Search

Background: Pulmonary sarcomatoid carcinoma (PSC) is a unique subtype of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with a high degree of malignancy and poor therapeutic effects. With the widespread use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in recent years, few studies have reported that immunotherapy is effective against PSC. As a multi-target anti-vascular targeting agent, anlotinib showed a better anti-tumor effect in various cancer species. The paper reported the therapeutic and side effects of pembrolizumab combined with anlotinib in a patient with advanced PSC. Case presentation: This is a 73 year old female patient who underwent thoracoscopy right upper lobectomy and was diagnosed as locally advanced PSC. However, the patient experienced tumor recurrence and metastasis 7 weeks after surgery and was unable to tolerate chemoradiotherapy. Moreover, she detected TP53 mutation and found that tumor mutation burden (TMB) and PD-L1 were high expression. Therefore, the patient received pembrolizumab combined with anlotinib treatment. After 15 cycles of treatment, the tumor significantly shrank with no tumor activity. The evaluation of tumor efficacy is partial response (PR). During the treatment period, she experienced one-degree thyroid-stimulating hormone elevation and two-degree hand-foot syndrome. Pembrolizumab and anlotinib was continued for two years as a maintenance treatment. The patient had a good quality of life and no disease progression was observed. Currently, the patient is still alive without tumor progression and has overall survival exceeding 45 months and toxic side effects were tolerable. Conclusions: Combining ICIs and anti-angiogenic targeted therapy has brought new hope in treating advanced PSC. Additionally, TMB and PD-L1 expression could be potential predictive biomarkers of the efficacy in advanced PSC with immunotherapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Hepatic stellate cell hyperactivation is a central link in liver fibrosis development, transforming growth factor β1 (TGF-β1) is a key activator of HSCs. Aims: This study investigated whether anlotinib attenuates CCl4 induced liver fibrosis in mice and explored its antifibrotic mechanism. Methods: We used the human hepatic stellate cell line LX-2 for in vitro assays and used TGF-β1 to induce hepatic fibrosis in LX-2 cells. We analyzed cytotoxicity using a cell-counting kit-8 and transwell chambers to detect the migratory ability of LX-2 cells. Western blotting was used to detect the protein levels of collagen type I, α-smooth muscle actin, and p-Smad3. In addition, mice with CCl4-induced hepatic fibrosis were used as in vivo models. Histopathological examination was performed using H&E staining, Masson's trichrome staining, and immunohistochemistry. Results: Anlotinib significantly reversed TGF-β1-induced protein levels of Col I, α-SMA and p-Smad3 and inhibits migratory and proliferative abilities in vitro using LX-2 cells. CCl4 cause F4 grade (Ishak) hepatic fibrosis, liver inflammatory scores ranged from 12 to 14 (Ishak), a mean ALT measurement of 130 U/L and a mean measurement AST value of 119 U/L in mice. However, the CCl4-induced changes were markedly attenuated by anlotinib treatment, which returned to F2 grade (Ishak) hepatic fibrosis, liver inflammatory scores ranged from 4 to 6 (Ishak), a mean ALT measurement of 40 U/L and a mean measurement AST value of 56 U/L in mice. Conclusions: Our results suggest that anlotinib-mediated suppression of liver fibrosis is related to the inhibition of TGF-β1 signaling pathway. Hepatic stellate cell hyper activation is a central link in liver fibrosis development, transforming growth factor β1 is a key activator of HSCs. Anlotinib is a multi-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor that has similar targets to nintedanib, a clinically used anti-pulmonary fibrosis drug. Our study demonstrates an FDA-approved drug—anlotinib—that could prevent liver fibrosis and inflammation. Experiments in cell cultures and mice show that anlotinib can inhibit the activation of hepatic stellate cells by down-regulating the TGFβ1/smad3 pathway, thereby reversing liver fibrosis. In animal experiments, anlotinib showed protective effects on the CCl4-induced liver damage, including ameliorating liver inflammation, reversing liver fibrosis and reducing liver enzymes. This is a very good signal, anlotinib may be useful for halting or reversing the progression of liver fibrosis and could be employed in the development of novel therapeutic drugs for the management of chronic liver diseases. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Malignant peritoneal mesothelioma (MPeM) is a rare and highly invasive malignant tumor with a lack of specificity in clinical manifestations, which can easily lead to misdiagnosis and missed diagnosis. Due to the difficulty of early diagnosis, most patients are already in the advanced stage when diagnosed, and the prognosis is poor. At present, there is no standard treatment strategy, and the existing treatment methods are not effective, the duration of remission is short, which cannot meet the clinical needs. Here we describe a patient with advanced MPeM, initially misdiagnosed as ovarian cancer, who responded to treatment with bevacizumab in combination with albumin-bound paclitaxel and cisplatin. In preparation for cytoreductive surgery (CRS), MPeM was confirmed by laparoscopic peritoneal nodule biopsy combined with histological and immunohistochemical results. Subsequently, due to intolerable neurotoxicity after chemotherapy, she received oral anlotinib therapy on April 25, 2022, and remained stable disease (SD) with the medication, having achieved more than 14 months of progression-free survival (PFS) as of the date of our manuscript submission. The patient's total treatment time was over 19 months. These treatments delayed tumor progression, reduced drug side effects, maintained a good quality of life, and further extended overall survival (OS). Our experience is that on the one hand, it is necessary to increase the clinician's understanding of the disease, and make full use of tissue samples and immunohistochemical staining to reduce the occurrence of misdiagnosis. On the other hand, based on preliminary evidence, we found that oral anlotinib offers a viable maintenance treatment strategy for patients with advanced mesothelioma, which needs to be further explored in future studies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Pulmonary sarcomatoid carcinoma (PSC) is an uncommon variant of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), known for its unfavorable prognosis. Previous studies have elucidated that PSC generally exhibits a significant expression of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1), an elevated tumor mutation burden, and marked vascular invasion. These factors imply the possible effectiveness of treatments like immunotherapy and anti-angiogenic therapy. The subject of this case was a 65-year-old male diagnosed with advanced PSC, characterized by high PD-L1 expression and devoid of known driver gene mutations. Owing to the restrictions imposed by the COVID-19 pandemic, the patient initially underwent home-based treatment with anlotinib, which led to symptomatic improvement after a single treatment cycle. Subsequent hospitalization allowed for the administration of anlotinib plus Pembrolizumab, resulting in a partial response. Radiotherapy was necessitated due to local disease progression. But after 15 cycles of treatment with Pembrolizumab, hyperprogression was observed. The patient's overall survival spanned 14 months, with no evident adverse reactions to the medications. Genomic analysis revealed potential associations between treatment efficacy and mutations in the TP53, NF1, and MET genes. This case underscores the effectiveness and safety of a first-line treatment regimen combining pan-target anti-angiogenic therapy (anlotinib) with anti-tumor immunotherapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

ObjectivePatients with advanced sarcomas have a dismal prognosis with few effective therapies. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of anlotinib in the treatment of advanced sarcoma and to explore the relationship between adverse events (AEs) and efficacy. MethodsData from 45 advanced sarcoma patients who received anlotinib monotherapy at Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University between June 2018 and August 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. According to Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1, the objective remission rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were calculated, and the progression free survival (PFS) and treatment-related AEs were recorded and analyzed. Survival analysis was conducted using the Kaplan-Meier survival rates were compared using the Log rank test. ResultsForty patients were treated for more than 1.5 months and received efficacy evaluation. The ORR and DCR after 3 months were 7.5%(3/40) and 80.0%(32/40), respectively. The overall ORR was 2.5%(1/40), the total DCR was 27.5%(11/40), and the median progression-free survival (m-PFS) was 6.70 months; The m-PFS of alveolar soft tissue sarcoma (ASPS) was 10.27 months, which was significantly longer than that of other subtypes of sarcoma (P=0.048). In addition, the DCR of ASPS and synovial sarcoma (SS) was significantly better than that of osteosarcoma (P<0.05). The most common AEs were elevated thyroid stimulating hormone (17.8%, 8/45), anemia (15.6%, 7/45), fatigue (11.1%, 5/45). Five patients developed grade 3 AEs after treatment; The PFS of patients with hand-foot syndrome after treatment was significantly longer than that of patients without hand-foot syndrome (14.10 vs 6.00, P=0.024). ConclusionsThe efficacy of anlotinib in the treatment of ASPS and SS is better than that of other subtypes. The PFS in the group with hand-foot syndrome was significantly longer than that of the group without hand-foot syndrome. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

