Search

Clinical trials conducted in various countries indicate that the use of epoetin alfa in patients with nephrogenic anemia in chronic kidney disease can increase the effectiveness of treatment, reduce the incidence of cardiovascular and infectious complications, and reduce mortality in patients with chronic kidney disease.The aim of the article was to conduct a comparative clinical and economic assessment of the treatment costs of nephrogenic anemia in adult dialysis patients with recombinant human erythropoietins: epoetin alfa, darbepoetin and long-acting methoxy polyethylene glycol – epoetin beta.Materials and methods. The study took into account direct medical costs of nephrogenic anemia pharmacotherapy on the basis of 1 year maintenance therapy according to the following scheme: epoetin alfa – 3 times per week, darbepoetin alfa – once per week, methoxy polyethylene glycol – epoetin beta – once per 2 or 4 weeks. A “costs minimization” analysis was performed for equivalent maintenance epoetins doses for intravenous and subcutaneous administrations. Epoetin alpha equivalents were calculated for an average patient weighing 75 kg by converting a weekly dose of short-acting epoetin (7500 IU) into equivalent doses using dose conversion factors.Results. In the hypothetical cohort of patients under study, epoetin alfa, darbepoetin alfa, and methoxy polyethylene glycol – epoetin beta not differ in effectiveness in achieving target Hb values and in safety. With the equal effectiveness of the investigated drugs, in the studied patients, intravenous epoetin alfa can be less expensive drug therapy relative to the equivalent doses obtained by the calculation: darbepoetin by 14–24% and methoxy polyethylene glycol – epoetin beta by 4–30%. The change-over of patients to the subcutaneous administration makes it possible to decline a weekly dose of epoetin alfa by 20–30% by reducing the frequency of taking the drug to twice a week, and to reduce the cost of drug therapy by a third.Conclusion. Intravenous and subcutaneous administrations of epoetin alfa 2500 IU may be a more economical drug therapy in comparison with the equivalent doses of darbepoetin and methoxy polyethylene glycol – epoetin beta.

BackgroundExogenous replacement of erythropoietin (EPO) by recombinant human EPO has been considered a standard of care for the treatment of anemia in patients with chronic kidney disease for more than 20 years. Genetically engineered biologic proteins derived from human, animal, or microorganism sources are a major area of growth in modern medical care, accounting for one-third of new drug approvals in the past decade. Despite benefit to patients, the use of biologics comes at a significant cost, representing one of the fastest growing segments of strained healthcare budgets around the world.SummaryBiosimilars, or biologic drugs that are designed to be highly similar to approved reference biologic drugs, have been available in Europe for more than 10 years with no unusual or unexpected effects compared to their reference biologics whose patents have expired. Given the success of the biosimilar approval pathway pioneered in Europe, it has served as a global reference for other regulatory authorities to establish and implement biosimilar licensure frameworks, including the United States (US), the largest pharmaceutical market in the world. Given 10 of the top 25 drugs sold in 2014 were biologics, and considering the rising costs of healthcare, biosimilars have the potential to become a significant part of the US market. Key Messages: For the nephrology community, the recent patent expiries for epoetin alfa (Epogen®, Amgen and Procrit®, Johnson & Johnson) have created the opportunity to develop biosimilar EPOs. And while no biosimilar in this therapeutic class is approved in the US, there are proposed biosimilars in development.

Background: Anemia is a common comorbidity in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). That affects the vast majority and can have a significant impact on patient morbidity and mortality. Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) are the main lines in management of anemia in hemodialysis patients. Replacement therapy with recombinant human erythropoietin (r- HuEPO) has provided an effective treatment for patients with renal "Epoetin alfa" is a recombinant erythropoietin with the same amino acid sequence as human erythropoietin (EPO). In comparison to epoetin alfa, darbepoetin alfa (DPO) contains an increased amount of sialic acid-containing carbohydrate chains. It shows a much longer elimination half-life than epoetin alfa, with prolonged erythropoietic effect. Aim of the Work: to evaluate whether darbpoetin and epopoetin alpha can be used interchangeably on the same patient, achieving the same desired effect and to detect any difference in the occurrence of side effects between both ESAs. Patient and Methods: This was a crossover study that took place in the Pediatrics Dialysis unit, Children's Hospital, Ain Shams University. The study was conducted on 40 children with end stage renal disease on regular hemodialysis over a period of 6 months. The patients were randomly put into two groups A and B, each group contained 20 patients. Each group received one type of ESA either (darbpoetin alpha or epopoetin alpha)for 3 months and then shifted to the other type of ESA for another 3 months. The dosage of epoetin alfa used was (200IU/kg/week) and a conversion rate of EPO: DPO, 300:1. A period of 6 weeks was agreed as a washout period after the first drug given in both groups in which no results were recorded but ESA was not stopped due to its essentiality. Blood tests (hemoglobin (Hb), serum urea, serum creatinine and iron profile; (S. iron, S. ferritin, TIBC, and transferrin saturation)) were withdrawn at the start and the end of the 3 months' period of each drug. Results: We found no difference on the Hb level with both drugs. The interchange between them did not yield any significant drop in the Hb levels. Hb target in both EPO and DPO was reached in 22.5% of total cases, and was not reached in 62.5%. This proved that both drugs give the same effect with nearly negligible difference. No serious Sside effect as convulsions, hypertension, and thrombosis were noticed in both groups. Conclusion: The target Hb was not reached in most patients of both groups of ESRD on regular hemodialysis at the unit and none of both drugs showed superior results or less side effects than the other. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy of epoetin alfa and darbepoetin alfa in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) in the real-life setting. A total of 204 patients with low-risk or intermediate-1-risk MDS who received epoetin alfa or darbepoetin alfa were included. Hemoglobin levels and transfusion need were recorded before and during 12-month treatment. Hemoglobin levels were significantly higher at each follow up visit when compared to baseline levels in both epoetin alfa (mean ± SD 8.68 ± 1.0 g/dL at baseline vs. 9.83 ± 1.45, 9.99 ± 1.55, 10.24 ± 1.77 and 10.2 ± 1.5 g/dL, respectively) and darbepoetin alfa (8.83 ± 1.09 g/dL at baseline vs. 9.62 ± 1.37, 9.78 ± 1.49, 9.9 ± 1.39 and 10.1 ± 1.5 g/dL, respectively) groups (p < 0.001 for each). Transfusion need significantly decreased from baseline at each study visit in the epoetin alfa group (p < 0.001) and only at the 12th month visit (p < 0.001) in the darbepoetin alfa group. Hemoglobin levels or transfusion need was similar between treatment groups. Overall, 12-month response rate was 58.1% for epoetin alfa and 41.9% for darbepoetin alfa, with no significant difference between treatment groups, whereas higher response rate was noted within the first three months (62.7%) compared to next 9 months (ranged 44.4–60%) of treatment in the epoetin alfa group (p ranged 0.002 to < 0.001). This real-life retrospective study revealed similar efficacy of epoetin alfa and darbepoetin alfa among low risk or intermediate-1 risk MDS patients with no difference in treatment response between treatment groups, whereas a likelihood of earlier treatment response in the epoetin alfa group. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]