101. Structural validity and invariance of the Feedback Perceptions Questionnaire
- Author
-
Jan-Willem Strijbos, Susanne Narciss, Ron Pat-El, Research and Evaluation of Educational Effectiveness, RS-Research Line Methodology & statistics (part of UHC program), and Section Methodology & Statistics
- Subjects
050101 languages & linguistics ,SEX-DIFFERENCES ,media_common.quotation_subject ,ATTRIBUTIONS ,Structural validity ,Affect (psychology) ,Structural equation modeling ,Confirmatory factor analysis ,SENDERS COMPETENCE ,Education ,Feedback ,CLASSROOM ,STUDENTS PERCEPTIONS ,Perception ,PEER-FEEDBACK ,0501 psychology and cognitive sciences ,Measurement invariance ,SCALE ,media_common ,FIT INDEXES ,Peer feedback ,05 social sciences ,050301 education ,PERFORMANCE ,Feedback perceptions ,Structural equation modelling ,SENSITIVITY ,Psychology ,0503 education ,Social psychology - Abstract
Despite a growing interest in instructional feedback, students’ feedback perceptions received limited attention. We examined the structural validity and measurement invariance of the Feedback Perceptions Questionnaire (FPQ). The FPQ measures feedback perceptions in terms of perceived fairness, usefulness, acceptance, willingness to improve, and affect. Secondary school students (N = 1486) received a fictional scenario containing Concise General Feedback or Elaborated Specific Feedback by a fictional peer. Students rated their perceptions as if they had received the feedback themselves. Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) supports the structural validity of the FPQ and its invariance for the two types of peer feedback, gender, four grade-levels and two tracks. Perceived fairness of peer feedback was a strong positive predictor of willingness to improve and affect, whereas perceived usefulness and acceptance of peer feedback showed a more complex pattern in predicting willingness to improve and affect.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF