Search

Background: The Sarcoidosis Diagnostic Score (SDS) system has been established for sarcoidosis patients based on the WASOG organ involvement criteria. We evaluated modifications of the SDS system to determine if they improved its the diagnostic accuracy., Methods: Biopsy-confirmed patients with sarcoidosis seen during a 7-month period at 9 sarcoidosis centers across the world. Patients with non-sarcoidosis seen at the same sites were served as control patients. Comparing the SDS-biopsy and SDS-clinical values of five groups: duration of symptoms prior to evaluation (≤1 years vs.>1 years, ≤2 years vs.>2 years), organ involvement (lung, eye, or cardiac), race, and sex., Results: A total of 990 patients with sarcoidosis and 1011 controls were included in this study. The SDS-clinical was significantly more discriminating for those undergoing assessment with symptoms for more than one year (z-statistic=2.570, p = 0.0102) or two years (z-statistic=2.546, p = 0.0109). However, the addition of two points for both >1 years and >2 years since onset of symptoms did not increase sensitivity and specificity of diagnosis with the SDS system. The SDS-clinical cut-off for patients with ocular or cardiac disease was two points higher than that for lung disease. There was no difference in SDS-clinical or biopsy AUC values based on gender or race., Conclusions: The longer the duration of symptoms prior to diagnosis, the more likely the diagnosis of sarcoidosis was correct. For patients presenting with ocular or cardiac symptoms, evidence of multi-organ involved can improve the diagnostic accuracy of the SDS-clinical., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no competing interests., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.)

Background: Computational advances in artificial intelligence have led to the recent emergence of U-Net convolutional neural networks (CNNs) applied to medical imaging. Our objectives were to assess the progression of fibrotic interstitial lung disease (ILD) using routine CT scans processed by a U-Net CNN developed by our research team, and to identify a progression threshold indicative of poor prognosis., Methods: CT scans and clinical history of 32 patients with idiopathic fibrotic ILDs were retrospectively reviewed. Successive CT scans were processed by the U-Net CNN and ILD quantification was obtained. Correlation between ILD and FVC changes was assessed. ROC curve was used to define a threshold of ILD progression rate (PR) to predict poor prognostic (mortality or lung transplantation). The PR threshold was used to compare the cohort survival with Kaplan Mayer curves and log-rank test., Results: The follow-up was 3.8 ± 1.5 years encompassing 105 CT scans, with 3.3 ± 1.1 CT scans per patient. A significant correlation between ILD and FVC changes was obtained (p = 0.004, ρ = -0.30 [95% CI: -0.16 to -0.45]). Sixteen patients (50%) experienced unfavorable outcome including 13 deaths and 3 lung transplantations. ROC curve analysis showed an aera under curve of 0.83 (p < 0.001), with an optimal cut-off PR value of 4%/year. Patients exhibiting a PR ≥ 4%/year during the first two years had a poorer prognosis (p = 0.001)., Conclusions: Applying a U-Net CNN to routine CT scan allowed identifying patients with a rapid progression and unfavorable outcome., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest XG, SR, CF, MB, DIBI, JFB, DV, JCj, JMN, PYB have no conflicts of interest. MPD received fees (presentations or participation in expert groups) from Boehringer-Ingelheim. HN received fees from Roche/Genentech, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Galapagos., (Copyright © 2023 SPLF and Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Fibrotic pulmonary sarcoidosis (fPS) affects about 20% of patients. fPS carries a significant morbidity and mortality. However, its prognosis is highly variable, depending mainly on fibrosis extent, functional impairment severity, and the development of pulmonary hypertension. Moreover, fPS outcomes are also influenced by several other complications, including acute exacerbations, and infections. fPS natural history is unknown, in particular regarding the risk of progressive self-sustaining fibrosis. The management of fPS is challenging, including anti-inflammatory treatment if granulomatous activity persists, rehabilitation, and in highly selected patients antifibrotic treatment and lung transplantation., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

In this review, the infectious complications observed in sarcoidosis are considered from a practical point of view to help the clinician not to overlook them in a difficult context, as pulmonary sarcoidosis makes the recognition of superinfections more difficult. An increased incidence of community-acquired pneumonia and of opportunistic pneumonia has been reported, especially in immunosuppressed patients. Pulmonary destructive lesions of advanced sarcoidosis increase the incidence of chronic pulmonary aspergillosis and infection by other agents. Screening and treatment of latent tuberculosis infection are crucial to prevent severe tuberculosis. Severity in COVID-19 appears to be increased by comorbidities rather than by sarcoidosis per se. The diagnosis of infectious complications can be challenging and should be considered as a potential differential diagnosis when the exacerbation of sarcoidosis is suspected. These complications not only increase the need for hospitalizations, but also increase the risk of death. This aspect must be carefully considered when assessing the overall health burden associated with sarcoidosis. The impact of immune dysregulation on infectious risk is unclear except in exceptional cases. In the absence of evidence-based studies on immunosuppressants in the specific context of pulmonary sarcoidosis, it is recommended to apply guidelines used in areas outside sarcoidosis. Preventive measures are essential, beginning with an appropriate use of immunosuppressants and the avoidance of unjustified treatments and doses. This approach should take into account the risk of tuberculosis, especially in highly endemic countries. Additionally, parallel emphasis should be placed on vaccinations, especially against COVID-19.

Sarcoidosis is an independent risk factor for venous thromboembolism (VTE). However, the characteristics and clinical evolution of sarcoidosis patients presenting a VTE (sarcoidosis/VTE group) in the course of their disease are not known. Consequently, if VTE occurrence is associated with a more severe disease is still pending. We conducted a retrospective case-control study of sarcoidosis/VTE patients compared to matched sarcoidosis controls without VTE in two French tertiary centers, analysed and compared the clinical, biological, functional, imaging and evolutive profiles of the two groups. Sixty-one patients were included with at least one episode of VTE during course of sarcoidosis. At sarcoidosis onset (before/at the time of VTE occurrence) the number of affected organs, radiological stages and pulmonary functional tests were not significantly different between the two groups. In contrast, we found that sarcoidosis/VTE patients required more frequently a systemic immunosuppressive therapy (corticosteroids and/or immunosuppressors, 79% versus 58%; p = 0.008). The functional course was also poorer in sarcoidosis/VTE patients with a more frequent decrease in functional vital capacity (33% versus 18% in sarcoidosis/VTE patients and controls, respectively, p = 0.008). Finally, sarcoidosis/VTE patients presented more frequently with pulmonary hypertension (10% versus 1% in patients and controls, respectively, p = 0.006), and their survival was significantly worse (log-rank p <0.001). The occurrence of VTE during sarcoidosis is associated with a more severe disease and a poorer prognosis. The occurrence of VTE during sarcoidosis might signal a more inflammatory and/or evolutive disease in sarcoidosis/VTE patients and should be taken in consideration when designing therapeutic strategies for them., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare they have no conflicts of interest to report., (Copyright © 2023 SPLF and Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Sarcoidosis is a highly variable disease in terms of organ involvement, type of onset and course. Associations of genetic polymorphisms with sarcoidosis phenotypes have been observed and suggest genetic signatures., Methods: After obtaining a positive vote of the competent ethics committee we genotyped 1909 patients of the deeply phenotyped Genetic-Phenotype Relationship in Sarcoidosis (GenPhenReSa) cohort of 31 European centers in 12 countries with 116 potentially disease-relevant single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). Using a meta-analysis, we investigated the association of relevant phenotypes (acute vs. sub-acute onset, phenotypes of organ involvement, specific organ involvements, and specific symptoms) with genetic markers. Subgroups were built on the basis of geographical, clinical and hospital provision considerations., Results: In the meta-analysis of the full cohort, there was no significant genetic association with any considered phenotype after correcting for multiple testing. In the largest sub-cohort (Serbia), we confirmed the known association of acute onset with TNF and reported a new association of acute onset an HLA polymorphism. Multi-locus models with sets of three SNPs in different genes showed strong associations with the acute onset phenotype in Serbia and Lublin (Poland) demonstrating potential region-specific genetic links with clinical features, including recently described phenotypes of organ involvement., Discussion: The observed associations between genetic variants and sarcoidosis phenotypes in subgroups suggest that gene-environment-interactions may influence the clinical phenotype. In addition, we show that two different sets of genetic variants are permissive for the same phenotype of acute disease only in two geographic subcohorts pointing to interactions of genetic signatures with different local environmental factors. Our results represent an important step towards understanding the genetic architecture of sarcoidosis., Competing Interests: FB received from Boehringer Ingelheim, Fujirebio, Galapagos NV and Roche; personal travel support from Boehringer Ingelheim and Roche, board membership fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Fujirebio, Galapagos, GlaxoSmithKline, Roche and Takeda. DB grants paid to the institution from Synairgen and Sanofi; personal honoraria received from Chiesi, Norvatis and Sanofi; personal honoraria for lectures received from Astra Zeneca, Eli Lilly and Norvatis; not for profit activities for ministry of health, Romania. AF received a grant from the German Research Foundation. BF: received grants from Bristol Myers Squibb and AdVita Lifescience paid to the institution; personal honoraria for lectures from Boehringer Ingelheim, Astra Zeneca and Roche, personal travel support from Boehringer Ingelheim; reports a pending patient WO2020225246A1 and stocks from Relief Therapeutics. CG received lecture fees from Astra Zeneca paid to the institution. MK received consulting fees from Boehringer Ingelheim. JM-Q grants from German Research Council, Bristol Myers Squibb and AdVita Lifesciences paid to the institution, received personal honoria from AdVita Lifesciences and Roche, received lecture fees from Astra Zeneca and Roche, received payments for expert testimony from AdVita Lifescience; received travel support from AdVita Lifescience and Grifols, reports a pending patent WO2020225246A1 and stocks from Relief Therapeutics. MaP received grants from Palacky University paid to the institution. MiP reports fiduciary activities for Deutsche Gesellschaft für Pneumologie und Beatmungsmedizin. VP received personal consulting fees from Ambu and Erbe; lecture honoraria from Boehringer Ingelheim and Roche and participated in a data safety monitoring board for Boehringer Ingelheim. AP received personal consulting fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche, AstraZeneca and Galapagos, lecture fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, Norvatis and Gilead, participated in data safety monitoring boards for Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche and AstraZeneca and reports fiduciary activities for the European Rare Disease Network Interstitial Lung Disease Group and the steering committee of the World Association of Sarcoidosis and Other Granulomtous Disorders. SS reports grants from the German Research Council paid to the institution, personal consulting fees from Abbvie, Arenal, BMS, Biogen, Celltrion, Celgen, IMAB, Gilead, MSD, Mylan, Pfizer, Fresinius, Janssen, Takeda, Theravance, Provention Bio, Protagonist, Falk, Ferring, UCB, Amgen, Sandoz Hexal, Lilly, Galapagos. JCS grants from the German Research Council, Else Kröner-Fresenius Foundation, and Fritz Thyssen-Foundation paid to the institution; received personal lecture honoraria from Boehringer Ingelheim. LS received personal honoraria from Boehringer Ingelheim for educational events. D received personal honoraria from Boehringer Ingelheim for activities in advisory boards and lecture fees from Boehringer Ingelheim and AstraZeneca and reports travel support from Boehringer Ingelheim. WW grants from Roche, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Galapagos, consulting fees from Sanofi, Boehringer Ingelheim and Roche, honoraria for lectures from Roche and Beohdringer Ingelheim and payments for activities in data safety monitoring boards from Boehringer Ingelheim and Roche all paid to the institution. GZ reports a pending patent (EP 2585089 A1) and stock options for Moderna, Biontech and Relief Therapeutics. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2023 Freitag-Wolf, Schupp, Frye, Fischer, Anwar, Kieszko, Mihailović-Vučinić, Milanowski, Jovanovic, Zissel, Bargagli, Rottoli, Bumbacea, Jonkers, Ho, Gaede, Dubaniewicz, Marshall, Günther, Petrek, Keane, Haraldsdottir, Bonella, Grah, Peroš-Golubičić, Kadija, Pabst, Grohé, Strausz, Safrankova, Millar, Homolka, Wuyts, Spencer, Pfeifer, Valeyre, Poletti, Wirtz, Prasse, Schreiber, Dempfle and Müller-Quernheim.)

