Search

Therapy adherence can significantly influence the outcome of cancer patients. The prospective, non-interventional CARO study (NCT02970747) investigated adherence, effectiveness, and safety of carfilzomib in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) in the German real-world setting. In total, 359 patients were included at 69 sites. Data on carfilzomib combination regimens were evaluated for three treatment cohorts: carfilzomib with lenalidomide and dexamethasone (KRd), with dexamethasone only (Kd) or with daratumumab and dexamethasone (KdD). Encouragingly, patients maintained levels of treatment adherence ≥95% to carfilzomib across cohorts. The effectiveness outcomes of CARO were in line with previous data. Median PFS (95% CI) was 17.5 months (14.5, 24.7 [KRd]), 13.4 months (7.0, 18.1 [Kd]), and 15.6 months (9.9, NA [KdD]), respectively. Median OS was 38.9 months (31.5, 53.9 [KRd]), 24.2 months (17.3, 36.8 [Kd]), and not reached (KdD). Overall, the CARO study impressively demonstrates efficacy and safety of KRd, Kd, and KdD regimen in real-world.

Previously, addition of isatuximab (Isa) to standard-of-care lenalidomide-bortezomib-dexamethasone (RVd) in transplant-eligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma in the GMMG-HD7 trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03617731) resulted in a significant increase of minimal residual disease negativity (MRD-) rates after induction therapy. A total of 662 patients were randomly assigned to receive induction therapy with Isa-RVd (n = 331) or RVd (n = 329), followed by single or tandem autologous stem-cell transplant and second random assignment to maintenance with lenalidomide alone or Isa-lenalidomide. We report updated results for part 1 from first random assignment to post-transplant. As of January 31, 2024, MRD- rates continued to deepen after transplant (66% Isa-RVd v 48% RVd). Isa-RVd induction therapy significantly prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) compared with RVd regardless of maintenance therapy (hazard ratio, 0.70 [95% CI, 0.52 to 0.95]; P = .0184). Weighted risk set estimator analysis accounting for second random assignment followed by maintenance with only lenalidomide confirmed a statistically significant benefit for Isa-RVd followed by lenalidomide maintenance versus RVd followed by lenalidomide maintenance (stratified weighted log-rank test P = .016). In conclusion, after 18-week induction therapy followed by transplant without consolidation therapy, adding Isa to RVd resulted in a significant PFS benefit, regardless of maintenance strategy.

Based on the lack of differences in progression-free and overall survival after a median follow-up of 93 months in our HOVON-65/GMMG-HD4 trial (German part; n = 395) randomizing VAD induction (vincristin/adriamycin/dexamthasone)/tandem-transplantation/thalidomide-maintenance vs. PAD induction (bortezomib/adriamycin/dexamethasone)/tandem transplantation/bortezomib maintenance, we discern how chromosomal aberrations determine long-term prognosis by different patterns of association with proliferation and treatment-dependent response, whether responses achieved by different regimens are equal regarding prognosis, and whether subpopulations of patients could be defined as treatable without upfront "novel agents" in cases of limited resources, e.g., in low- or middle-income countries. Serum parameters and risk factors were assessed in 395 patients. CD138-purified plasma cells were subjected to fluorescence in situ hybridization ( n = 354) and gene expression profiling ( n = 204). We found chromosomal aberrations to be associated in four patterns with survival, proliferation, and response: deletion (del) del17p13, del8p21, del13q14, (gain) 1q21+, and translocation t(4;14) (all adverse) associate with higher proliferation. Of these, del17p is associated with an adverse response (pattern 1), and 1q21+, t(4;14), and del13q14 with a treatment-dependent better response (pattern 2). Hyperdiploidy associates with lower proliferation without impacting response or survival (pattern 3). Translocation t(11;14) has no association with survival but a treatment-dependent adverse response (pattern 4). Significantly fewer patients reach a near-complete response or better with "conventional" (VAD) vs. bortezomib-based treatment after induction or high-dose melphalan. These patients, however, show significantly better median progression-free and overall survival. Molecularly, patients responding to the two regimens differ in gene expression, indicating distinct biological properties of the responding myeloma cells. Patients with normal renal function (89.4%), low cytogenetic risk (72.5%), or low proliferation rate (37.9%) neither benefit in progression-free nor overall survival from bortezomib-based upfront treatment. We conclude that response level, the treatment by which it is achieved, and molecular background determine long-term prognosis. Chromosomal aberrations are associated in four patterns with proliferation and treatment-dependent responses. Associations with faster and deeper responses can be deceptive in the case of prognostically adverse aberrations 1q21+ and t(4;14). Far from advocating a return to "outdated" treatments, if resources do not permit state-of-the-art-treatment, normal renal function and/or molecular profiling identifies patient subpopulations doing well without upfront "novel agents".

In the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, there has been a scarcity of resources with various effects on the care of cancer patients. This paper provides an English summary of a German guideline on prioritization and resource allocation for colorectal and pancreatic cancer in the context of the pandemic. Based on a selective literature review as well as empirical and ethical analyses, the research team of the CancerCOVID Consortium drafted recommendations for prioritizing diagnostic and treatment measures for both entities. The final version of the guideline received consent from the executive boards of nine societies of the Association of Scientific Medical Societies in Germany (AWMF), 20 further professional organizations and 22 other experts from various disciplines as well as patient representatives. The guiding principle for the prioritization of decisions is the minimization of harm. Prioritization decisions to fulfill this overall goal should be guided by (1) the urgency relevant to avoid or reduce harm, (2) the likelihood of success of the diagnostic or therapeutic measure advised, and (3) the availability of alternative treatment options. In the event of a relevant risk of harm as a result of prioritization, these decisions should be made by means of a team approach. Gender, age, disability, ethnicity, origin, and other social characteristics, such as social or insurance status, as well as the vehemence of a patient's treatment request and SARS-CoV-2 vaccination status should not be used as prioritization criteria. The guideline provides concrete recommendations for (1) diagnostic procedures, (2) surgical procedures for cancer, and (3) systemic treatment and radiotherapy in patients with colorectal or pancreatic cancer within the context of the German healthcare system., (© 2024 S. Karger AG, Basel.)

Introduction: Survival data reported by randomised controlled trials are collected in a highly selected patient population and can thus only be transferred to a limited extent to real-world patients: the patients in routine care are mostly older, present with more comorbidities and a worse general state of health. This so-called efficacy-effectiveness gap typically results in inferior survival data in routine healthcare., Methods: Six prospective clinical tumour registries recruited a total of 11,679 patients receiving systemic therapy in haemato-oncological practices in Germany between 2006 and 2020. For these patients with advanced colorectal cancer, breast cancer, lung cancer, pancreatic cancer, renal cell cancer, and lymphatic neoplasms, overall survival was analysed. A comprehensive literature search was performed to identify suitable pivotal randomised controlled trials., Results: Median overall survival of patients treated in German routine care, with advanced colorectal, breast, lung, and pancreatic cancer, as well as with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and multiple myeloma, is not shorter than the respective survival data reported in trials. Patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma, chronic lymphocytic leukaemia, or indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma showed slightly lower survival rates compared to clinical trials., Conclusions: Despite less favourable patient characteristics, survival data from patients with cancer treated in ambulatory routine care in Germany are in range with results from randomised controlled studies., (© 2024 The Author(s). Published by S. Karger AG, Basel.)

The rituximab biosimilar CT-P10 is approved for the treatment of non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Previous studies have demonstrated clinical similarity between CT-P10 and reference rituximab. However, real-world data relating to treatment in patients with DLBCL with rituximab biosimilars are limited. This study collected real-world data relating to the effectiveness and safety of CT-P10 treatment from the medical records of 389 patients with DLBCL (24 centers, five European countries). For the primary outcome (clinical effectiveness), overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and best response (BR) were assessed. The percentage (95% confidence interval [95% CI]) of patients alive at 12-, 18-, and 30 months postindex (initiation of CT-P10) was 86% (82.4%-89.4%), 81% (76.9%-84.9%), and 76% (71.2%-80.1%), respectively. The PFS rate (percent, [95% CI]) at 12-, 18-, and 30 months postindex was 78% (74.2%-82.5%), 72% (67.9%-76.9%), and 67% (61.9%-71.7%), respectively. Median OS/PFS was not reached. For 82% ( n = 312) of patients, the BR to CT-P10 was a complete response. Adverse events were consistent with known effects of chemotherapy. This international, multicenter study provides real-world data on the safety and effectiveness profile of CT-P10 for DLBCL treatment and supports the adoption of CT-P10 for the treatment of DLBCL., Competing Interests: MB has received research funding from Takeda, Gilead, Roche, Abbvie; Travel/acc/expenses = Roche, Takeda, Gilead, Celltrion, Honararia Tevapharma, Roche, Celltrion; Advisory board = Beigene; Trial Management Group = Roche. GS has received in the last 12 months financial compensations for participating in advisory boards or consulting from: Abbvie, Bayer, Beigene, BMS/Celgene, Epizyme, Genentech/Roche, Genmab, Incyte, Janssen, Kite/Gilead, Loxo, Milteniy, Morphosys, Novartis, Rapt, Regeneron and Takeda. Shareholder: Owkin. PLZ has received personal fees for consulting from Verastem, EUSA Pharma, MSD and Novartis; personal fees for participating in a speaker's bureau from Verastem, Celltrion, Gilead, Janssen‐Cilag, BMS, Servier, MSG, TG Therapeutics, Takeda, Roche, EUSA Pharma, Kyowa Kirin, Novartis, Incyte and Beigene; and personal fees for participating in advisory boards from Verastem, Celltrion, Gilead, Janssen‐Cilag, BMS, Servier, Sandoz, MSG, TG Therapeutics, Takeda, Roche, EUSA Pharma, Kyowa Kirin, Novartis, ADC Therapeutics, Incyte and Beigene. SM has received educational grants to attend educational meetings, educational lecturing and attendance of pharmaceutical advisory boards for Novartis, Abbvie and AstraZeneca in the last year. KL has received research grants from Celltrion. Outside this work, KL has received research grants from AbbVie, Novartis, Takeda, Roche, Amgen, and Sandoz as well as personal fees from AbbVie, Novartis, Sandoz, Celgene, Jansen, and Amgen. SKK and YNL are employees of Celltrion Healthcare. CG, WK, MBo, DT, BS, JH, AB, JJB, and MW have no conflict of interest to disclose., (© 2022 The Authors. eJHaem published by British Society for Haematology and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background: Anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies have consistently shown increased efficacy when added to standard of care for patients with multiple myeloma. We aimed to assess the efficacy of isatuximab in addition to lenalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone in patients with newly diagnosed transplantation-eligible multiple myeloma., Methods: This open-label, multicentre, randomised, active-controlled, phase 3 trial was done at 67 academic and oncology practice centres in Germany. This study is ongoing and divided into two parts; herein, we report results from part 1. Eligible patients were aged 18-70 years; had a confirmed diagnosis of untreated multiple myeloma requiring systemic treatment and a WHO performance status of 0-2; and were eligible for induction therapy, high-dose melphalan and autologous haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation, and maintenance treatment. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive three 42-day cycles of induction therapy either with isatuximab plus lenalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (isatuximab group) or lenalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone alone (control group) using a web-based system and permuted blocks. Patients in both groups received lenalidomide (25 mg orally on days 1-14 and 22-35), bortezomib (1·3 mg/m 2 subcutaneously on days 1, 4, 8, 11, 22, 25, 29, and 32), and dexamethasone (20 mg orally on days 1-2, 4-5, 8-9, 11-12, 15, 22-23, 25-26, 29-30, and 32-33). Isatuximab was given as 10 mg/kg intravenously on days 1, 8, 15, 22, and 29 of cycle 1 and on days 1, 15, and 29 of cycles 2 and 3. The primary endpoint was minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity assessed by flow cytometry, in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03617731., Findings: Between Oct 23, 2018, and Sep 22, 2020, 660 patients were included in the ITT analysis (331 in the isatuximab group and 329 in the control group). 654 (99%) patients were White, two were African, one was Arabic, and three were Asian. 250 (38%) were women and 410 (62%) were men. The median age was 59 years (IQR 54-64). MRD negativity after induction therapy was reached in 166 (50%) patients in the isatuximab group versus 117 (36%) in the control group (OR 1·82 [95% CI 1·33-2·48]; p=0·00017). Median follow-up time from start to end of induction therapy was 125 days (IQR 125-131) versus 125 days (125-132). At least one grade 3 or 4 adverse event occurred in 208 (63%) of 330 patients versus 199 (61%) of 328 patients. Neutropenia of grade 3 or 4 occurred in 77 (23%) versus 23 (7%) patients and infections of grade 3 or 4 occurred in 40 (12%) versus 32 (10%) patients. Among 12 deaths during induction therapy, one death due to septic shock in the isatuximab group and four deaths (one cardiac decompensation, one hepatic and renal failure, one cardiac arrest, and one drug-induced enteritis) in the control group were considered treatment-related., Interpretation: Addition of isatuximab to lenalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone for induction therapy improved rates of MRD negativity with no new safety signals in patients with newly diagnosed transplantation-eligible multiple myeloma., Funding: Sanofi and Bristol Myers Squibb (Celgene)., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests HG reports financial and trial medication support for this GMMG-HD7 trial from Bristol Myers Squibb and Sanofi; consulting from Adaptive Biotechnology, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, and Janssen; honoraria from Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Chugai, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, and Novartis; research funding from Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Chugai, Incyte, Janssen, Molecular Partner, MSD, Mundipharma, and Novartis; grants from Amgen, Celgene, Chugai, Janssen, and Johns Hopkins University. EKM reports consulting or advisory role, honoraria, research funding, travel accommodation, and expenses from Bristol Myers Squibb (Celgene), GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen-Cilag, Sanofi, Stemline, and Takeda. RF reports consulting or advisory role, honoraria, travel accommodation, and expenses from Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb (Celgene), GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, and Takeda. BB reports honoraria from Amgen, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Sanofi, and Takeda; and travel accommodation, and expanses from Janssen. JD reports honoraria from Celgene, Janssen, and Roche; advisory role, travel accommodation, and expenses from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Abbvie, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Janssen, and Takeda; and speakers bureau from Celgene and Janssen. RS reports consulting for Bristol Myers Squibb, Gilead (Kite), Janssen, and Novartis; and honoraria from Bristol Myers Squibb, Gilead (Kite), Janssen, Roche, and Sanofi. IvM reports consulting for Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Pfizer, Sanofi, and Takeda; honoraria from Sanofi; and travel accommodation and expenses from Takeda. MHa reports consulting for Amgen, Bayer Vital, Celgene, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, and Takeda; and honoraria from Novartis. CM reports consulting for Celgene. AMA reports honoraria from Bristol Myers Squibb (Celgene), GlaxoSmithKline, and Pfizer. BH reports consulting for Sanofi-Aventis. NW reports an advisory role for Glaxo Smith Kline; and research Funding from Bristol Myers Squibb. KK reports honoraria from Sanofi. TAWH reports a consulting or advisory role for Celgene, Gilead Sciences, GlaxoSmithKline, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Novartis, and Sanofi; speakers bureau for Amgen and MSD; and travel accommodation and expenses from AbbVie, Daiichi Sankyo, Eurocept Pharmaceuticals, Janssen, Medac, and Therakos. KT-G reports consulting, an advisory role, honoraria, travel accommodation, and expenses from GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, and Takeda. DG reports consulting and honoraria from Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, and Takeda. MK-H reports honoraria from Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Janssen-Cilag, Roche, and Takeda; and an advisory role for Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Janssen, and Sanofi. CK reports honoraria from AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Pfizer, Sanofi, and Takeda; and research funding from AstraZeneca and Sanofi. WK reports consulting for AstraZeneca, BeiGene, and Janssen; honoraria from AbbVie, Amgen, AstraZeneca, BeiGene, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Janssen, and Sanofi. CS reports honoraria from AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Glaxo Smith Kline, Janssen, Pfizer, Oncopeptides, Sanofi, and Takeda; travel accommodation and expanses from Bristol Myers Squibb, Janssen, Novartis, and Takeda; and research funding from Janssen, Novartis, and Takeda. MMun reports consulting for AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, Glaxo Smith Kline, Janssen, Sanofi, and Takeda; honoraria from Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Janssen, and Takeda; research funding from Incyte; and travel accommodation and expenses from Amgen. MHo reports consulting for Sanofi-Aventis. MSR reports consulting or an advisory role for AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Novartis, Roche, and Sanofi; honoraria from AbbVie and GlaxoSmithKline; and research funding from Novartis and Sanofi. HJS reports honoraria and an advisory role from AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb (Celgene), Chugai, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen-Cilag, Oncopeptides, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, Sebia, TAD Pharma, and Takeda; travel accommodation and expenses from Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb (Celgene), GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen-Cilag, and Sanofi. KCW reports consulting for AbbVie, Adaptive Biotech, Amgen, AstraZeneca, BeiGene, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Karyopharm, Novartis, Oncopeptides, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, Stemline, and Takeda; honoraria from AbbVie, Adaptive Biotech, Amgen, AstraZeneca, BeiGene, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Karyopharm, Novartis, Oncopeptides, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, Stemline, and Takeda; research funding from Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Glaxo Smith Kline, Janssen, and Sanofi; travel accommodation and expenses from AbbVie, Adaptive Biotech, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Janssen, Glaxo Smith Kline, Karyopharm, Oncopeptides, Roche, Sanofi, Stemline, and Takeda. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: In pivotal studies, idelalisib demonstrated remarkable efficacy and manageable tolerability in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and follicular lymphoma (FL). This prospective, multicenter, non-interventional post-authorization study assessed the characteristics, clinical management, and outcome of CLL and FL patients receiving idelalisib in routine clinical practice in Germany., Patients: Observational study in CLL and FL patients treated with idelalisib between September 2015 and December 2020., Results: A total of 147 patients with CLL and FL were included with a median age of 75 and 71 years, respectively. More than 80% of patients presented with comorbidity and many CLL patients with documented high-risk genetic features, including del(17p)/TP53 mutation or unmutated IGHV. The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were not reached in the CLL cohort irrespective of del(17p)/TP53 or unmutated IGHV. The estimated 6-month PFS and OS rates in CLL were 82% and 92%. The estimated 6-month PFS and OS rates for FL were 32.2% and 77.2%. Overall response rates in the CLL and FL cohorts were 70.4% and 36.4%, with the presence of high-risk genetics having no negative impact. No unexpected adverse events were observed. Most frequently reported adverse drug reactions (ADRs) were diarrhea, nausea, pneumonia, rash, and fatigue., Conclusion: This real-world study shows that idelalisib is an effective therapy for CLL and FL, regardless of age and high-risk genetic features, consistent with results from previous clinical trials. Collected safety data and the pattern of ADRs reflect those from previous studies., (Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: Prognosis of patients with multiple myeloma (MM) who have relapsed on or become refractory to immunomodulators and bortezomib is poor, and treatment options are limited. While pomalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone (POM/DEX) has demonstrated efficacy in clinical trials, real-world evidence is scarce., Patients and Methods: POSEIDON was a prospective non-interventional study designed to evaluate effectiveness, safety and quality of life (QoL) of POM/DEX in patients with relapsed or refractory MM (R/RMM) pretreated with at least two prior therapy lines including both lenalidomide and bortezomib in real world in Germany. Patients received POM/DEX according to physicians' choice. Data were analyzed descriptively., Results: Between 2014 and 2017, 151 patients were enrolled, 144 patients with a median of three prior therapy lines qualified for effectiveness analysis. Median age was 73.2 years. Median progression-free and overall survival were 6.3 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 5.2, 8.6] and 12.9 months [95% CI 10.6, 15.1]. Most frequent grade 3/4 adverse events were leukopenia (8.2%), pneumonia (7.5%) and anemia (5.5%). QoL was maintained after start of POM/DEX., Conclusion: The results of POSEIDON support the effectiveness and safety of POM/DEX in R/RMM patients pretreated with lenalidomide and bortezomib and highlight the clinical value of the POM/DEX regimen in the real-world setting. Registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02075996)., (© 2021 The Authors. European Journal of Haematology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Owing to its heterogeneity and rarity, management of disseminated marginal zone B-cell lymphoma (MZL) remains largely understudied. We present prospective data on choice of systemic treatment and survival of patients with MZL treated in German routine practice. Of 175 patients with MZL who had been documented in the prospective clinical cohort study Tumour Registry Lymphatic Neoplasms (NCT00889798) collecting data on systemic treatment, 58 were classified as extranodal MZL of mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) and 117 as non-MALT MZL. We analyzed the most commonly used first-line and second-line chemo(immuno)therapies between 2009 and 2016 and examined objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and prognostic factors for survival. Compared to patients with MALT MZL, those with non-MALT MZL more often presented with bone marrow involvement (43% vs. 14%), Ann Arbor stage III/IV (72% vs. 57%) and were slightly less often in good general condition (ECOG = 0; 41% vs. 47%). In German routine practice, rituximab-bendamustine for a median of 6 cycles was the most frequently used first-line (76%) and second-line treatment (36%), with no major differences between MZL subtypes. The ORR for patients encompassing any positive response was 81%. For patients with MALT and non-MALT MZL, respectively, 5-years PFS was 69% (95% CI 52%-81%) and 66% (95% CI 56%-75%), 5-years OS 79% (95% CI 65%-89%) and 75% (95% CI 66%-83%). Cox proportional hazards models showed a significantly increased risk of mortality for higher age in all patient groups. Our prospective real world data give valuable insights into the management and outcome of non-selected patients with MZL requiring systemic treatment and can help optimize therapy recommendations., (© 2021 The Authors. Hematological Oncology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Objectives: The treatment paradigm in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) is evolving toward individualized, risk-directed, and longer duration of therapy (DOT). The objective of this study was to describe treatment patterns and outcomes in non-transplant NDMM in four European countries., Methods: This retrospective chart review included adults with NDMM diagnosed between January 1, 2012, and December 31, 2013 (early cohort), or April 1, 2016, and March 31, 2017 (recent cohort)., Results: Among 836 patients, molecular testing was performed in 21% and 35% patients of early vs recent cohorts; proteasome inhibitor (PI)/alkylator combinations were the principal first-line (1 L) therapy (39% vs 43%). Use of immunomodulatory drug (IMID)/alkylator combinations declined from early to recent cohort (26% vs 13%) but IMID (7% vs 16%) use increased. Few patients (5%) received 1 L maintenance therapy. Two-thirds of patients were treated with a fixed duration intent, with a median 7-month 1 L DOT and progression-free survival (PFS) of 32.8 months in the early cohort. Both 1 L DOT and PFS were longer with oral compared to injectable regimens., Conclusions: Although frontline treatment patterns changed significantly, 1 L DOT is short. The uptake of molecular testing and 1 L maintenance is low. These results highlight areas of unmet need in NDMM., (© 2020 The Authors. European Journal of Haematology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Waldenström's macroglobulinaemia (WM) is a rare indolent B-cell lymphoma for which only little prospective phase III evidence exists. Thus, real world data are important to provide insight into treatment and survival. We present here data on choice and outcome of systemic treatment of patients with WM treated in German routine practice. In total, 139 patients with WM who had been documented in the prospective clinical cohort study Tumour Registry Lymphatic Neoplasms (NCT00889798) were included into this analysis. We analysed the most frequently used first-line and second-line treatments between 2009 and 2017 and examined best response, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Bendamustine plus rituximab, with a median of six cycles, was by far the most frequently used first-line treatment (81%). Second-line treatment was more heterogenous and mainly based on bendamustine, cyclophosphamide/doxorubicin/vincristine/prednisone (CHOP), fludarabine or ibrutinib, the latter approved in 2014. Three-year PFS from start of first-line treatment was 83% (95% confidence interval [CI] 74%-88%), 3-year OS was 87% (95% CI 80%-92%). These prospective data give valuable insights into the management and outcome of non-selected patients with WM treated in German routine practice. In the lack of prospective phase III clinical trials, real world data can help bridging the gap of evidence., (© 2020 The Authors. Hematological Oncology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Objectives: The German-speaking Myeloma Multicenter Group (GMMG) conducted this trial to investigate efficacy and safety of the three-drug combination bendamustine/prednisone/bortezomib (BPV) as first-line therapy for elderly patients with multiple myeloma (MM)., Methods: Elderly MM patients requiring first-line therapy and not eligible for intensive treatment were enrolled in this phase IIb multicenter study. Patients were treated with BPV regimen for a maximum of nine cycles., Results: Forty-six patients were included in the trial with a median age of 76 years. Nineteen patients had renal impairment at baseline. The ORR was 78.8% for patients treated with 3 and more BPV cycles and 71.1% for all evaluable patients. The median progression-free survival was 25 months, and overall survival at 24 months was 83.3%. The clinical benefit rate including MR was 91.2%. In patients with renal impairment at baseline, a renal response was observed in 11 pts. with complete recovery of the renal function in six patients. The most frequent CTC grade 3/4 AEs experienced by patients were hematological (17.5%) and infectious (9.8%) complications. No new safety signals were observed for the study drugs under investigation., Conclusions: Bendamustine/prednisone/bortezomib may serve as a first-line regimen for transplant-ineligible elderly MM patients in particular for patients with renal impairment requiring a fast and durable renal response., (© 2020 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

