Search

Background: A major cause of mortality in patients receiving hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT) is acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), a multiorgan disorder that includes the skin, liver and gastrointestinal tract. We have previously identified elafin, a protease inhibitor overexpressed in inflamed epidermis, as a diagnostic biomarker of GVHD in the skin, the most commonly involved GVHD organ. However, our initial study was limited to a subset of patients with isolated skin GVHD. The main driver of nonrelapse mortality (NRM) in HCT patients is GI GVHD. Two biomarkers, Regenerating islet-derived 3a (REG3α) and Suppressor of tumorigenesis 2 (ST2), have since been validated as biomarkers of GI GVHD that predict long-term outcomes in patients treated for GVHD. We undertook this study to determine the utility of elafin as a prognostic biomarker of acute GVHD in the general population of previously unstudied acute GVHD patients, and to compare it to ST2 and REG3α. Study Design: 526 patients who received systemic corticosteroid treatment for skin GVHD were analyzed from the Mount Sinai Acute GVHD International Consortium (MAGIC), which includes patients from 25 HCT centers. We used ELISA to measure serum concentrations of elafin, ST2 and REG3α. Patients were divided randomly into equal training and validation sets; and we developed a competing risk regression model for 6-month NRM using elafin concentration in the training set. We developed additional models for 6-month NRM using concentrations of ST2 and REG3α, or the combination of all three biomarkers as predictors. We then constructed ROC curves to evaluate the predictive accuracy of each model and to analyze the ability of each model to stratify patients into high- and low-risk groups. We analyzed the cumulative incidence of 6-month NRM and overall survival in each model and compared the accuracy of each model in the validation set. Results: The area under the receiver operating curve (AUROC) for elafin alone was 0.55 whereas it was 0.75 and statistically superior (P = 0.02) for the combination of ST2 and REG3α. The combination of 3 biomarkers produced an AUROC of 0.76 that was not significantly better than the two biomarker model (P = 0.10). Elafin concentrations, either alone or in combination with ST2 and REG3α, did not produce higher hazard ratios of NRM (data not shown). Patients in the low-risk elafin group paradoxically demonstrated a higher incidence of 6-month NRM, although this difference was not statistically significant (17% vs. 11%, P=0.19), and both overall survival at 6 months (68% vs. 68%, P>0.99) and four-week response (78% vs. 78%, P=0.98) were similar in the low- and high-risk elafin groups (Figure 1). As demonstrated in previous data sets, the combination of ST2 and REG3α divided patients into two groups with a nearly five-fold difference in NRM (6.7% vs. 31%, P Conclusion: We demonstrated that serum elafin concentrations measured at the initiation of systemic treatment for acute GVHD in a multicenter population of patients treated systemically for acute GVHD do not predict 6-month NRM, overall survival, or treatment response. As seen in previous studies, serum concentrations of the GI GVHD biomarkers ST2 and REG3α were significant predictors of NRM and the addition of elafin levels did not improve their accuracy. These results underscore the importance of GI disease in driving NRM in patients who develop acute GVHD. Figure 1. Cumulative incidence of nonrelapse mortality and overall survival in high and low risk groups Six-month cumulative incidences of nonrelapse mortality (NRM) in high (solid line) and low (dotted line) risk groups defined by optimized biomarker thresholds (upper panels) and six-month overall survival estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method (lower panels). (A) Cumulative incidence of NRM (14%) and overall survival (75%) in the total validation set (N=263). (B) Cumulative incidence of NRM in the low (N=150) and high (N=113) elafin group (17% vs. 11%, P=0.19). Overall survival in the low and high elafin group (68% vs. 68%, P > 0.99). (C) Cumulative incidence of NRM in the low (N=175) and high (N=88) ST2 + REG3a group (6.7 vs. 31%, P < 0.001). Overall survival in the low and high ST2 + REG3a group (77% vs. 51%, P < 0.001). (D) Cumulative incidence of NRM in the low (N=180) and high (N=83) elafin + ST2 + REG3a group (7.0 vs. 30%, P < 0.001). Overall survival in the low and high elafin + ST2 + REG3a group (79% vs. 64%, P < 0.001). Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Ozbek: Viracor: Patents & Royalties: GVHD biomarker patent with royalties from Viracor. DeFilipp: Omeros, Corp.: Consultancy; Incyte Corp.: Research Funding; Regimmune Corp.: Research Funding; Syndax Pharmaceuticals, Inc: Consultancy. Grupp: Novartis, Kite, Vertex, and Servier: Research Funding; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Other: Steering committee, Research Funding; Novartis, Roche, GSK, Humanigen, CBMG, Eureka, and Janssen/JnJ: Consultancy; Novartis, Adaptimmune, TCR2, Cellectis, Juno, Vertex, Allogene and Cabaletta: Other: Study steering committees or scientific advisory boards. Hexner: Blueprint medicines: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Tmunity Therapeutics: Research Funding; PharmaEssentia: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Kitko: Co-investigator on two NIH grants as part of the cGVHD consortium: Research Funding; Vanderbilt University Medical Center: Current Employment; PER: Other: PER - CME educational talks about GVHD; Horizon: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Qayed: Novartis: Honoraria; Mesoblast: Honoraria; Medexus: Honoraria. Reshef: ilead, BMS, Precision, Immatics, Atara, Takeda, Shire, Pharmacyclics, Incyte: Research Funding; Bayer: Consultancy; Gilead and Novartis: Honoraria; BMS, Regeneron, TScan, Synthekine, Atara, Jasper, Bayer: Consultancy. Levine: Incyte: Consultancy, Research Funding; Viracor: Patents & Royalties: GVHD biomarker patent with royalties from Viracor; Mesoblast: Consultancy, Research Funding; Equillium Bio: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; X4 Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Talaris Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Omeros: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Symbio: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Biogen: Research Funding; Kamada: Research Funding. Ferrara: Eurofins Viracor: Consultancy, Other: Royalties. Chen: Incyte: Consultancy; Gamida: Consultancy.

Background: Three CD19 directed CAR-T products have gained FDA approval for systemic large B-cell lymphoma. Due to heightened concerns of immune cell associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS), patients with primary CNS lymphoma (PCNSL) were excluded from all pivotal CAR-T studies. Consequently, all three products carry a limitation of use in the PCNSL patient population per their FDA labels . Due to these exclusions, little is known about the treatment-related toxicities and therapeutic potential of the currently available CD19 directed CAR-T products in this challenging patient population with significant unmet need. Methods: Based on our prior experience of tisagenlecleucel in secondary CNS lymphoma (PMID: 31320380) we conducted a pilot study with expansion of tisagenlecleucel in adults with relapsed or refractory PCNSL (NCT04134117). Patients had to be 18 years of age or older and have had progression or relapse following methotrexate-based therapy. All patients needed a confirmed diagnosis of PCNSL without evidence of systemic disease. Patients received a standard regimen of fludarabine (25 mg/m 2) and cyclophosphamide (250 mg/m 2) daily on days -5, -4, and -3 of infusion and a dose of 0.6-6.0 x 10 8 tisagenlecleucel CAR+ T-cells. Patients who had progressed on prior BTKi were allowed to continue given its beneficial effect on CAR-T expansion and function with cessation by month 3. The primary endpoint of this study was tolerability and toxicity including the rate and grade of CRS and ICANS per the 2019 ASTCT (American Society of Transplantation and Cellular Therapy) consensus criteria. Secondary endpoints included overall response rate and complete response rate to tisagenlecleucel per the international PCNSL Collaborative Group (IPCG) criteria which included MRI and CSF assessments. Exploratory endpoints included long-term efficacy, expansion, persistence and phenotype of tisagenlecleucel, cytokine profiling of the blood and CSF and CNS trafficking of CAR-T cells. Results: As of April 1, 2021, 10 subjects (ages 35-70 years) were enrolled and 9 were infused with a median age of 67 years (range, 34-81). Of the 9 infused patients, the median time from leukapheresis to infusion was 30 days (range, 27-37). Patients were heavily pretreated prior to study enrollment and received a median of 4 prior lines of anti-neoplastic therapy. All patients had progressed or failed first line high-dose methotrexate (HD-MTX); two had a history of prior thiotepa based autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT). Eight out of 9 patients had progressed following a prior BTKi and/or an immunomodulatory drug (IMiD) as part of TEDDI-R (temozolomide, etoposide, doxil, dexamethasone, ibrutinib and rituximab, n = 3), ViPOR (venetoclax, ibrutinib, prednisone, obinutuzumab and Revlimid, n = 3), or as monotherapy (n = 5) and 2 patients had received prior stereotactic radiotherapy. All patients had measurable disease at time of lymphodepletion (pre-infusion). Grade 1 CRS was observed in 6 patients with a median onset of 4 days (range, 1-5) following tisagenlecleucel and no patients required intervention for CRS. ICANS developed in 5 out of the 9 patients, only a single case of grade 3 ICANS, with a median time of onset was 5 days (range, 3-11). With a median follow-up of 7.43 months for survivors, 6/9 patients were alive with 4/9 showing ongoing responses (Figure 1). Expansion of tisagenlecleucel was demonstrated in the peripheral blood and CSF. Nanostring and RNA pathway analysis of CSF infiltrates demonstrated higher degrees of CNS CAR-T penetration in responding patients and increased T-cell and macrophage gene signatures. Peripheral and CSF cytokines were assessed. Conclusion: Tisagenlecleucel in r/r PCNSL was safe and efficacious in a highly refractory group of patients with significant unmet need. The majority of patients demonstrated a response per IPCG, including responses beyond 12 months. Tisagenlecleucel was found to expand in the peripheral blood and CNS with CSF gene signatures suggestive of higher CAR-T cell infiltrates in responding patients. Full trial safety data as well as additional follow-up and correlative studies will be presented. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Frigault: Editas: Consultancy; Iovance: Consultancy; Arcellx: Consultancy; Kite: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy. Dietrich: Unum: Consultancy; Blue Earth Diagnostics: Consultancy; Magnolia: Consultancy; Gamaka Bio: Consultancy; Beacon Biosignals: Research Funding; Boehringer Ingelheim: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Medimmune: Research Funding; Acerta: Research Funding; Orbus: Research Funding. Jordan: CereXis: Consultancy; Recursion: Consultancy; Navio Theragnostics: Consultancy. Forst: Eli Lilly: Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company. Plotkin: AstraZeneca: Consultancy; Akuous: Consultancy; NFlection Therapeutics: Other: Co-founder; NF2 Therapeutics: Other: Co-founder. Spitzer: Qihan Bio: Consultancy; Bluebird Bio: Consultancy; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Syneos Health: Consultancy. Defilipp: Omeros, Corp.: Consultancy; Incyte Corp.: Research Funding; Regimmune Corp.: Research Funding; Syndax Pharmaceuticals, Inc: Consultancy. Maus: Tmunity: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Micromedicine: Consultancy, Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company; Kite Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; GSK: Consultancy; Intellia: Consultancy; In8bio (SAB): Consultancy; CRISPR therapeutics: Consultancy; Cabaletta Bio (SAB): Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Bayer: Consultancy; Atara: Consultancy; AstraZeneca: Consultancy; Astellas: Consultancy; Arcellx: Consultancy; Agenus: Consultancy; Adaptimmune: Consultancy; tcr2: Consultancy, Divested equity in a private or publicly-traded company in the past 24 months; century: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; ichnos biosciences: Consultancy, Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company; Torque: Consultancy, Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company; WindMIL: Consultancy. Chen: Gamida: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy.