ObjectiveTo explore whether the survival benefit of the third-line extensive small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) will be obtained by the combination of anlotinib and radiotherapy, and evaluate the safety of this treatment regimen. MethodsTwenty-seven patients with ES-SCLC who received third-line treatment with less than three metastatic organs at the Cancer Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University from November 2018 to July 2021 were collected and treated with radiotherapy based on anlotinib. Kaplan-Meier curve was used to estimate the overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), descriptive statistical analysis was used to evaluate the safety, and European organisation for research and treatment of cancer quality of life questionnaire-core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) was used to evaluate the quality of life. ResultsThe follow-up cut-off date was July 1, 2021, and the follow-up time ranged from 4.8 to 31.0 months, with a median follow-up time of 10.2 months for the entire group. Among the 27 patients, 4 achieved partial remission, 17 had stable disease and 6 had progression of disease. The objective remission rate (ORR) was 14.8%, and the disease control rate (DCR) was 77.8%. Median PFS and the median OS were 5 months and 11 months, respectively. The most common adverse reactions included fatigue (33.3%, 9/27), anorexia (14.8%, 4/27), bleeding (14.8%, 4/27) and hand-foot syndrome (11.1%, 3/27). Most of them were grade 1 to grade 2, 3 cases were more than grade 3, and there was no grade 5 toxicity recorded. After radiotherapy combined with amlotinib treatment, patients showed improvement in general health, somatic functioning, social functioning, and emotional functioning (all P<0.05). ConclusionFor the third-line ES-SCLC patients, radiotherapy based on the anlotinib can significantly prolong their PFS and OS, and the adverse reactions can be tolerated. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Patients with non‐small‐cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and uncommon EGFR alterations typically have worse treatment outcomes than patients with classically EGFR‐mutated NSCLC. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of PD‐1 blockade with sintilimab plus anti‐angiogenic treatment with anlotinib in patients with NSCLC harboring uncommon EGFR mutations. Methods: Patients with metastatic NSCLC harboring uncommon EGFR mutations after two previous treatments, including a platinum‐based chemotherapy regimen and a targeted treatment (or chemotherapy only for patients harboring EGFR ex20ins), received sintilimab combined with anlotinib. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR). Results: At data cutoff (September 27, 2022), median follow‐up was 22.3 months (range, 1.2–37.6). Among 21 enrolled patients, 12 had EGFR ex20ins and nine had other uncommon EGFR mutations such as L861Q, G719A, and G709X. Overall, eight patients (38.1%) achieved an objective response, and 18 (85.7%) achieved disease control. Median (95% CI) progression‐free survival (PFS) was 7.0 (5.4–8.6) months, and median overall survival (OS) was 20.0 (15.6–24.4) months. The 12‐month PFS rate (95% CI) was 22.2% (7.4–42.0), and the 12‐month OS rate was 66.7% (42.5–82.5). Patients harboring EGFR ex20ins had similar ORR and PFS to those with other mutations. Six patients (28.6%) experienced grade 3 treatment‐related adverse events (TRAEs); hand‐foot syndrome was the most common grade 3 TRAE (2 patients; 9.5%). No grade ≥4 TRAEs were observed. Conclusions: The combination of sintilimab and anlotinib demonstrated durable efficacy and was generally well tolerated in patients with NSCLC and uncommon EGFR mutations who had received prior standard‐of‐care treatments. (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04790409). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: To study the safety and efficacy of anlotinib, a multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor, in the treatment of advanced osteosarcoma (OSS) with metastases. Methods: We retrospectively studied patients with advanced OSS and metastases who received anlotinib treatment in our hospital from June 2018 to April 2020. All patients had received standard multimodal therapies, before taking anlotinib. Therapeutic doses of anlotinib were 12 mg for adults and 10 mg for children and adolescents once a day for 2 consecutive weeks, followed by a week of withdrawal. This 3‐week cycle of treatment was continued until the tumor progressed rapidly or the patients failed to tolerate the side effects. Adverse drug reactions were recorded, and therapeutic efficacy was evaluated based on progression‐free survival (PFS), disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), and objective response rate (ORR). Results: The median PFS was 9.8 ±.9 months, and the 6‐ and 10‐month PFS rates were 73% and 33%, respectively. The median OS was 11.4 ±.6 months. No patients achieved complete response. After 6 months of treatment, the DCR and ORR were 80% and 13%, respectively. No drug‐related deaths or Grade 4 adverse events occurred in the patients. Five patients (33%) had Grade 3 adverse events. The most common drug‐related adverse events were hand‐food syndrome, fatigue, high blood pressure, anorexia, and pneumothorax. Conclusions: Anlotinib had a modest therapeutic effect in patients with advanced OSS after the failure of standard treatment. The adverse events were mostly tolerable or relieved after treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective To systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of anlotinib in the treatment of extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) by meta-analysis. Methods PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, CNKI, Wanfang Data, VIP Database, China Biology Medicine disc were searched for the full literature on studies of anlotinib for the treatment of ES-SCLC published from database establishment to November 2022. Other 2 investigators were responsible for screening the literature and extracting data independently according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Revman 5.4 software was used for meta-analysis of the data. Results A total of 6 RCTs were included for analysis studies, with a total of 302 patients. Meta analysis suggested that anlotinib significantly prolonged progression free survival of ES-SCLC (HR=0.12, 95%CI: 0.07 to 0.21, P

Objective To investigate the clinical efficacy and related adverse reactions of the combination of camrelizumab with anlotinib as the third-line therapy on advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Methods We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 84 patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer after second-line treatment. According to different treatment methods, 44 patients who received camrelizumab combined with anlotinib were included in the observation group, and 40 patients who received anlotinib alone were included in the control group. The PFS, ORR, DCR and incidence of adverse reactions were analyzed and compared between the two groups. Results The median PFS of the observation group was longer than that of the control group (7.0 vs. 5.6 months, P=0.001). No statistically significant difference was observed in ORR, DCR, the incidence of adverse reactions or the incidence of adverse reactions above grade 3 between two groups (all P > 0.05). Conclusion The clinical efficacy of camrelizumab combined with anlotinib as third-line therapy on advanced non-small cell lung cancer is better than anlotinib alone, and the safety is good.

Abstract Background The prognosis of patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and brain metastases (BM) was poor. This study aimed to explore the efficacy and safety of anlotinib as third‐line or above treatment in SCLC with BM. Methods This was a subgroup analysis of the ALTER1202 trial, which was a randomized, placebo‐controlled trial aimed to evaluate the role of anlotinib as third‐line treatment or above in patients with SCLC. This study included patients with BM at baseline. The efficacy and safety outcomes included progression‐free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), central nervous system (CNS), objective response rate (ORR), CNS disease control rate (DCR), time to CNS progression, and adverse events (AEs). Results Twenty‐one and nine patients with BM were included in the anlotinib and placebo groups, respectively. The median PFS and OS were 3.8 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.8–6.1) and 6.1 months (95% CI: 4.1–8.0) in the anlotinib group. Anlotinib was associated with a significant improvement in PFS (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.15, 95% CI: 0.04–0.51, p = 0.0005) and OS (HR = 0.26, 95% CI: 0.09–0.73, p = 0.0061) than placebo. Anlotinib significantly prolonged the time to CNS progression (p

Abstract Synovial sarcoma is a highly malignant tumor that accounts for 10% of all soft tissue sarcomas. Primary pulmonary synovial sarcoma (PPSS) is extremely rare, and its prognosis is poor. A diagnosis is usually established after other primary lung malignancies or metastatic extrathoracic sarcomas have been excluded. Therefore, it is often misdiagnosed. In this study, we report the case of a 38‐year‐old woman who was misdiagnosed as having pleural mesothelioma and finally endured surgery to remove the tumor. The tumor showed SYT‐SSX fusion transcripts and was diagnosed as PPSS after combining histopathological and immunohistochemical analyses. Finally, we determined some biomarkers through whole‐exome sequencing (WES) to improve the diagnosis and treatment strategies.

Objective To construct a nomogram prediction model for the treatment effect of anlotinib with the participation of traditional Chinese medicine syndrome elements on the patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) who previously received multiple lines of chemotherapy. Methods The clinical data of 127 patients with ES-SCLC who received at least two cycles of anlotinib treatment were retrospectively studied. Kaplan-Meier method was used to analyze the relationship between each factor and the overall survival time. Cox regression analysis was applied to screen the independent influencing factors of the prognosis of patients with ES-SCLC. R language was employed to build a nomogram prediction model, C-index was used to evaluate the model, and calibration curve was adopted to verify the accuracy of the model. Results Age, PS score, brain metastases, qi deficiency syndrome, yin deficiency syndrome, and blood stasis syndrome were related risk factors for ES-SCLC treated with anlotinib. PS score, brain metastasis, and blood stasis syndrome were independent prognostic factors. On the basis of these three independent influencing factors, a nomogram model was established to predict the prognosis of patients with ES-SCLC treated with anlotinib. The predicted risk was close to the actual risk, showing a high degree of coincidence. Conclusion The nomogram model established with PS score, blood stasis syndrome elements, and brain metastasis as independent factors can predict the prognosis of patients with ES-SCLC receiving second- and third-line treatment of anlotinib.

This study aimed to investigate the effects of combining anlotinib with camrelizumab on clinical efficacy and short-term prognosis in male patients with advanced gastric cancer. A total of 88 male patients admitted to our hospital between May 2019 and March 2022 with advanced gastric cancer were included and randomly assigned to Group A (treated with anlotinib alone) or Group B (treated with anlotinib combined with camrelizumab) using the envelope method, with 44 patients in each group. Their clinical efficacy, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and programmeddeath-1 (PD-1) expression on Cluster of differentiation 4+ (CD4+) and cytotoxic Tlymphocyte (CD8+ T) cells in peripheral blood, immune function parameters, tumor markers, incidence of adverse reactions and survival time were compared. The results showed that the patients in Group B had significantly higher objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR), superior PD-1 in VEGF, CD4+ T cells and CD8+ T cells, significantly improved immune function indicators and tumor markers (Carbohydrate antigen 50 (CA50), carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and cytokeratin 19 fragment (CYFRA21-1)), and significantly longer progression-free survival and overall survival than Group A. In addition, no significant difference in the incidence of adverse reactions between the two groups was observed. Therefore, the combination of anlotinib and camrelizumab could be a clinically beneficial treatment option and recommended for male patients with advanced gastric cancer as it can effectively control tumor progression, improve clinical efficacy and prolong their survival without increasing adverse reactions.

Abstract Objective To retrospectively analyze the efficacy and safety of osimertinib combined with anlotinib in the treatment of advanced non‐small‐cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after drug resistance, and to explore the related factors affecting the efficacy. Methods The clinical data of 34 patients with advanced NSCLC who received osimertinib combined with anlotinib as three or more lines of treatment in the Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College from June 2019 to March 2022 were collected, and the therapeutic efficacy and safety were analyzed. Results A total of 34 advanced NSCLC patients met the inclusion criteria. The objective response rate was 20.6%, the disease response rate was 88.2%, the median overall survival was 19.0 months, and the median progression‐free survival was 6.0 months. The common adverse events were mainly grade 1–2, and only three cases (11.1%) of adverse events were grade 3, including hypertension, proteinuria, and vomiting. No grade 4 or above adverse events were observed. Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status score and bone metastasis were independent prognostic factors for osimertinib combined with anlotinib as three or more lines of treatment in advanced NSCLC. Conclusions Osimertinib combined with anlotinib as three or more lines of treatment in advanced NSCLC was effective and adverse events were tolerable.

Postoperative radiotherapy with concurrent temozolomide (TMZ) followed by up to six cycles of adjuvant TMZ chemotherapy, known as the STUPP regimen, is the established standard treatment for newly diagnosed glioblastoma (GBM). However, its effectiveness is limited. Anlotinib, a multi-kinase inhibitor that targets tumor angiogenesis and cell proliferation, has shown promising results in preclinical GBM models and phase I clinical trials. To assess the efficacy and safety of combining the STUPP regimen with anlotinib, we designed and conducted a phase II trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of combining the STUPP regimen with anlotinib (NCT 04959500). This is a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial with an expected 150 patients randomly assigned 1:1 ratio to receive TMZ-based radiochemotherapy with anlotinib or placebo. Eligibility criteria include histologically confirmed GBM, ECOG performance score ≤2, age ≥18 years, and lack of significant comorbidity. The primary endpoint is median progression-free survival (PFS), while secondary endpoints include 1-year overall survival rate, PFS at 6 months, overall response rate, duration of response, disease control rate, quality of life, and toxicity. From July 2021 to January 25th, 2024, 153 patients were enrolled. The results in this abstract were all obtained without exposing the blind state. The median PFS was 10.05 months (95% CI, 9.43-11.89) in the overall patient population, while the predicted mPFS of placebo group was 7 months according to the results of STUPP and AVAGlio trials. The 1-year overall survival rate is 75.45% (95% CI, 67.06%-81.98%), and the 2-year overall survival rate is 39.41% (95% CI, 26.42%-52.13%). 24.8% of patients experienced at least one grade 3 or higher treatment-related adverse events. 9.8% of patients experienced serious treatment-related adverse events. The most frequent TRAEs were lymphocytopenia, thrombocytopenia, leukopenia, decreased neutrophil count. Under the condition of data blinding, the current research findings suggest that the combination of anlotinib with the STUPP regimen demonstrates encouraging therapeutic efficacy and favorable tolerability, indicating its potential as a viable treatment modality. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

At present, the treatment of recurrent pelvic osteosarcoma is too simple, and most of the patients are treated with chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and/or combined surgery. Here, we report a 29-year-old man diagnosed with local recurrent pelvic osteosarcoma. Imaging showed that the tumor had obvious enhancement and abundant blood vessels. There was no indication of surgery. After the patient’s consent was obtained, we used anlotinib as a sequential treatment to chemotherapy. During the first course of adjuvant chemotherapy, we treated the patient with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) with a total dose of 60 Gy equivalents. No disease recurrence was reported at 25 months after multimodal combination therapy.

Background: Pulmonary sarcomatoid carcinoma (PSC) is a rare pathological type of non-small cell lung cancer, only occurs in 0.1%–0.4 % of lung cancer patients. It has a poor prognosis and shows low response to conventional chemotherapy. Target therapy, immunotherapy, and other new approaches are worth exploring in PSC. Recently, patients with MET ex14 skipping mutation can obtain good therapeutic efficacy through target therapy. But there was no definitive treatment for patients without this special mutation. Case description: Now, we report a female PSC patient without MET ex14 skipping mutation in the cT4N2M1 stage treated with Tislelizumab and Anlotinib obtained remarkable effect for more than 2 years. Significantly, in this case, immunotherapy and antiangiogenic therapy continued to prolong the survival time of more than 10 months for the patient after being treated by local radiotherapy. This is the first case that reported the effectiveness of immunotherapy and antiangiogenic therapy combined with local radiotherapy in treating PSC and achieved more long-term clinical efficacy than other treatments. Conclusions: Thus, immunotherapy and antiangiogenic therapy combined with local radiotherapy may bring new hope to advanced PSC patients and is worth conducting further research. It provided an effective reference for the treatment of advanced PSC patients without METex14 skipping mutation. Moreover, this case also demonstrated the synergistic effect of radiotherapy and immunotherapy.

BackgroundThe efficacy of current adjuvant chemotherapy for gastric adenocarcinoma/gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (GA/GEJA) leaves much to be desired. ctDNA could serve as a potential marker to identify patients who are at higher risk of recurrence. Reinforcing standard adjuvant chemotherapy with immunotherapy has already been indicated to significantly improve clinical outcome, albeit such evidence is rare in GA/GEJA. Here, we intend to explore the clinical benefit of the reinforcement of adjuvant immunotherapy and antiangiogenics alongside with chemotherapy in patients who are deemed in high risk of recurrence by ctDNA analysis, which might shed light on further improvements in adjuvant therapy for GA/GEJA.Methods/DesignThis study is designed as a prospective, multicenter, randomized, controlled phase II study in patients histologically or cytologically diagnosed with GA/GEJA who underwent D2 gastrectomy and achieved R0 or R1 resection. From February 2022, a total of 300 stage III patients will be enrolled and subjected according to ctDNA sequencing results, and those with positive results will subsequently be randomized 1:1 to arm A or B. Patients in arm A will receive anlotinib, penpulimab and XELOX for 6-8 cycles, maintained with anlotinib and penpulimab for up to 1 year, while patients in arm B will receive XELOX alone for 6-8 cycles. ctDNA-negative patients will be assigned to arm C, and patients who are ctDNA positive but failed in randomization will be assigned to arm D. Patients in arms C and D will receive the investigator’s choice of therapy. The primary endpoint is the median disease-free survival (DFS) of arm A versus arm B determined via CT/MRI imaging. Secondary endpoints include the DFS of ctDNA positive patients versus ctDNA negative patients, the 2- and 3-year DFS rates, overall survival (OS), the impact of hallmark molecules on the treatment response, adverse events (AEs), and the impact of nutrition status or exercise on recurrence.DiscussionWe expect that ctDNA would be a strong prognostic factor and ctDNA-positive patients are at higher risk of relapse than ctDNA-negative patients. The addition of anlotinib and penpulimab to XELOX, may contribute to delaying relapse in ctDNA-positive patients.Trial registrationhttps://www.clinicaltrials.gov, identifier NCT05494060.

