101. Impaired automatic but intact volitional inhibition in primary tic disorders
- Author
-
Sachin Modi, Anna Latorre, Vishal Rawji, Kailash P. Bhatia, Lorenzo Rocchi, Eileen M. Joyce, John C. Rothwell, Leanne Hockey, and Marjan Jahanshahi
- Subjects
Adult ,Male ,Tic disorder ,congenital, hereditary, and neonatal diseases and abnormalities ,Tics ,medicine.medical_treatment ,Synaptic Transmission ,Young Adult ,Repetition Priming ,Healthy volunteers ,Healthy control ,mental disorders ,transcranial magnetic stimulation ,medicine ,Humans ,In patient ,Reactive inhibition ,business.industry ,Tourette ,tics ,Motor Cortex ,Original Articles ,medicine.disease ,nervous system diseases ,Transcranial magnetic stimulation ,body regions ,Inhibition, Psychological ,medicine.anatomical_structure ,Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity ,Case-Control Studies ,Tic Disorders ,Female ,Neurology (clinical) ,behavioural inhibition ,business ,Neuroscience ,human activities ,Psychomotor Performance ,Motor cortex ,Tourette Syndrome - Abstract
See Jackson and Jackson (doi:10.1093/brain/awaa050) for a scientific commentary on this article. What causes tics? Rawji et al. use a combination of behavioural tasks, mathematical modelling and non-invasive brain stimulation to show that voluntary inhibition is unimpaired in patients with primary tic disorders. Conversely, automatic inhibition is impaired, and this impairment correlates with motor tic severity., The defining character of tics is that they can be transiently suppressed by volitional effort of will, and at a behavioural level this has led to the concept that tics result from a failure of inhibition. However, this logic conflates the mechanism responsible for the production of tics with that used in suppressing them. Volitional inhibition of motor output could be increased to prevent the tic from reaching the threshold for expression, although this has been extensively investigated with conflicting results. Alternatively, automatic inhibition could prevent the initial excitation of the striatal tic focus—a hypothesis we have previously introduced. To reconcile these competing hypotheses, we examined different types of motor inhibition in a group of 19 patients with primary tic disorders and 15 healthy volunteers. We probed proactive and reactive inhibition using the conditional stop-signal task, and applied transcranial magnetic stimulation to the motor cortex, to assess movement preparation and execution. We assessed automatic motor inhibition with the masked priming task. We found that volitional movement preparation, execution and inhibition (proactive and reactive) were not impaired in tic disorders. We speculate that these mechanisms are recruited during volitional tic suppression, and that they prevent expression of the tic by inhibiting the nascent excitation released by the tic generator. In contrast, automatic inhibition was abnormal/impaired in patients with tic disorders. In the masked priming task, positive and negative compatibility effects were found for healthy controls, whereas patients with tics exhibited strong positive compatibility effects, but no negative compatibility effect indicative of impaired automatic inhibition. Patients also made more errors on the masked priming task than healthy control subjects and the types of errors were consistent with impaired automatic inhibition. Errors associated with impaired automatic inhibition were positively correlated with tic severity. We conclude that voluntary movement preparation/generation and volitional inhibition are normal in tic disorders, whereas automatic inhibition is impaired—a deficit that correlated with tic severity and thus may constitute a potential mechanism by which tics are generated.
- Published
- 2020