151. Multimodality imaging-guided left ventricular lead placement in cardiac resynchronization therapy: a randomized controlled trial
- Author
-
Bjarne L. Nørgaard, Christian Gerdes, Peter Thomas Mortensen, Jesper Møller Jensen, Kirsten Bouchelouche, Henrik Jensen, Steen Hvitfeldt Poulsen, Jens Cosedis Nielsen, Anders Sommer, Mads Brix Kronborg, Jens Kristensen, and Morten Bøttcher
- Subjects
medicine.medical_specialty ,medicine.diagnostic_test ,business.industry ,medicine.medical_treatment ,Venography ,Cardiac resynchronization therapy ,Speckle tracking echocardiography ,030204 cardiovascular system & hematology ,medicine.disease ,law.invention ,03 medical and health sciences ,Myocardial perfusion imaging ,0302 clinical medicine ,Randomized controlled trial ,law ,Internal medicine ,Heart failure ,Clinical endpoint ,Cardiology ,Medicine ,030212 general & internal medicine ,Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine ,business ,Coronary sinus - Abstract
Aim Left ventricular (LV) lead position at the latest mechanically activated non-scarred myocardial LV region confers improved response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). We conducted a double-blind, randomized controlled trial to evaluate the clinical benefit of multimodality imaging-guided LV lead placement in CRT. Methods and results Patients were allocated (1:1) to imaging-guided LV lead placement using cardiac computed tomography (CT) venography, 99mTechnetium myocardial perfusion imaging, and speckle-tracking echocardiography radial strain to target the optimal coronary sinus (CS) branch closest to the non-scarred myocardial segment with latest mechanical activation (imaging group, n = 89) or to routine LV lead implantation in a posterolateral region with late electrical activation (control group, n = 93). The primary endpoint was clinical non-response to CRT [≥1 of the following after 6 months: (1) death, (2) heart failure hospitalization, or (3) no improvement in New York Heart Association class and
- Published
- 2016