Search

BackgroundTumor sidedness as a prognostic factor in advanced stage colon cancer (CC) is well established. The impact of tumor sidedness on the clinical outcomes of stage II and III CC has not been well studied.MethodsThe National Cancer Database (NCDB) was utilized to identify patients with pathological stage II and III primary adenocarcinoma of the colon from 2010 to 2015 using ICD-O-3 morphology and topography codes: 8140-47, 8210-11, 8220-21, 8260-63, 8480-81, 8490 and C18.0, 18.2,18.3, 18.5,18.6, 18.7. Univariate (UVA) and multivariable (MVA) survival analyses and Kaplan–Meier Curves with Log-rank test were utilized to compare overall survival (OS) based on tumor location and treatment received.ResultsA total of 35,071 patients with stage II (n = 17,629) and III (n = 17,442) CC were identified. 51.3% female; 81.5% Caucasian; median age 66 (range, 18–90). Majority of stage II and III tumors were right sided, 61.2% (n = 10,794) and 56.0% (n = 9,763). Microsatellite instability high (MSI-H) was more common in stage II compared to III, 23.3% (n = 4,115) vs 18.2% (n = 3,171) (p < 0.0001). In stage II MSI-H CC right was more common than left, 78.3% (n = 3223) vs 21.7% (n = 892). There was no significant difference in survival between stage II MSI-H left vs right (5-year OS 76.2 vs 74.7%, p = 0.1578). Stage II MSS CC right was more common than left, 56.0% (n = 7571) vs 44.0% (n = 5943), and survival was better in the left vs right (5-year OS 73.2 vs 70.8%, p = 0.0029). Stage III MSI-H CC was more common in the right than in the left, 75.6% (n = 2,397) vs 24.4% (n = 774) and survival was better in the left (5-year OS 62.5 vs 56.5%, p = 0.0026). Stage III MSS CC was more common in the right than in the left, 51.6% (n = 7,366) vs 48.4% (n = 6,905), and survival was better in the left vs right (5-year OS 67.0 vs 54.4%, p < 0.001).ConclusionSurvival was better in left sided tumors compared to right in stage II MSS, stage III MSS, and stage III MSI-H CC.

Background: In patients with synchronous colorectal cancer (SCRC), understanding the underlying molecular behavior of such cases is mandatory for designing individualized therapy. The aim of this paper is to highlight the importance of transdisciplinary evaluation of the pre- and post-operative assessment of patients with SCRCs, from imaging to molecular investigations. Methods: Six patients with SCRCs presented with two carcinomas each. In addition to the microsatellite status (MSS), the epithelial mesenchymal transition was checked in each tumor using the biomarkers β-catenin and E-cadherin, same as KRAS and BRAF mutations. Results: In two of the patients, the second tumor was missed at endoscopy, but diagnosed by a subsequent computed-tomography-scan (CT-scan). From the six patients, a total of 11 adenocarcinomas (ADKs) and one squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) were analyzed. All the examined carcinomas were BRAF-wildtype microsatellite stable tumors with an epithelial histological subtype. In two of the six cases, KRAS gene status showed discordance between the two synchronous tumors, with mutations in the index tumors and wildtype status in the companion ones. Conclusions: Preoperative CT-scans can be useful for detection of synchronous tumors which may be missed by colonoscopy. Where synchronous tumors are identified, therapy should be based on the molecular profile of the indexed tumors.

Immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) play a key role in the treatment of advanced stage colorectal cancer (CRC) patients featuring a deficient DNA mismatch repair (dMMR) system or a high microsatellite instability (MSI-H) profile. However, beyond the established role in CRC patients, ICIs have highly proven efficacy in other solid tumors featuring MSI-H/dMMR status represented by endometrial, gastric, ovarian, prostatic, and pancreatic carcinomas (EC, GC, OC, PrC, and PaC). Our aim was to compare the concordance rates among the Idylla™ MSI test, TapeStation 4200, and immunohistochemical (IHC) analysis in assessing MSI-H/dMMR status in EC, GC, OC, PrC, and PaC patients. The Sanger sequencing-based Titano MSI test was used in discordant cases. One hundred and eighty-five cases (n = 40 PrC, n = 39 GC, n = 38 OC, n = 35 PaC, and n = 33 EC) were retrospectively selected. MMR protein expression was evaluated by IHC. After DNA quality and quantity evaluations, the IdyllaTM and TapeStation 4200 platforms were adopted for the evaluation of MSI status. Remarkably, compared to IHC, the Idylla™ platform achieved a global concordance rate of 94.5% (154/163) for the microsatellite stable (MSS)/proficient MMR (pMMR) cases and 77.3% (17/22) for the MSI-H/dMMR cases. Similarly, a global concordance rate of 91.4% (149/163) and 68.2% (15/22) for MSS/pMMR and MSI-H/dMMR cases was also identified between IHC and the TapeStation 4200 microfluidic system. In addition, a global concordance of 93.1% (148/159) and 69.2% (18/26) for MSS/pMMR and MSI-H/dMMR cases was observed between the Idylla™ and TapeStation 4200 platforms. Discordant cases were analyzed using the Titano MSI kit. Overall, our data pinpointed a central role for molecular techniques in the diagnostic evaluation of dMMR/MSI-H status not only in CRC patients but also in other types of solid tumors.

Immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) has transformed the management of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) with mismatch-repair deficiency (dMMR) and microsatellite instability (MSI-H), though this constitutes on average less than 5% of mCRC, and ICI is ineffective in preserved MMR/microsatellite stable disease (pMMR/MSS). Here we review the efficacy of ICI in dMMR/MSI-H mCRC, poor response to ICI in pMMR/MSS mCRC, role for ICI in locally advanced disease, biomarkers of response, novel immunotherapies, and future directions in targeting resistance mechanisms.

Purpose: Colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence is increasing in adults younger than 50 years. This study evaluated clinicopathological characteristics and outcome of adolescent and young adult (AYA)-on...

Most colorectal cancers are microsatellite-stable with no response to anti-PD-1 therapy, necessitating the development of new immunomodulatory treatment strategies. Coinhibition of anti-PD-1 and STAT3 can elicit an effective antitumor response in a small subset of patients with microsatellite-stable colorectal cancer, and biomarkers predictive of response are under investigation. See related article by Kawazoe et al., p. 5887

Background: Microsatellite-stable (MSS) colon adenocarcinoma (COAD) patients are not sensitive to immune checkpoint inhibitors. Here, we focused on analyzing the relationship between homologous recombination repair (HRR)-related gene mutations and clinical immunotherapy responses in MSS COAD. Methods: The mutational landscape was profiled in a cohort of 406 Chinese COAD patients via next-generation sequencing (NGS). Correlations between HRR gene mutations and tumor immunity or clinical outcomes in two COAD genomic datasets were analyzed via bioinformatics. Results: In the Chinese cohort, seventy (17%) patients exhibited genomic alterations in HRR genes; ATM (9%), BRCA2 (4%), ATR (3%), RAD50 (3%) and BRIP1 (3%) were the most frequently mutated. In the MSK-IMPACT COAD cohort (immune checkpoint inhibitor-treated), HRR-mut patients (n=34) survived longer than HRR-wt patients (n=50) (log-rank P < 0.01). Based on the TCGA MSS COAD cohort, HRR gene mutations increased immune activities, such as infiltration of cytotoxic cells (P < 0.05) and exhausted CD8+ T cells (P < 0.01), and increased the IFN-γ scores (P < 0.05). The results differed in MSI-H COAD patients (all P > 0.05). Conclusion: HRR gene mutations significantly increased immune activities in MSS COAD patients, implying the feasibility of the HRR-mut status as an immunotherapy response predictor in MSS COAD.

Key Points Question Can combined immune checkpoint inhibition improve overall survival (OS) in patients with advanced refractory colorectal cancer (CRC)? Findings In this randomized phase 2 study with 180 patients randomized in a 2:1 ratio to tremelimumab and durvalumab plus best supportive care or best supportive care alone, the median OS was 6.6 months for durvalumab and tremelimumab and 4.1 months for best supportive care; correlative analysis revealed that patients with plasma tumor mutation burden (TMB) of 28 or more variants per megabase had the greatest OS benefit. Meaning Combined immune checkpoint inhibition may prolong OS in patients with advanced refractory CRC., This phase 2 randomized clinical trial evaluates the outcomes of combined immune checkpoint inhibition plus best supportive care vs best supportive care alone for patients with advanced colorectal cancer., Importance Single-agent immune checkpoint inhibition has not shown activities in advanced refractory colorectal cancer (CRC), other than in those patients who are microsatellite-instability high (MSI-H). Objective To evaluate whether combining programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte–associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) inhibition improved patient survival in metastatic refractory CRC. Design, Setting, and Participants A randomized phase 2 study was conducted in 27 cancer centers across Canada between August 2016 and June 2017, and data were analyzed on October 18, 2018. Eligible patients had histologically confirmed adenocarcinoma of the colon or rectum; received all available standard systemic therapies (fluoropyrimidines, oxaliplatin, irinotecan, and bevacizumab if appropriate; cetuximab or panitumumab if RAS wild-type tumors; regorafenib if available); were aged 18 years or older; had adequate organ function; had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1, and measurable disease. Interventions We randomly assigned patients to receive either 75 mg of tremelimumab every 28 days for the first 4 cycles plus 1500 mg durvalumab every 28 days, or best supportive care alone (BSC) in a 2:1 ratio. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary end point was overall survival (OS) and a 2-sided P

In an integrated genomic and clinical analysis, we evaluate the effects of Wnt and DNA damage response pathway alterations on metastatic colorectal cancer.

Summary Purpose This study aims to analyze sensitivities and polymorphisms of the Bethesda panel markers (BAT25, BAT26, D2S123, D5S346 and D17S250) for microsatellite instability testing in Chinese from Jiangsu Province and their clinical implication. Methods MSI, sensitivity and polymorphism analysis in 541 colorectal cancer (CRC) patients were detected by fragment analysis. Results Five hundred and twenty-five tissue samples and 541 blood samples of the 541 sample pairs were successfully amplified. Thirty-four (6.5%) cases were MSI-high (MSI-H) while 33 (6.3%) and 458 (87.2%) were MSI-low (MSI-L) and microsatellite stable (MSS), respectively. BAT26 (85.3%) exhibited the highest instability followed by BAT25 (82.4%), D2S123 (67.6%), D17S250 (64.7%) and D5S346 (50.0%) in MSI-H cases. The median ages of CRC patients with LS, MSI-H, MSI-L and MSS status were 38–43, 48, 60 and 63, respectively. 75.0%, 44.1%, 12.1% and 7.0% CRC cases were mucinous carcinomas in LS, MSI-H, MSI-L and MSS group, respectively. For D2S123, D17S250 and D5S346, heterozygosity was 80.8%, 74.1% and 57.7% and sizes of polymorphic variation range (PVR) were 207 bp to 234 bp, 140 bp to 169 bp and 109 bp to 137 bp, respectively. For D2S123 and D5S346, there was a bimodal distribution distinguishing the D17S250 from an indistinct trimodal or tetramodal distribution. Conclusion MSI-H cases showed earlier onset and higher proportion of mucinous carcinomas. Mononucleotide BAT26 and BAT25 exhibited higher sensitivity than dinucleotides D2S123, D17S250 and D5S346 in the Chinese population. The dinucleotide markers were highly polymorphic with high percent of heterozygosity, great variation in repeat length and non-normal distribution in Chinese population from Jiangsu Province.

Background Analysis of high microsatellite instability (MSI-H) phenotype in colorectal carcinoma (CRC) is important for evaluating prognosis and choosing a proper adjuvant therapy. Although the conventional MSI analysis methods such as polymerase chain reaction (PCR) fragment analysis and immunohistochemistry (IHC) show high specificity and sensitivity, there are substantial barriers to their use. Methods In this study, we analyzed the MSI detection performance of three molecular tests and IHC. For the molecular tests, we included a recently developed peptide nucleic acid probe (PNA)-mediated real-time PCR-based method using five quasi-monomorphic mononucleotide repeat markers (PNA method) and two conventional PCR fragment analysis methods using NCI markers (NCI method) or five quasi-monomorphic mononucleotide repeat markers (MNR method). IHC analysis was performed with four mismatch repair proteins. The performance of each method was validated in 166 CRC patient samples, which consisted of 76 MSI-H and 90 microsatellite stable (MSS) CRCs previously diagnosed by NCI method. Results Of the 166 CRCs, 76 MSI-H and 90 MSS CRCs were determined by PNA method. On the other hand, 75 MSI-H and 91 MSS CRCs were commonly determined by IHC and MNR methods. Based on the originally diagnosed MSI status, PNA showed 100% sensitivity and 100% specificity while IHC and MNR showed 98.68% sensitivity and 100% specificity. When we analyzed the maximum sensitivity of MNR and PNA method, which used the same five markers, PNA method could detect alterations in all five mononucleotide repeat markers in samples containing down to 5% MSI-H DNAs, whereas MNR required at least 20% MSI-H DNAs to achieve the same performance. Conclusions Based on these findings, we suggest that PNA method can be used as a practical laboratory test for the diagnosis of MSI. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s12885-018-5127-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Tumor mutational burden correlates with response to immune checkpoint blockade in multiple solid tumors, though in microsatellite stable tumors this association is weak and of limited clinical utility. Here, we uniformly analyzed whole exome sequencing (WES) of 249 tumors and matched normal tissue from patients with clinically annotated outcomes to immune checkpoint therapy, including radiographic response, across multiple cancer types to examine additional tumor genomic features that contribute to selective response. Our analyses identified genomic correlates of response beyond mutational burden, including somatic events in individual driver genes, certain global mutational signatures, and specific HLA-restricted neoantigens. However, these features were often inter-related, highlighting the complexity of identifying genetic driver events that generate an immunoresponsive tumor environment. This study lays a path forward in analyzing large clinical cohorts in an integrated and multifaceted manner to enhance our ability to discover clinically meaningful predictive features of response to immune checkpoint blockade.

BackgroundColon cancer (CRC) is the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths in the US. CRC incidence is on the rise and there is an alarming increase in young onset CRC cases. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have yielded promising anti-tumor results in microsatellite instable high (MSI-high) patients, which represent only 15% of tumors. The remaining 85% are denoted as microsatellite stable (MSS) and are unresponsive to ICI. Using a murine glioma model, our group has previously found the combination of anti-PD-1 and a transfer of hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) can sensitize mice that are resistant to anti-PD-1 alone. We evaluated survival after treatment with this combinatorial platform 3 or 5 days post-implantation in subcutaneous CRC-bearing mice and also phenotyped the splenic compartment of mice at endpoint.Methods1x106 MSS CRC cells, CT26, were subcutaneously injected into the right flank of BALB/cJ mice. 3 or 5 days later, HSCs were isolated from naïve BALB/cJ mice and injected through the tail vein into CT26-bearing mice and were also given 10 mg/kg anti-PD-1. Mice were given 3 additional doses of anti-PD-1 for a total of doses either every 3 or 5 days. Mice were sacrificed when tumors reached 1.5 cm at its widest point and spleens were excised and stained for flow cytometry.ResultsWhen mice were treated with HSC/anti-PD-1 3 days post-tumor implantation, we observed a statistically significant increase in survival in mice that received combinatorial HSCs and anti-PD-1 relative to no treatment control mice (p=0.0034, Mantel-Cox long-rank test) as well as mice that received HSCs alone (p=0.0462, Mantel-Cox log-rank test. In the same 3 day cohort, no differences in the frequency of T cell populations were observed. However, we found mice that received this combination therapy had a significant increase in the frequency of splenic CD11c+ MHC II+ dendritic cells (DCs) relative to no treatment control mice (p=0.0364, Mann-Whitney t test). When mice were treated with HSC/anti-PD-1 5 days post-tumor implantation, we found a statistically significant increase in survival of mice treated with combinatorial HSCs and anti-PD-1 compared to no treatment control mice (p=0.0024, Mantel-Cox log-rank test) and relative to mice that received HSC monotherapy (p=0.0462, Mantel-Cox log-rank test).ConclusionsThese results suggest combinatorial HSCs and anti-PD-1 represents a promising therapeutic axis in a murine model of MSS CRC. In addition, the increase in splenic DCs suggests the mechanism behind this anti-tumor response may be expansion of DCs within the periphery.Ethics ApprovalAll animal work approved through University of Florida IACUC # 201910777

Approximately 20% early-stage (I/II) colorectal cancer (CRC) patients develop metastases despite curative surgery. We aim to develop a formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded (FFPE)-based predictor of metastases in early-stage, clinically-defined low risk, microsatellite-stable (MSS) CRC patients. We considered genome-wide mRNA and miRNA expression and mutation status of 20 genes assayed in 150 fresh-frozen tumours with known metastasis status. We selected 193 genes for further analysis using NanoString nCounter arrays on corresponding FFPE tumours. Neither mutation status nor miRNA expression improved the estimated prediction. The final predictor, ColoMet19, based on the top 19 genes' mRNA levels trained by Random Forest machine-learning strategy, had an estimated positive-predictive-value (PPV) of 0.66. We tested ColoMet19 on an independent test-set of 131 tumours and obtained a population-adjusted PPV of 0.67 indicating that early-stage CRC patients who tested positive have a 67% risk of developing metastases, substantially higher than the metastasis risk of 40% for node-positive (Stage III) patients who are generally treated with chemotherapy. Predicted-positive patients also had poorer metastasis-free survival (hazard ratios [HR] = 1.92, design-set; HR = 2.05, test-set). Thus, early-stage CRC patients who test positive may be considered for adjuvant therapy after surgery.

ZusammenfassungEine Meningeosis neoplastica ist eine seltene, aber schwerwiegende Komplikation solider Neopasien (Melanome, Mamma-, Bronchial- oder gastrointestinale Karzinome). Die klinische Manifestation der Meningeosis ist äußerst variabel. Sie äußert sich z. B. in radikulären Schmerzen mit oder ohne neurologischen Ausfällen sowie in Kopfschmerzen bis hin zu halluzinatorischen Reizsymptomen. Ob dieses unspezifischen Symptomcharakters wird eine Meningeosis neoplastica häufig zu spät diagnostiziert und behandelt. Wir berichten hier über den seltenen Fall einer Patientin mit einem lymphatisch und ossär metastasierten BRAF-mutierten Mikrosatelliten-stabilen Kolonkarzinom, welche einen Monat nach der Diagnosestellung neurologische Reiz- und Ausfallsymptome entwickelte. Durch den zytologischen Nachweis von Tumorzellen im Liquorsediment konnte – trotz einer unauffälligen MRT-Diagnostik – eine Meningeosis carcinomatosa gesichert werden. Unter einer intrathekalen Therapie mit Methotrexat, kombiniert mit einer intensiven systemischen Antikörperchemotherapie, wurde passager eine gute partielle Remission der Tumorerkrankung erreicht. Ca. 8 Monate nach Therapiebeginn entwickelte jedoch die Patientin eine progrediente Meningeosis und verstarb wenige Wochen später.

The prognostic value of CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP) in colorectal cancer remains unsettled. We aimed to assess the prognostic value of this phenotype analyzing a total of 1126 tumor samples obtained from two Norwegian consecutive colorectal cancer series. CIMP status was determined by analyzing the 5-markers CAGNA1G, IGF2, NEUROG1, RUNX3 and SOCS1 by quantitative methylation specific PCR (qMSP). The effect of CIMP on time to recurrence (TTR) and overall survival (OS) were determined by uni- and multivariate analyses. Subgroup analyses were conducted according to MSI and BRAF mutation status, disease stage, and also age at time of diagnosis (

The introduction of checkpoint inhibitors provided remarkable achievements in several solid tumors but only 5% of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients, i.e., those with bearing microsatellite instable (MSI-high)/deficient DNA mismatch repair (dMMR) tumors, benefit from this approach. The favorable effect of immunotherapy in these patients has been postulated to be due to an increase in neoantigens due to their higher somatic mutational load, also associated with an abundant infiltration of immune cells in tumor microenvironment (TME). While in patients with dMMR tumors checkpoint inhibitors allow achieving durable response with dramatic survival improvement, current results in patients with microsatellite stable (MSS or MSI-low)/proficient DNA mismatch repair (pMMR) tumors are disappointing. These tumors show low mutational load and absence of “immune-competent” TME, and are intrinsically resistant to immune checkpoint inhibitors. Modifying the interplay among cancer cells, TME and host immune system is the aim of multiple lines of research in order to enhance the immunogenicity of pMMR mCRC, and exploit immunotherapy also in this field. Here, we focus on the rationale behind ongoing clinical trials aiming at extending the efficacy of immunotherapy beyond the MSI-high/dMMR subgroup with particular regard to academic no-profit studies.

Background: Grade 3 (G3, poorly differentiated) is an important treatment-decision factor in stage II colon cancer, but no unified diagnostic criteria are established. According to previous studies, an intra-tumoural poorly differentiated area with no glandular formation (POR) that fills the microscopic field of a 40× objective lens was an essential factor that defined G3. We aimed to prospectively validate this in a randomised controlled study of adjuvant chemotherapy (SACURA trial). Methods: Between 2006 and 2010, we enrolled 991 patients with stage II colon cancer from 123 institutions. POR was quantitatively graded according to the 40× objective lens rule and the intensity of poorly differentiated clusters (GradePOR). The prognostic power of GradePOR was compared with that of the conventional tumour grade based on the predominant histology rule (Gradeconv). Findings: According to GradePOR, 313, 526 and 152 tumours were classified as G1POR, G2POR and G3POR, respectively, and the 5-year relapse-free survival (RFS) rates were 91·1%, 82·9%, and 74·7%, respectively (P < 0·0001). When G3POR and G3conv were alternatively added to the standard prognostic model consisting of eight conventional factors, only G3POR was a significant factor for RFS (P = 0·040, Wald test). The adverse impact of G3POR on RFS was greater in the microsatellite stable (MSS)/microsatellite instability (MSI)-low subset (hazard ratio [HR], 2·61; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1·81–3·77) compared with that in the full analysis set (HR, 1·93; 95% CI, 1·34–2·77). In the MSS/MSI-low subset, the 5-year RFS rate of patients with G3POR tumours in the adjuvant chemotherapy group achieved greater improvement (9·1%) than the surgery-alone group (HR, 0·65; 95% CI, 0·34–1·24). Interpretation: The validated prognostic value of the least differentiation policy with the 40× objective lens rule may be highlighted as the diagnostic criterion for G3 in the adjuvant treatment setting for stage II colon cancer, particularly for MSS/MSI-low tumours. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00392899 Funding: This study was supported by the Foundation for Biomedical Research and Innovation at Kobe, Translational Research Center for Medical Innovation (TRI), under the funding contract with Taiho Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Japan. Declaration of Interests: MI has received consulting fees from Taiho Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., BristolMyers Squibb and Merck Serono Co. Ltd; honoraria from Taiho, Chugai Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., and Yakult Honsha Co. Ltd. HM has received consulting fees from Otsuka Pharmaceutical Factory, Inc. and Sysmex Co.; honoraria from Taiho, Chugai, Yakult Honsha, Daiichi Sankyo Co. Ltd., Astellas Pharma Inc. NT has received research funding from Taiho, Chugai, and Yakult Honsha; honoraria from Taiho, Chugai, Takeda Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Merck Serono. YS has received honoraria from Taiho, Chugai and Yakult Honsha. KT has received honoraria from Taiho and Takeda. KK has received consulting fees from Taiho and Chugai; honoraria from Taiho, Chugai, Bristol-Myers, Merck Serono and Otsuka. MW has received research funding from Taiho, Chugai, Yakult Honsha, Johnson and Johnson K. K. and Covidien Japan Co. Ltd. YK has received honoraria from Taiho and Chugai. H. Ueno has received honoraria from Taiho, Chugai, Yakult Honsha, BristolMyers and Daiichi Sankyo. TI has received research funding from Taiho; honoraria from Chugai. H. Uetake has received consulting fees, research funding, and honoraria from Taiho, Chugai, Takeda, Bristol-Myers and Merck Serono. SM has no competing interest. ST has received consulting fees from Taiho, Daiichi Sankyo and Solasia Pharma K. K.; research funding from Daiichi Sankyo, Yakult Honsha and Kureha Co. Ltd.; honoraria from Daiichi Sankyo. KS has received consultant fees, research funding and honoraria from Taiho, Chugai, Takeda, Yakult Honsha, Daiichi Sankyo, Bristol-Myers, Merck Serono, and Pfizer Co. Ltd. Ethics Approval Statement: The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Boards of each participating institution and was conducted in accordance with the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki and comparable Japanese ethical standards. Furthermore, written informed consent was obtained from all study participants.

PURPOSE:To predict microsatellite instability (MSI) status of colon cancer on preoperative CT imaging using radiomic analysis. METHODS:This retrospective study involved radiomic analysis of preoperative CT imaging of patients who underwent resection of stage II-III colon cancer from 2004 to 2012. A radiologist blinded to MSI status manually segmented the tumor region on CT images.254 Intensity-based radiomic features were extracted from the tumor region. Three prediction models were developed with (1) only clinical features, (2) only radiomic features, and (3) "combined" clinical and radiomic features. Patients were randomly separated into training (n = 139) and test (n = 59) sets. The model was constructed from training data only; the test set was reserved for validation only. Model performance was evaluated using AUC, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV. RESULTS:Of the total 198 patients, 134 (68%) patients had microsatellite stable tumors and 64 (32%) patients had MSI tumors. The combined model performed slightly better than the other models, predicting MSI with an AUC of 0.80 for the training set and 0.79 for the test set (specificity = 96.8% and 92.5%, respectively), whereas the model with only clinical features achieved an AUC of 0.74 and the model with only radiomic features achieved an AUC of 0.76. The model with clinical features alone had the lowest specificity (70%) compared with the model with radiomic features alone (95%) and the combined model (92.5%). CONCLUSIONS:Preoperative prediction of MSI status via radiomic analysis of preoperative CT adds specificity to clinical assessment and could contribute to personalized treatment selection.