GREEN (NCT01905943) is a nonrandomized, open-label, single-arm, phase 3b study investigating the safety and efficacy of obinutuzumab alone or in combination with chemotherapy in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). We report the preplanned subgroup analysis of 140 previously untreated, fit CLL patients who received obinutuzumab plus fludarabine and cyclophosphamide (G-FC). The primary endpoint was safety and tolerability. Efficacy was the secondary endpoint. Obinutuzumab 1000 mg was administered intravenously on Day (D)1 (dose split D1‒2), D8 and D15 of Cycle (C)1, and D1 of C2-6 (28-day cycles). Standard intravenous/oral doses of fludarabine and cyclophosphamide were administered on D1-3 of C1-6. Overall, 87.1% of patients experienced grade ≥ 3 adverse events (AEs), including neutropenia (67.1%) and thrombocytopenia (17.1%). Serious AEs were experienced by 42.1% of patients. Rates of grade ≥ 3 infusion-related reactions and infections were 19.3% and 15.7%, respectively. Overall response rate was observed in 90.0%, with 46.4% of patients achieving complete response (CR; including CR with incomplete marrow recovery). Minimal residual disease negativity rates were 64.3% in peripheral blood and 35.7% in bone marrow (intent-to-treat analysis). After a median observation time of 25.6 months, 2 year progression-free survival was 91%. Frontline G-FC represents a promising treatment option for fit patients with CLL.

