Search

Introduction: Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (allo-HCT) is a potential curative therapy for a variety of both malignant and nonmalignant hematologic disorders. However, allo-HCT is costly and requires highly specialized, technologically advanced care that is only available in select healthcare centers across the country. Due to its cost and limited availability, minority populations are at risk for healthcare disparities in access to and outcomes of allo-HCT. Prior studies have focused on the impact of health disparities, including race, and geographic residence at time of transplant, on allo-HCT outcomes with variable results. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of race and location of residence on outcomes of allo-HCT at one major referral institution. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients that underwent allo-HCT at the Ohio State University from 1984 to 2018. The impact of demographic factors including race and place of primary residence were assessed. Patients were divided into race defined as Caucasian, African American (AA), and other. They were also grouped by zip code into rural, suburban, and urban groups. Rural was defined as less than 1000 people per square mile, suburban between 1000-3000 people per square mile, and urban greater than 3000 people per square mile. 2018 population estimates were used. Patients were then stratified into 7 groups based on year (yr) of transplant for analysis. Group (gp) 1 included 1984-1988, gp 2 1989-1993, gp 3 1994-1998, gp 4 1999-2003, gp 5 2004-2008, gp 6 2009-2013, and gp 7 2014-2018. Primary endpoints were progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). PFS and OS were calculated using Kaplan Meier Curves and compared using log-rank test between race and residence groups. Results: A total of 1,943 patients were included in the study. Of these patients, median age at time of transplant was 50 years old (range 18-76), and 59.6% were male. AML/MDS patients made up the majority of the cohort at 46.3%, with the other most common diagnoses being non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (14.2%), acute lymphocytic leukemia (11.8%), and chronic myeloid leukemia (10.1%). Most patients (94.3%) identified as Caucasian, while 4.6% identified as AA, and 1.1% other. The majority of patients lived in a rural area at the time of transplant with 63.4% rural, 22.9% suburban, and 13.8% urban. There was no significant difference in OS or PFS between Caucasian and AA patients (Figure 1A and B; p=0.15, 0.21). Median OS for AA was 1.9 yrs [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.8-3.6] as compared to 2.3 yrs (95% CI: 1.9-2.9) for Caucasians, with 5 -yr OS of 33 vs. 42% and 10-yr OS of 21 vs. 36% for AA and Caucasian, respectively. Median PFS was 0.9 (95% CI: 0.5-2.7) and 1.3 yrs (95% CI 1.1-1.6), with 5 -yr PFS of 30 vs. 37% and 10-yr PFS of 21 vs. 32% for AA and Caucasian, respectively. There also was no significant difference in OS or PFS between rural, urban, and suburban patients (Figure 2A and 2B; p=0.39, 0.17), with median OS in the three groups 2.2 (95%CI: 1.7-2.9), 2.9 (95%CI: 1.6-4.5), and 2.2 (95% CI: 1.6-3.6) yrs, and 5-yr OS of 40 vs. 43 vs. 43% and 10-yr OS of 33 vs. 39 vs. 39%, respectively. Median PFS were 2.2 (95%CI: 1.7-2.9), 2.9 (95%CI: 1.6-4.5), and 2.2 yrs [95% CI: 1.6-3.6], with 5-yr PFS of 36 vs. 40 vs. 38% and 10-yr PFS of 30 vs. 37 vs. 35%, respectively. Conclusion: Our study suggests that once patients undergo allo-HCT, there is no significant difference in outcomes between patients based on race or residence. This finding suggests that while these underserved populations may initially have less access to specialized care for HCT, if they ultimately undergo allo-HCT, outcomes are similar to their counterparts. Our study did show a significantly lower rates of allo-HCT performed in non-Caucasian races (94% Caucasians vs 4.6% AA and 1% other), which may reflect disparities in access to care in these groups as well as a lack of donors. Further research is needed to assess the barriers for these underserved patients to undergo transplant and to help ameliorate these barriers. Disclosures Chaudhry: Sanofi: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Bumma:Amgen: Speakers Bureau; Sanofi: Speakers Bureau. Khan:Amgen: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy. Devarakonda:Janssen: Consultancy. Vasu:Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Omeros: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kiadis Inc: Other: Kiadis has obtained exclusive licensing requirements from The OHio State University. Jaglowski:Kite, a Gilead Company: Consultancy, Research Funding; Juno: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; CRISPR: Consultancy. William:Merck: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Dova: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Guidepoint Global: Consultancy; Kyowa Kirin: Consultancy, Honoraria. Mims:Syndax Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kura Oncology: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Leukemia and Lymphoma Society: Other: Senior Medical Director for Beat AML Study; Agios: Consultancy; Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Other: Data Safety Monitoring Board. Brammer:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Speakers Bureau; Celgene Corporation: Research Funding. Efebera:Celgene: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Ohio State University: Current Employment.

Introduction Socioeconomic status has been demonstrated to impact not only medical treatment patients receive, but also outcomes after treatment (Hastert, 2015; Hines, 2014; Kim, 2011; Hackley 2005). Prior studies assert that low income areas include patients with a later cancer stage at diagnosis, an older population, lower income households, a higher percentage of Medicaid population, and lower percentage of residents with a higher education (Hastert, 2015; Bradley, 2002; Lin, 2014). Patients from low income areas may have decreased access to healthcare and limited understanding of cancer treatment options. As a result, there may be differences in their medical treatment (Hines, 2014). The Appalachian Regional Commission (ARC) demonstrated that the Appalachian population in Ohio, Kentucky and Pennsylvania has a high percentage of poverty and lower education status (Vanderpool, 2019). The Appalachian population has more people living in rural environments, higher levels of obesity, and negative cancer beliefs (Vanderpool, 2019). SEER data combined with CIBMTR data demonstrated that patients from socially disadvantaged areas are referred for transplant less often, and data from Virginia shows a regional variation in referral for SCT for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) (Paulson, 2019; Arora, 2018). Our aim in this study was to determine if allogeneic stem cell transplant (ASCT) outcomes differ between Appalachian (AR) and non-Appalachian residents (non-AR). Methods A retrospective review of patient records was conducted for 1168 patients who underwent ASCT from 2008-2018 at The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center. Patients were classified as either AR or non-AR based on zip code according to ARC designation. We compared the clinical and demographic variables between the patients from Appalachian area versus not, using Fisher exact test or chi-square test for categorical variables and the Wilcoxon rank sum test for the continuous variables. Overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS) estimates were calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. Cumulative incidence of acute GVHD, chronic GVHD, relapse and non-relapse mortality (NRM) were analyzed using Gray's test and accounting for competing risks, where the competing risks for aGVHD and cGVHD were relapse or death, the competing risk for relapse was death from any cause and the competing risk for NRM was death due to disease. Results Out of the 1168 patients included in our study, 887 (75.94%) were non-Appalachian and 291 (24.91%) were Appalachian residents. There was no significant difference in age (p 0.14) or gender (p 0.54) between the two groups. The non-AR group and AR group did have a statically significant difference (p In both groups, the majority of patients were diagnosed with AML/CMML (42.19% non-AR, 40.55% AR). Other diseases represented included MDS/AA, ALL/PLL, CLL, NHL, CML, HD/HOD, MF, MM; there was no statistical significance with regard to disease distribution between the two populations (p 0.68). Disease related factors including performance status (graded by Karnofsky Score), remission status, comorbidity index, were similar between both groups-as were transplant related factors such as conditioning regimen, donor type, tissue type, CD 34 and CD 3 count (Table 2). BMT related milestones and complications such as days to engraftment, bacteremia, viremia, fungemia, hemorrhagic cystitis, VOD and pulmonary complications were not statistically significant between the two groups (Table 3). Cumulative incidence of those diagnosed with acute and chronic GVHD were not statistically significant between the groups (Graphs 1-2). Outcomes of non-AR and AR groups were compared; results demonstrated that relapse, relapse free survival, overall survival and non-relapse mortality were not statistically significant (Graphs 3-6). Conclusion Our analysis demonstrates that despite several barriers to medical care, AR patients have similar outcomes to non-AR patients after ASCT. As a result, we encourage providers not to view Appalachian residence as an indicator of poorer outcomes. Instead, we recommend supporting and referring Appalachian patients for transplant as aggressively as non-Appalachian patients. This single-institution study should be evaluated with a larger multi-center cohort. Disclosures Brammer: Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Speakers Bureau; Celgene Corporation: Research Funding. Efebera:Celgene: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Ohio State University: Current Employment. Mims:Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Agios: Consultancy; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Leukemia and Lymphoma Society: Other: Senior Medical Director for Beat AML Study; Kura Oncology: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Syndax Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Other: Data Safety Monitoring Board. Vasu:Kiadis Inc: Other: Kiadis has obtained exclusive licensing requirements from The OHio State University; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Omeros: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Jaglowski:Kite, a Gilead Company: Consultancy, Research Funding; Juno: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; CRISPR: Consultancy.