Summary: Background: No standard maintenance treatment has been obtained to prolong the response duration of soft tissue sarcoma (STS) after first-line chemotherapy. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of anlotinib as a maintenance treatment after chemotherapy in STS. Methods: In this multicentre, open-label, single-arm phase 2 trial, patients with advanced STS who achieved partial response or stable disease after first-line anthracycline-based chemotherapy were enrolled between April 2019 and January 2022. All patients received anlotinib as a maintenance treatment. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) of anlotinib maintenance treatment. Other endpoints included overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR) and safety. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03890068. Findings: At the data cut-off date (August 8, 2022), 49 patients were enrolled, including 17 with liposarcoma (35%) and 15 with leiomyosarcoma (31%). After a median follow-up of 17.1 months (IQR 9.0–27.2), the median PFS from the beginning of maintenance treatment was 9.1 months (95% CI 5.7–12.5), and the median OS was not reached, and the 1-year OS rate for anlotinib maintenance treatment was 98.0%. The best ORR and DCR were 16% (8/49, 95% CI 7–30) and 94% (46/49, 95% CI 83–99), respectively. Most of the treatment-related adverse events were grade 1–2. Of the grade 3–4 adverse events, the most common were hypertension (10%) and hand-foot syndrome reaction (6%). Interpretation: Postchemotherapy maintenance treatment with anlotinib exhibits promising efficacy and tolerable toxicity in patients with advanced STS. Funding: Chia Tai Tianqing Pharmaceutical Group Co., Ltd., the National Key Research and Development Program of China, and the National Natural Science Foundation of China.

Background: Anlotinib showed encouraging anti-tumor activity in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). This study was designed to assess the efficacy and safety of anlotinib plus XELOX as first-line therapy in mCRC patients. Materials and Methods: Eligible patients aged =18 with mCRC were enrolled in this multicenter, single-arm, phase II, exploratory study. Patients received at least 6 cycles of anlotinib, oxaliplatin, and capecitabine as initial therapy. Subsequently, patients received anlotinib monotherapy as maintenance therapy until tumor progression or intolerable toxicity. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Results: Thirty-one patients were included between December 2019 and March 2022. The median follow-up was 17.5 (95% CI, 3.0-17.5) months. The median PFS was 8.3 (95% CI, 6.3-10.0) months, with 6- and 12-month PFS rates of 82.3% (95% CI, 59.2%-93.0%) and 18.9% (95% CI, 4.8%-40.1%), respectively. Fifteen (48.4%) achieved partial response for an ORR of 48.4% (95% CI, 30.2%-66.9%). The disease control rate was 71.0% (95% CI, 52.0%-85.8%) due to 7 (22.6%) stable diseases. The median duration of response was 6.0 (95% CI, 3.6-8.0) months and 1 patient had the longest ongoing response of 17.3 months. Of 24 patients with evaluable imaging, 23 (74.2%) obtained tumor shrinkage. The median PFS (11.0 vs. 6.9 months) and ORR (66.7% vs. 60.0%) for patients with RAS/BRAF wild-type were numerically better than those with mutation. Three patients are still ongoing treatment. The grade 3 or more treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were mainly hypertension (12.9%) and decreased neutrophil count (12.9%). Four (12.9%) had serious TEAEs, primarily including abdominal pain and incomplete intestinal obstruction. Conclusion: Anlotinib plus XELOX as first-line therapy in patients with mCRC showed anti-tumor activity and safety profile, which is worth further investigation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective To investigate the efficacy and safety of Anlotinib combined with PD-1 blockades in patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer （ES-SCLC）. Methods This study retrospectively analyzed the data of 36 patients with ES-SCLC who were treated with at least one previous systematic chemotherapy regimen. All the patients received Anlotinib plus PD-1 blockades therapy. Results Efficacy evaluation and safety analysis were conducted in all the patients. The best efficacy results showed objective response rate was 27.8% （95%CI: 14.2% ~ 45.2%）; disease control rate 80.6% （95%CI: 64.0% ~ 91.8%）. The PFS and OS of the 36 patients were 4.6 months （95%CI: 3.1 ~ 6.1） and 9.3 months （95%CI: 3.3 ~ 15.3）, respectively, indicating that overall adverse reactions were tolerate and controllable. Multivariate cox regression analysis for PFS indicated that ECOG performance status was the independent factor to predict PFS. Conclusion Anlotinib combined with PD-1 blockades regimen preliminarily demonstrates encouraging efficacy and tolerable safety for patients with ES-SCLC in realworld clinical practice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Anlotinib-mediated angiogenic remodeling was delineated in various tumors. Meanwhile, we previously showed that anlotinib inhibited tumor angiogenesis in anaplastic thyroid cancer (ATC). However, the potential role of anlotinib on cell lethality in ATC remains an enigma. Herein, we found that anlotinib inhibited the viability, proliferation, and migration of KHM-5M, C643, and 8505C cells in a dose-dependently manner. Under anlotinib treatment, PANoptosis (pyroptosis, apoptosis, and necroptosis) markers were not changed; however, ferroptosis targets (transferrin, HO-1, FTH1, FTL, and GPX4) were significantly downregulated. ROS levels also increased in a concentration-dependent manner after anlotinib treatment in KHM-5M, C643, and 8505C cells. In addition, protective autophagy was activated in response to anlotinib, and autophagic blockade potentiated anlotinib-mediated ferroptosis and antitumor effects in vitro and in vivo. Our new discovery identified autophagy-ferroptosis signaling pathway which provides mechanistic insight into anlotinib-mediated cell death, and synergistic combination therapy may help develop new ATC treatment strategies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Anaplastic thyroid carcinoma (ATC) is one of the most lethal malignancies with no effective treatment. In this study, we investigated the efficacy and safety of anlotinib-based chemotherapy as first-line therapy for ATC. Methods: Locally advanced or metastatic (LA/M) ATC patients who never received antitumor treatment of any sort were eligible for this study. The patients received 2–6 cycles anlotinib12mg on days 1–14 per 21 days. Chemotherapy regimens consisted of paclitaxel, capecitabine, or paclitaxel plus carboplatin/capecitabine. The end points including Objective Response Rate (ORR), Disease Control Rate (DCR), Progression-Free Survival (PFS), and Disease Specification Survival (DCS) were analyzed. Results: A total of 25 patients were enrolled. 1 patient achieved a Complete Response (CR) and 14 patients achieved Partial Response (PR). The best ORR was 60.0%, and the DCR was 88.0%. The median PFS was 25.1 weeks, and the median DCS was 96.0 weeks. Approximately 56% (14 patients) had at least one Adverse Event (AE) of any grade. Most AEs were well tolerated. The most common AEs was palmar–plantar erythrodysesthesia syndrome (28.0%). Conclusions: Anlotinib-based chemotherapy as first-line therapy is a safe and effective intervention for the treatment of LA/M ATC patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Anlotinib has demonstrated encouraging clinical outcomes in the treatment of lung cancer, soft tissue sarcoma and thyroid carcinoma. Several clinical studies have shown a relationship between anlotinib treatment and the occurrence of hyperlipidemia. The fundamental mechanisms, however, are still largely unclear. Here, the effect of anlotinib on lipid metabolism in an animal model and human cancer cells was evaluated and the role of lipid metabolism in the antitumor efficacy of anlotinib was investigated. Methods: The C57BL/6 J mouse model as well as A549 and H460 human lung cancer cell lines were used to examine the impact of anlotinib on lipid metabolism both in vivo and in vitro. Levels of triglycerides, high-density lipoprotein, low-density lipoprotein (LDL), and total cholesterol in serum or cell samples were determined using assay kits. The expression levels of crucial genes and proteins involved in lipid metabolism were measured by quantitative RT-PCR and Western blotting. Furthermore, exogenous LDL and knockdown of low-density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR) were used in H460 cells to investigate the relevance of lipid metabolism in the anticancer efficacy of anlotinib. Results: Anlotinib caused hyperlipidemia in C57BL/6 J mice, possibly by downregulating hepatic LDLR-mediated uptake of LDL cholesterol. AMP-activated protein kinase and mammalian target of rapamycin inhibition may also be involved. Additionally, anlotinib enhanced sterol response element binding protein 1/2 nuclear accumulation as well as upregulated LDLR expression in A549 and H460 cells, which may be attributable to intracellular lipid accumulation. Knockdown of LDLR reduced intracellular cholesterol content, but interestingly, anlotinib significantly improved intracellular cholesterol accumulation in LDLR-knockdown cells. Both exogenous LDL and LDLR knockdown decreased the sensitivity of cells to anlotinib. Conclusions: Anlotinib modulates host lipid metabolism through multiple pathways. Anlotinib also exerts a significant impact on lipid metabolism in cancer cells by regulating key transcription factors and metabolic enzymes. In addition, these findings suggest lipid metabolism is implicated in anlotinib sensitivity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Malignant pleural and peritoneal effusion are common clinical manifestations in advanced malignant tumors, associated with a poor prognosis. This article presents a case of advanced lung adenocarcinoma with ROS1 rearrangement, characterized by persistent malignant pleural and peritoneal effusion. The patient received combined therapy of Crizotinib and Anlotinib, resulting in a significant reduction and even disappearance of the malignant effusion. Exploratory use of this treatment approach improved the patient's quality of life and holds potential for extending overall survival. However, given the single case report nature, the efficacy of this regimen in treating advanced ROS1-rearranged lung adenocarcinoma should be considered as a supplementary strategy, warranting further validation through multicenter clinical data. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) is a highly aggressive and lethal malignancy that accounts for 10–15% of lung cancers, and it is generally divided into limited and extensive stage. The standard of care for patients with newly diagnosed extensive-stage SCLC (ES-SCLC) is still platinum-based chemotherapy and as maintenance therapy scheme. Although most parts of patients experience a significant tumor response to first-line therapy, the disease recurs invariably. Anlotinib hydrochloride, a novel oral multitarget tyrosine kinase inhibitor, has significant inhibitory activity against angiogenesis-related kinases, such as VEGFR, FGFR, PDGFR, and c-Kit kinase associated with tumor cell proliferation. Fluzoparib is a type of inhibitor of poly ADP ribose polymerase (PARP, including PARPl, PARP2 and PARP3). Previous studies have shown that Fluzoparib has a strong inhibitory effect on PARP1 activity at the molecular and cellular levels. Methods: This is a multi-center, prospective, single-arm phase II clinical study. A total of 50 ES-SCLC patients who experienced disease progression after first-line standard platinum-based chemotherapy with/without immune checkpoint inhibitors scheme, or within 6 months after the completion of treatment will be recruited. Those who had prior treatment with any PARP inhibitor or antiangiogenic agent includes anlotinib, bevacizumab, sorafenib, and thalidomide are excluded. Eligible patients will receive oral anlotinib 8 mg once daily and oral fluzoparib 150 mg twice daily until disease progression or intolerable toxicity. The primary endpoint is objective response rate (ORR). Discussion: The addition of fluzoparib to anlotinib is expected to increase the clinical benefit in ES-SCLC patients after platinum-based chemotherapy. Trial registration: This study protocol was prospectively registered on June 17, 2021. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04933175. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The combination of immunotherapy and antiangiogenic agents for the treatment of refractory solid tumor has not been well investigated. Thus, our study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a new regimen of anlotinib plus PD‐1 inhibitor to treat refractory solid tumor. APICAL‐RST is an investigator‐initiated, open‐label, single‐arm, phase II trial in patients with heavily treated, refractory, metastatic solid tumor. Eligible patients experienced disease progression during prior therapy without further effective regimen. All patients received anlotinib and PD‐1 inhibitor. The primary endpoints were objective response and disease control rates. The secondary endpoints included the ratio of progression‐free survival 2 (PFS2)/PFS1, overall survival (OS) and safety. Forty‐one patients were recruited in our study; 9 patients achieved a confirmed partial response and 21 patients had stable disease. Objective response rate and disease control rate were 22.0% and 73.2% in the intention‐to‐treat cohort, and 24.3% and 81.1% in the efficacy‐evaluable cohort, respectively. A total of 63.4% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 46.9%‐77.4%) of the patients (26/41) presented PFS2/PFS1 >1.3. The median OS was 16.8 months (range: 8.23‐24.4), and the 12‐ and 36‐month OS rates were 62.8% and 28.9%, respectively. No significant association was observed between concomitant mutation and efficacy. Thirty‐one (75.6%) patients experienced at least one treatment‐related adverse event. The most common adverse events were hypothyroidism, hand‐foot syndrome and malaise. This phase II trial showed that anlotinib plus PD‐1 inhibitor exhibits favorable efficacy and tolerability in patients with refractory solid tumor. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To investigate the safety and efficacy of anlotinib hydrochloride capsules in stage III–IV non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods: NSCLC patients received anlotinib monotherapy or combination therapy. The primary end point was adverse reactions during anlotinib treatment and the secondary end point was progression-free survival. Results: During anlotinib treatement, 41.85% (167/399) of patients experienced adverse reactions, and the monotherapy group had a lower incidence than the combination group (36.89 vs 49.68%; p = 0.012). The median progression-free survival of patients in the monotherapy group was significantly lower than that in the combination group (5 vs 6 months; p = 0.0119). Conclusion: Compared with anlotinib monotherapy, combination therapy resulted in longer PFS and a higher incidence of adverse reactions in patients with NSCLC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation and concurrent mutations have a poor prognosis. This study aimed to examine anlotinib plus icotinib as a first-line treatment option for advanced NSCLC carrying EGFR mutation with or without concurrent mutations. Methods: This phase 2, single-arm, multicenter trial (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03736837) was performed at five hospitals in China from December 2018 to November 2020. Non-squamous NSCLC cases with EGFR-sensitizing mutations were treated with anlotinib and icotinib. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included the objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), and toxicity. Results: Sixty participants were enrolled, including 31 (52%) and 29 (48%) with concurrent mutations and pathogenic concurrent mutations, respectively. The median follow-up was 26.9 (range, 15.0-38.9) months. ORR and DCR were 68.5% and 98.2%, respectively. Median PFS was 15.1 (95%CI: 12.6–17.6) months which met the primary endpoint, median DoR was 13.5 (95%CI: 10.0-17.1) months, and median OS was 30.0 (95%CI: 25.5–34.5) months. Median PFS and OS in patients with pathogenic concurrent mutations were 15.6 (95%CI: 12.5–18.7) months and not reached (95%CI: 17.46 months to not reached), respectively. All patients experienced TRAEs, including 26 (43%) and 1 (1.7%) who had grade ≥ 3 and serious treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs). Conclusions: Anlotinib combined with icotinib was effective and well-tolerated as a first-line treatment option for EGFR mutation-positive advanced NSCLC with or without concurrent mutations. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03736837. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To investigate the effects of anlotinib on proliferation and apoptosis of A549 cells based on phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)/serine-threonine protein kinase (AKT) signaling pathway. A549 cells were divided into the control group, the experimental groups with different doses, the anlotinib group, the positive drug group, the inhibitor group and the activator group. The intervention time was 24 hours. The cell viability, cell morphology, the rate of proliferation, apoptosis and related protein expression levels were detected. The results showed that cell viability decreased after treatment with 20 μmol/L anlotinib. Compared with the control group, the cell growth of anlotinib group and positive drug group was inhibited, the cell proliferation rate, cysteinyl aspartate specific proteinase D1 (Cyclin D1) and the expression levels of p-PI3K and p-AKT decreased, and the number of apoptosis cells and the expression of cysteine aspartic protease-3 (Caspase-3) increased. The inhibitor enhanced these changes, while the activator had the opposite trend to the inhibitor. These results of this study indicate that anlotinib can significantly inhibit the proliferation and promote apoptosis of A549 cells, and its mechanism might be related to the inhibition of PI3K/AKT pathway signal transduction. The results of this study further illustrate the potential value of antilung cancer drugs and provide a new theoretical basis for the research and development of anti-lung cancer drugs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The current treatment options for epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation-positive lung cancer in the elderly with tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) resistance are limited. Although chemotherapy combined with vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors significantly improves progression-free survival (PFS) in TKI-resistant patients, it often cannot be tolerated in elderly patients, leading to treatment failure. Anlotinib is a small molecule inhibitor made in China. The application of low-dose anlotinib in elderly patients with TKI-resistant lung cancer deserves further investigation. A total of 48 elderly patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were enrolled to evaluate the efficacy of anlotinib combined with continuous EGFR-TKI vs. anlotinib monotherapy in patients with acquired EGFR-TKI resistance. Anlotinib was administered at a dose of 6-8 mg per day, lower than the normal dose and known as a low dose, which is well tolerated in elderly patients. There were 25 cases in the combination group and 23 cases in the anlotinib monotherapy group. The primary endpoint of the present study was PFS, and the secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), response rate and toxicity. The median PFS (mPFS) was significantly longer in the combination group than that in the anlotinib monotherapy group: 6.0 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 4.35-7.65] compared with 4.0 months (95% CI, 3.38-4.62) (P=0.002). Analysis of the subgroups showed similar trends in results. The median OS was 32 months (95% CI, 22.04-41.96) in the combination group and 28 months (95% CI, 27.13-28.87) in the anlotinib monotherapy group (P=0.217). According to stratification analysis, second-line treatment with anlotinib combined with EGFR-TKI resulted in a better mPFS than third-line treatment (7.5 vs. 3.7 months, HR=3.477; 95% CI, 1.117-10.820; P=0.031). In the combination group, patients with gradual/local progression after EGFR-TKI failure had a longer mPFS than those with dramatic progression (7.5 vs. 6.0 months, HR=5.875; 95% CI, 1.414-10.460; P=0.015). Multivariate analyses showed that continuous EGFR-TKI combined with anlotinib after EGFR-TKI resistance was associated with longer PFS (P=0.019), whereas dramatic progression (P=0.014) had a detrimental effect on follow-up treatment. Grade 2 adverse events (AEs) were reported in four patients (17.39%) in the anlotinib monotherapy group and eight patients (32.00%) in the combination group. Of these, the most common grade 2 AEs were hypertension, fatigue, diarrhea, paronychia, mucositis and transaminase elevation. There were no grade 3/4/5 AEs. In conclusion, the present study demonstrated that low-dose anlotinib combined with EGFR-TKI is superior to anlotinib alone following EGFR-TKI failure, making it the preferred regimen for elderly patients with acquired EGFR-TKI resistance. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: Acquired resistance represents a bottleneck to epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) treatment in lung cancer. Our study aimed to explore the efficacy of antiangiogenic‐based therapy in osimertinib‐resistant NSCLC patients and assess the efficacy of anlotinib in vitro study. Methods: Our multicenter study retrospectively collected 268 osimertinib‐resistant NSCLC patients with EGFR T790M mutation and explored the efficacy of anlotinib in patients and in vitro. Results: PFS was significantly longer in the antiangiogenic‐based therapy group than in the immunotherapy group (HR: 0.71, p = 0.050) and the chemotherapy group (HR: 0.28, p = 0.001). Both the ORR and DCR of the antiangiogenic‐based group were higher than the immunotherapy group and the chemotherapy group. Subgroup analysis showed a trend of more benefits from the anlotinib‐based therapy than the bevacizumab‐based therapy in terms of PFS (HR: 0.63, p = 0.087) and OS (HR: 0.52, p = 0.063). In vitro assays verified that anlotinib alone or combined with osimertinib exerted potent cytotoxicity to T790M‐mutant H1975 cell line with acquired osimertinib resistance. Conclusions: Our study suggested that antiangiogenic‐based therapy might improve PFS and OS in EGFR‐mutant NSCLC patients with acquired resistance to osimertinib. Moreover, anlotinib‐based therapy could be a promising effective treatment for this group of patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