Recent research has established tumor budding as a prognostic factor and a possible histomorphologic reflection of epithelial-mesenchymal transition in colorectal cancer, highlighting the ability of cancer cells exhibiting epithelial-mesenchymal transition to resist chemotherapy.This study aimed to investigate the clinical benefits of adjuvant chemotherapy according to the tumor budding status in microsatellite-stable stage III colorectal cancer.This was a retrospective study of 2 cohorts.The study was conducted at the National Defense Medical College in Japan.We reviewed 2 data sets of patients with microsatellite-stable stage III colorectal cancer with curatively intended surgery (R0) from 1999 to 2005 (first cohort; n = 203) and 2006 to 2012 (second cohort; n = 346). In both cohorts, 128 and 203 patients received 5-fluorouracil-based adjuvant chemotherapy and 75 and 143 patients did not.We assessed the benefits of adjuvant chemotherapy according to the grades of tumor budding based on the cancer-specific survival.In low-budding tumors, the chemotherapy group exhibited better cancer-specific survival than the surgery-alone group (first cohort, 93.1% vs 65.5%, p = 0.001; second cohort, 94.0% vs 76.0%, p0.0001). Conversely, the prognostic difference between the chemotherapy and surgery-alone groups was statistically insignificant in high-budding tumors (first cohort, 59.7% vs 52.4%, p = 0.57; second cohort, 83.1% vs 75.6%, p = 0.19). The multivariate analysis corroborated the benefits of adjuvant chemotherapy in low-budding tumors (first cohort, p = 0.002, HR = 0.28; second cohort, p0.0001, HR = 0.23) but not in high-budding tumors.Postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy and treatments for recurrence were not homogeneous, and the patient backgrounds differed between the chemotherapy and surgery alone groups.The high-budding group demonstrated resistance to 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy, whereas the low-budding group exhibited significant survival benefits from adjuvant chemotherapy in stage III colorectal cancer. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B14. BENEFICIOS DE SUPERVIVENCIA DIFERENCIAL DE LA QUIMIOTERAPIA ADYUVANTE BASADA EN 5-FLUOROURACILO PARA PACIENTES CON CÁNCER COLORRECTAL EN ESTADIO III ESTABLE CON MICROSATÉLITE SEGÚN EL ESTADO DE BROTACIÓN DEL TUMOR: UN ANÁLISIS RETROSPECTIVO:: Investigaciones recientes han establecido la aparición de tumores como un factor pronóstico y una posible reflexión histomorfológica de la transición epitelial-mesenquimatosa en el cáncer colorrectal, destacando la capacidad de las células cancerosas que presentan una transición epitelio-mesenquimática para resistir la quimioterapia.El objetivo de este estudio es investigar los beneficios clínicos de la quimioterapia adyuvante según el estado de brotación del tumor en el cáncer colorrectal en estadio III estable con microsatélite.Este fue un estudio retrospectivo de dos cohortes.El estudio se realizó en la Escuela de Medicina de la Defensa Nacional de Japón.Revisamos dos conjuntos de datos de pacientes con cáncer colorrectal en estadio III estable con microsatélite con cirugía de intención curativa (R0) de 1999 a 2005 (primera cohorte; n = 203) y 2006 a 2012 (segunda cohorte; n = 346). En ambas cohortes, 128 y 203 pacientes recibieron quimioterapia adyuvante basada en 5-fluorouracilo y 75 y 143 pacientes no, respectivamente.Evaluamos los beneficios de la quimioterapia adyuvante de acuerdo con los grados de brotación del tumor en función de la supervivencia específica del cáncer.n los tumores con brotes bajos, el grupo de quimioterapia mostró una mejor supervivencia específica al cáncer que el grupo con cirugía sola (primera cohorte, 93.1% vs. 65.5%, p = 0.001; segunda cohorte, 94.0% vs. 76.0%, p0.0001). A la inversa, la diferencia pronóstica entre los grupos de quimioterapia y cirugía sola fue estadísticamente insignificante en los tumores de brotes elevados (primera cohorte, 59.7% vs. 52.4%, p = 0.57; segunda cohorte, 83.1% vs. 75.6%, p = 0.19). El análisis multivariado corroboró los beneficios de la quimioterapia adyuvante en los tumores de brotes bajos (primera cohorte, p = 0,002, índice de riesgo: 0,28; segundo cohorte, p0,0001, índice de riesgo: 0,23) pero no en los tumores de alto brote.a quimioterapia adyuvante postoperatoria y los tratamientos para la recurrencia no fueron homogéneos, y los antecedentes de los pacientes difirieron entre los grupos de quimioterapia y cirugía sola.El grupo de alto brote demostró resistencia a la quimioterapia basada en 5-fluorouracilo, mientras que el grupo de bajo brote mostró beneficios significativos de supervivencia de la quimioterapia adyuvante en el cáncer colorrectal en estadio III. Vea el Resumen del Video en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B14.

Immunotherapy using checkpoint inhibitor targeting PD-1 and PD-L1 revolutionized the treatment of microsatellite instable metastatic colon cancer. Such treatment is now a standard of care for these patients. However, when used as monotherapy checkpoint inhibitors targeting PD-1 and PD-L1 are not effective in metastatic colorectal cancer patients with microsatellite stable tumors. Recent advances in biology provide a rationale for this intrinsic resistance and support the evaluation of combination therapy to reverse resistance. This article will highlight recent findings on the mechanism of intrinsic resistance and recent advances in clinical trials for combination therapy.

3584 Background: Patients (pts) with microsatellite stable (MSS) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) that progressed on ≥2 prior therapies have limited treatment options, with median OS ranging from 6-9 months (mo). In the dose-escalation phase of this first-in-human multicohort study (NCT02720068), the anti-lymphocyte activation gene (LAG)-3 antibody favezelimab (fave) was well tolerated alone and with pembrolizumab (pembro) across all dose levels (Lakhani, SITC, 2018, abstract O26). Here, we evaluate the safety and efficacy of fave alone or in combination with pembro in pts with advanced MSS CRC from the dose confirmation phase. Methods: Eligible pts with MSS PD-1/PD-L1-treatment-naïve mCRC that progressed on prior standard-of-care (3L+) were enrolled (cohort A) to receive the RP2D of 800 mg fave alone (Arm 1), 800 mg fave + 200 mg pembro (Arm 2C), or 800 mg fave + 200 mg pembro (MK-4280A) co-formulation (Arm 5), all Q3W. Treatment continued for 35 cycles or until progression, unacceptable toxicity, or investigator/pt decision. Pts with confirmed progression per irRECIST v1.1 on fave alone could crossover to 800 mg fave + pembro. Safety was assessed in all treated pts; efficacy in the full analysis set (FAS) of all treated pts with baseline scan. Objectives included safety (primary), ORR (RECIST v1.1 by investigator [secondary]), and DOR, PFS, and OS (exploratory). Interim analysis data cut-off was: Oct. 23, 2020. Results: A total of 20 pts received fave (Arm 1); 89 pts (including 9 crossover) received fave + pembro (Arms 2C+5); 12 pts (Arm 1) and 36 pts (Arms 2C+5), had PD-L1 CPS ≥1 tumors. At data cut-off, median follow-up was 5.8 months (mo) in Arm 1 and 6.2 mo in Arms 2C+5. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were 65% with fave (Arm 1) and 65.2% with fave + pembro (Arms 2C+5). Grade ≥3 TRAEs were 15% (Arm 1), and 20% [Arms 2C+5]). No grade 5 TRAEs were reported. Common TRAEs (≥15%) included fatigue (20.0%), nausea (15%) with fave, and fatigue (16.9%) with fave + pembro. Confirmed ORR was 6.3% (4PR, 1CR) with fave + pembro (Arms 2C+5). No pt receiving fave alone responded. In Arms 2C+5, median DOR was 10.6 mo (range, 5.6-12.7). ORR, OS and PFS by PD-L1 status are reported in the Table. Conclusions: Favezelimab alone or in combination with pembrolizumab had a manageable safety profile, with no treatment-related deaths. Promising antitumor activity was observed with combination therapy, including with MK-4280A, compared with monotherapy most notably in pts with PD-L1 CPS ≥1 tumors. Clinical trial information: NCT02720068. [Table: see text]

