Search

BACKGROUND: The majority of germ cell tumour (GCT) patients can be cured by orchiectomy followed by active surveillance or subsequent systemic and/or local treatments. There are various guidelines for a structured follow-up including radiographic and clinical examinations.OBJECTIVE: The Swiss Austrian German Testicular Cancer Cohort Study (SAG TCCS) prospectively evaluates follow-up, indicator of relapse and late toxicities. This is a descriptive analysis; we present baseline characteristics and treatment strategies for the first 299 patients with primary GCT or relapsed GCT after completion of treatment.RESULTS: Of the patients included in this study, 192 (64.2%) had seminoma and 107 (35.8%) non-seminoma. Mean age was 41 years (standard deviation [SD] 11.7) for seminoma and 31 (SD 9.3) years for non-seminoma patients. Median tumour size was 3.5 cm (interquartile range 2.5¬‒5.0 and 2.3‒4.5 in seminoma and non-seminoma, respectively) in both histological groups. Among seminoma patients, 81 (42.2%) had primary tumours >4cm; 154 (80.2%) seminoma patients had stage I, 26 (13.5%) stage II and 12 (6.3%) stage III disease. Fifty-seven (53.3%) non-seminoma tumours were stage I, 29 (27.1%) stage II and 21 (19.6%) stage III. Marker-positive disease was present in 58 (30.2%) seminoma patients and 78 (72.9%) non-seminoma patients. Of 154 stage I seminoma patients, 89 (57.8%) chose active surveillance and 65 (42.2%) adjuvant chemotherapy. Twenty-six (45.6%) stage I non-seminoma patients had high-risk disease; 23 of these were treated with adjuvant chemotherapy and 3 chose active surveillance. Among the 30 (52.6%) low risk stage I patients, all opted for active surveillance. Twelve (46.2%) stage II seminoma patients had radiotherapy, 14 (53.8%) were treated with three to four cycles of chemotherapy. All stage III seminoma patients, and all stage II and III non-seminoma patients were treated with three to four cycles of chemotherapy. Treatment decisions were made at the respective centre. Eleven patients did not receive therapy that conformed with guidelines.CONCLUSION: It is important to enrol GCT patients in prospective studies in general, but also in follow-up studies to assess baseline characteristics, oncological outcome, and long-term toxicity and to validate the performance of follow-up schedules. This is the first time that the distribution of disease, detailed baseline characteristics and the respective treatment of men with GCT is collected in a prospective manner in German speaking countries (Switzerland, Austria and Germany) and therefore patterns of care have been evaluated. SAG TCCS results will inform on future modifications of surveillance schedules and follow-up procedures.TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02229916 (Clinicaltrials.gov).

With longitudinal untargeted assessment of circulating tumor DNA in metastatic HR+ breast cancer patients during CDK4/6 treatment and joint model analyses, we demonstrated that tumor fraction trajectories rather than single time point measurements provide important dynamic information on developing disease progression. The joint model can also use the trajectories for providing dynamic predictions for the individual patient., Despite improved clinical outcomes, intrinsic or acquired resistance to CDK4/6 inhibitor treatment has limited the success of this treatment in HR+HER2− metastatic breast cancer patients. Biomarkers are urgently needed, and longitudinal biomarker measurements may harbor more dynamic predictive and prognostic information compared to single time point measurements. The aim of this study was to explore the longitudinal evolution of circulating tumor fractions within cell‐free DNA assessed by an untargeted sequencing approach during CDK4/6 therapy and to quantify the potential association between longitudinal z‐score measurements and clinical outcome by using joint models. Forty‐nine HR+HER2− metastatic breast cancer patients were enrolled, and z‐score levels were measured at baseline and during 132 follow‐up visits (median number of measurements per patient = 3, 25th–75th percentile: 3–5, range: 1–8). We observed higher baseline z‐score levels (estimated difference 0.57, 95% CI: 0.147–0.983, P‐value = 0.008) and a constant increase of z‐score levels over follow‐up time (overall P‐value for difference in log z‐score over time = 0.024) in patients who developed progressive disease. Importantly, the joint model revealed that elevated z‐score trajectories were significantly associated with higher progression risk (HR of log z‐score at any time of follow‐up = 3.3, 95% CI, 1.44–7.55, P = 0.005). In contrast, single z‐score measurement at CDK4/6 inhibitor treatment start did not predict risk of progression. In this prospective study, we demonstrate proof‐of‐concept that longitudinal z‐score trajectories rather than single time point measurements may harbor important dynamic information on the development of disease progression in HR+HER2− breast cancer patients undergoing CDK4/6 inhibitor treatment.

