Search

Objective: To explore the feasibility and accuracy of ultrasound volume navigation (UVN) combined with X-ray fluoroscopy-guided percutaneous pedicle screw implantation through a prospective randomized controlled study., Methods: Patients with thoracic and lumbar vertebral fractures scheduled for percutaneous pedicle screw fixation between January 2022 and January 2023 were enrolled. Among them, 60 patients met the selection criteria and were included in the study. There were 28 males and 32 females, with an average age of 49.5 years (range, 29-60 years). The cause of injury included 20 cases of traffic accidents, 21 cases of falls, 17 cases of slips, and 2 cases of heavy object impact. The interval from injury to hospital admission ranged from 1 to 5 days (mean, 1.57 days). The fracture located at T 12 in 15 cases, L 1 in 20 cases, L 2 in 19 cases, and L 3 in 6 cases. The study used each patient as their own control, randomly guiding pedicle screw implantation using UVN combined with X-ray fluoroscopy on one side of the vertebral body and the adjacent segment (trial group), while the other side was implanted under X-ray fluoroscopy (control group). A total of 4 screws and 2 rods were implanted in each patient. The implantation time and fluoroscopy frequency during implantation of each screw, angle deviation and distance deviation between actual and preoperative planned trajectory by imaging examination, and the occurrence of zygapophysial joint invasion were recorded., Results: In terms of screw implantation time, fluoroscopy frequency, angle deviation, distance deviation, and incidence of zygapophysial joint invasion, the trial group showed superior results compared to the control group, and the differences were significant ( P <0.05)., Conclusion: UVN combined with X-ray fluoroscopy-guided percutaneous pedicle screw implantation can yreduce screw implantation time, adjust dynamically, reduce operational difficulty, and reduce radiation damage.

Background: Percutaneous pedicle screw (PPS) placement is an established technique for minimally invasive surgery. However, life-threatening hematomas may occur in osteoporotic patients undergoing percutaneous screw placement., Case Description: An 80-year-old female with an osteoporotic T10 chance fracture developed a life-threatening hematoma following a T8-L3 posterior fusion performed with PPS. Prompt angiography diagnosed a life-threatening hematoma attributed to laceration of the left third lumbar artery occurring following pedicle screw (PS) placement into an osteoporotically fractured left L3 transverse process. This was immediately and successfully embolized., Conclusion: An 80-year-old female with multiple lumbar osteoporotic fractures developed a life-threatening hematoma during a T8-L3 PS fusion. When the lumbar computed tomography angiography diagnosed a laceration of the left L3 lumbar artery, immediate transarterial embolization proved life-saving., Competing Interests: There are no conflicts of interest., (Copyright: © 2023 Surgical Neurology International.)

Objective: While single-position surgery (SPS) eliminates the need for patient repositioning, the placement of screws in the unconventional lateral position poses unique challenges related to asymmetry relative to the surgical table. Use of robotic guidance or intraoperative navigation can help to overcome this. The aim of this study was to compare the relative accuracies offered by these various navigation modalities for pedicle screws placed in lateral SPS., Methods: According to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, the PubMed/Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were queried for studies reporting pedicle screw placement accuracy using fluoroscopic, CT-navigated, O-arm, or robotic guidance in lateral SPS, and a systematic review and meta-analysis was performed. Included studies all compared evaluated screw placement accuracy in lateral SPS using a single navigation method. Quality assessment was performed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system; risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and the Joanna Briggs Institute checklist. The primary outcome, rate of pedicle screw breach, was analyzed using random-effects meta-analysis., Results: Eleven studies were included comprising 548 patients who underwent the placement of instrumentation with 2488 screws. For the fluoroscopic, CT-navigated, O-arm, and robotic guidance cohorts, there were 3, 2, 3, and 3 studies, respectively. Breach rates by modality were as follows: fluoroscopic guidance (6.6%), CT navigation (4.7%), O-arm (3.9%), and robotic guidance (3.9%). Random-effects meta-analysis showed a significant difference between studies, with an overall breach rate of 4.9% (95% CI 3.1%-7.5%; p < 0.001); however, testing for subgroup differences failed to show a significant difference between guidance modalities (QM = 0.69, df = 3; p = 0.88). Heterogeneity between studies was significant (I2 = 79.0%, τ2 = 0.41, χ2 = 47.65, df = 10; p < 0.001)., Conclusions: Robotic guidance of screws is noninferior to alternative guidance modalities in lateral SPS; however, additional prospective studies directly comparing different guidance types are merited.

Study Design. Retrospective study. Objective. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of local chemotherapy combined with percutaneous pedicle screw in adjacent vertebra in the treatment of spine tuberculosis (TB). Summary of Background Data. Despite the increased treatment concepts and surgical methods, the management of TB, which is increasing in prevalence, remains challenging. Considerable complications existing in the conventional debridement surgery with TB spondylitis requires more attention. Methods. A retrospective evaluation containing 34 cases of spinal TB (17 males, 17 females; average age 59 years; 14 thoracic TB, 11 thoracolumbar TB, nine lumbar TB) between April 2007 and August 2014 was conducted. All patients were treated with local chemotherapy combined with percutaneous pedicle screw in adjacent vertebrae. The ASIA grade, the Cobb angle, and complications were investigated. Results. All the patients were followed with an average of 18 (range, 12-52) months and were successfully treated without radiculopathy or neurological complications, with 27 excellent and seven fair outcomes at the final follow-up. One case that developed serious abscess in the primary focus underwent anterior focus debridement and bone graft fusion and recovered to the grade of fine at the final following up. As for kyphotic deformity, there was no Cobb angle loss. No other obvious complications were observed in all the patients. Conclusion. Local chemotherapy combined with percutaneous pedicle screw in adjacent vertebrae seems an effective method to treat spine TB, with some advantages including smaller trauma, fine neurologic recovery, few complications, and no Cobb angle loss. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: In the last decade, posterior instrumented fusion using percutaneous pedicle screws (PPSs) had been growing in popularity, and its safety and good clinical results have been reported. However, there have been few previous reports of the accuracy of PPS placement compared with that of conventional open screw insertion in an institution. This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of PPS placement compared with that of conventional open technique.Materials and Methods: One hundred patients were treated with posterior instrumented fusion of the thoracic and lumbar spine from April 2008 to July 2013. Four cases of revised instrumentation surgery were excluded. In this study, the pedicle screws inserted below Th7 were investigated, therefore, a total of 455 screws were enrolled. Two hundred and ninety-three pedicle screws were conventional open-inserted screws (O-group) and 162 screws were PPSs (P-group). We conducted a comparative study about the accuracy of placement between the two groups. Postoperative computed tomography scans were carried out to all patients, and the pedicle screw position was assessed according to a scoring system described by Zdichavsky et al. (Eur J Trauma 30:241-247, 2004; Eur J Trauma 30:234-240, 2004) and a classification described by Wiesner et al. (Spine 24:1599-1603, 1999).Results: Based on Zdichavsky's scoring system, the number of grade Ia screws was 283 (96.6 %) in the O-group and 153 (94.4 %) in the P-group, whereas 5 screws (1.7 %) in the O-group and one screw (0.6 %) in the P-group were grade IIIa/IIIb. Meanwhile, the pedicle wall penetrations based on Wiesner classification were demonstrated in 20 screws (6.8 %) in the O-group, and 12 screws (7.4 %) in the P-group. No neurologic complications were observed and no screws had to be replaced in both groups.Conclusions: The PPSs could be ideally inserted without complications. There were no statistically significant differences about the accuracy between the conventional open insertion and PPS placement. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The aim of the present prospective study is to evaluate whether the touted advantages of minimal invasive-transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MI-TLIF) translate into superior, equal, or inferior outcomes as compared to open-transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (O-TLIF). This is the first study from the Indian subcontinent prospectively comparing the outcomes of MI-TLIF and O-TLIF. Materials and Methods: All consecutive cases of open and MI-TLIF were prospectively followed up. Single-level TLIF procedures for spondylolytic and degenerative conditions (degenerative spondylolisthesis, central disc herniations) operated between January 2011 and January 2013 were included. The pre and postoperative Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and visual analog scale (VAS) for back pain and leg pain, length of hospital stay, operative time, radiation exposure, quantitative C-reactive protein (QCRP), and blood loss were compared between the two groups. The parameters were statistically analyzed (using IBM® SPSS® Statistics version 17). Results: 129 patients underwent TLIF procedure during the study period of which, 71 patients (46 MI-TLIF and 25 O-TLIF) fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Of these, a further 10 patients were excluded on account of insufficient data and/or no followup. The mean followup was 36.5 months (range 18-54 months). The duration of hospital stay (O-TLIF 5.84 days + 2.249, MI-TLIF 4.11 days + 1.8, P< 0.05) was shorter in MI-TLIF cases. There was less blood loss (open 358.8 ml, MI 111.81 ml, P< 0.05) in MI-TLIF cases. The operative time (O-TLIF 2.96 h + 0.57, MI-TLIF 3.40 h + 0.54, P < 0.05) was longer in MI group. On an average, 57.77 fluoroscopic exposures were required in MI-TLIF which was significantly higher than in O-TLIF (8.2). There was no statistically significant difference in the improvement in ODI and VAS scores in MI-TLIF and O-TLIF groups. The change in QCRP values preoperative and postoperative was significantly lower (P in MI< 0.000) in -TLIF group than in O-TLIF group, indicating lesser tissue trauma. Conclusion: The results in MI TLIF are comparable with O-TLIF in terms of outcomes. The advantages of MI-TLIF are lesser blood loss, shorter hospital stay, lesser tissue trauma, and early mobilization. The challenges of MI-TLIF lie in the steep learning curve and significant radiation exposure. The ultimate success of TLIF lies in the execution of the procedure, and in this respect the ability to achieve similar results using a minimally invasive technique makes MI-TLIF an attractive alternative. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy of three different surgical procedures in the treatment of type A thoracolumbar fractures.Materials and Methods: Between September 2012 and January 2015, a total of 90 patients with type A thoracolumbar fractures were randomly assigned into three groups of 30 each. Patients in group A, B, and C were treated with three-level percutaneous fixation, two-level percutaneous fixation, and three-level open fixation, respectively. Blood loss, duration of surgery, VAS scores, Cobb angles, and anterior height ratios of fractured vertebrae were collected for statistical analysis.Results: The average follow-up was 17.7 months. Post-operative Cobb angles were significantly corrected and anterior height ratios of fractured vertebrae were well restored in all three groups (p < 0.01). Back pain was efficiently relieved according to VAS score change (p < 0.01). There were significant differences in values of blood loss and post-operative VAS scores (at three months) between group A and group C (p < 0.01). No significant difference concerning post-operative anterior height ratios of fractured vertebrae, Cobb angles and correction losses was observed between group A and group B (p = 0.580, 0.840, 0.215, respectively).Conclusion: Percutaneous fixation not only provides the same reduction effect as open fixation, but also has an advantage of causing less operation related trauma which is beneficial to post-operative rehabilitation. The efficacy of three-level percutaneous fixation and two-level percutaneous fixation in the treatment of type A thoracolumbar fractures is not significantly different. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: The goal of this study was to compare the accuracy and cranial facet joint violation rates between percutaneous pedicle screw placements using conventional fluoroscopy and intraoperative 3-D CT (O-arm) computer navigation.Methods: We reviewed 194 pedicle screw of 28 consecutive patients who underwent minimally invasive lumbar or thoracic spinal stabilization. The accuracy of screw placement was evaluated according to two criteria published by Neo et al. and Upendra et al. Facet joint violation was evaluated according to the classification described by Babu et al.Results: Upon Neo grading, CFT group had 19.4 % (14/72) pedicle breach rate and CT-IGN group had a 5.7 % (7/122) pedicle breach rate (p < 0.005). The same sets of screws were also assessed using the outcome-based classification established by Upendra. There were no screw caused neurovascular injuries (type 3 = 0) in both groups. The results showed that 87.5 % (63/72) screws had acceptable placements (type I) and 12.5 % (9/72) had unacceptable placements (type II) in CFT group. In contrast, 94.3 % (115/122) screw had acceptable placements (type I) and only 5.7 % (7/122) had unacceptable placements (type II) in CT-IGN group. Additionally, CFT group had a significantly higher facet joint violation rate of 30.5 % (11/36) than CT-IGN group that had a 3.8 % (3/79) violation rate (p < 0.005).Conclusion: This study indicated the use of intraoperative CT imaging (O-arm) navigation in PPS placement have very beneficial implications for MIS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Minimally invasive techniques aimed at minimizing surgery-associated risk and morbidity of spinal surgery have increased in popularity in recent years. Their potential advantages include reduced length of hospital stay, blood loss, and requirement for post-operative analgesia and earlier return to work. One such minimally invasive technique is the use of percutaneous pedicle screw fixation, which is paramount for promoting rigid and stable constructs and fusion in the context of trauma, tumors, deformity and degenerative disease. Percutaneous pedicle screw insertion can be an intimidating prospect for surgeons who have only been trained in open techniques. One of the ongoing challenges of this percutaneous system is to provide the surgeon with adequate access to the pedicle entry anatomy and adequate tactile or visual feedback concerning the position and anatomy of the rod and set-screw construct. This review article discusses the history and evolution of percutaneous pedicle screw retractor technologies and outlines the advances over the last decade in the rapidly expanding field of minimal access surgery for posterior pedicle screw based spinal stabilization. As indications for percutaneous pedicle screw techniques expand, the nuances of the minimally invasive surgery techniques and associated technologies will also multiply. It is important that experienced surgeons have access to tools that can improve access with a greater degree of ease, simplicity and safety. We here discuss the technical challenges of percutaneous pedicle screw retractor technologies and a variety of systems with a focus on the pros and cons of various retractor systems. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We investigated the clinical and radiological results of percutaneous pedicle screw fixation in the management of spinal trauma and metastatic tumours. A retrospective analysis was performed on a series of 14 patients who were operated on from March 2009 to November 2011 by a single surgeon (RJM). Following a radiological review (CT scan/MRI), six patients underwent short segment fixation, while the remaining underwent long segment fixation. All patients had routine follow-ups at 4, 6, 12 months, and annually thereafter. Clinical examinations were conducted preoperatively and postoperatively, and the length of operation, blood loss, and postoperative pain relief were recorded. There was a single patient with an incision site complication. The mean blood loss was 269 mL. All of the parameters demonstrated no significant differences between the trauma and the tumour groups ( p = 0.10). The neurological power scores improved for all patients, with the largest increase being from a score of 2 to 4. At follow-up, the majority of patients had returned to their previous activities and had reduced pain scores. One patient suffered high pain levels from other medical conditions that were not related to the operation. Minimally invasive pedicle screw fixation is a suitable option for patients with spinal tumours and fractures, with acceptable safety and efficacy in this small retrospective patient series. We have seen favourable results in our patients, who have experienced an increased quality of life following their surgery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Study Design. A retrospective clinical and radiographical study. Objective. To assess the clinical outcomes and fusion rate of facet fusion (FF) for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis (DLS). Summary of Background Data. On the basis of the long-term clinical and radiological follow-up studies of