Background: Axi-cel, an autologous anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy, is approved for treatment of adult pts with R/R LBCL after ≥ 2 lines of systemic therapy. In the pivotal ZUMA-1 study, axi-cel demonstrated durable responses and a largely manageable safety profile (Locke FL, et al. Lancet Oncol. 2019). ZUMA-9 (NCT03153462), a multicenter, open-label study, provided pts with R/R LBCL with expanded access to axi-cel until commercial availability (Cohort 1 [C1]) and later, if commercially manufactured product did not meet commercial release specification(s) (Cohort 2 [C2]). Safety and efficacy of axi-cel (C1 and C2) and translational analyses (C2) are presented. Methods: Eligible adults had histologically confirmed R/R LBCL, ECOG ≤ 1, and received prior CD20-targeting and an anthracycline-containing regimen. C2 pts must have had commercial OOS product. Pts underwent leukaphersis and conditioning chemotherapy (cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m2/day and fludarabine 30 mg/m2/day) for 3 days followed by a single axi-cel infusion (target dose, 2 × 106 CAR T cells/kg). C1 and C2 pts with high disease burden could receive bridging therapy before conditioning at investigator's discretion. Endpoints included frequency of adverse events (AEs), objective response rate (ORR) per standard-of-care imaging assessment, overall survival (OS) for C1 and C2, and blood CAR T cells levels and serum cytokines for C2 only. Outcomes were contextualized with the primary analysis of ZUMA-1 C1+2 (n = 101; ≥ 6 mo of follow-up; Neelapu SS, et al. NEJM. 2017). Results: As of 11/29/2019 (C1) and 3/15/2020 (C2), 25 C1 pts and 36 C2 pts received axi-cel with a median follow-up of 27.1 mo (range, 23.6 - 29.6) and 13.2 mo (range, 0.4 - 25.7), respectively. In C1, median age was 56 y (range, 28 - 76), 60% were male, 80% had DLBCL, 48%/0% had ECOG1/≥2, 44% had IPI ≥3, and 64% had ≥ 3 prior lines of therapy. In C2, median age was 61 y (range, 24 - 81), 75% were male, 78% had DLBCL, 58%/17% had ECOG 1/≥2, 56% had IPI ≥3, and 69% had ≥ 3 prior lines of therapy. In C2, 50% of pts had OOS product with low viability, 28% had high IFN-γ, 14% had low IFN-γ, 14% received a low dose, and 6% had high transduction ratio. The ORR was 76% (64% complete response [CR]) for C1, 53% (36% CR) for C2, and 82% (54% CR) for ZUMA-1 C1+2. Median OS was 23.8 mo (95% CI, 13.5 - NE) for C1 and not reached (95% CI, 3.4 - NE) for C2, respectively. ORR and OS were consistent in C2 OOS subgroups (Table). Grade ≥ 3 AEs were reported in 88% and 89% of C1 and C2 pts, respectively. Grade ≥ 3 CRS (Lee et al, Blood. 2014) was not observed in C1 but was reported in 3% of C2 pts (13% in ZUMA-1 C1+2). Grade ≥ 3 neurologic events (NEs) occurred in 36% and 19% of pts in C1 and C2, respectively, and 28% of pts in ZUMA-1 C1+2. No Grade 5 CRS or NEs occurred in C1 or C2. All CRS and NEs resolved in C1, and most CRS (29/30) and NEs (19/24) resolved in C2 as of the data cutoff. Of 3 Grade 5 AEs in C1, 2 were unrelated to axi-cel (clostridial sepsis [on Day (D) 6] and respiratory failure [on D212]) and 1 was related to conditioning (myelodysplastic syndrome [on D563]). Of 3 Grade 5 AEs in C2, 2 were unrelated to axi-cel (multiple organ dysfunction syndrome [on D6] and cardiac arrest [on D482]) and 1 was related to axi-cel (systemic mycosis [on D30]). Median peak CAR T cell levels and median CAR T cell expansion (area under the curve in the first 28 days) were lower in ZUMA-9 C2 (n = 32/36; 12 cells/µL [range, 0 - 442] and 112 cells/µL × days [range, 0 - 3413]) vs ZUMA-1 C1+2 (n = 96/101; 42 cells/µL [range, 1 - 1514] and 462 cells/µL × days [range, 5 - 14,329]). Serum IFN-γ levels peaked within 8 days after axi-cel infusion (median, 170 pg/mL [range, 8 - 1876]) and were lower vs ZUMA-1 C1+2 (median, 477 pg/mL [range, 8 - 8209]). Axi-cel in ZUMA-9 C2 contained fewer, less differentiated CCR7+ naïve and central memory T cells, and a greater proportion of more differentiated CCR7- effector memory and effector T cells vs ZUMA-1 C1+2. No cases of replication-competent retroviruses were reported in C1 or C2. Conclusion: Axi-cel treatment demonstrated a manageable safety profile and meaningful clinical benefit in this expanded access and OOS product study. While CAR T cell therapy showed clinical benefit in C2 (OOS product), the lower CR rate was corroborated by lower CAR T cell expansion and a more differentiated product vs ZUMA-1 C1+2, warranting further investigation. ZUMA-9 C2 is enrolling pts and evaluation is ongoing. Disclosures Jacobson: Precision Biosciences: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel support; Celgene/BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel support; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel support; AXIS: Speakers Bureau; Nkarta: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel support; Clinical Care Options: Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Research Funding; Lonza: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel support; Kite, a Gilead