Search

6575 Background: Human papilloma virus (HPV) associated oropharyngeal cancer is associated with a favorable prognosis, but standard multimodality treatment is associated with substantial treatment related toxicity. A de-escalation treatment paradigm that optimizes oncologic outcomes while reducing toxicity is needed. We sought to further expound on our published OPTIMA data with long-term follow-up and additional pts subsequently treated using the OPTIMA treatment paradigm. Methods: Long-term follow-up of our institutional de-escalation OPTIMA trial (NCT02258659) and retrospective review of additional patients treated subsequently per OPTIMA outline was performed. Pts were classified as low-risk (LR) (≤T3, ≤N2B, ≤10PYH) or high-risk (HR) (T4, ≥N2c, > 10PYH). Pts received induction chemotherapy (IC) of 3 cycles of dose dense carboplatin and nab-paclitaxel (OPTIMA) or paclitaxel (subsequently treated). LR with ≥50% response received low-dose radiotherapy (RT) to 50 Gy. LR with 30-50% response or HR with ≥50% response received intermediate-dose chemoradiotherapy (CRT) to 45Gy. All others received full-dose CRT to 75Gy. Results: 108 pts consented and 107 were treated (61 on study; 46 subsequently) from October 2014 through November 2019. 1 pt transferred care post-enrollment. Median follow-up was 36 months (interquartile range 17-45). Median age was 63 years (range 33-84) and 95% were male. 47% were LR and 53% were HR. ≥50% tumor shrinkage occurred in 78/107 (73%) of pts overall, and 37/51 (73%) among LR; 41/56 (73%) among HR. 82% of pts received de-escalated (C)RT. Overall, 94% of pts were alive at last follow-up (98% LR; 89% HR). 3 pts (2 HR and 1 LR) developed disease recurrence (2.7%), with 2 local recurrences and 1 distant recurrence. Likelihood of G-tube placement was 3% in low-dose RT, 35% in intermediate-dose CRT, and 84% in full-dose CRT. Conclusions: IC followed by risk-adapted dose and volume de-escalated treatment for HPV+ oropharyngeal cancer demonstrates excellent oncologic and functional outcomes with long-term follow-up. Supported by Celgene, Alinea benefit supported by Grant Achatz/Nick Kokonas, and National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) through Grant Number P30 CA14599. Clinical trial information: NCT02258659 .

9616 Background: Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) provides high rates of treated metastasis control, stimulates innate and adaptive immune pathways, and is safe in patients treated with anti-PD1 monotherapy following SBRT. We hypothesize that SBRT may improve outcomes for patients receiving immunotherapy through both direct cytoreduction and increased immunogenicity. Within this context, we conducted a phase 1 trial designed to evaluate the safety of combination immune checkpoint blockade with nivolumab and ipilimumab(N/Ip) plus sequential (Seq) or concurrent (Con) multisite SBRT (mSBRT) in patients with stage IV NSCLC. Methods: Treatment naïve patients (EGFR/ALK WT) with advanced NSCLC received SBRT to 1 to 4 metastases. Not all metastases were targeted, and metastases > 65 mL were partially irradiated. Brain metastases were allowed on protocol, and those > 3mm were treated prior to enrollment. SBRT dose varied by anatomic site and ranged from 45 to 50 Gy in 3 to 5 fractions with predefined dose de-escalation if excess dose-limiting toxicities were observed. Patients on Seq arm received N/Ip between 1-7 days after completion of SBRT. Patients in Con arm received N/Ip prior to completion of SBRT. N/Ip continued until progression, development of toxicity, or up to 2 years. Patients underwent pre- and post-treatment biopsy of one irradiated lesion. Results: A total of 35 patients (Seq/Con 19/16) were enrolled and evaluable for toxicity analysis (SBRT and at least 1 cycle N/Ip). Brain metastases were present in 27%. PD-L1 expression: 0% (16), 1-49% (10), >50% (9). Median number of metastases treated with SBRT was 3.2. 6 patients experienced DLT (4 pneumonitis), resulting in dose reduction in central lung Seq cohort of the organs at risk (OAR) by 20%. Median PFS by RECIST (total/Seq/Con) was 5.9 mo, 95% CI: 4.9-13.1/ 6.2 mo, 95% CI: 3.5-12.6/ 5.9 mo, 95% CI: 3.1-18.0. RECIST best response was 11% CR, 57% PR, 6% SD, and 26% PD. Treatment past first progression was allowed, and time to second line therapy (chemotherapy) by arm (Seq/Con) was NR/17.5 months. Median OS has not been reached with median follow up of 15mo. PDL1 status did not impact PFS (p = 0.64) nor OS (p = 0.77). Conclusions: Multisite SBRT and concurrent N/Ip was well tolerated. Responses appear durable as median OS was not reached. Multimodality therapy with mSBRT and dual checkpoint inhibitor therapy resulted in impressive tumor control and clinical benefit with promising efficacy. Clinical trial information: NCT03223155 .

© 2018 Elsevier Inc. Cancer cooperative groups have historically played a critical role in the advancement of non–small-cell lung cancer therapy. Representatives from cooperative groups worldwide convene at the International Lung Cancer Congress annually. The International Lung Cancer Congress had its 17th anniversary in the summer of 2016. The present review highlights the thoracic malignancy studies discussed by presenters. The included studies are merely a sample of the trials of thoracic malignancies ongoing globally.

INTRODUCTION: We investigated the potential impact of stage migration because of positron-emission tomography (PET) scan staging on survival in the locally advanced (stage IIIA/B) NSCLC setting.METHODS: In PROCLAIM, 598 patients with stage IIIA/B nonsquamous NSCLC (intent-to-treat population) were randomized to either pemetrexed plus cisplatin and concurrent thoracic radiotherapy for 3 cycles followed by 4 cycles of pemetrexed consolidation or etoposide plus cisplatin and concurrent thoracic radiotherapy for 2 cycles followed by a consolidation platinum-based doublet regimen for up to 2 cycles. Baseline PET scan (PET Yes versus No) was one of the stratification factors. Subgroup analyses (PET Yes versus No) of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were conducted on the intent-to-treat population regardless of treatment, as the study did not show superior efficacy for either arm.RESULTS: Majority (491 of 598; 82.1%) of patients had a baseline PET scan staging performed. A longer median OS (PET Yes versus No: 27.2 versus 20.8; hazard ratio = 0.81, p = 0.130) and an improved median PFS (PET Yes versus No: 11.3 versus 9.2; hazard ratio = 0.73, p = 0.012) were observed for patients with PET scans compared to those with conventional staging in both treatment arms.CONCLUSIONS: Both a significantly improved PFS and a numerically longer OS in the PET Yes subgroup, compared to patients with conventional staging, are consistent with improved survival due to stage migration. The magnitude of differences in OS and PFS based on PET scan is a reminder of the potential for factors other than the therapeutic intervention to affect outcomes.

Background The optimal TRT regimen for LSCLC remains to be defined. CALGB 30610/RTOG 0538 started as a 3 arm study designed to discontinue one of 2 experimental TRT arms based on interim toxicity assessment, while the remaining arm would be compared against standard 4500 cGy (twice-daily) TRT. Methods Per protocol, the interim endpoint was calculated based on treatment related grade 3+ non-hematologic toxicity, grade 4 hematologic toxicity, failure to complete 4 cycles of chemotherapy, and any grade 5 toxicity. The analysis included the initial 70 patients assigned to each of the 7000 cGy (once daily) and the 6120 cGy (concomitant boost) study arms. The initial analysis was conducted May 21, 2012 and an updated analysis of the same patient population was performed April 15, 2019. Results There was not a significant difference in toxicity scoring between the regimens, either in the 2012 assessment or the updated analysis. Overall grade 3, 4, and 5 treatment related adverse events were 21.4%, 54.3%, and 0% for 7000 cGy TRT compared with 20.0%, 57.1% and 1.4% for 6120 cGy TRT, while rates of non-hematologic toxicity were 10.0%. 12.9% and 0% for 7000 cGy TRT compared with 12.9%, 14.3%, and 1.4% with 6120 cGy TRT. Grade 3 pneumonitis was reported in 2 patients (2.9 %) in each cohort. Grade 4 dyspnea was observed in 4 patients (5.7 %) in the 6120 cGy cohort but was not reported in patients treated with 7000 cGy. Conclusions Both TRT regimens, 7000 cGy daily and 6120 cGy concomitant boost, concurrent with cisplatin and etoposide chemotherapy, appear to be tolerable without unexpected toxicity. A decision to discontinue the 6120 cGy arm in December 2012 was based on the toxicity distribution, as a significant difference in overall toxicity was not observed. Further details of toxicity and the scoring system applied will be presented. The phase III portion of the study comparing 7000 cGy TRT to 4500 cGy TRT is near completion. Clinical trial identification CALGB 30610 / RTOG 0538 Identifier: NCT00632853. Legal entity responsible for the study Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology. Funding National Cancer Institute. Support: U10CA180821, U10CA180882, U10CA180868, U10CA180820, U10CA233330, U10CA180888; https://acknowledgments.alliancefound.org . Disclosure All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

Summary Background Increased detection of small-sized, peripheral, non-small-cell lung cancer has renewed interest in sublobar resection instead of lobectomy, the traditional standard of care for early-stage lung cancer. We aimed to assess morbidity and mortality associated with lobar and sublobar resection for early-stage lung cancer. Methods CALGB/Alliance 140503 is a multicentre, international, non-inferiority, phase 3 trial in patients with peripheral non-small-cell lung cancer clinically staged as T1aN0. Patients were recruited from 69 academic and community-based institutions in Australia, Canada, and the USA. Patients were randomly assigned intraoperatively to either lobar or sublobar resection. The random assignment was based on permuted block randomisation without concealment and was stratified according to radiographic tumour size, histology, and smoking status. The primary endpoint of the trial is disease-free survival; here, we report a post-hoc, exploratory, comparative analysis of perioperative mortality and morbidity associated with lobar and sublobar resection. Perioperative mortality was defined as death from any cause within 30 days and 90 days of surgical intervention and was calculated for all randomised patients. Morbidity was graded using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0. All analyses were done on an intention-to-treat basis for randomised patients with data available. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00499330. Findings Between June 15, 2007, and March 13, 2017, 697 patients were randomly allocated to either lobar resection (n=357) or sublobar resection (n=340; 59% wedge resection). Six (0·9%) patients died by 30 days, four (1·1%) after lobar resection and two (0·6%) after sublobar resection; by 90 days, ten (1·4%) patients had died, six (1·7%) after lobar resection and four (1·2%) after sublobar resection (difference at 30 days, 0·5%, 95% CI −1·1 to 2·3; difference at 90 days, 0·5%, 95% CI −1·5 to 2·6). An adverse event of any grade occurred in 193 (54%) of 355 patients after lobar resection and 172 (51%) of 337 patients after sublobar resection. Adverse events of grade 3 or worse occurred in 54 (15%) patients assigned lobar resection and in 48 (14%) patients assigned sublobar resection. No differences between surgical approaches were noted in cardiac or pulmonary complications. Grade 3 haemorrhage (requiring transfusion) occurred in six (2%) patients assigned lobar resection and eight (2%) patients assigned sublobar resection. Prolonged air leak occurred in nine (3%) patients after lobar resection and two (1%) patients after sublobar resection. Interpretation Our post-hoc analysis showed that perioperative mortality and morbidity did not seem to differ between lobar and sublobar resection in physically and functionally fit patients with clinical T1aN0 non-small-cell lung cancer. These data may affect the daily choices made by patients and their doctors in establishing the best treatment approach for stage I lung cancer. Funding National Cancer Institute.

OBJECTIVES: We report 2-year results from CheckMate 141 to establish the long-term efficacy and safety profile of nivolumab and outcomes by tumor PD-L1 expression in patients with recurrent or metastatic (R/M),platinum-refractory squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). METHODS: Patients with R/M SCCHN with tumor progression/recurrence within 6 months of platinum therapy were randomized 2:1 to nivolumab 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks or investigator’s choice (IC). Primary endpoint: overall survival (OS). Data cutoff: September 2017. RESULTS: With 24.2 months’ minimum follow-up, nivolumab (n =240) continued to improve OS vs IC (n = 121), hazard ratio (HR) = 0.68 (95% CI 0.54–0.86). Nivolumab nearly tripled the estimated 24-month OS rate (16.9%) vs IC (6.0%), and demonstrated OS benefit across patients with tumor PD-L1 expression ≥1% (HR [95% CI] = 0.55 [0.39–0.78]) and < 1% (HR [95% CI] =0.73 [0.49–1.09]), and regardless of tumor HPV status. Estimated OS rates at 18, 24, and 30 months with nivolumab were consistent irrespective of PD-L1 expression (< 1%/≥1%). In the nivolumab arm, there were no observed differences in baseline characteristics or safety profile between long-term survivors and the overall population. Grade 3–4 treatment-related adverse event rates were 15.3% and 36.9% for nivolumab and IC, respectively. CONCLUSION: Nivolumab significantly improved OS at the primary analysis and demonstrated prolonged OS benefit vs IC and maintenance of a manageable and consistent safety profile with 2-year follow-up. OS benefit was observed with nivolumab irrespective of PD-L1 expression and HPV status. (Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT02105636)