Lung transplantation (LTx) is a steadily expanding field. The considerable developments have been driven over the years by indefatigable work conducted at LTx centers to improve donor and recipient selection, combined with multifaceted efforts to overcome challenges raised by the surgical procedure, perioperative care, and long-term medical complications. One consequence has been a pruning away of contraindications over time, which has, in some ways, complicated the patient selection process. The Francophone Pulmonology Society (Société de Pneumology de Langue Française, SPLF) set up a task force to produce up-to-date working guidelines designed to assist pulmonologists in managing end-stage respiratory insufficiency, determining which patients may be eligible for LTx, and appropriately timing LTx-center referral. The task force examined the most recent literature and evaluated the risk factors that limit patient survival after LTx. Ideally, the objectives of LTx are to prolong life while also improving quality of life. The guidelines developed by the task force apply to a limited resource and are consistent with the ethical principles described below., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest None., (Copyright © 2022 SPLF and Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Several reports have highlighted a potential role of autoreactive B-cells and autoantibodies that correlates with increased disease severity in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). Here we show that patients with IPF have an altered B-cell phenotype and that those subjects who have autoantibodies against the intermediate filament protein periplakin (PPL) have a significantly worse outcome in terms of progression-free survival. Using a mouse model of lung fibrosis, we demonstrate that introducing antibodies targeting the endogenous protein PPL (mimicking naturally occurring autoantibodies seen in patients) directly in the lung increases lung injury, inflammation, collagen and fibronectin expression through direct activation of follicular dendritic cells, which in turn activates and drives proliferation of fibroblasts. This fibrocyte population was also observed in fibrotic foci of patients with IPF and was increased in peripheral blood of IPF patients compared to aged-matched controls. This study reiterates the complex and heterogeneous nature of IPF, identifying new pathways that may prove suitable for therapeutic intervention., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: C. Taillé reports grants from GSK, Sanofi and AstraZeneca, advisory board participation and consulting fees from GSK, Sanofi, AstraZeneca and Novartis, lecture honoraria from GSK, Sanofi, AstraZeneca, Stallergenes and Novartis, and travel support from GSK and AstraZeneca, outside the submitted work. D. Valeyre reports travel support from ERS, ATS and CPLF, and advisory board participation with Roche and Boehringer Ingelheim, outside the submitted work. H. Nunes reports consulting fees, lecture honoraria and travel support from Boehringer Ingelheim and Roche/Genentech, and advisory board participation with Galapagos, outside the submitted work. W.K. Lim reports options and stock as part of employee compensation from Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, outside the submitted work. V. Cottin reports grants from Boehringer Ingelheim, consulting fees from Boehringer Ingelheim and Roche/Promedior, lecture honoraria from Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche/Promedior, Sanofi and AstraZeneca, travel support from Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche/Promedior and AstraZeneca, and advisory board participation with Actelion, Bayer/MSD, Roche/Promedior, Sanofi, Celgene/BMS, Galapagos, Galecto, Shionogi, Fibrogen, RedX and PureTech, outside the submitted work. D. Corkill reports support for the present manuscript from AstraZeneca/MedImmune, as a full-time employee. T. Mustelin reports grants from NIH, and consulting fees from Miro Bio, Kiniksa, Cugene, QiLu and ROME, outside the submitted work. M.A. Sleeman reports support for the present manuscript from MedImmune/AstraZeneca, and during the research was a full-time employee of MedImmune/AstraZeneca. B. Crestani reports support for the present manuscript from MedImmune/AstraZeneca; B. Crestani also reports grants from Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche, BMS and Translate Bio, consulting fees from Apellis, Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche, BMS, Translate Bio, Sanofi and Novartis, lecture honoraria from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche, BMS and Sanofi, travel support from AstraZeneca, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche and Novartis, and is the Vice President of the Fondation du Souffle, outside the submitted work. All other authors have nothing to disclose., (Copyright ©The authors 2023. For reproduction rights and permissions contact permissions@ersnet.org.)

Diagnosing pulmonary sarcoidosis raises challenges due to both the absence of a specific diagnostic criterion and the varied presentations capable of mimicking many other conditions. The aim of this review is to help non-sarcoidosis experts establish optimal differential-diagnosis strategies tailored to each situation. Alternative granulomatous diseases that must be ruled out include infections (notably tuberculosis, nontuberculous mycobacterial infections, and histoplasmosis), chronic beryllium disease, hypersensitivity pneumonitis, granulomatous talcosis, drug-induced granulomatosis (notably due to TNF-a antagonists, immune checkpoint inhibitors, targeted therapies, and interferons), immune deficiencies, genetic disorders (Blau syndrome), Crohn's disease, granulomatosis with polyangiitis, eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis, and malignancy-associated granulomatosis. Ruling out lymphoproliferative disorders may also be very challenging before obtaining typical biopsy specimen. The first step is an assessment of epidemiological factors, notably the incidence of sarcoidosis and of alternative diagnoses; exposure to risk factors (e.g., infectious, occupational, and environmental agents); and exposure to drugs taken for therapeutic or recreational purposes. The clinical history, physical examination and, above all, chest computed tomography indicate which differential diagnoses are most likely, thereby guiding the choice of subsequent investigations (e.g., microbiological investigations, lymphocyte proliferation tests with metals, autoantibody assays, and genetic tests). The goal is to rule out all diagnoses other than sarcoidosis that are consistent with the clinical situation. Chest computed tomography findings, from common to rare and from typical to atypical, are described for sarcoidosis and the alternatives. The pathology of granulomas and associated lesions is discussed and diagnostically helpful stains specified. In some patients, the definite diagnosis may require the continuous gathering of information during follow-up. Diseases that often closely mimic sarcoidosis include chronic beryllium disease and drug-induced granulomatosis. Tuberculosis rarely resembles sarcoidosis but is a leading differential diagnosis in regions of high tuberculosis endemicity., Competing Interests: The authors declare that this review was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2023 Valeyre, Brauner, Bernaudin, Carbonnelle, Duchemann, Rotenberg, Berger, Martin, Nunes, Naccache and Jeny.)

Intimal granulomatous angiitis is a facet of pulmonary sarcoidosis vasculitis that has almost been forgotten. Its observation may offer new understanding of the various patterns of pulmonary hypertension associated with sarcoidosis. https://bit.ly/3g6Ms76., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: F. Jeny has received payment or honoraria from Boehringer Ingelheim, outside the submitted work; and support for attending meetings from Oxyvie, outside the submitted work. D. Valeyre has received payment or honoraria from Roche, Boehringer Ingelheim and AstraZeneca, outside the submitted work; and support to attend meetings from Boehringer Ingelheim, outside the submitted work. The remaining authors have nothing to disclose., (Copyright ©The authors 2023.)

