Search

Katherine A Kelly,1 Patrick O Perche,1 Steven R Feldman1– 4 1Center for Dermatology Research, Department of Dermatology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA; 2Department of Pathology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA; 3Department of Social Sciences & Health Policy, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA; 4Department of Dermatology, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, DenmarkCorrespondence: Steven R Feldman, Department of Dermatology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Medical Center Boulevard, Winston-Salem, NC, 27157-1071, USA, Tel +1 336-716-7740, Fax +1 336-716-7732, Email sfeldman@wakehealth.eduAbstract: Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic inflammatory skin disease that greatly impacts patient quality of life. Type 2 cytokine interleukin (IL)-13 is integral to the pathogenesis of AD. Tralokinumab is a fully human IgG4 monoclonal antibody that specifically targets IL-13, preventing downstream signaling of inflammatory pathways that may contribute to AD. Tralokinumab was US Food and Drug administration (FDA) recently approved for the treatment of moderate to severe AD on December 28, 2021. In our review, we will explore the efficacy and adverse effects (AEs) of tralokinumab for the treatment of patients with moderate to severe AD. A PubMed search for key articles on the emerging clinical data of tralokinumab was performed. Six randomized controlled trials of tralokinumab identified improvements in disease severity measures, including Investigator’s Global Assessment (IGA) scores and Eczema Area Severity Index 75 (EASI75) scores. Four of these studies demonstrated improvements in quality of life measures with tralokinumab, including pruritus scores, sleep interference scores, Dermatology Life Quality Index, SCORing Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD), Patient Oriented Eczema Measure, and The Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36v2) scores. One study identified a similar immune response in patients taking tralokinumab to those taking the Tdap and meningococcal vaccines. Upper respiratory infection, conjunctivitis, and headaches were the most common adverse events. The varying criteria to assess changes in AD disease severity across different studies is a limitation of this review. Tralokinumab is another promising biologic option for the treatment of moderate to severe AD, which may reduce disease burden and improve patient quality of life.Keywords: biosimilar, biologic, non-medical switching, real-world data

A patient presented to clinic with atopic dermatitis that had been previously unresponsive to multiple topical and systemic therapies. They were successfully treated with a combination of tralokinumab and upadacitinib, showing significant improvement after 3 weeks and near-resolution after 6 months.

Abstract Therapeutic IgG4 antibodies engage in Fab‐arm exchange with endogenous human immunoglobulin G4 (IgG4) to form monovalent hybrid molecules. A mechanistic population model was developed to quantitatively characterize the dynamic Fab‐arm exchange of tralokinumab, a human IgG4 monoclonal antibody currently being developed for the treatment of atopic dermatitis, with endogenous IgG4 in healthy volunteers. The estimated pharmacokinetic parameters for IgG4 were similar to those of immunoglobulin G1 or immunoglobulin G2 in humans. However, the mechanistically modeled clearance of half molecules is 21‐fold higher, likely due to the loss of avidity for the neonatal Fc receptor. Half molecules of tralokinumab randomly associate with those of endogenous IgG4 to form monovalent hybrid molecules, which became the dominant form of tralokinumab within 1 day postdose in healthy volunteers. As the potency of monovalent tralokinumab is comparable with that of bivalent tralokinumab, the IgG4 Fab‐arm exchange with endogenous IgG4 is not expected to affect the potency of neutralization of interleukin‐13 in vivo.

