Search

9513Background: In KEYNOTE-006 (NCT01866319), pembro (MK-3475) provided superior OS and PFS and a lower grade 3-5 treatment-related AE rate over ipi in patients (pts) with advanced melanoma and ≤ 1 prior therapy. We assessed the impact of PD-L1 expression and prior therapy on outcomes in KEYNOTE-006. Methods: Pts were randomized to pembro 10 mg/kg Q2W or Q3W or ipi 3 mg/kg Q3W. Pembro was given for 24 mo or until progression, intolerable toxicity, or investigator decision. Ipi was given for 4 cycles or until progression, intolerable toxicity, or investigator decision. PD-L1 was assessed by IHC using the 22C3 antibody; positivity was defined as ≥ 1% staining in tumor and adjacent immune cells. Response was assessed at wk 12, Q6W until wk 48, then Q12W. Survival follow-up was every 12 wk. Primary end points were OS and PFS (RECIST v1.1, central review). Data cutoff date was Mar 3, 2015. Pembro arms were pooled for this analysis. Results: Of the 834 pts enrolled, 80% were PD-L1+, 18% were PD-L1–, and 2% were...

Summary Background Dabrafenib is an inhibitor of BRAF kinase that is selective for mutant BRAF. We aimed to assess its safety and tolerability and to establish a recommended phase 2 dose in patients with incurable solid tumours, especially those with melanoma and untreated, asymptomatic brain metastases. Methods We undertook a phase 1 trial between May 27, 2009, and March 20, 2012, at eight study centres in Australia and the USA. Eligible patients had incurable solid tumours, were 18 years or older, and had adequate organ function. BRAF mutations were mandatory for inclusion later in the study because of an absence of activity in patients with wild-type BRAF. We used an accelerated dose titration method, with the first dose cohort receiving 12 mg dabrafenib daily in a 21-day cycle. Once doses had been established, we expanded the cohorts to include up to 20 patients. On the basis of initial data, we chose a recommended phase 2 dose. Efficacy at the recommended phase 2 dose was studied in patients with BRAF-mutant tumours, including those with non-Val600Glu mutations, in three cohorts: metastatic melanoma, melanoma with untreated brain metastases, and non-melanoma solid tumours. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00880321. Findings We enrolled 184 patients, of whom 156 had metastatic melanoma. The most common treatment-related adverse events of grade 2 or worse were cutaneous squamous-cell carcinoma (20 patients, 11%), fatigue (14, 8%), and pyrexia (11, 6%). Dose reductions were necessary in 13 (7%) patients. No deaths or discontinuations resulted from adverse events, and 140 (76%) patients had no treatment-related adverse events worse than grade 2. Doses were increased to 300 mg twice daily, with no maximum tolerated dose recorded. On the basis of safety, pharmacokinetic, and response data, we selected a recommended phase 2 dose of 150 mg twice daily. At the recommended phase 2 dose in 36 patients with Val600 BRAF-mutant melanoma, responses were reported in 25 (69%, 95% CI 51·9–83·7) and confirmed responses in 18 (50%, 32·9–67·1). 21 (78%, 57·7–91·4) of 27 patients with Val600Glu BRAF-mutant melanoma responded and 15 (56%, 35·3–74·5) had a confirmed response. In Val600 BRAF-mutant melanoma, responses were durable, with 17 patients (47%) on treatment for more than 6 months. Responses were recorded in patients with non-Val600Glu BRAF mutations. In patients with melanoma and untreated brain metastases, nine of ten patients had reductions in size of brain lesions. In 28 patients with BRAF-mutant non-melanoma solid tumours, apparent antitumour activity was noted in a gastrointestinal stromal tumour, papillary thyroid cancers, non-small-cell lung cancer, ovarian cancer, and colorectal cancer. Interpretation Dabrafenib is safe in patients with solid tumours, and an active inhibitor of Val600-mutant BRAF with responses noted in patients with melanoma, brain metastases, and other solid tumours. Funding GlaxoSmithKline.

Recombinant human granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (rhGM-CSF) clearly hastens myeloid recovery in patients with relapsed hematologic malignancies undergoing autologous bone marrow transplantation (ABMT). In efforts to further improve neutrophil engraftment and shorten hospital stay in ABMT patients, rhGM-CSF was administered by a potentially more potent route (continuous infusion) to non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) patients with better BM reserve (first remission). Time to myeloid engraftment was compared with that of NHL patients treated in first remission at our institution on a similar ABMT protocol but without growth factor support (controls). Median neutrophil engraftment (absolute neutrophil count, 500 cells/microL) in first remission patients treated with rhGM-CSF was 14 days, compared with 22 days in controls (P = .0001). Hospital stays were also significantly reduced for rhGM-CSF patients (P = .0003). Platelet engraftment did not differ between the two groups. Persistent fever and generalized serositis were the primary toxicities. rhGM-CSF, delivered by this route, was efficacious but more toxic than 2-hour rhGM-CSF infusions previously reported by other investigators. Future alterations in both dose and schedule may retain comparable efficacy yet diminish toxicity.

The field of melanoma therapeutics has experienced a dramatic paradigm shift over the last 12 months through recent discoveries of novel therapeutics targeting known oncogenes and immunotherapeutic antibodies. In this article, we review these findings and provide a framework to understand these discoveries, their significance in melanoma therapy, and role in clinical care. As this understanding grows, enduring therapeutic success may be achieved through tailored use of molecular markers and immunotherapies in sequential or combinatorial methods.

A B S T R AC T Background Ipilimumab monotherapy (at a dose of 3 mg per kilogram of body weight), as compared with glycoprotein 100, improved overall survival in a phase 3 study involving patients with previously treated metastatic melanoma. We conducted a phase 3 study of ipilimumab (10 mg per kilogram) plus dacarbazine in patients with previously untreated metastatic melanoma. Methods We randomly assigned 502 patients with previously untreated metastatic melanoma, in a 1:1 ratio, to ipilimumab (10 mg per kilogram) plus dacarbazine (850 mg per square meter of body-surface area) or dacarbazine (850 mg per square meter) plus placebo, given at weeks 1, 4, 7, and 10, followed by dacarbazine alone every 3 weeks through week 22. Patients with stable disease or an objective response and no doselimiting toxic effects received ipilimumab or placebo every 12 weeks thereafter as maintenance therapy. The primary end point was overall survival. Results Overall survival was significantly longer in the group receiving ipilimumab plus dacarbazine than in the group receiving dacarbazine plus placebo (11.2 months vs. 9.1 months, with higher survival rates in the ipilimumab–dacarbazine group at 1 year (47.3% vs. 36.3%), 2 years (28.5% vs. 17.9%), and 3 years (20.8% vs. 12.2%) (hazard ratio for death, 0.72; P

Background: αv integrins are involved in angiogenesis and melanoma tumourigenesis. Intetumumab (CNTO 95) is a fully human anti-αv-integrin monoclonal antibody.Methods:In a multicentre, randomised, phase II study, stage IV melanoma patients were randomised 1: 1: 1: 1 to 1000 mg m² dacarbazineplacebo (n32), 1000 mg m² dacarbazine10 mg kg¹ intetumumab (n32), 10 mg kg¹ intetumumab (n33), or 5 mg kg¹ intetumumab (n32) q3w. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), adverse events, and pharmacokinetics.Results:No statistically significant differences in efficacy were observed between groups. In the dacarbazineplacebo, dacarbazineintetumumab, 10 mg kg¹ intetumumab, and 5 mg kg¹ intetumumab groups, median PFS was 1.8, 2.5, 1.4, and 1.4 months; median OS was 8, 11, 15, and 9.8 months; and ORR of completepartial response was 10, 3, 6, and 0%. Nonlinear intetumumab pharmacokinetics and potential intetumumab-dacarbazine interactions were observed. Transient, asymptomatic, nonrecurring, grade 1-2, uveitic reactions that resolved spontaneously or with topical steroids were seen in 22-30% of intetumumab-treated patients. Low-grade infusion-reaction symptoms (headache, fatigue, nausea, vomiting, fever, chills) were observed, as expected, in 16-73% of dacarbazine-treated patients. No intetumumab-related myelosuppression, laboratory/electrocardiogram abnormalities, or deaths occurred. Conclusion: With its favourable safety profile and a nonsignificant trend towards improved OS, intetumumab merits further investigation in advanced melanoma. © 2011 Cancer Research UK All rights reserved.