Background: 5-Fluorouracil (FU) is one of the most commonly used cytostatic drugs in the systemic treatment of cancer. Treatment with FU may cause severe or life-threatening side effects and the treatment-related mortality rate is 0.2-1.0%., Summary: Among other risk factors associated with increased toxicity, a genetic deficiency in dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD), an enzyme responsible for the metabolism of FU, is well known. This is due to variants in the DPD gene (DPYD). Up to 9% of European patients carry a DPD gene variant that decreases enzyme activity, and DPD is completely lacking in approximately 0.5% of patients. Here we describe the clinical and genetic background and summarize recommendations for the genetic testing and tailoring of treatment with 5-FU derivatives. The statement was developed as a consensus statement organized by the German Society for Hematology and Medical Oncology in cooperation with 13 medical associations from Austria, Germany, and Switzerland. Key Messages: (i) Patients should be tested for the 4 most common genetic DPYD variants before treatment with drugs containing FU. (ii) Testing forms the basis for a differentiated, risk-adapted algorithm with recommendations for treatment with FU-containing drugs. (iii) Testing may optionally be supplemented by therapeutic drug monitoring., (© 2020 S. Karger AG, Basel.)

Objectives: R-CHOP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone) is the standard therapy for patients with previously untreated diffuse large B-cell lymphomas (DLBCL). Dose-dense two-weekly 'R-CHOP-14' was not superior over three-weekly 'R-CHOP-21' in randomised clinical trials (RCTs). We present real-world data on effectiveness of R-CHOP-14 and R-CHOP-21 in patients with DLBCL treated in German routine practice., Methods: We identified 582 patients with DLBCL treated with R-CHOP-14 or R-CHOP-21 in 92 sites from the prospective clinical cohort study Tumour Registry Lymphatic Neoplasms. Patients' schedules were classified by (a) length of the initial first cycle and (b) length of cycles 1-4., Results: About 55% of patients received R-CHOP-21, 45% R-CHOP-14, in median 6 cycles. 51% and 55% of patients, respectively, were able to continue their initial R-CHOP-14 and R-CHOP-21 schedule. While most characteristics between the patient cohorts were similar, patients receiving R-CHOP-21 presented slightly more often with tumour stage I and lower IPI risk. 3-year overall survival of patients with R-CHOP-14 and R-CHOP-21 did not differ: 84% vs 84% (first cycle), 87% vs 89% (cycles 1-4)., Conclusions: Patients with DLBCL in Germany are slightly more likely to receive R-CHOP-21 than R-CHOP-14. Both schedules are similarly effective in routine practice confirming the results from RCTs., (© 2019 The Authors. European Journal of Haematology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Despite increasing treatment options, multiple myeloma (MM) remains incurable for most patients. Data on improvement of outcomes are derived from selected patient populations enrolled in clinical trials and might not be conferrable to all patients. Therefore, we assessed the trial eligibility, sequential treatment, and survival of non-transplant patients with MM treated in German routine care. The prospective clinical cohort study TLN (Tumour Registry Lymphatic Neoplasms) recruited 285 non-transplant patients with symptomatic MM at start of first-line treatment in 84 centres from 2009 to 2011. Demographic and clinical data were collected until August 2016. Trial-ineligibility was determined by presence of at least one of the common exclusion criteria: heart/renal failure, liver/renal diseases, polyneuropathy, HIV positivity. All other patients were considered potentially trial-eligible. Thirty percent of the patients in our study were classified as trial-ineligible. Median first-line progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of trial-ineligible patients were inferior to that of potentially trial-eligible patients: PFS 16.2 months (95% CI (confidence interval) 11.1-20.4) vs. 27.3 months (95% CI 23.3-33.0); OS 34.2 months (95% CI 21.6-48.1) vs. 58.6 months (95% CI 48.6-64.4). A high percentage of non-transplant patients with MM in German routine care would be ineligible for participation in clinical trials. Despite similar treatment algorithms, their first-line PFS and OS were shorter than those of potentially trial-eligible patients; the survival data of the latter were similar to results from clinical trials. Physicians should be aware of the fact that results from clinical trials may not mirror "real world" patient outcomes when discussing outcome expectations with patients. Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT00889798.