Background: We determine the benefit of pulsed methylprednisolone for improving kidney function in patients with sarcoidosis tubulointerstitial nephritis., Methods: We conducted a multicenter, prospective, randomized, open-label, controlled trial in patients with biopsy-proven acute tubulointerstitial nephritis caused by sarcoidosis at 21 sites in France. Patients were randomly assigned to receive a methylprednisolone pulse 15 mg/kg/day for 3 days, then oral prednisone (MP group) or oral prednisone 1 mg/kg/day alone (PRD group). The primary end point was a positive response at 3 months, defined as a doubling of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) compared with the eGFR before randomization., Results: We randomized 40 participants. Baseline eGFR before PRD was 22 mL/min/1.73m2 {interquartile range [IQR], 16-44} and before MP was 25 mL/min/1.73m2 (IQR, 22-36) (P = .3). The two groups did not differ in underlying pathological lesions, including mean percentage of interstitial fibrosis and intensity of interstitial infiltrate. In the intent-to-treat population, the median eGFR at 3 months did not significantly differ between the PRD and MP groups: 45 (IQR, 34-74) and 46 (IQR, 39-65) mL/min/1.73m2. The primary end point at 3 months was achieved in 16 of 20 (80%) PRD patients and 10 of 20 (50%) MP patients (P = .0467). The eGFR was similar between the two groups after 1, 3, 6, and 12 months of treatment. For both groups, eGFR at 1 month was strongly correlated with eGFR at 12 months (P < .0001). The two groups did not differ in severe adverse events., Conclusion: Compared with a standard oral steroid regimen, intravenous MP may have no supplemental benefit for renal function in patients with tubulointerstitial nephritis caused by sarcoidosis.Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01652417; EudraCT: 2012-000149-11., (© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the ERA.)

Introduction:   activity tracker device usage can help analyze the impact of disease state and therapy on patients in clinical practice.  factors such as age, race, and gender may contribute to difficulties with using such technology.  Objective: we evaluated the effect of age, race, and gender on the usability of the Fitbit OneTM activity tracking device in sarcoidosis patients and the impact of device on sarcoidosis patients' activity., Method: patients participated in a six-month prospective study where were asked to wear a Fitbit OneTM activity tracker daily. device usage education was provided at study enrollment.  weekly data download and submission reports to participating centers was required. patients were asked to complete a post-study questionnaire reviewing the motivation of the activity tracker on daily activity., Results: at three centers, 91 patients completed all study visits and the post study questionnaire with a mean age of 55 and 75% were female and 34% african american. accurate downloads occurred >75% of the time, regardless of age, race, or sex. results of the post-study questionnaire did not show a correlation between the likelihood of wearing the device and motivation to increase activity., Conclusion: using an activity tracking device to evaluate and/or correlated with quality of life (QOL) instruments may prove beneficial for gathering more data on patients.  age, race, and gender did not contribute to differences in usability among sarcoidosis patients.

Rationale: The Sarcoidosis Diagnostic Score (SDS) has been established to quantitate the clinical features consistent with sarcoidosis in a monocentric study. Objectives: We aimed to confirm the diagnostic value of SDS in a large, multicontinental study and to assess the utility of SDS in differentiating sarcoidosis from alternative diagnoses, including infectious and noninfectious granulomatous diseases. Methods: We included patients with biopsy-confirmed sarcoidosis at nine centers across the world. Patients without sarcoidosis seen at the same sites served as control patients. Using a modified World Association of Sarcoidosis and Other Granulomatous Disorders organ assessment instrument, we scored all patients for the presence of granuloma on biopsy, highly probable symptoms, and least probable symptoms for each area. Two sarcoidosis scores were generated: SDS Biopsy (with biopsy) and SDS Clinical (without biopsy). SDS Clinical and Biopsy were calculated for all patients. We calculated and compared the area under the curve (AUC) for SDS Clinical and Biopsy according to different diagnosis scenarios. Results: A total of 1,041 patients with sarcoidosis and 1,035 without sarcoidosis were included. The results for SDS Clinical (AUC, 0.888; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.874-0.902) and SDS Biopsy (AUC, 0.979; 95% CI, 0.973-0.985) according to AUC were good to excellent for differentiating sarcoidosis from alternative diagnosis. SDS Clinical was less discriminatory in males ( P  = 0.01) and in high tuberculosis prevalence centers ( P  < 0.001). However, SDS Clinical (AUC, 0.684; 95% CI, 0.602-0.766) and SDS Biopsy (AUC, 0.754; 95% CI, 0.673-0.835) were not sufficiently discriminative for noninfectious granulomatous diseases, but both SDSs could differentiate sarcoidosis from infectious granulomatous diseases. Algorithms were proposed for the SDS Clinical and SDS Biopsy to assist the clinician in the diagnostic process, and cutoff values were proposed for the SDS Clinical and SDS Biopsy, allowing the diagnosis of sarcoidosis to be safely confirmed or rejected in most cases except for noninfectious granulomatous disease. Conclusions: This multicontinental study confirms that both SDS Clinical and SDS Biopsy have good to excellent performance in discriminating sarcoidosis from alternative diagnoses. Differences in the AUC were seen for high tuberculosis prevalence versus low tuberculosis prevalence centers and for males versus females. Both SDSs had good discriminatory function for infectious granulomatous disease but failed in cases of noninfectious granulomatous disease such as berylliosis.

Background: Surgical lung biopsy is essential in the diagnostic algorithm of interstitial lung disease (ILD) of unknown cause. Safety concerns have been recently reiterated. This study prospectively assessed the yield of diagnosis and safety of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgical lung biopsy (VATS-LB) for ILD diagnosis., Methods: This prospective study, conducted in 6 ILD-referral Paris hospitals, included 103 patients with ILD. VATS-LB was proposed after initial multidisciplinary discussion. A final diagnosis was made after the procedure, during a second multidisciplinary discussion. The main outcome was to determine the final diagnoses and their proportion after VATS-LB. Other outcomes were the percentage of change in diagnosis and treatment propositions after VATS-LB and adverse events during 3 months after the operation, postoperative pulmonary function, quality of life, and pain., Results: A definite diagnosis was reached in 87 patients (84.4%), and 16 remained unclassifiable (15.6%). After VATS-LB, the hypothesized diagnosis changed in 65 patients (63.1%) and treatment changed in 41 patients (39.8%). One patient died of acute exacerbation. In-hospital complications were predicted by a shorter preoperative 6-minute walking test distance and by forced vital capacity lower than 77%. Postoperative quality of life was not modified at 3 months, whereas forced vital capacity decreased slightly. Postoperative neuropathic pain was revealed in 5% of patients at 1 month and in 2% at 3 months., Conclusions: VATS-LB dramatically changed preoperative hypothetical diagnoses and treatment in ILD of unknown cause, with good patient survival in ILD referral centers., (Copyright © 2022 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: The impact of common measures to assess sarcoidosis have not been compared longitudinally to outcomes that are meaningful to patients. We prospectively examined the relationship of baseline measurements of sarcoidosis status to outcomes of interest to patients longitudinally over 6 months., Methods: Sarcoidosis patients cared for at 6 US medical centers were "phenotyped" at baseline with measurements of pulmonary function, organ involvement, health related quality of life (HRQoL) instruments, and their anti-sarcoidosis treatment history. These patients were followed for 6 months by monitoring outcomes of interest to patients (OIPs) including steps walked, calories expended, sleep, HRQoL measures, workdays missed and health care utilization. For each baseline phenotypic measurement, patients were dichotomized into two groups above and below a specified cutoff value. The area under the OIP versus time curve was compared between these two groups., Results: The cutoff values for many baseline phenotypic measures distinguished the patients into groups with significantly different 6-month OIPs. The chosen cutoff for the patient global estimate of health status distinguished the most OIPs (13/15). The 6-min walk distance cutoff was associated with more OIPs than spirometric measures. All of the HRQOL measure cutoffs were associated with many OIPs, although most of them were other HRQOL measures., Interpretation: Cutoffs for most of the phenotypic measures used to assess sarcoidosis distinguished groups of sarcoidosis patients with differing OIPs over the subsequent 6 months. The patients' global assessment of their disease was the most accurate of these measures., Clinical Trial Registration Number: NCT04342403., (Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

