Search

Cystic fibrosis is a common genetically inherited, multisystem disorder caused by loss of function of the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) protein, an apically situated anion channel. In the lung, lack of CFTR leads to airway surface dehydration, mucociliary clearance failure and an acidic pH in which innate defence molecules are rendered ineffective. Infection occurs early in life, with P. aeruginosa dominating by adolescence. The characteristic features of the CF airway highlighted above encourage persistence of infection, but P. aeruginosa also possess an array of mechanisms with which they attack host defences and render themselves protected from antimicrobials. Early eradication is usually successful, but this is usually transient. Chronic infection is manifest by biofilm formation which is resistant to treatment. Outcomes for people with CF have improved greatly in the last few decades, but particularly so with the recent advent of small molecule CFTR modulators. However, despite impressive efficacy on lung function and exacerbation frequency, most people with chronic infection remain with their pathogens. There is an active pipeline of new treatments including anti-biofilm and anti-quorum sensing molecules and non-drug approaches such as bacteriophage. Studies are reviewed and challenges for future drug development considered., (© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.)

Background: CF is traditionally assessed in clinic. It is unclear if home monitoring of young people with CF is feasible or acceptable. The COVID-19 pandemic has made home monitoring more of a necessity. We report the results of CLIMB-CF, exploring home monitoring's feasibility and potential obstacles., Methods: We designed a mobile app and enrolled participants with CF aged 2-17 years and their parents for six months. They were asked to complete a variety of measures either daily or twice a week. During the study, participants and their parents completed questionnaires exploring depression, anxiety and quality of life. At the end of the study parents and participants completed acceptability questionnaires., Results: 148 participants were recruited, 4 withdrew prior to starting the study. 82 participants were female with median (IQR) age 7.9 (5.2-12 years). Median data completeness was 40.1% (13.6-69.9%) for the whole cohort; when assessed by age participants aged ≥ 12 years contributed significantly less (15.6% [9.8-30%]). Data completeness decreased over time. There was no significant difference between parental depression and anxiety scores at the start and the end of the study nor in CFQ-R respiratory domain scores for participants ≥ 14 years. The majority of participants did not feel the introduction of home monitoring impacted their daily lives., Conclusions: Most participants felt home monitoring did not negatively impact their lives and it did not increase depression, anxiety or decrease quality of life. However, uptake was variable, and not well sustained. The teenage years pose a particular challenge and further work is required., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest No declarations of interested related to this paper DMC reports not related to this work honorarium from Vertex pharmaceuticals JM reports not related to this work participation on advisory boards for Vertex pharmaceuticals MB reports not related to this work Investigator led research grants from Pfizer and Roche Diagnostics. Institutional fees from Roche Diagnostics and TEVA. Travel expenses from Boehringer Ingelheim and Vertex pharmaceuticals. JCD reports not related to this work institutional fees from Vertex pharmaceuticals, AbbVie, Boehringer Inglehaim, Arcturus Therapeutics, Algipharma. Individual fees Eloxx Pharmaceuticals and Gilead Science inc., (Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Background: Pseudomonas aeruginosa (Pa) and Aspergillus species (Asp) are the most common bacterial and fungal organisms respectively in CF airways. Our aim was to examine impacts of Asp infection and Pa/Asp co-infection., Methods: Patients on the UK CF Registry in 2016 were grouped into: absent (Pa-), intermittent (Pai) or chronic Pa (Pac), each with Asp positive (Asp+) or negative (Asp-). Primary outcome was best percentage predicted FEV 1 (ppFEV 1 ) that year. Secondary outcomes were intravenous (IV) antibiotic courses, growth (height, weight, BMI) and additional disease complications. Associations between outcomes and infection-status were assessed using regression models adjusting for significant confounders (age, sex, Phe508del homozygosity and CF-related diabetes (CFRD))., Results: 9,270 patients were included (median age 19 [IQR 9-30] years, 54% male, 50% Phe508del/F508del). 4,142 patients (45%) isolated Pa, 1,460 (16%) Asp. Pa-/Asp+ subjects had an adjusted ppFEV 1 that was 5.9% lower than Pa-/Asp- (p < 0.0001). In patients with Pai or Pac, there was no additional impact of Asp on ppFEV 1 . However, there was a higher probability that Pac/Asp+ patients had required IV antibiotics than Pac/Asp- group (OR 1.23 [1.03-1.48]). Low BMI, ABPA, CF-liver disease and CFRD were all more frequent with Asp alone than Pa-/Asp-, though not more common in Pac/Asp+ than Pac/Asp-., Conclusions: Co-infection with Pa and Asp was not associated with reduced lung function compared with Pa alone, but was associated with additional use of IV antibiotics. Asp infection itself is associated with several important indicators of disease severity. Longitudinal analyses should explore the impact of co-infection on disease progression., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest No., (Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Objectives/hypothesis: Despite considerable effort being dedicated to contouring reconstruction plates, there remains limited evidence demonstrating an association between contour and reconstructive outcomes. We sought to evaluate whether optimizing mandibular reconstruction plate contouring is associated with reduced postoperative hardware complications., Study Design: Retrospective cohort study., Methods: A cohort study was performed with adult patients (age ≥18 years) who underwent mandibulectomy and osseous free flap reconstruction following oncologic ablation at the University Health Network in Toronto, Canada, between January 1, 2003 and December 31, 2014. Patients with computed tomography scans performed within 1 year of reconstruction were included. Computer-based three-dimensional models were generated and used to calculate the mean plate-to-bone gap (mm). The primary outcome was plate exposure. Secondary outcome included a composite of plate exposure or intraoral dehiscence. Logistic regression models were fitted for each outcome accounting for other patient and surgical characteristics associated with the primary outcome., Results: Ninety-four patients met inclusion criteria, with a mean age of 60.4 (standard deviation [SD] 14.9). The mean follow-up time was 31.4 months (range 3-94). Reconstruction was performed with fibular (57%) and scapular free flaps (43%). In the multivariable model, small mean plate-to-bone gap (<1 mm) was independently associated with 86% reduced odds of plate exposure (odds ratio [OR] 0.12; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.02-0.55). Mean plate-to-bone gap less than 1 mm was also independently associated with reduced odds of developing a composite of plate exposure or intraoral dehiscence (OR, 0.29; 95%CI, 0.11-0.75)., Conclusion: Optimizing plate contouring during mandibular reconstruction may decrease the development of postoperative hardware complications., Level of Evidence: 4 Laryngoscope, 132:61-66, 2022., (© 2021 The American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society, Inc.)

Background: Adding a slow vital capacity (SVC) to multiple breath washout (MBW) allows quantification of otherwise overlooked signal from under/un-ventilated lung units (UVLU) and may provide a more comprehensive assessment of airway disease than conventional lung clearance index (LCI 2.5 )., Methods: We conducted a pilot study on people undergoing MBW tests: 10 healthy controls (HC) and 43 cystic fibrosis (CF) subjects performed an SVC after the standard end of test. We term the new outcome LCI with Short extension (LCI ShX ). We assessed (i) CF/ HC differences, (ii) variability (iii) effect of pulmonary exacerbation (PEx)/treatment and (iv) relationship with CF computed tomography (CFCT) scores., Results: HC/ CF group differences were larger with LCI ShX than LCI 2.5 (P<0.001). Within the CF group UVLU was highly variable and when abnormal it did not correlate with corresponding LCI 2.5 . Signal showed little variability during clinical stability (n = 11 CF; 2 visits; median inter-test variability 2.6% LCI ShX, 2.5% LCI 2.5 ). PEx signal was significantly greater for LCI ShX both for onset and resolution. Both MBW parameters correlated significantly with total lung CT scores and hyperinflation but only LCI ShX correlated with mucus plugging., Conclusions: UVLU captured within the LCI ShX varies between individuals; the lack of relationship with LCI 2.5 demonstrates that new, additional information is being captured. LCI ShX repeatability during clinical stability combined with its larger signal around episodes of PEx may lend it superior sensitivity as an outcome measure. Further studies will build on this pilot data to fully establish its utility in monitoring disease status., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest Christopher Short, Clare Saunders, Dominic Hughes, Samantha Irving, Laura Gardener, Mark Rosenthal and Paul Robinson report no conflicts of interest. Thomas Semple reports speakers fees - Vertex Pharmaceuticals. Research grants – Chiesi Pharmaceuticals. Consultancy fees - Boehringer-Ingelheim and Calyx. Prof. Jane Davies has performed clinical trial leadership roles, educational and/ or advisory activities for the following: Abbvie, Algipharma AS, Bayer AG, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co. KG, Eloxx, Enterprise, Galapagos NV, ImevaX GmbH, Ionis, Nivalis Therapeutics, Inc., Novartis, ProQR Therapeutics III B.V., Proteostasis Therapeutics, INC., Pulmocide Raptor Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Vertex Pharmaceuticals., (Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Background: Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PA) is an important respiratory pathogen for cystic fibrosis (CF) patients. Routine microbiology surveillance is time-consuming, and is best performed on expectorated sputum. As alternative, volatile organic compounds (VOCs) may be indicative of PA colonisation. In this study, we aimed to identify VOCs associated with PA in literature and perform targeted exhaled breath analysis to recognize PA positive CF patients non-invasively., Methods: This study consisted of 1) a literature review to select VOCs of interest, and 2) a cross-sectional CF study. Definitions used: A) PA positive, PA culture at visit/chronically; B) PA free, no PA culture in ≥12 months. Exhaled VOCs were identified via quadrupole MS. The primary endpoint was the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUROCC) of individual VOCs as well as combined VOCs against PA culture., Results: 241 VOCs were identified in literature, of which 56 were further evaluated, and 13 could be detected in exhaled breath in our cohort. Exhaled breath of 25 pediatric and 28 adult CF patients, PA positive (n=16) and free (n=28) was available. 3/13 VOCs were significantly (p<0.05) different between PA groups in children; none were in adults. Notably, a composite model based on 5 or 1 VOC(s) showed an AUROCC of 0.86 (CI 0.71-1.0) and 0.87 (CI 0.72-1.0) for adults and children, respectively., Conclusions: Targeted VOC analysis appears to discriminate children and adults with and without PA positive cultures with clinically acceptable sensitivity values., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interests AHM and PB are supported by an innovation grant from Vertex Pharmaceuticals B.V. PJS is scientific advisor and has a formally inconsiderable interest in the SME Breathomix AHM reports grants and personal fees from GSK, Boehringer Ingelheim, and AstraZeneca, and grants from Chiesi, outside the submitted work., (Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Background: Airway clearance techniques (ACTs) are integral to cystic fibrosis (CF) management. However, there is no consensus as to which outcome measures (OMs) are best for assessing ACT efficacy., Objectives: To summarise OMs that have been assessed for their clinimetric properties (including validity, feasibility, reliability, and reproducibility) within the context of ACT research in CF., Design and Methods: A systematic review was conducted according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA) standards. Any parallel or cross-over randomised controlled trial (RCT) investigating outcome measures for ACT in the CF population were eligible for inclusion. The search was performed in five medical databases, clinicaltrials.gov, and abstracts from international CF conferences. The authors planned to independently assess study quality and risk of bias using the CO nsensus-based S tandards for the selection of health status M easurement I nstrume N ts (COSMIN) risk of bias checklist with external validity assessment based upon study details (participants and study intervention). Two review authors (GS and MJ) independently screened search results against inclusion criteria, and further data extraction were planned but not required., Results: No completed RCTs from the 187 studies identified met inclusion criteria for the primary or post hoc secondary objective. Two ongoing trials were identified., Discussion and Conclusion: This empty systematic review highlights that high-quality RCTs are urgently needed to investigate and validate the clinimetric properties of OMs used to assess ACT efficacy. With the changing demographics of CF combined with the introduction of cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) modulator therapies, an accurate assessment of the current benefit of ACT or the effect of ACT withdrawal is a high priority for clinical practice and future research; OMs which have been validated for this purpose are essential., Registration: This systematic review was registered on the PROSPERO database (CRD42020206033).

Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Prof. Jane Davies has performed clinical trial leadership roles, educational and/ or advisory activities for the following: Abbvie, Algipharma AS, Bayer AG, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co. KG, Eloxx, Enterprise, Galapagos NV, ImevaX GmbH, Ionis, Nivalis Therapeutics, Inc., Novartis, ProQR Therapeutics III B.V., Proteostasis Therapeutics, INC., Pulmocide Raptor Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Vertex Pharmaceuticals.

Structural and functional defects within the lungs of children with cystic fibrosis (CF) are detectable soon after birth and progress throughout preschool years often without overt clinical signs or symptoms. By school age, most children have structural changes such as bronchiectasis or gas trapping/hypoperfusion and lung function abnormalities that persist into later life. Despite improved survival, gains in forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV 1 ) achieved across successive birth cohorts during childhood have plateaued, and rates of FEV 1 decline in adolescence and adulthood have not slowed. This suggests that interventions aimed at preventing lung disease should be targeted to mild disease and commence in early life. Spirometry-based classifications of 'normal' (FEV 1 ≥90% predicted) and 'mild lung disease' (FEV 1 70%-89% predicted) are inappropriate, given the failure of spirometry to detect significant structural or functional abnormalities shown by more sensitive imaging and lung function techniques. The state and readiness of two imaging (CT and MRI) and two functional (multiple breath washout and oscillometry) tools for the detection and monitoring of early lung disease in children and adults with CF are discussed in this article.Prospective research programmes and technological advances in these techniques mean that well-designed interventional trials in early lung disease, particularly in young children and infants, are possible. Age appropriate, randomised controlled trials are critical to determine the safety, efficacy and best use of new therapies in young children. Regulatory bodies continue to approve medications in young children based on safety data alone and extrapolation of efficacy results from older age groups. Harnessing the complementary information from structural and functional tools, with measures of inflammation and infection, will significantly advance our understanding of early CF lung disease pathophysiology and responses to therapy. Defining clinical utility for these novel techniques will require effective collaboration across multiple disciplines to address important remaining research questions. Future impact on existing management burden for patients with CF and their family must be considered, assessed and minimised.To address the possible role of these techniques in early lung disease, a meeting of international leaders and experts in the field was convened in August 2019 at the Australiasian Cystic Fibrosis Conference. The meeting entitiled 'Shaping imaging and functional testing for early disease detection of lung disease in Cystic Fibrosis', was attended by representatives across the range of disciplines involved in modern CF care. This document summarises the proceedings, key priorities and important research questions highlighted., Competing Interests: Competing interests: TR reports personal fees from Vertex Pharmaceuticals during the conduct of the study; in addition, TR has a patent PCT/AU2016/000079 issued. JCD reports others from Algipharma AS, Bayer AG, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co. KG, Galapagos NV, ImevaX GmbH, Nivalis Therapeutics, Inc., ProQR Therapeutics III B.V., Proteostasis Therapeutics, Inc., Raptor Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Vertex Pharmaceuticals (Europe) Limited, Enterprise, Novartis, Pulmocide and Flatley; grants from CF Trust; and others from Teva, outside the submitted work. JSE reports grants from Ionis and the European Commission; personal fees and others from Vertex, during the conduct of the study. MM reports grants from the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research and Einstein Foundation Berlin, during the conduct of the study; personal fees and others from Boehringer Ingelheim and Vertex Pharmaceuticals; personal fees from Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Santhera, Galapagos, Sterna Biologicals, Enterprise Therapeutics and Antabio, outside the submitted work. FR reports non-financial support from Vertex during the conduct of the study and acts as a consultant to Vertex Pharmaceuticals, who was the sponsor of this meeting. ARS reports grants from Vertex and personal fees from Novartis, Teva and Vertex, outside the submitted work; and patent issued: 'Alkyl quinolones as biomarkers of Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection and uses thereof'. SS reports a patent licensed to Thirona, and a patent licensed to Resonance Health Ltd and Institutional reimbursement from Vertex Pharmaceuticals (Australia) Pty Ltd. for Steering Committee Member duties organising SHIFT at the Australasian Cystic Fibrosis Conference 2019, Perth. CEW reports institutional reimbursement from Vertex Pharmaceuticals (Australia) P/L for Steering Committee Member duties organising SHIFT at the Australasian Cystic Fibrosis Conference 2019, Perth; income on a per patient basis derived from Pharmaceutical Studies - Vertex Pharmaceuticals Inc., and Boehringer-Ingelheim; research grant from Novo Nordisk Pharmaceuticals P/L- CF-IDEA Study; other reimbursements from Vertex Pharmaceuticals P/L honorarium to attend CF International Advisory Board Meeting in February 2014, Vertex Pharmaceuticals P/L honorarium to attend CF Medical Advisory Board Meeting in Adelaide in April 2014, Novartis Pharmaceuticals P/L honorarium to present symposium at National Pediatric Congress in Lebanon in May 2014, European CF Conference in Gothenburg June 2014 Vertex Pharmaceuticals P/L return travel and honorarium for lecture and discussions, North American CF Conference Georgia October 2014 DKBmed, LLC honorarium to present symposium, Vertex Pharmaceuticals P/L honorarium to present as speaker in an educational meeting series in Brisbane and Sydney in April 2015, Vertex Pharmaceuticals P/L honorarium to attend the Vertex Steering Committee Meetings re VX15-770-123 Study in 2014, Vertex Pharmaceuticals P/L honorarium for Vertex Medical Advisory Board- Innovative endpoints in CF in August 2015, The University of Miami honorarium for meeting attendance in 2015, Thorax honorarium for associate editor duties Q3/Q4 2015, BMJ honorarium for work as reviewer, Vertex Pharmaceuticals 2015 Chicago return flight and accommodation as investigator in Lumacaftor study, Vertex Pharmaceuticals 2015–2017 honorarium as speaker at Vertex sponsored educational meeting series in Australia, Vertex Pharmaceuticals 2016 Phoenix return flight and accommodation as investigator in Next Gen study, Vertex Pharmaceuticals December 2016 honoraria as speaker at Vertex sponsored educational meeting in Liverpool, UK DKBmed eCF Review Issue honoraria in January 2017, Vertex Pharmaceuticals–March 2017 honoraria as speaker at TSANZ meeting Vertex Pharmaceuticals Inc. 2014–2018, honorarium for acting as consultant on the Vertex Orkambi 6-11 HTA Advisory Board, the Global Pediatric Advisory Committee, the Global Medical Advisory Board, and the VIA Grants Committee; Gilead Sciences Ltd. honorarium for meeting attendance on CF imaging; Honorarium for In Vivo Academy Limited for webcast meeting attendance at ECFC–2018; Vertex Pharmaceuticals P/L honorarium to present as speaker in an educational meeting at ECFC in Belgrade–2018; Vertex Pharmaceuticals Inc. honorarium to attend Next Gen Early Lifecycle Management Plan–London–2018; Vertex Pharmaceuticals P/L to act as consultant and to render such services in the form of documents, advice, meetings and conferences during the period October 2018; present Vertex Pharmaceuticals P/L to attend the EU Real World Evidence Steering Committee in Amsterdam–2019 Current Board Positions–International Advisory Board Vertex Pharmaceuticals P/L Deputy Editor Thorax /Associate Editor Respirology. PDR reports institutional reimbursement from Vertex Pharmaceuticals (Australia) Pty. Ltd for Steering Committee Member duties organising SHIFT at the Australasian Cystic Fibrosis Conference 2019, Perth., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Importance: Pharyngocutaneous fistula (PCF) results in an inflammatory reaction, but its association with the rate of locoregional and distant control, disease-free survival, and overall survival in laryngeal cancer remains uncertain., Objective: To determine if pharyngocutaneous fistula after salvage laryngectomy is associated with locoregional and distant control, disease-free survival, and/or overall survival., Design, Setting, and Participants: A multicenter collaborative retrospective cohort study conducted at 5 centers in Canada and the US of 550 patients who underwent salvage laryngectomy for recurrent laryngeal cancer from January 1, 2000, to December 31, 2014. The median follow-up time was 5.7 years (range, 0-18 years)., Main Outcomes and Measures: Outcomes examined included locoregional and distant control, disease-free survival, and overall survival. Fine and Gray competing risk regression and Cox-proportional hazard regression models were used for outcomes. Competing risks and the Kaplan-Meier methods were used to estimate outcomes at 3 years and 5 years., Results: In all, 550 patients (mean [SD] age, 64 [10.4] years; men, 465 [85%]) met inclusion criteria. Pharyngocutaneous fistula occurred in 127 patients (23%). The difference in locoregional control between the group of patients with PCF (75%) and the non-PCF (72%) group was 3% (95% CI, -6% to 12%). The difference in overall survival between the group with PCF (44%) and the non-PCF group (52%) was 8% (95% CI, -2% to 20%). The difference in disease-free survival between PCF and non-PCF groups was 6% (95% CI, -4% to 16%). In the multivariable model, patients with PCF were at a 2-fold higher rate of distant metastases (hazard ratio, 2.00; 95% CI, 1.22 to 3.27). Distant control was reduced in those with PCF, a 13% (95% CI, 3% to 21%) difference in 5-year distant control., Conclusions and Relevance: This multicenter retrospective cohort study found that development of PCF after salvage laryngectomy is associated with an increased risk for the development of distant metastases.

Objectives: To investigate the population pharmacokinetics of posaconazole gastroresistant tablets in children with cystic fibrosis (CF) and perform simulations to recommend optimal doses., Patients and Methods: Children from a paediatric CF centre who had received posaconazole tablets and underwent therapeutic drug monitoring were identified from pharmacy records. Relevant clinical data were collated from case notes and electronic patient records and used to develop an allometrically scaled population pharmacokinetic model. A stepwise covariate model-building exercise evaluated the influence of interacting medicines and liver function., Results: One hundred posaconazole serum concentrations were collected from 37 children with a median age of 14 years (range 7-17). Posaconazole pharmacokinetics were adequately described by a one-compartment model with inter-individual variability on clearance. Dose simulations demonstrated a 77%-83% probability of attaining a trough target of 1 mg/L with a dose of 300 mg every 12 h for two doses then 300 mg once daily (OD) in children aged 6-11 years; and 86%-88% with a dose of 400 mg every 12 h for two doses then 400 mg OD in adolescents aged 12-17 years. This dose scheme also yielded a 90% probability of achieving an AUC of 30 mg·h/L. AUC and trough concentration were highly correlated (r2 = 0.98). Simulations showed that trough concentrations of >0.75 mg/L would exceed an AUC of 30 mg·h/L in 90% of patients., Conclusions: A starting dose of 300 mg OD in those aged 6-11 years and 400 mg OD in those aged 12-17 years (following loading doses) yields a 90% probability of attaining an AUC of 30 mg·h/L., (© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy.)

Background: Riociguat is a first-in-class soluble guanylate cyclase stimulator for which preclinical data suggested improvements in cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) function., Methods: This international, multicenter, two-part, Phase II study of riociguat enrolled adults with cystic fibrosis (CF) homozygous for Phe508del CFTR. Part 1 was a 28-day, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in participants not receiving CFTR modulator therapy. Twenty-one participants were randomized 1:2 to placebo or oral riociguat (0.5 mg three times daily [tid] for 14 days, increased to 1.0 mg tid for the subsequent 14 days). The primary and secondary efficacy endpoints were change in sweat chloride concentration and percent predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 second (ppFEV 1 ), respectively, from baseline to Day 14 and Day 28 with riociguat compared with placebo., Results: Riociguat did not alter CFTR activity (change in sweat chloride) or lung function (change in ppFEV 1 ) at doses up to 1.0 mg tid after 28 days. The most common drug-related adverse event (AE) was headache occurring in three participants (21%); serious AEs occurred in one participant receiving riociguat (7%) and one participant receiving placebo (14%). This safety profile was consistent with the underlying disease and the known safety of riociguat for its approved indications., Conclusions: The Rio-CF study was terminated due to lack of efficacy and the changing landscape of CF therapeutic development. The current study⁠, within its limits of a small sample size, did not provide evidence that riociguat could be a valid treatment option for CF., Clinical Trial Registration Number: NCT02170025., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest N. Derichs received a speaker honorarium from Vertex Pharmaceuticals, Inc. for participation in a symposium, and served as a consultant for Vertex Pharmaceuticals, Inc. at educational activities and advisory boards. J.L. Taylor-Cousar reports grants paid to her institution from the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation; grants paid to her institution and consulting and speaking fees from Vertex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; grants paid to her institution from Bayer; grants, consulting, and speaking fees from Celtaxys; grants paid to her institution and consulting fees from Proteostasis Therapeutics, Inc.; consulting fees from Santhera, 4DMT, AbbVie, and Polarean; and grants paid to her institution from Eloxx Pharmaceuticals. J.C. Davies reports grants from the CF Trust and other funding from Algipharma AS, Bayer AG, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co. KG, Galapagos NV, ImevaX GmbH, Nivalis Therapeutics, Inc., ProQR Therapeutics III B.V., Proteostasis Therapeutics, Inc., Raptor Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Vertex Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Enterprise, Novartis, Pulmocide, Flatley, Nivalis Therapeutics, Inc., and Teva. I. Fajac received speaker honoraria from Vertex Pharmaceuticals, Inc. for participation in symposia and served as a consultant for Novartis, Proteostasis Therapeutics, Inc., and Vertex Pharmaceuticals, Inc. E. Tullis reports grants paid to her institution from Vertex Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Proteostasis Therapeutics, Bayer AG, Boehringer Ingelheim, AbbVie, Celtaxis, Corbus, and Spyryx, and consultancy fees and honoraria from Vertex Pharmaceuticals, Proteostasis Therapeutics, Astra Zeneca and Horizon. D. Nazareth has nothing to disclose. D.G. Downey reports grants from Vertex Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Proteostasis Therapeutics, Inc., Gilead, and Chiesi; and honoraria or speaker fees from Vertex Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Proteostasis Therapeutics, Inc., and Chiesi. D. Rosenbluth has nothing to disclose. A. Malfroot has nothing to disclose. C. Saunders has nothing to disclose. R. Jensen has nothing to disclose. G.M. Solomon reports work on advisory boards for Bayer and Electromed. F. Vermeulen has nothing to disclose. A. Kaiser is an employee of Bayer AG. S. Willmann is an employee of Bayer AG. S. Saleh is an employee of Bayer AG. K. Droebner is an employee of Bayer AG. P. Sandner is an employee of Bayer AG. C.E. Bear has nothing to disclose. A. Hoffmann is an employee of Bayer AG. F. Ratjen reports other consultancy fees from Vertex Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Bayer, Talecris, CSL Behring, Roche, and Gilead; grants and consultancy from Novartis; and developed speaker bureau for Genentech outside the submitted work. S.M. Rowe reports grants and consulting fees from Arrowhead, Bayer, Celtaxsys, Galapagos/AbbVie, Novartis, Renovion, Synedgen/Synspira, andVertex Pharmaceuticals Inc.; consulting fees from Arcturus, and Cysteic Medicines; and grants from AstraZeneca, Eloxx, N30 Pharmaceuticals, PTC Therapeutics, Translate Bio, and Proteostasis Therapeutics, Inc., (Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Background: Trial participation can allow people with CF early access to CFTR modulator therapies, with high potential for clinical benefit. Therefore, the number of people wishing to participate can substantially exceed the number of slots available. We aimed to understand how the CF community thinks slots to competitive trials should be allocated across the UK and whether this should be driven by clinical need, patients' engagement/adherence or be random. For the latter, we explored site-level versus registry-based, national randomisation processes., Methods: We developed an online survey, recruiting UK-based stakeholders through social media, newsletters and personal contacts. Closed questions were analysed for frequencies and percentages of responses. Free-text questions were analysed using thematic analysis., Results: We received 203 eligible responses. Overall, 75% of stakeholders favoured allocation of slots to individual sites based on patient population size, although pharma favoured allocation based on previous metrics. Currently, few centres have defined strategies for allocating slots locally. At face-value, stakeholders believe all eligible participants should have an equal chance of getting a slot. However, further questioning reveals preference for prioritisation strategies, primarily perceived treatment adherence, although healthcare professionals were less likely to favour this strategy than other stakeholder groups. The majority of stakeholders would prefer to allocate slots and participate in trials locally but 80% said if necessary, they would engage in a system of national allocation., Conclusions: Fair allocation to highly competitive trials does not appear to have a universally acceptable solution. Therefore, transparency and empathy remain critical to negotiate this uncertain territory., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest RD, KP, LA, RB and KB have no conflicts to declare. GD reports personal fees from Chiesi Limited, outside the submitted work. SC reports personal fees from Chiesi Pharmaceuticals, personal fees and non-financial support from Vertex, personal fees from Zambon and personal fees from Insmed, outside the submitted work. NJS has participated in advisory boards for Vertex, Chiesi, Pulmocide and Roche. He has received payments for speaking engagements from Vertex, Gilead, Chiesi, Teva and Zambon. JCD has served on advisory boards and participated in clinical trial leadership, educational activities and grant review board activities for a number of pharma companies active in CF clinical trials: Vertex, PTI, Galapagos, AbbVie, AlgiPharma, Chiesi, Enterprise, Teva, Ionis, Eloxx, Roche, Gilead., (Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Background: Impaired alveolar fluid clearance, determined in part by alveolar sodium transport, is associated with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Nasal sodium transport may reflect alveolar transport. The primary objective of this prospective, observational study was to determine if reduced nasal sodium transport, as measured by nasal potential difference (NPD), was predictive of the development of and outcome from ARDS., Methods: NPD was measured in 15 healthy controls and in 88 patients: 40 mechanically ventilated patients defined as 'at-risk' for ARDS, 61 mechanically ventilated patients with ARDS (13 who were previously included in the 'at-risk' group) and 8 ARDS survivors on the ward., Results: In at-risk subjects, maximum NPD (mNPD) was greater in those who developed ARDS (difference -8.4 mV; 95% CI -13.8 to -3.7; p=0.005) and increased mNPD predicted the development of ARDS before its onset (area under the curve (AUC) 0.75; 95% CI 0.59 to 0.89). In the ARDS group, mNPD was not significantly different for survivors and non-survivors (p=0.076), and mNPD was a modest predictor of death (AUC 0.60; 95% CI 0.45 to 0.75). mNPD was greater in subjects with ARDS (-30.8 mV) than in at-risk subjects (-24.2 mV) and controls (-19.9 mV) (p<0.001). NPD values were not significantly different for survivors and controls (p=0.18)., Conclusions: Increased NPD predicts the development of ARDS in at-risk subjects but does not predict mortality. NPD increases before ARDS develops, is greater during ARDS, but is not significantly different for controls and survivors. These results may reflect the upregulated sodium transport necessary for alveolar fluid clearance in ARDS. NPD may be useful as a biomarker of endogenous mechanisms to stimulate sodium transport. Larger studies are now needed to confirm these associations and predictive performance., Competing Interests: Competing interests: Outside the submitted work, MAM reports grants from Roche/Genentech, personal fees from Novartis Pharmaceuticals, personal fees from Pliant Therapeutics, personal fees from Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceuticals, grants from Quantum Leap Health Organization, personal fees from Citius Pharmaceuticals, grants from the California Institute of Regenerative Medicine, grants from the Department of Defense, and grants from NHLBI. CSC reports grants from NIH. Outside the submitted work, she reports grants and personal fees from Roche/Genentech, grants and personal fees from Bayer, personal fees from Quark Pharmaceuticals, personal fees from Prometic, personal fees from Gen1e Life Sciences, personal fees from Vasomune, and grants from Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative. Outside the submitted work, DFMcA reports personal fees from consultancy for GlaxoSmithKline, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bayer, Novartis and Eli Lilly, and from sitting on a DMEC for a trial undertaken by Vir Biotechnology. In addition, his institution has received funds from grants from the NIHR, Wellcome Trust, Innovate-UK and others. In addition, DFMcA has a patent issued to his institution for a treatment for ARDS. DFMcA is a Director of Research for the Intensive Care Society and NIHR EME Programme Director. His spouse has received personal fees from the California Institute for Regenerative Medicine outside the submitted work., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Background: Making trials more patient-centred improves recruitment and retention, patient satisfaction and makes research accessible to a more representative population. We aimed to understand the factors that influence participation and engagement in clinical trials in cystic fibrosis (CF) trials to guide the rational design and delivery of patient-centred trials., Methods: We used a Delphi process, supported by extensive literature review and 3 workshops, to determine which factors stakeholders think exert significant influence in participation and engagement in CF trials. Panellists were recruited from across the UK and the study was administered online., Results: We had representation from 19 CF centres; 28 people with CF (pwCF), 26 parents and 30 healthcare professionals (HCPs). Panels were presented with a shortlist of 104 factors and asked which they thought influence participation and engagement in CF trials. After 3 iterations, 43 statements met consensus for pwCF, 48 for the parents and 69 for the HCPs., Conclusions: We identified many targets to make trials more patient-centred. Whilst some require an overhaul of trial delivery, many are relatively easy to implement. We outline a list of 'dos and don'ts' for sponsors and research teams including: focus on good communication; recognise that lack of time is the greatest barrier to trial participation so minimise the frequency and length of visits; help participants fit trials around busy lives; remember trial participation can be a major life-event and support participants accordingly; and don't underestimate the impact of simple strategies e.g. on-site access to Wifi and cups of tea., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest RD, LA, MB, SG, FK, SM, TP and CS have no conflicts to declare. JSE has provided consultancy and advice for Vertex, Celtaxsys, Corbus, Ionis in clinical trial design and delivery. He also holds an EU Innovative medicines Initiative grant with Novartis, Polyphor and Alaxia JCD has served on advisory boards and participated in clinical trial leadership, educational activities and grant review board activities for a number of pharma companies active in CF clinical trials: Vertex, PTI, Galapagos, AbbVie, AlgiPharma, Chiesi, Enterprise, Teva, Ionis, Eloxx, Roche, Gilead., (Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