Disease burden prior to hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is difficult to assess in myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), particularly in patients without excess blasts. We assessed whether morphologic dysplasia at the time of transplant can be a metric of disease burden that is associated with post-transplant outcomes in MDS patients. We identified 84 MDS patients undergoing allogeneic HCT at our institution between 2010 and 2017 who received a bone marrow evaluation immediately prior to HCT. Dysplasia was independently determined by two hematopathologists blinded to existing pathology reports. Erythroid nuclear dysplasia, but not megakaryocytic or myeloid, was associated with post-HCT outcomes. Presence compared to absence of erythroid nuclear dysplasia was associated with lower 2-year progression-free survival (PFS; 34 % vs 62 %, p = 0.0495) and 2-year overall survival (OS; 34 % vs 62 %, p = 0.042). In a multivariate analysis including age, IPSS-R at the time of transplant, pre-HCT therapy, and donor type as covariates, erythroid nuclear dysplasia remained associated with lower PFS (HR 2.6, p = 0.036) and OS (HR 2.7, p = 0.028). Dysplasia assessment prior to transplant may serve as an estimate of disease burden in MDS and identify high-risk patients who merit additional therapies pre- or post-transplant.

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients often undergo allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT) in first complete remission (CR). We examined the effect of depth of clinical response, including incomplete count recovery (CRi) and/or measurable residual disease (MRD), in patients from the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplantation Research (CIBMTR) registry. We identified 2492 adult patients (1799 CR and 693 CRi) who underwent alloHCT between January 1, 2007 and December 31, 2015. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS). Multivariable analysis was performed to adjust for patient-, disease-, and transplant-related factors. Baseline characteristics were similar. Patients in CRi compared to those in CR had an increased likelihood of death (HR: 1.27; 95% confidence interval: 1.13-1.43). Compared to CR, CRi was significantly associated with increased non-relapse mortality (NRM), shorter disease-free survival (DFS), and a trend toward increased relapse. Detectable MRD was associated with shorter OS, shorter DFS, higher NRM, and increased relapse compared to absence of MRD. The deleterious effects of CRi and MRD were independent. In this large CIBMTR cohort, survival outcomes differ among AML patients based on depth of CR and presence of MRD at the time of alloHCT. Further studies should focus on optimizing post-alloHCT outcomes for patients with responses less than CR.

Disease relapse after hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is a major cause of treatment failure for patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Maintenance therapy after HCT for patients with targetable mutations such as mutated IDH1 or IDH2 may improve outcomes, and clinical trials evaluating this strategy are ongoing. However, clinical outcomes of IDH1- and IDH2-mutated AML patients after HCT have not been well described. The primary objective of this study was to describe the clinical characteristics and post-HCT outcomes of IDH-mutated AML patients. Survival outcomes included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival, and cumulative incidences of relapse and nonrelapse mortality. In this multicenter retrospective analysis, 112 adult patients with IDH1- or IDH2-mutated AML who underwent HCT and did not receive an IDH inhibitor as maintenance therapy after HCT were identified at Massachusetts General Hospital, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, and Ohio State University. Mutation testing was performed using next-generation sequencing panels. Patient characteristics were collected retrospectively, and their survival outcomes were analyzed. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed. The median patient age was 64.1 years. The median follow-up was 27.5 months. Among patients, 78.5% had intermediate- or adverse-risk disease by European LeukemiaNET criteria. Fifty-eight percent of patients received intensive induction chemotherapy, 82% of patients underwent HCT during first complete remission (CR) or CR with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi), and 34% of patients received myeloablative conditioning. Frequently detected co-mutations were DNMT3A (35.7%), NPM1 (33.1%), and FLT3-ITD (13.4%); TP53 mutations were detected in 3.6% of patients. For IDH1-mutated patients transplanted during first CR/CRi, the 1- and 2-year PFS was 75% and 58%, respectively. For IDH2-mutated patients transplanted in first CR/CRi, the 1- and 2-year PFS was 64% and 58%, respectively. The 2-year cumulative incidence of relapse was 31% and 25% for IDH1- and IDH2-mutated cohorts, respectively. Multivariable analysis suggested first CR/CRi and age ≤60 was associated with improved outcomes for IDH2-mutated patients. To date, this is the largest multicenter study of outcomes of IDH-mutated AML patients after HCT. Our analysis provides important benchmarks for analysis and interpretation of results emerging from clinical trials evaluating maintenance IDH1 and IDH2 inhibitor therapy for AML patients after HCT.

BACKGROUND Autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (auto-HCT) is a standard therapy for relapsed classic Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL); however, long-term outcomes are not well described. METHODS This study analyzed survival, nonrelapse mortality, late effects, and subsequent malignant neoplasms (SMNs) in 1617 patients who survived progression-free for ≥2 years after auto-HCT for cHL or DLBCL between 1990 and 2008. The median age at auto-HCT was 40 years; the median follow-up was 10.6 years. RESULTS The 5-year overall survival rate was 90% (95% confidence interval [CI], 87%-92%) for patients with cHL and 89% (95% CI, 87%-91%) for patients with DLBCL. The risk of late mortality in comparison with the general population was 9.6-fold higher for patients with cHL (standardized mortality ratio [SMR], 9.6) and 3.4-fold higher for patients with DLBCL (SMR, 3.4). Relapse accounted for 44% of late deaths. At least 1 late effect was reported for 9% of the patients. A total of 105 SMNs were confirmed: 44 in the cHL group and 61 in the DLBCL group. According to a multivariate analysis, older age, male sex, a Karnofsky score < 90, total body irradiation (TBI) exposure, and a higher number of lines of chemotherapy before auto-HCT were risk factors for overall mortality in cHL. Risk factors in DLBCL were older age and TBI exposure. A subanalysis of 798 adolescent and young adult patients mirrored the outcomes of the overall study population. CONCLUSIONS Despite generally favorable outcomes, 2-year survivors of auto-HCT for cHL or DLBCL have an excess late-mortality risk in comparison with the general population and experience an assortment of late complications. Cancer 2018;124:816-25. © 2017 American Cancer Society.

For patients with hematologic malignancies undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation, umbilical cord blood transplantation (UCBT) has become an acceptable alternative donor source in the absence of a matched sibling or unrelated donor. To date, however, there have been few published series dedicated solely to describing the outcomes of adult patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) who have undergone UCBT. Between 2004 and 2013, 176 adults with MDS underwent UCBT as reported to the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research. Median age at the time of transplantation was 56 years (range, 18-73 years). The study group included 10% with very low, 23% with low, 19% with intermediate, 19% with high, and 13% with very high-risk Revised International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS-R) scores. The 100-day probability of grade II-IV acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) was 38%, and the 3-year probability of chronic GVHD was 28%. The probabilities of relapse and transplantation-related mortality (TRM) at 3 years were 32% and 40%, respectively, leading to a 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) of 28% and an overall survival (OS) of 31%. In multivariate analysis, increasing IPSS-R score at the time of HCT was associated with inferior TRM (P = .0056), DFS (P = .018), and OS (P = .0082), but not with GVHD or relapse. The presence of pretransplantation comorbidities was associated with TRM (P = .001), DFS (P = .02), and OS (P = .001). Reduced-intensity conditioning was associated with increased risk of relapse (relative risk, 3.95; 95% confidence interval, 1.78-8.75; P .001), and although a higher proportion of myeloablative UCBTs were performed in patients with high-risk disease, the effect of conditioning regimen intensity was the same regardless of IPSS-R score. For some individuals who lack a matched sibling or unrelated donor, UCBT can result in long-term DFS; however, the success of UCBT in this population is hampered by a high rate of TRM.

BACKGROUND Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) offers curative potential to a number of older patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in their first complete remission. However, there are limited data in the literature concerning post-HCT outcomes for older patients in their second complete remission (CR2). METHODS The purpose of the current study was to retrospectively investigate within the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research database parameters influencing posttransplant outcomes for patients 60 years of age or older undergoing HCT for AML in CR2. RESULTS In total, 196 patients from 78 centers were identified; the median age was 64 years (range, 60-78 years). Seventy-one percent had a Karnofsky performance status ≥ 90 at the time of HCT. Reduced-intensity conditioning regimens were used in 159 patients (81%). A univariate analysis demonstrated a 3-year overall survival (OS) rate of 42% (95% confidence interval [CI], 35%-49%), a leukemia-free survival rate of 37% (95% CI, 30%-44%), a cumulative incidence of nonrelapse mortality of 25% (95% CI, 19%-32%), and a cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) of 38% (95% CI, 31%-45%). A multivariate analysis demonstrated that cytogenetic risk was the only independent risk factor for OS (P = .023) with a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.14 (95% CI, 0.59-2.19) for intermediate-risk cytogenetics and an HR of 2.32 (95% CI, 1.05-5.14) for unfavorable-risk cytogenetics. For CIR, cytogenetic risk was also the only independent prognostic factor (P = .01) with an HR of 1.10 (95% CI, 0.47-2.56) for intermediate-risk cytogenetics and an HR of 2.98 (95% CI, 1.11-8.00) for unfavorable-risk cytogenetics. CONCLUSIONS Allogeneic HCT is a curative treatment option for older patients with AML in CR2, particularly for those with favorable or intermediate cytogenetic risk. Cancer 2017;123:2035–2042. © 2017 American Cancer Society.