Introduction Concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is standard therapy for locally advanced NSCLC (LA-NSCLC) patients. This study was performed to examine thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) parameters and their impact on patient survival. Methods We collected individual patient data from 3600 LA-NSCLC patients participating in 16 cooperative group trials of concurrent CRT. The primary TRT parameters examined included field design strategy (elective nodal irradiation [ENI] compared to involved-field TRT (IF-TRT)), total dose, and biologically effective dose (BED). Hazard ratios (HRs) for overall survival were calculated with univariable and multivariable Cox models. Results TRT doses ranged from 60 Gy to 74 Gy with most treatments administered once-daily. ENI was associated with poorer survival than IF-TRT (univariable HR = 1.37, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.24–1.51, p 60 Gy to 66 Gy), and high total dose (>66 Gy to 74 Gy). With reference to the low-dose group, the multivariable HRs were 1.08 for the medium-dose group (95% CI: 0.93–1.25) and 1.12 for the high-dose group (95% CI: 0.97–1.30).The univariate p = 0.054 and multivariable p = 0.17. BED was grouped as follows: low ( 55.5 Gy10). With reference to the low-BED group, the HR was 1.00 (95% CI: 0.85–1.18) for the medium-BED group and 1.10 (95% CI: 0.93–1.31) for the high-BED group. The univariable p = 0.076 and multivariable p = 0.16. Conclusions For LA-NSCLC patients treated with concurrent CRT, IF-TRT was associated with significantly better survival than ENI-TRT. TRT total and BED dose levels were not significantly associated with patient survival. Future progress will require research focusing on better systemic therapy and TRT.

The most common histology of non-thyroid head and neck cancer is squamous cell carcinoma. Common risk factors for head and neck malignancies include tobacco and alcohol abuse and viruses, including Epstein-Barr Virus (EBV) and Human Papillomavirus (HPV). Early stage disease is often treated with surgery or radiation therapy alone, while more advanced disease often requires a multi-modality approach including systemic chemotherapy, radiation, and surgical resection. In the curative setting, current clinical trials are evaluating the de-escalation of therapy in HPV-releated head and neck cancer. In the metastatic setting, clinical trials have focused on using immunotherapy agents to improve outcomes. This review chapter will discuss the etiology and common presentations of head and neck cancer, and also analyze recent advancements in the treatment of the disease. Key words: chemoradiation, head and neck cancer, human papillomavirus, immunotherapy, oropharynx, squamous cell carcinoma, treatment deescalation

The most common histology of non-thyroid head and neck cancer is squamous cell carcinoma. Common risk factors for head and neck malignancies include tobacco and alcohol abuse and viruses, including Epstein-Barr Virus (EBV) and Human Papillomavirus (HPV). Early stage disease is often treated with surgery or radiation therapy alone, while more advanced disease often requires a multi-modality approach including systemic chemotherapy, radiation, and surgical resection. In the curative setting, current clinical trials are evaluating the de-escalation of therapy in HPV-releated head and neck cancer. In the metastatic setting, clinical trials have focused on using immunotherapy agents to improve outcomes. This review chapter will discuss the etiology and common presentations of head and neck cancer, and also analyze recent advancements in the treatment of the disease. Key words: chemoradiation, head and neck cancer, human papillomavirus, immunotherapy, oropharynx, squamous cell carcinoma, treatment deescalation

BACKGROUND Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) alterations are associated with multiple cancers. Current EGFR‐directed therapies have led to increased efficacy but are associated with specific side effects. The antibody‐drug conjugate depatuxizumab mafodotin (depatux‐m) targets EGFR with a monoclonal antibody linked to a cytotoxin, and is highly tumor‐specific. METHODS This phase 1/2 study evaluated the safety, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy of depatux‐m in patients who had advanced solid tumors with known wild‐type EGFR overexpression, amplification, or mutated EGFR variant III. A 3 + 3 dose escalation was used, and 2 dosing schedules were evaluated. Depatux‐m also was manufactured under an alternate process to reduce the drug load and improve the safety profile, and it was tested at the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). In another cohort, prolonged infusion time of depatux‐m was evaluated; and a cohort with confirmed EGFR amplification also was evaluated at the MTD. RESULTS Fifty‐six patients were treated. The MTD and the recommended phase 2 dose for depatux‐m was 3.0 mg/kg. Common adverse events (AEs) were blurred vision (48%) and fatigue (41%). A majority of patients (66%) experienced 1 or more ocular AEs. Grade 3 or 4 AEs were observed in 43% of patients. One patient with EGFR‐amplified, triple‐negative breast cancer had a partial response. Stable disease was observed in 23% of patients. Pharmacokinetics revealed that depatux‐m exposures were approximately dose‐proportional. CONCLUSIONS Depatux‐m resulted in infrequent nonocular AEs but increased ocular AEs. Patient follow‐up confirmed that ocular AEs were reversible. Lowering the drug‐antibody ratio did not decrease the number of ocular AEs. A partial response in 1 patient with EGFR‐amplified disease provides the opportunity to study depatux‐m in diseases with a high incidence of EGFR amplification. Cancer 2018;124:2174‐83. © 2018 The Authors. Cancer published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Cancer Society. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes., This phase 1 study evaluates the safety, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy of depatuxizumab mafodotin (depatux‐m), an antibody‐drug conjugate targeting epidermal growth factor receptor in patients with solid tumors. Depatux‐m is associated with generally reversible ocular side effects, and 1 patient with EGFR‐amplified breast cancer had a partial response, suggesting an opportunity for further study of depatux‐m.

Purpose Nivolumab, a programmed death-1 inhibitor, prolonged overall survival compared with docetaxel in two independent phase III studies in previously treated patients with advanced squamous (CheckMate 017; ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01642004) or nonsquamous (CheckMate 057; ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01673867) non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We report updated results, including a pooled analysis of the two studies. Methods Patients with stage IIIB/IV squamous (N = 272) or nonsquamous (N = 582) NSCLC and disease progression during or after prior platinum-based chemotherapy were randomly assigned 1:1 to nivolumab (3 mg/kg every 2 weeks) or docetaxel (75 mg/m2 every 3 weeks). Minimum follow-up for survival was 24.2 months. Results Two-year overall survival rates with nivolumab versus docetaxel were 23% (95% CI, 16% to 30%) versus 8% (95% CI, 4% to 13%) in squamous NSCLC and 29% (95% CI, 24% to 34%) versus 16% (95% CI, 12% to 20%) in nonsquamous NSCLC; relative reductions in the risk of death with nivolumab versus docetaxel remained similar to those reported in the primary analyses. Durable responses were observed with nivolumab; 10 (37%) of 27 confirmed responders with squamous NSCLC and 19 (34%) of 56 with nonsquamous NSCLC had ongoing responses after 2 years’ minimum follow-up. No patient in either docetaxel group had an ongoing response. In the pooled analysis, the relative reduction in the risk of death with nivolumab versus docetaxel was 28% (hazard ratio, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.62 to 0.84), and rates of treatment-related adverse events were lower with nivolumab than with docetaxel (any grade, 68% v 88%; grade 3 to 4, 10% v 55%). Conclusion Nivolumab provides long-term clinical benefit and a favorable tolerability profile compared with docetaxel in previously treated patients with advanced NSCLC.