Einleitung: Die Metastasektomie stellt ein mögliches Verfahren in der Behandlungskaskade des metastasierten Nierenzellkarzinoms als Alternative zu systemischen Therapien wie Checkpoint- und/oder Tyrosinkinaseinhibitoren dar. Diese Behandlungsoption kann Patienten mitunter lang andauernde Remissionen[zum vollständigen Text gelangen Sie über die oben angegebene URL], 46. Gemeinsame Tagung der Bayerischen Urologenvereinigung und der Österreichischen Gesellschaft für Urologie und Andrologie

Diabetes mellitus (DM) and hyperglycemia are known predictors of adverse outcome in different tumor entities. The present study investigated the effect of DM and pre-surgery blood glucose levels on cancer specific survival (CSS), overall survival (OS), and disease-free survival (DFS) in non-metastatic soft tissue sarcoma (STS) patients. A total of 475 STS patients who underwent curative resection were included in this retrospective study. CSS, DFS, and OS were assessed using Kaplan–Meier curves. The association between pre-existing DM as well as mean pre-surgery blood glucose levels and all 3 survival endpoints was analyzed using Cox-hazard proportional (for OS and DFS) and competing risk regression models (for CSS). In unadjusted analysis, DM was significantly associated with adverse CSS (sub-hazard ratio [SHR]: 2.14, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.18–3.90, p = 0.013) and OS (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.05, 95% CI 1.28–3.28) and remained significant after adjusting for established prognostic factors (CSS: adjusted SHR 2.33, 95% CI 1.21–4.49, p = 0.012; OS: adjusted HR 1.96, 95% CI 1.17–3.28, p = 0.010), respectively. There was no significant association of DM with DFS (p = 0.149). The mean pre-surgery glucose levels were not significantly associated with inferior outcome (CSS: p = 0.510, OS: p = 0.382 and DFS: p = 0.786). This study shows, that DM represents a negative prognostic factor for clinical outcome in STS patients after curative resection.

Targeting the ataxia telangiectasia and RAD3-related (ATR) enzyme represents a promising anticancer strategy for tumors with DNA damage response (DDR) defects and replication stress, including inactivation of ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) signaling. We report the dose-escalation portion of the phase I first-in-human trial of oral ATR inhibitor BAY 1895344 intermittently dosed 5 to 80 mg twice daily in 21 patients with advanced solid tumors. The MTD was 40 mg twice daily 3 days on/4 days off. Most common adverse events were manageable and reversible hematologic toxicities. Partial responses were achieved in 4 patients and stable disease in 8 patients. Median duration of response was 315.5 days. Responders had ATM protein loss and/or deleterious ATM mutations and received doses ≥40 mg twice daily. Overall, BAY 1895344 is well tolerated, with antitumor activity against cancers with certain DDR defects, including ATM loss. An expansion phase continues in patients with DDR deficiency. Significance: Oral BAY 1895344 was tolerable, with antitumor activity in heavily pretreated patients with various advanced solid tumors, particularly those with ATM deleterious mutations and/or loss of ATM protein; pharmacodynamic results supported a mechanism of action of increased DNA damage. Further study is warranted in this patient population. See related commentary by Italiano, p. 14. This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 1