For patients with locally unresectable recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma who relapsed after 2 years of radiotherapy, re-radiotherapy is also the preferred treatment. However, for patients relapsed within 2 years, the use of reradiotherapy would be greatly limited by its adverse effects. Consequently, finding a new strategy to prolong the time of re-radiotherapy for locally recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma is very necessary to reduce the related side effects and improve the curative effect. Anlotinib is an orally available small molecule multi-target tyrosine kinase inhibitor that primarily inhibits VEGFR2/3, FGFR1-4, PDGFR α/β, c-Kit, and Ret. However, whether recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients can be treated with anlotinib combined with ticeorgio (also called S-1) remains unknown. Herein, we report a nasopharyngeal carcinoma patient with local recurrence after radical radiotherapy who benefited from combination treatment of anlotinib with ticeorgio. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Researches about the association between serum albumin-to-globulin ratio (AGR) and the prognosis of lung cancer are limited. We aimed to investigate the relationship between AGR and overall survival (OS) in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with anlotinib. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted on 196 advanced NSCLC patients with anlotinib treatment between June 1, 2018 and June 1, 2021. The exposure was AGR, calculated by baseline serum albumin / (serum total protein - serum albumin). The outcome was OS, defined as the period from the date of initial treatment with anlotinib to death or the last follow-up. The univariate and multivariate linear regression models and generalized additive models (GAM) were used to analyze the relationship between AGR and OS. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to analyze the OS. Results: After adjusting for potential confounders, a non-linear relationship was observed between AGR and OS, which had an inflection point of 1.24. The hazard ratio and the confidence intervals on the left and the right sides of the inflection point were 13.05 (0.52 to 327.64) and 0.20 (0.07 to 0.57), respectively. It suggested that AGR was positively associated with OS when AGR was larger than 1.24, for every 1 unit increase in AGR, the risk of death lowered approximately by 80%. Conclusions: The relationship between AGR and the OS for advanced NSCLC patients with anlotinib is non-linear. AGR level is an independent protective factor for OS in advanced NSCLC patients who received anlotinib therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Despite the benefit with cancer immunotherapies in clinical implication, immunotherapeutic resistance occurred in many patients and the mechanism remains unknown. Increasing evidence has revealed that cell‐intrinsic programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD‐L1) may play a non‐negotiable part in immunotherapeutic resistance. Our present study aimed to elucidate the immune‐independent acquired resistance mechanism to PD‐L1 antibody. We found elevated PD‐L1 expression induced by PD‐L1 antibodies in cancer cell and vascular endothelial cells (VECs) with substantially acquired resistance to PD‐L1 antibodies. Moreover, proliferation of resistant cells was accelerated and the apoptosis was reduced in the absence of immune compared with parental cells. Subsequently, we confirmed that the activation of the PI3K/AKT pathway is involved in the upregulation of PD‐L1 expression. Finally, we found that low dose of anlotinib downregulated PD‐L1 expression only in VECs via inhibiting the PI3K/AKT pathway; however, the same effect was not observed in cancer cells. To sum up, our findings revealed that upregulation of PD‐L1 via activation of the PI3K/AKT signal pathway may promote acquired resistance to PD‐L1 antibodies in an immune‐independent manner. Significance: These findings provide new mechanisms of immunotherapeutic resistance and effective evidence of anlotinib combined with immunotherapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Anlotinib is a multi-target anti-angiogenic agent. The retrospective study was conducted to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of anlotinib as monotherapy or combination therapy for the treatment of recurrent high-grade gliomas. Methods: In this retrospective study, patients with recurrent high-grade glioma (according to the 2021 World Health Organization classification as levels III-IV) at Sichuan Cancer Hospital from June 2019 to June 2022 were included. The patients were divided into an anlotinib-monotherapy group and an anlotinib-combination group, and received oral anlotinib 8 to 12 mg once a day, with 2 weeks on/1 week off. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). The Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), 6-month PFS rate, objective response rate (ORR), and disease control rate (DCR). Also, adverse events were evaluated using the National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE version 5.0). Results: A total of 29 patients (including 20 glioblastomas, 1 diffuse midline glioma, 5 anaplastic astrocytoma, and 3 anaplastic oligodendroglioma) were included in this study. Of these, 34.48% of the patients were treated with anlotinib alone and 65.52% with anlotinib combination therapy. The median follow-up time was 11.6 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 9.4-15.7). The median PFS was 9.4 months (95% CI: 6.5-12.3), and the 6-month PFS rate was 62.1%. The median OS was 12.7 months (95% CI: 9.7-15.7), and the 12-month OS rate was 48.3%. Evaluation of treatment response was performed according to RANO (response assessment in neuro-oncology, RANO) criteria, including 21 partial response, 6 stable disease, and 2 PFS events. The ORR and DCR were 72.4%, and 93.1%, respectively. Grade III AEs occurred in 2 patients, and the others were less than grade III. The most common AE was thrombocytopenia, with an incidence rate of 31.0%. All AEs were alleviated and controlled by symptomatic treatment. No treatment-related deaths occurred. Conclusion: Anlotinib had a low incidence of AEs and good safety in the treatment of recurrent high-grade glioma. Moreover, it showed good short-term effectiveness and significantly prolonged the PFS of patients, which may become a promising therapeutic option for recurrent high-grade glioma and lay a foundation for further clinical studies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Anlotinib, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) has been in clinical application to inhibit malignant cell growth and lung metastasis in osteosarcoma (OS). However, a variety of drug resistance phenomena have been observed in the treatment. We aim to explore the new target to reverse anlotinib resistance in OS. Materials and Methods: In this study, we established four OS anlotinib-resistant cell lines, and RNA-sequence was performed to evaluate differentially expressed genes. We verified the results of RNA-sequence by PCR, western blot and ELISA assay. We further explored the effects of tocilizumab (anti-IL-6 receptor), either alone or in combined with anlotinib, on the inhibition of anlotinib-resistant OS cells malignant viability by CCK8, EDU, colony formation, apoptosis, transwell, wound healing, Cytoskeletal stain assays, and xenograft nude mouse model. The expression of IL-6 in 104 osteosarcoma samples was tested by IHC. Results: We found IL-6 and its downstream pathway STAT3 were activated in anlotinib-resistant osteosarcoma. Tocilizumab impaired the tumor progression of anlotinib-resistant OS cells, and combined treatment with anlotinib augmented these effects by inhibiting STAT3 expressions. IL-6 was highly expressed in patients with OS and correlated with poor prognosis. Conclusion: Tocilizumab could reverse anlotinib resistance in OS by IL-6/STAT3 pathway and the combination treatment with anlotinib rationalized further studies and clinical treatment of OS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The objective of this study was to investigate the pharmacokinetic behavior of anlotinib in Chinese patients with malignant tumors using the population approach. A total of 407 anlotinib plasma concentrations from 16 patients were analyzed in this study. Anlotinib was administered orally 12 or 16 mg in the single‐dose phase and 12 mg once daily in the multiple‐dose phase. A population pharmacokinetic model was established using nonlinear mixed‐effects model method. The potential influence of demographic and pathophysiological factors on oral anlotinib pharmacokinetics was investigated in a covariate analysis. The final model was evaluated using goodness‐of‐fit plots, visual predictive check, and bootstrap methods. The pharmacokinetic profile of anlotinib was best described by a 1‐compartment model with first‐order absorption and first‐order elimination. The population estimates of the apparent total clearance, apparent volume of distribution, and absorption rate constant were 8.91 L/h, 1950 L, and 0.745/h, respectively. Body weight was identified as a significant covariate on apparent volume of distribution. Patients with low body weight tended to show higher exposure to anlotinib than those with high body weight. However, these differences were not clinically significant based on the simulations of the individual body weight effects. Taken together, this population pharmacokinetic model adequately described the pharmacokinetics of anlotinib in patients with malignant tumors and supports the same starting dose among them. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Few cases of patients with Cheng's type III portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT) have been reported to achieve radical cure without recurrence over time. In this study, we reported on a 55-year-old male patient with a diagnosis of stage IIIa China liver cancer staging (CNLC), PVTT Cheng's type III, mild cirrhosis, and chronic viral hepatitis B. TACE combined with radioactive iodine-125 (125I) particle implantation was applied to achieve radical treatment with sequential oral anlotinib hydrochloride capsules. This case might serve as a reference for the treatment of this disease. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background Pulmonary tumor thrombotic microangiopathy (PTTM) is a rare malignancy-related respiratory complication, demonstrating rapid progression of pulmonary hypertension (PH) and respiratory failure. Although a number of treatments have been attempted for patients diagnosed with or suspected of having PTTM, successful-treated cases of PTTM were mainly from imatinib therapy, which was a PDGF receptor inhibitor. Anlotinib was a novel tyrosine kinase inhibitor that targets VEGFR, FGFR, PDGFR, and c-kit. Case presentation We reported a patient of PTTM associated with gastric carcinoma, whom were treated with anlotinib, thereby exhibiting significant improvement of PH and respiratory dysfunction. Conclusion Our case provides a new understanding of therapy to PTTM, with implications for defining anlotinib as candidate drug for PTTM. Clinical diagnosis and prompt initiation of anlotinib might be one of the strategies in patients with unstable PTTM.

Abstract Background Anlotinib is a multi-targeted receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) which has exhibited encouraging clinical activity in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and soft tissue sarcoma. Raltitrexed is well known to be effective in the treatment of colorectal cancer in China. The present study aims to investigate the combinatory antitumor effect of anlotinib and raltitrexed on human esophageal squamous carcinoma cells and further explore the molecular mechanisms in vitro. Methods Human esophageal squamous cell lines KYSE-30 and TE-1 were treated with anlotinib or raltitrexed, or both, then cell proliferation was measured by MTS and colony formation assay; cell migration and invasion were detected by wound-healing and transwell assays; cell apoptosis rate was studied by flow cytometry and the transcription of apoptosis-associated proteins were monitored by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) analysis. Finally, western blot was performed to check phosphorylation of apoptotic proteins after treatment. Results Treatment with raltitrexed and anlotinib showed enhanced inhibitory effects on cell proliferation, migration and invasiveness compared with raltitrexed or anlotinib monotherapy. Meanwhile, raltitrexed combined with anlotinib strongly increased cell apoptosis percentage. Moreover, the combined treatment down-regulated mRNA level of the anti-apoptotic protein Bcl-2 and invasiveness-associated protein matrix metalloproteinases-9 (MMP-9), while up-regulated pro-apoptotic Bax and caspase-3 transcription. Western blotting showed that the combination of raltitrexed and anlotinib could inhibit the expression of phosphorylated Akt (p-Akt), Erk (p-Erk) and MMP-9. Conclusions This study indicated that raltitrexed enhanced the antitumor effects of anlotinib on human ESCC cells by down-regulating phosphorylation of Akt and Erk, providing a novel treatment option for patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC).

Abstract Objectives Treatments for advanced small‐cell lung cancer (SCLC) patients who are resistant to first‐line chemotherapy are limited. Given that antiangiogenic agents and immune‐checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) can confer synergistic therapeutic benefits, combination therapy should be considered. We explored the efficacy and safety of combination therapy with anlotinib and programmed cell death protein 1 (PD‐1)/programmed cell death‐ligand 1 (PD‐L1) inhibitors as second‐line and subsequent therapy for advanced SCLC. Materials and Methods We reviewed advanced SCLC patients at Shanghai Chest Hospital who had received anlotinib in combination with ICIs from November 2016 to November 2020 as second‐ and subsequent‐line treatment. Patients with advanced SCLC who had received paclitaxel monotherapy as second‐line treatment were included as the control group. Results A total of 141 patients were included in the final analysis (40 in the combination therapy group and 101 in the paclitaxel monotherapy group). The median progression‐free survival (PFS) times for the combination therapy and paclitaxel monotherapy groups were 3.40 and 2.83 months (p = 0.022), respectively, while the median overall survival (OS) times for the combination therapy and paclitaxel monotherapy groups were 8.20 and 5.87 months (p = 0.048), respectively. Hypertension and hepatic dysfunction were the most pronounced adverse events of combination therapy and two patients changed regimens due to severe fatigue and anorexia. Conclusion The combination of anlotinib and PD‐1/PD‐L1 blockade has promising efficacy and safety as a second‐line or subsequent therapy for SCLC.