Ipilimumab is a fully human, monoclonal antibody that blocks cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4 to potentiate an antitumor T-cell response. This agent improved overall survival in a phase III trial in previously treated patients with advanced melanoma. Because the mechanism of action for ipilimumab is thought to be HLA independent, most trials enrolled patients without regard to HLA subtype. However, enrollment in the phase III trial was restricted to class-I HLA-A*0201-positive patients because two of the three arms contained an HLA-A*0201-restricted gp100 vaccine. HLA typing was also performed prospectively in several phase II trials and was available for 93.5% of patients. In this retrospective analysis, pooled efficacy and safety data are presented according to HLA-A*0201 status and dose from pretreated patients randomized to 0.3, 3, or 10 mg/kg ipilimumab in four phase II trials. Median overall survival (OS) was similar for the 187 HLA-A*0201-positive [9.3 months, 95% CI (confidence interval) 7.4-11.5] and 266 HLA-A*0201-negative patients [11.4 months, 95% CI 9.3-15.1] randomized to ipilimumab at all doses across the four phase II trials. These data are comparable to the OS for the 137 HLA-A*0201-positive patients randomized to ipilimumab in the phase III study [10.1 months, 95% CI 8.0-13.8]. Ipilimumab-induced adverse events and immune-related adverse events (skin, gastrointestinal, hepatic, other) also occurred at similar frequencies among patients in the phase II and III trials, regardless of HLA-A*0201 status. These findings support the hypothesis that ipilimumab-treated patients with advanced melanoma have similar outcomes regardless of their HLA-A*0201 status.

BACKGROUND: Imexon (Amplimexon) is an aziridine compound that increases reactive oxygen species, disrupts mitochondrial membranes, and induces apoptosis. Preclinical studies showed activity against melanoma cell lines and models in mice, and synergy with dacarbazine. The authors evaluated standard doses of dacarbazine combined with increasing doses of imexon to determine the maximal tolerated dose (MTD), toxicities, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy. METHODS: Sixty-eight chemotherapy-naive melanoma patients (1 inoperable stage III and 67 stage IV) were treated with dacarbazine (250 mg/m2) and imexon (570-1300 mg/m2), both daily for 5 days every 3 weeks. RESULTS: There were 18 patients in the phase 1, and 50 in the phase 2 component of the study. The MTD of imexon with dacarbazine was 1000 mg/m2. Dose-limiting toxicities were pulmonary edema and hepatorenal failure. At the MTD, therapy was well tolerated. The most common toxicities (any grade) were vomiting, diarrhea, anemia, thrombocytopenia, anorexia, fever, and constipation. Among 68 patients, there were 7 treatment-related serious adverse events. Partial response and stable disease rates were 5.9% and 25% for all subjects and 2% and 30% for the phase 2 patients, respectively. Median progression-free and overall survival of all patients were 2.0 and 11.7 months and 2 and 7.5 months for the phase 2 patients, respectively. Overall survival of the 31 patients with normal lactate dehydrogenase levels was >22.5 months. Pharmacokinetics of both drugs were similar to previous reports. CONCLUSIONS: Imexon plus dacarbazine was well tolerated. The survival data suggest further evaluation in a randomized phase 2 study. Cancer 2010. © 2010 American Cancer Society.

Background An improvement in overall survival among patients with metastatic melanoma has been an elusive goal. In this phase 3 study, ipilimumab — which blocks cytotoxic T-lymphocyte–associated antigen 4 to potentiate an antitumor T-cell response — administered with or without a glycoprotein 100 (gp100) peptide vaccine was compared with gp100 alone in patients with previously treated metastatic melanoma. Methods A total of 676 HLA-A*0201–positive patients with unresectable stage III or IV melanoma, whose disease had progressed while they were receiving therapy for metastatic disease, were randomly assigned, in a 3:1:1 ratio, to receive ipilimumab plus gp100 (403 patients), ipilimumab alone (137), or gp100 alone (136). Ipilimumab, at a dose of 3 mg per kilogram of body weight, was administered with or without gp100 every 3 weeks for up to four treatments (induction). Eligible patients could receive reinduction therapy. The primary end point was overall survival. Results The median overall survival was 10.0 months among patients receiving ipilimumab plus gp100, as compared with 6.4 months among patients receiving gp100 alone (hazard ratio for death, 0.68; P

Purpose: Molecular biomarkers in blood are promising for assessment of tumor progression and treatment response. We hypothesized that serial monitoring of circulating tumor cells (CTC) with the use of multimarker quantitative real-time reverse transcriptase-PCR assays could be a surrogate predictor of outcome for melanoma patients enrolled in a multicenter phase II clinical trial of biochemotherapy (BCT) combined with maintenance biotherapy (mBT). Experimental Design: Blood specimens were collected from 87 patients before and during induction BCT and mBT for stage IV melanoma. Expression of five melanoma-associated CTC biomarkers (MART-1, GalNAc-T, PAX-3, MAGE-A3, and Mitf) was assessed by quantitative real-time reverse transcriptase-PCR, and correlated with treatment response and disease outcome. Results: The number of positive CTC biomarkers decreased overall during induction BCT (P < 0.0001). CTC biomarker detection after two cycles of BCT was correlated with treatment response (P = 0.005) and overall survival (P = 0.001): an increase in the number of CTC biomarkers was associated with poor response (P = 0.006) and overall survival (P < 0.0001). Multivariate analyses with the use of a Cox proportional hazards model identified the change in CTC biomarkers after two cycles of BCT as an independent prognostic factor for disease progression (risk ratio, 12.6; 95% confidence interval, 4.78-33.4; P < 0.0001) and overall survival (risk ratio, 6.11; 95% confidence interval, 2.37-15.7; P = 0.0005). Conclusion: Serial monitoring of CTC during induction BCT may be useful for predicting therapeutic efficacy and disease outcome in patients receiving BCT and mBT for stage IV melanoma. Clin Cancer Res; 16(8); 2402–8. ©2010 AACR.

Background: This phase II study evaluated the safety and activity of ipilimumab, a fully human mAb that blocks cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4, in patients with advanced melanoma. Patients and methods: Patients with previously treated, unresectable stage III/stage IV melanoma received 10 mg/kg ipilimumab every 3 weeks for four cycles (induction) followed by maintenance therapy every 3 months. The primary end point was best overall response rate (BORR) using modified World Health Organization (WHO) criteria. We also carried out an exploratory analysis of proposed immune-related response criteria (irRC). Results: BORR was 5.8% with a disease control rate (DCR) of 27% (N = 155). One-and 2-year survival rates (95% confidence interval) were 47.2% (39.5% to 55.1%) and 32.8% (25.4% to 40.5%), respectively, with a median overall survival of 10.2 months (7.6-16.3). Of 43 patients with disease progression by modified WHO criteria, 12 had disease control by irRC (8% of all treated patients), resulting in a total DCR of 35%. Adverse events (AEs) were largely immune related, occurring mainly in the skin and gastrointestinal tract, with 19% grade 3 and 3.2% grade 4. Immune-related AEs were manageable and generally reversible with corticosteroids. Conclusion: Ipilimumab demonstrated clinical activity with encouraging long-term survival in a previously treated advanced melanoma population. (Less)

Purpose: Immunotherapeutic agents produce antitumor effects by inducing cancer-specific immune responses or by modifying native immune processes. Resulting clinical response patterns extend beyond those of cytotoxic agents and can manifest after an initial increase in tumor burden or the appearance of new lesions (progressive disease). Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors or WHO criteria, designed to detect early effects of cytotoxic agents, may not provide a complete assessment of immunotherapeutic agents. Novel criteria for the evaluation of antitumor responses with immunotherapeutic agents are required. Experimental Design: The phase II clinical trial program with ipilimumab, an antibody that blocks CTL antigen-4, represents the most comprehensive data set available to date for an immunotherapeutic agent. Novel immune therapy response criteria proposed, based on the shared experience from community workshops and several investigators, were evaluated using data from ipilimumab phase II clinical trials in patients with advanced melanoma. Results: Ipilimumab monotherapy resulted in four distinct response patterns: (a) shrinkage in baseline lesions, without new lesions; (b) durable stable disease (in some patients followed by a slow, steady decline in total tumor burden); (c) response after an increase in total tumor burden; and (d) response in the presence of new lesions. All patterns were associated with favorable survival. Conclusion: Systematic criteria, designated immune-related response criteria, were defined in an attempt to capture additional response patterns observed with immune therapy in advanced melanoma beyond those described by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors or WHO criteria. Further prospective evaluations of the immune-related response criteria, particularly their association with overall survival, are warranted. (Clin Cancer Res 2009;15(23):7412–20)

PurposeBiochemotherapy improves responses in metastatic melanoma, but not overall survival, in randomized trials. We developed a maintenance biotherapy regimen after induction biochemotherapy in an attempt to improve durability of responses and overall survival.Patients and MethodsOne hundred thirty-three chemotherapy-naïve patients with metastatic melanoma without CNS metastases were treated at 10 melanoma centers. The biochemotherapy induction regimen included cisplatin, vinblastine, dacarbazine, decrescendo interleukin-2 (IL-2), and interferon alfa-2b with granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) cytokine support. Patients not experiencing disease progression were eligible for maintenance biotherapy with low-dose IL-2 and GM-CSF followed by intermittent pulses of decrescendo IL-2 over 12 months. Patients were observed for response, progression-free survival, toxicity, and overall survival.ResultsThe response rate to induction biochemotherapy was 44% (95% CI, 35% to 52%; complete response, 8%; partial response, 36%; stable disease, 29%). The median number of biochemotherapy cycles was four, and the median number of maintenance biotherapy cycles was five. The median progression-free survival was 9 months, and the median survival was 13.5 months. The 12-month and 24-month survival rates were 57% and 23%, respectively. Twenty percent of patients remain alive (12 without disease), with median follow-up of 30 months (95% CI, 25+ to 45+ months). Thirty-nine percent of patients developed CNS metastases. The median times to CNS progression and death were 8 months and 5 months, respectively.ConclusionMaintenance biotherapy after induction biochemotherapy seems to prolong progression-free survival and improve overall survival compared with recent multicenter trials of biochemotherapy or chemotherapy. The regimen should be studied in a randomized clinical trial in patients with advanced metastatic melanoma. CNS progression remains a formidable challenge.

BACKGROUND: nab-Paclitaxel (ABI-007, Abraxane), a 130-nM, albumin-bound (nab) particle form of Cremophor-free paclitaxel, is approved for metastatic breast cancer. In the current study, the efficacy and safety of nab-paclitaxel were evaluated in previously treated and chemotherapy-naive patients with metastatic melanoma (MM). METHODS: Patients with histologically or cytologically confirmed, measurable MM were enrolled. nab-Paclitaxel was administered intravenously weekly for 3 of 4 weeks at a dose of 100 mg/m2 (in previously treated patients) or 150 mg/m2 (in chemotherapy-naive patients). RESULTS: Thirty-seven patients were treated in each cohort. The response rate was 2.7% in the previously treated cohort and 21.6% in the chemotherapy-naive cohort; the response plus stable disease rate was 37.8% and 48.6% in the previously treated and chemotherapy-naive cohorts, respectively. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 3.5 months and 4.5 months, and the median survival was 12.1 months and 9.6 months, respectively. The probability of being alive and free of disease progression at 6 months was 27% for the previously treated cohort and 34% for the chemotherapy-naive cohort; the probability of surviving 1 year was 49% and 41%, respectively, for the previously treated and chemotherapy-naive cohorts. Approximately 78% of the previously treated patients and 49% of the chemotherapy-naive patients were treated without dose reduction. Eight (22%) chemotherapy-naive patients discontinued therapy because of toxicities. Drug-related toxicities included grade 3 to 4 (graded according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events [version 3.0]) neuropathy, alopecia, neutropenia, and fatigue. CONCLUSIONS: nab-Paclitaxel was found to be well tolerated and demonstrated activity in both previously treated and chemotherapy-naive patients with MM. The response rate, PFS, and survival compared favorably with current standard dacarbazine therapy and combination therapies for melanoma. nab-Paclitaxel therapy of MM should be investigated further in controlled clinical trials. Cancer 2010. © 2010 American Cancer Society.

Purpose Elesclomol is a novel, small-molecule, oxidative stress inducer believed to exert selective cytotoxicity by increasing intracellular concentrations of reactive oxygen species, which results in cell death via mitochondrial apoptosis. We evaluated whether the addition of elesclomol to weekly paclitaxel could improve efficacy in patients with stage IV metastatic melanoma. Patients and Methods We randomly assigned patients with metastatic melanoma, measurable disease, and one or fewer prior chemotherapy regimens to elesclomol 213 mg/m2 plus paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 (E + P) or to paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 alone at a 2:1 ratio; regimens were given as a 1-hour intravenous infusion weekly, during 3 of every 4 weeks until disease progression per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors or death occurred. Patients who experienced progression were unblended, and patients on paclitaxel alone were permitted to cross over to E + P. The primary efficacy end point was progression-free survival (PFS); secondary end points were response rate (RR), toxicity, and overall survival (OS; analyzed post hoc). Results At 21 US sites, 53 patients were randomly assigned to E + P, and 28 patients were randomly assigned to paclitaxel. The addition of elesclomol to paclitaxel yielded a doubling of median PFS (112 v 56 days) and a 41.7% risk reduction for disease progression/death (hazard ratio, 0.583; P = .035). Respective RRs for the E + P and paclitaxel groups were 15% and 3%; median OS was 11.9 v 7.8 months. Of patients on paclitaxel alone, 19 (68%) of 28 crossed over to E + P after they experienced progression. Weekly E + P was well tolerated. Conclusion E + P resulted in a statistically significant doubling of median PFS, with an acceptable toxicity profile and encouraging OS. A multinational, phase III trial (SYMMETRY) of E + P compared with paclitaxel alone in metastatic melanoma has closed.

BACKGROUND: There are currently no systemic treatments for stage IV melanoma, which have been proven in randomized trials to benefit overall survival (OS). Lenalidomide has efficacy against melanoma in animal models and safety in phase 1 trials. The authors reported the results of a phase 2/3 study comparing the safety and efficacy of 2 doses of lenalidomide in patients with relapsed metastatic melanoma disease refractory to previous treatment with dacarbazine, temozolomide, interleukin-2, or interferon-α. METHODS: A total of 294 patients were randomized to oral lenalidomide at 5 mg or 25 mg dose. Tumor response, time to progression, and OS were evaluated. Treatment continued until disease progression or unacceptable adverse events. RESULTS: No significant differences in response rate, OS, or time to progression were observed between lenalidomide 25 mg versus 5 mg (overall response rate: 5.5% vs 3.4%, P = .38; median OS: 6.8 months vs 7.2 months, P = .71; and median time to progression: 2.2 months vs 1.9 months, P = .24). Myelosuppression was observed in 37.0% of patients in the 25 mg group and 13.7% of patients in the 5 mg group. Treatment-related serious adverse events were seen in 39.0% of patients at the 25 mg dose and 35.4% of patients at the 5 mg dose. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the occurrence of treatment-related serious adverse events, ∼80% of patients continued treatment. The higher dose of lenalidomide did not improve response rate, time to progression, or OS of patients with relapsed/refractory stage IV melanoma. A parallel placebo-controlled study has been conducted to further assess the efficacy of lenalidomide in stage IV melanoma patients. Cancer 2009. © 2009 American Cancer Society.

Purpose: Diarrhea (with or without colitis) is an immune-related adverse event (irAE) associated with ipilimumab. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter, multinational phase II trial was conducted to determine whether prophylactic budesonide (Entocort EC), a nonabsorbed oral steroid, reduced the rate of grade ≥2 diarrhea in ipilimumab-treated patients with advanced melanoma. Experimental Design: Previously treated and treatment-naïve patients (N = 115) with unresectable stage III or IV melanoma received open-label ipilimumab (10 mg/kg every 3 weeks for four doses) with daily blinded budesonide (group A) or placebo (group B) through week 16. The first scheduled tumor evaluation was at week 12; eligible patients received maintenance treatment starting at week 24. Diarrhea was assessed using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) 3.0. Patients kept a diary describing their bowel habits. Results: Budesonide did not affect the rate of grade ≥2 diarrhea, which occurred in 32.7% and 35.0% of patients in groups A and B, respectively. There were no bowel perforations or treatment-related deaths. Best overall response rates were 12.1% in group A and 15.8% in group B, with a median overall survival of 17.7 and 19.3 months, respectively. Within each group, the disease control rate was higher in patients with grade 3 to 4 irAEs than in patients with grade 0 to 2 irAEs, although many patients with grade 1 to 2 irAEs experienced clinical benefit. Novel patterns of response to ipilimumab were observed. Conclusions: Ipilimumab shows activity in advanced melanoma, with encouraging survival and manageable adverse events. Budesonide should not be used prophylactically for grade ≥2 diarrhea associated with ipilimumab therapy. (Clin Cancer Res 2009;15(17):5591–8)

Background Metastatic melanoma is an incurable disease with an average survival of less than one year. Talabostat is a novel dipeptidyl peptidase inhibitor with immunostimulatory properties. Methods This phase II, open label, single arm study was conducted to evaluate the safety and efficacy of 75–100 mg/m2 cisplatin combined with 300–400 mcg talabostat bid for 6, 21-day cycles. The primary endpoint was overall response. The rate of complete responses, duration of overall objective response, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival were the secondary endpoints. Results Six objective partial responses were recorded in the 74 patients (8.1%) in the intention-to-treat population. Five of these responses involved the 40 evaluable patients (12.5%). Thirty-one percent of patients reported SAEs to the combination of talabostat and cisplatin. Conclusion Acceptable tolerability was observed in the intention-to-treat population and antitumor activity was observed in 12.5% of evaluable patients, which is not greater than historical expectation with cisplatin alone.

BACKGROUND: The primary objective of this phase 2 study was to assess the objective response rate (complete response [CR] þ partial responses [PR]), by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, of PF3512676, a CpG oligodeoxynucleotide, alone in 2 doses or in combination with dacarbazine (DTIC) in patients with unresectable stage IIIB/C or stage IV malignant melanoma, with the aim of selecting an arm to take forward to a phase 3 portion of the study. METHODS: A total of 184 patients were randomized to 1 of 4 treatments: PF-3512676 10 mg (low dose), at 40 mg (high dose), 40 mg plus DTIC (850 mg/m 2 ), or DTIC (850 mg/m 2 ) alone. Patients received PF-3512676 subcutaneously weekly in a 3-week cycle and received DTIC intravenously on the first week of the cycle. RESULTS: The objective response rate (PR or CR, confirmed or unconfirmed) in the 40 mg þ DTIC arm was 16% (7 patients) compared with 8% (3 patients) with DTIC alone. One (2%) patient in the 10-mg and 0 patients in the 40-mg arms achieved an objective response. Best response of CR or PR or stable disease (SD), with no minimum duration defined for SD, was achieved by 15 (33%) patients in the 40 mg þ DTIC arm, 15 (38%) patients in the DTIC-only arm, 8 (17%) patients in the 10-mg arm, and 9 (20%) patients in the 40-mg arm. The most frequently reported adverse events were classified as local injection site reactions or systemic flu-like symptoms, specifically fatigue, rigors, and pyrexia. CONCLUSIONS: PF-3512676 at the doses used was generally well tolerated. The modest objective response rates observed in all arms did not warrant continuation to the phase 3 portion of the study. Cancer 2009;115:3944–54. V C 2009 American Cancer Society.

Cancer immunotherapy centers on modulating the host's tumor-directed immune response. One promising approach involves augmentation of cell-mediated immunity by interrupting T-cell pathways responsible for immune down-regulation or tolerance. The discovery of cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4) and its role as a key negative regulator for T cells has prompted efforts to target this signaling molecule to improve cancer therapy. Activation, or 'priming', of naive T cells in response to tumor-cell invasion comprises a dual-signaling mechanism. Signal 1 requires tumor-associated antigen recognition by the T-cell receptor, while signal 2 occurs through binding of CD80 or CD86 (B7.1 of 2) on the antigen presenting cell (APC) with CD28 on the T cell. Importantly, there is a final step responsible for naturally occurring immune regulation; this occurs in response to competitive binding of CD80/CD86 on the APC by CTLA-4 on the T cell. This 'immune checkpoint' interrupts signal 2 and inhibits the activated T cell. Targeting CTLA-4 as an anticancer strategy: Following proof-of-concept studies in animals, fully human anti-CTLA-4 antibodies were developed and 2 are undergoing clinical evaluation. Ipilimumab and tremelimumab have shown promising antitumor activity, initially in patients with advanced melanoma. Class-specific immune-related adverse events (irAEs) were common and mostly transient and/or manageable. These events are thought to be mechanism-of-action-related, indicating immune tolerance is broken; this relation may also explain the association between irAEs and response seen in several trials. Interruption of immune inhibitory pathways via CTLA-4 blockade appears to be a promising strategy for cancer immunotherapy.

9040 Background: Pembrolizumab is approved for treating advanced MEL that progressed following IPI and, if BRAFV600 mutant, a BRAF inhibitor. In KEYNOTE-002 (NCT01704287), pembrolizumab significant...

The role of estrogen receptor α (ER-α) in melanoma is unknown. ER-α expression may be regulated in melanoma via hypermethylation of promoter CpG islands. We assessed ER-α hypermethylation in primary and metastatic melanomas and sera as a potential tumor progression marker. ER-α methylation status in tumor (n = 107) and sera (n = 109) from American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage I to IV melanoma patients was examined by methylation-specific PCR. The clinical significance of serum methylated ER-α was assessed among AJCC stage IV melanoma patients receiving biochemotherapy with tamoxifen. Rates of ER-α methylation in AJCC stage I, II, and III primary melanomas were 36% (4 of 11), 26% (5 of 19), and 35% (8 of 23), respectively. Methylated ER-α was detected in 42% (8 of 19) of stage III and 86% (30 of 35) of stage IV metastatic melanomas. ER-α was methylated more frequently in metastatic than primary melanomas (P = 0.0003). Of 109 melanoma patients' sera in AJCC stage I, II, III, and IV, methylated ER-α was detected in 10% (2 of 20), 15% (3 of 20), 26% (5 of 19), and 32% (16 of 50), respectively. Serum methylated ER-α was detected more frequently in advanced than localized melanomas (P = 0.03) and was the only factor predicting progression-free [risk ratio (RR), 2.64; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 1.36-5.13; P = 0.004] and overall survival (RR, 2.31; 95% CI, 1.41-5.58; P = 0.003) in biochemotherapy patients. Hypermethylated ER-α is a significant factor in melanoma progression. Serum methylated ER-α is an unfavorable prognostic factor. (Cancer Res 2006; 66(13): 6692-8)

Metastatic melanoma continues to be a very difficult disease to treat. Options are limited and often have very little impact on the course of the disease. The objective of the current study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of continuously administered Apomine (SR-45023A), a novel bisphosphonate, in patients with previously treated metastatic malignant melanoma. Adult patients with previously treated metastatic melanoma received Apomine 100 mg orally, twice daily (total dose 200 mg per day) continuously for 28 days (defined as a cycle). Treatment was continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. A total of 42 patients received at least one dose of Apomine. Stable disease was achieved in 2 patients (5%). No complete or partial responses were observed. Progression free survival of at least 16 weeks was observed in 6 patients (14%). The median overall survival was 6.1 months (95% CI, 4.9-9.4 months). Time to treatment failure was 1.7 months (95% CI, 1.6-1.8 months) with Apomine therapy. By cycle 2, Apomine concentrations reached steady-state. Apomine was well tolerated with only 37% of patients experiencing any drug-related event. Abdominal pain was the most frequent adverse event occurring in 26% of patients. In conclusion, Apomine, at the current dose studied, failed to produce a 30% progression free survival rate at 16 weeks considered to be a meaningful benefit for further development.

Purpose The objective of this study was to further investigate the efficacy and safety of low-dose outpatient chemobiotherapy in patients with unresectable metastatic melanoma. Patients and Methods Thirty-one patients with histologically confirmed unresectable measurable metastatic melanoma were enrolled onto an open-label, multicenter phase II study. The treatment regimen consisted of oral temozolomide followed by subcutaneous biotherapy with granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor, interferon-alfa, and recombinant interleukin-2 (rIL-2). Results Twenty-eight patients (90%) had M1c disease, and 58% had three or more sites of metastasis. Four patients (13%), all with M1c disease, had a complete response, and four patients had a partial response. The median progression-free survival was 4.9 months and the median overall survival was 13.1 months. Two patients (6%) developed CNS metastasis as the first site of disease progression, and 7 (23%) of 30 experienced CNS progression after receiving chemobiotherapy. A total of 112 cycles of therapy were administered. Toxicity occurred in 78% of the cycles and was grade 1 or 2 in the majority of cases and easily managed. Grade 4 toxicity occurred in 3% of the cycles. Conclusion This low-dose chemobiotherapy combination produces clinical responses in patients with metastatic melanoma, even in those with M1c disease, is well tolerated, and allows home dosing. It offers a reasonable alternative to high-dose regimens, such as high-dose biochemotherapy or rIL-2 requiring prolonged periods of hospitalization, or single agent outpatient regimens, such as dacarbazine, which is usually not effective in patients with M1c disease. Furthermore, it may protect against the development of brain metastases.

A variety of tumor-genetic alterations have been identified circulating free-form in the plasma and serum of cancer patients that may have diagnostic and prognostic implications. Currently, no consensus exists as to whether plasma or serum is preferable for circulating nucleic acid analysis, and the impact of collection and processing on yield is unknown. We prospectively assessed DNA content in paired plasma and serum obtained from 10 patients with AJCC stage IV advanced metastatic melanoma. Blood (30 mL) was collected from each patient as follows: 10 mL each was processed immediately for serum and plasma and an additional 10 mL was incubated overnight at 37 degrees C and processed for serum. In addition, blood was collected from 25 normal healthy donor volunteers to determine the concentration of free DNA circulating in paired plasma and serum. DNA was isolated from 800 microl of plasma or serum and quantified. Median-free DNA concentrations were fourfold greater in serum than in the corresponding plasma sample. Serum isolated from blood allowed to clot overnight yielded four times more DNA than serum processed immediately. Among normal healthy volunteers, only serum contained detectable free DNA. These findings provide conclusive evidence that elevated levels of circulating DNA could be identified consistently in patients with cancer than in normal healthy donors. Furthermore, the method of blood processing may significantly affect the levels of circulating nucleic acids and impact the investigator's results. Significant consideration must be given to the methods by which circulating nucleic acids are obtained for clinical analysis.

Allelic imbalance (AI) encompassing the apoptotic protease-activating factor 1 (APAF-1) locus (12q22-23) is found frequently in metastatic melanoma. Circulating DNA with AI on 12q22-23 in serum was evaluated as a surrogate marker to predict biochemotherapy (BC) treatment response in melanoma patients. Sera were collected from 49 American Joint Committee on Cancer stage IV melanoma patients treated with BC. Serum AI of the 12q22-23 region was demonstrated to be present before and/or after BC. BC responders showed a significantly lower frequency of AI (5 of 24, 21%) compared with nonresponders (11 of 20, 55%; Fisher’s exact test, P < 0.029). Serum AI on 12q22-23 was associated with worse prognosis (log-rank test, P < 0.046). These findings indicate that serial serum genetic analysis of tumor-related AI on 12q22-23 may have clinical use in predicting tumor response to therapy.

Purpose: A human monoclonal antibody (L612 HuMAb) that binds to ganglioside GM3 has been developed in our laboratory. L612 HuMAb is a 100% human IgM protein. L612 HuMAb binds to cell surface of melanoma and can kill the cells in the presence of complement. The primary objective of this study was to test the toxicity and pharmacokinetics associated with administration of L612 HuMAb to melanoma patients whose tumor cells expressed GM3. Experimental design: Nine patients with measurable metastatic melanoma (American Joint Committee on Cancer stage IV) were entered in the study. Eight had failed previous treatments that included chemotherapy, radiation therapy, melanoma cell vaccine, and/or biological therapy. All patients received a 48-h continuous infusion of L612 HuMAb at a dose of 960 mg, 1,440 mg, or 1,920 mg. Five of these patients received a second infusion and one patient received a third infusion, all with the previous dose. Results: Toxicity was limited to transient and mild pruritus and skin rash. One patient complained of pain at the site of subcutaneous metastases. Serum antibody levels peaked 24 to 48 h after starting the infusion. Two patients, one receiving a single course of 960 mg (612 mg/m2) and the second receiving two courses of 1,440 mg (911 mg/m2) followed by surgical therapy, are without evidence of disease >5 years after antibody infusion. Conclusions: The human IgM monoclonal antibody, L612 HuMAb, was well tolerated. Infusion of L612 HuMAb appears to produce significant antitumor activity in melanoma patients.

Objectives: Biochemotherapy outcomes were examined in stage IV melanoma patients with previously treated or active central nervous system (CNS) metastases prior to systemic therapy. Patients and Methods: Patients who received biochemotherapy for metastatic melanoma with active or pretreated CNS metastases were compared to patients without evidence of CNS metastases in terms of response, time to progression (TTP), overall survival (OS), and treatment toxicity. Results: Twenty-six (16%) of 159 total patients began biochemotherapy with previously treated or active CNS metastases (group I), compared to 133 (84%) who were radiographically free of CNS involvement (group II). A partial or complete response to biochemotherapy was seen in 13 (50%) group I patients, compared to 56 (42%) group II patients (p = 0.243). The median TTP and median survival were 5.5 and 7.0 months, respectively, for group I patients and 6.0 and 9.9 months, respectively, for group II patients (p = 0.222 and 0.434 for TTP and OS, respectively). Five (19%) group I patients survived longer than 24 months. Gamma Knife radiosurgery or surgical resection of CNS disease prior to biochemotherapy improved survival versus delayed treatment (p = 0.017 and 0.005, respectively). Conclusion: Patients with limited CNS metastases and widespread systemic disease can achieve prolonged survival with targeted treatment of CNS lesions and aggressive systemic therapy.

Objective To determine whether adjuvant postoperative active specific immunotherapy with a therapeutic polyvalent vaccine (PV) called Canvaxin can prolong survival following complete resection of melanoma metastatic to regional nodes (American Joint Committee on Cancer [AJCC] stage III melanoma). Background Data Despite complete lymphadenectomy, 5-year overall survival (OS) for patients with melanoma metastatic to regional lymph nodes is only 20% to 50%, depending on the number of tumor-involved nodes. In 1984, the authors began phase II trials of Canvaxin PV as postsurgical adjuvant therapy for AJCC stage III melanoma. Methods Patients who received PV between 1984 and 1998 were compared with patients who did not receive PV postsurgical therapy between 1971 and 1998. The seven covariates recently defined by the AJCC Melanoma Staging Committee (number of metastatic nodes, palpable status, ulceration, age, primary site, pT stage, and gender) were included by Cox regression in a multivariate model of OS. A computerized program matched PV and non-PV patients by these covariates. Results Of 2,602 patients who underwent complete lymphadenectomy for AJCC stage III melanoma with regional nodal metastases and were followed up by the same team of oncologists between 1971 and 1998, 935 received PV and 1,667 did not. Median OS and 5-year OS were significantly higher in PV than non-PV patients (56.4 vs. 31.9 months and 49% vs. 37%, respectively; P =.0001). When the non-PV patients were matched by the four most significant covariates, 447 matched pairs were formed between patients seen before or after January 1, 1985, and the OS was not different between the two time periods (P =.789). However, when the PV patients were matched with non-PV patients by six covariates forming 739 pairs, the PV patients survived longer (P =.0001). Detailed analysis of the 1,505 patients who were seen or who began vaccine therapy within 4 months after lymphadenectomy, and who had more complete data on the seven prognostic covariates showed that median OS and 5-year OS were higher in 445 PV patients than in 1,060 non-PV patients: 70.4 versus 31 months and 52% versus 37%, respectively (P =.0001). Multivariate Cox regression analysis identified six significant prognostic factors: number of metastatic nodes, size of metastatic nodes, pT stage, ulceration, age, and PV therapy. PV therapy reduced the relative risk of death to 0.64 (95% confidence interval, 0.55-0.76) (P =.0001); sex and site of primary were of borderline significance. Conclusions This large single-institution study independently confirmed the significance of prognostic covariates in the new AJCC staging system. By using modern statistical methods that controlled for all known prognostic factors, it also demonstrated PV's ability to significantly enhance OS. A multicenter phase III randomized trial is underway to validate the efficacy of PV as a postsurgical adjuvant.