e15560 Background: PD-1 blockade is particularly ineffective in patients with microsatellite stable (MSS) or mismatch repair (MMR)-proficient colorectal cancer (CRC). Regorafenib (R) has been shown to modulate anti-tumor immunity through different mechanisms, including the reduction of tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) and lymphocyte activation or immunosuppressive cells, such as forkhead box P3 (Foxp3)+ CD25+ regulatory T cells (Tregs). Synergy between R and anti–PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies has been demonstrated in pre-clinical models compared to that of either treatment alone. Accordingly, this study attempted to evaluate the combined activity of regorafenib with an immune checkpoint inhibitor. Methods: This trial was a prospective, open-label, monocentric, nonrandomized, single arm study. This study included patients with non MSI-H mCRC who received R (80 mg QD 3weeks/4) and sintilimab (S)(200 mg every 3 weeks).The primary endpoint was the confirmed objective response rate (ORR).The secondary endpoints were progression free survival (PFS),overall survival (OS),disease control rate (DCR) and safety. Results: As of January 8, 2021, 24 patients (median age 59 years) with mCRC were enrolled and received treatment with R+S. RAS wild type was 50% of all patients. In addition, 83.3% of patients received two prior lines of treatment, while 58.3% had liver metastases at enrollment. Of the 24 patients, the best response was observed to be stable disease(SD) in six patients (25%) and progressive disease (PD)in four patients (16.7%). Another nine (37.5%) patients have yet to be evaluated. In the 15 evaluated patients, the ORR(RECIST version 1.1) was 33.3% , the DCR was 73.3%. Additionally, among the 10 evaluated patients with liver metastases, the ORR was 30% , the DCR was 80%. Among the nine evaluated patients with wild-type populations of k-ras, the ORR and DCR was found to be 44.4% and 66.7%, which was higher than the mutation patients. The median PFS was 4.2 (95% CI, 2.5, NA) months, the median OS was not reached. The most common grade 3/4 adverse events were palmar-plantar erythro-dysesthesia syndrome (4.2%), erythra (4.2%). No death was related to the treatment. Moreover, four (16.7%) patients were subject to at least 1 dose modification or treatment interruption. Conclusions: In this study, the combination of R+S achieved a similar ORR with REGONIVO. Furthermore, this combination was well tolerated and had a manageable safety profile. However, due to the limited sample size, some biases may be present. As a result, we will continue to expand the sample size for future verification. Clinical trial information: NCT04745130.

5581 Background: Traditional platinum-based systemic chemotherapy continue to be the SOC for aEC in the first line. Phase 2 clinical trials of chemotherapy (GOG 129 series) and some targeted therapies (229 series) for second line advanced endometrial cancer (aEC) have proved disappointing. Recently the treatment landscape for aEC patients has significantly changed with newer targeted therapies focusing on the microsatellite instability (MSI) status of endometrial tumors. The objective of the ECHO study was to describe real-world treatment patterns and outcomes in non-MSI-high or DNA mismatch repair proficient (pMMR) aEC patients in clinical practice in the United States (US) prior to 2019. Methods: The ECHO study is a multicenter, retrospective chart review study in women diagnosed with aEC in the US. Data were obtained from medical records of adult women (≥18 years) diagnosed with advanced or inoperable aEC (stages III or IV) with known MSI status, who had received at least one prior systemic therapy and progressed between July 1, 2016 – June 30, 2019. De-identified patient data extracted by treating oncologists included patient demographics, clinical and treatment characteristics, and clinical outcomes. Kaplan-Meier analyses were performed to estimate real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS) and overall survival (OS). Results: A total of 124 non-MSI-high or pMMR aEC patients who had progression following first line therapy were included in this interim analysis. Average age was 63 years, 62.9% White/Caucasian, 16.9% Hispanic/Latino, and 86% had ECOG ≤1. Metastases were observed in 70% of patients at diagnosis, with the most common metastatic sites being lung (47.6%), liver (32.3%), and distant lymph nodes (29%). As 2nd line therapy, 69% of patients received mono or combination chemotherapy (primarily with doxorubicin), 13% hormonal therapy, and 18% targeted therapy ± chemotherapy. Median duration of 2nd line therapy was 4 months. The majority (86.3%) discontinued 2nd line therapy, with disease progression the most common reason (66.4%). A quarter (26.6%) of patients initiated an additional line of therapy. Median rwPFS from initiation of 2nd line therapy was 5 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 4-9). Median OS from initiation of 2nd line therapy was 12 months (95%CI: 9-18). Estimated OS rates from initiation of 2nd line therapy at 6, 12, and 24 months were 66%, 47%, and 30%, respectively. Conclusions: In this retrospective, chart review study, patients with non-MSI-high/pMMR aEC in the US who failed at least one systemic therapy had poor prognosis on subsequent therapies. There continues to be a significant unmet need in this group of women. Novel therapies are needed that delay progression and/or improve overall survival and further research is indicated to explore this.

5062 Background: Loss-of-function genomic alterations (GAs) in MSH6 have been associated with a unique subtype of hypermutated mCRPC that is often microsatellite stable (MSS) and may occur in either a sporadic or familial Lynch Syndrome-like clinical setting. Methods: 5,617 mCRPC cases were sequenced to evaluate all classes of GA using a hybrid capture-based FDA-approved comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) assay. Tumor mutational burden (TMB) was determined on 0.8 Mb of sequenced DNA and microsatellite instability high (MSI-High) was determined on 95 loci. MSI-low status was not assessed. Results: 78 (1.4%) mCRPC were MSH6mut (Table). MSH6mut mCRPC included 73.1% short variant mutations, 23.1% biallelic deletions, 2.6% genomic rearrangements, and 1.3% multiple GAs/sample. Co-mutation of MSH2 was found in 28% of MSH6mut cases vs. 2% in MSH6wt cases (P mut mCRPC, which was significantly greater than the 2% seen in MSH6wt cases (P mut cases, compared to 3% MSH6wt cases (P mut cases with neither MSI-High nor MMR mutational signature, 87% did not have biallelic loss of MSH6 or any other MMR gene, confirming that monoallelic pathogenic mutations are insufficient to cause the MMR-D phenotype. For subjects whose variants could be classified, 45% (19/42) of pathogenic MSH6 alleles were germline; of these, 58% (11/19) had neither MSI-High nor an MMR single nucleotide signature. MSH6mut cases had fewer TMPRSS2: ERG fusions (P =.01), but harbored significantly higher frequencies of GAs in AR (P =.0002), ATM (P =.04), PIK3CA (P =.0003), APC (P =.005), ERBB2 (P =.001), and CDK6 (p =.046), likely at least partially attributable to the higher TMB in MSH6mutcases (P mut mCRPC is a unique disease that often features a hypermutated genomic signature, although only 46% of cases exhibited MSI-high status. This complex phenotype highlights the potential utility of multiple rather than single biomarkers to understand tumor biology and determine patients who may benefit from immunotherapy.[Table: see text]

e15585 Background: A previous phase 1b trial has shown encouraging efficacy of regorafenib plus nivolumab in patients with microsatellite stable/mismatch repair proficient (MSS/pMMR) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of this regimen in Chinese patients in the real world. Methods: We retrospectively identified patients with MSS/pMMR mCRC who received at least one dose of programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) inhibitors plus regorafenib from 5/2019 to 2/2021 in 10 Chinese medical centers. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR) and the safety. Results: Fifty-two patients were identified. Liver metastases were presented in 35 patients (67%). A total of 48 patients (92%) received regorafenib plus a PD-1 inhibitor as the third or later line treatment. At the data cut-off, 11 patients (21%) were still on treatment. Other patients terminated treatment because of progressive disease (45%), treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) (14%) or treatment-unrelated deaths (6%). The median treatment cycle was 3 (range, 1-18). At a median follow-up of 4.9 months, the median OS was 17.3 months (95% CI, 10.2-NR) and the median PFS was 3.1 months (95%CI, 2.5-6.0). Baseline liver metastases were associated with inferior PFS (2.7 versus 6.3 months, p

3573 Background: Microsatellite stable metastatic colorectal cancer (MSS mCRC) represents a high unmet need since there are currently no approved immunotherapy options. Since the inhibition of the transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) pathway is known to contribute to the enhancement of immunotherapy efficacy, here, we report the results of vactosertib, a potent and selective TGF-β receptor I kinase inhibitor, combined with pembrolizumab in patients with MSS mCRC. Methods: In this phase 2, open label trial, patients have received vactosertib (300 mg BID, 5 days on / 2 days off) and pembrolizumab (200 mg, every 3 weeks) until confirmed progressive disease (PD), unacceptable toxicity or consent withdrawal. Patients with histologically confirmed mCRC who had disease progression after treatment with all available therapies including fluoropyrimidine and oxaliplatin or irinotecan were enrolled. Eligible patients were ≥19 years old, had ECOG status ≤1, and had no prior exposure to immunotherapy. The objectives were to evaluate the safety and efficacy (objective response rate (ORR) per RECIST v1.1). Results: Thirty-three patients with MSS mCRC were enrolled. Median age was 60 (range 33-72), 55% were male, median number of previous lines of chemotherapy was 3 (range 1-7), and 82% were consensus molecular subtype (CMS) 4. The ORR was 15.2% including 5 partial responses (PRs), 7 stable diseases, and 17 PDs as best overall responses; 12 patients remain on treatment. Among 5 patients with PR, 3 patients had confirmed PR and median duration of response was not reached yet. As of 04 Jan 2021, the most common treatment related adverse events (AEs) were increased amylase (21.2%), pruritus (21.2%), rash (21.2%), and increased lipase (18.2%). There were 3 treatment-related SAEs reported; drug induced pneumonitis (3%), nausea (3%), and vomiting (3%). Conclusions: The combination treatment with vactosertib and pembrolizumab showed favorable safety profile with promising efficacy in patients with MSS mCRC. Updated data including pharmacodynamic markers will be presented at the meeting. Clinical trial information: NCT03724851.

3561 Background: BRAF V600E+, MSS mCRC patients comprise up to 10% of advanced CRC. They have a poor prognosis with median survivals typically

3559 Background: The MORPHEUS platform consists of multiple, global, open-label, randomized Phase Ib/II trials designed to identify early efficacy and safety signals of treatment (tx) combinations across cancers. Here, atezo (anti-PD-L1) was tested with Imprime and bev (anti-VEGF) for MSS mCRC, a poorly immunogenic cancer generally resistant to checkpoint inhibitors. Imprime acts as a pathogen-associated molecular pattern that, when bound to anti-β glucan antibodies (ABA), activates the innate immune system with the potential to 1) promote priming and expansion of tumor-specific T cells, 2) promote M2-M1 macrophage polarization and 3) enhance the immunomodulatory effects of atezo and bev. Therefore, we hypothesized that atezo + Imprime + bev would induce an antitumor response beyond that of rego, a standard-of-care multikinase inhibitor, in patients (pts) with MSS mCRC. Methods: Pts with MSS mCRC unselected for the Imprime-specific biomarker (ABA) and refractory to 1-2 prior lines of standard therapy received atezo (1200 mg IV every 3 weeks [q3w]) + Imprime (4 mg/kg IV on Days 1, 8, 15) + bev (7.5 mg/kg IV q3w) or control tx with rego (160 mg orally days 1-21; dose escalation to 160 mg during Cycle 1 allowed per institutional guidelines). The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR; investigator-assessed RECIST 1.1); secondary endpoints included disease control rate (DCR; response or stable disease ≥ 12 weeks), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and safety. Results: Pts were followed-up for ≥18 wk. 15 pts received atezo + Imprime + bev and 13 received rego. Grade (Gr) 3/4 tx-related adverse events (TRAEs) were seen in 13% of atezo + Imprime + bev and 62% of rego pts. No Gr 5 AEs occurred in atezo + Imprime + bev pts and 1 (8%) was reported in a rego pt. One pt in each arm (7% vs 8%, respectively) withdrew from tx due to a TRAE. No radiological responses were seen in either arm. Five pts (33%) receiving atezo + Imprime + bev and 8 (62%) receiving rego had stable disease as best response. DCR was 13% with atezo + Imprime + bev and 23% with rego. Median PFS was 1.5 mo (95% CI: 1.4, 2.8) and 2.8 mo (95% CI: 1.6, 3.1), and median OS was 5.7 mo (95% CI: 4.4, 10.5) and 10.2 mo (95% CI: 4.8, NE) with atezo + Imprime + bev and rego, respectively. There was no apparent correlation between baseline PD-L1 expression or CD8+ lymphocyte tumor infiltration and clinical benefit. Further, the systemic exposure of atezo, Imprime and bev and immunogenicity of atezo and bev are in line with previous clinical experience. Additional biomarker, pharmacokinetics and anti-drug antibody data will be shown. Conclusions: Atezo + Imprime + bev was well tolerated; toxicities were consistent with the safety profiles of the individual agents. No efficacy signal was identified with atezo + Imprime + bev in pts with MSS refractory mCRC. Clinical trial information: NCT03555149.

TPS5611 Background: Folate receptor-alpha (FRα) is expressed on endometrial cancer (EC) cells and is associated with poor prognosis. Mirvetuximab soravtansine (ImmunoGen), an antibody drug conjugate (ADC) comprising a FRα-binding antibody, cleavable linker, and the tubulin-disrupting maytansinoid DM4, showed tolerability and single agent activity in a Phase 1 study with dose expansion in FRα+ advanced/recurrent EC (NCT01609556) and also when combined with chemotherapy, bevacizumab as well as pembrolizumab (NCT02606305). In addition to having direct target-mediated cytotoxicity, ADCs also stimulate the local tumor immune microenvironment. Mirvetuximab soravtansine has been shown to activate monocytes and promote phagocytosis of mirvetuximab-treated FRα-positive tumor cells through a mechanism of Fc-FcγR interaction. Further, the combination of ADCs with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) can overcome primary resistance to immunotherapy in murine models. Given the low response of MSS endometrial cancers to PD-1 blockade, we hypothesized that addition of mirvetuximab may enhance response of these tumors to immunotherapy. Methods: This is a Phase 2, single cohort study of mirvetuximab soravtansine with pembrolizumab in recurrent or persistent EC. Patients must have advanced or recurrent MSS serous endometrial cancer with at least 1 and up to 3 prior lines of therapy. Confirmation of FRα expression (with PS2+ staining intensity in ≥ 50% of cells, performed centrally at Ventana Medical Systems, Inc) is required. Prior receipt of ICI is excluded. Patients will receive the combination of mirvetuximab soravtansine 6 mg/kg AIBW IV and pembrolizumab 200 mg IV administered every 21 days. The co-primary endpoint is progression-free survival at 6 months (PFS6) and objective response rate (ORR) by RECIST 1.1. Translational objectives include assessment of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), expression of immune checkpoint markers, and whole exome sequencing (WES) for DNA repair pathway mutations, neoantigens, and polymorphisms in immunologically relevant genes. Statistical considerations are for a Simon two-stage optimal design with 16 patients in Stage 1 and 19 patients in Stage 2, to a total of 35. Prespecified activity for the first stage of accrual was met, and second stage accrual began November 2020. Clinical trial information: NCT03835819.