Testicular germ cell tumors (TGCTs) are the most commonly diagnosed malignancies in younger men. The monitoring of disease course and recurrence is supported by traditional tumor markers, including α-fetoprotein (AFP). AFP is physiologically synthesized in the liver and can be detected at increased levels in testicular cancer patients as well as under other benign liver diseases, which have been reported as a misleading cause of interpretation of TGCTs clinical course. A cluster of stem cell-associated microRNAs has been reported to outperform traditional tumor markers in newly diagnosed TGCTs, but the value of these microRNAs to differentiate between specific and unspecific AFP elevations, has never been reported. We report here a patient with chronic hepatitis B and normal liver related blood values presenting with a surgically removed primary TGCT and elevated AFP levels. Clinical staging revealed a suspect retroperitoneal metastatic lymph node together with other risk factors and first line treatment with PEB chemotherapy was administered. During curative treatment significantly rising AFP levels led to the assumption of chemo-resistant disease, mandating the initiation of salvage chemotherapy and surgical removal of the putative lymph node metastases. The AFP levels continuously decreased with the interruption of chemotherapeutic agents, indicating a chemotherapy-induced liver toxicity on the basis of pre-existing liver disease. MiR-371a-3p serum levels were not detectable in serum samples with elevated AFP levels. In conclusion, miR-371a-3p may be a reliable biomarker to differentiate between non-specific AFP elevations in TGCTs patients.

Background: Biomarkers for predicting response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) are scarce and often lack external validation. This study provides a comprehensive investigation of pretreatment C-reactive protein (CRP) levels as well as its longitudinal trajectories as a marker of treatment response and disease outcome in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) undergoing immunotherapy with anti PD-1 or anti PD-L1 agents. Methods: We performed a retrospective bi-center study to assess the association between baseline CRP levels and anti PD-(L)1 treatment outcomes in the discovery cohort (n = 90), confirm these findings in an external validation cohort (n = 101) and explore the longitudinal evolution of CRP during anti PD-(L)1 treatment and the potential impact of dynamic CRP changes on treatment response and disease outcome in the discovery cohort. Joint models were implemented to evaluate the association of longitudinal CRP trajectories and progression risk. Primary treatment outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), while the objective response rate (ORR) was a secondary outcome, respectively. Results: In the discovery cohort, elevated pretreatment CRP levels emerged as independent predictors of worse PFS (HR per doubling of baseline CRP = 1.37, 95% CI: 1.16&ndash, 1.63, p &lt, 0.0001), worse OS (HR per doubling of baseline CRP = 1.42, 95% CI: 1.18&ndash, 1.71, p &lt, 0.0001) and a lower ORR ((odds ratio (OR) of ORR per doubling of baseline CRP = 0.68, 95% CI: 0.51&ndash, 0.92, p = 0.013)). In the validation cohort, pretreatment CRP could be fully confirmed as a predictor of PFS and OS, but not ORR. Elevated trajectories of CRP during anti PD-(L)1 treatment (adjusted HR per 10 mg/L increase in CRP = 1.22, 95% CI: 1.15&ndash, 1.30, p &lt, 0.0001), as well as a faster increases of CRP over time (HR per 10 mg/L/month faster increase in CRP levels = 13.26, 95% CI: 1.14&ndash, 154.54, p = 0.039) were strong predictors of an elevated progression risk, whereas an early decline of CRP was significantly associated with a reduction in PFS risk (HR = 0.91, 95% CI: 0.83&ndash, 0.99, p = 0.036), respectively. Conclusion: These findings support the concept that CRP should be further explored by future prospective studies as a simple non-invasive biomarker for assessing treatment benefit during anti PD-(L)1 treatment in advanced NSCLC.

Clinical stage I (CSI) nonseminoma (NS) is a disease limited to the testis without metastases. One treatment strategy after orchiectomy is adjuvant chemotherapy. Little is known about the outcome of patients who experience relapse after such treatment.

PURPOSE Clinical stage I (CSI) nonseminoma (NS) is a disease limited to the testis without metastases. One treatment strategy after orchiectomy is adjuvant chemotherapy. Little is known about the outcome of patients who experience relapse after such treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS Data from 51 patients with CSI NS who experienced a relapse after adjuvant bleomycin, etoposide, and cisplatin (BEP) from 18 centers/11 countries were collected and retrospectively analyzed. Primary outcomes were overall and progression-free survivals calculated from day 1 of treatment at first relapse. Secondary outcomes were time to, stage at, and treatment of relapse and rate of subsequent relapses. RESULTS Median time to relapse was 13 months, with the earliest relapse 2 months after start of adjuvant treatment and the latest after 25 years. With a median follow-up of 96 months, the 5-year PFS was 67% (95% CI, 54% to 82%) and the 5-year OS was 81% (95% CI, 70% to 94%). Overall, 19 (37%) of 51 relapses occurred later than 2 years. Late relapses were associated with a significantly higher risk of death from NS (hazard ratio, 1.10 per year; P = .01). Treatment upon relapse was diverse: the majority of patients received a combination of chemotherapy and surgery. Twenty-nine percent of patients experienced a subsequent relapse. At last followup, 41 patients (80%) were alive and disease-free, eight (16%) had died of progressive disease, and one patient (2%) each had died from therapy-related or other causes. CONCLUSION Outcomes of patients with relapse after adjuvant BEP seem better compared with patients who experience relapse after treatment of metastatic disease but worse compared with those who have de-novo metastatic disease. We found a substantial rate of late and subsequent relapses. There seem to be three patterns of relapse with different outcomes: pure teratoma, early viable NS relapse (, 2 years), and late viable NS relapse (. 2 years). © 2019 by American Society of Clinical Oncology

The aim of this study was to detect risk factors for febrile neutropenia (FN) in patients with testicular germ cell tumors (TGCT). In this retrospective cohort study at the Medical University of Graz, we included 413 consecutive TGCT patients who received adjuvant or curative treatment with cisplatin‐based chemotherapy. FN occurred in 70 (16.9%) of 413 patients. In univariable logistic regression, higher age (odds ratio (OR) per 5 years = 1.17, 95% CI: 1.02–1.35, P = 0.022), reduced performance status (PS) (OR = 2.73, 1.47–5.06, P = 0.001), seminomatous histology (OR = 2.19, 1.26–3.78, P = 0.005), poor IGCCCG risk class (OR = 4.20, 1.71–10.33, P = 0.002), and prior radiotherapy (pRTX) (OR = 8.98, 2.09–38.61, P = 0.003) were associated with a higher risk of FN. In multivariable analysis adjusting for age and risk classification, only poor PS (OR = 2.06, 1.05–4.03, P = 0.035), seminomatous histology (OR = 2.08, 1.01–4.26, P = 0.047), and pRTX (OR = 7.31, 1.61–33.17, P = 0.010) prevailed. In the subgroup of seminoma patients (n = 104), only pRTX predicted for FN risk (OR = 5.60, 1.24–25.34, P = 0.025). Five of eight seminoma patients with pRTX developed FN (63%), as compared to 22 FN cases (23%) in the 96 seminoma patients without pRTX (P = 0.027). The eight seminoma patients who received pRTX had significantly lower pre‐chemo white blood counts (4.7 vs. 6.5 G/L), neutrophil counts (3.2 vs. 4.3 G/L), and platelet counts (185 vs. 272 G/L) than patients without pRTX (all P

Background: Preclinical experiments in-vitro show MEK inhibitors can cause upregulation of p-FAK in KRASM cells. The combination of a MEK and FAK inhibitor could overcome this in-vitro and in-vivo. Methods: We are conducting an open label phase I dose escalation with expansion study (NCT03875820). Dose escalation evaluated a twice a week schedule (Mon/Thurs) CH5126766/VS-6766 (CH) 3 weeks out of 4 with a twice a day dosing schedule of defactinib (Def) administered 3 weeks out of 4. The dose levels explored were cohort 1 (CH 3.2 mg, 200 mg Def), cohort 2a (CH 4 mg Def 200 mg) and cohort 2b (CH 3.2 mg and Def 400 mg). Pharmacokinetic data were collected at cycle 1 d15 when both drugs were administered. In a subset of patients consenting to multiple biopsies, 3 biopsies were performed (baseline, after a single dose of CH run in and after 8-15 days of the combination therapy). At the recommended phase 2 dose (R2PD), expansion cohorts in patients with low grade ovarian cancer (LGSOC, n=20), KRASM non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC, n=20) and KRASM colorectal cancer (CRC, n=10) will be treated. Results: Forty two patients have been treated on the trial so far. There were no dose limiting toxicities (DLTs) in the first 3 patients in cohort 1 and thus patients were recruited to cohort 2a and 2b. The cohort 2b dose level was deemed intolerable because of 2/3 patients experiencing DLTs of grade 2 rash not allowing dosing of 75% of the planned dose. No DLTs were seen in the first 6 patients treated on schedule 2a. However, given chronic grade 2 toxicities in patients on treatment > 6 months, the RP2D was deemed to be cohort 1. The most common side effects in the study were rash, CK elevation, AST elevation, hyperbilirubinemia and nausea, most of which were NCI CTC grade 1-2. All changes were reversible. The mean AUC of CH and Def at R2PD was 6179 ng*hr/ml and 2071 ng*hr/ml, respectively, which is in the range of what was seen in the single agent dose escalation studies. Sequential biopsies were obtained in 7 patients and 6/7 showed an increase in p-FAK following single agent CH which was reduced in 5/7 with combined CH and Def therapy. The response rate was 67% (4/6) or 50% (4/8) in KRASM LGSOC or all LGSOC patients treated to date, respectively. A range of KRASM were found in tumors of LGSOC patients who responded (G12V, G12A and G12D). Of the 4 patients with LGSOC who have responded to treatment, 3 have had a prior MEK inhibitor and are currently are on study for a median of 20.5 months (range 7-23 months). Expansion cohorts in LGSOC and KRASM NSCLC and CRC are ongoing and will be presented. Conclusion: We report a novel intermittent schedule of the combination of a RAF-MEK and FAK inhibitor with very promising clinical activity in patients with KRASM LGSOC including those who had been previously treated with a MEK inhibitor. Citation Format: Rajiv Shinde, Angelika Terbuch, Martin Little, Reece Caldwell, Roopa Kurup, Ruth Riisnaes, Mateus Crespo, Ruth Ruddle, Bora Gurel, Adam Stewart, Jenny King, Mona Parmar, Alison Turner, Florence Raynaud, Muneeb Mahmud, Christina Yap, Jonathan A. Pachter, Gordon B. Mills, Anna Minchom, Juanita Lopez, Susana N. Banerjee, Johann S. de Bono, Matthew Krebs, Udai Banerji. Phase I study of the combination of a RAF-MEK inhibitor CH5126766 and FAK inhibitor defactinib in an intermittent dosing schedule with expansions in KRAS mutant cancers [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research 2020; 2020 Apr 27-28 and Jun 22-24. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(16 Suppl):Abstract nr CT143.

BACKGROUND/AIM To quantify the prognostic impact of age on relapse and mortality in patients with metastatic testicular germ cell tumors (TGCT). PATIENTS AND METHODS Electronical medical records of 1,225 TGCT patients who were treated at a single academic center between 1994 and 2015 were reviewed. RESULTS Higher age did not predict for worse progression-free survival (PFS) or for higher progression risk. The corresponding 5-year PFS estimates were 85% in patients younger than 40 years and 83% in the elderly population. Although not statistically significant, higher age was numerically associated with worse overall survival (OS) (univariate HR per five years increase in age=1.18, 95%CI=0.99-1.41). This was explained in regression analysis where age predicted for significantly higher risk of treatment-related death (p=0.022). CONCLUSION Elderly patients with metastatic TGCT can achieve high cure rates similar to younger patients if they tolerate risk-adapted chemotherapy.

Background In men with castration-sensitive prostate cancer (CSPC), the HSD3B1 c.1245A>C variant has been reported to be associated with shorter responses to first-line androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT). Here, we evaluated the association between the inherited HSD3B1 c.1245A>C variant and outcomes from metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) after first-line treatment with abiraterone (Abi) or enzalutamide (Enza). Patients and methods Patients with mCRPC (n = 266) were enrolled from two centers at the time of starting first-line Abi/Enza. Outcomes after Abi/Enza included best prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response, treatment duration, and overall survival (OS). Outcomes after first-line ADT were determined retrospectively, and included treatment duration and OS. As was prespecified, we compared patients with the homozygous variant HSD3B1 genotype (CC genotype) versus the combined group with the heterozygous (AC) and homozygous wild-type (AA) genotypes. Results Among the 266 patients, 22 (8.3%) were homozygous for the HSD3B1 variant (CC). The CC genotype had no association with PSA response rate; the median Abi/Enza treatment duration was 7.1 months for the CC group and 10.3 months for the AA/AC group (log rank P = 0.34). Patients with the CC genotype had significantly worse OS, with median survival at 23.6 months for the CC group and 30.7 months for the AA/AC group (log rank P = 0.02). In multivariable analysis adjusting for age, Gleason score, PSA, prior chemotherapy, and M1 disease, the association between the CC genotype and OS remained significant (hazard ratio 1.78, 95% confidence interval 1.03–3.07, P = 0.04). Poor outcome after first-line ADT in the CC group was also observed when evaluating retrospective ADT duration data for the same combined cohort. Conclusions In this large two-center study evaluating the HSD3B1 c.1245 genotype and outcomes after first-line Abi/Enza, homozygous variant (CC) HSD3B1 genotype was associated with worse outcomes. Novel therapeutic strategies are needed to enable treatment selection based on this genetic marker.

We aimed to evaluate the performance of the Khorana score in predicting venous thromboembolic events in ambulatory cancer patients. Embase and MEDLINE were searched from January 2008 to June 2018 for studies which evaluated the Khorana score. Two authors independently screened studies for eligibility, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias. Additional data on the 6-month incidence of venous thromboembolism were sought by contacting corresponding authors. The incidence in each Khorana score risk group was estimated with random effects meta-analysis. A total of 45 articles and eight abstracts were included, comprising 55 cohorts enrolling 34,555 ambulatory cancer patients. For 27,849 patients (81%), 6-month follow-up data were obtained. Overall, 19% of patients had a Khorana score of 0 points, 64% a score of 1 or 2 points, and 17% a score of 3 or more points. The incidence of venous thromboembolism in the first six months was 5.0% (95% CI: 3.9-6.5) in patients with a low-risk Khorana score (0 points), 6.6% (95% CI: 5.6-7.7) in those with an intermediate-risk Khorana score (1 or 2 points), and 11.0% (95% CI: 8.8-13.8) in those with a high-risk Khorana score (3 points or higher). Of the patients with venous thromboembolism in the first six months, 23.4% (95% CI: 18.4-29.4) had been classified as high risk according to the Khorana score. In conclusion, the Khorana score can be used to select ambulatory cancer patients at high risk of venous thromboembolism for thromboprophylaxis; however, most events occur outside this high-risk group.

We aimed to evaluate the performance of the Khorana score in predicting venous thromboembolic events in ambulatory cancer patients. Embase and MEDLINE were searched from January 2008 to June 2018 for studies which evaluated the Khorana score. Two authors independently screened studies for eligibility, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias. Additional data on the 6-month incidence of venous thromboembolism were sought by contacting corresponding authors. The incidence in each Khorana score risk group was estimated with random effects meta-analysis. A total of 45 articles and eight abstracts were included, comprising 55 cohorts enrolling 34,555 ambulatory cancer patients. For 27,849 patients (81%), 6-month follow-up data were obtained. Overall, 19% of patients had a Khorana score of 0 points, 64% a score of 1 or 2 points, and 17% a score of 3 or more points. The incidence of venous thromboembolism in the first six months was 5.0% (95% CI: 3.9-6.5) in patients with a low-risk Khorana score (0 points), 6.6% (95% CI: 5.6-7.7) in those with an intermediate-risk Khorana score (1 or 2 points), and 11.0% (95% CI: 8.8-13.8) in those with a high-risk Khorana score (3 points or higher). Of the patients with venous thromboembolism in the first six months, 23.4% (95% CI: 18.4-29.4) had been classified as high risk according to the Khorana score. In conclusion, the Khorana score can be used to select ambulatory cancer patients at high risk of venous thromboembolism for thromboprophylaxis; however, most events occur outside this high-risk group.

3088 Background: We studied clinical and radiological parameters influencing DIP in patients (pts) participating in phase I clinical trials, aiming to investigate predictive factors affecting DIP, in particular those affecting outcome. Methods: 2439 consecutive stage IV cancer pts on phase I clinical trials from 2007 to 2017 were identified. Pts with respiratory symptoms or abnormal lung imaging were reviewed in detail, with longitudinal analysis of imaging by an experienced radiologist. R-DIP was categorized according to internationally recognized criteria. Results: 60 pts developed R-DIP (overall incidence 2.5%); most frequent in pts receiving drug conjugates (31.1%) followed by targeted therapies (8.3%). Hypersensitivity pneumonitis was most common (33.3%) followed by non-specific interstitial pneumonitis (30%) and cryptogenic organising pneumonitis (26.7%). 45% pts who developed R-DIP were clinically asymptomatic. The number of affected lobes (OR 1.47, 95% CI: 1.19-1.81, p < 0.001) and the pattern of R-DIP (OR 5.83 for ARDS, 95% CI: 0.38-90.26, p = 0.002) were significantly associated with a higher CTCAE pneumonitis grading. 23% pts (14/60) had investigational medicinal product (IMP) temporarily discontinued or had a dose reduction while 42% pts (25/60) had IMP permanently discontinued. 48% pts were treated with steroids. The number of affected lobes, pattern of R-DIP and steroid therapy did not influence an improvement in R-DIP (p = 0.65, 0.27 and 0.23 respectively). Continuation of treatment resulted in worsening of DIP in 42.9% of cases. The only predictive factor for an improvement in DIP was an interruption of treatment (OR 0.05, 95% CI: 0.01-0.35, p = 0.01). 14 pts were retreated with a reoccurrence of R-DIP in 4 pts (28.6%). Conclusions: R-DIP from novel agents in early phase clinical trials presents in varied radiological patterns, with findings often preceding clinical symptoms. Treatment interruption leads to improvement of DIP and should be considered early. Close clinical and radiological surveillance is recommended should IMP be restarted.