Introduction: We previously reported that progression-free survival (PFS) may be a candidate surrogate end point for overall survival (OS) in first-line extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) using data from three randomized trials (Foster, Cancer 2011). In this validation study (N0424-Alliance), we assessed the patient-level and trial-level surrogacy of PFS using data from seven new first-line phase II/III ES-SCLC trials and across all 10 trials as well (seven new, three previous). Methods: Individual patient data were utilized across the seven new trials (2259 patients) and all 10 trials (2855 patients). Patient-level surrogacy (Kendall’s τ) was assessed using the Clayton copula bivariate survival model. Trial-level surrogacy was assessed through association of the log hazard ratios on OS and PFS across trials, including weighted (by trial size) least squares regression (WLS R 2 ) of Cox model effects and correlation of the copula effects (copula R 2 ). The minimum effect on the surrogate (MES) needed to detect a nonzero treatment effect on OS was also calculated. Results: The median OS and PFS across all 10 trials were 9.8 and 5.9 months, respectively. PFS showed strong surrogacy within the 7 new trials (copula R 2 = 0.90 [standard error = 0.27], WLS R 2 = 0.83 [95% confidence interval: 0.43, 0.95]; MES = 0.67, and Kendall’s τ = 0.58) and across all 10 trials (copula R 2 = 0.81 [standard errors = 0.25], WLS R 2 = 0.77 [95% confidence interval: 0.47–0.91], MES = 0.70, and Kendall’s τ = 0.57). Conclusions: PFS demonstrated strong surrogacy for OS in first-line ES-SCLC based on this external validation study of individual patient data. PFS is a good alternative end point to OS and should be considered when resource constraints (time or patient) might make it useful or desirable in place of OS. Additional analyses are needed to assess its appropriateness for targeted agents in this disease setting.

Introduction Patients with stage III non-small-cell lung cancer and poor performance status and/or weight loss do not seem to benefit from standard therapy. Based on the preclinical interaction between epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors and radiation, we designed a trial of induction chemotherapy followed by thoracic radiotherapy and concurrent erlotinib. Methods Patients with poor-risk unresectable stage III non-small-cell lung cancer received two cycles of carboplatin at an AUC of 5 and nab-paclitaxel at 100 mg/m on days 1 and 8 every 21 days, followed by erlotinib administered concurrently with thoracic radiotherapy. Maintenance was not permitted. Molecular analysis was performed in available specimens. Seventy-two eligible patients were required to test whether the 1-year survival rate was less than 50% or greater than or equal to 65% with approximately 90% power at a significance level of 0.10. Results From March 2008 to October 2011, 78 patients were enrolled, three of whom were ineligible. The median age was 68 (range, 39-88) and 32% were aged greater than or equal to 75 years. Patients were evenly distributed between stages IIIA and IIIB and the majority had performance status 2. The overall response rate was 67% and the disease control rate was 93%. Treatment was well tolerated. The median PFS and OS were 11 and 17 months, respectively. The overall 12-month OS was 57%, which narrowly missed the prespecified target for significance. Conclusions Patients with poor-risk stage III non-small-cell lung cancer had better than expected outcomes with a regimen of induction carboplatin/nab-paclitaxel followed by thoracic radiotherapy and erlotinib. However, as per the statistical design, the 12-month OS was not sufficiently high to warrant further studies.

BACKGROUND Patients with advanced squamous-cell non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who have disease progression during or after first-line chemotherapy have limited treatment options. This randomized, open-label, international, phase 3 study evaluated the efficacy and safety of nivolumab, a fully human IgG4 programmed death 1 (PD-1) immune-checkpoint-inhibitor antibody, as compared with docetaxel in this patient population. METHODS We randomly assigned 272 patients to receive nivolumab, at a dose of 3 mg per kilogram of body weight every 2 weeks, or docetaxel, at a dose of 75 mg per square meter of body-surface area every 3 weeks. The primary end point was overall survival. RESULTS The median overall survival was 9.2 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 7.3 to 13.3) with nivolumab versus 6.0 months (95% CI, 5.1 to 7.3) with docetaxel. The risk of death was 41% lower with nivolumab than with docetaxel (hazard ratio, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.44 to 0.79; P

Casitas B-lineage lymphoma (CBL) is an E3 ubiquitin ligase and a molecule of adaptor that we have shown is important for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We investigated if MET is a target of CBL and if enhanced in CBL-altered NSCLC. We showed that CBL wildtype cells have lower MET expression than CBL mutant cells. Ubiquitination of MET was also decreased in CBL mutant cells compared to wildtype cells. Mutant cells were also more sensitive to MET inhibitor SU11274 than wild-type cells. sh-RNA-mediated knockdown of CBL enhanced cell motility and colony formation in NSCLC cells, and these activities were inhibited by SU11274. Assessment of the phospho-kinome showed decreased phosphorylation of pathways involving MET, paxillin, EPHA2, and VEGFR. When CBL was knocked down in the mutant cell line H1975 (erlotinib-resistant), it became sensitive to MET inhibition. Our findings suggest that CBL status is a potential positive indicator for MET-targeted therapeutics in NSCLC.

Background Oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) arising in nonsmokers and nondrinkers remains poorly characterized. We hypothesized that these patients had prior exposure to metallic dental hardware. Methods We utilized a questionnaire querying the lifetime oral health status of 54 patients. Demographics and extensive oral health history were collected. Results The majority of patients (74%) had prior exposure to metallic dental hardware. The younger population with almost exclusively oral tongue cancer had a high prevalence of metallic orthodontic braces (40%) within 15 years before diagnosis. In the 51+ year age group, 82% had crowns, dental implants, and/or dentures with metallic elements. Conclusion Exposure to metallic dental hardware has increased in the past few decades given the rise of orthodontic braces and older adults retaining more teeth. Although this study does not prove a causal relationship between oral cavity SCC and dental hardware, this is a step toward identifying and investigating their role.

Purpose Tumor overexpression of cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) has been associated with worse outcome in non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) 30203, we found that the selective COX-2 inhibitor celecoxib in addition to chemotherapy in advanced NSCLC improved progression-free and overall survival in patients with moderate to high COX-2 expression by immunohistochemistry (IHC). CALGB 30801 (Alliance) was designed to prospectively confirm that finding. Patients and Methods Patients with NSCLC (stage IIIB with pleural effusion or stage IV according to American Joint Committee on Cancer [sixth edition] criteria) were preregistered, and biopsy specimens were analyzed for COX-2 by IHC. Patients with COX-2 expression ≥ 2, performance status of 0 to 2, and normal organ function were eligible. Chemotherapy was determined by histology: carboplatin plus pemetrexed for nonsquamous NSCLC and carboplatin plus gemcitabine for squamous histology. Patients were randomly assigned to celecoxib (400 mg twice per day; arm A) or placebo (arm B). The primary objective was to demonstrate improvement in progression-free survival in patients with COX-2 index ≥ 4 with hazard ratio of 0.645 with approximately 85% power at two-sided significance level of .05. Results The study was halted for futility after 312 of the planned 322 patients with COX-2 index ≥ 2 were randomly assigned. There were no significant differences between the groups (hazard ratio, 1.046 for COX-2 ≥ 4). Subset analyses evaluating histology, chemotherapy regimen, and incremental COX-2 expression did not demonstrate any advantage for COX-2 inhibition. Elevation of baseline urinary metabolite of prostaglandin E2, indicating activation of the COX-2 pathway, was a negative prognostic factor. Values above the third quartile may have been a predictive factor. Conclusion COX-2 expression by IHC failed to select patients who could benefit from selective COX-2 inhibition. Urinary metabolite of prostaglandin E2 may be able to identify patients who could benefit from COX-2 inhibition.

A randomized phase II trial conducted by the Cancer and Leukemia Group B in patients with unresectable non-small cell lung cancer showed that induction chemotherapy followed by concurrent radiotherapy and chemotherapy was feasible when cisplatin was administered together with either gemcitabine, vinorelbine, or paclitaxel. The dominant toxicity was esophagitis. Preliminary survival data are encouraging. Other trials in progress or planned will elucidate the relative contributions of induction and concurrent therapy to outcome. A phase I study has shown that it is feasible to combine docetaxel (Taxotere: Aventis, Antony, France) with concomitant radiotherapy in patients with advanced non-small cell lung or esophageal cancer. Giving the drug once every 3 weeks during standard radiotherapy, the maximum tolerated dose is 40 mg/m

Purpose: Squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) is a lethal cancer with a suboptimal 5-year overall survival of approximately 50% with surgery and/or definitive chemoradiotherapy. Novel treatments are thus urgently awaited. Immunotherapy with checkpoint blockade has emerged as a promising option for patients with recurrent/metastatic SCCHN; however, it has not been investigated in the curative-intent setting yet. The purpose of this study was to investigate the T-cell receptor repertoire and the tumor microenvironment in tumor tissues of SCCHN patients with locoregionally advanced disease. Experimental Design: We performed T-cell receptor sequencing of tumor tissues from 44 patients with locoregionally advanced SCCHN prior to treatment with definitive chemoradiotherapy and correlated the T-cell clonality and the mRNA expression levels of immune-related genes with clinicopathologic parameters. Results: Clonal expansion of T cells was significantly higher in human papilloma virus (HPV)–negative compared with HPV-positive tumors, signifying more robust antigen presentation in HPV-negative tumors. The latter was supported by the higher percentage of HPV-negative tumors expressing HLA-A protein compared with HPV-positive tumors (P = 0.049). Higher GRZB levels correlated significantly with longer recurrence-free survival (log-rank, P = 0.003) independent of tumor size, nodal stage, and HPV status. Conclusions: Our findings support clonal expansion of T cells in SCCHN patients with locoregionally advanced disease and imply differences in the antigen presentation capacity between HPV-negative and HPV-positive tumors. Elevated GRZB mRNA levels may also serve as a favorable and independent predictor of outcome in SCCHN patients treated with chemoradiotherapy. These data provide rationale for the introduction of immunotherapeutic approaches in the curative-intent setting. Clin Cancer Res; 23(16); 4897–907. ©2017 AACR.

Over the past few years, there have been considerable advances in the treatments available to patients with metastatic or locally advanced NSCLC, particularly those who have progressed during first-line treatment. Some of the treatment options available to patients are discussed here, with a focus on checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapies (nivolumab and pembrolizumab) and antiangiogenic agents (bevacizumab, ramucirumab, and nintedanib). It is hypothesized that combining immunotherapy with antiangiogenic treatment may have a synergistic effect and enhance the efficacy of both treatments. In this review, we explore the theory and potential of this novel treatment option for patients with advanced NSCLC. We discuss the growing body of evidence that proangiogenic factors can modulate the immune response (both by reducing T-cell infiltration into the tumor microenvironment and through systemic effects on immune-regulatory cell function), and we examine the preclinical evidence for combining these treatments. Potential challenges are also considered, and we review the preliminary evidence of clinical efficacy and safety with this novel combination in a variety of solid tumor types. (C) 2016 International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Despite the efficacy of a number of first-line treatments, most patients with advanced-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) experience disease progression that warrants further treatment. In this review, we examine the role of novel active agents for patients who progress after first-line therapy and who are not candidates for targeted therapies. More therapeutic options are needed for the management of patients with NSCLC after failure of first-line chemotherapy. A PubMed search was performed for articles from January 2012 to May 2015 using the keywords NSCLC, antiangiogenic, immunotherapy, second-line, novel therapies and English language articles only. Relevant papers were reviewed; papers outside that period were considered on a case-by-case basis. A search of oncology congresses was performed to identify relevant abstracts over this period. In recent years, antiangiogenic agents and immune checkpoint inhibitors have been added to our armamentarium to treat patients with advanced NSCLC who have progressed on first-line chemotherapy. These include nintedanib, a triple angiokinase inhibitor; ramucirumab, a vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 antibody; and nivolumab, pembrolizumab and atezolizumab, just three of a growing list of antibodies targeting the programmed death receptor-1 (PD-1)/PD ligand-1 pathway. Predictive and prognostic factors in NSCLC treatment will help to optimise treatment with these novel agents. The approval of new treatments for patients with NSCLC after the failure of first-line chemotherapy has increased options after a decade of few advances, and holds promise for future evolution of the management of NSCLC.

