Search

A 63 year old male hypertensive and diabetic patient, with coronary artery and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, presented with bilateral both bone forearm fracture. Open reduction and internal fixation was done successfully with bilateral ultrasound guided supraclavicular block. The problems associated with peripheral nerve block in an Ischemic Heart Disease (IHD) patient on antiplatelet therapy are discussed.

Background and aim: Patients undergoing percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube placement often are under antiplatelet therapy with a potential thromboembolic risk if these medications are discontinued. This systematic review aims to assess if maintaining aspirin and/or clopidogrel treatment increases the risk of bleeding following PEG placement. Methods: A systematic search of the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and SCOPUS databases was developed for studies investigating the risk of bleeding in patients on antiplatelet therapy undergoing PEG tube insertion. Summary estimates, including 95 % confidence intervals (CI), were calculated. A fixed or random effects model was used depending on heterogeneity (I²). Publication bias risks were assessed by means of funnel plot analysis. Results: Eleven studies with a total of 6,233 patients (among whom 3,665 were undergoing antiplatelet treatment), met the inclusion criteria and were included in the quantitative summary. Any PEG tube placement-related bleeding was found in 2.67 % (95 % CI 1.66 %, 3.91 %) of the entire population and in 2.7 % (95 % CI 1.5 %, 4.1 %) of patients not receiving antiplatelet therapy. Pooled relative risk (RR) for bleeding in patients under aspirin, when compared to controls, was 1.43 (95 % CI 0.89, 2.29; I² = 0 %); pooled RR for clopidogrel was 1.21 (95 % CI 0.48, 3.04; I² = 0 %) and for dual antiplatelet therapy, 2.13; (95 % CI 0.77, 5.91; I² = 47 %). No significant publication bias was evident for the different medications analyzed. Conclusion: Antiplatelet therapy was safe among patients undergoing PEG tube insertion. Future prospective and randomized studies with larger sample sizes are required to confirm the results of this study.

Antiplatelet therapy plays a critical role in the prevention and treatment of major cardiovascular diseases triggered by thrombosis. Since the 1900s, significant progress in reducing morbidity and death caused by cardiovascular diseases has been made. However, despite the development and approval of drugs that specifically target the platelet, including inhibitors for cycloxygenase-1, P2Y 12 receptor, integrin αIIbβ3, phosphodiesterases, and protease-activated receptor 1, the risk of recurrent thrombotic events remains high, and the increased risk of bleeding is a major concern. Scientific advances in our understanding of the role of platelets in haemostasis and thrombosis have revealed novel targets, such as protease-activated receptor 4 (PAR4), glycoprotein Ib (GPIb)-V-IX complex, glycoprotein VI, and 12-lipoxygenase. The antithrombotic effects and safety of the pharmacologic inhibition of these targets are currently under investigation in clinical studies. This review provides an overview of drugs in early development to target the platelet and those in current use in clinical practice. Furthermore, it describes the emerging drug targets being developed and studied to reduce platelet activity and outlines potential novel therapeutic targets in the platelet., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interests M.H. is a consultant and equity holder and consultant for Veralox therapeutics and Cereno Scientific. M.H. is an inventor and holds patents for ML355 and CS585. All other authors declare no competing interests for the work reported in this manuscript., (Copyright © 2023 International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Cardiovascular disease, predominantly acute coronary syndrome (ACS), is the leading cause of death for both men and women. For decades, this has been a global healthcare challenge. The main reason for thrombus formation in the coronary arteries is platelet accumulation as part of an inflammatory reaction. The efforts to combat this process of platelet aggregation have led researchers to discover antiplatelet drugs, which have been a keystone in treating cardiovascular diseases related to arterial thrombus formation. Antiplatelet drugs inhibit various platelet responses and help mitigate atherothrombosis, thereby playing a major role in both primary and secondary prevention of ACS. This study employs a scoping review approach to recapitulate the data in the existing literature regarding the efficacy and safety of antiplatelet therapy in patients with ACS. By searching a total of 14,882 journals that were published between 2013 and July 26, 2023, 10 papers were selected for in-depth analysis. We conducted this literature search by using PubMed and Google Scholar databases and adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) and the corresponding PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews in performing this review.  The review findings revealed that the current approach of using antiplatelet agents in ACS is safe and efficient, provided that bleeding risk assessment is conducted and any prior contraindications are recognized before administering the drugs. Ethical approval was not required for this review as it involved secondary data collection from published journals. The findings of this scoping review will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at conferences., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist., (Copyright © 2023, Winson et al.)

Background: The efficacy and safety of antiplatelet drugs in the treatment of moyamoya disease remain unclear. This study reports results of a nationwide survey conducted in 2016 on the trends of antiplatelet therapy for moyamoya disease in Japan.Methods: Data were obtained through questionnaires related to treatment policies regarding antiplatelet drugs from each specialized stroke management department of 765 hospitals in Japan. Data were also compared between experienced facilities (defined as facilities managing more than 10 cases per year) and those less experienced (not more than 10 cases per year) to determine experts' opinion.Results: Of the 389 departments in 375 hospitals that responded, 330 departments provided medical care for moyamoya disease. Regarding ischemic stroke, numerous departments considered the use of antiplatelet drugs "in principle" (218 departments). After surgery for ischemic moyamoya disease, the use of antiplatelet drugs for a certain period of time was the most popular opinion (74 departments). Regarding asymptomatic moyamoya disease, majority departments reported no use of APDs "in principle" (256 departments). The experienced facilities reported "no use of antiplatelet drugs" more frequently than those less experienced for treating asymptomatic moyamoya disease. In moyamoya disease, aspirin was the most commonly used antiplatelet drugs followed by cilostazol and clopidogrel.Conclusions: This survey revealed details of treatment policies, and the selection of antiplatelet drugs widely varied across facilities. Further prospective studies are necessary to improve the current unclear situation regarding the use of antiplatelet drugs for the management of moyamoya disease. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A variety of laboratory tests have been developed, which can diagnose a number of both congenital and acquired disorders of platelet function. Many tests of platelet function measure the ability of platelets to adhere to each other, forming platelet aggregates, which represent the major constituents of hemostatic plugs and of arterial thrombi. Light transmission aggregometry (LTA) is still considered the gold standard of platelet aggregation tests, but other platelet aggregation-based tests are also available. Among them, the flow cytometry-based methods may be more convenient than LTA for the study of patients with very low or very high platelet counts. The use of platelet aggregation tests has also been advocated to monitor the treatment with antiplatelet agents (mostly the P2Y12 antagonist clopidogrel) of patients with thrombotic arterial occlusions, with the aim of improving their efficacy and safety. However, randomized clinical trials failed to show any advantage of this strategy; as a consequence, international guidelines now recommend against laboratory monitoring of antiplatelet therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Stroke is common in tuberculous meningitis (TBM), and aspirin has been shown to reduce mortality. A combination of aspirin and corticosteroid may be more useful in this condition.Aim: To evaluate the effect of aspirin and corticosteroid adjunctive therapy alone or in combination in determining the outcome of TBM.Materials and Methods: One hundred and fifty-three patients with TBM were evaluated from a prospectively maintained registry. The diagnosis of TBM was based on the clinical, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)/computed tomography (CT), and cerebrospinal fluid criteria. The baseline clinical, laboratory, and radiological findings were noted. All patients received the standard 4-drug antituberculous (rifampicin, isoniazid, pyrazinamide, and ethambutol) treatment. Group I patients received in addition, aspirin, in the dose of 150 mg daily; group II patients received aspirin 150 mg plus prednisolone 40 mg daily; and, group III patients received none of these adjunctive therapies. The outcome at 3 months was defined in terms of death or functional disability.Results: Group I had 44, group II had 50, and group III had 41 patients. The baseline characteristics of all these patients were similar, except in group II, where patients had more severe meningitis and focal deficits compared to the patients in group I and III. At 3 months, 32 (23%) patients died; 8 (18.2%) in group I, 9 (18%) in group II, and 14 (34.1%) in group III. There was insignificant survival benefit in group II (hazard ratio [HR], 1.55; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.96-26.49; P = 0.07). The three-month functional outcome and side effects were not significantly different in the three groups.Conclusion: Aspirin with corticosteroid adjunctive treatment seems to be beneficial in reducing mortality in TBM. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Journal of Modern Laboratory Medicine is the property of Journal of Modern Laboratory Medicine Editorial Department and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Platelet activation plays an important role in the development of sepsis. During sepsis, platelet activation leads to endothelial cell injury and promotes neutrophil extracellular trap and microthrombus formation, exacerbating septic coagulation and inflammatory reactions. The resultant induction or aggravation of disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) leads to organ damage. Antiplatelet drugs can inhibit coagulation and inflammatory reactions in models of sepsis, reducing damage to organ function. Clinical studies suggest that aspirin may improve the prognosis of patients with sepsis. In conclusion, antiplatelet drugs are promising agents that can improve the prognosis of sepsis patients and are expected to become a new line of treatment. However, further clinical studies are required for validation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

There are several new anticoagulants on the market that will impact perioperative care, including the use of these anticoagulant drugs in the setting of regional anesthesia. The ideal pharmacological agent would prevent pathological thrombosis and allow for a normal response to vascular injury to limit bleeding. At present, all antithrombotic agents have increased bleeding risk as their main side effect. We describe the different categories of drugs, e.g., antiplatelet, anticoagulant, and thrombolytic, with particular emphasis on the new drugs that have been introduced into the market. These agents can be evaluated by a number of methods including low-, medium-, or high-risk procedures and guidelines and best practice standards that have been published regarding the amount of time to wait after stopping the medication and before performing a procedure, e.g., the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine recommendations. The present investigation will also describe new reversal agents for anticoagulants and the implications of all these drugs for regional anesthesia. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Antiplatelets are widely used drugs that can prevent platelet activation and subsequent aggregation, inhibiting arterial thrombus formation that can contribute to the development of myocardial infarction and stroke. The use of antiplatelets for secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease is supported by a strong and compelling evidence base, with rigorous clinical trials supporting the use of varying combinations of antiplatelets for different indications. A sound understanding of how antiplatelets work is needed to promote their safe and effective use. This article briefly describes the process of platelet activation, aggregation and subsequent thrombus formation, and will discuss the mechanism of action of antiplatelets and their place in therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To study the possibility of using thrombin generation tests in platelet-rich and platelet-poor plasma for evaluation of dual antiplatelet therapy efficacy in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD), following percutaneous coronary intervention. Venous blood was analyzed from CAD patients aged 53-75 years who had undergone percutaneous coronary intervention with stenting within one year and had been receiving standard doses of clopidogrel and aspirin (75 and 75-100 mg per day, respectively). The control group comprised age- and sex-matched subjects without clinical signs of CAD who were not receiving these drugs. Thrombin generation tests were performed in platelet-rich and platelet-poor plasma. Intravascular platelet activation, induced platelet aggregation, and routine coagulation were evaluated. Antiplatelet treatment did not influence results of routine coagulation tests or intravascular platelet activation. The dual antiplatelet therapy affects collagen-induced platelet aggregation (44 ± 2.5 vs. 7.9 ± 2.6%, p = 10-7) and leads to decreases in endogenous thrombin potential (1900 ± 85 vs. 1740 ± 95 nM•min, p = 0.0045), maximum thrombin concentration (134 ± 9.5 vs. 106 ± 6.5 nM, p = 4•10-6), and increases in time to peak thrombin (27 ± 1.5 vs. 31 ± 2 min, p = 0.0012). Decreases in thrombin generation rate showed the highest statistical significance (13 ± 2 vs. 7.9 ± 0.8 nM/min, p = 10-8). Antiplatelet treatment did not alter thrombogram parameters for platelet-poor plasma. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Rotatory thromboelastometry (ROTEM®) is used for diagnosing and monitoring bleeding patients. Some of these patients receive antithrombotic treatment, thus having an increased risk of bleeding. Only sparse knowledge exists about whether the ROTEM® analysis is influenced by antithrombotic treatment. The objective of the present study was to examine if the ROTEM® results are affected in patients receiving antithrombotic treatment. This prospective observational study included patients receiving either vitamin K-antagonists (VKA), aspirin (ASA) or ASA combined with an adenosine diphosphate (ADP) receptor antagonist (ASA + ADP). ROTEM® analyses were performed using the standard assays EXTEM®, INTEM® and FIBTEM®. Furthermore, haemoglobin, platelet count, International Normalized Ratio (INR), activated partial thromboplastin time, fibrinogen (functional), creatinine, estimated glomerular filtration rate, and C-reactive protein were determined. The study included 231 patients receiving antithrombotic treatment and compared the results to ROTEM® previously collected data from 73 healthy subjects. The VKA (n = 73) patients had a consistently prolonged EXTEM clot initiation (p < .0001), which was significantly correlated to the INR (Spearman's r = 0.53, p < .0001). Additionally, the VKA patients had significantly reduced clot propagation [reduced maximum velocity, maximum velocity (MaxVel) and increased time to maximum velocity (MaxVelt)]. ASA (n = 80) and ASA + ADP patients (n = 78) revealed a prolonged clot initiation. ASA patients had decreased clot propagation (increased MaxVelt), whereas ASA + ADP patients had an inconsistent change in clot propagation (increased MaxVel and MaxVelt). In conclusion, VKA treatment was revealed by the ROTEM® analysis. On the contrary, ASA and ASA + ADP treatment were not consistently revealed by the analysis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The risks and benefits of antiplatelet treatment may be different in patients with chronic kidney disease, in whom tendency to thrombosis and bleeding hazards might be increased. Chronic kidney disease is also associated with poor response to antiplatelet therapy, and this represents a potentially important clinical problem in the setting of percutaneous coronary intervention and acute coronary syndrome. The use of new, potent P2Y12 inhibitors appears promising, although special consideration should be given to possible bleeding events. This review evaluates the benefits and harms of antiplatelet drugs in patients with chronic kidney disease.

The review provides the current information about the role of antiplatelet therapy in the cardiovascular prevention in patients with coronary artery disease and coronary revascularization. Recent drugs as components of dual antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous interventions are considered. The review includes features of antiplatelet therapy after coronary bypass surgery. The paper contains points of European and American recommendations. Authors discuss the controversial and unsolved issues of antiplatelet therapy. The necessity for new dosing forms synthesis and further research for development effective prevention of adverse cardiovascular events after coronary revascularization is noted.

Background: Platelet aggregation inhibitors (PAI) are among the most frequently prescribed drugs in older people, though evidence about risks and benefits of their use in older adults is scarce. The objectives of this systematic review are firstly to identify the risks and benefits of their use in the prevention and treatment of vascular events in older adults, and secondly to develop recommendations on discontinuing PAI in this population if risks outweigh benefits.Methods: Staged systematic review consisting of three searches. Searches 1 and 2 identified systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Search 3 included controlled intervention and observational studies from review-articles not included in searches 1 and 2. All articles were assessed by two independent reviewers regarding the type of study, age of participants, type of intervention, and clinically relevant outcomes. After data extraction and quality appraisal we developed recommendations to stop the prescribing of specific drugs in older adults following the Grading of Recommendations Assessment Development and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology.Results: Overall, 2385 records were screened leading to an inclusion of 35 articles reporting on 22 systematic reviews and meta-analyses, 11 randomised controlled trials, and two observational studies. Mean ages ranged from 57.0 to 84.6 years. Ten studies included a subgroup analysis by age. Overall, based on the evaluated evidence, three recommendations were formulated. First, the use of acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease (CVD) in older people cannot be recommended due to an uncertainty in the risk-benefit ratio (weak recommendation; low quality of evidence). Secondly, the combination of ASA and clopidogrel in patients without specific indications should be avoided (strong recommendation; moderate quality of evidence). Lastly, to improve the effectiveness and reduce the risks of stroke prevention therapy in older people with atrial fibrillation (AF) and a CHA2DS2-VASc score of ≥ 2, the use of ASA for the primary prevention of stroke should be discontinued in preference for the use of oral anticoagulants (weak recommendation; low quality of evidence).Conclusions: The use of ASA for the primary prevention of CVD and the combination therapy of ASA and clopidogrel for the secondary prevention of vascular events in older people may not be justified. The use of oral anticoagulants instead of ASA in older people with atrial fibrillation may be recommended. Further high quality studies with older adults are needed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives In this work, we further investigated the effect of the compound LASSBio-752 in thrombosis models in rats. Methods Arterial and venous thrombosis model, ex-vivo recalcification time and a PTT and PT. Key findings In the venous thrombosis model, oral administration of LASSBio-752 [48.2 mg (100 μmol)/kg] one hour before the thrombus induction decreased thrombus weight by 37 ± 0.2%. Interestingly, the antithrombotic action of this compound [48.2 mg (100 μmol)/kg] occurred at 87.5 ± 2.1% of inhibition after 24 h of administration and showed a lasting activity. When tested on the arterial thrombosis model, after a 1-h interval, there was already an increase in time to total occlusion of 34 ± 2.4 min, but the greatest effect was observed at intervals between 6 and 15 h of administration, when no occlusion of the artery was observed. The antithrombotic effect was reduced after 24 h when the occlusion time was 23.8 ± 2.3 min, close to that of the control, 17.6 ± 2.0 min. We also observed that bleeding was not excessive in any of the intervals tested. Conclusions Our results indicate that compound LASSBio-752 is a potential candidate for utilization in the treatment of thromboembolic diseases. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Anticoagulation using intravenous bolus administration of unfractionated heparin (UFH) aims to prevent thromboembolic complications in children undergoing cardiac catheterization (CC). Optimal UFH dosage is needed to reduce bleeding complications. We analyzed the effect of bolus UFH on activated clotting time (ACT) in children undergoing CC focusing on age-dependent, anesthesia-related, or disease-related influencing factors. This retrospective single-center study of 183 pediatric patients receiving UFH during CC analyzed ACT measured at the end of CC. After bolus administration of 100 IU UFH/kg body weight, ACT values between 105 and 488 seconds were reached. Seventy-two percent were within target level of 160 to 240 seconds. Age-dependent differences were not obtained (P = .407). The ACT values were lower due to hemodilution (total fluid and crystalloid administration during CC, both P < .001), with premedication of acetylsalicylic acid (P = .014) and low-molecular-weight heparin (P = .049). Arterial thrombosis (3.85%), venous thrombosis (0.55%), and bleeding (1.65%) following CC did not correlate with ACT values but occurred more frequently in children between 1 month and 1 year of age (91%). In conclusion, with a bolus of 100 IU UFH/kg, an ACT target level of 160 to 240 seconds can be achieved during CC in children in 72%, which is influenced by hemodilution and anticoagulant and antiplatelet premedication but not by age. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: We aimed to evaluate preoperative therapy and complications following phacoemulsification (PE) in subjects using anticoagulant/antiplatelet treatment. Materials and Methods: We included subjects using anticoagulant and/or antiplatelet treatment and who had undergone cataract surgery with PE using a clear corneal incision in the study. The age, gender, reason for anticoagulant/antiplatelet treatment, preoperative drug strategy and hemorrhagic complications were assessed. Results: The 158 patients (mean age 70.79±7.87 years; min-max 51-92 years) consisted of 80 males and 78 females. The anticoagulant/antiplatelet treatment consisted of acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) in more than two-thirds (69.62%), followed by clopidogrel (10.75%) and warfarin (9.49%). The treatment was continued before PE in more than 90% of patients taking ASA while most warfarin and clopidogrel users were started on temporary low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) treatment. Subconjunctival hemorrhage developed in 5 patients during surgery (2 patients using ASA, 2 using LMWH following warfarin and 1 with stopped clopidogrel treatment). Anterior chamber hemorrhage developed in 2 patients who were using temporary LMWH following warfarin. No complications were encountered in patients using Dabigatran or Rivaroxaban. Conclusion: PE surgery under topical anesthesia following antiplatelet use is safe. Safe PE can be ensured in warfarin users by temporary use of LMWH keeping the International Normalized Ratio at a therapeutic level. For patients using new generation anticoagulants, we recommend stopping the medication 24 hours before surgery to be continued 24 hours after the end of surgery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is an important and common cardiovascular risk factor. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the frequency of use of oral antiplatelet drugs (OAPs) and oral anticoagulant drugs (OACs) among the elderly with T2DM in Poland.Material and Methods: The study was based on the data collected in the Polish national PolSenior study.Results: Among 4979 PolSenior participants aged 65 and over, 883 (17.8%) had previously diagnosed T2DM. Among them, 441 (49.9%) used at least one drug in pharmacological cardiovascular prevention, i.e. OAPs (mostly ASA) in 405 (45.9%) cases and OACs in 38 (4.3%). The use of these drugs significantly depended on the sex (p = 0.02) and personal income (p = 0.05). Age, place of residence and level of education did not affect the prevalence of pharmacological prevention. Previous stroke and myocardial infarction were mostly associated with OAPs, whereas a history of atrial fibrillation (AF) was related to OAC treatment. Among participants treated with OAPs, therapy was applied as secondary cardiovascular prevention in 211 (52.1%) subjects, and as primary prevention in 194 (47.9%) subjects. Among participants treated with OACs, 24 (64.9%) persons had a history of AF. Secondary cardiovascular pharmacological prevention should be considered in 45 untreated participants (12.5%), and primary cardiovascular pharmacological prevention (SCORE ≥ 10 and/or AF) in 154 participants (42.7%).Conclusions: Cardiovascular pharmacological prevention in the elderly with T2DM in Poland seems to be unsatisfactory. Educational programmes concerning current recommendations for pharmacological cardiovascular prevention should be developed among general practitioners. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is an important and common cardiovascular risk factor. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the frequency of use of oral antiplatelet drugs (OAPs) and oral anticoagulant drugs (OACs) among the elderly with T2DM in Poland. Material and methods: The study was based on the data collected in the Polish national PolSenior study. Results: Among 4979 PolSenior participants aged 65 and over, 883 (17.8%) had previously diagnosed T2DM. Among them, 441 (49.9%) used at least one drug in pharmacological cardiovascular prevention, i.e. OAPs (mostly ASA) in 405 (45.9%) cases and OACs in 38 (4.3%). The use of these drugs significantly depended on the sex (p = 0.02) and personal income (p = 0.05). Age, place of residence and level of education did not affect the prevalence of pharmacological prevention. Previous stroke and myocardial infarction were mostly associated with OAPs, whereas a history of atrial fibrillation (AF) was related to OAC treatment. Among participants treated with OAPs, therapy was applied as secondary cardiovascular prevention in 211 (52.1%) subjects, and as primary prevention in 194 (47.9%) subjects. Among participants treated with OACs, 24 (64.9%) persons had a history of AF. Secondary cardiovascular pharmacological prevention should be considered in 45 untreated participants (12.5%), and primary cardiovascular pharmacological prevention (SCORE 埅 10 and/or AF) in 154 participants (42.7%). Conclusions: Cardiovascular pharmacological prevention in the elderly with T2DM in Poland seems to be unsatisfactory. Educational programmes concerning current recommendations for pharmacological cardiovascular prevention should be developed among general practitioners. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Preexisting anemia is associated with increased risk of mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction with persistent ST elevation (STEMI). However, its effect on the in-hospital course and cardiovascular complications associated with myocardial infarction remains uncertain. Our purpose was to evaluate the incidence of anemia and its role on early outcomes in patients with STEMI. We performed a retrospective analysis of 447 patients with STEMI, including 138 (30.9%) females, mean age 64.6 ± 12.1 years. Anemia was defined based on hemoglobin values on admission (< 120 g/L for females, < 130 g/L for males). Anemia was diagnosed in 68 (15.2%) patients (15.9% of males and 13.9% of females). The anemic patients were older (69 ± 12 vs. 63 ± 11 years, p < 0.0001) and had a lower BMI (26 ± 3.8 vs 28 ± 5.1 kg/m², p = 0.006), worse renal function (GFR 53.8 ± 25 vs. 68.9 ± 20 ml/min/1.73m2, p < 0.0001), higher hsCRP (42.5 ± 60 vs. 18.8 ± 34 mg/L, p = 0.005), lower LDL-C (2.9 ± 1.09 vs. 3.9 ± 1.18 mmol/l, p < 0.0001), but no significant difference in the values of HDL-C. Reperfusion therapy with PCI was applied significantly less in the anemic group -- 58 (85.3%) vs. 363 (94.4%), p = 0.009. Patients with anemia were admitted with signs of heart failure more often (36.6 vs. 23.5%, p = 0.03) and in-hospital worsening of hemodynamic status was also more frequent (38.2 vs. 20.4%, p = 0.003). In-hospital course was more complicated in the anemic group -- development of conduction disorders (30.9 vs 14.3%, p = 0.002), need of invasive mechanical ventilation (32.4 vs. 9.3%, p < 0.0001) or intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation (14.7 vs. 4.2%, p = 0.003) with similar incidence of arrhythmias or the need of renal-replacement therapy. There was no significant difference in the incidence of bleeding (19.1 vs. 14%, p = 0.27) as anemic patients were significantly less likely to receive oral antiplatelet drugs (aspirin -- 94.1% vs. 98.9%, p = 0.021; P2Y12 inhibitors -- 83.8% vs. 96.6%, p < 0.0001) with similar rate of administration of GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors (33.8 vs. 35.2%, p = 0.891). The overall in-hospital mortality was higher in the anemic group: 16 (23.5%) vs. 30 (7.9%) in non-anemic group (p < 0.0001). The mortality in the PCI-treated group was also higher in the anemic group: 8 (14%) vs. 20 (5.6%) in the non-anemic group (p = 0.04). Anemia on admission is associated with increased risk of in-hospital death and cardiovascular complications in patients with STEMI and should be treated as an additional risk factor. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Oral Antiplatelet Drugs (OAD) have a proven track record in the risk reduction of major cardiovascular events in patients with cardiovascular disease and normal kidney function. However, major gaps exist in our understanding of their effects on thrombosis and bleeding in chronic kidney disease (CKD). Clinical practice guidelines are ambiguous about use of such drugs in CKD patients, because patients with moderate to severe CKD were systematically excluded from clinical trials evaluating the efficacy and safety of OAD. Paradoxically, CKD patients are at high risk of thrombosis and major bleeding events. Thus, choosing the right combination of OAD for cardiovascular protection in these patients is challenging. Patients with CKD exhibit high rates of OAD hyporesponsiveness. It is, therefore, imperative to explore the mechanisms responsible for poor response to OAD in CKD patients in order to use these drugs more safely and effectively. This review explores suggested mechanisms of platelet dysfucntion in CKD patients and the available evidence on the efficacy and safety of oral antiplatelet drugs in patients with renal dysfunction. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims The aims of the present study were to assess antiplatelet drug use patterns after a first myocardial infarction (MI) and to evaluate the determinants of antiplatelet nonpersistence. Methods The present study was conducted in 4690 patients from the Utrecht Cardiovascular Pharmacogenetics cohort with a first MI between 1986 and 2010, who were followed for a maximum of 10 years. Medication use and event diagnosis were obtained from the Dutch PHARMO Record Linkage System. Antiplatelet drug users were classified as persistent users (gap between prescriptions ≤90 days), nonpersistent users (>90-day gap and no refills), and restarters (a new prescription after a >90-day gap). The association between potential determinants and antiplatelet nonpersistence was analysed using Cox regression. Results The proportions of persistent users decreased from 84.0% at the 1-year follow-up to 32.8% at 10 years for any antiplatelet drug, and 77.3% to 27.5% for aspirin; and 39.0% to 6.4% for clopidogrel at 6 years. Most nonpersistent users restarted antiplatelet drugs later, leading to 89.3% overall antiplatelet drug users at 10 years after MI. Diabetes (hazard ratio [HR] 0.44; 0.32-0.60), hypertension (HR 0.77; 0.60-0.99), hypercholesterolaemia (HR 0.49; 0.39-0.62) and more recent MI diagnosis period (2003-2007: HR 0.69, 0.61-0.79; 2008-2010: HR 0.38, 0.19-0.77, compared to ≤ 2002 period) lowered the risk of antiplatelet nonpersistence, while vitamin K antagonist (VKA) comedication (HR 18.97; 16.91-21.28) increased this risk. Conclusions A large proportion of patients with a first MI still used antiplatelet drugs after 10 years. The frequent discontinuations during this time frame are expected to reduce the effectiveness of antiplatelet drugs as secondary prevention of cardiovascular diseases. Diabetes, hypertension, hypercholesterolaemia, VKA comedication and MI diagnosis period were determinants of antiplatelet nonpersistence. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Perioperative management for patients receiving long-term anticoagulant (AC) and antiplatelet (AP) therapy is a great concern for surgeons. This single-center retrospective study evaluated the risks of hemorrhage and thromboembolism after hepato-biliary-pancreatic (HBP) surgery in such patients. Methods: Between 2009 and 2014, 886 patients underwent HBP surgery. Patients were categorized into the AC (n = 39), AP (n = 77), or control (n = 770) group according to the administration of antithrombotic drugs. Perioperative management of AC and AP therapies followed the guidelines of the Japanese Circulation Society. The incidences of hemorrhage and thromboembolism were compared among groups. We used 1: 1 propensity score matching and compared the incidences between the matched pairs. Results: There were 0, 1 (1.3%), and 26 (3.4%) hemorrhagic complications in the AC, AP, and control groups, respectively (p = 0.16). There were 0, 1 (1.3%), and 6 (0.8%) thromboembolic complications in the AC, AP, and control groups, respectively (p = 0.66). There was no significant difference in hemorrhagic and thromboembolic complications between the propensity-matched pairs. Conclusion: The incidences of hemorrhage and thromboembolism after HBP surgery in patients receiving long-term AC and AP therapies are within acceptable ranges. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Our study aimed to estimate postoperative bleeding risk in older adults taking clopidogrel before gastrointestinal (GI) surgery, to aid surgeons in decisions regarding clopigogrel cessation. Summary Background Data: Balancing risks of postoperative bleeding associated with continued clopidogrel use and those associated with cessation is difficult for GI surgeons. Methods: Using 100% Texas Medicare Claims Data from 2006 to 2011, we identified patients undergoing emergent GI surgery. We propensity score matched patients on clopidogrel before surgery to patients not on clopidogrel. Using conditional logistic regression, we compared risks of bleeding events at 1-month postdischarge between groups, adjusting for bleeding risk factors. Results: In total, 1240 patients undergoing emergent GI surgery while treated with clopidogrel were matched to emergency GI surgery patients not treated with clopidogrel. The only significant preoperative differences between groups were higher percent of clopidogrel-treated patients with congestive heart failure, cholecystectomy, and lower percent of clopidogrel-treated patients with colectomy. Mean age was 76.91 (±7.06) and 76.70 (±7.05) years (P = 0.47), and 63.84% and 59.41% of operations were cholecystectomy, in the clopidogrel and nonclopidogrel groups (P = 0.18). In multi-variable analyses adjusting for Elixhauser index, hyperlipidemia, confounding drugs, and surgery type, odds ratio for bleeding within 30 days of discharge in those exposed to clopidogrel compared with those not exposed was 1.60 (95% confidence interval, 1.08-2.38), with raw rates of bleeding 6.85% and 4.84%. Conclusions: Clopidogrel use in older adults through the preoperative period of GI surgery does not significantly increase bleeding events in the month after surgery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background & Objective: Antiplatelet drugs are frequently used after coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery to prevent venous graft occlusion. The fear of bleeding complications prevents them to be given early post operatively, which is the time when antiplatelets use confers maximum benefit. Our objective was to determine the effect and influence of early aspirin therapy on fatal and nonfatal bleeding complications and blood requirements after coronary bypass surgery (CABG). Methods: The patients who only underwent coronary artery bypass surgery for the first time in the past three years and did not have any bleeding diathesis were retrospectively analyzed from the cardiac surgery database of CPEIC Multan. The patients either received aspirin within six hours of CABG or had it given after 12 hours. The patients were analyzed for mean blood loss and number of blood units transfused. SPSS was used for statistical analysis. P value < 0.05 was considered significant. Results: Total 281 patients received aspirin within six hours while 326 patients did not. Mean blood loss in early aspirin group was 727ml as compared to 767ml in the other group (p value 0.74). The median number of blood units transfused was 2 (p value 0.98). Our results did not show any statistical difference in both the groups. Conclusion: Aspirin can safely be given early after CABG without the fear of bleeding complications thus conferring the advantage of increased graft patency. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

An accurate and comprehensive assessment of platelet function is essential for managing patients who receive antiplatelet therapies or require platelet transfusion either for treating active bleeding or for prophylaxis. Platelets contribute to clotting by undergoing a series of highly regulated functional responses including adhesion, spreading, granular secretion, aggregation, and cytoskeletal contraction. However, current platelet function assays evaluate only partial aspects of this intricate process and often under non-physiological testing conditions. Herein, we describe the development of a new approach to measure multiple key platelet function-related parameters, in a more physiologically relevant ex vivo semi-rigid microenvironment using a membrane capacitance sensor (MCS). MCS response to clotting provided three sensing parameters with sensitivities towards platelet counts, stimulation strengths, and activation pathways. Live confocal fluorescent imaging of stimulated platelets on MCS suggests that the presented system can readily and accurately convert the dynamics of cytoskeletal reorganization into analyzable electrical signals. Together, this new completely electrical sensing platform can be a promising diagnostic venue to recognize the impairment of primary hemostatic functions, evaluate the efficacy of therapeutic interventions, and gain further insights into the mechanisms of platelets in hemostasis and thrombosis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To investigate the incidence and influencing factors affecting the non-adherence behavior of patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) to antiplatelet therapy after discharge and to construct a personalized predictive tool., Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, 289 patients with CHD who were admitted to the Department of Cardiology of The First Affiliated Hospital of the University of Science and Technology of China between June 2021 and September 2021 were enrolled. The clinical data of all patients were retrospectively collected from the hospital information system, and patients were followed up for 1 year after discharge to evaluate their adherence level to antiplatelet therapy, analyze their present situation and influencing factors for post-discharge adherence to antiplatelet therapy, and construct a nomogram model to predict the risk of non-adherence., Results: Based on the adherence level to antiplatelet therapy within 1 year after discharge, the patients were divided into the adherence ( n  = 216) and non-adherence ( n  = 73) groups. Univariate analysis revealed statistically significant differences between the two groups in terms of variable distribution, including age, education level, medical payment method, number of combined risk factors, percutaneous coronary intervention, duration of antiplatelet medication, types of drugs taken at discharge, and CHD type ( P  < 0.05). Furthermore, multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that, except for the medical payment method, all the seven abovementioned variables were independent risk factors for non-adherence to antiplatelet therapy ( P  < 0.05). The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve before and after the internal validation of the predictive tool based on the seven independent risk factors and the nomogram were 0.899 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.858-0.941) and 0.89 (95% CI: 0.847-0.933), respectively; this indicates that the tool has good discrimination ability. The calibration curve and Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness of fit test revealed that the tool exhibited good calibration and prediction consistency ( χ 2  = 5.17, P  = 0.739)., Conclusion: In this retrospective cohort study, we investigated the incidence and influencing factors affecting the non-adherence behavior of patients with CHD after discharge to antiplatelet therapy. For this, we constructed a personalized predictive tool based on seven independent risk factors affecting non-adherence behavior. The predictive tool exhibited good discrimination ability, calibration, and clinical applicability. Overall, our constructed tool is useful for predicting the risk of non-adherence behavior to antiplatelet therapy in discharged patients with CHD and can be used in personalized intervention strategies to improve patient outcomes., Competing Interests: The authors declare there are no competing interests., (©2023 Cao et al.)

Antiplatelet drugs are currently widely used in primary and especially secondary prevention of cardiovascular events. Dental management of patients on antiplatelet therapy is still not clearly defined: the discontinuation of antiplatelet therapy increases the risk of thrombotic complications, whereas uninterrupted antiplatelet therapy is assumed to increase the bleeding complications after dental surgical procedures. The aim of this article is to review the main antiplatelet drugs used for long-term oral antiplatelet therapy, the laboratory methods for evaluating effectiveness of this therapy, to identify the studies and guidelines available for dental management of patients on antiplatelet drugs and to summarize their conclusions and recommendations.The methodology used through the research for the literature review includes the following sources: Medscape, Pubmed - Medline database, Science Direct, and EBSCO host, the data base of Medical University Plovdiv and specialised published books in general medicine and dentistry.

Diffuse alveolar hemorrhage after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is a rare complication. The diagnosis is difficult and can mimic by clinical and radiological features other diagnosis as pneumopathy. We herein report the case of a 63-year-old female admitted to the hospital for ST elevation myocardial infarction. The patient underwent PCI and received dual antiplatelet therapy. Four days later, she developed dyspnea, hemoptysis and fever. Clinical, radiological and biological findings oriented to a pneumopathy and the patient received the treatment for it. Later and because of the non improvement, a thoracic computed tomography was performed and revealed patchy areas of ground-glass opacity consistent with a diffuse pulmonary hemorrhage. The combination therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel was therefore the most likely cause. Although the dual antiplatelet combination reduces systemic ischemic events after PCI, it is associated with increased risk of nonfatal and sometimes fatal bleeding. Hence the necessity of close and careful observation to watch for possible fatal complications.

PurposeVerifyNow antiplatelet assays were performed before and after stenting for various cerebral artery stenoses to determine the effect of the procedure itself to the function of dual antiplatelets given.Materials and MethodsA total of 30 consecutive patients underwent cerebral arterial stenting procedure were enrolled. The antiplatelet pretreatment regimen was aspirin (100 mg daily) and clopidogrel (300 mg of loading dose followed by 75mg daily). VerifyNow antiplatelet assay performed before and right after stenting. The two test results were compared in terms of aspirin-reaction unit (ARU), P2Y12 reaction units (PRU), baseline (BASE), and percentage inhibition. We evaluated occurrence of any intra-procedural in-stent thrombosis or immediate thromboembolic complication, and ischemic events in 1-month follow-up.ResultsThe median Pre-ARU was 418 (range, 350-586). For clopidogrel the medians of the pre-BASE, PRU, and percent inhibition were 338 (279-454), 256 (56-325), and 27% (0-57%). The medians of the post-ARU, BASE, PRU, and percent inhibition after stenting were 469 (range, 389-573), 378 (288-453), 274 (81-370), and 26% (0-79%). There was a significant increase of ARU (p=0.045), BASE (p=0.026), and PRU (p=0.018) before and after stenting. One immediate thromboembolic event was observed in poor-response group after stenting. There was no in-stent thrombosis and ischemic event in 1-month follow-up.ConclusionWe observed a significant increase of platelet reactivity to dual antiplatelet therapy right after stenting procedure for various cerebral arterial stenoses.

Aim. To evaluate platelet activity changes in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) treated with aspirin, clopidogrel and combination of these drugs; to estimate the rate of resistance of CAD patients to antiplatelet treatment. Material and methods. 199 patients with stable CAD were included in the study. Of them, 83 were given aspirin, 46 received clopidogrel, 34 - double antiplatelet therapy (both aspirin and clopidogrel). The trial also studied an additional group of 18 CAD patients on double antiplatelet therapy who had hemorrhages. The control group consisted of 25 healthy volunteers. Platelet aggregation was measured both by a mean size of aggregates (MSA) and light transmission (LTM, Born method) using BIOLA platelet aggregation analyzer. A platelet shape, leukocyte-platelet aggregates (LPA) and erythrocyte-platelet aggregates (EPA) in the whole blood were studied using scanning electron microscopy. The levels of IL-6 and sVCAM were also measured. Results. It was found that 59.8% patients with CAD had high platelet reactivity revealed in 94.9% of cases by measuring spontaneous and induced by 0.1 mcM ADP platelet aggregation. LTM revealed increased platelet reactivity only in 10.7% patients. Resistance to aspirin correlated with the presence of LTA (r = 0.629, p = 0.0001) and the number of large "reticulated" platelets (r = 0.334, p = 0.001). Low platelet reactivity was associated with the presence of circulating EPA (r = -0.362, p = 0.008). Administration of clopidogrel did not decrease platelet reactivity to normal levels in 34.7% patients which correlated with the presence of LPA and EPA. In 83.3% patients with hemorrhages platelet aggregation, induced by 5.0 mcM, ADP was dramatically decreased. Conclusion. Resistance to antiplatelet therapy is related to platelet heterogeneity, the presence of inflammation and state of erythrocytes. LT is capable to reveal only a part of patients resistant to antiplatelet drugs. To fully identify these patients, it is necessary to register spontaneous platelet aggregation and aggregation induced by low doses of ADP. Redundant inhibition of platelet reactivity could be the cause of hemorrhagic events.

Antiplatelet agents like aspirin and clopidogrel are widely used for indications ranging from primary and secondary prevention of myocardial infarction or stroke to prevention of coronary stent thrombosis after percutaneous coronary interventions. When patients receiving antiplatelet drugs are scheduled for surgery, urologists commonly advise routine periprocedural withdrawal of these drugs to decrease the hemorrhagic risks that may be associated if such therapy is continued in the perioperative period. This approach may be inappropriate as stopping antiplatelet drugs often exposes the patient to a more serious risk, i.e. the risk of developing an arterial thrombosis with its potentially fatal consequences. Moreover, it has been seen that the increase in perioperative bleeding if such drugs are continued is usually of a quantitative nature and does not shift the bleeding complication to a higher risk quality. We, in this mini review, look at the physiological role and pathological implications of platelets, commonly used antiplatelet therapy and how continuation or discontinuation of such therapy in the perioperative period affects the hemorrhagic and thrombotic risks, respectively. Literature on the subject between 1985 and 2008 is reviewed. The consensus that seems to have emerged is that the policy of routine discontinuation of antiplatelet drugs in the perioperative period must be discouraged and risk stratification must be employed while making decisions regarding continuation or temporary discontinuation of antiplatelet therapy. Although antiplatelet drugs may be discontinued in patients at a low risk for an arterial thrombotic event, they must be continued in patients where the risks of bleeding and complications related to excessive bleeding are less than the risks of developing arterial thrombosis.