Characterization of molecular alterations in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) has led to development of targeted therapies, including FLT3 and IDH1/2 inhibitors. Maintenance therapy following hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) has shown substantial promise. Enasidenib (ENA), a selective IDH2 inhibitor, was associated with impressive rates of response in relapsed/refractory (R/R) AML and is now FDA-approved for this indication. We sought to assess the tolerability and define the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of ENA as maintenance following HCT for IDH2-mutated myeloid malignancy. HCT-eligible patients (pts) ≥ 18 years with AML in remission, or myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) with 1000/µL and platelets > 50000/µL). Those with prior HCT, active disease, QTc ≥450ms, and active infections were excluded. ENA was initiated between day 30 and 90 after HCT, at which time the following were required: chimerism ≥70% of donor origin among blood/marrow cells, no acute graft versus host disease (aGVHD) requiring ≥0.5mg/kg/day prednisone or equivalent, and no relapse. ENA was taken orally (po) daily (qd) in 28-day cycles. The period for dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) evaluation was the first cycle, escalation to successive levels was guided by DLT incidence, and 2 levels (50mg,100mg) were studied. Following establishment of MTD or recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D), 10 pts would be enrolled in an expansion cohort. Pts were monitored for relapse and toxicity and continued until disease progression, intolerable toxicity, or receipt of 12 cycles. Nineteen pts have been registered prior to HCT at 3 sites, Massachusetts General Hospital, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, and Johns Hopkins Hospital. Three pts could not initiate ENA following HCT; 2 due to logistic challenges of the COVID pandemic and 1 due to relapse. The remaining 16 pts initiated ENA treatment. The median age was 61 years (range 31-76); 12 (75%) were male, and 13 (81%) were Caucasian. Fourteen (88%) had AML, of which 6 were AML with MDS related changes and 2 had antecedent myeloproliferative neoplasm. Two pts (13%) had MDS. Among these 16 pts, 9 (56%) had IDH2 R140, and 5 (25%) had IDH2 R172 mutations. IDH2 subtype data was unavailable for 2 pts. Of 15 pts with available data from time of diagnosis, 11 (73%) had intermediate-risk and 4 (27%) had adverse-risk cytogenetics. Among these 15 pts, common concurrent mutations were DNMT3A (47%), SRSF2 (33%), and RUNX1 (33%). Eleven AML pts (85%) received intensive versus non-intensive therapies (15%) prior to HCT, and among all pts, 7 (44%) had received ENA prior to HCT. HCT data was available for all 16 pts; 4 pts (25%) received myeloablative, and 12 (75%) received reduced-intensity conditioning. Nine pts (56%) had a matched unrelated, 6 (38%) had haploidentical, and 1 (6%) had a matched related donor HCT. Three pts were enrolled at the 50mg dose level, 6 pts at 100mg, and after no DLTs were detected, the remaining were enrolled in an expansion cohort at 100mg qd. Median follow-up (F/U) for surviving patients is currently 11.7 months (range 1.5-18.9). 2 pts (13%) have relapsed during F/U, at 96 and 364 days post HCT. Additional ≥grade (G) 3 toxicities detected during treatment, possibly or probably related to ENA, included neutropenia, anemia, and bilirubinemia. Six pts (38%) required dose interruptions lasting a median 19 days (range 7-25), 4 required a dose reduction to 50mg, and 1 stopped treatment due to G3 bilirubinemia. In total, 3 pts (18%) discontinued study treatment, 1 for aforementioned G3 bilirubinemia, 1 to pursue a GVHD trial, and 1 for relapse. Six pts have completed the 12-month f/u without relapse, and 7 remain on study. 15 of 16 pts remain alive. Thus far, 3 pts have experienced ≥ G2 aGVHD, and 4 had moderate chronic GVHD. Serial measurement of 2HG is being conducted on samples, and these will be reported. Enasidenib is well-tolerated as post-HCT maintenance therapy for myeloid malignancy at the RP2D of 100mg qd. No DLTs have been detected, and a low rate of post-HCT relapse has been identified to date, although longer f/u is needed. Larger, randomized studies of ENA in the post-SCT setting would determine the true efficacy of this agent as maintenance therapy. Disclosures Fathi: Blueprint: Consultancy; Jazz: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Newlink Genetics: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Agios: Consultancy, Research Funding; PTC Therapeutics: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Boston Biomedical: Consultancy; Amphivena: Consultancy; BMS/Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Kite: Consultancy; Trovagene: Consultancy; Forty Seven: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy; Astellas: Consultancy; Trillium: Consultancy; Kura Oncology: Consultancy. Soiffer:Gilead: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Juno: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; VOR Biopharma: Consultancy; alexion: Consultancy; Rheos Therapeutics: Consultancy; Cugene: Consultancy; Precision Bioscience: Consultancy; Be the Match/ National Marrow Donor Program: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kiadis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Mana Therapeutics: Consultancy. Levis:Menarini: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; FujiFilm: Honoraria, Research Funding; Astellas: Honoraria, Research Funding; Daiichi-Sankyo: Honoraria. Mims:Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Kura Oncology: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Leukemia and Lymphoma Society: Other: Senior Medical Director for Beat AML Study; Agios: Consultancy; Syndax Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Other: Data Safety Monitoring Board; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Devine:Magenta Therapeutics: Consultancy. Defilipp:Incyte: Research Funding; Regimmune: Research Funding; Syndax Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy. Spitzer:Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bluebird Bio: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Frigault:Celgene: Consultancy; Arcellx: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Gilead/Kite: Consultancy, Research Funding. Amrein:Amgen: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding. Hobbs:Incyte: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Bayer: Research Funding; Constellation: Honoraria, Research Funding; Jazz: Honoraria; Celgene/BMS: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria. Brunner:Janssen: Research Funding; Acceleron Pharma Inc.: Consultancy; GSK: Research Funding; Xcenda: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Jazz Pharma: Consultancy; Forty Seven, Inc: Consultancy; Celgene/BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Biogen: Consultancy; Astra Zeneca: Research Funding. Narayan:Genentech: Other: Prior Spouse employment within 24 months and prior spouse equity divested within past 24 months; Takeda: Other: Prior Spouse employment within 24 months; Sanofi-Genzyme: Other: Current Spouse employment . Chen:AbbVie: Other: Data and Safety Monitoring Board Member; Incyte Corporation: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Actinium: Other: Data and Safety Monitoring Board Member; Equillium: Other: Data and Safety Monitoring Board Member; Magenta: Consultancy; Kiadis: Consultancy. OffLabel Disclosure: Enasidenib as post-transplant maintenance therapy

Disease relapse is a major barrier to successful allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). Maintenance therapy administered after HCT is a promising strategy to attempt to reduce relapse and improve overall survival. However, many questions and challenges remain regarding this approach, including which patients should receive maintenance therapy, which agents should be used, what the ideal duration of therapy is, and what effect specific agents will have on toxicities, immunological reconstitution and graft-versus-host disease. Clinical trials are ongoing, which should help begin to address some of these issues and it is imperative that the transplantation community continues to collaborate in such trials to best answer these questions.

In the absence of prospective studies that examine the effect of conditioning regimen intensity after T-cell–replete haploidentical transplant for acute myeloid leukemia (AML), acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), and myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), a retrospective cohort analysis was performed. Of the 1325 eligible patients (AML, n = 818; ALL, n = 286; and MDS, n = 221), 526 patients received a myeloablative regimen and 799 received a reduced-intensity regimen. Graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis was uniform with posttransplant cyclophosphamide, a calcineurin inhibitor, and mycophenolate mofetil. The primary end point was disease-free survival. Cox regression models were built to study the effect of conditioning regimen intensity on transplant outcomes. For patients aged 18 to 54 years, disease-free survival was lower (hazard ratio [HR], 1.34; 42% vs 51%; P = .007) and relapse was higher (HR, 1.51; 44% vs 33%; P = .001) with a reduced-intensity regimen compared with a myeloablative regimen. Nonrelapse mortality did not differ according to regimen intensity. For patients aged 55 to 70 years, disease-free survival (HR, 0.97; 37% vs 43%; P = .83) and relapse (HR, 1.32; 42% vs 31%; P = .11) did not differ according to regimen intensity. Nonrelapse mortality was lower with reduced-intensity regimens (HR, 0.64; 20% vs 31%; P = .02). Myeloablative regimens are preferred for AML, ALL, and MDS; reduced-intensity regimens should be reserved for those unable to tolerate myeloablation.

The role of hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) in adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is reviewed and critically evaluated in this systematic evidence-based review. Specific criteria were used for searching the published literature and for grading the quality and strength of the evidence and the strength of the recommendations. A panel of ALL experts developed consensus on the treatment recommendations based on the evidence. Allogeneic HCT offers a survival benefit in selected patients with ALL, and this review summarizes the standard indications as well as the areas of controversy. There is now greater experience with pediatric-inspired chemotherapy regimens that has transformed upfront therapy for adult ALL, resulting in higher remission rates and overall survival. This in turn has increased the equipoise around decision making for ALL in first complete remission (CR1) when there is no measurable residual disease (MRD) at the end of induction and/or consolidation. Randomized studies are needed for adults with ALL to compare allogeneic HCT in CR1 with pediatric-inspired chemotherapy alone. Indications for transplantation in the evolving landscape of MRD assessments and novel targeted and immune therapeutics remain important areas of investigation.

Galectin-3 is a beta-galactoside-binding lectin with an established association to inflammatory and fibrotic conditions. We investigated galectin-3 levels in 68 recipients of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) to look for associations with chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD). Plasma galectin-3 concentrations were measured at 1 year post-HCT and correlated with clinical data collected from individual medical records. The median serum galectin-3 level at that time point was 14.9 ng/mL (range, 5.5–61.6), which was significantly higher than that among healthy controls (14.9 versus 6.2, p < 0.001). Furthermore, patients with active cGVHD at the time of sample collection had higher median levels as compared to those without cGVHD (16.9 versus 13, p = 0.03). In a multivariable logistic model, there was no significant association between the presence of cGVHD at the date of sample collection and elevated galectin-3 levels (>14.9 ng/mL) (odds ratio [OR]: 2.03 (0.60, 6.88), p = 0.26). However, among patients with cGVHD at the date of sample collection, active systemic corticosteroid therapy was associated with elevated galectin-3 levels (OR: 20.32 (1.66, 249.39), p = 0.02). Furthermore, in a competing risk regression model, elevated galectin-3 levels at 1 year post-HCT were not associated with future development of moderate or severe cGVHD (OR: 1.24 (0.21, 7.45), p = 0.81). In conclusion, plasma galectin-3 concentrations are elevated in recipients of allo-HCT, especially among patients with cGVHD. Further investigation will be required to determine whether galectin-3 has a pathophysiologic role in cGVHD or serves as a marker of ongoing inflammation following allogeneic HCT.

In this multicenter Phase 2 single arm study, we substituted low dose total body irradiation (TBI) for antithymocyte globulin (ATG) in a reduced intensity conditioning regimen with the intent to lower the risk for viral infections after double umbilical cord blood (UCB) transplantation. The conditioning regimen consisted of fludarabine (30 mg/m2/day, Day −7 to −2), melphalan (100 mg/m2/day, Day −1), and TBI (200cGy, Day 0). Graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis was sirolimus and tacrolimus. Thirty-one patients were treated on the protocol. The median time of follow-up for survivors was 24 months (range, 3.3–55.1). Nineteen patients experienced a total of 24 clinically significant viral reactivations or infections, with 1-year cumulative incidence rate of first significant viral event as 64% (95% CI, 43–79%), compared with our historical control of 53%. Within the context of these 24 clinically significant viral reactivations, there were a total of 10 infections with organ involvement. Nonrelapse mortality was 28% (95% CI 13–45%) at 2 years. The 2-year overall and progression-free survivals were 53% (95% CI 33–69%) and 47% (95% CI 28–64%), respectively. In conclusion, the substitution of low dose TBI for ATG did not decrease the incidence of significant viral events after UCB transplantation.

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells targeting CD19 have emerged as a leading engineered T-cell therapy for relapsed/refractory B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma. The phase 1/2 clinical trials that led to US Food and Drug Administration approval excluded patients with central nervous system (CNS) involvement, due to strict eligibility criteria. Here, we report on our institutional experience with 8 secondary CNS lymphoma patients treated with commercial tisagenlecleucel. No patient experienced greater than grade 1 neurotoxicity, and no patient required tocilizumab or steroids for CAR T-cell–mediated toxicities. Biomarker analysis suggested CAR T-cell expansion, despite the absence of systemic disease, and early response assessments demonstrated activity of IV infused CAR T cells within the CNS space.

Hematologic malignancies treated with allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) have a variable incidence of post-transplantation central nervous system (CNS) relapse, with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) representing the most common disease histology. Although data supporting post-transplantation CNS prophylaxis for ALL in the pre-CNS penetrant systemic therapy era established this as standard practice, controversy exists regarding the role of post-transplantation CNS prophylaxis in the contemporary era. Here we review the most relevant (albeit exclusively retrospective) literature to date on the role of post-transplantation CNS prophylaxis in ALL. Given the paucity of data supporting the routine practice of post-transplantation CNS prophylaxis for ALL in the contemporary era, this position statement is anticipated to further stoke controversy and discussion within the transplantation community. Ultimately, only well-designed prospective clinical studies will elucidate the role of routine post-transplantation CNS prophylaxis.

Delayed reconstitution of the immune system after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is a long-recognized complication. Specifically, loss of T-cell diversity has been implicated in infectious complications, graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), and disease relapse. We performed serial high-resolution next generation sequencing using the immunoSEQ® Assay (Adaptive Biotechnologies, Seattle, WA) to characterize the TCRβ locus in 99 HCT recipients in the first 3 months after transplant. Transplant donor type included unrelated (n=57) and related (n=42) donors. Conditioning regimen intensity included reduced intensity (n=55) and myeloablative (n=44). We measured T-cell fraction, clonality, and richness in the donor and at days +15, +30, +50 and +100 post-transplant in the recipient, and correlated metrics to clinical variables. In agreement with prior studies, we found that although absolute T-cell numbers recover relatively quickly after transplant, repertoire diversity remains diminished. Restricted diversity was associated with conditioning intensity, use of ATG, and donor type. Increased T-cell clonal expansion at Day +30 compared to the donor sample was associated with the incidence of acute GVHD (HR=1.11, p=5x10-5). Even after exclusion of the twelve patients who had experienced acute GVHD by day +30, the association between acute GVHD and clonal expansion persisted (HR=1.098, p=0.041), indicating that clonal expansion preceded the development of acute GVHD. Our results indicate the importance of early post-transplant sampling and highlight T-cell clonal expansion as a potential novel biomarker for GVHD which warrants further study. Citation Format: Rachel M. Gittelman, Mark Leick, Zachariah DeFilipp, Jerome Ritz, Erik Yusko, Catherine Sanders, Harlan Robins. T-cell clonal dynamics determined by high resolution TCR-β sequencing in recipients of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research 2020; 2020 Apr 27-28 and Jun 22-24. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(16 Suppl):Abstract nr LB-272.

There are no validated biomarkers that measure a patient's response to therapy for acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), the leading cause of non-relapse mortality (NRM) after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT). Recent studies from the Mount Sinai Acute GVHD International Consortium (MAGIC) have validated an algorithm probability (MAP) that combines serum concentrations of two biomarkers of GVHD (REG3α and ST2) to generate an estimated probability of 6 month NRM for individual patients. The MAP estimates GVHD-mediated damage to crypts throughout the lower GI tract at single time points (Hartwell et al., JCI Insight, 2017; Major- Monfried et al., Blood, 2018). We hypothesized that the change in MAP between start of treatment and 28 days later could serve as a response biomarker and would compare favorably to clinical response, the gold standard which is widely used as a surrogate for long term survival and is the primary endpoint in most GVHD treatment trials (Martin et al., BBMT, 2009; MacMillan et al., Blood, 2010). We prospectively collected serum samples and clinical staging from 368 sequential HCT patients who received systemic treatment for acute GVHD in one of 20 MAGIC centers between January 2016 and February 2018. We computed MAPs and clinical responses for each patient. MAPs of patients who experienced 6 month NRM increased significantly compared to MAPs of patients who survived (p=0.0004). In patients whose initial MAPs were low (Ann Arbor 1, MAP 0.290), those who survived tended to have the largest decreases in MAP (Fig 1C). We found that patients whose MAPs rose above the previously determined high-risk threshold MAP of 0.290 had significantly worse survival compared to those who remained below it, whereas the large number patients with initially high MAPs that remained above the threshold had a large increase in mortality (Fig 2). When measured at day 28, MAPs predicted NRM more accurately than clinical responses, with areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.86 and 0.70, respectively (p We conclude that the MAP is, to our knowledge, the first laboratory test validated as a response biomarker for acute GVHD treatment and more accurately predicts survival than clinical response after 28 days of treatment. The MAP may serve as a novel endpoint in future trials of GVHD treatment.

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) is a potentially curative treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). Optimal conditioning intensity for allo-HCT for CML in the era of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) is unknown. Using the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research database, we sought to determine whether reduced-intensity/nonmyeloablative conditioning (RIC) allo-HCT and myeloablative conditioning (MAC) result in similar outcomes in CML patients. We evaluated 1395 CML allo-HCT recipients between the ages of 18 and 60 years. The disease status at transplant was divided into the following categories: chronic phase 1, chronic phase 2 or greater, and accelerated phase. Patients in blast phase at transplant and alternative donor transplants were excluded. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS) after allo-HCT. MAC (n = 1204) and RIC allo-HCT recipients (n = 191) from 2007 to 2014 were included. Patient, disease, and transplantation characteristics were similar, with a few exceptions. Multivariable analysis showed no significant difference in OS between MAC and RIC groups. In addition, leukemia-free survival and nonrelapse mortality did not differ significantly between the 2 groups. Compared with MAC, the RIC group had a higher risk of early relapse after allo-HCT (hazard ratio [HR], 1.85; P = .001). The cumulative incidence of chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) was lower with RIC than with MAC (HR, 0.77; P = .02). RIC provides similar survival and lower cGVHD compared with MAC and therefore may be a reasonable alternative to MAC for CML patients in the TKI era.

Disruption of the intestinal microbiome early after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) has been linked to adverse outcomes in transplant recipients. To date, whether microbiome-directed interventions will be able to impact important clinical endpoints remains unknown. Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is a compelling intervention to restore healthy diversity to the intestinal microenvironment after allo-HCT, but currently has no established role in transplant recipients. In this review, we examine the use of FMT as treatment for Clostridium difficile infection and acute graft-versus-host disease, and also as a restorative intervention early after allo-HCT. Ongoing and planned studies will help determine the ultimate role of FMT in allo-HCT recipients.

Ocular graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) occurs in more than half of patients who develop chronic GVHD after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT), causing prolonged morbidity, which affects activities of daily living and quality of life. Here we provide an expert review of ocular GVHD in a collaboration between transplant physicians and ophthalmologists through the Late Effects and Quality of Life Working Committee of the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research and the Transplant Complications Working Party of the European Society of Blood and Marrow Transplantation. Recent updates in ocular GVHD, regarding pathophysiology, preclinical models, risk factors, prevention, screening, diagnosis, response criteria, evaluation measures, and treatment are discussed in this review. Ocular GVHD has at least three biological processes: lacrimal gland dysfunction, meibomian gland dysfunction, and corneoconjunctival inflammation. Preclinical models have found several novel pathogenic mechanisms, including renin angiotensin system and endoplasmic reticulum stress signaling that can be targeted by therapeutic agents. Many studies have identified reliable tests for establishing diagnosis and response assessment of ocular GVHD. Efficacy of systemic and topical treatment for ocular GVHD is summarized. It is important for all health professionals taking care of HCT recipients to have adequate knowledge of ocular GVHD for optimal care.