Company: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel support. Locke:Calibr: Consultancy; Kite, a Gilead Company: Consultancy, Research Funding; Wugen: Consultancy; GammaDelta Therapeutics: Consultancy; Celgene/Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Cellular Biomedicine Group: Other: Consultancy with grant options; Allogene: Consultancy. Miklos:Adaptive Biotech: Consultancy, Other: Travel support, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Other: Travel support, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Other: Travel support, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Juno-Celgene-Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Other: Travel support, Research Funding; Allogene Therapeutics Inc.: Research Funding; Miltenyi Biotec: Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Other: Travel support; Kite-Gilead: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel support, Research Funding. Vose:Incyte: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Karyopharm Therapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria; Allogene: Honoraria; Loxo: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Miltenyi Biotec: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Epizyme: Honoraria, Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria; Kite, a Gilead Company: Honoraria, Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Verastem: Consultancy, Honoraria; Wugen: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Roche/Genetech: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other. Lin:Sorrento: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Merck: Research Funding; Vineti: Consultancy; Gamida Cells: Consultancy; Takeda: Research Funding; Kite, a Gilead Company: Consultancy, Research Funding; Legend BioTech: Consultancy; Juno: Consultancy; Bluebird Bio: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding. Budde:Roche: Consultancy; Merck: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; Kite, a Gilead Company: Consultancy; Gilead Sciences: Consultancy; Mustang Therapeutics: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Research Funding. Maloney:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; A2 Biotherapeutics: Consultancy, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Honoraria; Gilead Sciences: Consultancy, Honoraria; Juno Therapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Patents & Royalties: Patents are pending, but not issued, licensed, no royalties, no licensees., Research Funding; Bioline Rx: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Honoraria; MorphoSys: Consultancy, Honoraria; Genentech: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Kite, a Gilead Company: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Jaglowski:Juno: Consultancy; Kite, a Gilead Company: Consultancy, Research Funding; CRISPR: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding. Riedell:MorphoSys: Research Funding; Kite/Gilead: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bayer: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Karyopharm Therapeutics: Consultancy; Celgene/Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Perales:Celgene: Honoraria; MolMed: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Omeros: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bellicum: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kite/Gilead: Honoraria, Research Funding; Miltenyi Biotec: Research Funding; Merck: Consultancy, Honoraria; Nektar Therapeutics: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Cidara Therapeutics: Other; Servier: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other; Medigene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other; NexImmune: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte Corporation: Honoraria, Research Funding. Kim:Gilead Sciences: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Kite, a Gilead Company: Current Employment. Kawashima:Kite, a Gilead Company: Current Employment; Gilead Sciences: Other: stock or other ownership . Yang:Kite, a Gilead Company: Current Employment. Rossi:Kite, a Gilead Company: Current Employment; Gilead Sciences: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Goyal:Kite, a Gilead Company: Current Employment. Neelapu:Legend Biotech: Other; Allogene Therapeutics: Other: personal fees, Research Funding; Cell Medica/Kuur: Other: personal fees; Incyte: Other: personal fees; Unum Therapeutics: Other, Research Funding; Adicet Bio: Other; Novartis: Other: personal fees; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Other: personal fees, Research Funding; Merck: Other: personal fees, Research Funding; Kite, a Gilead Company: Other: personal fees, Research Funding; Precision Biosciences: Other: personal fees, Research Funding; Poseida: Research Funding; Calibr: Other; Acerta: Research Funding; Takeda Pharmaceuticals: Patents & Royalties; Celgene: Other: personal fees, Research Funding; Pfizer: Other: personal fees; Karus Therapeutics: Research Funding; Cellectis: Research Funding; N/A: Other.

Background: Allogeneic transplantation (allo-HCT) is a potentially curative treatment for a variety of hematologic malignancies and nonmalignant hematologic disorders. Allo-HCT from a haploidentical (Haplo) related donor has emerged as a suitable alternative in the absence of matched related donor (MRD) and matched unrelated donor (MUD). Haplo HCT patients however have higher risk of graft rejection and graft versus-host disease (GVHD). Thus, patients often receive post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy), which has proven to be highly effective in reducing GVHD. While the use of peripheral blood is an attractive option due to the ease of collection and rapid peripheral blood count recovery, not much information is available on the impact of graft sources using PTCy in Haplo-HCT. This study compares outcomes of bone marrow (BM) versus peripheral blood (PB) stem cell graft for Haplo-HCT in adult patients. Methods: We performed a retrospective study of 81 adult patients who underwent Haplo-HCT at The Ohio State University from 2009 to 2018. The study endpoints were overall survival (OS), progression free survival (PFS), non-relapse mortality (NRM), relapse, engraftment, acute GVHD (grade II-IV), and chronic GVHD. All endpoints were measured from the time of transplantation. Patient, disease, and transplant-related characteristics were compared between the two groups (BM versus PB) using the Mann-Whitney U test for continuous variables, and chi-squared or Fisher's exact test for categorical variables. The probabilities of OS and PFS were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier (KM) method and compared using log-rank test. Cumulative incidence rates were estimated and compared using Gray's test accounting for competing risks. Results: We compared the outcomes of patients who received a BM graft (N=43) with those receiving a PB graft (N=38). The median age at transplant was 57 years (20-74). All patients received PTCy in addition to tacrolimus and mycophenolate in 91% of patients. Reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) was used in majority of patients (N=63, 78%). The two groups were comparable including age (median, 60 years for BM and 56 years for PB, p=0.60) and the type of conditioning regimen (79% RIC for BM, 76% RIC for PB, p=0.77). The number of CD34+ and CD3+ infused cells was higher in PB grafts (median, 8.6x106 CD34+ cells/Kg, 2.0 x108 CD3+ cells/Kg, respectively) than for BM (median, 3.7x106 CD34+cells/Kg, 0.4x108 CD3+cells/Kg, respectively). Time to neutrophil and platelet engraftment were significantly shorter in patients receiving PB versus those getting BM grafts: median 15 vs. 17.5 days, (p=0.02) and median 20 vs. 29 days (p Conclusion: Our study suggests peripheral blood for haploidentical transplant to be a good alternative to bone marrow. Similar PFS, OS and NRM were seen between the two graft sources. As expected, faster neutrophil and platelets engraftment were seen with PB due to more CD3+ and CD34+ infused, but without an increase in acute or chronic GVHD. A reduced relapse risk was observed with PB graft. Our study is small and is retrospective, but provide encouraging results. A prospective randomized controlled trial is required to confirm these results. Disclosures Chaudhry: Sanofi: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Bumma:Sanofi: Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Speakers Bureau. Khan:Amgen: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy. Devarakonda:Janssen: Consultancy. Vasu:Kiadis Inc: Other: Kiadis has obtained exclusive licensing requirements from The OHio State University; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Omeros: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Jaglowski:Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Juno: Consultancy; Kite, a Gilead Company: Consultancy, Research Funding; CRISPR: Consultancy. William:Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Dova: Research Funding; Kyowa Kirin: Consultancy, Honoraria; Guidepoint Global: Consultancy; Incyte: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria. Mims:Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Other: Data Safety Monitoring Board; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Syndax Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kura Oncology: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Leukemia and Lymphoma Society: Other: Senior Medical Director for Beat AML Study; Agios: Consultancy; Novartis: Speakers Bureau. Brammer:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Kymera: Honoraria; Verastem Oncology: Other: Travel. Saad:Amgen: Other: research support; Magenta Therapeutics: Other: Personal Fees; Incyte Pharmaceuticals: Other: Personal Fees; Orcabio: Other: research support; Kadmon: Other: research support. Efebera:Celgene: Research Funding; Ohio State University: Current Employment; Takeda: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding.

B ackground Premature death from opioid-related causes imposes an enormous public health burden across the United States. Between 2001 and 2016, the number of opioid-related deaths in the United States increased by 345%, from 9489 to 42 245 deaths (33.3 to 130.7 deaths per million population. Moreover, opioids may have immunosuppressive properties independent of their psychotropic effects; opioid use has been associated with increased invasive pneumococcal disease in a nested case-control study of 1233 Medicaid patients from Tennessee. In liver transplant recipients, opioid use disorder has been associated with increased mortality after transplant. The impact of opioid use disorder on patients receiving blood and marrow transplant (BMT) remains to be defined. Methods We performed a retrospective analysis of all consecutive adult patients who had BMT (autologous and allogeneic) from 1/1/2008 through 1/1/2018 at the James Comprehensive Cancer Center. Overall survival (OS) was measured from the date of transplant to the date of death, censoring at date of last follow up if alive. Progression free survival (PFS) was measured from the date of transplant to the date of disease progression or the date of death, whichever occurred first, censoring at last follow up if no event. OS and PFS were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. Opioid use (OU) was defined as a binary yes/no variable if an opioid was prescribed upon discharge from the hospital after BMT. The impact of OU, along with other patient, disease, and BMT related factors, on PFS/OS, was analyzed using Cox regression method. Results A total of 1585 patients were included in the analysis (Table 1). The median age at BMT was 58 (range=18-79) years; 59% were males; 60% had autologous transplants; and 58% were prescribed opioids upon discharge from the hospital. OU was significantly more in patients who were younger, have had allogeneic transplant, reduced intensity conditioning, had acute myeloid leukemia (AML), or higher BMT comorbidity index (CMI). On univariable analysis, OU was not associated with cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) or PFS however it was associated with inferior OS; hazard ratio (HR)=1.25, 95% CI: 1.06-1.49; p=0.01 (Figure-1). There were no differences in CIR, PFS, or OS when autologous and allogeneic transplants were analyzed separately. Upon multivariable analysis of OS, OU lost statistical significance after controlling for age, diagnosis, type of transplant, intensity of conditioning regimen, CMI, and disease risk index (DRE). Of interest, OU independently predicted for superior OS at 100 days and 365 days post-BMT; HR=0.29, 95% CI 0.16-0.50 (p= Conclusion: Our results suggest that opioid use (OU) may have a long term negative impact on survival in BMT patients. The apparently protective effects of OU early on after BMT is elusive but may be possibly related immunomodulatory effects of opioids. A major limitation of our study is that OU is analyzed at a single time point at hospital discharge after BMT. We plan to undertake a more detailed analysis of ongoing OU after discharge and its impact on survival outcomes after BMT. Disclosures Brammer: Celgene Corporation: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Speakers Bureau. Efebera:Celgene: Research Funding; Ohio State University: Current Employment; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Mims:Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Other: Data Safety Monitoring Board; Syndax Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kura Oncology: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Leukemia and Lymphoma Society: Other: Senior Medical Director for Beat AML Study; Agios: Consultancy; Novartis: Speakers Bureau. Chaudhry:Sanofi: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Bumma:Sanofi: Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Speakers Bureau. Khan:Amgen: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy. Devarakonda:Janssen: Consultancy. Jaglowski:Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; CRISPR: Consultancy; Juno: Consultancy; Kite, a Gilead Company: Consultancy, Research Funding. William:Kyowa Kirin: Consultancy, Honoraria; Merck: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Guidepoint Global: Consultancy; Dova: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria.

Introduction Allogeneic HCT is the only established curative therapy for high risk hematologic malignancies. The major challenges are leukemia relapse and high grade GVHD. We have developed the CD24Fc fusion protein to selectively inhibit danger-associated molecular pattern (DAMP)-induced inflammation and discovered that it effectively prevents GVHD without affecting the desirable GVL effect in preclinical models. With the support of SBIR awards from the NCI, we have completed a phase II randomized, double blind, multi-center, dose escalation trial comprised of 3 dosing cohorts of 8 patients (3:1 CD24Fc vs. placebo), with a total enrollment of 24 subjects. Notably, clinical data from this trial demonstrate that CD24Fc reduces the incidence of severe GVHD, resulting in statistically significant increases of acute 180-day GVHD-free survival (aGFS). A Phase II expansion cohort to enroll an additional 20 subject is ongoing (NCT02663622). Here we propose a phase III clinical trial with 180 patients (1:1 CD24Fc vs placebo) to test the hypothesis that CD24Fc prophylaxis can significantly improve 180 day acute GVHD-free survival (aGFS) over placebo control. Study Design A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Multi-Center, Phase III Study of CD24Fc for the Prevention of Acute GVHD Following Myeloablative Allogeneic HCT (CATHY) (NCT04095858). This study will compare CD24Fc or Placebo with standard GVHD prophylaxis of tacrolimus and methotrexate in the setting of myeloablative conditioning (MAC), matched unrelated donor (MUD) allogeneic HCT in patients with AML/ALL or MDS. Patients will be randomized 1:1 to receive CD24Fc or placebo at the dose levels of 480mg, 240mg and 240mg on Days -1, +14 and +28, respectively. The primary endpoint is the rate of 180 days grade III-IV acute GVHD-free survival (aGFS). Secondary endpoints are 1 yr DFS, 1 yr OS, and D180 Gr II-IV aGFS. Other exploratory evaluations will be 1 yr chronic GVHD, 1 yr relapse, NRM at 1 year, incidence and rate of infection at 100 days, and rate of Gr III and above mucositis at 28 days. The study will enroll 180 patients, or 90 per arm, with an estimated accrual period of 24 months. Statistical Consideration The study will include one interim analysis for efficacy. Z test statistics for comparing the two arms will be compared to the critical values and results be reviewed by the independent DSMB.

Background: Consolidation therapy with allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) is recommended to prevent relapse and improve survival in patients with intermediate and poor risk acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). Due to toxicity, older patients with comorbidities were historically not candidates for HSCT. The development of reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) regimens has allowed more patients to proceed to HSCT by reducing toxicities associated with myeloablative conditioning (MAC).The cornerstone of reducing conditioning regimen intensity is modification of busulfan exposure, expressed as an area under the curve (AUC). This can be achieved by the use of patient-specific pharmacokinetic targets. Previous studies (including BMT CTN 0901) have demonstrated RIC regimens were associated with less toxicity at the cost of potentially decreased survival relative to weight-based MAC regimens. At OSU, we have utilized an AUC target of 4,000 μmol-min/L per day x 4 days in a subset of patients to balance reduced toxicity with risk of relapse. Here we compare outcomes of AUC 4,000 to weight-based RIC Flu/Bu2. Methods: To compare the two regimens, a retrospective, IRB-approved cohort study was conducted. The inclusion criteria were as follows: age 18-89 years, HSCT for a diagnosis of AML or MDS, and fludarabine + busulfan conditioning regimen ± antithymocyte globulin. In the AUC 4,000 group, the target busulfan exposure was 16,000 μmol-min/L divided over 4 daily doses. In the RIC group, patents received busulfan 0.8 mg/kg/dose for 8 doses (Flu/Bu2). The primary outcome was relapse free survival (RFS). Secondary outcomes included overall survival (OS); time to neutrophil recovery; time to platelet recovery; incidence of acute and chronic graft vs host disease (GVHD); sinusoidal obstructive syndrome; febrile neutropenia; graft failure; and grade 3-5 mucositis, acute kidney injury, or hepatic dysfunction. The log-rank test was used to compare RFS and OS, and Cox proportional hazard regression model was used to estimate the hazard ratio. Gray's test was used for competing risks analysis of relapse, acute GVHD, and chronic GVHD. Fine and Gray regression models were used to estimate the hazard ratio. Results: Seventy-four patients who received conditioning from 2015-2018 with either AUC 4,000 or RIC were identified. Disease type was similar between groups with 61.8% AML in the AUC 4,000 group and 52.5% in the RIC group. There were no significant differences in disease risk status. In the AUC 4,000 group, 17.6% had either AML with myelodysplastic changes or therapy-related AML/MDS, compared to 17.5% in the RIC group. The percent of patients with HCT-Comorbidity Index score of ≥ 3 was 52.9% for AUC 4,000 and 77.5% for RIC. At 18 months, RFS was not significantly different, at 66.9% with AUC 4,000 compared to 57.5% with RIC (p=0.37) (A). Eighteen-month overall survival was also not significantly different with 66.9% alive in the AUC 4,000 group and 60% in the RIC group (p=0.63) (B). Cumulative incidence of acute and chronic GVHD were not significantly different (p=0.82, p=0.18, respectively) (C,D). There was, however, a statistically significant difference in the cumulative incidence of relapse over 18 months in favor of the AUC 4,000 regimen (hazard ratio 4.08, 95% confidence interval 1.15-14.5) (E). Grade 2-4 mucositis was more common in the AUC 4,000 group (85.3% vs 30%, p Discussion: Though no significant difference existed in disease risk between the groups, choice of regimen was driven by physician judgement, perceived fitness, and ability to tolerate potential adverse effects. Thus, the results of this study indicate that with patient selection, there is no significant RFS or OS difference, or risk of acute or chronic GVHD between targeted AUC 4,000 and RIC. However, AUC 4,000 was associated with a significantly lower cumulative incidence of relapse. Adverse effects other than mucositis were not significantly different between groups. In order to definitively compare these two conditioning regimens, a prospective study is needed. Figure Disclosures Brammer: Verastem, Inc: Research Funding; Viracta Therapeutics, Inc.: Research Funding; Bioniz Therapeutics, Inc.: Research Funding. Jaglowski:Kite: Consultancy, Other: advisory board, Research Funding; Juno: Consultancy, Other: advisory board; Unum Therapeutics Inc.: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Other: advisory board, Research Funding. Mims:Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astellas Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; PTC Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Agios Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Vasu:Boehringer Ingelheim: Other: Travel support; Seattle Genetics: Other: Clinical trial support. William:Guidepoint Global: Consultancy; Techspert: Consultancy; Celgene Corporation: Consultancy; Kyowa Kirin, Inc.: Consultancy; Defined Health: Consultancy. Saad:Actinium Pharma Inc: Consultancy; Amgen: Other: Research Support; Kadmon: Other: Research Support; OrcaBio: Other: Research Support.

Background Haplo-HCT emerged as a reliable option for patients with high risk hematological malignancies with no HLA-matched related or unrelated donors available. Retrospective registry data suggest comparable outcomes to HLA-matched donors; however, relatively little is known regarding predictors of disease relapse following haplo-HCT. We hypothesize that attainment of full-donor CD3 and CD33 chimerism at day 30 (D30) and 100 (D100) is associated with lower incidence of relapse after haplo-HCT. Methods We undertook a retrospective analysis of 78 patients who underwent haplo-HCT at the Ohio State University James Cancer Hospital between January 2013 and December 2017. The associations between patient characteristics including CD3/CD33 donor chimerisms and the cumulative incidence rate (CIR) of relapse were evaluated using proportional sub-distribution hazards model, treating death without relapse as the competing risk. The models were built adopting a landmark analysis approach at D30 and D100. Progression-free survival (PFS) was estimated using the method of Kaplan-Meier. Results Median age at haplo-HCT was 56 (20-74) years and 68% were males. 50% had acute myeloid leukemia/myelodysplastic syndrome, and 54% had intermediate disease risk index (DRI). Most patients (85%) received reduced-intensity conditioning and 50% received bone marrow (BM) grafts. Complete (100%) CD3 donor chimerism was observed in 63 (84%) patients at D30, and subsequently 59 (95%) patients at D100. Complete CD33 donor chimerism was observed in 67 (89%) patients at D30, and subsequently 56 (88%) patients at D100. In univariable D30 landmark analysis, the CIR of relapse was significantly lower in patients who achieved complete CD3 (and CD33) chimerism compared with patients with less than complete chimerism (Figure 1A; p Conclusions Complete CD3 and CD33 donor chimerisms at D30 and D100 predict a patient's risk for relapse following haplo-HCT. We observed a strong association between CD3 chimeric status at D30 with DRI, as well suggestive that high risk disease may be associated with impaired immune reconstitution after transplant and perhaps a less robust graft vs disease effect.

