151. Sex disparities in diagnosis of bladder cancer after initial presentation with hematuria: A nationwide claims-based investigation
- Author
-
Gary D. Steinberg, Christopher S. Lyttle, Michael C. Large, Benjamin Vekhter, and Joshua A. Cohn
- Subjects
Gynecology ,Cancer Research ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Bladder cancer ,medicine.diagnostic_test ,Relative survival ,business.industry ,Retrospective cohort study ,Cystoscopy ,Malignancy ,medicine.disease ,Oncology ,Internal medicine ,Cohort ,medicine ,Stage (cooking) ,Microscopic hematuria ,business - Abstract
There were an estimated 73,510 incident cases of bladder cancer in the United States in 2012, with 55,600 and 17,910 cases in males and females, respectively (3.1 to 1 ratio).1,2 Of the 14,880 estimated deaths from bladder cancer, 10,510 were men and 4,370 women (2.4 to 1 ratio),2 demonstrating the disproportionate mortality:incidence ratio for women that is well-documented in the literature.3–7 Specifically, a study by the EUROCARE Working Group8 demonstrated a 5% absolute decreased 5-year survival for women compared to men, controlling for age and expected mortality. This phenomenon was unique to bladder cancer, as the EUROCARE study found that women appeared to have a significant survival advantage for cancers of the head and neck, esophagus, stomach, liver, and pancreas. The mechanisms for increased mortality in women with bladder cancer are not completely understood. Although advanced stage of presentation has been hypothesized, a review of the SEER database by Mungan et al. demonstrated a 5-year overall relative survival advantage for males across all stages of disease.5 Studies evaluating disparities in aggressive treatment are mixed and do not appear to explain the disparity in prognosis,9,10 nor does in-hospital mortality following aggressive therapy.11 However, for both men and women, it has been established that delays in diagnosis and treatment (specifically, a delay >6 months for diagnosis12 and >12 weeks from diagnosis to cystectomy13–16) adversely impact survival. Furthermore, recent studies suggest that relative to men, women may be at greater risk of delays in diagnosis17 and presentation with advanced disease.18 Gross hematuria is the most prognostic clinical sign of underlying urologic malignancy, with urothelial cell carcinoma present in 13% to 34.5% of cases.19,20 Microscopic hematuria is associated with malignancy in 0.5% to 10.5% of cases.20–23 As such, even in cases of asymptomatic microscopic hematuria, the American Urological Association Guidelines recommend a thorough work-up for malignancy, consisting of upper tract imaging and cystoscopy, following rule-out of obvious benign causes.24 In patients 40–59 years of age, gross hematuria carries a positive predictive value (PPV) for urologic cancer that is actually higher for women than men (6.4% vs. 3.6%).25 Nonetheless, women presenting with hematuria are less likely to see a urologist, with one study demonstrating men to be 65% more likely to receive a urologic referral.26 This is thought to be related to the differential assumption of a benign diagnosis in women.27 A recent study of patients ultimately diagnosed with bladder cancer found women to be less likely to have undergone prompt urologic consultation for their presenting symptoms and were more likely to have received 3 or more courses of antibiotics.28 If women are more likely to die from bladder cancer than men at any stage as the literature suggests,8 and that delay in diagnosis and treatment adversely impacts survival,12,14–16 timely diagnosis of bladder cancer in women is of utmost importance. Our study aims to evaluate gender disparities in the timing from clinical presentation with hematuria to the diagnosis of bladder cancer in a large nationwide cohort.
- Published
- 2013