A recent workshop titled "Developing Models to Study Polymicrobial Infections," sponsored by the Dartmouth Cystic Fibrosis Center (DartCF), explored the development of new models to study the polymicrobial infections associated with the airways of persons with cystic fibrosis (CF). The workshop gathered 35+ investigators over two virtual sessions. Here, we present the findings of this workshop, summarize some of the challenges involved with developing such models, and suggest three frameworks to tackle this complex problem. The frameworks proposed here, we believe, could be generally useful in developing new model systems for other infectious diseases. Developing and validating new approaches to study the complex polymicrobial communities in the CF airway could open windows to new therapeutics to treat these recalcitrant infections, as well as uncovering organizing principles applicable to chronic polymicrobial infections more generally.

Over the past two decades there has been considerable progress with the evaluation and management of infants with an inconclusive diagnosis following Newborn Screening (NBS) for cystic Fibrosis (CF). In addition, we have an increasing amount of evidence on which to base guidance on the management of these infants and, importantly, we have a consistent designation being used across the globe of CRMS/CFSPID. There is still work to be undertaken and research questions to answer, but these infants now receive more consistent and appropriate care pathways than previously. It is clear that the majority of these infants remain healthy, do not convert to a diagnosis of CF in childhood, and advice on management should reflect this. However, it is also clear that some will convert to a CF diagnosis and monitoring of these infants should facilitate their early recognition. Those infants that do not convert to a CF diagnosis have some potential of developing a CFTR-RD later in life. At present, it is not possible to quantify this risk, but families need to be provided with clear information of what to look out for. This paper contains a number of changes from previous guidance in light of developing evidence, but the major change is the recommendation of a detailed assessment of the child with CRMS/CFSPID in the sixth year of age, including respiratory function assessment and imaging. With these data, the CF team can discuss future care arrangements with the family and come to a shared decision on the best way forward, which may include discharge to primary care with appropriate information. Information is key for these families, and we recommend consideration of a further appointment when the individual is a young adult to directly communicate the implications of the CRMS/CFSPID designation., (Copyright © 2020 European Cystic Fibrosis Society. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: ∼30% of patients with SLE develop LN. Presence and/or severity of LN are currently assessed by renal biopsy, but biomarkers in serum or urine samples may provide an avenue for non-invasive routine testing. We aimed to validate a urinary protein panel for its ability to predict active renal involvement in SLE., Methods: A total of 197 SLE patients and 48 healthy controls were recruited, and urine samples collected. Seventy-five of the SLE patients had active LN and 104 had no or inactive renal disease. Concentrations of lipocalin-like prostaglandin D synthase (LPGDS), transferrin, alpha-1-acid glycoprotein (AGP-1), ceruloplasmin, monocyte chemoattractant protein 1 (MCP-1) and soluble vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (sVCAM-1) were quantified by MILLIPLEX® Assays using the MAGPIX Luminex platform. Binary logistic regression was conducted to examine whether proteins levels associate with active renal involvement and/or response to rituximab treatment., Results: Urine levels of transferrin (P <0.005), AGP-1 (P <0.0001), MCP-1 (P <0.001) and sVCAM-1 (P <0.005) were significantly higher in SLE patients when compared with healthy controls. Furthermore, levels of transferrin, AGP-1, ceruloplasmin, MCP-1 and sVCAM-1 (all P <0.0001) were higher in SLE patients with active LN when compared with patients without active LN. A combination of five urine proteins, namely LPGDS, transferrin, ceruloplasmin, MCP-1 and sVCAM-1 was a good predictor of active LN (AUC 0.898). A combined model of LPGDS, transferrin, AGP-1, ceruloplasmin, MCP-1 and sVCAM-1 predicted response to rituximab treatment at 12 months (AUC 0.818)., Conclusions: Findings support the use of a urinary protein panel to identify active LN and potentially predict response to treatment with rituximab in adult SLE patients. Prospective studies are required to confirm findings., (© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background: The safety and efficacy of 24 weeks of lumacaftor-ivacaftor combination therapy in children aged 6-11 years with cystic fibrosis homozygous for the F508del-CFTR mutation was previously shown in two phase 3 studies. Here, we report long-term safety and efficacy data., Methods: In this phase 3, open-label, multicentre, extension study (study 110), we examined the long-term safety, tolerability, and efficacy of lumacaftor-ivacaftor in children pooled from two phase 3 parent studies (open-label study 011B and randomised, placebo-controlled study 109). The study was conducted at 61 clinics in the USA, Australia, Belgium, Canada, Denmark, France, Germany, Sweden, and the UK. Children with cystic fibrosis homozygous for the F508del-CFTR mutation who had received lumacaftor-ivacaftor or placebo in the parent studies were treated with lumacaftor-ivacaftor for up to 96 weeks; those who had received the combination therapy in the parent studies (the treatment-to-treatment group) received up to 120 weeks of treatment in total. Participants aged 6-11 years at the start of the parent study received lumacaftor 200 mg-ivacaftor 250 mg orally once every 12 h; those aged 12 years or older received lumacaftor 400 mg-ivacaftor 250 mg orally once every 12 h. The primary endpoint was safety and tolerability in all children who had received at least one dose of the study drug. Secondary endpoints included change from baseline in lung clearance index 2·5% (LCI 2·5 ), sweat chloride concentration, body-mass index, and Cystic Fibrosis Questionnaire-Revised respiratory domain score. This extension study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02544451, and has been completed., Findings: The extension study ran from Aug 13, 2015, to Aug 17, 2018. Of 239 children who enrolled in the study and received at least one dose of lumacaftor-ivacaftor, 215 (90%) completed 96 weeks of treatment. Most children (236 [99%] of 239 children) had adverse events that were mild (49 [21%] of 239) or moderate (148 [62%] of 239) in severity, and there was a low rate of adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation. The most frequently reported adverse events were common manifestations or complications of cystic fibrosis, such as cough and pulmonary exacerbation, or were consistent with the known safety profile of lumacaftor-ivacaftor in older children and adults. No new safety concerns were identified with extended lumacaftor-ivacaftor treatment. Children in the placebo-to-treatment group had improvements in efficacy endpoints consistent with those observed in the parent studies. Improvements observed in children treated with lumacaftor-ivacaftor in the parent study were generally maintained in the extension study., Interpretation: Lumacaftor-ivacaftor therapy in children homozygous for F508del-CFTR who initiated treatment at age 6-11 years was generally safe and well tolerated, and efficacy was sustained for up to 120 weeks. These data support the long-term use of lumacaftor-ivacaftor to treat children aged 6 years and older who are homozygous for the F508del-CFTR mutation., Funding: Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Cystic fibrosis is a monogenic disease considered to affect at least 100 000 people worldwide. Mutations in CFTR, the gene encoding the epithelial ion channel that normally transports chloride and bicarbonate, lead to impaired mucus hydration and clearance. Classical cystic fibrosis is thus characterised by chronic pulmonary infection and inflammation, pancreatic exocrine insufficiency, male infertility, and might include several comorbidities such as cystic fibrosis-related diabetes or cystic fibrosis liver disease. This autosomal recessive disease is diagnosed in many regions following newborn screening, whereas in other regions, diagnosis is based on a group of recognised multiorgan clinical manifestations, raised sweat chloride concentrations, or CFTR mutations. Disease that is less easily diagnosed, and in some cases affecting only one organ, can be seen in the context of gene variants leading to residual protein function. Management strategies, including augmenting mucociliary clearance and aggressively treating infections, have gradually improved life expectancy for people with cystic fibrosis. However, restoration of CFTR function via new small molecule modulator drugs is transforming the disease for many patients. Clinical trial pipelines are actively exploring many other approaches, which will be increasingly needed as survival improves and as the population of adults with cystic fibrosis increases. Here, we present the current understanding of CFTR mutations, protein function, and disease pathophysiology, consider strengths and limitations of current management strategies, and look to the future of multidisciplinary care for those with cystic fibrosis., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests MS reports grants, personal fees, and non-financial support from GlaxoSmithKline; grants and non-financial support from Novartis and Trudell pharma; non-financial support from Actelion; and personal fees from Boeringer Ingelheim, AstraZeneca, and Vertex Pharmaceuticals, outside the submitted work. IJH reports grants from Wellcome Trust Institutional Strategic Support Fund, outside the submitted work. DP reports grants and personal fees from Vertex Pharmaceuticals, and grants from Laurent Pharmaceuticals, outside the submitted work. JCD reports grants from the Cystic Fibrosis Trust outside the submitted work; Advisory Board and clinical trial leadership activities for AlgiPharma, Galapagos NV, and Proteostasis Therapeutics; Advisory Board and trial design assistance for ImevaX; Advisory Board and national coordinator and global coinvestigator for Vertex Pharmaceuticals; Advisory Board activities for Boehringer Ingelheim, Nivalis Therapeutics, Raptor Pharmaceuticals, Enterprise, Novartis, Pulmocide, Flatley, and Arcturus Therapeutics; and has given lectures for Teva., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Our understanding of cystic fibrosis (CF) has grown exponentially since the discovery of the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator ( CFTR ) gene in 1989. With evolving genetic and genomic tools, we have come to better understand the role of CFTR genotypes in the pathophysiology of the disease. This, in turn, has paved the way for the development of modulator therapies targeted at mutations in the CFTR , which are arguably one of the greatest advances in the treatment of CF. These modulator therapies, however, do not target all the mutations in CFTR that are seen in patients with CF and, furthermore, a variation in response is seen in patients with the same genotype who are taking modulator therapies. There is growing evidence to support the role of non-CFTR modifiers, both genetic and environmental, in determining the variation seen in CF morbidity and mortality and also in the response to existing therapies. This review focusses on key findings from studies using candidate gene and genome-wide approaches to identify CF modifier genes of lung disease in cystic fibrosis and considers the interaction between modifiers and the response to modulator therapies. As the use of modulator therapies expands and we gain data around outcomes, it will be of great interest to investigate this interaction further. Going forward, it will also be crucial to better understand the relative influence of genomic versus environmental factors. With this understanding, we can truly begin to deliver personalised care by better profiling the likely disease phenotype for each patient and their response to treatment.