GREEN (NCT01905943) is a non-randomized, open-label phase IIIb study investigating obinutuzumab alone or plus chemotherapy in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). We report a preplanned subgroup analysis of 158 previously untreated CLL patients receiving obinutuzumab-bendamustine (G-B). Patients received six 28-day cycles (C) of G-B: obinutuzumab day (D)1/D2 of C1 (25 mg D1/975 mg D2), 1000 mg D8 and D15 of C1, and D1 of C2-6; and bendamustine 70/90 mg/m 2 D1 and D2 of C1-6. The primary endpoint was safety/tolerability. Grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs) occurred in 82.3% of patients, including neutropenia (49.4%), thrombocytopenia (12.0%) and febrile neutropenia (10.8%). Serious AEs included neutropenia (12.7%), febrile neutropenia (9.5%) and pneumonia (7.6%). Rates of grade ≥3 infections and infusion-related reactions were 20.3% and 17.1%, respectively. Due to tumor lysis syndrome (TLS; 8.2%), including two associated fatalities (one in another study cohort), additional risk-minimization measures were implemented. Overall response rate was 81.0%. After 32.8 months' median observation time, 2-year progression-free survival was 81.8%. Minimal residual disease was undetectable in 59.5% (94/158) and 27.8% (44/158) of patients for blood and bone marrow, respectively. Frontline G-B appears to have manageable toxicity with clinical activity in CLL. Careful TLS risk assessment, pretreatment and monitoring is required.

Lenalidomide (LEN) is an immunomodulatory drug with significant clinical activity against relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (r/r MM). Based on the pivotal phase 3 trials MM-009 and MM-010, LEN in combination with dexamethasone (DEX) is approved for treatment of patients with MM who have received at least one prior therapy. LEN monotherapy is also approved in first line treatment. Here, we evaluated LEN/DEX combination therapy in a non-interventional study in patients with r/r MM in routine clinical practice. Patients received LEN/DEX as per Summary of Product Characteristics. Ninety-eight patients were treated with at least 1 cycle of LEN/DEX (median age 71 years; range, 42-88), forty-eight patients with at least 6 cycles. The Kaplan-Meier estimate for overall median time to progression was 12.0 months, 13.9 months for patients receiving second-line therapy and 10.3 months for third-line or higher-line therapy. The overall response rate was 60.2%. The median overall survival was 24.3 months. The most common adverse events were anemia (32.7%), thrombocytopenia (27.6%) and leukopenia (24.5%). Seven (7.1%) patients developed thromboembolic events despite prophylaxis. In conclusion, the combination of LEN/DEX administered to patients with r/r MM in routine clinical practice showed similar effectiveness and safety as demonstrated in the registration trials., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

This phase III, open-label, randomized, controlled study aimed to evaluate the benefit of adding continuous low-dose oral cyclophosphamide to bortezomib-dexamethasone in patients with primary relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive up to eight 3-week cycles of bortezomib (1.3 mg/m 2 ) and dexamethasone (20 mg; VD; n = 48) or bortezomib-dexamethasone plus oral cyclophosphamide (50 mg; VCD; n = 48). Median time to progression (primary endpoint) was slightly longer in the VD versus VCD group (12.6 vs 9.9 months, P = 0.192), and the hazard ratio for disease progression was in favor of VD (hazard ratio = 0.71, 95% confidence interval = 0.43-1.19, P = 0.196). The overall response rate was 74% with VD and 70% with VCD. Most adverse events were similar in frequency between arms; however, grade ≥ 3 peripheral neuropathy was more frequent in the VCD versus VD arm (15 vs 4%). Infection rate was higher in the VCD arm (64 vs 52%); however, grade ≥3 infection rates were comparable (19 vs 17%). Further trials are needed to determine whether addition of cyclophosphamide to VD at a different dose/schedule confers clinical benefit. This study was terminated prematurely, with insufficient sample size to adequately compare the arms; the results should, therefore, be considered descriptive. This trial is registered: EudraCT Number 2008-003213-27; ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00813150.

A nationwide, multi-institutional survey was performed in 2011 and 2015 to analyze routine practice for myeloma patients outside clinical trials in Germany. We contacted university hospitals, community hospitals, and office-based hematologists in order to enter clinical data from newly diagnosed and relapsed patients into an online platform. Complete datasets were available for 478 (2011) and 515 (2015) patients. While median age at diagnosis increased from 70 to 72 years, patients had fewer concomitant diseases (2011 61%; 2015 51%) and presented with equal performance status (ECOG 0-1, 2011 66%; 2015 68%). Cytogenetic analysis was performed in 53% (2011) and 59% (2015). Patients ≥70 years, or patients with comorbidities who were no candidates for autologous transplantation (ASCT), were less frequently tested for cytogenetic abnormalities (p = 0.001, respectively). There were more candidates for ASCT ≥65 years in 2015 (57%) than in 2011 (27%). Bortezomib was used in 92% of transplant-eligible and 66% of transplant-ineligible patients as frontline therapy in 2015. Application of bortezomib and lenalidomide for the first relapse changed from 2011 (bortezomib 45%; lenalidomide 27%) to 2015 (bortezomib 28%; lenalidomide 54%). For the second relapse, application of lenalidomide decreased from 2011 (36%) to 2015 (23%). Pomalidomide entered treatment for the second relapse in 2015 (11% of patients). Taken together, we demonstrate that results from clinical trials are implemented into general practice in Germany.

The combination of lenalidomide (Revlimid ® , R) and dexamethasone (d) is a standard regimen for patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (rrMM). With this regimen, only a small fraction of patients will achieve high quality responses [≥ very good partial response (VGPR)]. The combination of bendamustine (B), lenalidomide and dexamethasone (BRd) has shown high efficacy in patients with advanced rrMM. However, dose-limiting haematotoxicity restricted its use in extensively pre-treated patient populations. This prospective, multicentre Phase II study evaluated the efficacy and safety of BRd in rrMM patients with one prior line of therapy. Fifty patients were enrolled (median age 68·5 years [range 46-83]) and were treated with B 75 mg/m 2  days 1, 2; R 25 mg days 1-21 and d (40/20 mg) days 1, 8, 15 and 22, for 6 28-day induction cycles, followed by 12 cycles with Rd alone. Pegfilgrastim was administered according to protocol-defined criteria. The study aimed to demonstrate a complete response (CR)/VGPR rate of >40% after induction therapy. Of 45 evaluable patients, 23 (51%) achieved a CR/VGPR. Grade 4 neutropenia or thrombocytopenia occurred in 17 (34%) and 8 (16%) of patients, respectively. BRd is a safe and efficacious regimen as a second line treatment for rrMM, leading to high quality responses in a considerable proportion of patients., (© 2016 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

A survey was conducted to investigate the standard of care for multiple myeloma in Germany, in order to clarify the status of implementation of international and national treatment guidelines. In addition, the changes in disease management over time were investigated by comparison with surveys conducted in 2008 and 2009. The survey captured a representative sample of 478 myeloma patients with a mean age of 67.9 years across various stages of the disease. Diagnostic approaches, prognostic aspects and treatment decisions were evaluated based on a survey conducted in 2011 in 58 representative centres in Germany, including university and non-university hospitals and office-based haematologists. Data were collected from chart reviews and were analysed retrospectively. Over time, an increasing number of patients were investigated for cytogenetic abnormalities (53%). Age <69 years and lack of comorbid conditions were major determinants for cytogenetic testing. Bortezomib/chemotherapy-based regimens have become the preferred first-line treatments independent of planning autologous blood stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in first-line therapy. Thalidomide- and lenalidomide-based combination therapies are typically used as second-line treatments in 31% of patients. Compared with previous reviews, the frequency of ASCT was stable, at ~30% of patients. Younger age and indicators of more severe disease, such as the presence of CRAB criteria, influenced the decision in favour of performing ASCT. Compared to previous surveys, the requirement for erythropoietin and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, as well as transfusions of red blood cells and platelets, respectively, have decreased considerably. In summary, novel agents have led to a substantial change in the first-line and relapsed treatment approaches. Age and comorbidities remain major factors influencing treatment decisions, but cytogenetic testing to investigate myeloma-related risk profiles is increasingly integrated. The use of novel agents has affected supportive care, with reduced necessity for substitute blood products and reduced administration of bone marrow-stimulating factors.

Various treatment options exist for patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL). Clinical registries provide insight into routine treatment and identify changes in treatment over time. The Tumour Registry Lymphatic Neoplasms prospectively collects data on the treatment of patients with lymphoid B-cell neoplasm as administered by office-based haematologists in Germany. Data on patient and tumour characteristics, co-morbidities, systemic treatments, and outcome parameters are recorded. Eight hundred and six patients with CLL were recruited between May 2009 and August 2013. At the start of first-line treatment, median age was 71 years, 64% were male, and 44% had a Binet stage C disease. The most frequently used first-line/second-line regimens were bendamustine + rituximab (BR, 56%/55%), fludarabine + cyclophosphamide + rituximab (FCR, 22%/11%), and bendamustine (B, 5%/9%). Chlorambucil was used in only 7% (first-line) and 6% (second-line) of patients. Patients treated with FCR were younger and healthier than patients treated with BR. Overall, 91% of first-line treatments were successful (40% complete response). Real-life patient populations differ considerably from patients treated in randomized controlled trials. BR and FCR dominate the first-line and second-line treatments of CLL by office-based haematologists in Germany. Future analysis will investigate progression-free and overall survival times., (© 2014 The Authors. Hematological Oncology Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.)

Background/aims: The incorporation of bortezomib into the chemotherapeutic regimens for non-transplant patients with multiple myeloma resulted in improved outcomes in controlled studies. This prospective, non-interventional study assessed the effectiveness and safety of bortezomib-containing regimens in daily practice., Methods: Patients with untreated or relapsed multiple myeloma not eligible for high-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation and who were scheduled for bortezomib mono- or combination therapy or melphalan-prednisone (MP) alone were included in this study. Dosage and treatment decisions were at the discretion of the physicians., Results: 353 patients received bortezomib-containing therapies and 37 patients MP alone. Overall response rates at treatment end were 65.9% for bortezomib-containing therapies and 50.0% for MP. Partial or complete remissions considered best responses were achieved in 82.6% (first line) and 63.8% (second or later line) of the bortezomib-treated patients. The median duration of response to bortezomib-containing therapies was 18.2 months in 109 first-line and 11.3 months in 110 second- or later-line patients. Adverse drug reactions of any grade were reported during the treatment phase in 79.6% (bortezomib) and 70.3% (MP) of treated patients., Conclusion: Bortezomib-containing therapies were effective in patients with multiple myeloma in a real-life setting. The increasingly individualized treatment regimens of multiple myeloma require standardized assessments of response in daily practice., (© 2015 S. Karger GmbH, Freiburg.)

Introduction: Mobile geriatric rehabilitation is an outpatient rehabilitative treatment in which a multidisciplinary team treats elderly patients at home. This kind of treatment has been performed in rare cases in Germany but there are no data available on the effectiveness in patients with severe cognitive and functional impairment., Material and Methods: In a retrospective study design the data of all patients who had participated in mobile geriatric rehabilitation between 1 September 2009 and 23 May 2011 were evaluated. Before treatment a comprehensive geriatric assessment was performed and after treatment an assessment of mobility and activities of daily living (ADL). After 6 months a random sample of 20 patients were contacted by telephone to check the ADL., Results: A total of 87 patients were treated between 1 September 2009 and 23 May 2011. The median age was 83 years and 56 % of the patients lived in nursing homes. Only 24 % of the patients had MMSE scores > 23 points, 77 patients completed the treatment with an assessment and in these patients the ADL could be improved significantly (Barthel index at the beginning 36.2 points and on completion 50.9 points, p < 0.001). The Barthel index 6 months after treatment was only 1.25 points lower compared to the assessment at the end of the treatment. Significant improvement after therapy could also be demonstrated in the mobility assessment (timed up and go test, Tinetti mobility score and Esslinger transfer scale)., Conclusion: The results of this non-randomized and non-blinded trial indicated the efficacy of mobile geriatric rehabilitation. In functionally and cognitively impaired elderly patients ADL and mobility can be improved. These effects seem to persist for at least for 6 months.

Background: In a single-center retrospective donor versus no-donor comparison, we investigated if allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT) can improve the dismal course of poor-risk chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL)., Patients and Methods: All patients with CLL who were referred for evaluation of alloSCT within a 7-year time frame and had a donor search indication according to the EBMT criteria or because of Richter's transformation were included. Patients for whom a matched donor could be found within 3 months (matches) were compared with patients without such a donor (controls). Primary end point was overall survival measured from the 3-month landmark after search initiation., Results: Of 105 patients with donor search, 97 (matches 83; controls 14) were assessable at the 3-month landmark. Matches and controls were comparable for age, gender, time from diagnosis, number of previous regimens, and remission status. Disregarding if alloSCT was actually carried out or not, survival from the 3-month landmark was significantly better in matches versus controls [hazard ratio 0.38, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.17-0.85; P = 0.014]. The survival benefit of matches remained significant on multivariate analysis., Conclusion: This study provides first comparative evidence that alloSCT may have the potential to improve the natural course of poor-risk CLL as defined by the EBMT criteria.

Background: Various treatment options exist for patients with multiple myeloma (MM). Clinical registries provide insight into routine treatment and identify changes in treatment over time., Patients and Methods: The Tumour Registry Lymphatic Neoplasms (TLN) prospectively collects data on the treatment of patients with lymphoid B cell neoplasms as administered by office-based haematologists in Germany. Data on patient and tumour characteristics, comorbidities, systemic treatments and outcome parameters are recorded., Results: 371 non-transplant patients with MM were recruited between 2009 and 2011. At the start of first-line (second-line) treatment, the median age was 73 (75) years; 67% (74%) of the patients had stage III MM (classification of Durie and Salmon) and 19% (28%) had renal insufficiency. In the first line, 40% of the patients received bortezomib+melphalan+prednisone (VMP), 25% received bortezomib±dexamethasone (V±D) and 8% were treated with melphalan+prednisone+thalidomide (MPT). While use of bortezomib-based regimens increased from 67% (2009) to 85% (2011), use of melphalan-based regimens decreased from 68% to 48%. The overall objective response rate of treatment was 82%. In the second line, 34% of the patients received V±D and 16% lenalidomide+dexamethasone (LD)., Conclusion: Bortezomib-based regimens dominate the first- and second-line treatment of MM. Future analyses will investigate outcome data, e.g. effectiveness of bortezomib retherapy compared to other second-line treatments., (© 2014 S. Karger GmbH, Freiburg.)

Bendamustine demonstrated clinical activity in pre-treated hematological malignancies due to its unique mechanism of action distinct from standard alkylating agents. This study assessed its efficacy in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia pre-treated with an alkylator, in comparison to fludarabine. Patients with relapsed chronic lymphocytic leukemia requiring treatment after one previous systemic regimen (usually chlorambucil-based) were randomized to either receive bendamustine 100 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 2 of a 4-week cycle or standard fludarabine treatment consisting of 25 mg/m(2) on days 1 to 5 every 4 weeks. The primary objective was to achieve non-inferior progression-free survival (PFS) with bendamustine. Out of a total of 96 patients randomized, 92 were eligible, 49 allocated to bendamustine and 43 to fludarabine. About half of the patients received six or more cycles. Overall response rates were 76 % on bendamustine and 62 % on fludarabine, with clinical complete response rates of 27 and 9 %, respectively. Median PFS was 20.1 and 14.8 months (hazard ratio, 0.87; 90 % confidence interval, 0.60-1.27), median overall survival 43.8 and 41.0 months (hazard ratio, 0.82). Thrombocytopenia and gastrointestinal toxicities were marginally more frequent on bendamustine, albeit CTC grade 3/4 event incidence was similar. These data suggest at least comparable efficacy of bendamustine vs. fludarabine, pointing to an alternative treatment option in relapsing CLL patients after chlorambucil containing initial chemotherapy.

Treatment of relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma remains a challenge and novel treatment regimen are required. Here, a matched pair analysis was performed comparing TCID (thalidomide, cyclophosphamide, idarubicin, dexamethasone) treatment to the treatment of patients with VID (vincristine, idarubicin, dexamethasone) or with VRID (vinorelbine, idarubicin, dexamethasone) for relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. In total, 197 patients were enrolled in multicenter trials. After matching for important prognostic variables 46 matched-pairs (total of 138 patients) could be analysed with regard to survival, toxicity and efficacy. Interestingly, a significant improvement of overall response rate (ORR) for TCID treatment compared to VID and VRID was found. In addition, TCID treatment also led to a significantly higher overall survival (OS) as well as progression-free survival (PFS) compared to VID and VRID. In conclusion, TCID treatment appears to be superior to VRID and VID treatment in patients with progressive or refractory myeloma.

The CLL3 trial was designed to study intensive treatment including autologous stem cell transplantation (autoSCT) as part of first-line therapy in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Here, we present the long-term outcome of the trial with particular focus on the impact of genomic risk factors, and we provide a retrospective comparison with patients from the fludarabine-cyclophosphamide-rituximab (FCR) arm of the German CLL Study Group (GCLLSG) CLL8 trial. After a median observation time of 8.7 years (0.3-12.3 years), median progression-free survival (PFS), time to retreatment, and overall survival (OS) of 169 evaluable patients, including 38 patients who did not proceed to autoSCT, was 5.7, 7.3, and 11.3 years, respectively. PFS and OS were significantly reduced in the presence of 17p- and of an unfavorable immunoglobulin heavy variable chain mutational status, but not of 11q-. Five-year nonrelapse mortality was 6.5%. When 110 CLL3 patients were compared with 126 matched patients from the FCR arm of the CLL8 trial, 4-year time to retreatment (75% vs 77%) and OS (86% vs 90%) was similar despite a significant benefit for autoSCT in terms of PFS. In summary, early treatment intensification including autoSCT can provide very effective disease control in poor-risk CLL, although its clinical benefit in the FCR era remains uncertain. The trial has been registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT00275015.

Purpose: Treosulfan was introduced recently as a conditioning agent for allogeneic blood stem-cell transplantation. The favorable nonhematologic toxicity profile at 3 x 10 g/m(2) was the basis for dose escalation in this prospective, multicenter trial., Patients and Methods: Fifty-six patients with various hematologic malignancies who were not eligible for standard conditioning were treated with one of three doses: 10 g/m(2), 12 g/m(2), or 14 g/m(2) of intravenous treosulfan, which was administered on days -6 to -4 combined with fludarabine 30 mg/m(2) on days -6 to -2. Patients in complete remission (CR; 42%) or non-CR (58%) received grafts from matched related (47%) or matched unrelated (51%) donors; one patient had a mismatched related donor (2%)., Results: No engraftment failure occurred. Overall, extramedullary toxicity and the nonrelapse mortality rate at 2 years (20%) were low and did not increase with dose. Cumulative incidence of relapse/progression reached 31%. The overall survival and progression-free survival rates were 64% and 49%, respectively, in the total study population. An inverse dose dependency of relapse incidence was indicated in the subgroup receiving transplantations from matched related donors (P = .0568)., Conclusion: Treosulfan-based conditioning was feasible at all three doses. The 3 x 14 g/m(2) dose was selected for additional studies, because it combines desired characteristics of low toxicity and a low relapse rate.

Background: The present survey was undertaken to gain insights in the changes of disease management of multiple myeloma (MM) over time and the implementation of new guidelines into daily practice., Patients and Methods: Diagnosis and treatment of MM were evaluated based on a 3-month representative multicentre survey including 386 patients from 35 centres in Germany in 2008. The results were compared to similar surveys in 2004 and 2006., Results: At the time of first diagnosis, most patients (62.5%) were already in stage III (Durie-Salmon). The presence of deletion 13q was determined in 22% of patients only. However, determination of other prognostic factors has become increasingly well established. These include the levels of β2-microglobulin and serum albumin, each of which was determined in more than 2/3 of patients. Overall, 35% of patients were considered for high-dose chemotherapy. As a consequence of the development of innovative substances, there are remarkable shifts in first line, second line, and third line therapy with an increase in the use of bortezomib at all levels of therapy., Conclusions: Regarding diagnostic measures, deviations from recommended guidelines became evident. Also, high-dose chemotherapy with stem cell support was considered in a minority of patients only. Novel substances, however, were rapidly integrated into the treatment of MM., (Copyright © 2010 S. Karger AG, Basel.)

Bendamustine is a cytotoxic agent that combines alkylating and antimetabolite effects. It has shown promising efficacy in a number of hematological cancers and, hence, is being investigated in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), which is the most common form of adult leukemia in the Western world. Phase I/II trials with bendamustine as single-agent therapy in CLL have shown overall response rates of 56-93% and complete response rates of 7-29%. Preliminary data from a Phase III trial comparing bendamustine and chlorambucil (an agent widely used in the current treatment of CLL) have shown significantly higher response rates with bendamustine. Bendamustine has also shown activity in CLL when combined with mitoxantrone, rituximab or both. The principal toxicities associated with bendamustine are hematological, mainly leukopenia.