3007 Background: The ATR kinase is a key regulator of the DNA damage response (DDR) machinery, activated by DNA damage and replication stress. BAY 1895344 is a novel, potent, and selective ATR inhibitor with anti-tumor activity in preclinical models with DDR defects. Methods: Pts with advanced metastatic solid tumors resistant or refractory to standard treatment, with and without DDR defects, received BAY 1895344 BID, 3 days (d) on/4 d off continuously in 3-weekly cycles. Results: As of December 20, 2018, 18 pts with colorectal (4), breast (3), prostate (2), and ovarian (2) cancers were enrolled across 6 cohorts (5 mg, 10 mg, 20 mg, 40 mg, 60 mg, and 80 mg BID). Median prior lines of treatment was 5. No dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were reported in the 5-40 mg cohorts. 2/3 pts had DLTs in the 80 mg cohort (grade [G] 4 neutropenia, G4 neutropenia and G4 thrombocytopenia) and 2/7 had DLTs in the 60 mg cohort (G4 neutropenia, G2 fatigue). 40 mg BID 3 on/4 off was defined as the maximum tolerated dose. Most common treatment-emergent adverse events included anemia, neutropenia, nausea, and fatigue. Pharmacokinetics appeared dose proportional. Pharmacodynamic analyses showed modulation of pH2AX and/or pKAP1 in paired tumor biopsies at exposures associated with preclinical anti-tumor activity. In 13 pts with and without DDR defects treated at dose levels ≥40 mg BID, the objective response rate was 30.7%, including 2/2 pts at 40 mg (appendix and urothelial cancer), 1/8 pts at 60 mg (breast), and 1/3 pts at 80 mg (endometrial). All responders had ATM protein loss of expression and/or ATM mutation; median treatment duration was 347 d (range 293-364 d). A BRCA1-mutant, olaparib-resistant ovarian cancer pt (60 mg) had a CA125 response and stable disease >10 months. 41 additional pts have been enrolled in ongoing expansion cohorts in cancers with DDR defects (prostate, breast, gynecologic, colorectal) or ATM protein loss (all comers) with responses observed. Conclusions: The ATR inhibitor BAY 1895344 is tolerated at biologically active doses with anti-tumor activity against cancers with certain DDR defects, including ATM protein loss. Clinical trial information: NCT03188965.

510 Background: Clin. stage I (CSI) non-seminoma (NS) is disease limited to the testis without metastases. One treatment strategy after orchiectomy is adjuvant (adjuv) chemotherapy with BEP after which relapses are rare. Little is known about the outcome of patients (pts) relapsing after such treatment. Methods: Data from 51 pts with CSI NS and relapse after adjuv BEP from 18 centers/11 countries was collected and retrospectively analyzed. Primary endpoints were OS and PFS calculated from start of treatment of relapse. Secondary outcomes were time to, stage at, and treatment of relapse as well as rate of subsequent relapses. Results: 23 pts received one cycle adjuv BEP and 28 pts two. Median time to relapse was 13 months, with the earliest relapse two months after start of adjuv BEP and the latest relapse recorded after 26 years. According to IGCCCG, 84% of pts classified as good prognosis at relapse. With a median follow up of 50 months 5y PFS was 64% (95% CI 52-80%) and 5y OS 79% (95% CI 68-92%). Treatment upon relapse was diverse, the majority of pts received combination- chemotherapy and surgery. 10 pts (20%) had pure mature teratoma at relapse treated with surgery alone. None of these pts experienced a second relapse. If teratoma relapses were excluded, 5y PFS dropped to 58% (44-77%) and 5y OS to 76% (63-92%). Relapses later than three years after adjuv therapy occured in 15/51 pts. (29%) and were associated with a statistically significant higher risk of death from germ-cell cancer (p=0.02). 15/51 pts (29%) experienced a subsequent relapse. Excluding pts with teratoma only, subsequent relapses occured in 15 of the remaining 41 pts (37%). At last follow-up, 41/51 (80%) pts were alive and disease-free, 8/51 (16%) had died from progressive disease and one pt each had died from therapy-related or other causes. Conclusions: Outcome of pts with relapse after adjuv BEP seems to be better compared to pts with relapse after metastatic disease, but worse compared to de novo metastatic pts. There is a substantial rate of late and subsequent relapses. Pts and care-takers need to be informed about this and therapy intensification at first relapse might be considered. However, considering the low rate of relapses, OS in general for CSI NS pts receiving adjuv BEP is excellent.