Search

Flow diverter (FD) is increasingly used in the management of wide necked cerebral aneurysms. Despite a reported lower efficacy in middle cerebral artery (MCA) aneurysms, they are still being utilised. Microsurgery is best considered as an index treatment, but can also be a safe and effective treatment when encountering a persistent MCA aneurysm after prior FD. As there is a paucity in literature and more cases of failed FD are expected to appear, we want to add our experience to the existing literature. The microsurgical management of a persistent MCA bifurcation aneurysm, 3 years after a p48 MW HPC Flow Diverter (phenox GmbH, Bochum Germany) insertion is reported and the relevant literature discussed.

Background The Pipeline Flex Embolization Device (PED) with Shield Technology (PED‐Shield) is a third‐generation flow diverting stents with surface modification designed to reduce platelet adhesion and thrombogenicity. We report the long‐term safety and effectiveness of the PED‐Shield in the treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms in an Australian cohort. Methods SCOPE‐AUS (Safety and Clinical Effectiveness Of Pipeline Shield Embolization Device for Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms in Australia) is a multicenter, single‐arm, retrospective study of patients with unruptured intracranial aneurysms treated with the PED‐Shield flow diverting stents at 3 high‐volume neurointervention centers in Australia between May 1, 2015, and June 30, 2018, evaluating safety and efficacy. The primary outcome was neurologic adverse event or neurologic‐related death at 1 year, and the secondary outcome was long‐term complete aneurysm occlusion. Results A total of 238 patients (mean age 55.8±11.0 years, 73.1% [174/238] female) and 278 aneurysms were treated via 247 procedures. Two (0.7%) aneurysms were retreated during the 18‐month follow‐up. Overall occlusion rates at 18 months or at last follow‐up imaging were 92.5% (233/252). There were 35 (14.7%) total primary end point events. The 12‐month neurologic morbidity and mortality rates were 3.8% (9/238) and 1.3% (3/238), respectively. For the subgroup of internal carotid artery aneurysms, mortality (0.7%) and morbidity (2.0%) rates were low, and the complete occlusion rate was 92.5% (147/155). Conclusions In this multicenter study, which includes a wide variety of both distal bifurcation and proximal unruptured intracranial aneurysms, the occlusion rates and safety outcomes of the PED‐Shield flow diverting stent demonstrate a high proportion of complete aneurysm occlusion, extremely low retreatment rates, and low complication rates.

Purpose: To investigate the e􀀀ect and safety of flow diverters in the treatment of unruptured dissecting intracranial aneurysms of the vertebral artery in comparison with stent-assisted coiling or stenting alone. Materials and methods: Patients with unruptured dissecting intracranial aneurysms of the vertebral artery treated with the flow diverter, stent-assisted coiling, or stenting alone were retrospectively enrolled. The clinical data were analyzed and compared. Results: Twenty-five patients were enrolled in the flow diversion group and 42 patients in the stenting group. Twenty-six flow diverters were deployed in the flow diversion group. Immediate angiography revealed contrast agent retention within the aneurysm cavity in all patients. In the stenting group, 48 stents were deployed, and immediate angiographic outcome showed O'Kelly-Marotta (OKM) grade D in 18 (42.9%) aneurysms, grade C in 16 (38.1%), and grade B in 8 (19.0%). Periprocedural ischemic complications of thrombosis occurred in two (4.8%) patients and were treated with thrombolysis. In the flow diversion group, 19 (76%) patients underwent angiographic follow-up 3-46 (median 24) months after the procedure, with the OKM grade D in 11 (57.9%) patients, C in two (10.5%), and B in six (31.6%). The aneurysm recurrence rate was zero, and all diverters remained patent. Asymptomatic instent stenosis occurred in two (10.5%) patients. In seven of the ten patients with mild or moderate parent artery stenosis before the procedure who experienced angiographic follow-up, the stenosis was improved in five (71.4%) patients. In the stenting group, angiographic follow-up was carried out in 33 (78.6%) patients 6-58months (median 34) after the procedure, withOKMgrade D in 22 (66.7%) patients, grade C in five (15.2%), grade B in three (9.1%), and aneurysm recurrence (grade B, with increased contrast agent into the aneurysmcavity) in three (9.1%). Five (16.7%) patients experienced asymptomatic instent stenosis, and six of the 12 patients (50%) with parent artery stenosis were improved. Conclusion: Flow diverters with or without selective adjunctive coiling for the treatment of unruptured dissecting intracranial aneurysms of the vertebral artery may be safe and e􀀀ective with good occlusion e􀀀ects not inferior to those of stent-assisted coiling and stenting alone even though the long-term e􀀀ect still warrants confirmation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Flow diverters (FDs) for the treatment of basilar artery (BA) aneurysms remain controversial. In this study, we report our initial experience of flow diversion for treatment of this pathology. Methods: Consecutive patients with an aneurysm of the BA that was treated by implantation of the FD were included in our retrospective study. Procedural complications, aneurysmocclusion, and a functional outcome were evaluated. FD placement in BA for aneurysm treatment reported in the literature was also reviewed and summarized. Results: Sixteen patients with 16 BA aneurysms were treated by FD implantation with (n = 8) or without (n = 8) adjunctive coiling. The Tubridge was used in 13 (81.3%) and Pipeline in 3 (18.8%) procedures. Average aneurysm size was 15.7mm. Four aneurysms were located at the basilar apex, six at the basilar trunk, and six at the vertebrobasilar junction. Three patients experienced procedural complications (18.8%), including two ischemic strokes and one hydrocephalus, with resultant mortality in one case (6.3%). Median follow-up was 7.7 months and available for 15 aneurysms. Complete/near-complete occlusion was seen in 13 (86.7%) aneurysms. Conclusion: In our initial experience, flow diversion is feasible and safe in the treatment of BA aneurysms with promising occlusion rates at mid-term follow-up. Larger cohort studies are required to validate these results. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Flow diverters (FD) have become the mainstay for the endovascular treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIA). Most FD procedures are performed under general anesthesia, and the influence of local anesthesia (LA) on outcomes remains unknown. This study evaluated the results of FD placement under LA. Data of patients treated for FD under LA between August 2016 and January 2022 were analyzed retrospectively. A good outcome was defined as a modified Rankin scale score of 0–2. Major stroke, steno-occlusive events of FD, mortality, and satisfactory aneurysm occlusion were also evaluated. In total, 169 patients undertook 182 treatments (139 [82%) female, mean age 61 ± 11 years). The median maximum aneurysm size was 9.5 mm (interquartile range 6.1-14 mm). A flow re-directed endoluminal device and pipeline embolization device were used in 103 (57%) and 78 (43%) treatments. One patient (0.59%) experienced major stroke, and steno-occlusive events were observed in four patients (2.4%). A good outcome at 90 days was obtained in 164 patients (98%), and one patient died (0.59% mortality). During the median follow-up period of 345 days (interquartile range 176–366 days), satisfactory aneurysm occlusion was observed in 126 of 160 aneurysms (79%). Our results suggest that FD placement under LA is a safe and effective treatment for UIA. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The Tubridge flow diverter (FD) (MicroPort Medical Co. Ltd., Shanghai, China) is a novel device aimed at reconstructing the parent artery and eliminating the aneurysm. Numerical simulations based on virtual FD deployment allow the assessment of the complex nature of aneurismal flow changes before the actual intervention but are demanding on computational resources. Here, we evaluate an alternative strategy of modeling FD effects for the Tubridge system using a porous medium. The goal of this study is to reduce demands on time and complexity of the simulation procedure for applications in clinical research. Ten patient-specific aneurysm models were reconstructed from retrospectively collected diagnostic 3-dimensional digital subtraction angiographic images. Virtual FDs were deployed (SolidWorks, Dassault Systems, Concord, Massachusetts, USA; Meshmixer, Autodesk, San Rafael, California, USA) and corresponding porous medium patches were constructed at the ostium with a research computational fluid dynamics prototype (Siemens Healthineers, Forchheim, Germany). Hemodynamic conditions were simulated in 2 approaches. Hemodynamics inside the aneurysm based on these 2 approaches were compared. Both approaches yielded similar results. Mean wall shear stress and mean pressure of the aneurysmal wall correlated significantly (r = 0.8, r = 1.0, P < 0.05) as did mean velocity and mean pressure at a region inside the aneurysm, at the ostium and at a cross section containing the main vertex (for velocities r = 0.9; for pressures r = 1.0, P < 0.05). The use of porous medium patches reduced the preparation and simulation time together by approximately 50%. Using a porous medium approach yields comparable mean values for hemodynamic alterations compared to direct virtual FD simulations. Additionally, the porous medium approach greatly reduced the modeling complexity and computation time. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We report a case of an intracranial aneurysm of the left posterior inferior cerebellar artery, which was treated with a flow-diverting stent. One year later at follow-up, the patient presented with new symptoms due to mass effect in the posterior fossa and a 3-fold enlargement of the aneurysm. Digital subtraction angiography showed an increase in size of the aneurysm with jet flow into the sac. Optic coherent tomography was performed during the procedure, demonstrating a failure of endothelization of the stent with a focal 1-mm opening at the neck of the aneurysm, resulting in jet flow. Parent vessel sacrifice was performed by coiling of the left vertebral artery. The patient had a codominant right vertebral artery and tolerated the procedure well. Two years later, follow-up magnetic resonance angiography showed significant decrease of the size of the aneurysm and symptom regression, with a modified Rankin scale of 1 (functionally independent). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: The morphological changes of the pipeline embolization device (PED; Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA), such as delayed migration or foreshortening, can relate to the incomplete occlusion of aneurysms. Case presentation: A 30-year-old man with a giant cavernous carotid artery aneurysm was treated with two PEDs using the overlapping technique. Six months after treatment, follow-up angiography showed morphological changes of the PEDs and residual flow into the aneurysm. Chronological cone-beam computed tomography fusion imaging clearly revealed the dynamic foreshortening of the first PED and the disconnection of both PEDs, so we decided to implant an additional PED. Conclusion: This case illustrates that a three-dimensional understanding can be useful for assessing the cause of treatment failure or recurrence. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Quantitative magnetic resonance angiography and non-invasive optimal vessel analysis serve as powerful tools to collect and analyze hemodynamic data from pipeline embolization patients. At our institution, patients receive post-embolization quantitative magnetic resonance angiography within 24 h of treatment and within 6 months for follow-up to evaluate pipeline patency. Here, we aim to elucidate the long-term hemodynamic changes following pipeline embolization device placement and report two cases in which in-stent stenosis was detected. Methods: Medical records of patients who underwent pipeline embolization device placement for an internal carotid artery aneurysm between 2017 and 2019 were reviewed. Patients who received post-procedure NOVA and follow-up NOVA were included in the study (n = 32). Location and size of aneurysm, number of pipeline embolization device deployed, and complications were collected along with the non-invasive optimal vessel analysis report (flow volume rate (ml/min), mean, systolic, and diastolic flow velocities (cm/s), and vessel diameter (mm)). Internal carotid artery vessel flow rate was measured proximal to the pipeline embolization device. Derivations of hemodynamic parameters (pulsatility index, Lindegaard ratio, and wall shear stress) were calculated. Results: The middle cerebral artery mean and diastolic flow velocities were significantly lower on the follow-up NOVA compared to the post-procedure NOVA. Moreover, follow-up NOVA demonstrated lower middle cerebral artery wall shear stress on the side with flow diversion compared to the post-procedure NOVA. In-stent stenosis, requiring intervention, was detected in two patients on follow-up NOVA. One patient had a successful balloon angioplasty of the stented internal carotid artery that resolved her stenosis. However, the second patient developed progressive stenosis and expired despite intervention. Conclusion: Long-term hemodynamic adaptations post-pipeline embolization device demonstrate decreased wall shear stress and decreased mean and diastolic flow velocities in the distal middle cerebral artery, which suggest decreasing velocity of blood flow with endothelialization of the device. Furthermore, follow-up NOVA is a useful tool for detecting potential flow-related complications such as in-stent stenosis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: This study comparatively analyzed the hemodynamic changes resulting from various simulated stent-assisted embolization treatments to explore an optimal treatment strategy for intracranial vertebral artery fusiform aneurysms. An actual vertebral fusiform aneurysm case treated by large coil post-stenting (PLCS) was used as a control. Materials and Methods: A single case of an intracranial vertebral artery fusiform aneurysm underwent a preoperative and eight postoperative finite element treatment simulations: PLCS [single and dual Low-profile Visualized Intraluminal Support (LVIS)], Jailing technique (single and dual LVIS both simulated twice, Pipeline Embolization Device (PED) with or without large coils (LCs). Qualitative and quantitative assessments were performed to analyze the most common hemodynamic risk factors for recurrence. Results: Jailing technique and PED-only had a high residual flow volume (RFV) and wall shear stress (WSS) on the large curvature of the blood flow impingement region. Quantitative analysis determined that PLSC and PED had a lower RFV compared to preoperative than did the jailing technique [PED+LC 2.46% < PLCS 1.2 (dual LVIS) 4.75% < PLCS 1.1 (single LVIS) 6.34% < PED 6.58% < Jailing 2.2 12.45% < Jailing 1.2 12.71% < Jailing 1.1 14.28% < Jailing 2.1 16.44%]. The sac-averaged flow velocity treated by PLCS, PED and PED+LC compared to preoperatively was significantly lower than the jailing technique [PED+LC = PLCS 1.2 (dual LVIS) 17.5% < PLCS 1.1 (single LVIS) = PED 27.5% < Jailing 1.2 = Jailing 2.2 32.5% < Jailing 1.1 37.5% < Jailing 2.1 40%]. The sac-averaged WSS for the PLCS 1.2 (dual LVIS) model was lower than the PED+LC, while the high WSS area of the Jailing 1 model was larger than for Jailing 2 [PLCS 1.2 38.94% (dual LVIS) < PED+LC 41% < PLCS 1.1 43.36% (single LVIS) < PED 45.23% < Jailing 2.1 47.49% < Jailing 2.2 47.79% < Jailing 1.1 48.97% < Jailing 1.2 49.85%]. Conclusions: For fusiform aneurysms, post large coil stenting can provide a uniform coil configuration potentially reducing the hemodynamic risk factors of recurrence. Flow diverters also may reduce the recurrence risk, with long-term follow-up required, especially to monitor branch blood flow to prevent postoperative ischemia. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The coexistence of intracranial aneurysm (IA) is generally thought to be highest in patients with pituitary adenomas (PAs). Different mechanisms may play a role in aneurysm formation, but whether the PA contributes to aneurysm formation is still unclear. In the literature, there are numerous reported cases of this association; however, the analyses of the characteristics of PAs, aneurysms, and treatment management are rare and limited to a restricted number of case reports. We report a rare case of an embedded aneurysm in a macroprolactinoma treated with therapeutic management tailored to the clinical, neurological, and radiological characteristics of the patient. To select the best treatment, we reviewed the literature and reported the only cases in which the radiological characteristics of aneurysms, PAs, therapeutic management, and patient outcome are described. We aimed to understand what are the variables that determine the best therapeutic management with the best possible outcome. The presence of a large pseudoaneurysm of the internal carotid artery completely embedded in a giant macroprolactinoma is rare and needs a tailored treatment strategy. The importance of the preoperative knowledge of asymptomatic IA coexisting with PA can avoid accidental rupture of the aneurysm during surgical resection and may lead to planning the best treatment. A high degree of suspicion for an associated aneurysm is needed, and if magnetic resonance imaging shows some atypical features, digital subtraction angiography must be performed prior to contemplating any intervention to avoid iatrogenic aneurysmal rupture. Our multimodal approach with the first-line therapy of low-dose cabergoline to obtain prolactin normalization with minimum risks of aneurysms rupture and subsequent endovascular treatment with flow diverter has not been described elsewhere to our knowledge. In the cases, we suggest adopting a tailored low-dose cabergoline therapy scheme to avoid rupture during cytoreduction and initiate a close neuroradiological follow-up program. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Endovascular aneurysm coiling is a minimally invasive method to manage intracranial aneurysms. However, aneurysm coiling may fail in very small aneurysms (VSAs); thus, flow diverter (FD) is recommended as an alternative in these difficult aneurysms. Herein, we report our experience and outcomes of FD to treat VSA of the internal carotid artery (ICA). Methods: Over a 3-year period, a total of 70 patients with 87 unruptured VSAs of the ICA were managed by FD. There were 54 men and 16 women, with a mean age of 57 (range, 41--75) years. We retrospectively assessed the clinical data, aneurysm characteristics, and angiographic as well as clinical outcomes of patients treated by FD and compared with larger aneurysms. Results: Fifty aneurysms (58%) were located in the supraclinoid ICA, followed by paraclinoid ICA (n = 31, 36%) and cavernous ICA (n = 6, 7%). Most aneurysms (n = 72, 83%) were between 2 and 3 mm in size. The mean aneurysm size was 2.3 mm (range, 1.5--3 mm). Follow-up angiographic data (mean, 13 months) were available in 54 patients with 68 aneurysms. Successful FD deployment in an ideal position to bride aneurysm was achieved in 86 of 87 aneurysms (99%). Complete obliteration (CO) was achieved in 63 aneurysms (93%). Compared with larger aneurysms (>3 mm), VSAs had the tendency to achieve CO (p < 0.05) in a midterm follow-up. Two patients (2.8%) had intraprocedural complications, including in-stent thrombosis (n = 1) and distal embolism (n = 1). One patient (1.4%) suffered from mild limb weakness. Conclusion: The use of FD to manage VSA was technically feasible, and the procedure was simpler than those of larger aneurysms. FD stenting of VSAs was confirmed to be effective and safe and had higher CO rate than those in larger aneurysms in a midterm angiographic follow-up. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Intracranial vertebral artery dissecting aneurysm (VADA) may present as aneurysmal dilation alone, dilation with coexisting stenosis, or, in some cases, as a recurrent aneurysm after previous reconstructive treatment. To date, the clinical utility of flow diverters in VADA has not been examined according to these various circumstances. This study aims to report the safety and efficacy of flow diverters in the treatment of various manifestations of intracranial VADA. Methods: A total of 26 patients and 27 VADAs treated with flow diverting stents from November 2014 to September 2021 were included. Medical records and radiologic data were analyzed to assess the safety and efficacy of flow diverting stents. Results: The results showed that 12 cases (44.4%) presented with aneurysmal dilation only, 7 (26.0%) with aneurysmal dilation and one or more associated stenotic lesions, and 8 (29.6%) as recurrence after previous treatment, including stent-assisted coil embolization (n = 5), single stent only (n = 1), and coil embolization without stent (n = 2). Among 27 lesions, 25 were treated with single flow diverters; additional flow diverting stents were required in 2 cases because of incomplete coverage of the aneurysm neck. There was one instance of incomplete expansion of the flow diverter. All cases showed contrast stagnation in the aneurysmal sac immediately after deployment of the flow diverting stent, and during a mean follow-up period of 18.6 months (range 6 to 60), the overall complete occlusion rate was 55.6%, with complete occlusion of 83.3% of aneurysmal dilation only lesions, 42.9% of aneurysms with stenosis, and 25% of the recurrent aneurysm. Only two patients (7.7%) had delayed ischemic complications. Conclusion: Flow diverters have proven safe and effective in unruptured VADA. However, the complete occlusion rate with the flow diverter is relatively lower in VADA with stenosis or with previous stent placement than in dilation-only lesions. Further study with a larger cohort would be needed to confirm these results. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To compare the safety, angiographic, and long-term clinical outcomes of intradural large vertebrobasilar artery (VBA) aneurysms following flow diversion (FD) or conventional stent-assisted coiling (SAC). Methods: We performed a retrospective study of 66 consecutive patients with intradural large VBA aneurysms between 2014 and 2021 who underwent FD or SAC. Patients' characteristics, postprocedural complications, and clinical and angiographic outcome details were reviewed. Results: A total of 66 intradural large VBA aneurysms were included, including 42 (63.6%), which were treated with SAC (SAC group) and 24 (36.4%), which were treated with FD (FD group). Clinical follow-up was obtained at the median of 24.0 [interquartile range (IQR) 12.0–45.0] months, with 34 (81.0%) patients achieved the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) ≤ 2 in the SAC group and 21 (87.5%) patients in the FD group. Thirteen (19.7%) patients experienced neurological complications, of which 9 (13.6%) patients first occurred during the periprocedural phase and 4 (6.1%) patients first occurred during follow-up. The overall complication rate and periprocedural complication rate were both higher in the SAC group, but did not reach statistical significance (23.8 vs. 12.5%, P = 0.430; 16.7 vs. 8.3%, P = 0.564). The mortality rates were similar between the groups (11.9 vs. 12.5%). Angiographic follow-up was available for 46 patients at the median of 7 (IQR 6–14) months, with a numerically higher complete occlusion rate in the SAC group (82.1 vs. 55.6%, P = 0.051) and similar adequate aneurysm occlusion rates between the groups (85.7 vs. 83.3%, P = 1.000). In the multivariate analysis, ischemic onset (P = 0.019), unilateral vertebral artery sacrifice (P = 0.008), and older age (≥60 years) (P = 0.031) were significantly associated with complications. Conclusion: There was a trend toward lower complication rate and lower complete occlusion rate for intradural large VBA aneurysms following FD as compared to SAC. FD and SAC have comparable mortality rates and favorable outcomes. Ischemic onset, unilateral vertebral artery sacrifice, and older age could increase the risk of complications. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: This systematic review aims to summarize the evidence investigating the effectiveness and safety of the Surpass Evolve-Flow Diverter (SE-FD) to treat brain aneurysms. Method: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library from January 2019 to 29 March 2022. Terms related to the "intracranial aneurysm" and "surpass evolve flow diverter" concepts were used to search the databases; Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) and reference hand search were also utilized. Results: The searches primarily identified 1586 documents. A total of five studies (four case series and one cohort) were included in this review. In the included studies, 192 (74 male and 118 females) patients with 198 aneurysms were involved. In total, 153 SE-FDs were used to treat 145 aneurysms. Complete occlusion was achieved in 69/145 (48%) cases and near-complete occlusion in 24/145 (17%) cases from aneurysms treated with SE-FD. Reported postoperative complications included stent thrombosis (n = 4 patients), hemorrhage (n = 5 patients), ischemia (n = 9 patients), and neurological complications (n = 12 patients). In total, four deaths were reported with only one related to the SE-FD procedure. Conclusion: The results of this review are based on observational data, due to the absence of clinical trials. The findings of the included studies suggest that the effectiveness of the SE-FD procedure is lower than previous FDs but the safety is similar. The included studies also suggested that SE-FD has navigability and resistance to twisting, which makes the procedure an easier method to treat aneurysms that are proximal and distal to the circle of Willis deployment. This review highlights the urgency to conduct clinical trials to confirm these suggestions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Few studies have evaluated flow diversion with magnetic resonance angiography (MRA). Studies have shown better success of MRA in assessing the aneurysm response, but limited success in assessing stent patency. The patency of arterial branches on MRA remains to be explored. Retrospective evaluation of 31 consecutive cases of carotid aneurysms treated with flow diversion was performed with noncontrast time-of-flight (TOF), contrast-enhanced TOF, and cine MRA (time-resolved angiography with interleaved stochastic trajectories) independently by 2 investigators for aneurysm occlusion, stent patency, and arterial branch patency. Digital subtraction angiography served as the gold standard technique. Patients were 6 men and 25 women with a mean ± SD age of 57.8 ± 12.27 years (range, 32–79 years). Stent patency, aneurysm occlusion, and branch patency mostly revealed substantial to perfect interobserver agreement (κ >0.60). Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for stent patency on raw data images of TOF were 0.50, 0.86, 0.20, and 0.96 and on contrast-enhanced TOF were 1.0, 0.93, 0.50, and 1.0. Ranges for aneurysm response on the 3 MRA scans were 0.78–0.89 for sensitivity, 0.54–0.92 for specificity, 0.73–0.93 for positive predictive value, and 0.78–0.86 for negative predictive value. Ranges for arterial branch patency among the 3 MRA scans were 0.87–0.96 for sensitivity, 0.50–1.0 for specificity, 0.90–1.0 for positive predictive value, and 0.33–0.80 for negative predictive value. Aneurysm occlusion, stent patency, and arterial branch patency in flow diversion can be successfully evaluated with the combination of 3 MRA techniques. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Endovascular treatment of cervical internal carotid artery (ICA) loop dissections in acute stroke interventions can be challenging. Flow diverters can effectively reconstruct vessel loops and treat the injured vessel and provide a safe conduit for intracranial catheterization. We retrospectively reviewed our neurointerventional database and identified all patients with ICA loop dissections treated with flow diverters in the acute setting between August 2016 and September 2020. Patient demographics, procedural data, imaging follow-up results, and clinical outcome information were collected. Seven patients with a mean age of 62 years (range: 43–85 years) who underwent reconstruction of an ICA (loop) dissection with flow diverters were included. Four ICA dissections were treated with the Surpass Streamline flow diverter and 3 with the Pipeline embolization device. All cases were technically successful. All stroke cases achieved intracranial flow ≥thrombolysis in cerebral infarction 2B. Observed intracranial hemorrhages were all asymptomatic. All cases showed patent flow diverter(s) with or without (carotid) stent(s) on follow-up imaging. Semielectively treated patients did not show a change from baseline modified Rankin scale related to the procedure. Patients with acute stroke had a modified Rankin scale ≤2 in 4 of 5 cases (80%) at 3 months. Two patients died due to medical issues unrelated to the procedures. No patient showed new or recurrent symptoms. Use of flow diverters, in some cases in conjunction with (carotid) stents, is an effective treatment option for cervical carotid artery (loop) dissections. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: This study aims to compare the efficacy, safety, and long-term outcomes of two flow diverters, i.e., pipeline embolization device and flow re-direction endoluminal device, in the treatment of distal carotid aneurysms. Methods: A total of 138 patients with 175 aneurysms were included from February 2012 to September 2019. Ninety-nine aneurysms were treated with flow re-direction endoluminal device and 76 with pipeline embolization device. Angiographic follow-ups were at the 6th, 12th, 24th, 36th, and 60th months; the O'Kelly-Marotta grading scale was used to assess aneurysms occlusion. Outcomes of two devices were compared; possible associations regarding patient characteristics, aneurysm properties, treatment details, and adverse events were evaluated. Results: The mean follow-up period was 33 months, with 10 patients lost to follow-up. Occlusion rates at the 6th and 12th months and during the last follow-up were similar for flow re-direction endoluminal device (81%, 84%, and 90%) and pipeline embolization device (82%, 85%, and 93%). Occlusion rates were also similar after stand-alone use without coiling. There was no significant difference regarding adverse event rates with a 10.9% overall complication rate, 3.6% mortality, and 0.7% permanent morbidity. All the mortality and morbidity were related to hemorrhagic complications. Device deployment failure was observed with five flow re-direction endoluminal devices and two pipeline embolization devices, whereas two severe in-stent stenoses occurred with each device. Conclusions: Both flow re-direction endoluminal device and pipeline embolization device are feasible and effective in flow diversion of distal internal carotid artery aneurysms, with similar adverse events rates and aneurysm occlusion success. Aneurysm occlusion rates increase with time, while the presence of an integrated branch significantly decreases treatment success. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The p64MW HPC and p48MW HPC flow diverters have reduced thrombogenicity due to hydrophilic coating. The purpose of this study was to evaluate its safety and efficacy in Mongolian patients under single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT) with prasugrel. Materials and methods: We performed a retrospective review of patients enrolled into our prospectively maintained database to identify all patients treated with either the p48MW HPC or p64MW HPC under SAPT. We recorded baseline demographics, aneurysm size and location, procedural complications, angiographic and clinical results. Results: 24 patients, (female = 21, 87.5%), age 48.2 ± 11.6 years (range 25–63) underwent treatment of 30 aneurysms with either p64MW HPC or p48MW HPC. All aneurysms were saccular with dome width 8.2 ± 6.5 (range 1.6–26.0 mm) and dome height 7.6 ± 6.7 (range 1.6–30.0 mm). None of the aneurysms were previously treated. The average PRU was 54.6 ± 31.2 (range 1–127) on pre-operative VerifyNow testing. Angiographic follow-up was available for 13 patients (17 aneurysms), 183 ± 36 days post-procedure, at which point 64.7% of aneurysms (n = 11/17) were completely occluded and 11.8% (n = 2/17) had only neck remnants resulting in 76.5% of aneurysms being adequately occluded A single intra-operative complication (4.2%) occurred however all patients were mRS ≤1 at last follow-up. There were two post-operative complications neither of which resulted in permanent neurological morbidity. There were no instances of post-operative aneurysmal rupture or delayed parenchymal haemorrhage. The overall mortality was 0%. Conclusion: The efficacy and safety of p64MW HPC coated devices under SAPT is similar to uncoated flow diverters that require DAPT. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: The Flow Re-direction Endoluminal Device (FRED) has recently become available for flow diversion in Japan. We have encountered cases that failed to deploy the FRED. In this study, we report our initial experience with the FRED for cerebral aneurysms and clarify the causes of failed FRED deployment. Methods: A retrospective data analysis was performed to identify patients treated with the FRED between June 2020 and March 2021. Follow-up digital subtraction angiography was performed at 3 and 6 months and assessed using the O'Kelly-Marotta (OKM) grading scale. Results: Thirty-nine aneurysms in 36 patients (average age: 54.4 years) were treated with the FRED. The average sizes of the dome and neck were 9.9 mm and 5.2 mm, respectively. In nine patients, additional coiling was performed. In one patient (2.6%), proximal vessel injury caused direct carotid-cavernous fistula during deployment. Ischaemic complications were encountered in one patient (2.6%) with transient symptoms. Angiographic follow-up at 6 months revealed OKM grade C or D in 86.6% of patients. FRED deployment was successful in 35 (92.1%) procedures. In the failure group, the differences between the FRED and the minimum vessel diameter (P = 0.04) and the rate of the parent vessel having an S-shaped curve (P = 0.04) were greater than those in the success group. Conclusions: Flow diversion using the FRED is effective and safe for treating cerebral aneurysms. The use of the FRED for patients with an S-shaped curve in the parent vessel and oversizing of more than 2 mm should be considered carefully. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In the treatment of an intracranial aneurysm with the flow diverter, the combined use of coil embolization can help promote subsequent progressive thrombosis within the aneurysm sac and reduce the risk of delayed aneurysm rupture. This study retrospectively reviewed outcomes of patients who had undergone the Pipeline Embolization Device (PED) with adjunctive coil embolization (PED/coil) at a single center to determine its safety and efficiency. Patients with internal carotid artery aneurysms following an intradural component were selected for PED/coil between 2015 and 2020. All patients were premedicated with dual antiplatelet therapy of aspirin plus clopidogrel or prasugrel. A minimal number of PEDs were deployed, with coils inserted using a stent-jail technique, avoiding dense packing. A total of 46 aneurysms (43 patients; median dome size, 11.6 mm; median neck width, 6.3 mm) were treated with PED/coil. The median volume embolization ratio was 14.8%. The degree of angiographic filling at the 6-month and latest angiography showed complete occlusion in 60.5% (26/43) and 70.5% (31/44), respectively. Small (< 10 mm) aneurysms achieved a higher complete occlusion rate in the early period; a lower cumulative incidence of aneurysm occlusion was observed in large and giant (≥ 10 mm) aneurysms (P =.024). The median clinical follow-up was 22 months, and no aneurysm ruptures occurred. Favorable clinical outcomes were achieved, with permanent neurological morbidity of 4.7% and no mortality. PED/coil demonstrated a high angiographic occlusion rate at an early stage. Loosely packed coils are sufficient to obliterate aneurysms effectively. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• Low complications are confirmed in patients with complex intracranial aneurysms via strategy of telescoping flow diverters. • Clinical and angiographic outcome is satisfactory for patients treated via strategy of telescoping flow diverters. • The 8-year long-term experience provides evidence for further prospective study focusing on telescoping flow diverters technique. Treatment of complex intracranial aneurysms (IAs) is still a challenging thing and this study aims to summarize the experience of telescoping flow diverters (FDs) in treating complex intracranial aneurysms. Between April 2013 to November 2020, 381 IA cases treated by flow diverters (FD) were retrieved from the database of 4988 IA cases, and finally 20 cases treated by telescoping FDs were enrolled for further analysis. Among 20 patients, 15 patients (75.0%) received Tubridge telescoping while 5 patients (25.0%) received PED telescoping. The technical success rate was 100%. The immediate occlusion results were: 7 cases of OKM grade A (35.0%), 11 cases of OKM grade B (55.0%), and 2 cases of OKM grade C (10.0%). No perioperative complications occurred. The clinical follow-up was available in 20 patients (100%) and the follow-up time was 6–96 months. One patient developed massive infarction and the other 19 patients were range between 0 and 2. The angiographic follow-up was available in 17 patients (85%) and the follow-up time was 6–27 months. The occlusion results were: 1 case of OKM grade B (5.9%), 6 cases of OKM grade C (35, 0.3%), and 10 cases of OKM grade D (58.8%). 2 patients (11.8%) developed occlusion of the patent artery. Telescoping flow diverters showed low perioperative complications and high IA occlusion rate when treating complex intracranial aneurysms in follow-up time, which provides an alternative manner beyond conventional strategy for neurosurgeons. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Flow diverter stents are gaining wider use in the treatment of complex intracranial aneurysms; however, there are limited data on occlusion and complication rates of flow diverters in very large and giant aneurysms. This study assessed the safety and efficacy of flow redirection endoluminal device (FRED) and FRED Jr. stents in aneurysms ≥ 20 mm. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed all aneurysms ≥ 20 mm treated with FRED/FRED Jr. between January 2010 and June 2020 from three centers. Endpoints for clinical safety were absence of major stroke, aneurysmal rupture, or death and complete or near-complete occlusion for efficacy. Results: A total of 45 patients with very large (28 cases) and giant aneurysms (17 cases) were treated with FRED (41 cases), and FRED Jr. (4 cases) stents. The majority of the aneurysms (40/45, 88.9%) were in the anterior circulation. Adjunctive aneurysm coiling was performed in 21 aneurysms (46.7%). Technical complications were encountered in 4 procedures (8.9%). Ischemic and hemorrhagic complication rates were 6.7% and 8.9%, respectively. There was no case with major stroke. The mortality rate was 8.9%, and all cases were due to hemorrhagic complications from aneurysmal rupture. Median angiographic follow-up was 21.5 months (range 3–60 months). Complete occlusion was achieved in 32 aneurysms (71.1%), and near-complete occlusion in 5 cases (11.1%). Conclusion: The use of FRED/FRED Jr. for the treatment of aneurysms ≥ 20 mm achieved a long-term aneurysm occlusion rate and a safety profile comparable to the large series reported with other flow diverter stents. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The efficacy of flow diverters is dependent upon robust wall apposition in the parent artery. Usage in large caliber cerebral vessels has therefore been limited as few implants with diameters > 5 mm exist. We present our initial experience in treating cerebral aneurysms using the 5.5 mm and 6 mm diameter implants of the Derivo embolization device (DED). Methods: Our prospectively maintained institutional database was reviewed to identify patients in whom a > 5 mm DED was implanted between November 2016 and February 2021. The primary efficacy outcome was complete or near-complete aneurysm occlusion at 6 months (O'Kelly-Marotta, OKM, C–D, adapted for magnetic resonance angiography). Safety outcomes included 30-day major morbidity defined as modified Rankin Score (mRS) 3–5, mortality, serious adverse events and procedural complications. Results: A total of 21 large diameter DEDs were deployed in 18 patients (age 59.5 ± 14.1 years), harboring 19 unruptured aneurysms. Of the aneurysms 14 (73.7%) were saccular in morphology (sac diameter 10.9 ± 5.5 mm, neck diameter 6.8 ± 3.1 mm), 3 (15.8%) aneurysms were dissecting, 1 (5.3%) iatrogenic pseudoaneurysm and 1 (5.3%) fusiform. Aneurysm locations were: ICA (internal carotid artery) (n = 17); (7 cavernous, 4 paraophthalmic, 2 paraclinoid, 1 petrous, 2 communicating, 1 cervical); vertebrobasilar (n = 2). Adjunct stenting to optimize proximal wall apposition was undertaken in 5 (27.8%) patients. At 6 months 75% of patients followed-up met the primary efficacy endpoint (OKM C–D). There were no serious adverse events, 30-day major morbidity (mRS 3–5) or mortality. Conclusion: Implantation of large diameter (5.5 mm and 6 mm) DEDs into capacious cerebral vessels to treat a range of complex aneurysms is safe and technically feasible but may require adjunct stenting to optimize proximal wall apposition. Short-term efficacy of this device subset is comparable to previous DED and other flow diverter studies. Long-term follow-up and comparative studies are required for further assessment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background Serial cerebral angiographic imaging is necessary to ensure cerebral aneurysm occlusion after flow diverter placement. Time-of-flight (TOF)-magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) is used for this purpose due to its lack of radiation, contrast media and complications. The comparative diagnostic yield of TOF-MRA for different flow diverters has not been previously analyzed. Purpose To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of TOF-MRA in cerebral aneurysms treated w divertersith different flow diverters. Materials and Methods Flow-diverted patients whose cerebral follow-up MRA and digital subtraction angiograms (DSA) were obtained within 6 weeks were retrospectively identified. The DSA (as gold standard) and MRA images of these patients were compared by two readers (blinded to both patient data and endovascular procedure data) for residual aneurysms and the status of the parent artery for each type of flow diverter. In a second group of patients, magnetic susceptibility artifacts were manually measured and compared for different FDs. Results Seventy-six patients (85 aneurysms) were included in group one, and 86 patients (95 aneurysms) were included in group 2. TOF-MRA and DSA showed almost perfect agreement for residual aneurysms (κ = 0.88, p

IntroductionRecent reports suggest that thromboembolic complications are associated with Pipeline embolization device (PED) placement cluster in P2Y12 hyporesponders.ObjectiveTo evaluate the role of P2Y12 hyporesponse in PED placement by retrospectively reviewing a single-center series of patients.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed an institutional review board-approved database of patients with an aneurysm at a single institution and identified all patients with a measured P2Y12 reaction unit (PRU)>200 who had undergone anterior circulation PED placement. Events such as transient ischemic attack, stroke, and hemorrhage were identified as well as demographic and procedural details.ResultsFifty-two patients with a PRU >200 had undergone anterior circulation PED placement. Four patients had prior subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) (8%) and 11 aneurysms (21%) had been previously treated. The average aneurysm size was 7.6 mm (±6.2). PED thrombosis occurred intraprocedurally in three patients, none of whom developed neurological deficits after abciximab administration. Treatment of all patients was successful and 48 procedures (92%) had no complications. One patient had a major stroke (2%) with permanent hemiparesis. There were three minor complications (6%): one minor stroke with a visual field cut, one 10 cc intracranial hemorrhage with transient left lower extremity weakness, and one transient neurological deficit not verified by imaging. No deaths or cases of SAH occurred.ConclusionsP2Y12 hyporesponse (PRU>200) is not associated with increased periprocedural complications in a contemporary series of patients undergoing anterior circulation PED placement. Titration of antiplatelet medications to P2Y12 >200 remains unindicated and may increase the risk of hemorrhagic complications.

