101. Bevacizumab and atezolizumab as first-line therapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: A Taiwanese subgroup analysis on efficacy and safety.
- Author
-
Shao YY, Feng YH, Yen CJ, Yang TS, Shen YC, Chao Y, Chen JS, Su CY, Chen WJ, Hsiang HL, and Hsu CH
- Subjects
- Humans, Middle Aged, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized, Bevacizumab, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols adverse effects, Carcinoma, Hepatocellular drug therapy, Liver Neoplasms drug therapy
- Abstract
Background: The combination of bevacizumab and atezolizumab has been established as a standard first-line systemic treatment for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We examined the treatment outcomes of patients in Taiwan who received the combination in 2 pivotal clinical trials., Methods: All patients who resided in Taiwan, were enrolled in the IMbrave150 and GO30140 studies, and received bevacizumab and atezolizumab as the first-line systemic therapy for unresectable HCC were included. We extracted and pooled anonymous raw data from the study records., Results: We enrolled 40 patients, with the median age of 62.5 years; 36 (90%) had Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage C disease. The response rate was 37.5%, including 3 (7.5%) complete responses. The disease control rate was 85%. The median duration of response was 21.4 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 16.6-not estimable). The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 8.6 (95% CI, 5.6-18.6) and 24.9 months (95% CI, 14.2-not estimable), respectively. The most common adverse events of all grades were proteinuria (50%) and hypertension (37.5%), the median onset of which were 157 and 127 days, respectively. Bevacizumab and atezolizumab treatment had to be interrupted in 20 (50%) and 13 (32.5%) patients, respectively. Among patients whose treatment duration was ≥6 months, 50% of them had to skip bevacizumab, but no signal of poorer PFS or OS was observed., Conclusion: In Taiwanese patients with advanced HCC, the efficacy and safety outcomes of bevacizumab and atezolizumab treatment were generally consistent with the global intent-to-treat populations., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest YYS had received honoraria from AstraZeneca, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eisai, Eli Lilly, Ipsen, Merck, Ono, and Roche. YHF had received honoraria from Roche, AbbVie, and Novartis. CJY declared no conflict of interest to disclose. TSY declared no conflict of interest to disclose. YCS had received honoraria from AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb/Ono, Roche and Eisai. YC declared no conflict of interest to disclose. JSC had received research founding from Ono Pharmaceutical, MSD Oncology, Lilly, TTY Biopharm, Merck KGaA, Roche, AstraZeneca, Janssen, Syncore, Astellas Pharma and Senhwa Biosciences. CYS, WJC, and HLH are employed by Roche. CHH has served as a consultant in advisory boards of Roche and AstraZeneca, has received honoraria from Bristol Myers Squibb, Ono Pharmaceutical, Merck Sharp & Dohme, and Roche, and has received research grant from AstraZeneca, Bayer, Eli Lilly, Genentech, and Roche., (Copyright © 2022 Formosan Medical Association. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF