0.5 (BrainLAB AG) thus determining the respective volume. The correlation of this volume with other 31 collected parameters was analyzed retrospectively. There was a significant correlation between the defect volume on the one hand, and the MRONJ stage, the number of performed operations, and the therapy invasiveness on the other hand. Furthermore, it could be shown that in one third of the cases no defects could be recognized in the 2D imaging by panoramic radiograph,  while in the 3D data sets defects already had been demarcated. On the basis of these data, a computer-aided tool based on the principles of AI was developed and validated, which might allow the automated calculation of the 3D defect extension and classification of the MRONJ cases into a ranking system. In conclusion, preparation of a 3D image can be recommended for reliably making the diagnosis "MRONJ." Moreover, knowledge of the exact defect volume serves as a decision-making aid with regard to the choice of therapy, ensures intraoperative certitude, and allows an assessment of the prognosis., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting Interests: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article., (© The Author(s) 2020.)

Aims: Both surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) and transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) are established options to treat aortic valve stenosis. We present the outcome of the complete cohort of all patients undergoing SAVR or TAVI in Germany during the calendar year 2019., Methods and Results: Data concerning all isolated aortic valve procedures performed in Germany in 2019 were retrieved from the mandatory nationwide quality control program: 22,973 transvascular (TV)-TAVI procedures, 7905 isolated SAVR (iSAVR), and 1413 transapical (TA)-TAVI. Data was complete in 99.9% (n = 32,156). In-hospital mortality after TV-TAVI (2.3%) was significantly lower when compared with iSAVR (2.8%, p = 0.007) or TA-TAVI (6.3%; p < 0.001). Expected mortality was calculated with a new version of the German Aortic valve score (AKL Score) based on the data of either catheter-based (AKL-CATH) or surgical (AKL-CHIR) aortic valve replacements in Germany in 2018. TV-TAVI and iSAVR both showed lower observed mortality in 2019 than expected based on their respective performance in 2018, yielding an observed/expected (O/E) mortality ratio < 1. This was particularly apparent for patients at low risk. After exclusion of emergency procedures, in-hospital mortality after TV-TAVI (2.1%) and after iSAVR (2.1%) was identical, even though patients undergoing TV-TAVI showed a considerably higher perioperative risk profile., Conclusion: After excluding emergency procedures, in-hospital mortality of TV-TAVI and iSAVR in 2019 in Germany was identical. In 2019, TV-TAVI and iSAVR both show lower matched mortality ratios compared with 2018, which suggests technical improvements of both therapies.

Aims: Paravalvular leakage (PVL) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is a common complication in patients with bicuspid aortic valve (BAV). However, predictors and mechanisms of PVL are not well understood in this subset. The aim of this study was to analyse determinants and mechanisms of PVL in BAV and tricuspid aortic valve (TAV)., Methods and Results: Of the 2394 consecutive patients undergoing transfemoral TAVR using new-generation valves at our centre, we identified 242 cases with BAV. To adjust for baseline differences, we performed 3 : 1 propensity score matching (TAVPS  n = 726). We analysed the aortic root anatomy and calcification as well as the number, circumferential distribution, and predilection sites of PVL using pre-procedural multidetector computed tomography and post-TAVR echocardiography. In the matched cohort, the incidence of PVL ≥mild (BAV 51.9% vs. TAVPS 51.7%; P = 0.955) and PVL ≥moderate (BAV 5.0% vs. TAVPS 3.7%; P = 0.393), the circumferential distribution, and independent predictors were similar between BAV and TAVPS. Both the presence of peri-annular calcium chunks or LVOT calcification were highly associated with PVL in BAV and TAVPS patients, whereas in BAV patients neither the presence of a calcium bridge nor the volume of its calcification was related to PVL. Notably, the spatial localization of these lesions did not necessarily match the circumferential leak position., Conclusion: The incidence, circumferential distribution, predilection sites, and predictors of PVL were similar in matched population of BAV and TAVPS patients undergoing transfemoral TAVR using new-generation devices. These novel findings suggest a common underlying mechanism of PVL in both entities., (Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. © The Author(s) 2021. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background: Rates of permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI) have been low using the self-expanding ACURATE neo device, but data regarding risk factors of PPI for this specific device are scarce., Methods: The study cohort consisted of patients (n = 1000) with severe aortic stenosis undergoing transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) using the ACURATE neo prosthesis in our center between May 2012 and December 2019. For the present analysis, we excluded patients with previous permanent pacemaker (n = 110), high-grade AV block prior to TAVI (n = 3), and patients requiring conversion to surgical valve replacement (n = 4) or the implantation of a second prosthesis as valve-in-valve (n = 15). Preexisting conduction abnormalities were determined, and the implantation depth of the prosthesis was measured on final angiography. Differences across quartiles based on the original consecutive cohort were analyzed with respect to implantation depth and PPI rate. Predictors of PPI were identified using logistic regression., Results: The PPI rate was 10%. Preexisting AV block I°, right bundle branch block (RBBB), and the implantation depth were independent predictors of PPI. Across quartiles, the implantation depth differed significantly with lowest values in the last quartile, whereas differences of PPI rates across quartiles were not statistically significant, but showed a notable decrease in the last quartile., Conclusion: Preexisting RBBB, AV block I°, and low implantation depth were independent predictors of PPI following TAVI using the ACURATE neo device. Instead of deliberately aiming at a high position, avoidance of a low implantation depth may represent a reasonable compromise to reduce the rate of PPI without increasing the risk of malpositioning., (© 2020 The Authors. Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Aims: During the COVID-19 pandemic, hospital admissions for cardiac care have declined. However, effects on mortality are unclear. Thus, we sought to evaluate the impact of the lockdown period in central Germany on overall and cardiovascular deaths. Simultaneously we looked at catheterization activities in the same region., Methods and Results: Data from 22 of 24 public health-authorities in central Germany were aggregated during the pandemic related lockdown period and compared to the same time period in 2019. Information on the total number of deaths and causes of death, including cardiovascular mortality, were collected. Additionally, we compared rates of hospitalization (n = 5178) for chronic coronary syndrome (CCS), acute coronary syndrome (ACS), and out of hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) in 26 hospitals in this area. Data on 5,984 deaths occurring between March 23, 2020 and April 26, 2020 were evaluated. In comparison to the reference non-pandemic period in 2019 (deaths: n = 5832), there was a non-significant increase in all-cause mortality of 2.6% [incidence rate ratio (IRR) 1.03, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.99-1.06; p = 0.16]. Cardiovascular and cardiac mortality increased significantly by 7.6% (IRR 1.08, 95%-CI 1.01-1.14; p = 0.02) and by 11.8% (IRR 1.12, 95%-CI 1.05-1.19; p < 0.001), respectively. During the same period, our data revealed a drop in cardiac catherization procedures., Conclusion: During the COVID-19-related lockdown a significant increase in cardiovascular mortality was observed in central Germany, whereas catherization activities were reduced. The mechanisms underlying both of these observations should be investigated further in order to better understand the effects of a pandemic-related lockdown and social-distancing restrictions on cardiovascular care and mortality.

Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate very long-term results after unrestricted everolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffolds (BRS) implantation., Background: Previous randomized studies mainly included selected patients differing from those seen during daily routine and long-term data from all-comers registries are sparse., Methods: Consecutive patients undergoing BRS implantation were included in this observational, single center study. Clinical follow-up was conducted up to 5 years. Endpoint of interest was the composite of target lesion failure (TLF), including target-vessel myocardial infarction and target lesion revascularization and cardiac death. Furthermore, ARC-defined scaffold thrombosis (ScT) were assessed., Results: A total of 176 patients with a median age of 64 (55 - 72) years were analyzed, of which 59.6% presented an acute coronary syndrome. A total of 183 mainly complex lesions (55.8%) were treated. At 5 years, the rate for TLF was 21.6%. Definite or probable ScT rate was 4.1%. The rate of ScT within the first year was 2.8% and afterwards 1.2%. Notably, no ScT was seen later than 2 years., Conclusions: Although this real-world registry displays high rates of clinical events during long-term follow-up, no ScT was seen after 2 years., (© 2020 The Authors. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)