151. Comparison of Equations to Predict Energy Requirements With Indirect Calorimetry in Hospitalized Patients
- Author
-
Ana Caroline da Silva Oliveira, Nara Nayane Brito Menezes, Juliana Teixeira da Silva, Carolina Cunha de Oliveira, Monique Tavares de Jesus, Fernanda Noronha de Gois, and Larissa Menezes Santos
- Subjects
Male ,030309 nutrition & dietetics ,Intraclass correlation ,Rest ,Concordance ,Medicine (miscellaneous) ,Body Mass Index ,Degree (temperature) ,law.invention ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,law ,Statistics ,medicine ,Humans ,Resting energy expenditure ,Mathematics ,0303 health sciences ,Nutrition and Dietetics ,Harris–Benedict equation ,Nutritional Requirements ,Calorimetry, Indirect ,Gold standard (test) ,Intensive care unit ,Female ,030211 gastroenterology & hepatology ,Basal Metabolism ,Underweight ,medicine.symptom ,Energy Metabolism - Abstract
The accuracy of methods to determine resting energy expenditure (REE) contributes towards the adequate provision of nutritional support to hospitalized patients. Indirect calorimetry (IC) is considered the gold standard method to determine REE. The aim of this study is evaluated the degree of agreement between the REE measured by IC (REE-IC) and REE estimated by predictive equations in the intensive care unit patients, showing which could be used as an alternative METHODS: : The sample is made up of intensive care unit patients over the age of 18, both male and female, and undergoing nutritional therapy. The predictive equations to estimate REE was the Harris Benedict (HB), Ireton Jones (IJ) and practical method (PM). Degree of agreement between REE-predictive equations and REE-IC was analyzed by the interclass correlation coefficient and the Bland-Altman test RESULTS: : Average energy obtained by IC was significantly different from HB and IJ equations (p
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF