Sevier, Andrew, Smith, Richard, Benfey, Tillmann, Danzmann, Roy, Bernier, Nicholas, and Moccia, Richard
Abstract Biodensity is a major factor affecting the production and welfare of farmed fishes. Arctic charr (Salvelinus alpinus) (average mass 176.9 ± 3.9 g) were held at biodensities of 30, 60, 90, 120, and 150 kg/m3 (4 replicates per treatment) during a 91 day study which examined key growth, stress physiology, and welfare parameters. During experimentation fish were fed to near satiety, and a random subsample of 20 fish (5 per replicate tank) were collected from each treatment every 21 days. Biodensity was found to have no significant effect on mortality rates or physical fin damage. Growth rates were lower in charr reared at the highest biodensities (120, and 150 kg/m3), while feed efficiency was negatively affected at both the highest (120, and 150 kg/m3) and lowest (30 kg/m3) biodensities. Plasma cortisol indicated that Arctic charr are more stressed at lower biodensities, but was not correlated with growth or feed efficiency measures. The results support an optimal biodensity range for charr culture between 60 and 90 kg/m3 to optimize production and welfare. Highlights • The purpose of this study was to provide an estimation of an optimal biodensity for Arctic charr aquaculture, with emphasis on production performance and welfare. High intensity aquaculture operations rely upon high biodensities which may compromise the welfare of the animals being farmed (Browman et al., 2018 ; Moccia, 2013). Thus, there are two drivers at play in determining an optimal biodensity with respect to the economics of fish growth and production performance, and the ethics associated with welfare consideration. Ultimately, the determination of an optimal biodensity for Arctic charr aquaculture must be the result of the careful consideration of these two approaches. • Biodensity had no effect on mortality, plasma glucose or fin damage (caudal and dorsal). However the combination of reduced growth rates (i.e. lower TGC's) observed at the high densities (120, and 150 kg/m3) and reduced feed efficiency (0.56–0.83) at the extremes (30, 120, and 150 kg/m3) suggest a density between 60 and 90 kg/m3 for optimal economic gains. The morphometric data presented here also provide additional considerations for the choice of stocking density in terms of the potential commercial productivity for Arctic charr. • Alternatively, the results of the welfare analyses show evidence of reduced stress (as assessed by circulating levels of plasma cortisol) at higher biodensities, with fish stocked at 150 kg/m3 exhibiting the lowest levels of all treatments. • These two approaches provide slightly different result on which to base a suggestion of an optimal biodensity. The economics approach suggests stocking at densities >30 kg/m3 and <90 kg/m3 for the benefit of producing product of similar quality while improving feed efficiency and growth. However, stocking at higher densities (150 kg/m3) resulted in reduced stress which is associated with the welfare status of farmed animals (Turnbull et al., 2008). Therefore, using a combination of an economics and ethics based approach, the suggested biodensity for Arctic charr aquaculture is somewhere in the range of 60–90 kg/m3 (actuals 65.1–99.0 kg/m3). Within this range, Arctic charr exhibited optimal feed efficiency and growth while maintaining cortisol levels below the 10 ng/mL which is a nominal threshold of cortisol implied for stressed salmonids (Pickering and Pottinger, 1989). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]