Total body irradiation (TBI) has been included in standard conditioning for acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) before hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). Non-TBI regimens have incorporated busulfan (Bu) to decrease toxicity. This retrospective study analyzed TBI and Bu on outcomes of ALL patients 18–60 years old, in first or second complete remission (CR), undergoing HLA-compatible sibling, related, or unrelated donor HCT, who reported to the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research from 2005 to 2014. TBI plus etoposide (25%) or cyclophosphamide (75%) was used in 819 patients, and intravenous Bu plus fludarabine (41%), clofarabine (30%), cyclophosphamide (15%), or melphalan (13%) was used in 299 patients. Bu-containing regimens were analyzed together, since no significant differences for patient outcomes were noted between them. Bu patients were older, with better performance status; took longer to achieve first CR and receive HCT; were treated more recently; and were more likely to receive peripheral blood grafts, antithymocyte globulin, or tyrosine kinase inhibitors. With median follow-up of 3.6 years for Bu and 5.3 years for TBI, adjusted 3-year outcomes showed treatment-related mortality Bu 19% versus TBI 25% (P = .04); relapse Bu 37% versus TBI 28% (P = .007); disease-free survival (DFS) Bu 45% versus TBI 48% (P = .35); and overall survival (OS) Bu 57% versus TBI 53% (P = .35). In multivariate analysis, Bu patients had higher risk of relapse (relative risk, 1.46; 95% confidence interval, 1.15 to 1.85; P = .002) compared with TBI patients. Despite the higher relapse, Bu-containing conditioning led to similar OS and DFS following HCT for ALL.

The intestinal microbiota in allogeneic bone marrow transplant (allo-BMT) recipients modulates graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), a systemic inflammatory state initiated by donor T cells that leads to colitis, a key determinant of GVHD severity. Indole or indole derivatives produced by tryptophan metabolism in the intestinal microbiota limit intestinal inflammation caused by diverse stressors, so we tested their capacity to protect against GVHD in murine major histocompatibility complex–mismatched models of allo-BMT. Indole effects were assessed by colonization of allo-BMT recipient mice with tryptophanase positive or negative strains of Escherichia coli, or, alternatively, by exogenous administration of indole-3-carboxaldehyde (ICA), an indole derivative. Treatment with ICA limited gut epithelial damage, reduced transepithelial bacterial translocation, and decreased inflammatory cytokine production, reducing GVHD pathology and GVHD mortality, but did not compromise donor T-cell-mediated graft-versus-leukemia responses. ICA treatment also led to recipient-strain-specific tolerance of engrafted T cells. Transcriptional profiling and gene ontology analysis indicated that ICA administration upregulated genes associated with the type I interferon (IFN1) response, which has been shown to protect against radiation-induced intestinal damage and reduce subsequent GVHD pathology. Accordingly, protective effects of ICA following radiation exposure were abrogated in mice lacking IFN1 signaling. Taken together, these data indicate that indole metabolites produced by the intestinal microbiota act via type I IFNs to limit intestinal inflammation and damage associated with myeloablative chemotherapy or radiation exposure and acute GVHD, but preserve antitumor responses, and may provide a therapeutic option for BMT patients at risk for GVHD.

We hypothesized that third-party fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) may restore intestinal microbiome diversity after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT). In this open-label single-group pilot study, 18 subjects were enrolled before allo-HCT and planned to receive third-party FMT capsules. FMT capsules were administered no later than 4 weeks after neutrophil engraftment, and antibiotics were not allowed within 48 hours before FMT. Five patients did not receive FMT because of the development of early acute gastrointestinal (GI) graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) before FMT (n = 3), persistent HCT-associated GI toxicity (n = 1), or patient decision (n = 1). Thirteen patients received FMT at a median of 27 days (range, 19-45 days) after HCT. Participants were able to swallow and tolerate all FMT capsules, meeting the primary study endpoint of feasibility. FMT was tolerated well, with 1 treatment-related significant adverse event (abdominal pain). Two patients subsequently developed acute GI GVHD, with 1 patient also having concurrent bacteremia. No additional cases of bacteremia occurred. Median follow-up for survivors is 15 months (range, 13-20 months). The Kaplan-Meier estimates for 12-month overall survival and progression-free survival after FMT were 85% (95% confidence interval, 51%-96%) and 85% (95% confidence interval, 51%-96%), respectively. There was 1 nonrelapse death resulting from acute GI GVHD (12-month nonrelapse mortality, 8%; 95% confidence interval, 0%-30%). Analysis of stool composition and urine 3-indoxyl sulfate concentration indicated improvement in intestinal microbiome diversity after FMT that was associated with expansion of stool-donor taxa. These results indicate that empiric third-party FMT after allo-HCT appears to be feasible, safe, and associated with expansion of recipient microbiome diversity. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02733744.

Ocular graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) occurs in more than one-half of patients who develop chronic GVHD after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT), causing prolonged morbidity that affects activities of daily living and quality of life. Here we provide an expert review of ocular GVHD in a collaboration between transplantation physicians and ophthalmologists through the Late Effects and Quality of Life Working Committee of the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research and the Transplant Complications Working Party of the European Society of Blood and Marrow Transplantation. Recent updates in ocular GVHD regarding pathophysiology, preclinical models, risk factors, prevention, screening, diagnosis, response criteria, evaluation measures, and treatment are discussed. Ocular GVHD involves at least 3 biological processes: lacrimal gland dysfunction, meibomian gland dysfunction, and corneoconjunctival inflammation. Preclinical models have identified several novel pathogenic mechanisms, including the renin angiotensin system and endoplasmic reticulum stress signaling, which can be targeted by therapeutic agents. Numerous studies have identified reliable tests for establishing diagnosis and response assessment of ocular GVHD. The efficacy of systemic and topical treatment for ocular GVHD is summarized. It is important that all health professionals caring for HCT recipients have adequate knowledge of ocular GVHD to provide optimal care. ispartof: Biol Blood Marrow Transplant vol:25 issue:2 pages:e46-e54 ispartof: location:United States status: published

The use of prophylactic antibiotics during the peritransplant period is common in hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) in an effort to reduce the risk for bacterial bloodstream infections. However, evidence supporting improved outcomes with this practice is limited. Furthermore, there are potential consequences to antibiotic exposure, including increased risk for the development of antibiotic resistance and disruption of the intestinal microbiome. We reviewed our institutional experience in patients receiving peritransplant prophylaxis with ciprofloxacin (500 mg twice daily starting from Day -1 until neutrophil engraftment or escalation of therapy for treatment of febrile neutropenia or infection). We compared outcomes of 84 consecutive patients (auto-HCT: 39; allo-HCT: 45) undergoing first HCT who did not receive ciprofloxacin prophylaxis during a 6-month trial period with 204 consecutive patients (auto-HCT: 107; allo-HCT: 97) that received prophylaxis in the 6-month periods before and after the trial period. Patient and transplant characteristics are shown in Table 1. We found antibiotic prophylaxis to be associated with lower rates of bacterial bloodstream infections (auto-HCT: 5.6% vs 18%, p=0.023; allo-HCT: 14% vs 27%, p=0.072) as compared those not receiving antibiotic prophylaxis. Amongst patients undergoing allo-HCT, severe (grade 3-4) acute graft-versus-host disease was rare and there was no difference in the incidence between the groups (prophylaxis: 5.2% vs no prophylaxis: 8.9%, p=0.37). Additionally, there was no difference in 100-day non-relapse mortality (4.1% vs 4.4%, p=0.90) or 1-year overall survival (77% vs 71%, p=0.55) between allo-HCT patients receiving prophylactic antibiotics or not. In multivariate analysis, the use of antibiotic prophylaxis was associated with a decreased risk for bacterial bloodstream infections in auto-HCT recipients (HR 0.3, 95%CI 0.1-0.85, p=0.023) and allo-HCT recipients (HR 0.46, 95%CI 0.21-1.0, p=0.050). In conclusion, the use of prophylactic ciprofloxacin during the peritransplant period may protect against bacterial bloodstream infections. Prospective studies are needed to better characterize the benefits and consequences of antibiotic exposure in the peri- and early post-transplant period.

Sarcopenia, the loss of muscle mass, has been identified as a potential risk factor for adverse outcomes in hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) recipients. However, much remains unknown about change in body composition following HCT. We retrospectively evaluated computed tomography (CT) imaging from 315 lymphoma patients undergoing HCT at our institution between 2000 and 2014. Cross-sectional areas of lean muscle, subcutaneous adipose tissue, and visceral adipose tissue were measured on CT at the level of the third lumbar vertebral body before HCT, 1-year post-HCT, and 2.5 years post-HCT. The incidence of sarcopenia before HCT was 47% in the autologous HCT (auto-HCT) cohort (n = 218) and 55% in the allogeneic HCT (allo-HCT) cohort (n = 97). Older age (odds ratio [OR], 1.04; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01 to 1.04; P .001) and male sex (OR, 4.59; 95% CI, 1.42 to 4.93; P .001) were associated with sarcopenia before HCT. Increasing body mass index (OR, .78; 95% CI, .73 to .84; P .001) was protective against sarcopenia before HCT. A significant decline in total lean body mass (β = 1.96; 95% CI, .79 to 3.13; P = .001) and increased sarcopenia incidence (OR, 1.72; 95% CI, 1.13 to 2.62, P = .012) was observed over time for patients in the allo-HCT cohort when compared with the trend in the auto-HCT cohort. Both auto-HCT and allo-HCT recipients experienced an increase in total body fat mass over time (β = 3.75; 95% CI, 2.77 to 4.73; P .001). In multivariate analysis of patients undergoing allo-HCT, the presence of sarcopenia on baseline imaging before HCT was associated with a lower risk of acute graft-versus-host disease (OR, .30; 95% CI, .09 to .98; P = .047). In conclusion, we found that total body fat mass increases after both auto-HCT and allo-HCT. Following allo-HCT, total lean body mass significantly decreases corresponding to increased incidence of sarcopenia. Future studies are needed to further characterize changes in body composition in HCT recipients and investigate its impact on HCT outcomes.

Hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HCT) recipients have a substantial risk of developing secondary solid cancers, particularly beyond 5 years after HCT and without reaching a plateau overtime. A working group was established through the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research and the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation with the goal to facilitate implementation of cancer screening appropriate to HCT recipients. The working group reviewed guidelines and methods for cancer screening applicable to the general population and reviewed the incidence and risk factors for secondary cancers after HCT. A consensus approach was used to establish recommendations for individual secondary cancers. The most common sites include oral cavity, skin, breast and thyroid. Risks of cancers are increased after HCT compared with the general population in skin, thyroid, oral cavity, esophagus, liver, nervous system, bone and connective tissues. Myeloablative TBI, young age at HCT, chronic GVHD and prolonged immunosuppressive treatment beyond 24 months were well-documented risk factors for many types of secondary cancers. All HCT recipients should be advised of the risks of secondary cancers annually and encouraged to undergo recommended screening based on their predisposition. Here we propose guidelines to help clinicians in providing screening and preventive care for secondary cancers among HCT recipients.