Colistin is an antibiotic of last resort, but has poor efficacy and resistance is a growing problem. Whilst it is well established that colistin disrupts the bacterial outer membrane (OM) by selectively targeting lipopolysaccharide (LPS), it was unclear how this led to bacterial killing. We discovered that MCR-1 mediated colistin resistance in Escherichia coli is due to modified LPS at the cytoplasmic rather than OM. In doing so, we also demonstrated that colistin exerts bactericidal activity by targeting LPS in the cytoplasmic membrane (CM). We then exploited this information to devise a new therapeutic approach. Using the LPS transport inhibitor murepavadin, we were able to cause LPS accumulation in the CM of Pseudomonas aeruginosa , which resulted in increased susceptibility to colistin in vitro and improved treatment efficacy in vivo. These findings reveal new insight into the mechanism by which colistin kills bacteria, providing the foundations for novel approaches to enhance therapeutic outcomes., Competing Interests: AS, KH, AK, MB, LE, RF, DM, RM, MS, JD, GL, TC, AE No competing interests declared, (© 2021, Sabnis et al.)

Antibiotic treatment for Pseudomonas aeruginosa (Pa) in cystic fibrosis is limited in efficacy and may lead to multi-drug resistance (MDR). Alternatives such as bacteriophages are being explored but well designed, and controlled trials are crucial. The rational selection of patients with bacteriophage susceptible infections is required for both safety and efficacy monitoring. We questioned whether bacteriophage susceptibility profiles were constant or variable over time, variability having been reported with antibiotics. Serial Pa isolates (n = 102) from 24 chronically infected cystic fibrosis (CF) patients over one year were investigated with plaque and antibiotic disc diffusion assays. Variable number tandem repeat (VNTR) analysis identified those patients with >1 isolate. A median (range) of 4 (3-6) isolates/patient were studied. Twenty-one (87.5%) individuals had a single VNTR type; three (12.5%) had two VNTR types at different times. Seventy-five percent of isolates were sensitive to bacteriophage at ≥ 1 concentration; 50% of isolates were antibiotic multidrug resistant. Serial isolates, even when representing a single VNTR type, varied in sensitivity to both bacteriophages and antibiotics. The rates of sensitivity to bacteriophage supports the development of this therapy; however, the variability in response has implications for the selection of patients in future trials which must be on the basis of current, not past, isolate testing.

Introduction: Engaging people with cystic fibrosis (CF) in clinical trials is critical to improving outcomes for this fatal disease. Following extensive exploration of engagement in CF trials we believe six key concepts require a quantitative understanding of their influence in the current CF trials landscape including how controversial issues like placebos, washouts, stipend provision and location of trial visits are viewed by the CF community and how these might be modified depending on the type of medicine being investigated and the mechanism of access to the drug on trial completion., Methods and Analysis: We have designed and will administer an online discrete choice experiment to elicit and quantify preferences of people with CF for these trials' attributes and estimate the relative importance of an attribute when choosing to participate in a trial. The cross-sectional data generated will be explored using conditional multinomial logit model. Mixed logit models such as the random-parameters logit and a latent class models will be used to explore preference heterogeneity. To determine the relative importance of an attribute, the difference between the attribute level with the highest preference weight and the level with the lowest preference weight will be calculated., Ethics and Dissemination: Imperial College London Joint Research Compliance Office has granted ethical approval for this study. Patient consent will be sought following full explanation. No identifying information will be collected. Dissemination will be via international conferences, peer-review publication and patient accessible forums. Major CF trials networks have agreed to incorporate our findings into their review process, meaning our results can realistically influence and optimise CF trial delivery., Prospero Registration Number: CRD42020184886., Competing Interests: Competing interests: RD, MB, FK and SM have no competing interests to declare. JCD has served on advisory boards and participated in clinical trial leadership, educational activities and grant review board activities for a number of pharma companies active in CF clinical trials: Vertex, PTI, Galapagos, AbbVie, AlgiPharma, Chiesi, Enterprise, Teva, Ionis, Eloxx, Roche and Gilead. JSE has provided consultancy and advice for Vertex, Celtaxsys, Corbus, Ionis in clinical trial design and delivery. He also holds an EU Innovative medicines Initiative grant with Novartis, Polyphor and Alaxia., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Rationale: We previously reported that ivacaftor was safe and well tolerated in cohorts aged 12 to <24 months with cystic fibrosis and gating mutations in the ARRIVAL study; here, we report results for cohorts aged 4 to <12 months. Objectives: To evaluate the safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of ivacaftor in infants aged 4 to <12 months with one or more gating mutations. Methods: ARRIVAL is a single-arm phase 3 study. Infants received 25 mg or 50 mg ivacaftor every 12 hours on the basis of age and weight for 4 days in part A and 24 weeks in part B. Measurements and Main Results: Primary endpoints were safety (parts A and B) and pharmacokinetics (part A). Secondary/tertiary endpoints (part B) included pharmacokinetics and changes in sweat chloride levels, growth, and markers of pancreatic function. Twenty-five infants received ivacaftor, 12 in part A and 17 in part B (four infants participated in both parts). Pharmacokinetics was consistent with that in older groups. Most adverse events were mild or moderate. In part B, cough was the most common adverse event ( n  = 10 [58.8%]). Five infants (part A, n  = 1 [8.3%]; part B, n  = 4 [23.5%]) had serious adverse events, all of which were considered to be not or unlikely related to ivacaftor. No deaths or treatment discontinuations occurred. One infant (5.9%) experienced an alanine transaminase elevation >3 to ≤5× the upper limit of normal at Week 24. No other adverse trends in laboratory tests, vital signs, or ECG parameters were reported. Sweat chloride concentrations and measures of pancreatic obstruction improved. Conclusions: This study of ivacaftor in the first year of life supports treating the underlying cause of cystic fibrosis in children aged ≥4 months with one or more gating mutations.Clinical trial registered with clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02725567).

Rationale: Ivacaftor's clinical effects in the residual function mutations 3849 + 10kb C→T and D1152H warrant further characterization. Objectives: To evaluate ivacaftor's effect in people with cystic fibrosis aged ≥6 years with 3849 + 10kb C→T or D1152H residual function mutations and to explore the correlation between ivacaftor-induced organoid-based cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator function measurements and clinical response to ivacaftor. Methods: Participants were randomized (1:1) in this placebo-controlled crossover study; each treatment sequence included two 8-week treatments with an 8-week washout period. The primary endpoint was absolute change in lung clearance index 2.5 from baseline through Week 8. Additional endpoints included lung function, patient-reported outcomes, and in vitro intestinal organoid-based measurements of ivacaftor-induced cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator function. Results: Of 38 participants, 37 completed the study. The primary endpoint was met; the Bayesian posterior probability of improvement in lung clearance index 2.5 with ivacaftor versus placebo was >99%. Additional endpoints improved with ivacaftor. Safety findings were consistent with ivacaftor's known safety profile. Dose-dependent swelling was observed in 23 of 25 viable organoid cultures with ivacaftor treatment. Correlations between ivacaftor-induced organoid swelling and clinical endpoints were negligible to low. Conclusions: In people with cystic fibrosis aged ≥6 years with a 3849 + 10kb C→T or D1152H mutation, ivacaftor treatment improved clinical endpoints compared with placebo; however, there was no correlation between organoid swelling and change in clinical endpoints. The organoid assay may assist in identification of ivacaftor-responsive mutations but in this study did not predict magnitude of clinical benefit for individual people with cystic fibrosis with these two mutations.Clinical trial registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03068312).

Pseudomonas aeruginosa (Pa) infection is a major cause of airway inflammation in immunocompromised and cystic fibrosis (CF) patients. Mitogen-activated protein (MAP) and tyrosine kinases are integral to inflammatory responses and are therefore potential targets for novel anti-inflammatory therapies. We have determined the involvement of specific kinases in Pa-induced inflammation. The effects of kinase inhibitors against p38MAPK, MEK 1/2, JNK 1/2, Syk or c-Src, a combination of a p38MAPK with Syk inhibitor, or a novel narrow spectrum kinase inhibitor (NSKI), were evaluated against the release of the proinflammatory cytokine/chemokine, IL-6 and CXCL8 from BEAS-2B and CFBE41o- epithelial cells by Pa. Effects of a Syk inhibitor against phosphorylation of the MAPKs were also evaluated. IL-6 and CXCL8 release by Pa were significantly inhibited by p38MAPK and Syk inhibitors (p<0.05). Phosphorylation of HSP27, but not ERK or JNK, was significantly inhibited by Syk kinase inhibition. A combination of p38MAPK and Syk inhibitors showed synergy against IL-6 and CXCL8 induction and an NSKI completely inhibited IL-6 and CXCL8 at low concentrations. Pa-induced inflammation is dependent on p38MAPK primarily, and Syk partially, which is upstream of p38MAPK. The NSKI suggests that inhibiting specific combinations of kinases is a potent potential therapy for Pa-induced inflammation., Competing Interests: I have read the journal’s policy and the authors of this manuscript have the following competing interests: Previously Matthew S. Coates was employed by Respivert Ltd. Garth W. Rapeport and Kazuhiro Ito were co-founders and employees of Respivert Ltd. During the period of the research G. W. Rapeport and K. Ito were co-founders and employees of Pulmocide Ltd. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.

Since the discovery of the gene responsible for cystic fibrosis (CF) in 1989, hopes have been pinned on a future with novel therapies tackling the basis of the disease rather than its symptoms. These have become a reality over the last decade with the development through to the clinic of CF transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) modulators. These are oral drugs which improve CFTR protein function through either increasing the time the channel pore is open (potentiators) or facilitating its trafficking through the cell to its location on the cell membrane (correctors). The first potentiator, ivacaftor, is now licensed and available clinically in many parts of the world. It is highly effective with impressive clinical impact in the lungs and gastrointestinal tract; longer-term data from patient registries show fewer exacerbations, a slower rate of lung function loss and reduced need for transplantation in patients receiving ivacaftor. However, as a single drug, it is suitable for only a small minority of patients. The commonest CFTR mutation, F508del, requires both correction and potentiation for clinical efficacy. Two dual-agent drugs (lumacaftor/ivacaftor and tezacaftor/ivacaftor) have progressed through to licensing, although their short term impact is more modest than that of ivacaftor; this is likely due to only partial correction of protein misfolding and trafficking. Most recently, triple compounds have been developed: two different corrector molecules (elexacaftor and tezacaftor) which, by addressing different regions in the misfolded F508del protein, more effectively improve trafficking. In addition to large improvements in clinical outcomes in people with two copies of F508del, the combination is sufficiently effective that it works in patients with only one copy of F508del and a second, nonmodulator responsive mutation. For the first time, we thus have a drug suitable for around 85% of people with CF. Even more gains are likely to be possible when these drugs can be used in younger children, although more sensitive outcome measures are needed for this age group. Special consideration is needed for people with very rare mutations; those with nonmodulatable mutation combinations will likely require gene or messenger RNA-based therapeutic approaches, many of which are being explored. Although this progress is hugely to be celebrated, we still have more work to do. The international collaboration between trials networks, pharma, patient organizations, registries, and people with CF is something we are all rightly proud of, but innovative trial design and implementation will be needed if we are to continue to build on this progress and further develop drugs for people with CF., (© 2020 The Authors. Pediatric Pulmonology Published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Background: The CFTR modulator tezacaftor/ivacaftor was efficacious and generally safe and well tolerated in Phase 3 studies in participants ≥12 years of age with cystic fibrosis (CF) homozygous for the F508del-CFTR mutation or heterozygous with a residual function-CFTR mutation (F/F or F/RF respectively). We evaluated tezacaftor/ivacaftor's efficacy and safety over 8 weeks in participants 6 through 11 years of age with these mutations., Methods: Participants were randomized 4:1 to tezacaftor/ivacaftor or a blinding group (placebo for F/F, ivacaftor for F/RF). The primary endpoint was within-group change from baseline in the lung clearance index 2·5 (LCI 2·5 ) through Week 8. Secondary endpoints were change from baseline in sweat chloride (SwCl), cystic fibrosis questionnaire-revised (CFQ-R) respiratory domain score, and safety., Results: Sixty-seven participants received at least one study drug dose. Of those, 54 received tezacaftor/ivacaftor (F/F, 42; F/RF, 12), 10 placebo, and 3 ivacaftor; 66 completed the study. The within-group change in LCI 2·5 was significantly reduced (improved) by -0·51 (95% CI: -0·74, -0·29). SwCl concentration decreased (improved) by -12·3 mmol/L and CFQ-R respiratory domain score increased (improved, nonsignificantly) by 2·3 points. There were no serious adverse events (AEs) or AEs leading to tezacaftor/ivacaftor discontinuation or interruption. The most common AEs (≥10%) in participants receiving tezacaftor/ivacaftor were cough, headache, and productive cough., Conclusions: Tezacaftor/ivacaftor improved lung function (assessed using LCI) and CFTR function (measured by SwCl concentration) in participants 6 through 11 years of age with F/F or F/RF genotypes. Tezacaftor/ivacaftor was safe and well tolerated; no new safety concerns were identified., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest All authors received nonfinancial support (assistance with manuscript preparation) from ArticulateScience LLC, which received funding from Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated. Additional disclosures are as follows: CAO, DC, EH, NA, PP, and RSH are employees of Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated and may own stock or stock options in Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated. CSa: LCI over reading fees with Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated during the conduct of the study. CW: Income on a per-patient basis derived from pharmaceutical studies (Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated and Boehringer-Ingelheim); research grant from Novo Nordisk Pharmaceuticals for the P/L-CF-IDEA study; Vertex Pharmaceuticals P/L honorarium to attend the CF International Advisory Board Meeting in February 2014; Vertex Pharmaceuticals P/L honorarium to attend CF Medical Advisory Board Meeting in Adelaide in April 2014; Novartis Pharmaceuticals P/L honorarium to present a symposium at the National Pediatric Congress in Lebanon in May 2014; Vertex Pharmaceuticals P/L return travel and honorarium for lecture & discussions at the European CF Conference in Gothenburg in June 2014; DKBmed, LLC honorarium to present symposium at the North American CF Conference Georgia in October 2014; Vertex Pharmaceuticals P/L honorarium to present as speaker in an educational meeting series in Brisbane and Sydney in April 2015; Vertex Pharmaceuticals P/L honorarium to attend the Vertex Steering Committee Meetings on the VX15-770-123 study in 2014; Vertex Pharmaceuticals P/L honorarium for Vertex Medical Advisory Board-Innovative endpoints in CF in August 2015; University of Miami honorarium for meeting attendance in 2015; Thorax honorarium for associate editor duties in Q3/Q4 2015; BMJ honorarium for work as a reviewer; Vertex Pharmaceuticals 2015 Chicago return flight and accommodation for work as investigator in lumacaftor study; Vertex Pharmaceuticals 2015-2017 honorarium for being a speaker at Vertex-sponsored educational meeting series in Australia; Vertex Pharmaceuticals 2016 Phoenix return flight and accommodation as investigator in the Next Gen study; Vertex Pharmaceuticals December 2016 honoraria for work as a speaker at a Vertex-sponsored educational meeting in Liverpool, UK; DKBmed eCF review issue honoraria in January 2017; Vertex Pharmaceuticals March 2017 honoraria for being a speaker at TSANZ meeting; Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated 2014-2018 honorarium for acting as a consultant on the Vertex Orkambi 6-11 HTA Advisory Board, the Global Pediatric Advisory Committee, the Global Medical Advisory Board, and the VIA Grants Committee; Gilead Sciences Ltd. honorarium for meeting attendance on CF imaging; honorarium for In Vivo Academy Limited for webcast meeting attendance at ECFC 2018; Vertex Pharmaceuticals P/L honorarium to present as a speaker in an educational meeting at ECFC in Belgrade 2018; Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated honorarium to attend the Next Gen Early Lifecycle Management Plan in London in 2018; Vertex Pharmaceuticals P/L to act as consultant and to render such services in the form of documents, advice, meetings, and conferences from October 2018 to present; Vertex Pharmaceuticals (Australia) P/L to attend as a steering committee member at the Medical Symposium Event (SHIFT 2019) in Perth in 2019; Vertex Pharmaceuticals P/L to attend the EU Real World Evidence steering committee in Amsterdam in 2019; Current board positions: International Advisory Board, Vertex Pharmaceuticals P/L; Associate Editor, Thorax; Associate Editor, Respirology. ISG: Support for scientific project and PI of different clinical trials with Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated during the conduct of this study. JCD: advisory board and clinical trial lead with Algipharma AS, UK lead investigator and advisory board with Bayer AG, advisory board with Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co. KG, advisory board and clinical trial leadership with Galapagos NV, advisory and trial design assistance with ImevaX GmbH, advisory board with Nivalis Therapeutics Inc, advisory board and trial design advice with ProQR Therapeutics III B.V., advisory and clinical trial leadership with Proteostasis Therapeutics Inc, advisory with Raptor Pharmaceuticals Inc, advisory board and National Co-ord/Global Co-I with Vertex Pharmaceuticals (Europe) Limited, advisory board with Enterprise, Novartis, Pulmocide, and Flatley, grant from CF Trust, and educational activities with Teva outside the submitted work. CSh and LN had nothing further to disclose., (Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a significant nosocomial pathogen and is associated with lung infections in cystic fibrosis (CF). Once established, P. aeruginosa infections persist and are rarely eradicated despite host immune cells producing antimicrobial oxidants, including hypochlorous acid (HOCl) and hypothiocyanous acid (HOSCN). There is limited knowledge as to how P. aeruginosa senses, responds to, and protects itself against HOCl and HOSCN and the contribution of such responses to its success as a CF pathogen. To investigate the P. aeruginosa response to these oxidants, we screened 707 transposon mutants, with mutations in regulatory genes, for altered growth following HOCl exposure. We identified regulators of antibiotic resistance, methionine biosynthesis, catabolite repression, and PA14&#95;07340, the homologue of the Escherichia coli HOCl-sensor RclR (30% identical), which are required for protection against HOCl. We have shown that RclR (PA14&#95;07340) protects specifically against HOCl and HOSCN stress and responds to both oxidants by upregulating the expression of a putative peroxiredoxin, rclX (PA14&#95;07355). Transcriptional analysis revealed that while there was specificity in the response to HOCl (231 genes upregulated) and HOSCN (105 genes upregulated), there was considerable overlap, with 74 genes upregulated by both oxidants. These included genes encoding the type 3 secretion system, sulfur and taurine transport, and the MexEF-OprN efflux pump. RclR coordinates part of the response to both oxidants, including upregulation of pyocyanin biosynthesis genes, and, in the presence of HOSCN, downregulation of chaperone genes. These data indicate that the P. aeruginosa response to HOCl and HOSCN is multifaceted, with RclR playing an essential role. IMPORTANCE The bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas aeruginosa causes devastating infections in immunocompromised hosts, including chronic lung infections in cystic fibrosis patients. To combat infection, the host's immune system produces the antimicrobial oxidants hypochlorous acid (HOCl) and hypothiocyanous acid (HOSCN). Little is known about how P. aeruginosa responds to and survives attack from these oxidants. To address this, we carried out two approaches: a mutant screen and transcriptional study. We identified the P. aeruginosa transcriptional regulator, RclR, which responds specifically to HOCl and HOSCN stress and is essential for protection against both oxidants. We uncovered a link between the P. aeruginosa transcriptional response to these oxidants and physiological processes associated with pathogenicity, including antibiotic resistance and the type 3 secretion system., (Copyright © 2020 Farrant et al.)

Competing Interests: Disclosures of Competing Interest Prof. Jane Davies has performed clinical trial leadership roles, educational and/ or advisory activities for the following: Abbvie, Algipharma AS, Bayer AG, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co. KG, Eloxx, Enterprise, Galapagos NV, ImevaX GmbH, Ionis, Nivalis Therapeutics, Inc., Novartis, ProQR Therapeutics III B.V., Proteostasis Therapeutics, INC., Pulmocide Raptor Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Vertex Pharmaceuticals. Clare Saunders and Christopher Short have no disclosures of interest.

Purpose of Review: Early stage lung disease has long been synonymous with infancy and childhood. As diagnosis happens earlier and conventional management improves, we are seeing larger proportions of people with cystic fibrosis (CF) in adolescence and even adulthood with well preserved lung health. The availability of highly effective cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator modulator drugs for a large proportion of the CF population will impact even further. Transitioning into adult care with 'normal' lung function will become more common. However, it is crucial that we are not blasé about this phase, which sets the scene for future lung health. It is well recognized that lung function assessed by spirometry is insensitive to 'early' changes occurring in the distal, small airways. Much of our learning has come from studies in infants and young children, which have allowed assessment and optimization of alternative forms of monitoring., Recent Findings: Here, as a group of paediatric and adult CF specialists, we review the evidence base for sensitive physiological testing based on multibreath washout, lung imaging, exercise and activity monitoring, assessment of infection and quality of life measures., Summary: We seek to emphasise the importance of further work in these areas, as outcome measures become widely applicable to a growing CF population.

