151. Effect of sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors on cardiac structure and function in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients with or without chronic heart failure: a meta-analysis
- Author
-
Yi Wen Yu, Yun Hong Wang, Yan Huang, Qiong Zhou, Mei Zhai, Xuemei Zhao, and Jian Zhang
- Subjects
Blood Glucose ,Male ,lcsh:Diseases of the circulatory (Cardiovascular) system ,Time Factors ,Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism ,Review ,030204 cardiovascular system & hematology ,Ventricular Function, Left ,0302 clinical medicine ,Natriuretic Peptide, Brain ,030212 general & internal medicine ,Body surface area ,education.field_of_study ,Ejection fraction ,Ventricular Remodeling ,Middle Aged ,Treatment Outcome ,Cardiology ,End-diastolic volume ,Atrial Function, Left ,Female ,Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine ,Cardiac function curve ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Population ,03 medical and health sciences ,Internal medicine ,Diabetes mellitus ,Type 2 diabetes mellitus ,medicine ,Cardiac remodelling ,Humans ,education ,Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors ,Aged ,Sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors ,Heart Failure ,business.industry ,Stroke Volume ,Atrial Remodeling ,Recovery of Function ,medicine.disease ,Confidence interval ,Chronic heart failure ,Peptide Fragments ,Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 ,lcsh:RC666-701 ,Heart failure ,Chronic Disease ,business ,Biomarkers - Abstract
Background Although the benefits of sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) on cardiovascular events have been reported in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) with or without heart failure (HF), the impact of SGLT2i on cardiac remodelling remains to be established. Methods We searched the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library and Web of Science databases up to November 16th, 2020, for randomized controlled trials reporting the effects of SGLT2i on parameters of cardiac structure, cardiac function, plasma N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) level or the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) score in T2DM patients with or without chronic HF. The effect size was expressed as the mean difference (MD) or standardized mean difference (SMD) and its 95% confidence interval (CI). Subgroup analyses were performed based on the stage A–B or stage C HF population and HF types. Results Compared to placebo or other antidiabetic drugs, SGLT2i showed no significant effects on left ventricular mass index, left ventricular end diastolic volume index, left ventricular end systolic volume index, or left atrial volume index. SGLT2i improved left ventricular ejection fraction only in the subgroup of HF patients with reduced ejection fraction (MD 3.16%, 95% CI 0.11 to 6.22, p = 0.04; I2 = 0%), and did not affect the global longitudinal strain in the overall analysis including stage A–B HF patients. SGLT2i showed benefits in the E/e’ ratio (MD − 0.45, 95% CI − 0.88 to − 0.03, p = 0.04; I2 = 0%), plasma NT-proBNP level (SMD − 0.09, 95% CI − 0.16 to − 0.03, p = 0.004; I2 = 0%), and the KCCQ score (SMD 3.12, 95% CI 0.76 to 5.47, p = 0.01; I2 = 0%) in the overall population. Conclusion The use of SGLT2i was associated with significant improvements in cardiac diastolic function, plasma NT-proBNP level, and the KCCQ score in T2DM patients with or without chronic HF, but did not significantly affect cardiac structural parameters indexed by body surface area. The LVEF level was improved only in HF patients with reduced ejection fraction.
- Published
- 2021