Monitoring the kinetics of B-cell recovery following rituximab may guide the management of steroid-refractory chronic GvHD

Background High-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) can offer durable remission in many patients with relapsed or high-risk lymphoma. However, elderly patients are often not considered ASCT candidates based on age alone. Subjects, Materials, and Methods A retrospective analysis of patients ≥70 years of age with a diagnosis of Hodgkin or non-Hodgkin lymphoma receiving ASCT between 2000 and 2016 at two partner institutions was performed. Clinical data were extracted from institutional databases and individual medical records. Multivariate analysis was performed to examine the association of clinical variables with transplant outcomes. Results One hundred seven patients were identified. Median age at transplant was 72 years (range, 70–79). The most common lymphoma subtype was diffuse large B-cell (n = 63, 59%). Median time to neutrophil and platelet engraftment were 10 and 12 days, respectively. With a median follow-up for survivors of 20 months following ASCT (range, 6 months to 13.1 years), estimates for 2-year progression-free survival and overall survival were 58% (95% confidence interval [CI], 48%–67%) and 65% (95% CI, 55%–74%), respectively. Two-year estimate for relapse was 34% (95% CI, 25%–44%) and nonrelapse mortality (NRM) was 7% (95% CI, 3%–14%). Multivariate analysis showed that more recent date of transplant was associated with lower NRM. The Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation-Comorbidity Index score was not predictive of NRM in this data set (high-risk vs. low-risk, hazard ratio 3.45, p = .065). Conclusion Eligibility for ASCT should be an individualized decision, and age should not be an absolute contraindication to ASCT in healthy elderly patients with lymphoma. Implications for Practice Although high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) can offer durable remission in many patients with relapsed or high-risk lymphoma, elderly patients are often not considered candidates due to concern for excess toxicity and mortality. This retrospective study showed favorable transplant outcomes, including survival and toxicity, in a large cohort of lymphoma patients over 70 years of age who underwent ASCT. Eligibility for ASCT should be an individualized decision, and age should not be an absolute contraindication to ASCT in healthy elderly patients with lymphoma.

Introduction Synchronous involvement of the central nervous system (CNS) at the diagnosis of systemic non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) is associated with an increased risk for relapse despite complete remission to initial therapy. High-dose chemotherapy with a CNS-directed conditioning regimen followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) holds promise as a consolidative approach. Patients and Methods We conducted a retrospective analysis of all patients with systemic B-cell NHL and synchronous CNS involvement who received upfront consolidation with high-dose chemotherapy with thiotepa, busulfan, cyclophosphamide, and ASCT while in first complete remission between July 2008 and June 2016 at 2 partner academic institutions. Results Twenty patients were identified through the transplant database. The median age at diagnosis was 53 years (range, 37-65 years). The majority had diffuse large B-cell lymphoma histology (n = 17; 85%). The sites of CNS involvement were parenchymal (n = 12; 60%) and leptomeningeal disease (n = 9; 45%). All patients received systemic and CNS-directed therapy prior to transplant, with the most common approaches being R-CHOP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin, and prednisolone) (n = 13; 65%) and high-dose intravenous methotrexate (n = 16; 80%), respectively. With a median follow up of 4.4 years after ASCT (range, 2 months-8.5 years), the Kaplan-Meier estimates of 4-year progression-free and overall survival were 77% (95% confidence interval, 48%-91%) and 82% (95% confidence interval, 54%-94%), respectively. Conclusion CNS-directed high-dose chemotherapy and ASCT provides durable remission for patients with synchronous aggressive lymphoma and should be strongly considered as consolidative therapy for eligible patients with systemic NHL with CNS involvement in first complete remission.

High-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation (HDC-ASCT) is a therapeutic option for patients with primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL). To the authors' knowledge, data are limited regarding its use among patients in first complete remission (CR1) with the CNS-directed conditioning regimen of thiotepa, busulfan, and cyclophosphamide (TBC).A retrospective analysis of patients with PCNSL in CR1 who underwent transplantation using a TBC-based conditioning regimen at 2 academic institutions was performed.Forty-six consecutive patients who underwent HDC-ASCT while in CR1 were identified. The most common induction regimen was high-dose methotrexate plus temozolomide and rituximab (59%). No patients received whole-brain radiotherapy. A total of 40 patients (87%) received cytarabine before undergoing ASCT as either induction intensification, early consolidation therapy, or mobilization. The median time from diagnosis to transplantation was 6 months (range, 4-15 months). The median age of the patients at the time of transplantation was 59 years (range, 27-69 years). With a median follow-up of 2.7 years after ASCT (range, 6 months-7.5 years), the Kaplan-Meier estimates of 2-year overall survival and progression-free survival were 95% (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 80%-99%) and 92% (95% CI, 77%-97%), respectively. The most common toxicities were severe mucositis (35%) and bacterial infections occurring within 100 days of transplantation (35%). The estimated 2-year nonrecurrence mortality rate was 2.9% (95% CI, 0.2%-13.4%).HDC-ASCT with a CNS-directed conditioning regimen such as TBC should be considered for patients with PCNSL who are in CR1 because this approach is associated with encouraging disease control and survival in this select patient population. Cancer 2017;123:3073-79. © 2017 American Cancer Society.

Umbilical cord blood transplantation (UCBT) is an alternative for patients who need hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT), but lack HLA-matched adult donors. Rabbit anti-thymoglobulin (ATG) has been used in UCBT conditioning to achieve T cell depletion, but ATG-induced immunosuppression is associated with delayed immune reconstitution, increased infectious complications and higher non-relapse mortality. In a clinical trial of reduced intensity double-unit UCBT (dUCBT), we substituted low dose total body irradiation (TBI) for ATG to determine whether dUCBT without ATG would alter kinetics and quality of immune reconstitution. Thirty-one patients with hematopoietic malignancies and a median age of 58 yr were treated with Flu/Mel/TBI, followed by dUCBT and GVHD prophylaxis with tacrolimus and sirolimus. We examined reconstitution of immune cell populations, thymic regeneration by quantifying T cell receptor excision circles (TREC) and serum cytokines (IL-1β, IL-2, IL-4, IL-5, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-12, IFN-γ, TNF-α, IL-12p70, GM-CSF) using the LUNARISTM Human 11-Plex Cytokine Biochip384 from AYOXXA Biosystems. Assessments were done prior to and at 1, 2, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months after dUCBT. Results are based on 28 evaluable patients. The 2-yr overall survival and progression-free survival were 53% and 48%. Median time to neutrophil and platelet engraftment was 25 and 52 days, respectively. Before UCBT, the median values for most leukocyte subsets were below normal limits, except for monocytes. CD3+ cells remained depressed until 2 months post-transplant when gradually began to re-emerge. However, CD4+ and CD8+ subsets had distinct reconstitution kinetics (Figure 1). CD4+ T cells declined at 1 month but gradually increased and exceeded pre-transplant levels by 9 months after UCBT. In contrast, at 9 months, CD8+ lymphocytes remained depressed to 50% of pre-transplant levels, but increased thereafter and reached normal values by 2-yr. NK cells and monocytes reached normal values at 3 months post-UCBT. B cells were mostly undetectable for the first 6 months, followed by a 10-fold increase at 9 months and exceeded the upper normal limit by 2-yr. TREC, which were within normal range before transplant, decreased after UCBT but remained detectable between 1-6 months and recovered to normal levels by 9 months. Among cytokines, only IL-8, IL-6 and TNF-α displayed significant changes. IL-8 and IL-6 peaked at day 100 and 9 months, and subsequently declined. In contrast, TNF-α increased by day 100 and remained elevated thereafter. To evaluate functional immunity, we assessed correlations between viral reactivation and reconstitution of immune cell populations and thymic function. Nineteen patients experienced 24 clinically significant viral reactivations or infections, with 1-year cumulative incidence of 62%, which was comparable to 53% observed in dUCBT cohorts receiving ATG-containing conditioning. Although there was no difference in CMV, EBV, adenovirus and VZV reactivation, there was a significant increase in the incidence of HHV-6 reactivation. HHV-6 viremia was observed in 24 of 28 (86%) patients during the first month after dUCBT. Six of these 24 (25%) patients developed HHV-6-related encephalitis. There was a correlation between development of encephalitis and HHV-6 viral load ≥50.000 copies/ml (p=0.007). Pre-transplant TREC levels ≥1.200 copies/ml negatively correlated with subsequent HHV-6 reactivation (p=0.04), indicating that baseline reserve of thymic function has a significant role in post-transplant immune reconstitution. On days 30, 60 and 100 post-transplant, higher TREC levels correlated with lack of HHV-6 viremia (p Figure 1 Disclosures Defilipp: Incyte: Research Funding. Politikos:Angiocrine Bioscience Inc: Research Funding. Armand:Otsuka: Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; Affimed: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Adaptive: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Merck: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Infinity: Consultancy; Sigma Tau: Research Funding; ADC Therapeutics: Consultancy; Tensha: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy. Ho:Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy. Koreth:Amgen: Consultancy; Equillium: Consultancy; Cugene: Consultancy. Avigan:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Juno: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Partners Tx: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Partner Tx: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Karyopharm: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Consultancy; Parexel: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy. Rosenblatt:Celgene: Research Funding; Amgen: Other: Advisory Board; Merck: Other: Advisory Board; BMS: Other: Advisory Board ; Parexel: Consultancy; Imaging Endpoint: Consultancy; Partner Tx: Other: Advisory Board; Dava Oncology: Other: Education; BMS: Research Funding. Chen:Abbvie: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy; Magenta: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Kiadis: Consultancy. Soiffer:Gilead, Mana therapeutic, Cugene, Jazz: Consultancy; Juno, kiadis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: DSMB; Mana therapeutic: Consultancy; Kiadis: Other: supervisory board; Jazz: Consultancy; Cugene: Consultancy. Cutler:Kadmon: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy; Fate Therapeutics: Consultancy. Ritz:Equillium: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Kite Pharma: Research Funding; Aleta Biotherapeutics: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Avrobio: Consultancy; LifeVault Bio: Consultancy; Draper Labs: Consultancy; Talaris Therapeutics: Consultancy; TScan Therapeutics: Consultancy.

Systemic glucocorticoids are the principal treatment for acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), which remains the major cause of non-relapse mortality (NRM) after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). However, there are no validated biomarkers that measure a patient's response to glucocorticoid therapy, and thus response is evaluated by the change in clinical symptom severity. A major weakness in the predictive power of clinical responses is that changes to all organs are weighted equally even though the major driver of NRM is irreversible damage to the crypts of the GI tract. Recent studies from the Mount Sinai Acute GVHD International Consortium (MAGIC) have validated an algorithm probability (MAP) that combines serum concentrations of two biomarkers of GVHD (REG3α and ST2) to generate an estimated probability of 6 month NRM for individual patients. The MAP has been considered a "liquid biopsy" that estimates the damage caused by GVHD to crypts throughout the lower GI tract (Hartwell et al., JCI Insight, 2017; Major-Monfried et al., Blood, 2018). We hypothesized that the change in MAP between start of treatment and 28 days later could serve as a response biomarker for GVHD and might compare favorably to the change in clinical symptoms that measures response to GVHD treatment, which is widely used as a surrogate for long term survival and is the primary endpoint in most GVHD treatment trials (Martin et al., BBMT, 2009; MacMillan et al., Blood, 2010). We prospectively collected serum samples and clinical staging from 368 sequential HCT patients who received systemic treatment for acute GVHD in one of 20 MAGIC centers between January 2016 and February 2018. We measured the serum concentrations of REG3α and ST2 before and after systemic therapy for acute GVHD and computed MAPs, the changes in MAPs, and clinical responses for each patient. MAPs of patients who experienced 6 month NRM showed significantly greater increases than MAPs of patients who survived (p=0.0004). In patients whose MAPs at the start of treatment were low (Ann Arbor 1, MAP < 0.141) or intermediate (Ann Arbor 2, 0.141 ≤ MAP ≤ 0.290), 6 month NRM clustered among those who had the greatest increases in MAP after 28 days (Fig 1A,B). In patients with high MAPs at the start of treatment (Ann Arbor 3, MAP > 0.290), those who survived tended to have the largest decreases in MAP (Fig 1C). These changes in MAP suggested crossing a single threshold could predict risk of mortality. We found that patients whose MAPs rose above a threshold MAP of 0.290 (5% of Ann Arbor 1, 27% of Ann Arbor 2) had significantly worse survival compared to those who remained below it, whereas the large number patients with initially high MAPs that remained above the threshold (66% of Ann Arbor 3) had a large increases in mortality (Fig 2). When measured at day 28, the MAP was significantly more accurate in predicting NRM than the gold standard of the clinical response, with areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.86 and 0.70, respectively (p We conclude that the MAP is, to our knowledge, the first validated laboratory test to serve as response biomarker for the treatment for acute GVHD and a more accurate predictor of survival than clinical response after four weeks of treatment. The MAP may serve as a novel endpoint and an important complement to changes in clinical symptom severity in future trials of GVHD treatment. Disclosures Srinagesh: National Institutes of Health: Research Funding. Ozbek:Viracor: Patents & Royalties: Biomarker Patent. Ayuk:Novartis: Honoraria, Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding. Aziz:Doris Duke Charitable Foundation: Research Funding. Defilipp:Incyte: Research Funding. Grupp:Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy; GSK: Consultancy; CBMG: Consultancy; Novartis: Research Funding; Kite: Research Funding; Servier: Research Funding; Jazz: Other: study steering committees or scientific advisory boards; Adaptimmune: Other: study steering committees or scientific advisory boards; Cure Genetics: Consultancy; Humanigen: Consultancy. Hexner:novartis: Research Funding. Kitko:Mallinckrodt: Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria. Mielke:EBMT/EHA: Other: Travel support; ISCT: Other: Travel support; Miltenyi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel and speakers fee (via institution), Speakers Bureau; Jazz Pharma: Honoraria, Other: Travel support, Speakers Bureau; IACH: Other: Travel support; Kiadis Pharma: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel support (via institution), Speakers Bureau; DGHO: Other: Travel support; Bellicum: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel (via institution); GILEAD: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel (via institution), Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Honoraria, Other: Travel support (via institution), Speakers Bureau. Merli:Sobi: Consultancy; Amgen: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Bellicum: Consultancy. Pulsipher:Amgen: Other: Lecture; Miltenyi: Research Funding; Bellicum: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Jazz: Other: Education for employees; CSL Behring: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Adaptive: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Medac: Honoraria. Qayed:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria. Reshef:Pfizer: Consultancy; Magenta: Consultancy; Kite: Consultancy, Research Funding; Atara: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Incyte: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Shire: Research Funding. Levine:Incyte: Consultancy, Research Funding; Biogen: Other: non-financial support; Viracor: Patents & Royalties: biomarker patent; Ironwood: Honoraria; bluebird bio: Consultancy; National Cancer Institute: Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria; Kamada: Research Funding. Ferrara:National Institutes of Health: Research Funding; ViraCor: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy; Kamada: Consultancy; Mallinckrodt: Consultancy; Enlivex: Consultancy; Xenikos: Consultancy; CSL Behring: Consultancy.

Post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) based GVHD prevention regimens are an emerging platform in allogeneic transplantation for hematological malignancies and are being prospectively compared to traditional standards. We present a single-center retrospective series of adult allogeneic bone marrow transplantation with the use of post-transplant cyclophosphamide in the setting of benign hematological conditions. Ten patients were treated between 2013 to 2019. Non-myeloablative conditioning consisted of rATG 0.5mg/kg on day (D) -9, 2mg/kg on D-7,-8 (ATG was in one patient with DBA), fludarabine 30mg/m2 daily from D-6 to D-2, cyclophosphamide 14.5mg/kg D-6 and D-5, and 200cGy of total body irradiation D-1. The bone marrow graft was administered on D0. GVHD prophylaxis consisted of post-transplant cyclophosphamide at 50mg/kg/day IV D+3, and +4 mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) at 15 mg/kg 3 times daily (maximum daily dose 3000 mg) starting on D+5 with taper beginning at D+35 to be off around D+100, and tacrolimus on D+5 with a target trough of 5-10 ng/mL with tapering beginning at D+180 with a goal to be off at D+360 in the absence of any GVHD. The median age at the time of transplantation was 42 (range 24-73) and 4 of 10 were female. Diagnoses include severe aplastic anemia (n=6), Diamond-Blackfan Anemia (n=2), paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (n=1), and pure red cell aplasia (n=1). Median Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation-specific Comorbidity Index (HCT-CI) was 0 (range 0-5). Bone marrow donors were haploidentical donors (n=6), fully matched unrelated donors(n=3), and fully matched sibling (n=1). The median donor age was 31 (range 22-53). Donor marrow grafts had a median CD34+ cell count of 4.41 x 106/kg recipient ideal body weight (range 1.12 x 106 to 20.5 x 106). At a median follow-up of 17 months (range 3, 63) after transplantation, all patients are alive, with donor-derived hematopoiesis and free of significant acute or chronic GVHD. Neutrophil and platelet engraftment occurred at a median of 21 (range 16-34) days and 33 (21-65) days, respectively, after transplantation. The patient with pure red cell aplasia developed secondary graft failure and required a second transplant using a peripherally collected graft with the same fully matched unrelated donor. For all recipients, median day +30 unsorted chimerism was 100% (range 71-100%). Patients have not experienced significant acute or chronic GVHD. There were no cases of grade II-IV acute GVHD observed. Chronic GVHD was observed in 3 patients with ocular disease (two mild, one moderate). All patients who are over 12 months after transplantation are off systemic immunosuppression. Three patients experienced CMV reactivation, two required preemptive treatment with oral valganciclovir, while the third had a single positive low level positive CMV PCR that resolved spontaneously. Three patients had low level positive EBV viremia, none of which required pre-emptive treatment. Other significant infectious complications before day +100 included BK cystitis in three patients, influenza, adenovirus cystitis, clostridium difficile colitis, streptococcal and enterococcal polymicrobial endocarditis, and enterococcal bacteremia. Significant non-infectious complications were rare. One patient experienced engraftment syndrome which resolved quickly with systemic steroid administration. Another patient suffered a small spontaneous subdural hemorrhage day +10 after transplantation, but subsequently made a full neurologic recovery. Post-transplant cyclophosphamide based non-myeloablative allogeneic bone marrow transplantation appears safe and effective for patients with non-malignant hematologic conditions and should be prospectively compared to historical regimens. Table 1. Cohort Characteristics. SAA - Severe aplastic anemia, DBA - Diamond Blackfan anemia, ATG- anti-thymocyte globulin, CSA- cyclosporine, Cy-cyclophosphamide, haplo- haploidentical Disclosures Defilipp: Incyte: Research Funding. Frigault:Nkarta: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Foundation Medicine: Consultancy; Xenetic: Consultancy; Juno/Celgene: Consultancy; Kite/Gilead: Honoraria; Incyte: Consultancy. Chen:Incyte: Consultancy; Magenta: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Kiadis: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy.

11607 Background: Melphalan, remains the mainstay of conditioning for autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in multiple myeloma (MM) and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) patients. Gastrointestinal symptoms represent the most significant non-hematologic toxicities following high-dose melphalan conditioning, with approximately 40% of patients experiencing CTCAE grade 2 or higher diarrhea following conditioning regimens containing melphalan. Enterade is a proprietary blend of electrolytes and five amino-acids that can facilitate retention of the absorbing capacity of the small intestine by rebuilding the villi and reduce antigenic translocation by tightening the mucosal barrier. In a study of irradiated mice, enterade improved survival and improved body weight following irradiation. The goal was to investigate the effectiveness of enterade to reduce GI toxicities after high-dose melphalan chemotherapy. Methods: The trial was designed as a Phase 2, multi-center, double-blinded, 2-arm randomized study. 114 MM or NHL patients were enrolled between October 2016 and October 2017. Patients received either two 8oz bottles/day of enterade or placebo starting on the day of admission through Day +14. GI toxicity was scored by the CT-CAE 4.0 system from admission through Day + 14. Compliance was arbitrarily set at consumption of 2 bottles daily for 11+ days. Results: Of the 114 enrolled patients, 99 (61 MM, 38 NHL) attempted to consume at least 1 dose of enterade/placebo. Compliance overall was much lower than anticipated; with no MM patients achieving compliance compared to 34.2% in the NHL group. Compliance in NHL patients was 31.6% in the enterade group versus 36.8% in the placebo group. Analysis of primary endpoint in NHL patients showed a 16% incidence of diarrhea ≥ grade 2 in enterade compliant patients versus 86% in the placebo group (p= 0.02). Conclusions: Eleven days of two 8oz bottles of liquid is a difficult task during ASCT, especially for MM with nausea, altered taste and poor appetite. For those NHL patients, compliant per protocol (who consumed ≥11 days), enterade significantly reduced diarrhea. The use of enterade to prevent diarrhea following high-dose chemotherapy should be explored further in populations capable of reasonable oral intake. Clinical trial information: NCT02919670.

Metabolic syndrome (MetS) is a constellation of cardiovascular risk factors that increases the risk of cardiovascular disease, diabetes mellitus and all cause mortality. Long-term survivors of hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) have a substantial risk of developing MetS and cardiovascular disease, with the estimated prevalence of MetS being 31-49% among HCT recipients. Although MetS has not yet been proven to impact cardiovascular risk after HCT, an understanding of the incidence and risk factors for MetS in HCT recipients can provide the foundation to evaluate screening guidelines and develop interventions that may mitigate cardiovascular-related mortality. A working group was established through the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research and the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation with the goal of reviewing literature and recommend practices appropriate to HCT recipients. Here we deliver consensus recommendations to help clinicians provide screening and preventive care for MetS and cardiovascular disease among HCT recipients. All HCT survivors should be advised of the risks of MetS and encouraged to undergo recommended screening based on their predisposition and ongoing risk factors.

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) offers curative potential to a number of older patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in their first complete remission. However, there are limited data in the literature concerning post-HCT outcomes for older patients in their second complete remission (CR2).The purpose of the current study was to retrospectively investigate within the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research database parameters influencing posttransplant outcomes for patients 60 years of age or older undergoing HCT for AML in CR2.In total, 196 patients from 78 centers were identified; the median age was 64 years (range, 60-78 years). Seventy-one percent had a Karnofsky performance status ≥ 90 at the time of HCT. Reduced-intensity conditioning regimens were used in 159 patients (81%). A univariate analysis demonstrated a 3-year overall survival (OS) rate of 42% (95% confidence interval [CI], 35%-49%), a leukemia-free survival rate of 37% (95% CI, 30%-44%), a cumulative incidence of nonrelapse mortality of 25% (95% CI, 19%-32%), and a cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) of 38% (95% CI, 31%-45%). A multivariate analysis demonstrated that cytogenetic risk was the only independent risk factor for OS (P = .023) with a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.14 (95% CI, 0.59-2.19) for intermediate-risk cytogenetics and an HR of 2.32 (95% CI, 1.05-5.14) for unfavorable-risk cytogenetics. For CIR, cytogenetic risk was also the only independent prognostic factor (P = .01) with an HR of 1.10 (95% CI, 0.47-2.56) for intermediate-risk cytogenetics and an HR of 2.98 (95% CI, 1.11-8.00) for unfavorable-risk cytogenetics.Allogeneic HCT is a curative treatment option for older patients with AML in CR2, particularly for those with favorable or intermediate cytogenetic risk. Cancer 2017;123:2035-2042. © 2017 American Cancer Society.

The development of hematologic malignancy in the presence of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is rare. We present a case of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with del(7q) occurring in a patient with a 4-year history of untreated CLL. Application of flow cytometry and immunohistochemistry allowed for characterization of two distinct coexisting malignant cell populations. After undergoing induction and consolidation chemotherapy, the patient achieved complete remission of AML with the persistence of CLL. Allogeneic transplantation was pursued given his unfavorable cytogenetics. Subsequent matched unrelated donor allogeneic stem cell transplantation resulted in full engraftment and complete remission, with no evidence of AML or CLL. Due to a scarcity of reported cases, insight into treatment and prognosis in cases of concurrent AML and CLL is limited. However, prognosis seems dependent on the chemosensitivity of AML. CLL did not have a detrimental effect on treatment or transplant outcome in our case. This is the first reported case of concomitant de novo AML and CLL to undergo allogeneic transplantation. The patient remained in complete hematologic and cytogenetic remission of both malignancies over a year after transplantation.

The significance of conditioning regimen intensity on the outcomes of T-cell replete HLA-haploidentical transplants is not known. This study compared outcomes of commonly used myeloablative (MAC) to reduced intensity (RIC) conditioning regimens in 1325 such transplants (AML; n=818; ALL; n=286 and MDS; n=221) in the US between 2008 and 2016. The median age of the study population was 54 years (18 - 70). Most patients (80%) with AML and ALL were in first or subsequent remission; 83% of those with MDS had refractory anemia with excess blasts at transplantation. Fifty-one percent of patients with AML and ALL had intermediate disease risk index (DRI). In contrast, 50% of patients with MDS had high or very high DRI. Patients received MAC (n=526; 40%) or RIC (n=799; 60%) transplant conditioning regimens and a uniform graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis: post-transplant cyclophosphamide, calcineurin inhibitor and mycophenolate. Approximately 50% of patients reported a HCT-CI score of 0-2 in MAC and RIC groups. Sixty-six percent of MAC and 42% of RIC recipients received peripheral blood grafts. Total body irradiation (TBI) + fludarabine (TBI/Flu; 33%) and busulfan with cyclophosphamide with/without Flu (Bu/Cy ± Flu; 36%) were the predominant MAC regimens. Other MAC regimens included TBI/Cy or other agents (10%), Flu/Bu4 (13%), melphalan (140 mg/m2) + Flu ± thiotepa (Flu/Mel ± TT; 9%). TBI (200cGy)/Cy/Flu (84%) was the predominant RIC regimen. Other RIC regimens included TBI 200cGy + Bu or Mel + Flu (7%), Flu/Bu2 (1%) and Flu/Mel (100mg/m2) ± TT (5mg/kg) (8%). The primary endpoint was disease-free survival (relapse or death). Cox regression models were built to study the effect of conditioning regimens on transplant outcomes after adjusting for other factors significantly associated with outcomes. Differences in transplant-outcomes were observed between ages 18-54 years and 55-70 years. The effect of age was further tested within the 18-54 and 55-70 age groups and there were no differences in outcome. In patients aged 18-54 years (n=689), 55% received MAC and 54% received RIC regimens. In patients aged 55-70 years (n=636), 22% received MAC and 78% received RIC regimens. Table 1 shows the effect (hazard ratio; HR) of conditioning regimen intensity in the two age groups adjusted for HCT-CI, recipient CMV serostatus, disease, DRI and graft type and the 2-year probabilities for the outcomes of interest. In patients aged 18-54 years who were equally likely to receive MAC or RIC regimens, relapse risks were higher after RIC regimens that resulted in lower disease-free survival. There were no differences in non-relapse mortality (NRM) or overall survival by conditioning regimen intensity. In patients aged 55-70 years who were more likely to receive RIC regimen, NRM was lower after RIC but without an advantage for relapse, disease-free or overall survival. Figure 1A and 1B show the 2-year probability of disease-free survival by conditioning regimen intensity in patients aged 18-54 and 55-70 years, respectively. Consistent with the main analysis, a subset analysis limited to AML also confirmed higher relapse (HR 1.43, p=0.03) and lower disease-free survival (HR 1.38, p=0.02) after RIC regimens in patients aged 18-54 years but not in patients aged 55-70 years. Acute GVHD (HR 1.01, p=0.94) and chronic GVHD (HR 0.82, p=0.14) did not differ by conditioning regimen intensity. Table 2 compares the effect of TBI- and non-TBI containing MAC and RIC regimens adjusted for age, HCT-CI, recipient CMV serostatus, disease, DRI and graft type. NRM risks were higher after RIC non-TBI compared to RIC TBI regimens. The predominant RIC non-TBI regimen was Flu/Mel (100mg/m2) ± TT (5mg/kg). In conclusion, a MAC regimen offers higher disease-free survival for those aged 18-54 years and can tolerate MAC regimens. For patients who are unable to tolerate MAC regimens, regardless of their age, TBI200 cGy/Cy/Flu is preferred to Flu/Mel ± TT to minimize NRM risks. Disclosures Shah: Juno Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria; Lentigen Technology: Research Funding; Exelexis: Equity Ownership; Geron: Equity Ownership; Miltenyi: Other: Travel funding, Research Funding; Oncosec: Equity Ownership. Brunstein:Gamidacell: Research Funding. Champlin:Otsuka: Research Funding; Sanofi: Research Funding. Hamadani:Celgene Corporation: Consultancy; Merck: Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy; ADC Therapeutics: Research Funding; Sanofi Genzyme: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Cellerant: Consultancy; Takeda: Research Funding; Ostuka: Research Funding; MedImmune: Consultancy, Research Funding. McGuirk:Gamida Cell: Research Funding; Kite Pharma: Honoraria, Other: travel accommodations, expenses, speaker ; Fresenius Biotech: Research Funding; Pluristem Ltd: Research Funding; Bellicum Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Astellas Pharma: Research Funding; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Honoraria, Other: speaker, Research Funding. Vasu:Boehringer Ingelheim Inc: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Waller:Pharmacyclics: Other: Travel Expenses, EHA, Research Funding; Cambium Medical Technologies: Consultancy, Equity Ownership; Celldex: Research Funding; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Kalytera: Consultancy.

Recent investigations have found a higher incidence of adverse events associated with hematopoietic cell donation in related donors (RDs) who have morbidities that if present in an unrelated donor (UD) would preclude donation. In the UD setting, regulatory standards ensure independent assessment of donors, one of several crucial measures to safeguard donor health and safety. A survey conducted by the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR) Donor Health and Safety Working Committee in 2007 reported a potential conflict of interest in >70% of US centers, where physicians had simultaneous responsibility for RDs and their recipients. Consequently, several international organizations have endeavored to improve practice through regulations and consensus recommendations. We hypothesized that the changes in the 2012 Foundation for the Accreditation of Cellular Therapy and the Joint Accreditation Committee-International Society for Cellular Therapy and European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation standards resulting from the CIBMTR study would have significantly impacted practice. Accordingly, we conducted a follow-up survey of US transplantation centers to assess practice changes since 2007, and to investigate additional areas where RD care was predicted to differ from UD care. A total of 73 centers (53%), performing 79% of RD transplantations in the United States, responded. Significant improvements were observed since the earlier survey; 62% centers now ensure separation of RD and recipient care (P