Background: OligoG is a low molecular-weight alginate oligosaccharide that improves the viscoelastic properties of cystic fibrosis (CF) mucus and disrupts biofilms, thereby potentiating the activity of antimicrobial agents. The efficacy of inhaled OligoG was evaluated in adult patients with CF., Methods: A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled multicentre crossover study was used to demonstrate safety and efficacy of inhaled dry powder OligoG. Subjects were randomly allocated to receive OligoG 1050 mg per day (10 capsules three times daily) or matching placebo for 28 days, with 28-day washout periods following each treatment period. The primary end-point was absolute change in percentage predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV 1 ) at the end of 28-day treatment. The intention-to-treat (ITT) population (n=65) was defined as randomised to treatment with at least one administration of study medication and post-dosing evaluation., Results: In this study, 90 adult subjects were screened and 65 were randomised. Statistically significant improvement in FEV 1 was not observed in the ITT population. Adverse events included nasopharyngitis, cough and pulmonary exacerbation. The number and proportions of patients with adverse events and serious adverse events were similar between OligoG and placebo group., Conclusions: Inhalation of OligoG-dry powder over 28 days was safe in adult CF subjects. Statistically significant improvement of FEV 1 was not reached. The planned analyses did not indicate a significant treatment benefit with OligoG compared to placebo. Post hoc exploratory analyses showed subgroup results that indicate that further studies of OligoG in this patient population are justified., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: S. van Koningsbruggen-Rietschel reports grants from Horizon 2020 and personal fees from DZIF, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: J.C. Davies reports work on an advisory board and as a clinical trial lead for Algipharma AS, work as UK Lead Investigator and on an advisory board for Bayer AG, work on an advisory board for Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co. KG, work on an advisory board and clinical trial leadership for Galapagos NV, advisory and clinical trial design assistance for ImevaX GmbH, work on an advisory board for Nivalis Therapeutics, Inc., work on an advisory board and clinical trial design advice for ProQR Therapeutics III B.V., advisory work and clinical trial leadership for Proteostasis Therapeutics, Inc., advisory work for Raptor Pharmaceuticals, Inc., work on an advisory board and National Co-ord/Global Co-I for Vertex Pharmaceuticals (Europe) Limited, work on advisory boards for Enterprise, Novartis, Pulmocide and Flatley, grants from the CF Trust, and educational activities for Teva, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: T. Pressler has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: R. Fischer has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: G. MacGregor has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: S.H. Donaldson reports grants from AlgiPharma during the conduct of the study; and grants from Vertex Pharmaceuticals, AstraZeneca and Proteostasis Therapeutics outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: K. Smerud reports that his employer, Smerud Medical Research International AS, is a contract research organisation that delivered clinical trial management services (clinical trial management, clinical trial applications, data management, statistical planning and analysis, monitoring, and medical writing) to Algipharma and was remunerated for that work. Conflict of interest: N. Meland reports grants from AlgiPharma AS during the conduct of the study. Conflict of interest: J. Mortensen has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: M.Ø. Fosbøl has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: D.G. Downey reports grants and personal fees from Vertex, Proteostasis, Chiesi and Gilead, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: A.H. Myrset reports grants from Cystic Fibrosis Foundation during the conduct of the study, and holds stock in AlgiPharma AB outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: H. Flaten reports grants from Cystic Fibrosis Foundation during the conduct of the study; and is a qualified person for Pharmacovigilance for AlgiPharma and holds stock in AlgiPharma AB, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: P.D. Rye reports grants from Cystic Fibrosis Foundation during the conduct of the study, and is Chief Scientific Officer at AlgiPharma and holds stock in AlgiPharma AB, outside the submitted work; in addition, he has patents WO 2015/128495 and WO 2016/151051 pending., (Copyright ©ERS 2020.)

Background: Evaluation of multiple breath washout (MBW) set-up including staff training, certification and central "over-reading" for data quality control is essential to determine the feasibility of MBW in future bronchiectasis studies., Aims: To assess the outcomes of a MBW training, certification and central over-reading programme., Methods: MBW training and certification was conducted in European sites collecting lung clearance index (LCI) data in the BronchUK Clinimetrics and/or i-BEST-1 studies. The blended training programme included the use of an eLearning tool and a 1-day face-to-face session. Sites submitted MBW data to trained central over-readers who determined validity and quality., Results: Thirteen training days were delivered to 56 participants from 22 sites. Of 22 sites, 18 (82%) were MBW naïve. Participant knowledge and confidence increased significantly (p<0.001). By the end of the study recruitment, 15 of 22 sites (68%) had completed certification with a mean (range) time since training of 6.2 (3-14) months. In the BronchUK Clinimetrics study, 468 of 589 (79%) tests met the quality criteria following central over-reading, compared with 137 of 236 (58%) tests in the i-BEST-1 study., Conclusions: LCI is feasible in a bronchiectasis multicentre clinical trial setting; however, consideration of site experience in terms of training as well as assessment of skill drift and the need for re-training may be important to reduce time to certification and optimise data quality. Longer times to certification, a higher percentage of naïve sites and patients with worse lung function may have contributed to the lower success rate in the i-BEST-1 study., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: K. O'Neill reports grants from European Union IMI (grant agreement number 115721) and Novartis during the conduct of the study. Conflict of interest: K. Ferguson has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: D. Cosgrove has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: M.M. Tunney reports grants from European Union IMI (grant agreement number 115721) and Novartis during the conduct of the study. Conflict of interest: A. De Soyza reports grants and personal fees from AstraZeneca, medImmune, Insmed, Bayer, Pfizer, GSK, Novartis and Chiesi outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: M. Carroll has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: J.D. Chalmers reports research grants for COPD and personal fees from GlaxoSmithKline and Boehringer Ingelheim, research grants for COPD from AstraZeneca, research grants for COPD and personal fees from Pfizer, research grants for bronchiectasis and personal fees from Bayer Healthcare and Grifols, consulting fees from Napp and the Aradigm Corporation, and grants and personal fees from Insmed, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: T. Gatheral has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: A.T. Hill has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: J.R. Hurst reports grants, personal fees and nonfinancial support from pharmaceutical companies that make medicines to treat bronchiectasis, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: C. Johnson has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: M.R. Loebinger reports personal fees from AstraZeneca, Grifols and Polyphor outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: G. Angyalosi reports grants from the IMI Joint Undertaking iABC grant agreement number 115721 and other support from Novartis Pharma AG, during the conduct of the study; and is Novartis Pharma AG employee. Conflict of interest: C.S. Haworth reports an EU-funded IMI grant during the conduct of the study; personal fees from Aradigm, Grifols and Chiesi, grants and personal fees from Insmed, personal fees from Gilead and GSK, collaborated on an IMI grant with Novartis, and grants and personal fees from TEVA, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: R. Jensen has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: F. Ratjen reports grants and personal fees from Vertex, and personal fees from Novartis, Bayer, Roche and Genetech, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: C. Saunders has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: C. Short has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: J.C. Davies has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: J.S. Elborn reports grants from the Framework Seven IMI during the conduct of the study. Conflict of interest: J.M. Bradley has nothing to disclose., (Copyright ©ERS 2020.)

Introduction: Airway clearance techniques (ACTs) are a gold standard of cystic fibrosis management; however, the majority of research evidence for their efficacy is of low standard; often attributed to the lack of sensitivity from outcome measures (OMs) used historically. This randomised controlled trial (RCT) investigates these standard OMs (sputum weight, forced expiratory volume in 1 s) and new OMs (electrical impedance tomography (EIT), multiple breath washout (MBW) and impulse oscillometry (IOS)) to determine the most useful measures of ACT., Methods and Analysis: This is a single-centre RCT with crossover design. Participants perform MBW, IOS and spirometry, and then are randomised to either rest or supervised ACT lasting 30-60 min. MBW, IOS and spirometry are repeated immediately afterwards. EIT and sputum are collected during rest/ACT. On a separate day, the OMs are performed with the other intervention. Primary endpoint is difference in change in OMs before and after ACT/rest. Sample size was calculated with 80% power and significance of 5% for each OM (target n=64)., Ethics and Dissemination: Ethics approval was gained from the London-Chelsea Research Ethics Committee (reference 16/LO/0995, project ID 154635). Dissemination will involve scientific conference presentation and publication in a peer-reviewed journal., Trial Registration Numbers: ISRCTN11220163 and NCT02721498., Competing Interests: Competing interests: JD reports other from Algipharma AS; Bayer AG; Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co. KG; Galapagos NV; ImevaX GmbH; Nivalis Therapeutics; ProQR Therapeutics III B.V.; Proteostasis Therapeutics; Raptor Pharmaceuticals; Vertex Pharmaceuticals (Europe) Limited; Enterprise; Novartis; Pulmocide; Flatley; Teva and grants from CF Trust outside the submitted work. NJS reports personal fees from Vertex; Chiesi; Teva; Roche; Pulmocide and Zambon outside the submitted work., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

CFTR modulators associated with substantial clinical benefit are expected to rapidly improve the baseline condition of people with cystic fibrosis (PWCF) as well as decrease the rate of lung function decline, the occurrence of pulmonary exacerbations and likely even other disease complications. These changes in clinical status of PWCF introduced by clinically effective modulator therapy will have major repercussions on modalities of future CF drug development. As part of its 'Strategic Plan to speed up Access to new Drugs', the European Cystic Fibrosis Society (ECFS) convened a meeting in Brussels on November 27 th 2019 with relevant stakeholders (CF researchers and clinicians, patient organization and pharmaceutical company representatives, regulators, health technology assessors; see Acknowledgments for list of attendees) to discuss the future of clinical trials in cystic fibrosis (CF) in the context of HEMT entering the clinical arena. The following is the conclusion of the presentations and discussions. It is hoped that these concepts will be considered in future regulatory guidelines and may provide rationale and support for alternative trial designs., (Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

