101. Re (Cell) LCD: A Feasibility Study On Recycling Cell Phone LCDS
- Author
-
Christopher C. Beaschler, Matt S. Shea, Abdulaziz Alotaibi, and Siddharth N. Rathod
- Subjects
0209 industrial biotechnology ,Multimedia ,business.industry ,02 engineering and technology ,010501 environmental sciences ,Environmental economics ,Backlight ,Reuse ,computer.software_genre ,01 natural sciences ,Product (business) ,020901 industrial engineering & automation ,Work (electrical) ,Phone ,Hydroelectricity ,Electricity ,business ,Energy source ,computer ,0105 earth and related environmental sciences - Abstract
More than 3 million tons of e-waste were generated in 2007 in the United States, with 13.6 percent collected for recycling and 86.4 percent going to landfills and incinerators. The environmental impacts of LCDs disposal are significant and increasing Millions of tonnes of e- waste in the United States are being discarded into landfills, about 1.36 – 1.72 million metric tonnes, of which 0.34 million went to recycling . Few studies on recycling of cell phone LCD have been accomplished. Since everyday around 300,000 mobile phones are sent to trash in United States alone, the recycling of LCD of cell phones is still a challenge for recyclers. Introduction Environmental Impact Assessment Methodology Need of Recycling of LCD of Cell Phone Sensitivity Analysis By using the sustainable minds software, we ran tests that involved changing the steel in the phone which was the highest used material in phones at 33.5%. In the Environmental Feasibility section of the results it was found that manufacturing, not the End-Of-Life of the product was the largest contributor of toxins, when preforming an entire life cycle analysis. In the Environmental Feasibility section of the results it was found that manufacturing, not the End-Of-Life of the product was the largest contributor of toxins, when preforming an entire life cycle analysis. The manufacturing side represented no less than 40% of the pollution in each category. When focusing on LCD’s in cellphones it was found that the recovery value of the phones at $74 is drastically outweighed by the dismantling costs of around $128/hour. Conclusion Future researchers and companies can make tremendous improvements to improve this area through implementation of a more sustainable systems and more efficient products. In doing so, we hope to create more sustainable LCD products and reduce the impact it has on the environment. Future Work Economic Feasibility The LCD screens were composed of different materials, including connectors, adhesives, diffusive sheets, reflective sheets, polarizing film, plastic frame, and LCD panel. For the impact assessment, sustainable mind software was used. The categories are climate change, ecosystem quality, human health and resources. The manufacturing phase dominates in all the categories for all LCD cellphones. The LCD of cellphones consume less power, so the effect of use phase is very low in most of the categories except acidification potential, climate change and abiotic depletion categories. It contributes negligibly to all eco-toxicity categories. Environmental Feasibility The cell phone market is increasing in the past 15 years, as figure shows. Worldwide, cell phone subscribers are growth at average 13.5% per year from 2,205 million to 7,085 million in 2005 to 2015. The statistic in figure shows a forecast of number of mobile users worldwide from 2015 to 2020. Of the collected phones, 65% can be reuse with only minor refurbishment, while 35% are damaged beyond repair and are thus recycled for raw materials. There are many health concerns that come from not properly disposing of LCD’s rather than looking to recycle. These toxins have posed a potential problem for implementing a fully sustainable process. There is not much data about the average compositions of cell phone LCD screens, it is assumed that technology and material composition is in similar ratio to those of larger screens. We will match with average material content in LCD and find the approximate values of all compounds in LCD of cellphone. The average composition of the most important parts of LCD screens by weight will be used to model cell phone LCD screens in LCA software sustainable minds. The two main processes for LCD recycling: 1. The removal of the liquid crystals 2. Recovery of glass and polarizer Global cell phone subscriptions per 100 inhabitants went from 33.9 in 2005 to 96.8 in 2015. Monitor TV Cell Phones Material Revenues ($/t) 194 117 74 Dismantling Cost ($/t) -948 -477 -128 Total ($/t) -755 -359 -54 Total ($/unit) -4.30 -5.43 -1.92 For monitors, TV-sets and cellphones, costs of dismantling were considerably higher than material revenues. Labor costs were a main cost factor in the dismantling process. Average Weight (lb) Market Value ($/lb) Recovery Value ($) Steel 1.15 0.79 0.91 Mixed Plastics 1.48 0.19 0.28 Wire and Cable 0.02 0.93 0.02 Screen Driver Circuit 0.08 6.56 0.53 Other Circuit Boards 0.3 4.28 1.28 Backlight Lamps 2-4 pieces -$0.40/piece -1.20 Recovery Value Total $1.82 For precise yields, a market research was assumed and costs and revenues of dismantling and recycling were calculated. Data of cellphone LCD is extracted from the data of LCD of Monitor. Energy Source Europe Electricity Mix US Electricity Mix Coal + Ignite 43.24 % 67.9 % Oil 1.42 % 1.0 % Natural Gas 14.94 % 11.6 % Nuclear Power 23.76 % 2.3 % Wind Power 10.37 % 2.3 % Biomass Power 1.74 % 0.9 % Hydroelectricity 1.57 % 1.0 % In this case, US electricity mix was replaced with the Europe electricity mix to measure robustness of model. The Europe and US electricity mixes are giving similar values for manufacturing and EoL phases where the electricity consumption is low.
- Published
- 2017