Drugs currently available for intrathecal administration are cleared rapidly from the CSF. DepoCyt is a slow-release formulation of cytarabine that maintains cytotoxic concentrations of free cytarabine in the CSF for14 days following a single injection. DepoCyt was administered to 110 patients with a diagnosis of neoplastic meningitis based on either a positive CSF cytology (76) or neurologic and CT or MRI scan findings sufficient to document neoplastic meningitis (34). Patients were treated with DepoCyt 50mg every 2 weeks for 1 month of induction therapy by either lumbar puncture (LP) or intraventricular (IVT) injection. Patients without neurologic progression were candidates to receive an additional 3 months of consolidation therapy. All patients received dexamethasone 4 mg BID on days 1-5 of each cycle. Median time to neurologic progression was 55 days; median overall survival was 95 days. Among the 76 patients with a positive CSF cytology at baseline, 70 were evaluable for response, and of this group 19 (27%) attained the criteria for response (cytologic response in the absence of neurologic progression). The most important adverse events were headache and arachnoiditis. When drug-related, these were largely low grade, transient, and reversible. Drug-related grade 3 headache occurred on 4% of cycles; grade 3 or 4 arachnoiditis occurred on 6% of cycles. No cumulative toxicity was observed. DepoCyt injected once every 2 weeks produced a response-rate comparable to that previously reported for methotrexate given twice a week. The once in every 2-week-dosing interval offers an advantage over conventional schedules (2-3 doses/week) used for other agents available for intrathecal injection.

Purpose: To identify important prognostic factors predictive of survival and tumor control in patients with metastatic melanoma to the brain who underwent gamma knife radiosurgery. Methods and Materials: A total of 122 consecutive patients with 332 intracranial melanoma metastases underwent gamma knife radiosurgery over a 5-year period. Of these, 39 (32%) also received whole-brain irradiation (WBI). The median tumor volume was 0.8 cm 3 (range: 0.02–30.20 cm 3 ), and the median prescribed dose was 20 Gy (range: 14–24 Gy). Median follow-up was 6.8 months. Univariate and multivariate analyses of survival and freedom from progression were performed using the following parameters: status of systemic disease, intracranial tumor volume, number of lesions, tumor location, Karnofsky performance status, gender, age, and WBI. Results: Overall median survival was 7.0 months from time of radiosurgery and 9.1 months from the onset of brain metastasis. In multivariate analysis, improved survival was noted in patients with total intracranial tumor volume 3 ( p = 0.003) and inactive systemic disease ( p = 0.0065), whereas other parameters studied were of lesser importance (tumor location, p = 0.056, and Karnofsky performance status, p = 0.086), or of no significance (number of lesions, WBI, age, and gender). Freedom from subsequent brain metastasis depended on intracranial tumor volume ( p = 0.0018) and status of systemic disease ( p = 0.034). Conclusions: Stereotactic radiosurgery is an effective treatment modality for patients with intracranial metastatic melanoma. Tumor volume and status of systemic disease are good independent predictors of survival and freedom from tumor progression.

Background Single-agent or combination chemotherapy regimens have not impacted the short median survival of patients with metastatic melanoma, and complete or durable responses are rare. Biologic response modifiers (interferon and interleukin-2) have produced durable remissions in a small cohort of patients, and phase II trials of biochemotherapy suggest more benefit. Methods The authors retrospectively reviewed the status of the current treatments of metastatic melanoma focusing on biochemotherapy. Results Regimens include both sequential and concurrent approaches for inpatient and outpatient treatment settings. Overall response rates in phase II trials are 40% to 60% with complete responses of 10% to 20% and median survivals in the 11- to 12-month range. Modifications of concurrent biochemotherapy regimens have maintained efficacy and reduced toxicity. Small phase III trials suggest a survival advantage of biochemotherapy (P=.05). Conclusions Biochemotherapy remains a promising new treatment for metastatic melanoma. A large Intergroup trial E3695 comparing concurrent biochemotherapy to combination chemotherapy alone is powered to answer important survival questions.

We have developed a solid matrix immunoassay to determine the binding of interleukin-2 (IL-2) to specific gangliosides. The assay establishes that recombinant human IL-2 binds to ganglioside GD(1b) but not to any other gangliosides (GM(1), GM(2), GM(3), GD(1a), GD(2), GD(3), and GT(1b)). The binding varies with the ratio of GD1b and IL-2. This assay enables distinguishing the nature of the sugar moiety of the ganglioside recognized by IL-2 and establishes the dosimetry of the ganglioside-IL-2 interaction. Since rIL-2 is administered systematically into stage IV melanoma patients, we have examined 45 tumor biopsies for GD(1b) content. The incidence of GD(1b) in tumor biopsies is 51%. We postulate that GD(1b) associated on the tumor or in the circulation of cancer patients may bind to rIL-2 and prevent the availability of rIL-2 to augment antitumor-immune response.

Cutaneous melanoma is characterized by a high propensity for metastasis. Currently, surgical intervention remains the mainstay of therapy. This approach has proven most beneficial when the diagnosis is of early stage primary lesions. Likewise, patients undergoing resection for a solitary site of metastasis have shown a survival advantage. Identification of metastatic disease depends predominantly on radiographic techniques requiring the presence of significant tumor burdens for successful imaging. However, at that time, the role of surgery and/or biochemotherapy may be of limited value. Techniques to identify minimal disease states may permit more accurate assessment of prognosis. The detection of occult tumor cells by RT-PCR in the blood, lymph nodes, and bone marrow of melanoma patients provides one such approach to monitor tumor progression. Single-marker RT-PCR has been used as one such approach but is noted to have limitations in sensitivity and specificity based on the heterogeneity of tumor marker expression among tumors as well as within an individual tumor lesion or among multiple lesions in individual patients. We employed a multimarker reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction assay that demonstrates improved sensitivity over a single-marker approach. Currently, the consequences of detecting systemic subclinical metastasis remain unknown pending longer-term follow-up. The detection of occult melanoma cells using molecular techniques in conjunction with known clinicopathologic prognostic factors may provide a novel and efficient approach in monitoring tumor progression and further identify high-risk patients diagnosed early in the disease course.

Objective In recent years, stereotactic radiosurgery has been growing in popularity as a treatment modality for metastatic disease to the brain. The technique has advantages of reduced cost and low morbidity compared with open surgical treatment. Furthermore, it avoids the potential cognitive side effects of fractionated whole-brain radiotherapy. We undertook this study to determine the usefulness of adjuvant radiation therapy and to determine prognostic factors in patients treated with stereotactic radiosurgery. Methods We reviewed our series of patients with metastatic tumors treated using gamma knife stereotactic radiosurgery from August 1994 to February 1999. Nonparametric methods were used to compare treatment subgroups by demographic features including age, Karnofsky Performance Scale score, diagnosis, and systemic disease status. Univariate and multivariate analyses of survival and freedom from progression were performed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards regression techniques. Results This study included 190 patients harboring 431 lesions who were treated in 263 treatment sessions. The median follow-up after radiosurgery was 36 weeks for all patients. The median actuarial survival from the time of radiosurgery in all patients was 34 weeks. When patients were stratified according to tumor histology, those without melanoma had a median survival of 39 weeks, and those with melanoma had a median survival of 28 weeks. The cause of death could be determined in 122 (92%) of the patients known to have died during the data capture period. For patients harboring melanoma, death was attributable to systemic disease in 31 (47%), to central nervous system-related processes in 29 (44%), and to unknown causes in 6 (9%). For non-melanoma patients, death was attributable to systemic disease in 45 (68%), to central nervous system-related processes in 17 (26%), and to unknown causes in 4 (6%). Significantly improved survival (P = 0.002) was observed in patients with controlled systemic disease. No significant difference in survival could be ascertained for patients presenting with up to four lesions, although patients with a total tumor volume greater than 9 cc had shortened survival. No survival benefit could be demonstrated for whole-brain radiotherapy administered either concomitantly or after radiosurgery. Conclusion Factors correlated with significantly improved survival included controlled systemic disease and non-melanoma histology. We found no significant survival benefit that could be discerned from adjuvant whole-brain radiotherapy in this patient group.

PURPOSE: Concurrent biochemotherapy results in high response rates but also significant toxicity in patients with metastatic melanoma. We attempted to improve its efficacy and decrease its toxicity by using decrescendo dosing of interleukin-2 (IL-2), posttreatment granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), and low-dose tamoxifen. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-five patients with poor prognosis metastatic melanoma were treated at a community hospital inpatient oncology unit affiliated with the John Wayne Cancer Institute (Santa Monica, CA) between July 1995 and September 1997. A 5-day modified concurrent biochemotherapy regimen of dacarbazine, vinblastine, cisplatin, decrescendo IL-2, interferon alfa-2b, and tamoxifen was repeated at 21-day intervals. G-CSF was administered beginning on day 6 for 7 to 10 days. RESULTS: The overall response rate was 57% (95% confidence interval, 42% to 72%), the complete response rate was 23%, and the partial response rate was 34%. Complete remissions were achieved in an additional 11% of patients by surgical resection of residual disease after biochemotherapy. The median time to progression was 6.3 months and the median duration of survival was 11.4 months. At a maximum follow-up of 36 months (range, 10 to 36 months), 32% of patients are alive and 14% remain free of disease. Decrescendo IL-2 dosing and administration of G-CSF seemed to reduce toxicity, length of hospital stay, and readmission rates. No patient required intensive care unit monitoring, and there were no treatment-related deaths. CONCLUSION: The data from this study indicate that the modified concurrent biochemotherapy regimen reduces the toxicity of concurrent biochemotherapy with no apparent decrease in response rate in patients with poor prognosis metastatic melanoma.

Context.— Previous studies have documented that cancer patients tend to overestimate the probability of long-term survival. If patient preferences about the trade-offs between the risks and benefits associated with alternative treatment strategies are based on inaccurate perceptions of prognosis, then treatment choices may not reflect each patient’s true values. Objective.— To test the hypothesis that among terminally ill cancer patients an accurate understanding of prognosis is associated with a preference for therapy that focuses on comfort over attempts at life extension. Design.— Prospective cohort study. Setting.—Five teaching hospitals in the United States. Patients.—A total of 917 adults hospitalized with stage III or IV non‐small cell lung cancer or colon cancer metastatic to liver in phases 1 and 2 of the Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatments (SUPPORT). Main Outcome Measures.— Proportion of patients favoring life-extending therapy over therapy focusing on relief of pain and discomfort, patient and physician estimates of the probability of 6-month survival, and actual 6-month survival. Results.— Patients who thought they were going to live for at least 6 months were more likely (odds ratio [OR], 2.6; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.8-3.7) to favor lifeextending therapy over comfort care compared with patients who thought there was at least a 10% chance that they would not live 6 months. This OR was highest (8.5; 95% CI, 3.0-24.0) among patients who estimated their 6-month survival probability at greater than 90% but whose physicians estimated it at 10% or less. Patients overestimated their chances of surviving 6 months, while physicians estimated prognosis quite accurately. Patients who preferred life-extending therapy were more likely to undergo aggressive treatment, but controlling for known prognostic factors, their 6-month survival was no better. Conclusions.— Patients with metastatic colon and lung cancer overestimate their survival probabilities and these estimates may influence their preferences about medical therapies.

9058 Background: Lenvatinib is an oral receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor targeting VEGFR1-3, FGFR1-4, RET, KIT, and PDGFRβ. Phase I and II studies of lenvatinib demonstrate that a subset of advanced melanoma patients (pts) appears to derive benefit from lenvatinib treatment (tx), prompting a need to identify predictive biomarkers for response to lenvatinib. Methods: Serum and archival tumor samples were collected from 93 enrolled pts in the BRAF wild-type (wt) cohort of the lenvatinib phase II study of advanced melanoma. Concentrations of 50 factors were measured in pre- and post-tx serum samples; 58 archival tumor tissues were obtained and gene mutation (mut) (n=53) and gene expression profiling (GEP) (n=39) analyses were performed. For mut analysis, targeted resequencing was performed on a select panel of genes using the Ion PGM Sequencer and mut validation studies were performed. For GEP analysis, the nCounterAnalysis System was used to measure the expression level of 330 genes. Results: Clinical benefit rate (32%) and objective response rate (9%) by independent radiologic review were observed in the BRAF wt cohort. In serum biomarker analysis, lenvatinib tx resulted in a decrease in soluble VEGFR2 and increase in VEGF and PlGF levels consistent with target engagement. Correlation with clinical outcome demonstrated that baseline (BL) levels of Ang-2, IL8, PlGF, and PDGFBB associated with OS, but only pts with low BL Ang-2 levels also demonstrated improved response. High BL levels of FLT3LG and eotaxin associated with longer OS and improved response. In GEP analysis, expression levels of a set of genes including TARBP2, ZNF544, and NF1 (targets identified in phase I and preclinical studies) associated with OS. In gene mut analysis, NRAS mut showed a trend towards longer OS. Pts with NRAS mut along with wt PIK3CA status demonstrated longer OS. Conclusions: Lenvatinib demonstrated limited response in BRAF wt advanced melanoma pts. A subset of pts may derive extended clinical benefit. NRAS mut/PIK3CA wt status and low BL Ang-2 levels appear to associate with improved clinical outcome in this pt population and require further study to assess their predictive value. Clinical trial information: NCT01136967.

9026 Background: Lenvatinib is an oral receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor targeting VEGFR1-3, FGFR1-4, RET, KIT, and PDGFRβ. Melanoma responses in the phase I study led to this multicenter phase II trial of lenvatinib in separate cohorts of BRAF mutant and BRAF wild-type (wt) melanoma to provide an estimate of efficacy and to identify molecular correlates of clinical benefit. Primary analyses of clinical outcomes for the BRAF wt cohort are reported here; the BRAF mutant cohort will be presented at a later date. Methods: Eligible patients (pts) had stage IV or unresectable stage III BRAF wt melanoma with ≥1 prior treatment (26/96 [27%] pts received ≥3 treatments) and no prior VEGF-targeted therapy. Lenvatinib 24 mg once daily with dose reduction for toxicity was administered until disease progression or unmanageable toxicities. Primary endpoint was response rate by independent review (IRR) using RECIST 1.1. Archival tumor tissue and baseline and posttreatment serum samples were collected for molecular analysis. Results: 93 pts were treated (median [m] age: 64 y; male: 69%; 95% AJCC stage IV). Confirmed partial responses (PRs) were observed in 8 pts (9%) with a clinical benefit rate (CR+PR+durable SD ≥23 wks) of 32% by IRR. mPFS was 3.7 mos (95% CI, 2.5-4.0) by IRR and mOS was 9.5 mos (95% CI, 8.3-12.9); 46% pts required dose reduction for management of toxicity; 12% were withdrawn from therapy due to toxicity. Treatment-related adverse events reported in ≥20% pts included hypertension 59% (34% Gr 3/4), fatigue 58% (16% Gr 3/4), nausea 44% (3% Gr 3/4), diarrhea 43% (2% Gr 3/4), decreased appetite 38%, vomiting 29% (2% Gr 3), dysphonia 27%, and proteinuria and headache 26% each (4% and 1% Gr 3/4). Serum biomarker analysis showed baseline levels of serum angiogenic factors, such as angiopoietin-2, correlated with OS. More extensive biomarker analyses are reported in an accompanying abstract. Conclusions: Lenvatinib administered to pts with advanced BRAF wt melanoma was associated with frequent but manageable toxicity. Clinical benefit was seen in some pts. Predictive biomarkers for response to lenvatinib, such as the serum level of angiogenic factors, may be useful for future clinical trials. Clinical trial information: NCT01136967.

TPS9103 Background: Ipilimumab (Ipi), a fully human monoclonal antibody that binds to cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4 expressed on T cells, and vemurafenib (Vem), a small molecule inhibitor of BRAF V600-mutated kinase, are both approved treatments for AM. Ipi has shown improved overall survival (OS) in two randomized phase III trials of patients with previously treated (3 mg/kg monotherapy) and previously untreated (10 mg/kg plus dacarbazine) AM. Vem has shown improved OS in a randomized phase III trial of patients that harbor the BRAF V600E mutation. The most common drug-related adverse events (AEs) with Ipi monotherapy were immune-related GI tract and skin toxicities, which were generally manageable using treatment guidelines. The most common AEs with Vem were arthralgia, rash, and fatigue. Vem can induce rapid and substantial responses, and resistance mechanisms are a focus of current investigation. This study will evaluate the safety of Vem lead-in followed by Ipi (prior to resistance) in patients with BRAF V600-mutated AM. Methods: An estimated 45 patients will be enrolled. Eligible patients include those ≥18 years old with previously untreated AM, a BRAF V600 mutation, and an ECOG PS of 0 or 1. Major exclusion criteria are primary ocular melanoma, active brain metastases, and autoimmune disease. Patients will initially receive Vem for 6 weeks (960 mg twice daily). After a washout period of 3-10 days (per protocol), patients will be initiated on Ipi at 10 mg/kg (every 3 wk for 4 doses, then once every 12 wk beginning at week 24, until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity). Vem will be restarted at the time of disease progression on Ipi (no minimum time to restart) or unacceptable toxicity on Ipi (restart minimum of 1 mo after the last dose of Ipi). Vem will be restarted at the last dose level tolerated at the end of the lead-in phase. Patients will be followed every 12 weeks for toxicity and/or disease progression, and subsequently will be followed every 12 weeks for survival. The objectives of this study are to estimate the incidence of grade 3-4 drug-related AEs. Exploratory objectives include the evaluation of efficacy (OS). Clinical trial information: NCT01673854.

9059 Background: Ipi is a fully human monoclonal antibody that binds to cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4 to augment antitumor immune responses. In phase III study MDX010-20, where patients (pts) could be retreated if they met safety criteria and achieved an objective response or stable disease ≥3 months from the end of the induction period (q3 weeks for 4 doses), 21 of 31 pts (68%) retreated with Ipi reestablished disease control. CA184-025 is a roll-over study of extended Ipi treatment or survival follow-up in pts who received Ipi in phase II trials, with the primary objective of evaluating safety during extended treatment. We report the safety profile in pts retreated with Ipi in study 025. Methods: Eligible pts in phase II trials CA184-004, -007, -008, -022, MDX010-08, or -015 were enrolled in study 025 (N=248) to receive retreatment (at the time of progression), extended maintenance (if no prior progression), or survival follow-up only. Pts were ineligible for retreatment if they had experienced a grade 3-4 non-skin toxicity during prior Ipi therapy. Ipi was administered at 10 mg/kg, q3 weeks for 4 doses, to 111 pts who initially received Ipi induction at 0.3, 3, or 10 mg/kg in a parent study. Results: In this selected population of eligible pts, the nature and frequency of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) during retreatment were similar to those reported in previous studies, which most commonly affected the GI tract and skin (Table). There were no new types of drug-related irAEs and no grade 5 irAEs upon retreatment. Conclusions: Retreatment with Ipi at 10 mg/kg in these pts was generally well tolerated and the safety profile was similar to that during induction dosing in the parent studies. The higher frequencies of irAEs at lower doses should be interpreted with caution given the small sample sizes. An ongoing, randomized phase II trial will evaluate the clinical benefit of Ipi retreatment. Clinical trial information: NCT00162123. [Table: see text]

e13088 Background: ALT-801 is recombinant human interleukin-2 (IL-2) genetically fused to a single-chain T-cell receptor specific to a peptide antigen of human p53 presented in the context of HLA-A2 positivity. In melanoma xenograft mouse models, this fusion protein alone demonstrated potent, targeted antitumor activity and synergistic efficacy was observed in combination with CDDP. A prior phase I study in pts with metastatic malignancies, including metastatic melanoma, showed that ALT-801 monotherapy could be safely administered and was associated with immunologic changes of potential antitumor relevance (Fishman 2011 CCR 17:7765). Here we report the results of a phase Ib study of ALT-801+ CDDP in pts with metastatic melanoma. Methods: The primary objectives of this multicenter study are to: 1) define an MTD and evaluate the safety of ALT-801+CDDP and 2) assess the objective response rate according to RECIST criteria in treated patients. Eligible pts (histologically confirmed advanced/metastatic melanoma, p53 peptide/HLA-A2+ tumor, chemotherapy naive, PS (ECOG) 0-1, adequate renal and cardiac functions) received 2 consecutive 4-wk courses of CDDP (70 mg/m2 iv, Day 1) and ALT-801 (iv, Days 3, 5, 15, 17 & 19). Pts with SD or better after 2 courses received 2 additional courses of treatment. Up to 5 cohorts (3+3 dose escalation) of ALT-801 (0.04 - 0.12 mg/kg) were planned with a 2-stage design of expanded pt enrollment at the MTD. Results: 22 patients (11M, 11F, 30-74 yrs) were evaluable at ALT-801 dose levels from 0.04 to 0.10 mg/kg. The MTD has not been reached at 0.10 mg/kg ALT-801. Toxicity was manageable and transient. RECIST-confirmed tumor response and disease stabilization was reported for some patients. Overall survival rates (6 mon, 87%; 12 mon, 58%) observed to date suggest durable clinical benefit. Conclusions: ALT-801+CDDP can be safely administered in an out-patient setting to pts with metastatic melanoma. Preliminary evaluation suggests durable clinical activity of the ALT-801+CDDP regimen in melanoma patients. A trial using ALT-801 at the 0.1 mg/kg dose level in combination with a BRAF kinase inhibitor is being planned for patients with metastatic melanoma (CA097550).

LBA4 Background: About 50% of melanomas have an activating V600EBRAF mutation which led to the hypothesis that inhibition of the mutated BRAF kinase may be of clinical benefit. Phase I and II trials with vemurafenib (previously PLX4032/RO5185426), an orally available inhibitor of oncogenic BRAF kinase, showed response rates (RR; CR+PR) >50% in V600EBRAF- mutated melanoma patients (pts). We conducted a phase III trial to determine if vemurafenib improved overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in melanoma pts with V600EBRAF mutation. Methods: Pts with previously untreated, unresectable stage IIIC or stage IV melanoma that tested positive for V600EBRAF mutation by the cobas 4800 BRAF V600 Mutation Test were randomized (1:1) to vemurafenib (960 mg po bid) or DTIC (1,000 mg/m2, IV, q3w). Randomization was stratified by PS, stage, LDH, and geographic region. Pts were assessed for tumor responses after weeks 6, 12, and then q9 weeks. Co-primary endpoints were OS and PFS on the intent-to-treat population; secondary endpoints included RR, response duration, and safety. Final analysis was planned at 196 deaths. Results: 675 pts were enrolled at 103 centers worldwide between Jan and Dec 2010. Treatment cohorts were well-balanced. At the pre-planned interim analysis (50% of deaths needed for final analysis), the hazard ratios for OS and PFS were 0.37 (95% CI 0.26 to 0.55; pV600EBRAF-mutated metastatic melanoma.

LBA5 Background: IPI monotherapy (3mg/kg) improved overall survival (OS) in a phase III study of previously treated, unresectable or metastatic melanoma. Current study in 1st line metastatic melanoma evaluates combination of DTIC (a global standard of care) plus IPI. Methods: In this double-blind phase 3 study, patients (pts) with metastatic melanoma, ECOG PS 0/1, and no prior therapy for advanced disease, were randomized 1:1 to IPI (10 mg/kg) + DTIC (850 mg/m2) or placebo + DTIC (850 mg/m2) at Wks 1, 4, 7, 10 followed by DTIC q3 wks through Wk 22 (induction). Eligible pts received IPI or placebo q12 wks as maintenance. Primary endpoint was OS; 2-sided log-rank test was performed, stratified by baseline M stage and ECOG PS. Results: Of 502 pts, 56% had M1c disease, 40% elevated LDH, and 26% adjuvant therapy. 37% in IPI + DTIC and 65% in DTIC alone arms received 4 induction doses. A significant improvement in OS (HR=0.72; P=0.0009) and higher estimated 1, 2 and 3 yr survival rates were seen with IPI + DTIC...

8543 Background: We reported preliminary results of a trial investigating the safety and efficacy of nab-paclitaxel and bevacizumab as first line therapy in patients with unresectable melanoma at A...