As CFTR modulator therapy transforms the landscape of cystic fibrosis (CF) care, its lack of uniform access across the globe combined with the shift towards a new standard of care creates unique challenges for the development of future CF therapies. The advancement of a full and promising CF therapeutics pipeline remains a necessary priority to ensure maximal clinical benefits for all people with CF. It is through collaboration across the global CF community that we can optimize the evaluation and approval process of new therapies. To this end, we must identify areas for which harmonization is lacking and for which efficiencies can be gained to promote ethical, feasible, and credible study designs amidst the changing CF care landscape. This article summarizes the counsel from core advisors across multiple international regions and clinical trial networks, developed during a one-day workshop in October 2019. The goal of the workshop was to identify, in consideration of the highly transitional era of CFTR modulator availability, the drug development areas for which global alignment is currently uncertain, and paths forward that will enable advancement of CF therapeutic development., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest NMH serves as a consultant through her institution in her role as Executive Director of the CF Therapeutics Development Network Coordinating Center (CF TDNCC) and has received personal consulting fees from Kala Pharmaceuticals and Calithera. She has received grant funding from the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation (CFF) and National Institutes of Health (NIH). SvKR has received personal consulting fees from Antabio, Proteostasis Therapeutics (PTI), and Vertex Pharmaceuticals (VRTX). She has received grant support to her institution for her participation in the European Union HORIZON 2020 work. DPN serves as a consultant through his institution in his role as Medical Director of CF TDNCC. He has received grant support to his Institution from the CFF and Gilead Sciences. DRV has received personal consulting fees from AbbVie, Albumedix, AN2, Aradigm, Armata, Arrevus, Calithera, Chiesi USA, Cipla, Corbus, CFF, Eloxx, Enbiotix, Eveo, Galephar, Horizon, IBF, ICON clinical sciences, Ionis, Kala, Merck, Microbion, NDA, Protalix, PTC, Pulmocide, Recida, Savara, Vast, and VRTX. JCD has received other support from Aligipharma AS, Bayer AG, BI, Galapagos NV, ImevaX GmbH, Nivalis Therapeutics, ProQR Therapeutics, PTI, Raptor Pharamceuticals, VRTX, Enterprise, Novartis, Pulmocide, Flately and Teva for advisory board and educational activities. She has received grant support from the CF Trust. TL has received personal fees from Alan Boyd Consultants, Ltd for his participation in DSMB activities. FAR has received personal consulting fees from Novartis, Bayer, Roche, and Genentech for participation in CF related consulting activities. He has received grant support to his institution from VRTX for his participation as site PI in multicenter trials which they have funded as well as personal consulting fees. MWK has received personal consulting fees for advisory board participation, grant support to his institution for clinical trial participation, and non-financial support from VRTX, Savara, Laurent, Corbus Pharmaceuticals, PTC, and AzurRx. He has received personal consulting fees and non-financial support from Chiesi, Celtaxsys, Merck, and Kala. Personal consulting fees were received from Albumedix, Paranta, Protalix, Santhera, pH Pharma, Novartis, Ionis, the Italian Cystic Fibrosis Foundation, and the Food and Drug Administration. Grant support was provided to his Institution by NIH. Grant support was provided to his Institution by Anthera as well as personal consulting fees. SCB has received support from VRTX, Galapagos, and AbbVie for his participation in advisory boards and as site PI in multicenter trials which they have funded. JLTC has received personal consulting fees from Gilead Sciences, Protalix, and Santhera for participation in advisory board activities. She has received grant support to her institution from PTI, Celtaxsys, and VRTX as well as personal consulting fees for advisory activities. Grant support to her institution for her participation as site PI in a multicenter trial which they have funded from Eloxx. KDB has received consulting fees from Boehringer-Ingelheim (BI), Protalix Biotherapeutics, Raptor Pharmaceuticals, Novabiotics, Eloxx Pharmaceutics, Galapagos, and Chiesi. She has received speaker fees from Teva Pharmaceutical Industries and serves on the Steering Committee and Advisory Board for VRTX. DGD has received consulting fees from VRTX and consulting fees as well as grant support from PTI and Chiesi. PAF has received personal consulting fees from the Food and Drug Administration, Polyphor, and Santhera. He has received personal consulting fees and grant support from CFF, PTI, Savara, and VRTX. He has received grant support from NIH, Novartis, Novoteris, and Sound Pharmaceuticals. PD has received personal consulting fees from VRTX, PTI, and Actelion Pharmaceuticals. He has also received support for his participation as site PI in multicenter trials funded by Corbus Pharmaceuticals and VRTX. CHG has received grant funding from CFF, NIH, the European Commission and the Food and Drug Administration. He has also received honoraria from Gilead Sciences for grant reviews, honoraria from VRTX and Mylan for invited talks, and BI for participation as a PI in a multicenter trial in CF that they have funded. IF has received consulting fees and support from PTI, VRTX and BI for her participation in advisory boards as well as site PI in multicenter trials which they have funded. She has received support from Corbus Pharmaceuticals for participation as site PI in multicenter trials which they have funded ASM has received grant support to her Institution from CFF. BSQ has received grant support to his institution from the Cystic Fibrosis Canada, CFF, Michael Smith Foundation for Health Research, BC Lung Association, and Gilead Sciences. GZRB's institution has received support from the CFF, NIH and VRTX. for his participation as site PI in multicenter trials which they have funded. AGD, KP, JPC, SHD, SMS, and JMVD have nothing to disclose., (Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Prior to the use of cystic fibrosis (CF) modulator therapy, exocrine pancreatic insufficiency in CF was thought to be irreversible. Improvement in pancreatic function on ivacaftor has been reported in open label studies in 1-5 year olds. The mechanism by which ivacaftor might improve exocrine pancreatic function is unclear. Although the effect of ivacaftor on pancreatic function may be more significant in younger children, evidence is mounting that there may still be potential for improvement in older children on long term therapy., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: The multiple breath nitrogen washout (MBW) test offers a sensitive measure of airway function. In this study we aim to (a) assess the validity of the EasyOne Pro LAB (MBW ndd ) in an in vitro lung model, (b) assess the feasibility, repeatability, and reproducibility of MBW ndd and (c) compare outcomes with the Exhalyzer D (MBW EM ) and body plethysmography., Methods: In vitro, functional residual capacity (FRC) measurements were assessed using a lung model under quasi-physiological conditions and compared to measured FRC. In vivo plethysmography and MBW were performed in a prospective study of children at two visits (n = 45 healthy; n = 41 cystic fibrosis [CF]). Bland-Altman plots were used to compare agreement between FRC and lung clearance index (LCI) measurements., Results: In vitro FRC ndd measurements were repeatable but lung volumes were underestimated (mean relative difference -5.4% (limits of agreement [LA] -9.6%; -1.1%), 95% confidence interval (CI) -6.27; -4.45). In vivo, compared to plethysmography, FRC ndd was consistently lower (-19.3% [-40.5; 1.9], 95% CI [-23.9; -14.7]), and showed a volume dependency. LCI ndd values were also higher in children with smaller lung volumes. The within-test coefficient of variation of the FRC ndd and LCI ndd were 4.9% in health, and 5.6% and 6.9% in CF respectively. LCI ndd was reproducible between-visits (mean relative difference [LA] -3.7% [-14.8, -7.5; 95% CI -6.6; -0.73] in health [n = 17] and 0.34% [-13.2, 22.8; 95% CI -5.0; 5.69] in CF [n = 23]). When calculated using the same algorithm, LCI ndd was similar to LCI EM in health., Conclusions: MBW ndd measurements are feasible, repeatable, and reproducible, however, MBW-derived outcomes are not interchangeable with MBW EM ., (© 2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Introduction: Paediatric obstructive sleep apnoea is associated with systemic inflammation and co-morbidities. We assessed whether sleep disordered breathing (SDB) due to neuromuscular weakness was associated with elevated airway and systemic pro-inflammatory cytokines., Methods: Consecutive neuromuscular children (age 5-18years) underwent overnight full polysomnography and morning collection of serum and breath condensate, analysed for cytokines (Interleukin-10, Interleukin-6, Interleukin-1β, Tumour Necrosis Factorα, high-sensitivity C-Reactive Protein, Intercellular and Vascular Adhesion Molecules ICAM-1, VCAM-1). Cytokine levels were related to Oxygen desaturation index (ODI), desaturation>4%/h, and levels of transcutaneous carbon dioxide overnight (tcCO2≥6.7 kPa > 2% sleep)., Results: A total of 23 patients were included, median age 12.6 years (IQR 8.7-14.6). ODI>3/h was associated with higher breath and serum IL-6 (p = 0.02). Children with elevated CO 2 overnight had higher ICAM-1 and VCAM-1. CO 2 levels correlated with serum ICAM-1 (rs0.570, p = 0.026) and VCAM-1 (rs0.76, p = 0.001)., Discussion: SDB in neuromuscular children is associated with raised serum IL-6, VCAM-1, ICAM-1. This may predispose these children to future cardiovascular and other co-morbidities., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To evaluate safety and efficacy of oral posaconazole and terbinafine for Lomentospora prolificans and Scedosporium apiospermum in children with cystic fibrosis., Methods: Retrospective case review., Results: There were five children (four girls), median age 15.0 years; three had S. apiospermum and two had L. prolificans. Treatment duration: median 5 months (range: 5-18 m). In no patient was eradication achieved, with the follow-up range being 6 months to 4 years. Effect on lung function was variable but encouraging. No adverse effects were reported, one child had transient elevation of liver enzymes., Conclusions: While the combination therapy was well tolerated, it was unsuccessful at eradication., (© 2020 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Background: Approximately 30% of patients with the systemic autoimmune/inflammatory disorder systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) develop lupus nephritis (LN) that affects treatment and prognosis. Easily accessible biomarkers do not exist to reliably predict renal disease. The Maximizing SLE Therapeutic Potential by Application of Novel and Systemic Approaches and the Engineering Consortium aims to identify indicators of treatment responses in SLE. This study tested the applicability of calcium-binding S100 proteins in serum and urine as biomarkers for disease activity and response to treatment with rituximab (RTX) in LN., Methods: S100A8/A9 and S100A12 proteins were quantified in the serum and urine of 243 patients with SLE from the British Isles Lupus Assessment Group Biologics Register (BILAG-BR) study and 48 controls matched for age using Meso Scale Discovery's technology to determine whether they perform as biomarkers for active LN and/or may be used to predict response to treatment with RTX. Renal disease activity and response to treatment was based on BILAG-BR scores and changes in response to treatment., Results: Serum S100A12 (p<0.001), and serum and urine S100A8/A9 (p<0.001) levels are elevated in patients with SLE. While serum and urine S100 levels do not correlate with global disease activity (SLE Disease Activity Index), levels in urine and urine/serum ratios are elevated in patients with active LN. S100 proteins perform better as biomarkers for active LN involvement in patients with SLE who tested positive for anti-double-stranded DNA antibodies. Binary logistic regression and area under the curve analyses suggest the combination of serum S100A8/A9 and S100A12 can predict response to RTX treatment in LN after 6 months., Conclusions: Findings from this study show promise for clinical application of S100 proteins to predict active renal disease in SLE and response to treatment with RTX., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.)

Background: The lung clearance index (LCI), derived from the Multiple Breath Washout (MBW) test, is sensitive to treatment effects and compared with spirometry has higher feasibility in younger children and requires smaller sample sizes. As a result, the LCI has been endorsed by the European CF Society Clinical Trials Network for use as a primary outcome measure in CF clinical trials., Methods: Here we describe the implementation of standardised protocols for MBW test performance, data collection and quality control to successfully incorporate LCI as a novel outcome measure in a large multicentre phase III clinical trial., Results: Three regional (North America (NA), Europe (EU), Australia (AUS)) central over-reading centres (CORC) were established to provide a collaborative platform for MBW training, certification and quality control of data. One hundred and thirty-two naïve operators from 53 sites across NA, EU and AUS were successfully trained and certified to perform MBW testing.  Incorporation of a re-screening opportunity in the study protocol resulted a final screening feasibility rate of 93%, success remained high throughout the study resulting in an overall feasibility of MBW study data of 88.1% (1107/1257). MBW test acceptability was similar between geographical regions: NA (88%), EU (89%) and AUS (89%)., Conclusion: With this approach we achieved high MBW test feasibility and sustained collection of good quality data, demonstrating the utility of LCI as an effective primary endpoint in the first international phase III clinical trial to report LCI as the primary outcome., (Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier B.V.)