101. Brain Tumor Characterization Using Multibiometric Evaluation of MRI
- Author
-
Markus Nilsson, Anna Rydelius, Linda Knutsson, Thomas L. Chenevert, Pia C. Sundgren, Johan Bengzon, Jimmy Lätt, Isabella M. Björkman-Burtscher, Faris Durmo, Silke Engelholm, Sara Kinhult, Krister Askaner, and Elisabet Englund
- Subjects
diffusion-weighted imaging ,Brain tumor ,specificity ,Article ,030218 nuclear medicine & medical imaging ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Glioma ,glioma ,Fractional anisotropy ,medicine ,Effective diffusion coefficient ,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging ,brain metastasis ,perfusion-weighted imaging ,medicine.diagnostic_test ,Receiver operating characteristic ,business.industry ,Magnetic resonance imaging ,medicine.disease ,sensitivity ,3. Good health ,MRI ,brain tumor ,Cerebral blood flow ,Nuclear medicine ,business ,030217 neurology & neurosurgery ,Diffusion MRI - Abstract
The aim was to evaluate volume, diffusion, and perfusion metrics for better presurgical differentiation between high-grade gliomas (HGG), low-grade gliomas (LGG), and metastases (MET). For this retrospective study, 43 patients with histologically verified intracranial HGG (n = 18), LGG (n = 10), and MET (n = 15) were chosen. Preoperative magnetic resonance data included pre- and post-gadolinium contrast-enhanced T1-weighted fluid-attenuated inversion recover, cerebral blood flow (CBF), cerebral blood volume (CBV), fractional anisotropy, and apparent diffusion coefficient maps used for quantification of magnetic resonance biometrics by manual delineation of regions of interest. A binary logistic regression model was applied for multiparametric analysis and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Statistically significant differences were found for normalized-ADC-tumor (nADC-T), normalized-CBF-tumor (nCBF-T), normalized-CBV-tumor (nCBV-T), and normalized-CBF-edema (nCBF-E) between LGG and HGG, and when these metrics were combined, HGG could be distinguished from LGG with a sensitivity and specificity of 100%. The only metric to distinguish HGG from MET was the normalized-ADC-E with a sensitivity of 68.8% and a specificity of 80%. LGG can be distinguished from MET by combining edema volume (Vol-E), Vol-E/tumor volume (Vol-T), nADC-T, nCBF-T, nCBV-T, and nADC-E with a sensitivity of 93.3% and a specificity of 100%. The present study confirms the usability of a multibiometric approach including volume, perfusion, and diffusion metrics in differentially diagnosing brain tumors in preoperative patients and adds to the growing body of evidence in the clinical field in need of validation and standardization.
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF