101. Jak snadný je přechod mezi dvěma různými stanoveními troponinů?
- Author
-
Jabor, A., Vacková, T., Kettner, J., Zárubová, A., Viczénová, D., Čásenská, J., and Franeková, J.
- Subjects
- *
EXPERIMENTAL medicine , *MYOCARDIAL infarction , *CLINICAL medicine , *TROPONIN , *DATA analysis - Abstract
Objective: To assess the limitations of intended change from one type of high sensitivity (hs) cardiac troponin (cTn) to another (hs-cTnT and hs-cTnI) in a real clinical setting. Design: An observation study. Settings: Acute emergency unit, Cardiology department, Institute for clinical and experimental medicine (IKEM), Praha. Material and Methods: Parallel testing of hs-cTnT (Cobas, Roche) and hs-cTnI (Architect, Abbott) in 567 consecutive patients of cardiology emergency. Method comparison (Passing-Bablok), calculation of time interval between sampling, assessment of delta concentration between two consecutive concentrations of hs-cTn, and comparison of classification. The time intervals between two consecutive samples were sorted into tertiles, and delta concentration was evaluated for the time interval up to 6 hours. A classification of the agreement for rule-in and rule-out diagnostics was evaluated according to the ESC Guidelines 2020 (kappa statistics). Results: There were 821 pairs of hs-cTnT and hs-cTnI results. Passing-Bablok test revealed a slope of 3.07 (95% CI 2.77-3.40), an intercept of -30.1 (95% CI -3.9 to -25.0), the equation was hs-cTnI = -30.4 + 3.07 * hs-cTnT, r= 0.934, p<0.001. The delta concentrations in the 1st tertile (42-65 min), 2nd tertile (66-112 min), and 3rd tertile (115-359 min) were (median and IQR) 3.3 (1.5-5.7); 2.6 (1.3-4.5); 48.5 (3.7-172.7) ng/L for hs-cTnT and 1.4 (0.4-2.9); 1.6 (0.6-9.5); 57.8 (5.5-755.9) ng/L for hs-cTnI. The classification agreement between hs-cTnT and hs-cTnI (ESC 1hour algorithm) was 63 % (kappa 0.425) and 77 % (kappa 0.716) for ESC 2-hour algorithm). The comparison of rule-in and rule-out classification revealed up- and down classification both for hs-cTnT and hs-cTnI. Conclusion: A relationship between hs-cTnT and hs-cTnI exists, however, recalculation is impossible. A study revealed a low adherence to the recommended diagnostic algorithms with very high variability in the time intervals between sampling. The delta concentration of hs-cTnT is lower than the delta concentration of hs-cTnI for a shorter interval between samples, and vice versa, the delta concentration of hs-cTnI is higher with the longer time interval between samples. The classification agreement between hs-cTnT and hs-cTnI was moderate for the ESC 1-hour algorithm and suitable for the ESC 2hour algorithm. Switching from one type of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin to another is not trivial, and real data analysis, clinical assessment, and communication with clinicians is required. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2022