Inorganic antigens may contribute to paediatric sarcoidosis. Thirty-six patients matched with 36 healthy controls as well as a group of 21 sickle-cell disease (SCD) controls answered an environmental questionnaire. Patients' indirect exposure to inorganic particles, through coresidents' occupations, was higher than in healthy and SCD controls (median score: 2.5 (0.5-7) vs 0.5 (0-2), p=0.003 and 1 (0-2), p=0.012, respectively), especially for construction, exposures to metal dust, talc, abrasive reagents and scouring products. Wood or fossil energies heating were also linked to paediatric sarcoidosis. This study supports a link between mineral environmental exposure due to adult coresident occupations and paediatric sarcoidosis., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Background: The use of cyclophosphamide in patients with acute exacerbation of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is unknown. Our study was designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of four cyclophosphamide pulses in addition to high-dose methylprednisolone in this population., Methods: In this double-blind, placebo-controlled trial done in 35 departments across 31 hospitals in France, adult patients (≥18 years) with acute exacerbation of IPF and those with suspected acute exacerbation of IPF were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio using a web-based system to receive either intravenous pulses of cyclophosphamide (600 mg/m 2 ) plus uromitexan as haemorrhagic cystitis prophylaxis (200 mg/m 2 ) at the time of cyclophosphamide administration and then again, 4 h later, or placebo at days 0, 15, 30, and 60. Random assignment was stratified according to the severity of IPF and was block-balanced with variable block sizes of four or six patients. Patients receiving mechanical ventilation, with active infection, with active cancer, or who were registered on the lung transplant waiting list were excluded. All patients received standardised high-dose glucocorticoids. The investigators, patients, and the sponsor were masked to the treatment assignments. The primary endpoint was 3-month all-cause mortality, analysed by a χ 2 test adhering to an intention-to-treat principle. The trial is now complete and registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02460588., Findings: Between Jan 22, 2016, and July 19, 2018, 183 patients were assessed for eligibility, of whom 120 patients were randomly assigned and 119 patients (62 [52%] with severe IPF) received at least one dose of cyclophosphamide (n=60) or placebo (n=59), all of whom were included in the intention-to-treat analysis. The 3-month all-cause mortality was 45% (27/60) in patients given cyclophosphamide compared with 31% (18/59) in the placebo group (difference 14·5% [95% CI -3·1 to 31·6]; p=0·10). Similar results were found after adjustment by IPF severity (odds ratio [OR] 1·89 [95% CI 0·89-4·04]). The risk of death at 3 months, independent of the treatment received, was higher with severe than non-severe IPF (OR 2·62 [1·12-6·12]) and was lower with the use of antifibrotic therapy (OR 0·33 [0·13-0·82]). Adverse events were similar between groups by 6 months (25 [42%] in the cyclophosphamide group vs 30 [51%] in the placebo group) and their proportion, including infections, did not differ. Overall infection was the main adverse event and occurred in 20 (33%) of 60 patients in the cyclophosphamide group versus 21 (36%) of 59 patients in the placebo group., Interpretation: In patients with acute exacerbation of IPF, adding intravenous cyclophosphamide pulses to glucocorticoids increased 3-month mortality. These findings provide evidence against the use of intravenous cyclophosphamide in such patients., Funding: Programme Hospitalier de Recherche Clinique of the French Ministry of Health (PHRC 2014-502), Roche Pharmaceuticals., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests J-MN reports grants from the French Ministry of Health and Roche, during the conduct of the study; personal fees from AstraZeneca and Boehringer Ingelheim; and non-financial support from Boehringer Ingelheim. SJ reports personal fees from Actelion, Association pour les Insuffisants Respiratoires de Bretagne, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers-Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi, Galacto Biotech, Genzyme, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, LVL Medical, Mundipharma, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, and Savara-Serendex; and received funding for clinical trials from Bellorophon Therapeutics, Biogen, Olam Pharm, and Pliant Therapeutics. RB reports grants from Boerhinger Ingelheim and Roche; and personal fees from Boerhinger Ingelheim, Roche, Sanofi, and SAvara. AB has received grants from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Cephalon/Teva, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, and Sanofi-Regeneron; has provided consultancy for Actelion, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi, GlaxoSmithKline, MedinCell, Merck, Novartis, Roche, and Sanofi-Regeneron; and has acted as an investigator or co-investigator for trials sponsored by Actelion, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi, Galapagos, GlaxoSmithKline, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi-Regeneron, and Vertex. PB reports personal fees from AstraZeneca, Boehringer, Chiesi, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi, Stallergene, and Teva. SM-A reports personal fees from Boerhinger Ingelheim and Roche. FG reports grants from Resmed; personal fees from Actelion, Cidelec, Novartis, Nyxoah, Resmed, and Sefam; and non-financial support from Asten, Boehringer Ingelheim, Novartis, Nyxoah, and Sefam. SD reports personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim. AT reports personal fees from Bristol Myers Squibb and Chiesi; and travel accomodation fees from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Teva, and Vitalaire. PYB reports grants from Laboratoire Boehringer Ingelheim and Laboratoire Roche; and personal fees from Laboratoire Boehringer Ingelheim and Laboratoire Roche. MPD reports personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim; and non-financial support from Roche. GB reports non-financial support from Boehringer Ingelheim France, Novartis Pharma, and Roche. LW-S reports personal fees from Bristol Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche, and Sanofi; and non-financial support from Boehringer Ingelheim and Roche. CC reports grants from Santelys; personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim; and non-financial support from Roche. DV reports personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim and Roche. BC reports personal fees from AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, Genzyme, Roche, and Sanofi; non-financial support from AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche, and Sanofi; and grants from Boehringer Ingelheim and Roche. VC reports personal fees from Actelion, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Fibrogen, Galapagos, Galecto, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Promedior, Roche, Sanofi, and Shionogi; grants from Boehringer Ingelheim; and non-financial support from Actelion, Boehringer Ingelheim, Promedior, and Roche. TS reports personal fees from AstraZeneca, Bayer, BMS, Novartis, and Sanofi; and grants from AstraZeneca, Amgen, Bayer, Boehringer, Daiichi-Sankyo, Eli Lilly, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, and Sanofi. HN reports grants from Boehringer Ingelheim and Roche/Genentech; personal fees from Actelion Pharmaceuticals, Boehringer Ingelheim, Galapagos, and Roche/Genentech; and was the investigator of a clinical trial for Galecto Biotech AB, Gilead, Novartis, and Sanofi, during the conduct of the study. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: The major reasons to treat sarcoidosis are to lower the morbidity and mortality risk or to improve quality of life (QoL). The indication for treatment varies depending on which manifestation is the cause of symptoms: lungs, heart, brain, skin or other manifestations. While glucocorticoids remain the first choice for initial treatment of symptomatic disease, prolonged use is associated with significant toxicity. Glucocorticoid-sparing alternatives are available. The presented treatment guidelines aim to provide guidance to physicians treating the very heterogenous sarcoidosis manifestations., Methods: A European Respiratory Society Task Force committee composed of clinicians, methodologists and patients with experience in sarcoidosis developed recommendations based on the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations) methodology. The committee developed eight PICO (Patients, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes) questions and these were used to make specific evidence-based recommendations., Results: The Task Force committee delivered 12 recommendations for seven PICOs. These included treatment of pulmonary, cutaneous, cardiac and neurologic disease as well as fatigue. One PICO question regarding small-fibre neuropathy had insufficient evidence to support a recommendation. In addition to the recommendations, the committee provided information on how they use alternative treatments, when there was insufficient evidence to support a recommendation., Conclusions: There are many treatments available to treat sarcoidosis. Given the diverse nature of the disease, treatment decisions require an assessment of organ involvement, risk for significant morbidity, and impact on QoL of the disease and treatment., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: R.P. Baughman reports grants from Gilead, Genentech, Bayer, aTyr and Bellephron, grants and personal fees for consultancy from Novartis, personal fees for consultancy from Methial, grants and personal fees for consultancy and lectures from Mallinckrodt, grants and personal fees for lectures from Boehringer Ingelheim, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: D. Valeyre reports personal fees for advisory board work from Boehringer Ingelheim and Roche, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: P. Korsten reports grants and personal fees from GlaxoSmithKline, personal fees from AbbVie, Pfizer, Chugai, Novartis Pharma, Sanofi-Aventis, Lilly and Gilead, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: A.G. Mathioudakis reports grants from Boehringer Ingelheim, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: W.A. Wuyts has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: A. Wells reports personal fees for lectures and advisory board work from Boehringer Ingelheim and Roche, during the conduct of the study. Conflict of interest: P. Rottoli has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: H. Nunes has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: E.E. Lower reports grants from Gilead, Genentech, Bayer and aTYR, grants and personal fees for consultancy from Novartis, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: M.A. Judson received grant support for his institution from Mallickrodt. Conflict of interest: D. Israël-Biet has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: J.C. Grutters has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: M. Drent has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: D.A. Culver reports grants and personal fees from aTyr, Mallinckrodt, Boehringer Ingelheim and Foundation for Sarcoidosis Research, personal fees from Roche, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: F. Bonella reports personal fees and non-financial support from Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche, Galapagos, BMS and Savara Pharma, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: K. Antoniou has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: F. Martone has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: B. Quadder has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: G. Spitzer has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: B. Nagavci acts as an ERS methodologist. Conflict of interest: T. Tonia acts as an ERS methodologist. Conflict of interest: D. Rigau acts as an ERS methodologist. Conflict of interest: D.R. Oullette reports grants from PCORI (Patient-Centred Outcomes Research Institute, US Federal) and Sanofi, outside the submitted work; and has provided expert witness work for venous thromboembolic disease., (Copyright ©The authors 2021. For reproduction rights and permissions contact permissions@ersnet.org.)

Objective: To study how demographic differences impact disease manifestation of sarcoidosis using the WASOG tool in a large multicentric study., Methods: Clinical data regarding 1445 patients with sarcoidosis from 14 clinical sites in 10 countries were prospectively reviewed from Feb 1, 2020 to Sep 30, 2020. Organ involvement was evaluated for the whole group and for subgroups differentiated by sex, race, and age., Results: The median age of the patients at diagnosis was 46 years old; 60.8% of the patients were female. The most commonly involved organ was lung (96%), followed by skin (24%) and eye (22%). Black patients had more multiple organ involvement than White patients (OR = 3.227, 95% CI: 2.243-4.643) and females had more multiple organ involvement than males (OR = 1.238, 95% CI: 1.083-1.415). Black patients had more frequent involvement of neurologic, skin, eye, extra thoracic lymph node, liver and spleen than White and Asian patients. Women were more likely to have eye (OR = 1.522, 95%CI: 1.259-1.838) or skin involvement (OR = 1.369, 95%CI: 1.152-1.628). Men were more likely to have cardiac involvement (OR = 1.326, 95%CI: 1.096-1.605). A total of 262 (18.1%) patients did not receive systemic treatment for sarcoidosis. Therapy was more common in Black patients than in other races., Conclusion: The initial presentation and treatment of sarcoidosis was related to sex, race, and age. Black and female individuals are found to have multiple organ involvement more frequently. Age at diagnosis<45, Black patients and multiple organ involvement were independent predictors of treatment., (Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

Background There are conflicting data regarding the diagnostic performance of chest CT for COVID-19 pneumonia. Disease extent at CT has been reported to influence prognosis. Purpose To create a large publicly available data set and assess the diagnostic and prognostic value of CT in COVID-19 pneumonia. Materials and Methods This multicenter, observational, retrospective cohort study involved 20 French university hospitals. Eligible patients presented at the emergency departments of the hospitals involved between March 1 and April 30th, 2020, and underwent both thoracic CT and reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) testing for suspected COVID-19 pneumonia. CT images were read blinded to initial reports, RT-PCR, demographic characteristics, clinical symptoms, and outcome. Readers classified CT scans as either positive or negative for COVID-19 based on criteria published by the French Society of Radiology. Multivariable logistic regression was used to develop a model predicting severe outcome (intubation or death) at 1-month follow-up in patients positive for both RT-PCR and CT, using clinical and radiologic features. Results Among 10 930 patients screened for eligibility, 10 735 (median age, 65 years; interquartile range, 51-77 years; 6147 men) were included and 6448 (60%) had a positive RT-PCR result. With RT-PCR as reference, the sensitivity and specificity of CT were 80.2% (95% CI: 79.3, 81.2) and 79.7% (95% CI: 78.5, 80.9), respectively, with strong agreement between junior and senior radiologists (Gwet AC1 coefficient, 0.79). Of all the variables analyzed, the extent of pneumonia at CT (odds ratio, 3.25; 95% CI: 2.71, 3.89) was the best predictor of severe outcome at 1 month. A score based solely on clinical variables predicted a severe outcome with an area under the curve of 0.64 (95% CI: 0.62, 0.66), improving to 0.69 (95% CI: 0.6, 0.71) when it also included the extent of pneumonia and coronary calcium score at CT. Conclusion Using predefined criteria, CT reading is not influenced by reader's experience and helps predict the outcome at 1 month. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04355507 Published under a CC BY 4.0 license. Online supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Rubin in this issue.

Background: The major risk factor for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), MUC5B rs35705950, was found to be associated with rheumatoid arthritis-associated interstitial lung disease (RA-ILD). Whilst the MUC5B rs35705950 T risk allele has been associated with better survival in IPF, its impact on RA-ILD prognosis remains to be determined. Our objective was to explore the influence of MUC5B rs35705950 on survival and progression in RA-ILD., Methods: Through an international retrospective observational study, patients with RA-ILD were genotyped for the MUC5B rs35705950 variant and consecutive pulmonary function tests (PFTs) findings were collected. Longitudinal data up to a 10-year follow-up were considered and analyzed using mixed regression models. Proportional hazards and joint proportional hazards models were used to analyze the association of baseline and longitudinal variables with lung transplant-free survival. Significant progression of RA-ILD was defined as at least an absolute or relative 10% decline of forced vital capacity at 2 years from baseline., Results: Out of 321 registered patients, 261 were included in the study: 139 women (53.3%), median age at RA-ILD diagnosis 65 years (interquartile range [IQR] 57 to 71), 151 ever smokers (59.2%). Median follow-up was 3.5 years (IQR 1.3 to 6.6). Mortality rate was 32% (95%CI 19 to 42) at 10 years. The MUC5B rs35705950 variant did not impact lung transplant-free survival (HR for the T risk allele carriers=1.26; 95%CI 0.61 to 2.62; P=0.53). Decline in pulmonary function at 2 years was not influenced by MUC5B rs35705950 (OR=0.95; 95%CI 0.44 to 2.05; P=0.89), irrespective of the HRCT pattern., Conclusion: In this study, the MUC5B rs35705950 promoter variant did not influence transplant- free survival or decline in pulmonary function in patients with RA-ILD., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest PAJ reports personal fees from BMS, outside the submitted work. JSL reports grants from NIH, personal fees from Genentech, personal fees from Celgene outside the submitted work. RB reports grants and personal fees from Roche, grants and personal fees from Boerhinger Ingelheim, outside the submitted work. LWS reports personal fees and non-financial support from Roche, personal fees and non-financial support from Boehringer-Ingelheim, personal fees from Janssen-Cilag, personal fees from Bristol-Myers-Squibb, outside the submitted work. RMF reports grants and personal fees from Roche Chugai, grants and personal fees from Abbvie, personal fees from Bristol-Meyers Squibb, grants and personal fees from Pfizer, outside the submitted work. YU reports personal fees from Roche, personal fees from Bohringer Ingelheim, non-financial support from Oxyvie, outside the submitted work. DV reports personal fees from Roche, personal fees from Bohringer Ingelheim, personal fees from Astra Zenecca, outside the submitted work. PJW reports grants from Genentech, grants from Medimmune, outside the submitted work. DAS reports grants from NIH-NHLBI, grants from NIH-NHLBI, grants from NIH-NHLBI, grants from NIH-NHLBI, grants from DOD Focused Program Grant, during the conduct of the study; other from Eleven P15, Inc., personal fees from NuMedii, Inc., outside the submitted work. In addition, DAS has a patent Compositions and Methods of Treating or Preventing Fibrotic Diseases pending, a patent Biomarkers for the diagnosis and treatment of fibrotic lung disease pending, and a patent Methods and Compositions for Risk Prediction, Diagnosis, Prognosis, and Treatment of Pulmonary Disorders issued. BC reports grants from Apellis, grants and personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, personal fees from Astra Zeneca, grants from MedImmune, grants and personal fees from Roche, personal fees from Sanofi, outside the submitted work. PD reports grants from PFIZER, grants and personal fees from ROCHE, grants and personal fees from CHUGAI, grants and personal fees from BMS, personal fees from ABBVIE, personal fees from MSD, outside the submitted work. JS, CvM, RG, FLS, JRS, MIGP, MM, IBR, RFV, EAO, EM, SAP, TK, DB, KMA, PS, AT, JJvdV, AJ, JG, CK, HN, NSK, MCB, CR, TS, TD, MPD, CB and RP have nothing to disclose., (Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Extrapulmonary sarcoidosis occurs in 30-50% of cases of sarcoidosis, most often in association with pulmonary involvement, and virtually any organ can be involved. Its incidence depends according to the organs considered, clinical phenotype, and history of sarcoidosis, but also on epidemiological factors like age, sex, geographic ancestry, and socio-professional factors. The presentation, symptomatology, organ dysfunction, severity, and lethal risk vary from and to patient even at the level of the same organ. The presentation may be specific or not, and its occurrence is at variable times in the history of sarcoidosis from initial to delayed. There are schematically two types of presentation, one when pulmonary sarcoidosis is first discovered, the problem is then to detect extrapulmonary localizations and to assess their link with sarcoidosis, while the other presentation is when extrapulmonary manifestations are indicative of the disease with the need to promptly make the diagnosis of sarcoidosis. To improve diagnosis accuracy, extrapulmonary manifestations need to be known and a medical strategy is warranted to avoid both under- and over-diagnosis. An accurate estimation of impairment and risk linked to extrapulmonary sarcoidosis is essential to offer the best treatment. Most frequent extrapulmonary localizations are skin lesions, arthritis, uveitis, peripheral lymphadenopathy, and hepatic involvement. Potentially severe involvement may stem from the heart, nervous system, kidney, eye and larynx. There is a lack of randomized trials to support recommendations which are often derived from what is known for lung sarcoidosis and from the natural history of the disease at the level of the respective organ. The treatment needs to be holistic and personalized, taking into account not only extrapulmonary localizations but also lung involvement, parasarcoidosis syndrome if any, symptoms, quality of life, medical history, drugs contra-indications, and potential adverse events and patient preferences. The treatment is based on the use of anti-sarcoidosis drugs, on treatments related to organ dysfunction and supportive treatments. Multidisciplinary discussions and referral to sarcoidosis centers of excellence may be helpful for difficult diagnosis and treatment decisions., (© 2021. The Author(s).)

Background: Macrophages are pivotal cells in sarcoidosis. Monocytes-derived (MD) macrophages have recently been demonstrated to play a major role especially in pulmonary sarcoidosis. From inflammatory tissues to granulomas, they may be exposed to low oxygen tension environments. As hypoxia impact on sarcoidosis immune cells has never been addressed, we designed the present study to investigate MD-macrophages from sarcoidosis patients in this context. We hypothesized that hypoxia may induce functional changes on MD-macrophages which could have a potential impact on the course of sarcoidosis., Methods: We studied MD-macrophages, from high active sarcoidosis (AS) (n=26), low active or inactive sarcoidosis (IS) (n=24) and healthy controls (n=34) exposed 24 hours to normoxia (21% O 2 ) or hypoxia (1.5% O 2 ). Different macrophage functions were explored: hypoxia-inducible factor-1α (HIF-1α) and nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-κB) activation, cytokines secretion, phagocytosis, CD80/CD86/HLA-DR expression, profibrotic response., Results: We observed that hypoxia, with a significantly more pronounced effect in AS compared with controls and IS, increased the HIF-1α trans-activity, promoted a proinflammatory response (TNFα, IL1ß) without activating NF-κB pathway and a profibrotic response (TGFß1, PDGF-BB) with PAI-1 secretion associated with human lung fibroblast migration inhibition. These results were confirmed by immunodetection of HIF-1α and PAI-1 in granulomas observed in pulmonary biopsies from patients with sarcoidosis. Hypoxia also decreased the expression of CD80/CD86 and HLA-DR on MD-macrophages in the three groups while it did not impair phagocytosis and the expression of CD36 expression on cells in AS and IS at variance with controls., Conclusions: Hypoxia had a significant impact on MD-macrophages from sarcoidosis patients, with the strongest effect seen in patients with high active disease. Therefore, hypoxia could play a significant role in sarcoidosis pathogenesis by increasing the macrophage proinflammatory response, maintaining phagocytosis and reducing antigen presentation, leading to a deficient T cell response. In addition, hypoxia could favor fibrosis by promoting profibrotic cytokines response and by sequestering fibroblasts in the vicinity of granulomas., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2021 Jeny, Bernaudin, Valeyre, Kambouchner, Pretolani, Nunes, Planès and Besnard.)

Sarcoidosis is a multisystem disease characterized by the development and accumulation of granulomas, the hallmark of an inflammatory process induced by environmental and/or infectious and or genetic factors. This auto-inflammatory disease mainly affects the lungs, the gateway to environmental aggressions and viral infections. We have shown previously that genetic predisposition to sarcoidosis occurring in familial cases is related to a large spectrum of pathogenic variants with, however, a clustering around mTOR (mammalian Target Of Rapamycin)-related pathways and autophagy regulation. The context of the COVID-19 pandemic led us to evaluate whether such genetic defects may increase the risk of a severe course of SARS-CoV2 infection in patients with sarcoidosis. We extended a whole exome screening to 13 families predisposed to sarcoidosis and crossed the genes sharing mutations with the list of genes involved in the SARS-CoV2 host-pathogen protein-protein interactome. A similar analysis protocol was applied to a series of 100 healthy individuals. Using ENRICH.R, a comprehensive gene set enrichment web server, we identified the functional pathways represented in the set of genes carrying deleterious mutations and confirmed the overrepresentation of autophagy- and mitophagy-related functions in familial cases of sarcoidosis. The same protocol was applied to the set of genes common to sarcoidosis and the SARS-CoV2-host interactome and found a significant enrichment of genes related to mitochondrial factors involved in autophagy, mitophagy, and RIG-I-like (Retinoic Acid Inducible Gene 1) Receptor antiviral response signaling. From these results, we discuss the hypothesis according to which sarcoidosis is a model for studying genetic abnormalities associated with host response to viral infections as a consequence of defects in autophagy and mitophagy processes.

Background: Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is characterized by a male predominance. The aim of the study was to explore gender differences in a well-designed French multicentre prospective IPF cohort (COhorte FIbrose, COFI) with a 5-year follow-up. Methods: Between 2007 and 2010, 236 patients with incident IPF were included in COFI. Gender characteristics were compared using a t -test, Chi-squared test and ANOVA, as appropriate. Survival analyses were performed. Results: Fifty-one (22%) females and 185 (78%) males with an average age at diagnosis of 70.1 ± 9.20 and 67.4 ± 10.9 years, respectively, were included in the cohort. Women were significantly less exposed to tobacco smoke [never n = 32 (62.7%) vs. n = 39 (21.1%), p < 0.001] and to occupational exposure [ n = 7 (13.7%) vs. n = 63 (34.1%), p = 0.012]. Baseline forced vital capacity, % of predicted (FVC%) was significantly better in women compare to men (83.0% ± 25.0 v. 75.4% ± 18.7 p = 0.046). At presentation honeycombing and emphysema on CT scan were less common in women [ n = 40 (78.4%) vs. n = 167 (90.3%) p = 0.041] and [ n = 6 (11.8%) vs. n = 48 (25.9%) p = 0.029], respectively. During follow-up fewer women were transplanted compared to men [ n = 1 (1.96%) vs. n = 20 (10.8%) p = 0.039]. Medians of survival were comparable by gender [31 months (CI 95%: 28-40) vs. 40 months (CI 95%: 33-72) p = 0.2]. After adjusting for age and FVC at inclusion, being a woman was not associated to a better survival. Conclusions: Women appear to have less advanced disease at diagnosis, maybe due to less exposure history compare to men. Disease progression and overall survival remains comparable regardless gender, but women have less access to lung transplantation., Competing Interests: LS reports personal fees and non-financial support from Roche/Genentech, non-financial support from Boehringer Ingelheim, personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, outside the submitted work. HN reports grants and personal fees from Roche/Genentech, Boehringer Ingelheim, personal fees from Galapagos, other from Sanofi, Gilead, Novartis, Galecto Biotech AB, during the conduct of the study; personal fees from Actelion Pharmaceuticals, outside the submitted work. VC reports personal fees and non-financial support from Actelion, grants, personal fees and non-financial support from Boehringer Ingelheim, personal fees from Bayer/MSD, Novartis, personal fees and non-financial support from Roche/Promedior, personal fees from Sanofi, Celgene, Galapagos, Galecto, Shionogi, Astra Zeneca, Fibrogen, outside the submitted work. BC reports personal fees from Astra Zeneca, grants, personal fees and non-financial support from Boehringer Ingelheim, BMS, personal fees from Sanofi, grants, personal fees and non-financial support from Roche, outside the submitted work. AT reports personal fees from Chiesi, other from VitAlaire, Astrazeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, outside the submitted work. SM-A reports other from roche, other from Boehringer Ingelheim, outside the submitted work. SH reports personal fees from Roche, Boerhinger ingelheim, grants from CSL Behring, outside the submitted work. SD reports personal fees from Boehringer-Ingelheim, Chiesi, Roche, outside the submitted work. PB reports personal fees and other from Roche, Boehringer, Novartis, personal fees from TEVA, other from Chiesi, personal fees from AstraZeneca, other from Stallergene, outside the submitted work. RB reports grants and personal fees from Roche, Boerhinger Ingelheim, personal fees from Savara, outside the submitted work. CP reports personal fees from ROCHE, outside the submitted work. DV reports personal fees from Roche, Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche & BI, outside the submitted work. YU reports personal fees and non-financial support from Boehringer, Roche, grants, personal fees and non-financial support from Oxyvie, outside the submitted work. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2021 Sesé, Nunes, Cottin, Israel-Biet, Crestani, Guillot-Dudoret, Cadranel, Wallaert, Tazi, Maître, Prévot, Marchand-Adam, Hirschi, Dury, Giraud, Gondouin, Bonniaud, Traclet, Juvin, Borie, Carton, Freynet, Gille, Planès, Valeyre and Uzunhan.)

Study Question: In patients with sarcoidosis, past and ongoing immunosuppressive regimens, recurrent disease in the transplant and extrapulmonary involvement may affect outcomes of lung transplantation. We asked whether sarcoidosis lung phenotypes can be differentiated and, if so, how they relate to outcomes in patients with pulmonary sarcoidosis treated by lung transplantation., Patients and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed data from 112 patients who met international diagnostic criteria for sarcoidosis and underwent lung or heart-lung transplantation between 2006 and 2019 at 16 European centres., Results: Patient survival was the main outcome measure. At transplantation, median (interaquartile range (IQR)) age was 52 (46-59) years; 71 (64%) were male. Lung phenotypes were individualised as follows: 1) extended fibrosis only; 2) airflow obstruction; 3) severe pulmonary hypertension (sPH) and airflow obstruction; 4) sPH, airflow obstruction and fibrosis; 5) sPH and fibrosis; 6) airflow obstruction and fibrosis; 7) sPH; and 8) none of these criteria, in 17%, 16%, 17%, 14%, 11%, 9%, 5% and 11% of patients, respectively. Post-transplant survival rates after 1, 3, and 5 years were 86%, 76% and 69%, respectively. During follow-up (median (IQR) 46 (16-89) months), 31% of patients developed chronic lung allograft dysfunction. Age and extended lung fibrosis were associated with increased mortality. Pulmonary fibrosis predominating peripherally was associated with short-term complications., Answer to the Study Question: Post-transplant survival in patients with pulmonary sarcoidosis was similar to that in patients with other indications for lung transplantation. The main factors associated with worse survival were older age and extensive pre-operative lung fibrosis., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: J. Le Pavec has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: D. Valeyre has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: P. Gazengel has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: A.M. Holm has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: H.H. Schultz has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: M. Perch has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: A. Le Borgne has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: M. Reynaud-Gaubert has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: C. Knoop has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: L. Godinas has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: S. Hirschi has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: V. Bunel has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: R. Laporta has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: S. Harari has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: E. Blanchard has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: J.M. Magnusson has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: A. Tissot has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: J-F. Mornex has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: C. Picard has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: L. Savale has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: J-F. Bernaudin has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: P-Y. Brillet has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: H. Nunes has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: M. Humbert has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: E. Fadel has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: J. Gottlieb has nothing to disclose., (Copyright ©The authors 2021. For reproduction rights and permissions contact permissions@ersnet.org.)

Background: Low income, a known prognostic indicator of various chronic respiratory diseases, has not been properly studied in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). We hypothesize that a low income has an adverse prognostic impact on IPF., Methods: Patients were selected from the French national prospective cohort COFI. Patients' income was assessed through the median city-level income provided by the French National Institute of Statistics and Economic Studies according to their residential address. Patients were classified in two groups as "low income" vs. "higher income" depending on whether their annual income was estimated to be < or ≥18 170 €/year (the first quartile of the income distribution in the study population). The survival and progression-free survival (PFS) of the groups were compared by a log-rank test and a Cox model in multivariate analysis., Results: 200 patients were included. The average follow-up was 33.8 ± 22.7 months. Patients in the low income group were significantly more likely to be of non-European origin (p < 0.006), and to have at least one occupational exposure (p < 0.0001), and they tended to have a higher cumulative exposure to fine particles PM 2.5 (p = 0.057). After adjusting for age, gender, forced vital capacity at inclusion, geographical origin, and occupational exposure having a low-income level was a factor associated with a worse PFS (HR: 1.81; CI 95% : 1.24-2.62, p = 0.001) and overall survival (HR: 1.49; CI 95% : 1.0006-2.23, p = 0.049)., Conclusions: Low income appears to be a prognostic factor in IPF. IPF patients with low incomes may also be exposed more frequently to occupational exposures., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: "Sarcoidosis-like" paradoxical reactions to Antitumor necrosis factor α (anti-TNFα) treatment have been reported. The clinical presentations are varied, most of the time, with a relatively typical picture of mediastinopulmonary involvement. More rarely, isolated granulomatous locations from various organs are described, leading to difficulties in diagnosis., Case Presentation: We report a granulomatous cardiac valve location complicating etanercept treatment in a 26-years-old caucasian male with rheumatoid arthritis. The patient received leflunomide and low-dose corticosteroids, then etanercept was introduced because of persistent disease activity. He had no history of tuberculosis infection or contact, chest CT-scan was normal. At 3 months, he showed complete remission. After 6 months of etanercept treatment, the patient suddenly complained of headache with scotomas of the right visual field and vertigo, without fever. Cerebral MRI revealed 3 recent infarcts. Cardiac ultrasonography revealed a mobile mass on the posterior mitral leaflet. C-reactive protein level was 8mg/L, and all analyses were negative for an infectious agent. Leflunomide and etanercept were discontinued, and antibiotic therapy was started. Mitral valve resection and plasty were performed 2 days later. Histology of the valve revealed large non-caseating epithelioid granulomas with a suppurative-like necrotic center. After ruling out infectious endocarditis, sarcoidosis, rheumatoid valvulitis or lupus-like reaction induced by anti-TNF therapy, the diagnosis of a paradoxical reaction to etanercept was finally retained. Tocilizumab monotherapy was introduced to treat RA flare, no antibiotic preventive treatment was added. After 2 years, the patient was in remission., Conclusion: This case raises for the first time the possibility of a paradoxical adverse event with an isolated granulomatous reaction on the heart valve occurring with anti-TNF treatment, namely etanercept., (Copyright © 2021 Société française de rhumatologie. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

(1) Background: Systemic granulomatosis developed in a context of malignancy has already been reported. Our objective was to describe the clinical, radiological, functional, biological, and evolutive characteristics of sarcoidosis-like cancer-associated granulomatosis (SLCAG) and to compare them to those of sarcoidosis. (2) Methods: 38 patients with a biopsy-proven SLCAG developed after a diagnostic of malignancy were included. The control group consisted of sarcoidosis patients matched for age, sex, and radiologic stage. Clinical, biological, physiological, radiological, and outcome data were collected. (3) Results: The mean age of SLCAG patients was 51 ± 14 years. They were diagnosed within 15 ± 14 months of the cancer diagnosis (breast cancer most frequently). All SLCAG patients presented a thoracic involvement, extrathoracic locations were observed in 32% of subjects. SLCAG was more often asymptomatic than sarcoidosis ( p < 0.0001). During follow-up, systemic treatment was less often required in SLCAG than in sarcoidosis (58% vs. 32%, p = 0.04 respectively) and SLCAG were characterized by a significantly less severe progression profile according to the Sarcoid Clinical Activity Classification, with a complete recovery more frequent at 5 years ( p = 0.03). (4) Conclusion: This case-control study shows that SLCAG differs from sarcoidosis with a significantly more benign course. These results might argue for true differences in the physiopathology, which remain to be elucidated.

Background: A computational proteomic analysis suggested that SARS-CoV-2 might bind to hemoglobin (Hb). The authors hypothesized that this phenomenon could result in a decreased oxygen (O 2 ) binding and lead to hemolytic anemia as well. The aim of this work was to investigate whether the affinity of Hb for O 2 was altered during COVID-19. Methods: In this retrospective, observational, single-center study, the blood gas analyses of 100 COVID-19 patients were compared to those of 100 non-COVID-19 patients. Fifty-five patients with carboxyhemoglobin (HbCO) ≥8% and 30 with sickle cell disease (SCD) were also included ("positive controls" with abnormal Hb affinity). P 50 was corrected for body temperature, pH, and PCO 2 . Results: Patients did not differ statistically for age or sex ratio in COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 groups. Median P 50 at baseline was 26 mmHg [25.2-26.8] vs. 25.9 mmHg [24-27.3], respectively ( p = 0.42). As expected, P 50 was 22.5 mmHg [21.6-23.8] in the high HbCO group and 29.3 mmHg [27-31.5] in the SCD group ( p < 0.0001). Whatever the disease severity, samples from COVID-19 to non-COVID-19 groups were distributed on the standard O 2 -Hb dissociation curve. When considering the time-course of P 50 between days 1 and 18 in both groups, no significant difference was observed. Median Hb concentration at baseline was 14 g.dl -1 [12.6-15.2] in the COVID-19 group vs. 13.2 g.dl -1 [11.4-14.7] in the non-COVID-19 group ( p = 0.006). Among the 24 COVID-19 patients displaying anemia, none of them exhibited obvious biological hemolysis. Conclusion: There was no biological argument to support the hypothesis that SARS-CoV-2 could alter O 2 binding to Hb., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2021 Gille, Sesé, Aubourg, Fabre, Cymbalista, Ratnam, Valeyre, Nunes, Richalet and Planès.)

Sarcoidosis is a rare disease of unknown cause with wide heterogeneity in clinical features and outcomes. We aimed to explore sarcoidosis phenotypes and their clinical relevance with particular attention to extrapulmonary subgroups.The Epidemiology of Sarcoidosis (EpiSarc) study is a French retrospective multicentre study. Sarcoidosis patients were identified through national hospitalisation records using appropriate codes from 11 hospital centres between 2013 and 2016 according to a standardised protocol. Medical charts were reviewed. The phenotypes of sarcoidosis were defined using a hierarchical cluster analysis.A total of 1237 patients were included (562 men and 675 women). The mean age at sarcoidosis diagnosis was 43.5±13 years. Hierarchical cluster analysis identified five distinct phenotypes according to organ involvement and disease type and symptoms: 1) erythema nodosum, joint involvement and hilar lymph nodes (n=180); 2) eye, neurological, digestive and kidney involvement (n=137); 3) pulmonary involvement with fibrosis and heart involvement (n=630); 4) lupus pernio and a high percentage of severe involvement (n=41); and 5) hepatosplenic, peripheral lymph node and bone involvement (n=249). Phenotype 1 was associated with being European/Caucasian and female and with non-manual work, phenotype 2 with being European/Caucasian, and phenotypes 3 and 5 with being non-European/Caucasian. The labour worker proportion was significantly lower in phenotype 5 than in the other phenotypes.This multicentre study confirms the existence of distinct phenotypes of sarcoidosis, with a non-random distribution of organ involvement. These phenotypes differ according to sex, geographical origin and socioprofessional category., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: R. Lhote has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: I. Annesi-Maesano has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: H. Nunes has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: D. Launay has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: R. Borie has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: K. Sacré has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: N. Schleinitz has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: M. Hamidou has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: M. Mahevas has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: H. Devilliers has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: P. Bonniaud has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: F. Lhote has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: J. Haroche has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: P. Rufat has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: Z. Amoura has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: D. Valeyre has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: F. Cohen Aubart has a patent pending for IL-6 antagonists as a treatment of sarcoidosis., (Copyright ©ERS 2021.)

Sarcoidosis is a multi-system disease of unknown etiology characterized by the formation of granulomas in various organs. It affects people of all ethnic backgrounds and occurs at any time of life but is more frequent in African Americans and Scandinavians and in adults between 30 and 50 years of age. Sarcoidosis can affect any organ with a frequency varying according to ethnicity, sex and age. Intrathoracic involvement occurs in 90% of patients with symmetrical bilateral hilar adenopathy and/or diffuse lung micronodules, mainly along the lymphatic structures which are the most affected system. Among extrapulmonary manifestations, skin lesions, uveitis, liver or splenic involvement, peripheral and abdominal lymphadenopathy and peripheral arthritis are the most frequent with a prevalence of 25-50%. Finally, cardiac and neurological manifestations which can be the initial manifestation of sarcoidosis, as can be bilateral parotitis, nasosinusal or laryngeal signs, hypercalcemia and renal dysfunction, affect less than 10% of patients. The diagnosis is not standardized but is based on three major criteria: a compatible clinical and/or radiological presentation, the histological evidence of non-necrotizing granulomatous inflammation in one or more tissues and the exclusion of alternative causes of granulomatous disease. Certain clinical features are considered to be highly specific of the disease (e.g., Löfgren's syndrome, lupus pernio, Heerfordt's syndrome) and do not require histological confirmation. New diagnostic guidelines were recently published. Specific clinical criteria have been developed for the diagnosis of cardiac, neurological and ocular sarcoidosis. This article focuses on the clinical presentation and the common differentials that need to be considered when appropriate.

Rationale: Improvement of quality of life (QoL) in patients with sarcoidosis is an important goal of management. The King's Sarcoidosis Questionnaire (KSQ) and Patient Global Assessment (PGA) are instruments that have been used in sarcoidosis. Objectives: We defined the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) as the within-patient clinically meaningful change threshold and determined the MCID of KSQ general health (KSQ GH), KSQ lung, and PGA using both anchor and distribution methods. The discriminatory properties of these MCIDs relative to other QoL instruments were then determined. Methods: Patients with sarcoidosis recruited from six centers in the United States were prospectively studied. Initially and at 6 months, patients completed a series of QoL questionnaires, including the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ), Short Form 36 (SF-36), Fatigue Assessment Scale (FAS), Sarcoidosis Assessment Tool (SAT), KSQ, and PGA, and spirometry. For the anchor method, receiver operator characteristic curves were used to determine the MCID for improvement or worsening. The distribution method using half of the standard deviation was calculated for KSQ GH, KSQ lung, and PGA. Results: Of the 325 patients enrolled in the study, 271 completed the 6-month evaluation. At 6 months, approximately half of patients were worse and 30% were improved based on previously established MCID values for the SGRQ, SF-36, and FAS. There were no discordant cases. There were significant correlations between the KSQ GH, KSQ lung, and PGA and most parameters assessed. The best correlations were with the SGRQ, SF-36, and FAS, which have established MCID values. Using anchor analysis, we found that most of the domains of SGRQ and SF-36 were able to determine the significant MCIDs for all three variables. These MCIDs were similar to those determined by the half least square method. We propose an MCID of 8 for the KSQ GH, an MCID of 4 for the KSQ lung, and an MCID of 2 for the PGA because these values captured >90% of parameters studied. These MCID values discriminated between changes in other QoL instruments. Conclusions: The determination of MCID values for KSQ lung, KSQ GH, and PGA may prove useful for clinical practice as well as clinical trials.