8517 Background: Standard front-line chemotherapy for advanced MPM is (Pem and a platinum; optimal treatment duration is unknown. We performed a randomized phase 2 trial (NCT01085630) to determine if continuation of single-agent Pem after 4-6 cycles of Pem-platinum would improve progression-free survival (PFS). Methods: Eligible pts had histologically confirmed unresectable MPM, and performance status (PS) 0-1. Pts with at least stable disease following 4-6 cycles of Pem-platinum were stratified by first-line regimen (cis- or carboplatin) and histology (epithelioid versus other) and randomized 1:1 to Obs or continuation of Pem until progression. The primary endpoint was PFS. We assumed that Obs produced a median (m) PFS of 3 months (mo) and Pem would yield a 100% improvement in mPFS to 6 mo; 60 eligible pts (30 per arm) were to be randomized. Results: 72 pts from 30 sites registered 12/10-6/16. The study closed early due to slow accrual once 53 pts were randomized; 49 eligible pts (22 Obs, 27 Pem) are included in the efficacy analysis. Pt characteristics (Obs/Pem): age: median (range) 70 (39-85)/70 (52-87); male 68%/78%; PS 0 27%/33%; epithelioid histology 77%/70%; first-line cisplatin 27%/26%. A median of 4 cycles of Pem (range 1-33) was delivered; 22% of pts required dose modification. mPFS was 3 mo on Obs and 3.4 mo on Pem (hazard ratio (HR) 0.99; 95% CI: 0.51-1.90; p=0.9733). Median overall survival (mOS) was 11.8 mo for Obs, and 16.3 mo for Pem (HR 0.86; 95% CI 0.44-1.71; p=0.6737). Toxicities ≥ grade 3 on Pem included anemia 8%, lymphopenia 8%, neutropenia 4%, and fatigue 4%; there were no grade 5 toxicities. A higher baseline level of serum mesothelin related peptide (SMRP) was associated with worse PFS (HR 1.861, p=0.049). Baseline osteopontin did not significantly affect PFS (p=0.3630). Conclusions: Although it was well tolerated, maintenance Pem following initial Pem/platinum doublet chemotherapy does not improve PFS in MPM patients. High baseline SMRP was associated with shorter PFS. Support: U10CA180821, U10CA180882; https://acknowledgments.alliancefound.org . Clinical trial information: NCT01085630.

9088 Background: KEYNOTE-024 established single-agent P as a 1st-line option for pts with metastatic NSCLC without targetable alterations and PD-L1 tumor proportion score (TPS) ≥ 50%. KEYNOTE-189 and 407 established concurrent C + P as a treatment option irrespective of PD-L1 expression. In this randomized phase II selection trial, we explored sequencing of C and P in this pt. population. Methods: Eligible pts were randomized 1:1 to (arm A) C (carboplatin (AUC 6) + pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 (non-squamous) or paclitaxel 200 mg/m2 (squamous)) x 4 cycles followed by P 200 mg x 4 cycles, or the reverse sequence (arm B) of P x 4 cycles followed by C x 4 cycles. After 8 cycles, pts on both arms were eligible to receive maintenance P for up to 24 months. Primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) per RECIST 1.1 by independent review. Secondary endpoints included progression free survival (PFS) per RECIST 1.1 and overall survival (OS). Efficacy endpoints were also evaluated by PD-L1 expression. Results: 89 pts (47 arm B & 42 arm A) were enrolled and are included in the analysis (PD-L1 TPS 0/1-49%/≥50% = 24 pts (34%)/25 pts (36%)/21 pts (30%)). There was no significant difference in ORR (36% vs 38%, p = 0.829), median PFS (2.7 vs 5.5 months (mo), HR 1.25, 95% CI 0.77-2.02, p = 0.363) or OS (13.1 vs 19.8 mo, HR 1.25, 95% CI 0.69-2.25, p = 0.4573), arm B (Px4→C) vs arm A (Cx4→P). Multivariable Cox regression analysis demonstrated significant interaction between treatment and PD-L1 TPS ( < 50% vs ≥ 50%) for PFS (HR 6.76, 95% CI 2.14-21.35, p = 0.0011) and a trend for OS (HR 5.02, 95% CI 0.92-27.55, p = 0.0632), arm B vs arm A. Incidence of grade ≥3 adverse events was 71% for arm A and 65% for arm B. No new safety signals were observed. Conclusions: In pts with stage IV NSCLC and PD-L1 TPS ≥ 50% there was an observed improvement in PFS and OS in favor of C followed by P vs P x 4 followed by C. Given small # of pts and trial design, this observation should be considered hypothesis-generating, but supports further exploration of sequential C + P in this setting. Support:Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.; https://acknowledgments.alliancefound.org Clinical trial information: NCT02591615.

TPS9114 Background: Transforming growth factor β (TGF- β) promotes tumor progression via immune- and non–immune-related processes. M7824 is an innovative first-in-class bifunctional fusion protein composed of 2 extracellular domains of TGF-βRII (a TGF-β “trap”) fused to a human IgG1 monoclonal antibody against PD-L1. Targeting these independent and complementary pathways may restore and enhance antitumor responses. An expansion cohort of the NCT02517398 study of patients with advanced NSCLC (n = 80) treated with M7824 in the second-line setting presented at ESMO 2018 showed an objective response rate of 86% in the subgroup with high PD-L1 tumor expression at the recommended phase 2 dose (1200 mg intravenously [IV] every 2 weeks [Q2W]). Observed data support the hypothesis that M7824 may be superior to other PD-(L)1 inhibitors, including pembrolizumab, for the treatment of NSCLC. Based on the promising antitumor activity and manageable safety profile, this study will evaluate M7824 treatment in patients with advanced NSCLC in the 1L setting. Methods: Here we present a global, randomized trial comparing M7824 vs pembrolizumab in the 1L treatment of patients with metastatic NSCLC with high PD-L1 expression levels. Patients in this study must have a histologically confirmed diagnosis of advanced NSCLC with high PD-L1 expression on tumor cells (defined as either ≥80% by the Dako 73-10 pharmDx kit or ≥50% by the Dako 22C3 pharmDx kit since both assays are expected to select a similar patient population at their respective cut-offs). ECOG performance status must be 0 or 1. Patients must not have received prior systemic treatment for advanced NSCLC. Patients with tumors with actionable mutations (for which targeted therapy is locally approved) are not eligible. Patients will receive 1200 mg Q2W or pembrolizumab 200 mg Q3W as an IV infusion until confirmed disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or trial withdrawal. Dual primary endpoints are progression-free survival and best overall response; key secondary endpoints include overall survival, duration of response, and safety. Estimated enrollment is 300 patients. Clinical trial information: NCT03631706.

3011 Background: Telisotuzumab vedotin (ABBV-399; teliso-v [T]) is a c-Met–targeted antibody and MMAE drug conjugate. Activity of T was shown in late-line c-Met+ non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) irrespective of EGFR mutation (M+) status. We present mature data from the T+ erlotinib (E) cohort of a phase 1b study (NCT02099058) by EGFR M+ status. Methods: T was administered at 2.4 mg/kg (dose-escalation phase) or 2.7 mg/kg IV Q3W, and E at 150 mg PO QD/prior tolerated dose in adult patients (pts) with advanced NSCLC. Efficacy-evaluable pts were c-Met+ (central lab IHC H-score ≥150 or local lab MET amplification/Ex 14 skipping) and had ≥1 postbaseline scan or discontinued study. EGFR M+ was defined as del19 or L858R by local lab. PK was assessed. Results: As of Dec 2018, 42 NSCLC pts received T+E; 37 were c-MET+ (36 evaluable; 35 H-score≥150, 1 MET amplified). Median age was 65 years, 25 pts (69%) had ECOG PS 1, 29 (81%) were EGFR M+ (97% had prior EGFR TKI, 55% 3rd-generation TKI, 69% TKI as last prior therapy, and 62% platinum doublet). All-grade (Gr; ≥20%) adverse events (AEs) were dermatitis acneiform (38%), diarrhea (36%), peripheral motor/sensory neuropathy (52%; 7% Gr 3), dyspnea, fatigue, hypoalbuminemia (31% each), decreased appetite, nausea (24% each), asthenia, vomiting (21% each). Gr ≥3 (≥10%) AE: pulmonary embolism (14%). PK of T+E was similar to single-agent T. The table presents efficacy data. Conclusions: These data suggest acceptable safety and promising activity of T+E and support further study in EGFR M+ c-Met+ NSCLC pts for whom frontline EGFR TKI failed. Clinical trial information: NCT02099058. [Table: see text]

8510 Background: CRT is standard treatment (Tx) for pts with unresectable stage III NSCLC. Vel, a potent oral PARP1/2 inhibitor, interferes with repair of chemotherapy- or radiation-induced DNA damage. In a phase 2 study, Vel showed favorable efficacy vs placebo when added to C/P in stage IV NSCLC. The reported phase 1 trial assessed the safety and efficacy of Vel + C/P-based CRT in Tx of stage III NSCLC (NCT02412371). Methods: Eligible pts (≥18 yr, unresectable stage III NSCLC, no prior NSCLC therapy) received Vel + CRT of weekly C area under the curve (AUC) 2 + P 45 mg/m2 weekly + 60 Gy (2 Gy/day) RT over 6–9 weeks (wk). Vel was dose escalated from 60 mg twice daily (BID) to 240 mg BID followed by Vel 120 mg BID added to consolidation therapy (CON) once every 3 wk of C AUC 6 + P 200 mg/m2 for 2 cycles (cohort 1–5). Cohort 6 received Vel 240 mg BID + CRT followed by Vel 240 mg BID + CON. Samples for pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis were collected on wk 4 day –3. The primary endpoint was to establish the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of Vel + CRT/Vel + CON. Results: As of Sep 2018, 48 pts enrolled into cohorts 1–6 at Vel 60 mg/120 mg (n = 7), 80 mg/120 mg (n = 9), 120 mg/120 mg (n = 7), 200 mg/120 mg (n = 8), 240 mg/120 mg (n = 12), and 240 mg/240 mg (n = 5) added to CRT/CON; median age 65 yr (range, 48–81). Vel PK was dose proportional; 39 (81.3%) pts completed therapy. Grade ≥3 Tx-emergent adverse events (AEs) were reported in 37 (77.1%) pts; anemia and febrile neutropenia (10.4% each) were the most common. Serious AEs were observed in 19 (39.6%) pts. Dose-limiting toxicities occurred at 200 mg/120 mg (n = 1; influenza and pneumonia), 240 mg/120 mg (n = 1; insomnia), and 240 mg/240 mg (n = 2; febrile neutropenia, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, esophagitis, suprapubic pain, sepsis); Vel 240 mg BID + CRT/Vel 120 mg + CON was chosen as the maximum tolerated dose/RP2D. Of 41 pts evaluable for tumor assessment, 26 (63.4%) had a confirmed response. Interim median progression-free survival was 24.1 mo (range, 8.9 – not reached); updated results will be reported. Conclusions: Vel 240 + CRT/Vel 120 mg BID + CON was well tolerated with promising antitumor activity in stage III NSCLC and was determined as RP2D. Clinical trial information: NCT02412371.

TPS8574 Background: cCRT improves survival vs RT alone and is a global standard of care in patients (pts) with stage III NSCLC, but survival remains poor for these pts. Combining PD-1/PD-L1-targeting immunotherapies and cCRT may lead to synergistic activity and improved outcomes. Tislelizumab (anti–PD-1) demonstrated clinical activity and tolerability in solid tumors, including NSCLC. This phase III, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study (RATIONALE 001) will evaluate efficacy and safety of tislelizumab + cCRT. Methods: Pts (N ≈ 840) will be randomized 1:1:1 in a 3-arm study design to evaluate whether the timing of giving tislelizumab earlier upfront with cCRT in addition to as consolidation (Arm 1) or giving tislelizumab as consolidation only (Arm 2) will improve outcomes vs cCRT alone (Arm 3; Table). RT will be given in 2 Gy fractions to a target dose of 60 Gy (30 fractions). Chemotherapy will be investigator’s choice of cisplatin + etoposide or carboplatin + paclitaxel. A safety analysis specific to the cisplatin + etoposide component of the cCRT + tislelizumab combination is planned. All sites must pass a radiation quality assurance review process. The primary endpoint is PFS. Secondary endpoints include ORR, OS, OS at 24 months, and safety. As an exploratory endpoint, blood and tumor biomarkers will be assessed for correlations with clinical benefit. With a one-sided α of 1.25%, a total of 580 PFS events are required to allow ≈ 90% power to detect a HR for progression or death of 0.7 for either pairwise comparison (Arm 1 vs Arm 3 or Arm 2 vs Arm 3). Key eligibility criteria are locally advanced, unresectable, stage III NSCLC; FDG-PET and brain imaging confirmation of stage III status; no prior treatment; and ECOG PS ≤ 1. PD-L1 expression assessment is not required prior to randomization. EudraCT number 2018-001132-22. Clinical trial information: NCT03745222. [Table: see text]

