Search

Hormone receptor-positive breast cancer is commonly treated with endocrine therapy (ET); however, over time, cancer cells can develop endocrine resistance. This review aims to document combination therapy and sequential therapy in the use of endocrine agents and targeted agents, by conducting two systematic searches using four databases: Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE and Web of Science. A total of 26 studies that covered combination therapy were obtained and included for the review. Fourteen were phase III documenting combinations of mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR), phosphoinositide-3-kinase (PI3K), vascular endothelial growth factor receptor, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 and cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors. The remaining studies were of phase II nature that reported combinations involving inhibitors in mTOR, endothelial growth factor receptor, CDK4/6 and TKI. Interesting findings in inhibitor combinations involving CDK4/6, mTOR and PI3K suggest clinical activity that can overcome endocrine resistance. On the other hand, there were 0 studies that covered sequential therapy. Overall findings showed that combination therapy improved treatment efficacy over monotherapy in postmenopausal patients with hormone receptor-positive advanced breast cancer. Inevitably, the benefits are accompanied with increased toxicity. To optimise ET, further research into combinations and effective patient selection will need to be defined. Additionally, this review warrants future studies to explore sequential therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Retrospective data suggest better outcomes for patients with double hormonal receptor (oestrogen [ER] and progesterone receptor [PgR])–positive (dHR+) early breast cancer, compared with single hormonal receptor–positive, sHR+, (ER+/PgR– or ER–/PgR+) disease. Here, we evaluate the classification according to intrinsic subtypes and clinical outcomes of sHR+ versus dHR+ in HER2-negative breast cancer patients enrolled in GEICAM/9906 study ( NCT00129922 ). Methods Archival tumours were retrieved retrospectively for the analysis of ER, PgR and HER2 status and classified into intrinsic subtypes using the PAM50 gene expression assay. Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were explored using a Cox proportional hazard analysis. Results Data on intrinsic subtypes were available in 571 (50%) patients with ER+ and/or PR+, and HER2-negative primary tumours. The incidence of luminal A and luminal B subtypes were 52%/36% in dHR+ tumours (ER+/PgR+), and 15%/58% in ER+/PgR–tumours. ER–/PgR+ tumours were mainly luminal A (52%). Compared with ER+/PgR+ patients, DFS was similar in ER–/PgR+ (hazard ratio [HR] 1.15, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.57–2.34, p = 0.70) but worse in ER+/PgR– patients (HR 1.60, 95% CI 1.12–2.28, p < 0.01). Similar results were observed for OS (HR 1.50, p = 0.30 and HR 1.86, p < 0.01, respectively). Conclusions The ER+/PgR– group is characterised by higher proliferation and worse outcomes. In spite of the ER–/PgR+ subgroup resembles ER+/PgR+ disease in terms of molecular subtypes and outcomes, the small number of patients in this subgroup prevents from drawing any conclusions. Trial registration EudraCT: 2005-003108-12 (retrospectively registered 28/06/2005). Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier NCT00129922 (retrospectively registered 10/08/2005). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Since the widespread implementation of adding palbociclib to endocrine therapy in clinical practice, myelosuppression is becoming increasingly recognized as a toxicity that may lead to dose modification. We aimed to characterize toxicities observed with palbociclib resulting in dose modifications and prescriber preferences in modifying palbociclib dosage in response to treatment-related toxicities outside the context of a clinical trial.Methods: We conducted a single institution, retrospective study of treatment-related adverse events (AEs) resulting in modifications in dose and schedule and the methods by which dose modifications occurred in patients with advanced hormone receptor (HR)-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative breast cancer receiving palbociclib and endocrine therapy.Results: From 2/2015 to 10/2016, 100 patients were identified for inclusion in this study. Treatment with palbociclib and endocrine therapy resulted in dose modifications in 38.0% of patients due to AEs with 18.4% requiring subsequent dose changes. Most palbociclib dose modifications occurred during the first 2 cycles. Grade 3-4 neutropenia accounted for 54.8% events of palbociclib dose modification. Most providers (65.8%) dose reduced palbociclib from 125 mg to 100 mg as their preferred method of dose modification, while others dose reduced from 125 mg to 75 mg (10.5%) and altered the schedule to 125 mg every other day (7.9%). A comparable rate of palbociclib dose modifications and subsequent dose changes were identified in an age ≥ 65 subgroup. In this group, dose adjustments were most commonly from grade 3-4 neutropenia, occurred mainly during cycle 1, and were most frequently addressed by dose reduction from 125 to 100 mg.Conclusions: Neutropenia remains the predominant cause for palbociclib dose modification and most modifications occur within the first two cycles. Older age (≥ 65) does not affect palbociclib tolerance. Our findings provide context outside of a clinical trial that inform ongoing studies evaluating the safety and feasibility of palbociclib-based therapies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: CDK4/6 inhibitors in the first and second treatment line in patients with HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer (mBC) in combination with hormonal therapy improve progression-free survival. Role of CDK4/6 inhibitors in further treatment lines remains unclear.Methods: Retrospective analysis of 24 HR+/HER2- heavily pretreated mBC patients is presented.Results: A total of 58.3% patients achieved stable disease. No objective response was observed. Median progression-free survival was 4.8 months; median overall survival was 11 months. Treatment was well tolerated.Conclusion: Favorable toxicity profile and efficacy of palbociclib/aromatase inhibitors combination in heavily pretreated luminal mBC patients in this study emphasize the need for further investigation of such drugs in this population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: This study investigates weight trajectories in pre- versus postmenopausal breast cancer (BC) survivors diagnosed with hormone receptor-positive tumors, with a specific focus on discerning menopausal status and type of endocrine treatment (ET) as risk factors for weight gain during ET.Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of electronic medical records. Descriptive statistics and Chi-squared and t tests were used to compare pre- and postmenopausal women. Chi-squared tests and ANOVA were used for within-group associations between patient characteristics and weight trajectories. Log-binomial regression models were used to estimate relative risk for weight gain.Results: The final sample was 32% premenopausal (n = 140) and 68% postmenopausal (n = 298). Relative risk (RR) for weight gain during ET was highest in women who were premenopausal (RR = 1.29, 1.03–1.52) and had Stage 3 BC (RR = 2.12, 1.59–2.82), mastectomy (RR = 1.49, 1.19–1.88), axillary node dissection (RR = 1.39, 1.11–1.73), and chemotherapy (RR = 1.80, 1.37–2.36). For each kg of weight gained between BC diagnosis and start of ET, and for each additional year of age, RR of gaining weight during ET decreased (RR = 0.98, 0.97–0.99, and RR = 0.99, 0.98–0.99, respectively). Menopausal status and type of ET were not significant predictors of weight gain. In multivariable analysis, only weight loss between BC diagnosis and start of ET was significant.Conclusion: The association of weight loss prior to ET and subsequent substantial weight gain during ET warrants further investigation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Breast cancer remains the most common cancer in women in the United States, the second most common cause of cancer death, and the main cause of death in women ages 45 to 55 years. Molecular analyses have shown that breast cancer is divided into several subtypes (luminal A, luminal B, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 [HER2] enriched, and basal-like), based on microarray techniques. Patients diagnosed as having breast cancer may undergo adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy, depending on the tumor size, hormone receptor, HER2/neu status, and desire for breast preservation. Patients with positive estrogen and/or progesterone receptor status benefit from treatment with selective estrogen receptor modulators such as tamoxifen or aromatase inhibitors, based on menopausal status and risk of recurrence. HER2-targeted agents such as trastuzumab and pertuzumab are used in combination with chemotherapy in patients with HER2/neu breast cancer. Triple-negative breast cancer is a unique subtype that lacks specific targets, and its treatment primarily includes chemotherapy. This article reviews the current clinical approaches to the management of patients diagnosed as having breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant and/or adjuvant chemotherapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Palbociclib (Ibrance®) is the first-in-class CDK4/6 inhibitor which has been introduced into clinical practice for the treatment of estrogen receptor (ER)-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC). It is an orally administered drug, which acts by selectively inhibiting cyclin-dependant kinases CDK4 and CDK6. Given together with anti-estrogens like letrozole and fulvestrant it enhances the antiproliferative effect of these drugs without compromising the favorable toxicity profile of endocrine therapy. Areas covered: This review gives a concise overview of the current available preclinical and clinical data about pabociclib including its chemistry, mechanism of action, pharmacokinetics and evidence of its substantial anti-tumor efficacy and safety profile when combined with endocrine therapy Expert commentary: Palbociclib doubles treatment efficacy of letrozole and fulvestrant with a restricted and well manageable toxicity profile. Efficacy as well as safety results from the three registration trials are remarkably consistent. Patients’ quality of life is maintained on palbociclib treatment. The treatment landscape in ER+ HER2− MBC will be highly influenced by this compound and development of two other CDK4/6 inhibitors. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

BACKGROUND Invasive disease-free survival (IDFS) rates are excellent in patients with breast cancer (BC) with hormone receptor-positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-), axillary lymph node-negative (LN-) tumors with a 21-gene expression assay recurrence score (RS) of 0 to 10. However, to the authors' knowledge, the outcomes among patients with an RS of 11 to 25 who are treated with endocrine therapy alone are unknown. METHODS In this retrospective single-institution study, the authors described the characteristics of patients with HR+, HER2-, LN- BC who underwent a 21-gene expression assay. In addition, among those individuals diagnosed between 2005 and 2011, we measured IDFS, recurrence-free survival, distant recurrence-free survival, and overall survival rates, focusing on patients with an RS of 11 to 25 by receipt of chemotherapy. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate survival rates and multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were used to calculate hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs). RESULTS Among 1424 patients, the RS distribution was 0 to 10 in 297 patients (21%), 11 to 25 in 894 patients (63%), and >25 in 233 patients (16%); of these, 1.7%, 15%, and 73.4% of patients, respectively, received chemotherapy. With a median follow-up of 58 months, those patients with an RS of 11 to 25 had an IDFS rate at 5 years of 92.6% (95% CI, 89.6%-94.7%), which was comparable between those who received chemotherapy and those who did not. The hazard ratios of the effect of chemotherapy were 1.64 for IDFS (95% CI, 0.73-3.71), 1.46 for recurrence-free survival (95% CI, 0.41-5.23), 1.25 for distant recurrence-free survival (95% CI, 0.32-4.92), and 2.19 for overall survival (95% CI, 0.44-11.0). CONCLUSIONS The results of the current study demonstrate similar outcomes with or without chemotherapy in patients with HR+, HER2-, LN- BC who have an RS of 11 to 25, but a benefit from chemotherapy in this group cannot be ruled out. Cancer 2017;123:2422-31. © 2017 American Cancer Society. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Hormone receptor-positive (HR+) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive (HER2+) breast cancer is a distinct subtype with different prognosis and response to treatment. HER2-targeted therapy is currently recommended for patients with HR+/HER2+ advanced breast cancer. However, there is debate over which drugs to add on the basis of HER2 blockade yield the optimal efficacy. This systematic review and network meta-analysis was conducted to solve the problem., Methods: Eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing different interventions in HR+/HER2+ metastatic breast cancer were included. The outcomes of interest included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs). Pooled hazard ratios or odds ratios with credible intervals (CrIs) were calculated to estimate the predefined outcomes. The optimal therapeutics were identified by comparing the surface under the cumulative ranking curves (SUCRA)., Results: Totally, 23 literatures of 20 RCTs were included. Regarding PFS, significant differences were detected between single or dual HER2 blockade plus endocrine therapy (ET) versus ET alone and dual HER2 blockade plus ET versus physician's choice. Trastuzumab, pertuzumab plus chemotherapy significantly improved PFS than trastuzumab plus chemotherapy (hazard ratio 0.69, 95% CrI 0.50-0.92). The SUCRA values suggested the relatively better efficacy of dual HER2-targeted therapy plus ET (86%-91%) than chemotherapy (62%-81%) in prolonging PFS and OS. The HER2 blockade-containing regimens showed similar safety profiles in eight documented TRAEs., Conclusions: Prominent status of dual-targeted therapy for patients with HR+/HER2+ metastatic breast cancer was revealed. Compared with chemotherapy-containing regimens, the ET-containing ones showed better efficacy and similar safety profiles, which could be recommended in clinical practice., (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Background: More than half of Chinese patients with hormone receptor positive (HR+) ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) are treated with mastectomy, and usually subjected to postoperative endocrine therapy (ET). Given that long-term ET can cause severe adverse effects it is important to determine the beneficial effect and safety of post-mastectomy ET on the disease-free survival (DFS) and adverse events in patients with HR+ DCIS., Methods: To explore beneficial effect and safety of post-mastectomy ET in patients with HR+ DCIS, we performed a multicenter, population-based study. This retrospective study analyzed the DFS and adverse events in 1037 HR+ DCIS Chinese patients with or without post-mastectomy ET from eight breast centers between 2006 and 2016. The median follow-up time period was 86 months., Results: There were 791 DCIS patients receiving ET (ET group). Those patients were followed up for a median of 86 months (range, 60-177 months). There were 23 cases with tumor recurrence or distant metastasis. There were similar 5-year DFS rates and DFS between the ET and non-ET groups, even for those with high-risk factors. Conversely, 37.04% of patients suffered from adverse events after ET, which were significantly higher than those in the non-ET group., Conclusions: ET after mastectomy did not benefit patients with HR+ DCIS for their DFS, rather increased adverse events in those patients. Therefore, ET after mastectomy may not be recommended for patients with HR+ DCIS, even for those with high-risk factors, such as multifocal, microinvasive, and higher T stage., Funding: This study was supported by grants from Outstanding Scientific Fund of Shengjing Hospital (201803) and Outstanding Young Scholars of Liaoning Province (2019-YQ-10)., Competing Interests: NN, YZ, YB, XW, SY, DS, HX, TL, BH, YZ, JL, XQ, JL, XZ, HC No competing interests declared, CL Senior editor, eLife, (© 2023, Niu, Zhang, Bai et al.)

Fulvestrant is a dose dependent selective estrogen receptor (ER) down-regulator (SERD) used in ER-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Nearly all patients develop resistance. We performed molecular analysis of circulating tumor cells (CTC) to gain insight into fulvestrant resistance. Preclinical studies were performed with cultured breast cancer cells spiked into human blood and analyzed on the CellSearch ® system. Clinical data are limited to a subset of patients with ER-positive MBC from a previously reported pilot trial whose disease was progressing on fulvestrant (N = 7) or aromatase inhibitors (AIs) (N = 10). CTCs were enumerated and phenotyped for ER and B-cell lymphoma (BCL2) using the CellSearch ® CXC kit. In preclinical modeling, tamoxifen and AIs resulted in stabilized ER expression, whereas fulvestrant eliminated it. Five of seven patients progressing on fulvestrant had ≥5CTC/7.5 ml WB. Two of these five, treated with 500 mg/month fulvestrant, had no detectable CTC-expression of ER and BCL2 (an ER regulated gene). Three patients had heterogeneous CTC-ER and BCL2 expression indicating incomplete degradation of the ER target by fulvestrant. Two of these patients received 250 mg/month whereas the third patient received 500 mg/month fulvestrant. Her cancer harbored a mutation (Y537S) in the estrogen receptor alpha gene ( ESR1 ). All seven ER positive patients progressing on AIs had heterogeneous CTC-ER expression. These results suggest heterogeneous mechanisms of resistance to fulvestrant, including insufficient dosage, ESR1 mutation, or conversion to dependence on non-ER pathways. CTC enumeration, phenotyping, and genotyping might identify patients who would benefit from fulvestrant dose escalation versus switching to alternative therapies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Current international guidelines recommend endocrine therapy as the initial treatment of choice in hormone receptor positive advanced breast cancer. Endocrine therapy has been a mainstay of hormone responsive breast cancer treatment for more than a century. To date it is based on different approaches,such as blocking the estrogen receptor through selective receptor estrogen modulators, depleting extragonadal peripheral estrogen synthesis by aromatase inhibitors or inducing estrogen receptor degradation using selective down-regulators. Despite estrogen and/or progesterone receptor positive status, up to a quarter of patients could be either primarily resistant to hormone therapies or will develop hormone resistance during the course of their disease. Different mechanisms, either intrinsic or acquired, could be implicated in endocrine resistance. In the present work available endocrine therapies and their appropriate sequences have been reviewed, and the most promising strategies to overcome endocrine resistance have been highlighted. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Endocrine therapy is an established and effective treatment strategy for hormone receptor positive metastatic breast cancer. The clinical utility of endocrine therapy is lost over time due to evolving changes in tumor biology and the development of endocrine resistance. Many agents targeting the intracellular signaling pathways associated with endocrine resistance are in development. Encouraging early results have been seen for agents which directly target the estrogen receptor (ER), inhibitors of co-signaling pathways, inhibitors of ER chaperones, ER antagonists able to inhibit mutated or otherwise activated ERs, and modulators of histone acetylation restoring synthesis of ER signaling components. Following our systematic review of treatments with established benefits in this supplement, we review some of the more promising new strategies for overcoming endocrine resistance, looking at the impact on disease control and quality of life for women with hormone receptor positive, HER2 negative breast cancer. We also examine the biomarkers that may guide selection of the best therapy for the individual. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Endocrine therapy for the treatment of hormone receptor positive, HER2 negative, metastatic breast cancer is continually evolving. We systematically reviewed phase 2 and 3 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of agents used in this setting to assess the effectiveness and safety of these agents for postmenopausal women. Across the 32 studies in more than 10 000 patients, the greatest improvement in progression-free survival (PFS) was seen with the addition of a cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK)4/6 inhibitor to standard endocrine therapy. Treatment with a mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor, phosphoinositol-3-kinase (Pi3K) inhibitor, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitor and with a selective estrogen receptor degrader (SERD) also showed benefit in PFS for selected trials. Overall survival (OS) improved with the use of mTOR inhibitors and a SERD; however, studies were not powered for an OS endpoint. Encouraging results from early studies of histone deacetylase (HDAC) and B-cell lymphoma (BCL2) inhibitors are yet to be confirmed in phase III clinical trials. Study discontinuation rates and toxicity-related deaths were highest with VEGF inhibitors in combination with endocrine therapy, limiting their use in hormone receptor positive breast cancer. CDK4/6 inhibitors and mTOR inhibitors appeared to have activity in both first and second line settings, but required additional monitoring for common toxicities. The activity of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors was limited to the first-line setting and treatment discontinuation rates were higher than with mTOR inhibitors and SERDs. Overall, PFS benefit appears to be greatest when agents acting on CDK4/6, mTOR and Pi3K pathways, and SERDs are added to standard endocrine therapy. If these early results persist in further studies, these data are likely to change the way we treat hormone receptor positive, HER2 negative metastatic breast cancer. In the follow-up article to this review, we will consider the potential future treatment options for these patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Breast cancer diagnosed at a young age is associated with a poor prognosis. It is possible that inadequate endocrine therapy for the youngest women contributes to their poorer prognosis. Data on optimal endocrine therapy selection as well as duration for premenopausal women are crucial. Recently published clinical trials including Australian Breast and Colorectal Cancer Study Group-12 (ABCSG-12), E-3193, and Suppression of Ovarian Function Trial (SOFT)/Tamoxifen and Exemestane Trial (TEXT) have shed light on the role of ovarian function suppression and aromatase inhibitors in premenopausal women. Additionally, optimal duration of endocrine therapy has been addressed in the recent Adjuvant Tamoxifen: Longer Against Shorter (ATLAS) and Adjuvant Tamoxifen-To Offer More? (aTTom) trials. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

No study has previously reported the utilization and adherence to hormone therapy for Medicare Part-D beneficiaries with breast cancer. This study was conducted using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare-linked data to assess socio-demographic, geographic, and other variations in the receipt of hormone therapy among patients with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer and to assess adherence to hormone therapy within 1-year follow-up. The percentage of patients who received hormone therapy was calculated and stratified by chemotherapy status (yes or no). Logistic regression models were performed to assess the variations associated with the use of selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs), aromatase inhibitors (AIs), and hormone therapy (SERMs or AIs). Of 25,128 women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer in 2006-2009 who were enrolled in Medicare Part-D program, 70.8 % received hormone therapy, 22.2 % received SERM, and 56.9 % received AIs. Among those receiving chemotherapy, significant predictors of receiving hormone therapy included age, tumor stage, surgery type, radiation therapy; significant predictors of receiving SERM included race, year of diagnosis, and tumor stage; and significant predictors of receiving AI included age, race, socioeconomic status, geographic location, tumor stage, and radiation therapy. For those without receiving chemotherapy, most of the above factors were significant, but differed across each drug class. In conclusion, over two-thirds of hormone receptor-positive breast cancer patients received hormone therapy, and still 29.2 % of patients did not receive it. Tumor and clinical factors are the most significant predictors for the receipt of hormone therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Cyclin-dependent kinases 4/6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors are anti-tumor agents for the treatment of hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. Palbociclib, abemaciclib and dalpiciclib have been approved for the treatment of breast cancer in China. Common adverse effects of CDK4/6 inhibitors include bone marrow suppression, gastrointestinal toxicities, liver dysfunction, and skin or subcutaneous tissue adverse reactions (AEs). The Breast Cancer Expert Group of Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology (CSCO) summarized the incidence, clinical manifestations, and grading of the AEs. This expert consensus reports measures of AE management on the basis of experience of clinical practice and the latest advances worldwide, aiming to guide clinical practice by the way of managing AE and help to choose the best treatment regimen.

Background/aim: Although CDK4/6 inhibitors have been increasingly used in combination with hormonal agents to treat hormone-receptor positive and human epithelial growth factor receptor 2-negative breast cancer, the mechanism of CDK4/6 inhibitor resistance and its impact on established therapy for post-resistance, especially bevacizumab combined with chemotherapy, are unclear., Materials and Methods: Sensitivity of RB knockout MCF7 clones to CDK4/6 inhibitors was evaluated in vitro. One RB knockout clone was subcutaneously implanted in nude mice and the effects of bevacizumab on volume and microvessel density (MVD) of tumors were investigated., Results: Palbociclib did not exhibit antitumor efficacy against the RB knockout tumor, in contrast to the parental MCF7 xenograft model. Bevacizumab significantly exhibited antitumor efficacy and suppressed the MVD both in RB knockout and parental MCF7 xenograft models., Conclusion: Bevacizumab inhibited tumor growth by suppressing MVD in the CDK4/6 inhibitor-resistant tumor acquired due to RB loss, suggesting its efficacy also in patients after treatment with CDK4/6 inhibitors., Competing Interests: All the Authors are employees of Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan., (Copyright 2022, International Institute of Anticancer Research.)

Background/aim: Low expression of HER2 has defined a new "HER2-low" subgroup of breast cancer with distinct clinicopathological characteristics and both prognostic and predictive implications. The impact of low HER2 expression in metastatic hormone receptor-positive HER2-negative breast cancer treated with first-line CDK4/6 inhibitors has not been studied. Using real-world patient data, we aimed to identify prognostic differences in this patient population according to HER2 expression with immunohistochemistry., Patients and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 191 patients from 5 Oncology Department databases in Thessaloniki, Greece, with hormone receptor-positive HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer treated with CDK4/6 inhibitors in the first line, for whom detailed immunohistochemical HER2 data could be retrieved., Results: Median progression-free survival was numerically different among the different HER2 subgroups (3.35 years for HER2 0 tumors, 2.18 years for HER2 +1 tumors, 1.74 years for HER2 +2/ISH-negative tumors), but this difference was not statistically significant (p=0.477). Median PFS was statistically significantly longer in patients without visceral metastases (5.45 years) compared to patients with visceral metastases (1.61 years) (p=0.017). Median PFS was also statistically significantly longer in patients taking an aromatase inhibitor (2.99 years) compared to patients taking fulvestrant (1.33 years) (p<0.0001). There were no statistically significant differences in the other subgroups examined., Conclusion: CDK4/6 inhibitors are equally effective as first-line treatment agents, regardless of the exact level of HER2 expression. Numerical differences, however, do exist among the different HER2 subgroups, and merit further evaluation in future studies to better study this phenomenon., Competing Interests: GD declares no relevant conflict of interest. GK has received honoraria and consultancy fees from Amgen, Avaviosis, Astellas, AstraZeneca, Boehringer, BMS, Demo, Galenica, Ipsen, LEO Pharma, Merck, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, and Sanofi. EL has received honoraria and consultancy fees from AstraZeneca, Genesis Pharma, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, and Amgen. IK has received honoraria and consultancy fees from Boehringer, Sandoz, Amgen, Roche, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Novartis, Sanofi, MSD, Merck and BMS. IB has received honoraria and consultancy fees from Sandoz, Amgen, Roche, AstraZeneca, Ipsen, Pfizer, Novartis, Sanofi, Genesis Pharma, MSD, LEO pharma, Merck, Servier and BMS and Research Funding from Boehringer, Regeneron, Eli Lilly, Pfizer, Novartis, BMS, MSD and Roche. KP has received honoraria and consultancy fees from MSD, Gilead, AstraZeneca, Novartis, Eli Lilly, Roche and GSK and Research Funding from Roche, Novartis, Daiichi Sankyo, Eli Lilly, AstraZeneca, BMS, Boehringer and EISAI., (Copyright 2022, International Institute of Anticancer Research.)

Introduction: Effective treatments for hormone-receptor-positive (HR +) breast cancer (BC) following relapse/progression on nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor (NSAI) therapy are needed. Initial Breast Cancer Trials of OraL EveROlimus-2 (BOLERO-2) trial data demonstrated that everolimus and exemestane significantly prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) versus placebo plus exemestane alone in this patient population. Methods: BOLERO-2 is a phase 3, double-blind, randomized, international trial comparing everolimus (10 mg/day) plus exemestane (25 mg/day) versus placebo plus exemestane in postmenopausal women with HR + advanced BC with recurrence/progression during or after NSAIs. The primary endpoint was PFS by local investigator review, and was confirmed by independent central radiology review. Overall survival, response rate, and clinical benefit rate were secondary endpoints. Results: Final study results with median 18-month follow-up show that median PFS remained significantly longer with everolimus plus exemestane versus placebo plus exemestane [investigator review: 7.8 versus 3.2 months, respectively; hazard ratio = 0.45 (95% confidence interval 0.38–0.54); log-rank P < 0.0001; central review: 11.0 versus 4.1 months, respectively; hazard ratio = 0.38 (95% confidence interval 0.31–0.48); log-rank P < 0.0001] in the overall population and in all prospectively defined subgroups, including patients with visceral metastases, patients with recurrence during or within 12 months of completion of adjuvant therapy, and irrespective of age. The incidence and severity of adverse events were consistent with those reported at the interim analysis and in other everolimus trials. Conclusion: The addition of everolimus to exemestane markedly prolonged PFS in patients with HR + advanced BC with disease recurrence/progression following prior NSAIs. These results further support the use of everolimus plus exemestane in this patient population. ClinicalTrials.gov #NCT00863655. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction. For postmenopausal patients with hormonesensitive breast cancer, outcome is worse with increasing age at diagnosis. The aim of this study was to assess the incidence of breast cancer recurrence (locoregional and distant), and contralateral breast cancer by age at diagnosis. Methods. Patients enrolled in the Tamoxifen Exemestane Adjuvant Multinational (TEAM) trial were included. Primary endpoints were locoregional recurrence, distant recurrence, and contralateral breast cancer.Age at diagnosis was categorized as younger than 65 years, 65-74 years, and 75 years or older. Results. Overall, 9,766 patients were included, of which 5,349 were younger than 65 years (reference group), 3,060 were 65-74 years, and 1,357 were 75 years or older. With increasing age, a decreased administration of radiotherapy after breast conserving surgery (94%, 92%, and 88%, respectively) and adjuvant chemotherapy (51%, 23%, and 5%, respectively) was observed. Risk of distant recurrence increased with age at diagnosis; multivariable hazard ratio for patients aged 65-74 years was 1.20 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.00 -1.44), hazard ratio for patients aged 75 years or older was 1.39 (95% CI: 1.08 -1.79). Risks of locoregional recurrence and contralateral breast cancer were not significantly different across age groups. Conclusion. Elderly patients with breast cancer were at increased risk for distant recurrence. Other studies have shown that the risk of distant recurrence is mainly affected by adjuvant systemic therapy. All TEAM patients received adjuvant endocrine treatment; however, chemotherapy was administered less often in elderly patients. These findings are suggestive for consideration of chemotherapy in relatively fit elderly breast cancer patients with hormonesensitive disease. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background/aim: A possible role of antibody-drug conjugates against tumors with low HER2-expression, leads to the emergence of a new "low-HER2" classification in breast cancer, encompassing tumors from the hormonal-receptor-positive and the triple-negative subgroups. There is a need for data (clinical trial data and real-world evidence) that will accurately describe this population, the risk of recurrence and the possible benefit of HER2 targeted therapies., Patients and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 949 patients from our Department databases, with hormonal receptor-positive and HER2-negative early breast cancer, for whom detailed data for immunohistochemical HER2-staining could be retrieved., Results: HER2-low expression was detected in 66.6% of patients (472 IHC +1 and 160 IHC +2 and ISH-negative). Lobular, or mixed lobular and ductal cancers had a statistically significantly lower chance of being HER2-low when compared to pure infiltrative ductal carcinomas (53.1% vs. 69.3% respectively). HER2-low status was not prognostic for recurrence-free survival or response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. There was a non-significant trend for increased risk of recurrence for HER2-low, compared to HER2-0, in patients with lobular or mixed lobular and ductal carcinomas (HR=2.192, 95% CI=0.819-5.912)., Conclusion: Low expression of HER2 in hormonal receptor-positive early breast cancer does not affect prognosis but may lead to a shorter progression-free-survival in lobular and mixed ductal and lobular cancers. Despite optimal management, a large proportion of hormonal receptor-positive patients will relapse. Targeting HER2 in HER2-low cancers may offer a potential additional treatment strategy to improve survival of this group., Competing Interests: GD, EM, AI and TZ declare no relevant conflict of interest. LK has received honoraria and consultancy fees from Ipsen, BMS, Janssen, MSD and Amgen. IN has received honoraria from Roche. KP has received honoraria and consultancy fees from MSD, Gilead, AstraZeneca, Novartis, Eli Lilly, Roche, and GSK., (Copyright 2022, International Institute of Anticancer Research.)

BACKGROUND: Obesity has been associated with inferior outcomes in operable breast cancer, but the relation between body mass index (BMI) and outcomes by breast cancer subtype has not been previously evaluated. METHODS: The authors evaluated the relation between BMI and outcomes in 3 adjuvant trials coordinated by the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group that included chemotherapy regimens with doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide, including E1199, E5188, and E3189. Results are expressed as hazard ratios (HRs) from Cox proportional hazards models (HR >1 indicates a worse outcome). All P values are 2-sided. RESULTS: When evaluated as a continuous variable in trial E1199, increasing BMI within the obese (BMI, ≥30 kg/m2) and overweight (BMI, 25-29.9 kg/m2) ranges was associated with inferior outcomes in hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth receptor 2 (HER-2)/ neu-negative disease for disease-free survival (DFS; P = .0006) and overall survival (OS; P = .0007), but not in HER-2/ neu-overexpressing or triple-negative disease. When evaluated as a categorical variable, obesity was associated with inferior DFS (HR, 1.24; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.06-1.46; P = .0008) and OS (HR, 1.37; 95% CI, 1.13-1.67; P = .002) in hormone receptor-positive disease, but not other subtypes. In a model including obesity, disease subtype, and their interaction, the interaction term was significant for OS ( P = .02) and showed a strong trend for DFS ( P = .07). Similar results were found in 2 other trials (E5188, E3189). CONCLUSIONS: In a clinical trial population that excluded patients with significant comorbidities, obesity was associated with inferior outcomes specifically in patients with hormone receptor-positive operable breast cancer treated with standard chemohormonal therapy. Cancer 2012. © 2012 American Cancer Society. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to evaluate 3 different doses of (7α)-21-(4-[(diethylamino)methyl]-2 methoxyphenoxy)-7 methyl-19 norpregna-1,3,5(10)-trien-3-ol 2-hydroxy-1,2,3-propanetricarboxylate (TAS-108) in patients with recurrent, hormone-responsive breast cancer. METHODS: In this randomized, double-blind, multicenter study, TAS-108 was administered daily at a dose of 40 mg, 80 mg, or 120 mg to postmenopausal patients with locally advanced, or inoperable, or metastatic hormone-receptor positive breast cancer. The primary efficacy outcome was clinical benefit (CB), defined as the total number of patients who achieved a complete response, a partial response, or stable disease for ≥24 weeks. The study was a 2-stage design in which 19 patients per dose group were planned in the first stage. If at least 3 patients in any dose group achieved a CB, then that dose group was to be allowed to continue enrolling for the second stage, and the group could include up to a total of 60 patients. RESULTS: The 40-mg and 80-mg groups met the criterion and enrolled patients into the second stage. In the 40-mg group, there were 13 CB events in 60 patients (21.7%); and, in the 80-mg group, there were 12 CB events in 60 patients (20%). The 120-mg daily dose was stopped early, because it failed to achieve the criterion. For the 40-mg and 80-mg groups, the median time to progression was 15.0 weeks and 15.9 weeks, respectively. Only 1 drug-related serious adverse event (grade 3 hyperglycemia) was reported. CONCLUSIONS: TAS-108 at 40 mg and 80 mg daily demonstrated clinical activity with an encouraging duration of benefit. Because of its superior safety profile, TAS-108 40 mg daily is recommended for further development. Cancer 2011. © 2011 American Cancer Society. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Hormone receptor-positive advanced breast cancer is an increasing health burden. Although endocrine therapies are recognised as the most beneficial treatments for patients with hormone receptor-positive advanced breast cancer, the optimal sequence of these agents is currently undetermined. Methods: We reviewed the available data on randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of endocrine therapies in this treatment setting with particular focus on RCTs reported over the last 15 years that were designed based on power calculations on primary end points. Results: In this paper, data are reviewed in postmenopausal patients for the use of tamoxifen, aromatase inhibitors and fulvestrant. We also consider the available data on endocrine crossover studies and endocrine therapy in combination with chemotherapy or growth factor therapies. Treatment options for premenopausal patients and those with estrogen receptor-/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive tumours are also evaluated. Conclusion: We present the level of evidence available for each endocrine agent based on its efficacy in advanced breast cancer and a diagram of possible treatment pathways. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

Abstract: Fulvestrant (‘Faslodex’) is a new oestrogen receptor (ER) antagonist with no agonist effects. This report describes the experience of a single centre including 126 postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer (ABC) in a fulvestrant Compassionate Use Programme. All patients had previously received endocrine treatment for early or ABC. Patients received fulvestrant as first- (n =7), second- (n =51), third- (n =50) or fourth-line endocrine therapy (n =18) for ABC (median duration of treatment: 4 months [range 3–27+ months], follow-up: 13 months [range 1–38+ months]). Twelve patients had partial responses (PR) and 43 patients experienced stable disease (SD) ⩾6 months (objective response rate: 9.5%; clinical benefit [CB] rate: 43.6%). Ten of 12 patients with a PR had HER2-negative tumours, and 9/12 had ER-positive and progesterone receptor (PgR)-positive disease (two patients had unknown HER2 status and one had unknown ER and PgR status). Nine of the 18 patients with HER2-positive tumours experienced CB with fulvestrant. Although CB rates were similar when fulvestrant was given as first- to fourth-line endocrine treatment, the proportion of those experiencing CB who had a PR appeared to decrease when fulvestrant was used later in the sequence. Fulvestrant was well tolerated; six patients experienced adverse events (all grade I/II). These data demonstrate that fulvestrant is an effective and well-tolerated therapy for patients with ABC progressing on prior therapies. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Background: Statins are cholesterol-lowering drugs prescribed for the prevention and treatment of cardiovascular disease. Moreover, statins may possess anticancer properties and interact with receptor activator of nuclear factor κB ligand expression. We aimed at evaluating a hypothetical synergistic effect of statins with denosumab in early-stage breast cancer (BC) patients from the Austrian Breast and Colorectal Cancer Study Group (ABCSG) trial 18., Patients and Methods: ABCSG-18 (NCT00556374) is a prospective, randomized, double-blind, phase III study; postmenopausal patients with hormone receptor-positive BC receiving a nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor were randomly assigned to denosumab or placebo. In this post hoc analysis, we investigated the effects of concomitant statin therapy on recurrence risk (RR) of BC, fracture risk and bone mineral density (BMD)., Results: In the study population (n = 3420), statin therapy (n = 824) was associated with worse disease-free survival (DFS) [hazard ratio (HR) 1.35, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.04-1.75; P = 0.023]. While no significant effect of lipophilic statins (n = 710) on RR was observed (HR 1.30, 95% CI 0.99-1.72; P = 0.062), patients on hydrophilic statins (n = 87) had worse DFS compared with patients not receiving any statins (HR 2.00, 95% CI 1.09-3.66; P = 0.026). This finding was mainly driven by the effect of hydrophilic statins on DFS in the denosumab arm (HR 2.63, 95% CI 1.21-5.68; P = 0.014). However, this effect subsided after correction for confounders in the sensitivity analysis. No association between statin use and fracture risk or osteoporosis was observed., Conclusion: According to this analysis, hydrophilic statins showed a detrimental effect on DFS in the main model, which was attenuated after correction for confounders. Our data need to be interpreted with caution due to their retrospective nature and the low number of patients receiving hydrophilic statins., Competing Interests: Disclosure CM: Honoraria from Boehringer Ingelheim, MSD, Amgen and Sandoz. Travel grants from MSD, Merck. TF: Honoraria from MSD; Merck Darmstadt, Roche, BMS, Accord; Sanofi, Boehringer Ingelheim; Amgen, Pfizer. CFS: Grant support, travel grants and speaker honoraria from Novartis, Astra Zeneca, Amgen, Roche, Daiichi-Sankyo, Seagen. DE: Grant support, honoraria from Astra-Zeneca, Daiichi-Sankyo, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Pierre Fabre, Roche. RG: Honoraria, Consulting Advisory Role, Research Funding, Travel expenses, Accommodations, Expenses from AbbVie, Amgen, Astra-Zeneca, BMS, Celgene, Daiichi Sankyo, Roche, Gilead, Merck, MSD, Novartis, Sandoz, Takeda. MB: Grant support, honoraria from Amgen, Astra-Zeneca, Celgene, Daiichi Sankyo, Eli-Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Pierre Fabre, Roche, Samsung. FF: Grant support, honoraria from Myriad, Comesa, Nanostring, Bondimed, Astra-Zeneca, Eli-Lilly, Hoffmann-La Roche, Novartis, Pfizer. Founder: Breast analyzing tool, Editor oncoplastic surgery I+II: Springer. GP: Honoraria and funding from: Amgen, Pfizer, Roche, Eli-Lilly, Daiichi, Astra-Zeneca, Accord, Bondimed, Novartis, MSD. SF: Funding from Amgen. RB: Research support from Daiichi Sankyo, Novartis, Roche and honoraria from Astra-Zeneca, Celgene, Daiichi, Eli-Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Samsung, BMS and Sandoz. MG: Personal fees from Amgen, personal fees from AstraZeneca, personal fees from Eli-Lilly, personal fees from Novartis, personal fees from DaiichiSankyo, personal fees from Veracyte, personal fees from Tolmar, personal fees from Lifebrain, outside the submitted work; and an immediate family member is employed by Sandoz. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest. Data sharing Data and materials supporting the results are available upon reasonable request from the corresponding author RB (rupert.bartsch@meduniwien.ac.at)., (Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Aims: Fulvestrant is a selective oestrogen receptor (ER) degrader used in postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive advanced breast cancer. The study aim was to analyse demographics and outcomes of UK patients treated with fulvestrant monotherapy at nine representative centres., Materials and Methods: Medical records of 459 patients with locally advanced or metastatic ER-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer treated with fulvestrant between August 2011 and November 2018 at nine UK centres were reviewed. Data were collated on demographics, progression-free survival, overall survival and disease response at first radiological assessment following fulvestrant initiation. Patients still alive by December 2018 were censored., Results: Data from 429 of the 459 patients identified were eligible for inclusion in the analysis. The median age was 69 (range 21-95) and 64% (n = 275) had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0-1. Bone was the most commonly involved metastatic site (72%, n = 306). However, 295 (69%) patients had visceral involvement. Patients had received a median 2 (range 0-5) prior lines of endocrine therapy and median 0 (range 0-6) prior chemotherapies. Fulvestrant was first-line therapy in 43 patients (10%). The median duration of treatment was 5 months (range 1-88). The median progression-free survival was 5.5 months. In 51% of 350 patients radiologically assessed, there was evidence of disease response to fulvestrant. Fifteen per cent of these had a complete/partial response. Fulvestrant was discontinued predominantly due to disease progression, with 3% discontinued solely due to adverse events. The median overall survival for the whole cohort was 22.5 months (range 0-88)., Conclusions: This is one of the largest studied cohorts of breast cancer patients treated with fulvestrant. This heavily endocrine-pretreated population reflects real-life use in the UK. Within this context, our retrospective data show that patients can experience maintained disease response when treated with fulvestrant, supporting the importance of equitable availability for all UK patients., (Copyright © 2021 The Royal College of Radiologists. All rights reserved.)