Question Addressed by the Study: Methotrexate (MTX) is a key anchor drug for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) management. Fibrotic interstitial lung disease (ILD) is a common complication of RA. Whether MTX exposure increases the risk of ILD in patients with RA is disputed. We aimed to evaluate the association of prior MTX use with development of RA-ILD., Methods: Through a case-control study design with discovery and international replication samples, we examined the association of MTX exposure with ILD in 410 patients with chronic fibrotic ILD associated with RA (RA-ILD) and 673 patients with RA without ILD. Estimates were pooled over the different samples using meta-analysis techniques., Results: Analysis of the discovery sample revealed an inverse relationship between MTX exposure and RA-ILD (adjusted OR 0.46, 95% CI 0.24-0.90; p=0.022), which was confirmed in the replication samples (pooled adjusted OR 0.39, 95% CI 0.19-0.79; p=0.009). The combined estimate using both the derivation and validation samples revealed an adjusted OR of 0.43 (95% CI 0.26-0.69; p=0.0006). MTX ever-users were less frequent among patients with RA-ILD compared to those without ILD, irrespective of chest high-resolution computed tomography pattern. In patients with RA-ILD, ILD detection was significantly delayed in MTX ever-users compared to never-users (11.4±10.4 years and 4.0±7.4 years, respectively; p<0.001)., Answer to the Question: Our results suggest that MTX use is not associated with an increased risk of RA-ILD in patients with RA, and that ILD was detected later in MTX-treated patients., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: P-A. Juge has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: J.S. Lee reports grants from NIH, personal fees for advisory board work from Genentech and Celgene, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: J. Lau has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: L. Kawano-Dourado has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: J. Rojas-Serrano has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: M. Sebastiani has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: G. Koduri has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: E. Matteson has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: K. Bonfiglioli has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: M. Sawamura has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: R. Kairalla has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: L. Cavagna has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: E. Bozzalla Cassione has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: A. Manfredi has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: M. Mejia has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: P. Rodríguez-Henriquez has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: M.I. González Pérez has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: R. Falfán-Valencia has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: I. Buendia-Roldán has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: G. Pérez-Rubio has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: E. Ebstein reports personal fees from Sanofi, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: S. Gazal has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: R. Borie reports grants and personal fees for lectures from Roche and Boehringer Ingelheim, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: S. Ottaviani has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: C. Kannengiesser has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: B. Wallaert reports grants and personal fees for advisory board work and meeting attendance from Boehringer Ingelheim and Roche, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: Y. Uzunhan reports personal fees from Roche and Boehringer Ingelheim, non-financial support from Oxyvie, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: H. Nunes has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: D. Valeyre reports personal fees for advisory board work from Roche and Boehringer Ingelheim, personal fees for lectures from AstraZeneca, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: N. Saidenberg-Kermanac'h has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: M-C. Boissier has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: L. Wemeau-Stervinou reports personal fees for lectures and travel support from Roche, personal fees for lectures and advisory board work, and travel support from Boehringer-Ingelheim, personal fees for lectures from Janssen-Cilag and Bristol-Myers-Squibb, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: R.M. Flipo reports grants and personal fees from Roche Chugai, Abbvie and Pfizer, personal fees from Bristol-Meyers Squibb, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: S. Marchand-Adam reports fees for research, lectures, meeting attendance, consultancy and advisory board work from Roche, Boehringer Ingelheim and Novartis, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: P. Richette reports personal fees from Ipsen/Menarini, AstraZeneca, Savient and Grünenthal, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: Y. Allanore reports personal fees from Actelion, Bayer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Boehringer and Inventiva, grants from Sanofi and Roche, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: C. Dromer has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: M-E. Truchetet has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: C. Richez has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: T. Schaeverbeke has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: H. Lioté has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: G. Thabut reports personal fees from AstraZeneca, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: K.D. Deane has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: J. Solomon has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: T. Doyle has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: J.H. Ryu has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: I. Rosas reports personal fees for advisory board work from Genentech, Boehringer and Three Lakes Partners, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: V.M. Holers reports grants from NIH/NIAID (U01 Grant), during the conduct of the study. Conflict of interest: C. Boileau has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: M-P. Debray reports personal fees and non-financial support for travel to meetings from Boehringer Ingelheim and Roche, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: R. Porcher has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: D.A. Schwartz reports grants from NIH-NHLBI (P01 HL092870, R01 HL097163, R33 HL120770 and UH2 HL123442) and DOD Focused Program (W81XWH-17-1-0597), during the conduct of the study; personal fees for consultancy and advisory board work from NuMedii, Inc., and is an employee of Eleven P15, Inc., outside the submitted work; and has a patent Compositions and Methods of Treating or Preventing Fibrotic Diseases pending, a patent Biomarkers for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Fibrotic Lung Disease pending, and a patent Methods and Compositions for Risk Prediction, Diagnosis, Prognosis, and Treatment of Pulmonary Disorders issued. Conflict of interest: R. Vassallo reports grants from Pfizer, Bristol-Myers-Squibb and SunPharma, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: B. Crestani reports grants from Apellis and MedImmune, grants and personal fees for lectures from Boehringer Ingelheim and Roche, personal fees for lectures from AstraZeneca and Sanofi, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: P. Dieudé reports fees for consultancy from Pfizer, Abbvie and MSD, grants and personal fees for consultancy and lectures from Roche, Chugai and BMS, outside the submitted work., (Copyright ©ERS 2021.)

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and mainly affects the lungs. Sarcoidosis is an autoinflammatory disease characterized by the diffusion of granulomas in the lungs and other organs. Here, we discuss how the two diseases might involve some common mechanistic cellular pathways around the regulation of autophagy., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Hepatic sarcoidosis is a relatively common manifestation of extrapulmonary sarcoidosis. It occurs in 20 to 30% of cases and is rarely severe. However, a cluster of patients may develop severe complications such as cirrhosis and portal hypertension. In this review, we describe the current knowledge of clinical, biological, pathological, and radiological features of liver involvement in sarcoidosis and discuss essential clues for management and treatment., Competing Interests: None declared., (Thieme. All rights reserved.)

Purpose of Review: Mortality in patients with sarcoidosis has primarily been attributed to advanced pulmonary sarcoidosis. This review aims to provide an update on recent clinical studies that help to better phenotype these patients, discuss new treatment options, and suggest areas where additional research is needed., Recent Findings: Diagnosis and management of advanced pulmonary sarcoidosis has changed as new technologies and treatment options have emerged. Clinical phenotypes of advanced disease have evolved to show overlap in presentation with other interstitial lung diseases. Assessment involves more advanced imaging modalities. New promising treatment options are being studied. Pulmonary rehabilitation and lung transplantation are being utilized to improve health-related quality of life and survival., Summary: Patients with advanced pulmonary fibrosis can have variable clinical, radiographic, histopathologic presentation. Given the poor health-related quality of life and high rates of mortality, medical therapy and pulmonary rehabilitation may benefit these patients. Lung transplantation should be considered in those with end-stage disease.

Background: There is a documented association between drug exposure and sarcoidosis-like reactions. In this study, we used the largest pharmacovigilance database to describe drug-induced sarcoidosis., Methods: Data were collected from the World Health Organization (WHO) pharmacovigilance database (VigiBase). We excluded steroids and vaccines from the analysis. The primary end-point was the lower end-point of the 95% credibility interval for the information component (IC 025 )., Results: A total of 127 reports had significant IC 025 values for drug-induced sarcoidosis, and 110 were included in the final analysis, accounting for 2425 adverse drug reactions. Overall, 2074 (85.5%) reactions were considered 'serious' and 86 (3.5%) were fatal. Most of the drugs that led to sarcoidosis adverse reactions were TNF-alpha antagonists, interferon or peg-interferon therapeutics, and immune checkpoint inhibitors. Other biologic drugs were less frequently associated with sarcoidosis adverse events. Cancer-targeted therapies such as BRAF or MEK inhibitors were associated with sarcoidosis reactions in 37 cases. Pulmonary hypertension drugs were also reported for drug-induced sarcoidosis. Amongst the 55 drugs considered as potential sarcoidosis inducers, 25 (45.4%) were never reported in Medline as drug-induced sarcoidosis., Conclusions: We provide a detailed list of suspected drugs associated with drug-induced sarcoidosis that will improve the recognition of this drug-induced adverse event., (© 2019 The Association for the Publication of the Journal of Internal Medicine.)

Sarcoidosis is a complex disease that belongs to the vast group of autoinflammatory disorders, but the etiological mechanisms of which are not known. At the crosstalk of environmental, infectious, and genetic factors, sarcoidosis is a multifactorial disease that requires a multidisciplinary approach for which genetic research, in particular, next generation sequencing (NGS) tools, has made it possible to identify new pathways and propose mechanistic hypotheses. Codified treatments for the disease cannot always respond to the most progressive forms and the identification of new genetic and metabolic tracks is a challenge for the future management of the most severe patients. Here, we review the current knowledge regarding the genes identified by both genome wide association studies (GWAS) and whole exome sequencing (WES), as well the connection of these pathways with the current research on sarcoidosis immune-related disorders.