Chen Wang,1,2 Qifeng Cao,2,&ast; Shun Zhang,2,&ast; Hailong Liu,2 Huangqi Duan,2 Weimin Xia,2 Haibo Shen,2 Cheng Wang1 1Department of Urology, The People’s Hospital of SND, Suzhou, People’s Republic of China; 2Department of Urology, Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China&ast;These authors contributed equally to this workCorrespondence: Cheng Wang, Department of Urology, The People’s Hospital of SND, Suzhou, People’s Republic of China, Tel +86-15050163288, Email 15050163288@163.com Haibo Shen, Department of Urology, Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China, Tel +86-18601712802, Email shenhaibo@xinhuamed.com.cnIntroduction and Objective: The mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway is inhibited by the pan-target inhibitor Anlotinib, which induces tumor cell death. In addition to the common apoptosis and necrosis, there is also a pyroptosis mode of cancer cell death in recent years, which is mainly manifested by the cleavage of gasdermin proteins (GSDMs). Gasdermin B (GSDMB) participates in the progression and outcome of bladder cancer. The efficacy and mechanism of Anlotinib in the treatment of GSDMB-positive bladder tumors have not been studied to date.Methods: The relationship between GSDMB expression and tumor stage, overall survival rate, immunotherapy response, tumor recurrence and progression rate was analyzed from the TCGA bladder cancer database. Anlotinib was used to treat GSDMB-positive bladder cancer in mice followed by flow analysis of the secretion of inflammatory factors related to pyroptosis and the level of anti-tumor factors. Western blot analysis detected which MAPK and MEK signal transduction pathways.Results: TCGA data analysis showed that the overall survival rate of bladder cancer patients with high GSDMB expression was better than that of patients with low GSDMB expression. In vivo experiments showed that Anlotinib was more effective in the treatment of GSDMB-positive bladder cancer than GSDMB-negative bladder cancer. Anlotinib can increase the secretion of antitumor-related factors in GSDMB-positive bladder cancer such as TNF-a and CD107a. In addition, Anlotinib also induced an increase in GSDMB protein expression. Anlotinib treatment of GSDMB-positive bladder cancer decreased AKT and MEK protein expression, which were involved in Anlotinib signal transduction pathway.Conclusion: Anlotinib has a strong antitumor effect on GSDMB-positive bladder tumors. This effect is mainly achieved by anlotinib stimulating the secretion of relevant antitumor factors by lymphocytes. The PI3K/AKT and MEK signal transduction pathways were inhibited by Anlotinib in bladder cancer expressing GSDMB protein.Keywords: bladder cancer, Anlotinib, GSDMB, targeted therapy, pyroptosis

Management and treatment of terminal metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) remains heavily debated. We sought to investigate the efficacy of programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) inhibitor plus anlotinib as a potential solution for terminal mCRPC and further evaluate the association of genomic characteristics with efficacy outcomes. We conducted a retrospective real-world study of 25 mCRPC patients who received PD-1 inhibitor plus anlotinib after the progression to standard treatments. The clinical information was extracted from the electronic medical records and 22 patients had targeted circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) next-generation sequencing. Statistical analysis showed that 6 (24.0%) patients experienced prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response and 11 (44.0%) patients experienced PSA reduction. The relationship between ctDNA findings and outcomes was also analyzed. DNA-damage repair (DDR) pathways and homologous recombination repair (HRR) pathway defects indicated a comparatively longer PSA-progression-free survival (PSA-PFS; 2.5 months vs 1.2 months, P = 0.027; 3.3 months vs 1.2 months, P = 0.017; respectively). This study introduces the PD-1 inhibitor plus anlotinib as a late-line therapeutic strategy for terminal mCRPC. PD-1 inhibitor plus anlotinib may be a new treatment choice for terminal mCRPC patients with DDR or HRR pathway defects and requires further investigation.

Abstract Background Antiangiogenic drugs have shown initial efficacy in the treatment of advanced thymic carcinomas (TCs); however, data are limited. In this study, we provide real-world data relating to the efficacy of antiangiogenic drugs for the treatment of patients with TCs. Methods We retrospectively collected data on clinical progress after first-line chemotherapy in TCs patients who were treated with small molecule antiangiogenic drugs at our institution between January 2010 and December 2021. Tumor response was evaluated according to version 1.1 of the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors. Progression free survival and overall survival were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results Of the 17 patients enrolled, 13 (76.5%) received apatinib and four (23.5%) anlotinib monotherapy with an objective response rate of 23.5%. Eleven (64.7%) patients had stable disease. The median follow-up period was 46.0 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 33.0–59.0 months). The median progression survival and overall survival were 7.9 months (95% CI, 6.5–9.3) and 47.0 months (95% CI, 35.4–58.6), respectively. In the 13 patients receiving apatinib, the median PFS was 7.0 months (95% CI, 5.0–9.0), compared with 8.0 months (95% CI, 2.7–13.3 months) for patients in the anlotinib group (P = 0.945). The most common grade 3 adverse events (AEs) were hypertension (n = 3, 23.1%), followed by proteinuria and hand-foot syndrome (HFS, n = 2, 15.4%). There were no grade 4 AEs although eight patients (47.1%) required mid-course discontinuation. Conclusion For refractory TCs, small molecule antiangiogenic drugs are efficacious as second- or post-line treatments. The toxicity of antiangiogenic therapy is manageable.

Objective: To investigate the clinicopathological characteristics, diagnosis, differential diagnosis, biological behavior, prognosis, and treatment options of patients with primary epithelioid angiosarcoma(EA) of the bladder. Methods: The clinical manifestations, histological features, immunohistochemistry results and follow-up of a case of primary EA of the bladder were analyzed：Relevant literature from 1998 up to 2021 were searched on PubMed， and 17 cases with relatively complete clinical and follow-up data reported in the literature were summarized. Results: Primary EA of the bladder is rare, males tend to occur (male: female, 15∶3), the median age at presentation was 65 years (range, 32-85 years), and 8 patients (8/18 cases)(44.4%) had a clear history of radiotherapy to the pelvis. Most of them had local recurrence and distant metastasis within a short period of time. During follow-up 12 of the 18 cases (66.7%) died of disease, with a median survival of 6 months (range, 5 weeks to 19 months), 6 of 18 cases (33.3%) survived with or without disease, the follow-up time ranged from 3 months to 32 months. Histologically, the tumors were composed of sheets and sinusoid of highly atypical epithelioid cells. Tumor cells were pleomorphic with amphophilic cytoplasm. Mitotic activity was high and pathological mitotic could be seen. Intracytoplasmic lumens or vacuoles were present with occasional red blood cell within the vacuole. A hemorrhagic background was present. Immunostaining was positive for Vimentin, CD31, CD34, ERG, Fli-1 and CK-P, with partly positivity for CK7, Ki-67 hot spot about 40%. Conclusions: Bladder primary EA is rare. Some patients have a history of pelvis radiotherapy and are highly malignant. The therapentic effect and prognosis are not satisfied. Radical surgery combined with radiotherapy and chemotherapy and other treatment options may prolong survival. Because the immunohistochemical staining of cytokeratin is positive, it is easy to be misdiagnosed as high-grade cancer. It needs to be differentiated from post-radiotherapy sarcoma, sarcomatoid carcinoma, pseudoangiosarcomatoid urothelial carcinoma, epithelioid hemangioendothelioma, et al.

Abstract Background This multicenter phase 1b/2 trial aimed to explore the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), activity, and safety of anlotinib plus chemotherapy in patients with T790M‐negative epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)‐mutant advanced nonsquamous non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after resistance to first‐ or second‐generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Methods In the phase 1b stage, patients received anlotinib (8/10/12 mg, days 1–14) combined with cisplatin (75 mg/m2, day 1) or carboplatin (AUC = 5, day 1) plus pemetrexed (500 mg/m2, day 1) for a 3‐week cycle based on a 3 + 3 dose‐escalation design. In the phase 2 single‐arm stage, anlotinib was administered at MTD combined with platinum plus pemetrexed for four cycles, followed by anlotinib maintenance therapy. The primary endpoint of the phase 2 stage was progression‐free survival (PFS). Results The study was prematurely terminated due to slow accrual after 19 patients had been enrolled between January 18, 2019, and March 21, 2021. The MTD of anlotinib was 12 mg. The median PFS was 5.75 (95% confidence interval, 4.37–7.52) months. The objective response rate was 47.4% (95% confidence interval, 24.5%–71.1%). In the 12 mg group, seven (58.3%) patients experienced grade 3–4 treatment‐related adverse events, and the most common ones were hypertension (6 [50.0%]), decreased platelet count (2 [16.7%]), and hypertriglyceridemia (1 [8.3%]). No treatment‐related deaths occurred. Conclusion Anlotinib plus platinum and pemetrexed showed promising antitumor activity with manageable toxicity in patients with T790M‐negative EGFR‐mutant advanced nonsquamous NSCLC after progression on first‐ or second‐generation EGFR TKIs.