ObjectiveThis study comparatively analyzed the hemodynamic changes resulting from various simulated stent-assisted embolization treatments to explore an optimal treatment strategy for intracranial vertebral artery fusiform aneurysms. An actual vertebral fusiform aneurysm case treated by large coil post-stenting (PLCS) was used as a control.Materials and MethodsA single case of an intracranial vertebral artery fusiform aneurysm underwent a preoperative and eight postoperative finite element treatment simulations: PLCS [single and dual Low-profile Visualized Intraluminal Support (LVIS)], Jailing technique (single and dual LVIS both simulated twice, Pipeline Embolization Device (PED) with or without large coils (LCs). Qualitative and quantitative assessments were performed to analyze the most common hemodynamic risk factors for recurrence.ResultsJailing technique and PED-only had a high residual flow volume (RFV) and wall shear stress (WSS) on the large curvature of the blood flow impingement region. Quantitative analysis determined that PLSC and PED had a lower RFV compared to preoperative than did the jailing technique [PED+LC 2.46% < PLCS 1.2 (dual LVIS) 4.75% < PLCS 1.1 (single LVIS) 6.34% < PED 6.58% < Jailing 2.2 12.45% < Jailing 1.2 12.71% < Jailing 1.1 14.28% < Jailing 2.1 16.44%]. The sac-averaged flow velocity treated by PLCS, PED and PED+LC compared to preoperatively was significantly lower than the jailing technique [PED+LC = PLCS 1.2 (dual LVIS) 17.5% < PLCS 1.1 (single LVIS) = PED 27.5% < Jailing 1.2 = Jailing 2.2 32.5% < Jailing 1.1 37.5% < Jailing 2.1 40%]. The sac-averaged WSS for the PLCS 1.2 (dual LVIS) model was lower than the PED+LC, while the high WSS area of the Jailing 1 model was larger than for Jailing 2 [PLCS 1.2 38.94% (dual LVIS) < PED+LC 41% < PLCS 1.1 43.36% (single LVIS) < PED 45.23% < Jailing 2.1 47.49% < Jailing 2.2 47.79% < Jailing 1.1 48.97% < Jailing 1.2 49.85%].ConclusionsFor fusiform aneurysms, post large coil stenting can provide a uniform coil configuration potentially reducing the hemodynamic risk factors of recurrence. Flow diverters also may reduce the recurrence risk, with long-term follow-up required, especially to monitor branch blood flow to prevent postoperative ischemia.

ObjectiveIntracranial vertebral artery dissecting aneurysm (VADA) may present as aneurysmal dilation alone, dilation with coexisting stenosis, or, in some cases, as a recurrent aneurysm after previous reconstructive treatment. To date, the clinical utility of flow diverters in VADA has not been examined according to these various circumstances. This study aims to report the safety and efficacy of flow diverters in the treatment of various manifestations of intracranial VADA.MethodsA total of 26 patients and 27 VADAs treated with flow diverting stents from November 2014 to September 2021 were included. Medical records and radiologic data were analyzed to assess the safety and efficacy of flow diverting stents.ResultsThe results showed that 12 cases (44.4%) presented with aneurysmal dilation only, 7 (26.0%) with aneurysmal dilation and one or more associated stenotic lesions, and 8 (29.6%) as recurrence after previous treatment, including stent-assisted coil embolization (n = 5), single stent only (n = 1), and coil embolization without stent (n = 2). Among 27 lesions, 25 were treated with single flow diverters; additional flow diverting stents were required in 2 cases because of incomplete coverage of the aneurysm neck. There was one instance of incomplete expansion of the flow diverter. All cases showed contrast stagnation in the aneurysmal sac immediately after deployment of the flow diverting stent, and during a mean follow-up period of 18.6 months (range 6 to 60), the overall complete occlusion rate was 55.6%, with complete occlusion of 83.3% of aneurysmal dilation only lesions, 42.9% of aneurysms with stenosis, and 25% of the recurrent aneurysm. Only two patients (7.7%) had delayed ischemic complications.ConclusionFlow diverters have proven safe and effective in unruptured VADA. However, the complete occlusion rate with the flow diverter is relatively lower in VADA with stenosis or with previous stent placement than in dilation-only lesions. Further study with a larger cohort would be needed to confirm these results.

ObjectiveTo compare the safety, angiographic, and long-term clinical outcomes of intradural large vertebrobasilar artery (VBA) aneurysms following flow diversion (FD) or conventional stent-assisted coiling (SAC).MethodsWe performed a retrospective study of 66 consecutive patients with intradural large VBA aneurysms between 2014 and 2021 who underwent FD or SAC. Patients' characteristics, postprocedural complications, and clinical and angiographic outcome details were reviewed.ResultsA total of 66 intradural large VBA aneurysms were included, including 42 (63.6%), which were treated with SAC (SAC group) and 24 (36.4%), which were treated with FD (FD group). Clinical follow-up was obtained at the median of 24.0 [interquartile range (IQR) 12.0–45.0] months, with 34 (81.0%) patients achieved the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) ≤ 2 in the SAC group and 21 (87.5%) patients in the FD group. Thirteen (19.7%) patients experienced neurological complications, of which 9 (13.6%) patients first occurred during the periprocedural phase and 4 (6.1%) patients first occurred during follow-up. The overall complication rate and periprocedural complication rate were both higher in the SAC group, but did not reach statistical significance (23.8 vs. 12.5%, P = 0.430; 16.7 vs. 8.3%, P = 0.564). The mortality rates were similar between the groups (11.9 vs. 12.5%). Angiographic follow-up was available for 46 patients at the median of 7 (IQR 6–14) months, with a numerically higher complete occlusion rate in the SAC group (82.1 vs. 55.6%, P = 0.051) and similar adequate aneurysm occlusion rates between the groups (85.7 vs. 83.3%, P = 1.000). In the multivariate analysis, ischemic onset (P = 0.019), unilateral vertebral artery sacrifice (P = 0.008), and older age (≥60 years) (P = 0.031) were significantly associated with complications.ConclusionThere was a trend toward lower complication rate and lower complete occlusion rate for intradural large VBA aneurysms following FD as compared to SAC. FD and SAC have comparable mortality rates and favorable outcomes. Ischemic onset, unilateral vertebral artery sacrifice, and older age could increase the risk of complications.

Cerebral blister aneurysms are very difficult vascular lesions in terms of accurate diagnosis as well as proper management strategy for vascular neurosurgeons and neurointerventionists. Histopathological analysis has revealed their nature to be more akin to pseudoaneurysms in comparison to the typical berry aneurysms. This explains their fragile nature, with high probability of rerupture and regrowth during the follow-up if not addressed properly. Even though surgical approaches have evolved over the years to minimize intraprocedural rupture and recurrence, they still have relatively high morbidity as well as mortality in comparison to endovascular treatment. Over the last few years, endovascular treatment has evolved significantly, with introduction of new devices and techniques. Focus of the endovascular management has shifted from the deconstructive techniques to reconstructive ones with parent artery preservation. Recent introduction of flow diverter technology has enabled neurointerventionists to manage these difficult lesions with more confidence in terms of avoiding rerupture and recurrence. Flow diverter (FD) use in blister aneurysm resulted in high-technical success, complete aneurysm occlusion, and less complications in comparison to other reconstructive techniques like simple coiling, stent assisted coiling, and overlapping/monotherapy stent placement. Few debatable issues like use of dual antiplatelets in the setting of acute subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH), timing of drugs in relation to procedures, single/overlapping devices, and concerns during cerebral vasospasm phase need further detailed analysis and standardized protocols. In this article, we have done a review of different endovascular treatment options in the management of internal carotid artery blister aneurysms with special focus on FD and issues related to it.

Background Placement of flow diverter (FD) is an endovascular technique where the flow to the aneurysm is directed away from the aneurysmal sac using a stent in the parent vessel. In this clinical report, the authors share their institutional experience pertaining to clinical course of patients with intracranial aneurysm requiring placement of FD. Methods After approval from institute ethics committee (IEC), the authors retrospectively studied all patients who underwent placement of FD for intracranial aneurysms from January 2014 to December 2017. Data regarding patient demographics, presenting complaints, aneurysm details, anesthesia technique, and intra- and postprocedural complications were noted. Duration of hospital stay, neurological outcome as measured by Glasgow outcome scale (GOS) at discharge and at 6 months was noted. Data are presented as median (range) or number (%). Results Over a period of 3 years, 22 patients underwent FD placement. Two patients had subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) at the time of presentation, and the rest had unruptured aneurysms. All patients received general anesthesia (GA) for the procedure, and intravenous propofol was used for induction of anesthesia. Majority of the patients received sevoflurane and nitrous oxide combination for maintenance of anesthesia (20/22 [91%]). Five patients were not extubated at the end of the procedure. The most common indication for mechanical ventilation was delayed reversal because of hypothermia. At 6 months of follow-up, GOS was 5 in 18 patients. None of the patients developed any delayed complications related to FD and were neurologically intact. Conclusions The use of FD for the treatment of aneurysms is a safe option. GA was used for carrying out procedure in all patients. The neurological outcome was good in all patients who were followed at 6 months.

The Woven EndoBridge (WEB) device is increasingly used for treatment of wide-neck bifurcation aneurysms. With the newer 17 system, WEB deployment has been associated with a phenomenon known as incomplete or “sticky” detachment from the delivery wire, which may lead to imprecise placement. Optimal techniques for WEB manipulation and delivery to avoid this problem are poorly defined. This study aimed to evaluate standard WEB deployment techniques and determine the impact of delivery techniques and WEB stickiness on procedural success.An in vitro study using identical silicone middle cerebral artery aneurysm models (n = 32) assessed WEB (6 × 2 mm) deployment through a VIA 17 microcatheter via three techniques that involved: “loading,” “neutral,” and “tension” on the pusher wire. Microcatheter position was placed in varied positions from the WEB device. Woven EndoBridge stickiness was graded during detachment attempts. Primary outcomes were detachment stickiness and attempt number, compared between techniques using Fisher's exact test.The tension technique resulted in significantly fewer sticky detachments and detachment attempts compared to forward load or neutral techniques (p < 0.001). Sticky detachment was lower with tension (0% sticky) versus forward load (42% sticky, 8% very sticky) (p < 0.001). Forward load had a 50% rate of stickiness versus 0% with tension and neutral (p < 0.001). Forward load required multiple attempts in 100%, compared to 57% with neutral and 8% with tension (p < 0.001). Higher stickiness grades increased the need for multiple attempts (p < 0.001).The tension technique reduces incomplete WEB detachment and enables precise single-attempt detachment, optimizing delivery precision. In vivo confirmation is needed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Thirty-three-year-old female underwent diagnostic work-up for chronic headaches.Cerebral DSA on the right side showed fetal posterior cerebral artery (PCA) with unusually shaped arterial malformation on its proximal part. Malformation was formed by multiple convolutions and loops with no arteriovenous shunting. During endovascular procedure, flow diverter stent was placed in the right C6 segment. Patient was put on double antiaggregation therapy. Four weeks after procedure, patient was admitted to ER with signs of dyphasia. No recent ischemic lesions were detected on emergent magnetic resonance. Dyphasia resolved spontaneously. On follow-up magnetic resonance angiography 5 years after the procedure, main portion of malformation has diminished with slightly filling of posterior part supplied by right P1.Here, reported finding is consistent with previously described pure arterial malformation (PAM). Main intention of our treatment was to induce malformation remodeling with flow diverter placement. Two main risks arise when using flow diverters on fetal PCA region. Firstly, there is possibility of occluding fetal PCA alongside malformation. On the contrary, high flow through fetal PCA could hinder malformation thrombosis. Some case series reported high rate of fetal PCA occlusion without ischemic sequelae in the PCA teritory. Others consider flow diverters highly ineffective treatment for the fetal PCA aneurysms due to low rate of complete aneurysm occlusion.We presented first reported case in which flow diverter was used to treat PAM. Slow malformation thrombosis leaves enough time for collateral circulation to recruit and supply territory of the vessel affected by the malformation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Spinal aneurysms rarely occur in the collateral circulation of the vertebral artery (VA). These aneurysms are difficult to treat. A flow diverter (FD) can be a therapeutic option. A 62-year-old man suffered subarachnoid hemorrhage. His Hunt–Hess scale classification was grade II. Digital subtraction angiography (DSA) revealed that the bilateral distal VAs were occluded, there were two flow-related aneurysms in the collateral circulation of the first radicular artery of the VA, and there was a dissecting aneurysm at the origin of the posterior inferior cerebellar artery (PICA). The FD covered the PICA dissecting aneurysm, and the first radicular artery originated in the VA. Postoperatively, computed tomography angiography revealed a patent PICA and regression of the aneurysm in the collateral circulation. At the one-month follow-up, he showed good recovery and was therefore allowed to return to work. Follow-up DSA confirmed the regression of the aneurysms. However, the intracranial VA and PICA were unexpectedly occluded. It is difficult to catheterize aneurysms in the collateral circulation to perform coiling. It is also dangerous to embolize such aneurysms with a liquid embolic agent. After FD deployment to cover the origin of the parent artery, the hemodynamic stress of the aneurysm decreases, and the aneurysm can regress. Aneurysms in the collateral circulation were not accessible. FD deployment in the parent artery to cover the origin of the feeding artery of the collateral circulation is feasible for treating such aneurysms. • Aneurysms rarely occur in the collateral circulation of the vertebral artery. • These aneurysms are difficult to treat. • A flow diverter can be a therapeutic option because it covers the origin of the feeding artery in the vertebral artery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]