Purpose: We investigated the in vitro toxicity of bendamustine and fludarabine to hematopoietic progenitors and stem cells from healthy donors., Methods: Clonogenic agar colony assays, non-clonogenic long-term liquid cultures (LTC) and apoptosis assays were used to assess the cytotoxicity of both the agents., Results: Total colony-forming units (CFU) were more sensitive to fludarabine than to bendamustine in agar colony assays (IC(50) 0.7 microM/L and 8.5 microM/L, respectively). Using the Bliss independence model and combining the two agents yielded additive inhibition of progenitors. Non-clonogenic assays, including LTC and an apoptosis assay detecting activated caspases showed that stem cells are characterized by low sensitivity to bendamustine. In contrast, fludarabine strongly inhibited the viability and growth of stem cells in LTC., Conclusions: Our data show that bendamustine is characterized by lower in vitro toxicity to hematopoietic progenitors and stem cells than fludarabine and might thus be preferable in regimens prior to stem cells apheresis.

R-etodolac is a novel pro-apoptotic agent with potential antitumor activity against B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia (B-CLL). This phase I clinical trial was conducted to determine the tolerability, safety, and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of R-etodolac, administered orally twice a day (BID), in patients with B-CLL. Secondary objectives included evaluating clinical response, pharmacodynamic activity (reduction of lymphocytes), and pharmacokinetic (PK) profile. Forty-three patients were enrolled in the study. The most frequently reported adverse events were diarrhea, rash, pruritus, and headache. Increases in alanine aminotransferase (ALT) were also observed. Adverse events were generally mild and self-limiting, although in an apparent dose-response relationship, grade 2 and 3 gastrointestinal toxicities and grade 3 skin toxicities were reported with the highest dose regimens (1,800 and 2,400 mg BID). Hematologic toxicity was rare. The MTD was determined to be 1,200 mg BID. PK results indicated that oral absorption of R-etodolac was rapid (time to maximum concentration ranged from 2 to 4 h), and the half-life ranged from 5 to 7 h. The increase in maximum concentration, however, was not proportional to the increase in dose. R-etodolac significantly reduced absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) in B-CLL patients in a dose-dependent manner up to 1,800 mg BID and caused partial responses in 2 patients. Further study of R-etodolac as a possible new maintenance therapy or as a part of combination therapy of B-CLL appears warranted.

Reduced-intensity conditioning with fludarabine and treosulfan before allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT) was introduced several years ago. Although its feasibility has recently been proven, only limited data are available on myelotoxicity, engraftment kinetics, and the significance of hematopoietic chimerism using this novel conditioning regimen. To clarify these open questions, we analyzed 27 patients with various hematological diseases, who received allogeneic SCT preceded by fludarabine/treosulfan conditioning. Further assessment endpoints included graft-vs-host disease (GvHD), mortality, and overall survival (OS). Allogeneic SCT was followed by neutropenia (absolute neutrophil count < or = 0.5 x 10(9)/l) and thrombocytopenia (platelets < or = 20 x 10(9)/l) in all patients. All patients showed stable neutrophil engraftment, and all except one had stable platelet engraftment. Grades II-IV acute GvHD was found in 48% of patients, whereas 52% developed chronic GvHD. The treatment-related mortality on day +100, 1 year after SCT, and at the last follow-up was 11, 26, and 33%, respectively. We found complete chimerism rates of 46, 57, and 72% on days +28, +56, and at the last follow-up or before death, respectively. The underlying malignancy tended to relapse more frequently in patients with mixed chimerism than in those with complete chimerism on day +28 as well as on day +56 (not significant). Additionally, no significant association was found between hematopoietic chimerism and donor type, GvHD, or OS, respectively. We conclude that reduced-intensity conditioning with fludarabine and treosulfan before allogeneic SCT is myeloablative, provides stable engraftment, and leads to complete chimerism in the majority of patients.

Purpose: Rituximab has been shown to be active in follicular lymphoma (FL), both as monotherapy and in combination with chemotherapy. We conducted a randomized trial comparing mitoxantrone, chlorambucil, and prednisolone (MCP) chemotherapy plus rituximab with MCP alone., Patients and Methods: Previously untreated patients with stage III or IV CD20+ indolent or mantle cell lymphoma were randomly assigned to either eight 28-day cycles of MCP plus rituximab (R-MCP; n = 181) or eight cycles of MCP alone (n = 177). All patients who achieved a complete or partial remission were treated with interferon maintenance until relapse. Herein, we report the results from the primary analysis population of patients with FL, who constituted the majority of patients (56%) recruited to the trial (n = 201; R-MCP, n = 105; MCP, n = 96)., Results: Rates of overall and complete response were significantly higher in the R-MCP arm than the MCP arm (overall response, 92% v 75%, respectively; P = .0009; complete response, 50% v 25%, respectively; P = .004). With a median follow-up time of 47 months, median event-free survival (EFS) and progression-free survival (PFS) times were significantly prolonged with R-MCP compared with MCP (EFS, not reached v 26 months, respectively; P < .0001; PFS, not reached v 28.8 months, respectively; P < .0001), and overall survival (OS) was significantly improved with R-MCP compared with MCP (4-year OS rate, 87% v 74%, respectively; P = .0096)., Conclusion: The R-MCP regimen significantly improves complete and overall response rates, EFS, PFS, and OS in patients with previously untreated advanced FL, without a clinically significant increase in toxicity.

In recent years, reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) regimens before allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT) are increasingly used in patients not eligible for conventional conditioning. We did a retrospective, multicenter analysis to assess the feasibility of conditioning with fludarabine and treosulfan before allogeneic SCT in multiple myeloma patients. Thirty-four patients with a median age of 51.5 years were included in the analysis. All patients underwent myeloablation after conditioning followed by stable engraftment, and 29 of 31 evaluable patients (94%) showed early complete hematopoietic chimerism. Non-hematological toxicities were limited and encompassed mainly fever in neutropenia and infections. Grade II-IV acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease was observed in 33 and 39%, respectively. With a median follow-up of 708 days (range 60-1729 days), the median progression-free survival was 180 days. The treatment-related mortality was 10% on day 100 and 25% after 1 year. The median overall survival has not yet been reached. Our data indicate that conditioning with fludarabine and treosulfan before allogeneic SCT is feasible in intensively pretreated multiple myeloma patients and leads to stable engraftment and complete hematopoietic chimerism. Randomized trials are warranted to determine if this approach might be incorporated in an algorithm of multiple myeloma treatment.

Acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) occurs in up to 80% of patients who undergo allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT) and contributes significantly to transplant-related mortality (TRM). We conducted a prospective phase II trial to assess the efficacy and feasibility of treating steroid-refractory aGVHD with basiliximab, a chimaeric monoclonal antibody directed against the alpha chain of the interleukin-2 (IL-2) receptor. Basiliximab was administered intravenously at a dose of 20 mg on days 1 and 4. Twenty-three patients were enrolled between October 1999 and July 2004. We found a primary overall response rate of 82.5% with four patients (17.5%) showing a complete response and 15 patients (65%) a partial response. Six patients were again treated successfully with an IL-2 receptor antagonist because of recurrence of aGVHD. The rates of infections, chronic GVHD, malignancy recurrence and 1-year TRM following immunosuppression with basiliximab were comparable with those found with other treatment modalities for aGVHD. We conclude that basiliximab is efficient and feasible for steroid-refractory aGVHD and merits further evaluation.