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic, inflammatory, intensely pruritic skin disorder associated with significant patient burden. Interleukin (IL)-13 is a cytokine that acts as a driver of immune dysregulation, skin-barrier dysfunction, and microbiome dysbiosis that characterizes AD, and is consistently overexpressed in AD skin. Tralokinumab is a fully human immunoglobulin (Ig) G4 monoclonal antibody that binds specifically to IL-13 with high affinity, thereby inhibiting subsequent downstream IL-13 signaling. Three pivotal phase 3 clinical trials demonstrated that tralokinumab 300 mg every other week, as monotherapy or in combination with topical corticosteroids as needed, provides significant improvements in signs and symptoms of moderate-to-severe AD, as measured by Investigator's Global Assessment 0/1 (clear/almost clear) and Eczema Area and Severity Index-75 at Week 16. Improvements were observed soon after tralokinumab initiation and were maintained over 52 weeks of therapy. Tralokinumab significantly improved patient-reported outcomes such as itch and sleep, and demonstrated a safety profile comparable with placebo; conjunctivitis during tralokinumab therapy was generally mild. Similar results were observed in a phase 3 adolescent trial. The role of IL-13 in the pathophysiology of AD justifies a targeted approach and a wealth of clinical data supports tralokinumab as a new therapeutic option for people with moderate-to-severe AD., (© 2023 The Authors. Allergy published by European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Objective: To review pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and safety of tralokinumab in treatment of atopic dermatitis (AD). Data Sources: Literature review was conducted using MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE, and ClinicalTrials.gov for articles published between January 2010 and May 2022. Study selection and data extraction: Articles in English discussing tralokinumab in AD were included. Data synthesis: In one phase 2 trial, more subjects treated with tralokinumab 150 and 300 mg achieved an Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) of 0/1 with minimum ≥2 point IGA reduction (23%), versus placebo (11.8%, P = 0.10). During 2 phase 3 trials, more subjects treated with tralokinumab achieved IGA success (ECZTRA 1: 15.8% and ECZTRA 2: 22.2%), versus placebo (7.1% and 10.9%, respectively; P = 0.002 and P < 0.001). During one phase 3 trial, in conjunction with topical corticosteroids (TCS), more subjects treated with tralokinumab 300 mg achieved IGA success (ECZTRA 3: 38.9%), versus placebo (26.2%, P = 0.015). During another phase 3 trial in subjects with resistance or contraindication to oral cyclosporine, more subjects treated with tralokinumab 300 mg achieved an Eczema Area Severity Index 75 (64.2%), versus placebo (50.5%, P = 0.018). Relevance to patient care and clinical practice: Tralokinumab is efficacious for moderate-to-severe AD, as monotherapy, in conjunction with TCS, and resistance or contraindication to cyclosporine. Although IL-4 and IL-13 are both implicated in AD's pathogenesis, IL-13 is overexpressed, and head-to-head trials are needed to assess efficacy of tralokinumab, versus dupilumab. Compared with upadacitinib and abrocitinib, tralokinumab is not associated with black-box warnings. Conclusions: Tralokinumab is an efficacious and safe systemic treatment for moderate-to-severe AD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction/Background Clinical trials of up to 52 weeks showed that tralokinumab, a monoclonal antibody that specifically neutralizes interleukin-13, was efficacious and well-tolerated as monotherapy and combination with TCS. Objectives Here, we evaluate the long-term safety of tralokinumab in an integrated analysis of seven phase 3 parent trials (PTs) (NCT03131648, NCT03160885, NCT03363854, NCT03562377, NCT03526861, NCT03761537, NCT04587453), and the ongoing, up to 5-year extension study (ECZTEND; NCT03587805). Methods Two datasets were analyzed: placebo-controlled (initial 16-week period of the PTs), and all-tralokinumab combining PTs with ECZTEND including patients from first dose until end of tralokinumab exposure or data cut-off (April 30th, 2022). In the all-tralokinumab dataset, periods on placebo were disregarded. Treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) were recorded. AEs of special interest (AESIs) were predefined. Proportions of patients with events and incidence rates (IR) per 100 patient-years of exposure (PYE) were calculated. PYE was defined as time until first event or exposure end, whichever came first, and incidence was defined as first event. Results 2693 patients (≥12 years) received tralokinumab for up to 238.5 weeks (≈4.5 years) with a median exposure time of 76.5 weeks in the all-tralokinumab dataset. Median age at baseline was 33.0 years (min-max; 12-92). 10.4% of patients were 12-17 years. 2307 patients experienced an AE (IR=202.0), most (97.3%) of which were mild-to-moderate. Serious AEs (SAEs) were reported in 226 patients (IR=4.5); SAEs were considered possibly or probably related by the investigator in 50 patients (IR=0.9). No preferred term level SAEs were reported with an IR≥0.1. Discontinuation of treatment due to AEs was low (IR=2.8). AEs leading to drug withdrawal with an IR>0.1 were dermatitis atopic (IR=0.5) and injection site reaction (ISR) (IR=0.2). Frequently reported AEs in the all-tralokinumab dataset were consistent with the placebo-controlled dataset, including nasopharyngitis (IR=18.4), upper respiratory tract infection (IR=6.9), conjunctivitis (IR=5.0), ISR (IR=3.6), conjunctivitis allergic (IR=2.7), and injection site pain (IR=1.5). AESIs, including eye disorders, skin infections requiring systemic treatment, eczema herpeticum, and malignancies, were observed in the all-tralokinumab dataset at rates similar to or lower than the placebo-controlled dataset. Conclusion Long-term use of tralokinumab, for up to 4.5 years, was well-tolerated, and the pattern of AEs was consistent with the initial placebo-controlled treatment period with no new safety signals identified. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Competing Interests: Conflicts of interest the authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Tralokinumab has been recently approved for the management of moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD). Despite its effectiveness and safety have been widely reported, there are no studies investigating factors that may affect clinical outcomes. Background: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of tralokinumab, also to investigate possible predictive response factors that may affect the time of onset of treatment response. Objective: A monocentric retrospective real-life study was performed enrolling AD patients undergoing treatment with tralokinumab for at least 24 weeks. AD severity was assessed at baseline and at week (W)16, and W24. Similarly, treatment-related adverse events (AEs) were evaluated at each follow-up visit. Methods: A monocentric retrospective real-life study was performed enrolling AD patients undergoing treatment with tralokinumab for at least 24 weeks. AD severity was assessed at baseline and at week (W)16, and W24. Similarly, treatment-related adverse events (AEs) were evaluated at each follow-up visit. Results: Our study confirmed the effectiveness and safety of tralokinumab. In particular, a higher pruritus, a relapsing course of the disease, a reduced EASI, a reduced IGA, and a brief duration of the disease seem to be associated with the fastest onset of treatment effectiveness. Conclusions: Our study confirmed the effectiveness and safety of tralokinumab. In particular, a higher pruritus, a relapsing course of the disease, a reduced EASI, a reduced IGA, and a brief duration of the disease seem to be associated with the fastest onset of treatment effectiveness.