posterolateral fusion (PLF)-that is, intertransverse process fusion with pedicle screw instrumentation-for DLS, we recognized that FF alone would be sufficient for spinal fusion. Methods. Eighty-eight patients who underwent FF for single-level DLS were retrospectively reviewed after at least 1 year of followup. The control group comprised 21 patients who underwent conventional PLF. The operative technique involved a 5-cm midline skin incision, bilateral laminar fenestration, and FF with autologous bone harvested from the spinous process. Percutaneous pedicle screws were then inserted through the fascia. The fusion rate of FF was evaluated using computed tomography, and the change in the range of motion at the fused level was assessed on flexion-extension lateral radiographs. The Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire was used to assess the therapeutic effectiveness of FF. The results of the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire and the visual analogue scales of low back pain, buttock and lower limb pain, and buttock and lower limb numbness were evaluated. Results. The fusion rate was 88.6% (78/88 cases). Among 10 patients with inadequate fusion, the average range of motion significantly decreased from 14.4 ° preoperatively to 4.3° postoperatively. The Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire category scores demonstrated therapeutic effectiveness in 93.0% of the patients for walking ability and in 73.0% of the patients for low back pain. The average preoperative scores of the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire and the visual analogue scales of low back pain, buttock and lower limb pain, and buttock and lower limb numbness were significantly reduced postoperatively in the FF group. Conclusion. FF achieved good clinical outcomes that were superior to those of conventional PLF with a comparable fusion rate. It is useful for managing DLS and is a minimally invasive evolution of PLF. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Percutaneous pedicle screw instrumentation is a minimally invasive surgical technique; however, the effects of using percutaneous pedicle screw fixation in treating patients with spinal infections have not yet been well demonstrated. The aim of this study, therefore, was to determine whether percutaneous posterior pedicle screw instrumentation is superior to the traditional open approach in treating pyogenic spondylodiscitis. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed data for 45 patients treated for pyogenic spondylodiscitis with anterior debridement and interbody fusion followed by a second-stage procedure involving either traditional open posterior pedicle screw fixation or percutaneous posterior pedicle screw fixation. Twenty patients underwent percutaneous fixation and 25 patients underwent open fixation. Demographic, operative, and perioperative data were collected and analyzed Results: The average operative time for the percutaneous procedure was 102.5 minutes, while the average time for the open procedure was 129 minutes. The average blood loss for the percutaneous patients was 89 ml versus a 344.8 ml average for the patients in the open group. Patients who underwent the minimally invasive surgery had lower visual analogue scale scores and required significantly less analgesia afterwards. After two years of follow-up, neither recurrent infection nor intraoperative complications, such as wound infection or screw loosening, were found in the percutaneous group. Moreover, there was no significant difference in outcome between the two groups in terms of Oswestry Disability Index scores. Conclusions: Anterior debridement and interbody fusion with bone grafting followed by minimally invasive percutaneous posterior instrumentation is an alternative treatment for pyogenic spondylodiscitis which can result in less intraoperative blood loss, shorter operative time, and reduced postoperative pain with no adverse effect on infection control. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To assess a new intradermal locator device for percutaneous placement of lumbar pedicle screws. Material and methods: Patients were alternately assigned to two groups. The locator group underwent lumbar pedicle screw placement using the intradermal locator. The control group was aided by traditional fluoroscopy. Baseline demographics, visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores, operation time, intraoperative fluoroscopy time and guidewire insertion time were recorded. All postoperative CT scans were reviewed by an independent spine surgeon to grade screw placement accuracy. Results: Thirty-six patients (180 screws) were assigned to the locator group and 30 patients (128 screws) to the control group. The locator device could significantly reduce the fluoroscopy time [3.9 sec (SD = 1.9) vs. 9.6 sec (SD = 5.8), p < 0.001] and guidewire insertion time [2.69 min (SD = 0.67) vs. 4.49 min (SD = 1.96), p < 0.001] compared with the conventional method for each pedicle screw. The whole operation time of the locator group was shorter than that of the control group [2-segment: 243.2 min (SD = 16.9) vs. 301.7 min (SD = 14.9), p < 0.001; 1-segment: 154.5 min (SD = 14.3) vs. 194.6 min (SD = 19.3), p < 0.001]. As for the rates of pedicle breaches, postoperative VAS scores, no significant difference was found between the two groups. Conclusion: The intradermal locator device could help reduce the radiation exposure in percutaneous pedicle screw placement while maintaining the accuracy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Literature about long constructs in the cervicothoracic junction (CTJ) implanted with a minimally invasive surgical technique is practically nonexistent. Our objective is to present a less invasive-minimally invasive (LIS-MIS) surgical technique to stabilize the CTJ. Patients and Methods A midline cervical short incision was made, three or four level lateral mass screws were inserted bilaterally and rods were placed in a conventional technique (LIS field). Percutaneous screws were placed in the upper thoracic spine, and thoracic rods were threaded subfascially through the pedicle sleeves up to the cervical incision (MIS field). Cervical and thoracic rods were linked with parallel connectors. Two cross-links were used in each case. Results Two patients (33 and 53 years of age) with instability of the CTJ due to metastases were operated on in this way without attempting bone fusion. Mean duration of surgery was 7.5 hours. No patient required blood transfusion. There were no complications related to surgery or the hardware. Opioid consumption diminished after surgery, and both patients remained ambulatory until decease. Conclusion This LIS-MIS technique seems feasible to stabilize the CTJ in very selected cases when fusion is not necessary. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Although stimulus evoked electromyography (EMG) is commonly used to confirm the accuracy of pedicle screw placement. There are no studies to differentiate between solid screws and hollow screws to the electrical resistance of pedicle screws. We speculate that the electrical resistance of the solid and hollow pedicle screws may be different and then a potential source of error with stimulus-evoked EMG may happen. Materials and Methods: Resistance measurements were obtained from 12 pedicle screw varieties (6 screws of each manufacturer) across the screw shank based on known constant current and measured voltage. The voltage was measured 5 times at each site. Results: Resistance of all solid screws ranged from 0.084 Ω to 0.151 Ω (mean =0.118 ± 0.024 Ω ) and hollow screws ranged from 0.148 Ω to 0.402 Ω (mean = 0.285 ± 0.081 Ω ). There was a significant difference of resistance between the solid screws and hollow screws (P < 0.05). The screw with the largest diameter no matter solid screws or hollow screws had lower resistance than screws with other diameters. No matter in solid screws group or hollow screws group, there were significant differences (P < 0.05) between the 5.0 mm screws and 6.0 mm screws, 6.0 mm screws and 7.0 mm screws, 5.0 mm screws and 7.0 mm screws, 4.5 mm screws and 5.5 mm screws, 5.5 mm screws and 6.5 mm screws, 4.5 mm screws and 6.5 mm screws. The resistance of hollow screws was much larger than the solid screws in the same diameter group (P < 0.05). Conclusions: Hollow pedicle screws have the potential for high electrical resistance compared to the solid pedicle screws and therefore may affect the EMG response during stimulus ‑ evoked EMG testing in pedicle screw fixation especially in minimally invasive percutaneous pedical screw fixation surgery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Thoracic percutaneous pedicle screw (PPS) fixation is technically challenging because of the complexity of the spinal anatomy involved. Furthermore, owing to the proximity of critical neurovascular structures, serious complications have been reported because of misplaced thoracic pedicle screws. Therefore, it is important to know the factors associated with the misplacement of thoracic PPS, but there have been few reports to date., Methods: The present study included 663 PPSs inserted from T4 to T12 in 127 patients. The accuracy of pedicle screw placement was assessed using computed tomography (CT) scans conducted within two weeks postoperatively. We compared the screws in the misplaced group (Group M) and the optimal placed group (Group O) for sex, age, body mass index, the consecutive surgery numbers, type of disease, instrumented level, laterality, the pedicle diameter, the inclination angle of the transverse process, and Hounsfield units (HU) at the base of the transverse processes of the instrumented vertebrae., Results: Screw misplacement was observed in 28 (4%) of 663 screws on CTs conducted within two weeks postoperatively. In univariate analysis, there was a statistically significant difference between Group M (n=25) and Group O (n=638) for insertion level, the pedicle diameter, and the HU value of the transverse process. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, T4-6 level (T4-6; odds ratio [OR]=12.083, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.219-45.355) and greater HU value at the transverse process (OR=1.009, 95% CI: 1.004-1.014) were identified as independent factors associated with the misplacement of thoracic PPS., Conclusions: The misplacement of thoracic PPS was observed in 28 (4%) of 663 screws. The vertebral level (T4-6) and greater HU values at the base of the transverse process were identified as independent factors associated with the misplacement of thoracic PPS., Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest: The author did not receive and will not receive any benefits or funding from any commercial party related directly or indirectly to the subject of this article., (Copyright © 2023 The Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research.)

Purpose: Lumbar fusion using lateral single position surgery (LSPS) gained popularity during the last few years. While prone percutaneous pedicle screw placement is well described, placing percutaneous pedicle screws with the patient in the lateral position is considered the most complicated part of LSPS. In this article we describe the fluoroscopy navigated technique for lateral percutaneous screw placement using the tunnel view technique., Methods: The radiologic background and principles of the tunnel view technique are described. In addition, the special positioning of the patient, the C-arm and the surgical technique is discussed in detail., Results: This technique is used as the standard for percutaneous screw placement in the prone or lateral positions in our department since 2017. Since the introduction of this technique we have had 0% reoperation rate for symptomatic malpositioned pedicle screws., Conclusion: The tunnel view technique simplifies pedicle screw placement while allowing for permanent observation of pedicle walls and the superior joint surface during placement of the Jamshidi needle. It also allows for confirmation of intrapedicular position of the screw after its implantation. This technique is safe and feasible in our clinical experience., (© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Introduction: In order to minimize perioperative invasiveness and improve the patients' functional capacity of daily living, we have performed minimally invasive lumbar decompression and posterolateral fusion (MIS-PLF) with percutaneous pedicle screw fixation for degenerative spondylolisthesis with spinal stenosis. Although several minimally invasive fusion procedures have been reported, no study has yet demonstrated the efficacy of MIS-PLF in degenerative spondylolisthesis of the lumbar spine. This study prospectively compared the mid-term clinical outcome of MIS-PLF with those of conventional PLF (open-PLF) focusing on perioperative invasiveness and patients' functional capacity of daily living. Materials and methods: A total of 80 patients received single-level PLF for lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis with spinal stenosis. There were 43 cases of MIS-PLF and 37 cases of open-PLF. The surgical technique of MIS-PLF included making a main incision (4 cm), and neural decompression followed by percutaneous pedicle screwing and rod insertion. The posterolateral gutter including the medial transverse process was decorticated and iliac bone graft was performed. The parameters analyzed up to a 2-year period included the operation time, intra and postoperative blood loss, Oswestry-Disability Index (ODI), Roland-Morris Questionnaire (RMQ), the Japanese Orthopaedic Association score, and the visual analogue scale of low back pain. The fusion rate and complications were also reviewed. Results: The average operation time was statistically equivalent between the two groups. The intraoperative blood loss was significantly less in the MIS-PLF group (181 ml) when compared to the open-PLF group (453 ml). The postoperative bleeding on day 1 was also less in the MIS-PLF group (210 ml) when compared to the open-PLF group (406 ml). The ODI and RMQ scores rapidly decreased during the initial postoperative 2 weeks in the MIS-PLF group, and consistently maintained lower values than those in the open-PLF group at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively. The fusion rate was statistically equivalent between the two groups (98 vs. 100%), and no major complications occurred. Conclusion: The MIS-PLF utilizing a percutaneous pedicle screw system is less invasive compared to conventional open-PLF. The reduction in postoperative pain led to an increase in activity of daily living (ADL), demonstrating rapid improvement of several functional parameters. This superiority in the MIS-PLF group was maintained until 2 years postoperatively, suggesting that less invasive PLF offers better mid-term results in terms of reducing low back pain and improving patients' functional capacity of daily living. The MIS-PLF utilizing percutaneous pedicle screw fixation serves as an alternative technique, eliminating the need for conventional open approach. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Percutaneous techniques may be helpful to reduce approach-related morbidity of conventional open surgery. The aim of the study was to evaluate the feasibility and safety of mini-open posterior lumbar interbody fusion for instabilities and degenerative disc diseases. From May 2005 until October 2008, 20 patients affected by monosegmental instability and disc herniation underwent mini-open lumbar interbody fusion combined with percutaneous pedicle screw fixation of the lumbar spine. Clinical outcome was assessed using the Visual Analog Scale, Oswestry Disability Index, and Short Form Health Survey-36. The mean follow-up was 24 months. The mean estimated blood loss was 126 ml; the mean length of stay was 5.3 days; the mean operative time was 171 min. At 24-month follow-up, the mean VAS score was 2.1, mean ODI was 27.1%, and mean SF-36 was 85.2%. 80 screws were implanted in 20 patients. 74 screws showed very good position, 5 screws acceptable, and 1 screw unacceptable. A solid fusion was achieved in 17 patients (85%). In our opinion, mini-open TLIF is a valid and safe treatment of lumbar instability and degenerative disc diseases in order to obtain faster return to daily activities. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Background context: Protecting cranial facet joint is a modifiable risk factor that may decrease the incidence of adjacent segment disease after lumbar spinal fusion. Percutaneously instrumented screws may more frequently violate cranial facet joints because of the potential limitation of screw entry site selection. To our knowledge, however, there is no study that has evaluated the cranial facet joint violations adjacent to minimally invasive lumbar fusion related to percutaneously placed pedicle screws. Purpose: We investigated the incidence and relating factors of cranial facet joint violations by percutaneous pedicle screws. Study design/setting: A retrospective study of prospectively collecting data. Patient sample: The sample comprises 184 pedicle screws percutaneously placed at the cranial fusion segments in 92 patients who underwent minimally invasive lumbar spinal fusion. Outcome measures: The facet joint violations adjacent to a cranial fusion segment were examined on the postoperative computed tomography (CT) scans. Methods: Two independent observers retrospectively examined all the postoperative CT images. A facet joint was considered violated if any of the following situations were encountered: pedicle screw clearly within the facet joint; pedicle screw head clearly within the facet joint; and pedicle screw and/or screw head within 1 mm from or abutting the facet joint, without clear joint involvement. Results: The incidence of the violations was 50% (46/92) of all patients and 31.5% (58/184) of all screws, which were significantly higher than the previously reported rates with the traditional open procedure (50% vs. 23.5% of all patients, p<.001; 31.5% vs. 15.2% of all screws, p<.001). The violations occurred approximately 3.3 times more frequently at the most cranial pedicle screws of L5 pedicle than at the other pedicles (70.8% vs. 42.6%, odds ratio [OR]=3.3, p=.021). Logistic regression analysis revealed a significant trend toward reducing the incidence of the violations as increasing the year of surgery (OR=0.7, p=.008). The incidence showed no significant relationships with patients’ age, gender, body mass index, preoperative diagnosis, the number of fused segments, or the side of screw placement. Conclusions: Our data raise a concern about the higher incidence of cranial facet joint violations by percutaneously placed pedicle screws than that previously reported rates by traditionally instrumented screws. Furthermore, more care should be taken to avoid cranial facet joint violations when the surgeon is a novice to percutaneous pedicle screw placement and/or minimally invasive fusion surgery is considered at the L5–S1 segment. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Objective: percutaneous pedicle screw (PPS) fixation has been widely used in minimally invasive spine stabilization. Triggered electromyogram (TrEMG) monitoring is performed to prevent PPS misplacement, but is not widely accepted. We have newly developed an insulating tap device to minimize the misplacement of PPS. Methods: TrEMG was measurable in insulation tap devices in 31 cases, and in non-insulating tap devices in 27 cases. Fluoroscopy was used to insert 194 PPS and 154 PPS, respectively. Based on the Rampersaud classification of postoperative computed tomography, we classified PPS insertion into four categories (Grade A as no violation, Grade D as more than 4 mm perforation). Results: Grade A was noted in 168 PPSs (86.6%) and Grade B to D in 26 PPSs in the insulation tap device group, and Grade A was noted in 129 PPSs (83.8%) and Grade B to D in 25 PPSs in the non-insulating tap device group, respectively. At a cutoff value of 11 mA, the sensitivity was 41.4% and the specificity was 98.2%. The sensitivity and specificity of the non-insulating tap device were 4.0% and 99.2%, respectively. Conclusions: The insulation treatment of the tap device has improved the sensitivity of TrEMG. TrEMG using the insulating tap device is one of the methods for safe PPS insertion. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We compared radiological and clinical outcomes between multilevel lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) + hybrid posterior fixation (PF) and multilevel LLIF + conventional open PF in patients with adult spinal deformity (ASD). Patients who underwent minimally invasive surgery for ASD in a single institution between 2014 and 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Fifty-six patients (hybrid PF, 30; open PF, 26) who underwent ASD correction surgery were enrolled between 2014 and 2018. We evaluated patients' demographics, clinical outcomes, and radiographical parameters in each group. There was significantly less estimated blood loss in the hybrid PF group (662.8 mL vs. 1088.8 mL; p = 0.012). The CRP level 7 days after surgery was significantly lower in the hybrid PF group (2.9 mg/dL vs. 4.3 mg/dL; p = 0.035). There was no significant difference between the two groups in other demographic variables, visual analog scores for back pain and leg pain, Oswestry Disability Index, coronal Cobb angle, lumbar lordosis, pelvic tilt, pelvic incidence–lumbar lordosis mismatch, and sagittal vertical axis. There was a significantly higher percentage of major complications in the open PF group (42.3% vs. 13.3%; p = 0.039). Thus, LLIF + hybrid PF for ASD corrective surgery may be comparable to LLIF + open PF in terms of clinical and radiographic outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Objectives: There are few reports describing the radiographic correction of vertebral slippage in lateral interbody fusion and percutaneous pedicle screw fixation for lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis. [Objectives] We evaluated the intraoperative surgical correction obtained by lateral interbody fusion and percutaneous pedicle screw procedures. Materials and Methods: Fifty patients were included in this study. According to the Meyerding classification, 35 cases were Grade 1 and 15 cases were Grade 2. Mean age was 64.7 ± 6.4 years old. Seventeen cases were male, and 33 cases were female. The mean preoperative % slip was 21.1 ± 7.0%. After lateral interbody fusion, vertebral slippage was corrected using reduction technique by percutaneous pedicle screw. Results: The slippage of vertebra was reduced to 11.5 ± 6.5% after lateral interbody fusion procedure and 4.0 ± 6.0% after percutaneous pedicle screw procedure. One year after surgery, the slippage of vertebra was 4.1 ± 6.6%. The correction rate of lateral interbody fusion was 47.7 ± 25.1%, and that of percutaneous pedicle screw was 33.8 ± 2.6%. The total correction rate was 81.5 ± 27.7%. There was no significant loss of correction one year after surgery. The Japanese Orthopaedic Association Score significantly improved from 14.7 ± 4.2 to 27.7 ± 1.7 points at final follow up. No vascular or organ injury was observed during surgery, and there were no postoperative surgical site infections or systemic complications. Conclusion: Compared with previous reports, the final correction rate and the correction rate of the percutaneous pedicle screw procedure were particularly high in this study. Lateral interbody fusion and percutaneous pedicle screw using reduction technique provide excellent clinical and radiographic outcomes for patients with lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: The efficacy of minimally invasive surgeries for thoracolumbar flexion-distraction injuries (FDIs) has been reported, but those surgeries were monosegmental fusion surgeries of two adjacent vertebrae with bone grafts or temporary fixations using percutaneous pedicle screws (PPSs) that were at least bisegmental. Our idea was to fuse the fracture itself, not to fuse the fractured vertebra with an adjacent vertebra or to stabilize the fractured vertebra by bridging rostrally/caudally adjacent intact vertebrae, specifically when the displacement is minimal. This study aimed to present the surgical techniques of reduction and temporary monosegmental fixation of neurologically intact thoracolumbar bony FDIs using multiaxial PPSs, which can minimize the surgical invasiveness and preserve all motion segments, as well as report three cases treated with this procedure., Technical Note: When the fracture extended from the vertebral body to the spinous process at the same level, screws were placed into the fractured vertebra rostrally to the fracture along the rostral endplate, and the caudally adjacent vertebra was instrumented beyond the fracture line. When the fracture extended from the vertebral body to the spinous process of the rostrally adjacent vertebra, screws were placed into the fractured vertebra caudally to the fracture line, and the rostrally adjacent vertebra was instrumented. The kyphotic deformity was reduced through ligamentotaxis by using MPPSs in the rostral vertebra as rigid joysticks to apply direct buttress leverage to the rostral endplate. Intraoperative blood loss was minimal. The correction of kyphotic deformity and its durability were acceptable, and the segmental range of motion of the two affected vertebrae from flexion to extension was maintained after implant removal., Conclusions: This surgery can act as the least-invasive option for the management of thoracolumbar bony FDIs to allow early ambulation without external bracing and to preserve all the motion segments., Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare that there are no relevant conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2022 The Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research.)

Recently, there has been an increase in robotic-assisted spine fusion for degenerative spondylosis of the lumbar spine. We present the case of a 60-year-old female with grade 1 spondylolisthesis at L4/5 and L5/S1 who underwent L4-S1 anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) with percutaneous robotic-assisted pedicle screw fixation. We provide a detailed analysis of the procedure including the speed of robotic screw placement and pitfalls of this surgical approach., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist., (Copyright © 2022, McVeigh et al.)

Study Design: Retrospective study., Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare the accuracy of percutaneous pedicle screw (PPS) placement between prone and lateral decubitus positions during lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) and to evaluate the tendency of PPS positioning based on simple computed tomography measurements with patients in the lateral decubitus position., Overview of Literature: There is insufficient information in the literature regarding the accuracy of inserting a PPS using fluoroscopy in patients in the lateral decubitus position., Methods: We included 62 patients who underwent combined LLIF surgery and PPS fixation for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis with spinal canal stenosis. We compared the patient demographics and the accuracy of fluoroscopy-guided PPS placement between two groups: patients who remained in the lateral decubitus position for the pedicle screw fixation (single-position surgery [SPS] group) and those who were turned to the prone position (dual-position surgery [DPS] group)., Results: There were 40 patients in the DPS group and 22 in the SPS group. Of the 292 PPSs, only 12 were misplaced. In other words, 280/292 screws (95.9%) were placed correctly in the pedicle's cortical shell (grade 0). PPS insertion did not cause neurological, vascular, or visceral injuries in either group. The breach rates for the DPS and SPS groups were 4.1% (grade 1, 5 screws; grade 2, 3 screws; grade 3, 0 screw) and 4.1% (grade 1, 2 screws; grade 2, 2 screws; grade 3, 0 screw), respectively. Although there were no statistically significant differences, the downside PPS had more screw malpositioning than the upside PPS., Conclusions: We found that PPS insertion with the patient in the decubitus position under fluoroscopic guidance might be as safe and reliable a technique as PPS insertion in the prone position, with a misplacement rate similar to that previously published.

Study Design: Single-center retrospective study., Purpose: This study aims to evaluate the surgical invasiveness of single-segment posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) by comparing perioperative blood loss in PLIF with traditional pedicle screws (PS), cortical bone trajectory screws (CBT), and percutaneous pedicle screws (PPS)., Overview of Literature: Intraoperative blood loss has often been used to evaluate surgical invasiveness. However, in patients undergoing spinal surgery, more blood loss is observed postoperatively than intraoperatively. Therefore, evaluating surgical invasiveness using only the intraoperative bleeding volume may result in considerable underestimation of the actual surgical invasiveness., Methods: This study included patients who underwent single-segment PLIF between January 2012 and December 2017. In total, seven patients underwent PLIF with PS (PS-PLIF), nine underwent PLIF with CBT (CBT-PLIF), and 15 underwent PLIF with PPS (PPS-PLIF)., Results: No significant differences were noted in terms of operation time or intraoperative bleeding between the PS-PLIF, CBT-PLIF, and PPS-PLIF groups. However, the postoperative drainage volume in the PPS-PLIF group (210.1 mL; range, 50-367 mL) was determined to be significantly lower than that in the PS-PLIF (416.7 mL; range, 260-760 mL; p=0.002) and CBT-PLIF (421.1 mL; range, 180-890 mL; p=0.006) groups. In addition, the total amount of intraoperative bleeding and postoperative drainage was found to be significantly lower in the PPS-PLIF group (362.8 mL; range, 145-637 mL) than in the PS-PLIF (639.6 mL; range, 285-1,000 mL; p=0.01) and CBT-PLIF (606.7 mL; range, 270-950 mL; p=0.005) groups., Conclusions: Based on our findings, evaluating surgical invasiveness using only intraoperative bleeding can result in the underestimation of actual surgical invasiveness. Even with single-segment PLIF, the amount of perioperative bleeding can vary depending on the way the posterior instrument is installed.

Background: Thoracolumbar fractures have the characteristics of acute onset, rapid change, and severe trauma. The best way to treat thoracolumbar fractures is through fracture reduction surgery. The surgical methods include percutaneous pedicle screw, posterior percutaneous pedicle screw internal fixation, and open pedicle screw internal fixation., Methods: We searched the PubMed, Embase, and Medline English database from April 1991 to April 2021, and the keywords included "percutaneous tablet screen", "posterior percutaneous tablet screen fixation", "open tablet screen fixation", "fracture of thoracic vertebrae", "thoracic fractures", "thoracic", and "vascular fracture". RevMan5.3 provided by Cochrane was used for meta-analysis., Results: A total of 9 articles were included in this study. Percutaneous pedicle screw fixation and posterior percutaneous pedicle screw fixation were adopted as the surgical methods, and patients were enrolled into experimental and control groups. Open pedicle screw internal fixation was set as the control group. The mean difference (MD) of operation time, blood loss, pain score, postoperative complications, screw debris rate, and hospital stay were -0.73, -192.16, -0.70, 1.49, 0.32, and -1.26, respectively; 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were (-0.94, -0.51), (-213.23, -171.09), (-0.82, -0.57), (0.47, 4.79), (0.10, 0.99), and (-1.82, -0.71), respectively; Z values were 6.71, 17.87, 10.95, 0.67, 1.97, and 4.46, respectively; and P values were <0.00001, <0.00001, <0.00001, 0.50, 0.05, and <0.00001, respectively., Discussion: A total of 9 articles were included in this meta-analysis. Compared with open surgery, the use of percutaneous pedicle screw and posterior percutaneous pedicle screw fixation had less blood loss, shorter operation time, shorter hospital stay, less pain, as well as lower screw dislocation and postoperative infection rates, indicating that the use of percutaneous pedicle screw and posterior percutaneous pedicle screw fixation is more effective than open surgery.