Objectives Chemoradiation therapy (CRT) remains a potentially curative treatment in patients with locally advanced head/neck cancer (LA-HNC). However, survival and other outcomes in older patients with head/neck cancer receiving chemoradiotherapy are not well established. This study was performed to elucidate selected outcomes in this patient population. Materials and Methods Retrospective study of LA-HNC patients ≥ 70 years of age who had received 5-fluorouracil-hydoxyurea-based CRT with a minimum of 3 years of follow up after therapy initiation was performed. Pre-treatment patient- and cancer-related characteristics were recorded. Survival data in addition to gastrostomy tube utilization, swallowing function, and hematologic toxicity were captured. Results Eighty-nine patients treated between 1997 and 2009 were eligible for analysis (median age, 76 years; range, 70–94; male, 61%; ECOG PS, 0–1 43%; stage IVA/B, 71%). 86 were evaluable for survival analysis. 5-year overall and event-free survival were both at 32% with a median follow-up time of 39.2 months. The majority (86.5%) were able to complete all planned treatment cycles. A significant proportion of patients, however, required gastrostomy tube during CRT (62%) and developed aspiration during swallowing evaluation post-treatment (44%). Several patients required hospice (9%) or skilled nursing facility (13%) referrals during treatment. Conclusion Select older adults with LA-HNC can still experience long-term benefits despite 5-year survival rates lower than those historically reported in younger patients undergoing identical CRT regimens although potentially at higher risk for acute toxicities. Assessment and selection of those who can tolerate more intense combined-modality strategies and their long-term outcomes merit further larger, prospective studies.

Lancet Oncology, The - In Press.Proof corrected by the author Available online since mardi 7 novembre 2017

Cytoskeletal and focal adhesion abnormalities are observed in several types of cancer, including lung cancer. We have previously reported that paxillin (PXN) was mutated, amplified, and overexpressed in a significant number of lung cancer patient samples, that PXN protein was upregulated in more advanced stages of lung cancer compared with lower stages, and that the PXN gene was also amplified in some pre-neoplastic lung lesions. Among the mutations investigated, we previously found that PXN variant A127T in lung cancer cells enhanced cell proliferation and focal adhesion formation and colocalized with the anti-apoptotic protein B Cell Lymphoma 2 (BCL-2), which is known to localize to the mitochondria, among other sites. To further explore the effects of activating mutations of PXN on mitochondrial function, we cloned and expressed wild-type PXN and variants containing the most commonly occurring PXN mutations (P46S, P52L, G105D, A127T, P233L, T255I, D399N, E423K, P487L, and K506R) in a GFP-tagged vector using HEK-293 human embryonic kidney cells. Utilizing live-cell imaging to systematically study the effects of wild-type PXN vs. mutants, we created a model that recapitulates the salient features of the measured dynamics and conclude that compared with wild-type, some mutant clones confer enhanced focal adhesion and lamellipodia formation (A127T, P233L, and P487L) and some confer increased association with BCL-2, Dynamin-related Protein-1 (DRP-1), and Mitofusion-2 (MFN-2) proteins (P233L and D399N). Further, PXN mutants, through their interactions with BCL-2 and DRP-1, could regulate cisplatin drug resistance in human lung cancer cells. The data reported herein suggest that mutant PXN variants play a prominent role in mitochondrial dynamics with direct implications on lung cancer progression and hence, deserve further exploration as therapeutic targets.

summary Background: Oral cavity and in particular oral tongue cancers occur with a rising incidence in younger patients often lacking the typical risk factors of tobacco use, alcohol use, and human papilloma virus (HPV) infection. Their prognosis when treated with chemoradiation has not been well studied and responsible risk factors remain elusive. A viral etiology (other than HPV) has been hypothesized. Methods: First we analyzed outcomes from 748 head and neck cancer patients with locoregionally advanced stage tumors treated with curative-intent chemoradiation by anatomic site. Second, we analyzed seven oral tongue (OT) tumors from young, non-smokers/non-drinkers for the presence of viral mRNA using short-read massively-parallel sequencing (RNA-Seq) in combination with a newly-developed digital subtraction method followed by viral screening and discovery algorithms. For positive controls we used an HPV16-positive HNC cell line, a cervical cancer, and an EBV-LMP2A transgene lymphoma. Results: Younger patients with oral cavity tumors had worse outcomes compared to non-oral cavity patients. Surprisingly none of the seven oral tongue cancers showed significant presence of viral transcripts. In positive controls the expected viral material was identified. Conclusion: Oral cavity tumors in younger patients have a poor prognosis and do not appear to be caused by a transcriptionally active oncovirus.

Summary Purpose Current standard therapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is concurrent chemoradiation based on randomized data. However, limited randomized data exist to support the addition of induction chemotherapy (ICT). Methods 58 Patients with NPC were treated from 1990 to 2010. All patients received platinum-based ICT. All 58 patients were treated with chemoradiation, 57 in a week-on/week-off (WOWO) fashion. Concurrent chemotherapy included hydroxyurea/5-fluorouracil for all patients. Median radiation dose was 70 Gy. No patient received adjuvant chemotherapy. Results AJCC 2009 stage was II = 13, III = 21, IVa = 13, and IVb = 11. Median follow-up for surviving patients was 66 months. Response to ICT was complete response (CR) 17% and partial response (PR) 64%. The CR rate after chemoradiation was 96%. Five-year actuarial freedom from local failure (FFLF), freedom from distant failure (FFDF), cause-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS) was 98%, 90%, 90%, and 76%, respectively. Analysis of pediatric patients ( n = 9) demonstrated 5-year actuarial FFLF, FFDF, CSS, and OS of 100%, 88%, 80%, and 80%, respectively. Conclusions ICT followed by concurrent chemoradiation demonstrates excellent FFLF, FFDF, CSS, and OS with tolerable toxicity. Induction chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiation for patients with NPC should be explored further in a randomized setting.

Background AdGV.EGR.TNF.11D (TNFerade™ Biologic) is a replication-deficient adenoviral vector expressing human tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) under the control of the chemoradiation-inducible EGR-1 promoter. TNF-α has been shown to function as a radiation sensitizer. We conducted a phase I dose escalation study to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) of TNFerade™ Biologic, when added to chemoradiotherapy in poor prognosis patients with recurrent, previously irradiated head and neck cancer (HNC). Methods TNFerade™ Biologic was injected intratumorally on day 1 of each 14-day cycle and dose-escalated in log increments from 4 × 109 to 4 × 1011 PU. Daily radiation, infusional 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), and hydroxyurea were given on days 1–5 for seven cycles (FHX). Tumor biopsies were obtained before, during, and after treatment. Results Fourteen patients were treated. DLT was reached at a dose level of 3 (4 × 1011 PU) with three thrombotic events. The response rate was 83.3%. The median survival was 9.6 months. One patient (7.1%) remained alive 3 years after treatment. Biopsies were obtained in 90% of patients. Nearly all tumors expressed adenovirus receptors, TNF-α, and TNF-α receptors. Adenoviral DNA was detected in three biopsies from one patient. Conclusions TNFerade™ Biologic can be safely integrated with FHX chemoradiotherapy at an MTD of 4 × 1010 PU. Monitoring for thrombotic events is indicated.