151. Teaching to Test or Communicate
- Author
-
Younes Audeh, Mohammad Al Ghafri, and Muhieddin Al-Gadallah
- Subjects
Teaching method ,impose ,curriculum ,Rote learning ,administration ,Mathematics education ,medicine ,Curriculum ,Teaching to the test ,lcsh:LC8-6691 ,Disappointment ,lcsh:English language ,Cloze test ,Middle East ,lcsh:Special aspects of education ,cloze test ,hinder ,SocArXiv|Arts and Humanities ,General Medicine ,Communicative language teaching ,anxiety ,communicative approach ,Viewpoints ,SocArXiv|Arts and Humanities|English Language and Literature ,Test (assessment) ,bepress|Arts and Humanities|English Language and Literature ,promote ,reformation ,lcsh:PE1-3729 ,medicine.symptom ,Psychology ,Outcome-based education ,old-fashioned ,bepress|Arts and Humanities - Abstract
This study addresses the controversial question of which is more effective; teaching to the test, or teaching to communicate. It also highlights the viewpoints of some scholars about tests in different regions of the world; the Middle East and the West. The content of the research embedded in this article shows that there are a number of teachers who still believe in teaching to test following the traditional method, while some others think tests -especially in the elementary phase- cause anxiety, chaos and disappointment, and should be ruled out as a means of assessing students. In the Arab World, tests are still considered the main criterion by which students prove eligible to move to upper classes and get admitted to university programs. To provide the readers with a more concrete grasp of the discussed viewpoints, a questionnaire has been distributed among sixty-five male and female students taking English courses in the Foundation Program at Ibri College of Applied Sciences- the Sultanate of Oman. The results, implications, and applications will be discussed throughout this article while tackling the two major controversial issues: teaching to test or communicate.
- Published
- 2019