3560 Background: The role of immunotherapy in the treatment of pMMR/MSS metastatic CRC is not established. A Japanese phase 1b trial in this setting showed the combination of regorafenib (multikinase inhibitor with immunomodulatory activity) plus nivolumab (anti PD-1) had encouraging activity and manageable safety (Fukuoka, 2020). This study further assessed the safety and efficacy of this combination. Methods: Patients (pts) from the US aged ≥18 years who progressed on/were intolerant to standard chemotherapy were enrolled. Regorafenib was given orally, once daily in 28-day (D) cycles (21D on/7D off) plus IV nivolumab 480 mg on D1. Regorafenib starting dose was 80 mg; if well tolerated, it could be escalated to 120 mg in Cycle 2. Primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR; RECIST 1.1); secondary aims included disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and safety (NCI-CTCAE v5.0 grade). Biomarker analysis was exploratory. Results: 70 pts (59% male) started treatment. At baseline, median age was 57 years (range 34–85), ECOG PS 0/1 was 51%/49%, 67% had liver metastases (mets), and the primary tumor site was right-sided colon in 36% and rectum in 17%. Median number of cycles was 3.0 (range 1–13); 41% of pts escalated regorafenib to 120 mg. Five pts (7.1%) had a partial response (PR) lasting ≥16 weeks (wks) and 22 (31.4%) had stable disease (SD); pts without liver mets had a higher ORR (21.7%). In pts with tumor samples (n = 40), higher baseline expression (IHC) of cytotoxic T cells (CD3+/CD8+/GranzymeB+), Tregs (FoxP3+), and macrophages (CD68+) trended with clinical benefit (PR/SD ≥16 wks/PFS); pts with liver mets had lower expression. Lower plasma levels of biomarkers of vascular biology (e.g. VEGF-D, Ang-2, VWF) trended with longer PFS. Grade (Gr) 3 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) occurred in 53% of pts and Gr 4 in 10%. Three pts had a Gr 5 TEAE: n = 1 related to the combination (sepsis); n = 1 related to nivolumab only by investigator (sepsis); n = 1 unrelated to treatment (respiratory failure). Most common Gr 3/4 TEAEs: maculopapular rash (14%), fatigue (7%), pneumonia (6%), increased bilirubin (6%). Conclusions: Combination treatment with regorafenib (up to 120 mg/day) and nivolumab (480 mg every 28D) has manageable safety. Efficacy of this combination in the North American population did not emulate results in the Japanese population. Absence of liver mets and expression of specific biomarkers indicate a better response and may warrant further analysis. Clinical trial information: NCT04126733. [Table: see text]

124 Background: Microsatellite stable (MSS) colorectal cancer and CRCLM are highly resistant to current immunotherapeutic approaches. Understanding the TME and the impact of standard chemotherapeutics is of utmost importance in developing optimal therapeutic strategies. Data is limited on the impact of NACT in the TME. In this study, we sought to explore the effects of chemotherapy on the proportions of different immune cell populations [Total leukohematopoetic cells, CD45+, T cell markers, CD3+, CD8+, and macrophage (M) markers, CD163+, CD68+)], as well as to assess their prognostic capacity. Methods: CRCLM pts who underwent liver resection were divided in 2 groups: pts who had NACT within 4 months of liver resection [NACT (+)] and no NACT [NACT (-)]. Whole slide staining of metastatectomy specimen for CD3, CD8, CD68, CD163, and CD45 was done. Cellular density within representative tumor core sections was analyzed. Retrospective chart review was done to obtain clinical data. Disease free (DFS), relapse free (RFS), and overall survival (OS) were analyzed using Kaplan Meir methods. Association between markers and outcomes was evaluated using Cox Regression Models. Results: A total of 43 pts were studied [NACT (+), n= 14; NACT (-), n=29). There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics between the two groups, including age, primary site, T stage, N stage, and grade. Median OS was 48 months. Outcomes were not significantly different with use of NACT. Within the NACT (+) CRCLM significant increases were seen in densities of CD3, CD8, CD45 and CD163 cells. Densities of CD8 cells were strongly correlated to CD163 cell densities ([r] 0.77, p < .0001). The NACT (+) cohort saw significantly increased ratios of T-cells/macrophages as compared to NACT (-) (CD3/CD68, CD3/CD163, CD8/CD163). High CD45 density was associated with improved OS (HR = 0.28, p = 0.006). CD3, CD8, CD68, and CD163 were not independently associated with OS. However, both the ratio of CD3/CD68 and CD3/163 were associated with improved OS (HR 0.44, p=0.03 and HR 0.27, p=0.03 respectively). Conversely, CD68/45 and CD163/CD45 ratios were associated with a worse OS (HR 1.42, p=0.05 and HR 1.43, p=0.03 respectively). No difference was seen in cellular populations based on the type of NACT received: oxaliplatin vs irinotecan. Conclusions: Our study highlights that the administration of NACT is associated with favorable changes in LM TME. While there is a general increase in leukocytes (CD45), the density of CD3+ and CD8+ T cells is particularly increased. Further, this increase is proportionately greater than the concurrent increases on monocytoid populations, reflected by increased CD3/CD163 and CD8/CD163 ratios. Ratios of T-cells/ macrophages are predictive of survival. This study was partly supported by the American Cancer Society Grant, 126771-IRG-14-194-11-IRG.

72 Background: Microsatellite stable (MSS) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) has been associated with immunotherapy resistance. However, the impact of metastatic diseases sites on clinical outcome with checkpoint inhibition has not be adequately investigated. Methods: Following IRB approval (14361), we performed a retrospective study to assess the response and progression-free survival (PFS) to PD-1 or PD-L1 based therapy in patients with MSS mCRC who progressed following standard chemotherapy and targeted therapy. Patients were included if they received an FDA approved anti-PD1 or anti-PD-L1 agent, alone or in combination with other investigational agents. Exclusion criteria included concurrent cytotoxic therapy. Response and PFS were determined by RECIST guidelines. Results: 97 patients with refractory MSS mCRC satisfied the inclusion criteria were evaluable for analysis. 57, 17, 13, and 10 received nivolumab, atezolizumab, pembrolizumab, and durvalumab, respectively. 47, 8, 10, 10, 17 received concurrent VEGFR, MEK, CTLA-4, radiation, or other targeted therapies. Among tested variables, including age, gender, primary tumor location, ECOG status, RAS, BRAF, APC, TP53, TMB, and sites of metastasis, only ECOG status (0 vs. 1) and metastatic disease to the liver were associated with disease control (partial response and stable disease; p = 0.005 and < 0.001 respectively). Disease control rates in patients without liver metastases (n = 43) was 56% (95% CI: 40-71%), compared with 2% (95% CI: 0.1-10%) in patients with liver metastases (n = 54) (p < 0.001). Also, liver involvement was predictive for PFS based on multivariate Cox regression model (p < 0.001). The median PFS in patients with liver involvement was 1.5 vs 4.5 months for no liver involvement (HR = 4.41, p = < 0.001). Amongst patients without liver metastases, 35% (15/43) remained without progression at 6 months. These patients were characterized by lung metastases (n = 8) and/or lymph node metastases (n = 4). Conclusions: The presence of liver metastases is MSS mCRC is predictive for lack of benefit from PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors. Patients without liver metastases can derive a meaningful clinical benefit, with 35% being progression-free at 6 months. Future PD-1/PD-L1 drug development should consider metastatic sites of disease in study design and development.