Danger-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) released during conditioning have been shown to amplify experimental GVHD. CD24 fusion protein (CD24Fc; OncoImmune), a glycoprotein linked to human IgG1 Fc, binds to Siglec-10 to negatively regulate host response to DAMPs. We have reported that infusion of CD24Fc prior to HCT significantly decreased GVHD-related mortality in murine models of HCT (Toubai, Blood 2015 & Toubai, JCI Insight 2017). We hypothesized that enhancing Siglec10-CD24 interactions by administration of CD24Fc would prevent acute GVHD. A randomized, prospective, multi-site, placebo controlled phase 2a clinical trial was initiated to investigate safety of three dose levels of CD24Fc (or blinded placebo) plus standard GVHD prophylaxis with tacrolimus and methotrexate (MTX) in matched unrelated donors. T cell replete PBSC or BMT was infused. Randomization (3:1 ratio of CD24Fc:Placebo) was in 3 cohorts of 8 pts: 240mg single dose on D -1, 480mg single dose on D -1, and a 480mg, 240mg, and 240mg multiple dose regimen on D -1, 14 and 28, respectively. The primary endpoint was safety and determination of a recommended dose. Pts were followed for secondary endpoints of aGVHD, relapse and survival at D180. The trial enrolled 24 pts (CD24Fc, n=18; Placebo, n=6) with minimum follow up on one year (Table1). All planned dosages were administered without reaching an MTD. There were no infusion-related toxicities or DLTs. In placebo treated pts, there was one DLT resulting in death from pneumonia. Between groups there were no overall differences in AEs, although CD24Fc was associated with fewer days of severe (≥ Grade III) mucositis. There was no infection-related mortality related to CD24Fc treatment. The CD24Fc pts achieved neutrophil and platelet engraftment at a median of D 13 (12-23) and D 13 (9-23), respectively. PK studies demonstrated sustained drug levels through D 100 in the multi-dosing cohort. The incidence of grade II-IV GVHD was 39% (18-62%) and III-IV GVHD was 6% (95% CI 0-20%) at D 180 among CD24Fc treated pts. Grade 3 involvement of the lower-GI tract was observed in 1/18 pts, while the remainder of acute GVHD involved the upper GI tract or skin. All pts receiving treatment for GVHD experienced response. At D 180, relapse occurred in 2/18 pts, and OS was 100%. The endpoint of grade 3-4 GVHD-free survival (AGFS) was 94% at D 180 in pts receiving treatment with CD24Fc versus 50% in pts receiving placebo (HR 0.1; 90% CI 0.0-0.7). AGFS in contemporaneous case matched controls (n=68; CIBMTR) receiving myeloablative 8/8 HLA matched unrelated donor HCT with tacrolimus + MTX was 68% (95% CI: 56-78). In this translational phase 2a trial administration of CD24Fc was safe and tolerable. Additional investigations are required determine efficacy for improving AGFS after HCT. This trial represents the first attempt to prevent GVHD by inhibiting host response to DAMPs.

Ibrutinib, a potent and irreversible small-molecule inhibitor of both Bruton's tyrosine kinase and interleukin-2 inducible kinase (ITK), has been used to treat relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) with prolongation of progression-free and overall survival. Here, we present 27 patients with relapsed CLL following allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) who subsequently received ibrutinib salvage therapy. Sixteen of these patients were part of multi-institutional clinical trials and achieved an overall response rate of 87.5%. An additional 11 patients were treated at Stanford University following US Food and Drug Administration approval of ibrutinib; 7 (64%) achieved a complete response, and 3 (27%) achieved a partial response. Of the 9 patients treated at Stanford who had mixed chimerism-associated CLL relapse, 4 (44%) converted to full donor chimerism following ibrutinib initiation, in association with disease response. Four of 11 (36%) patients evaluated by ClonoSeq achieved minimal residual disease negativity with CLL1/10 000 white blood cells, which persisted even after ibrutinib was discontinued, in 1 case even after 26 months. None of the 27 patients developed graft-versus-host-disease (GVHD) following ibrutinib initiation. We postulate that ibrutinib augments the graft-versus-leukemia (GVL) benefit through a T-cell-mediated effect, most likely due to ITK inhibition. To investigate the immune modulatory effects of ibrutinib, we completed comprehensive immune phenotype characterization of peripheral B and T cells from treated patients. Our results show that ibrutinib selectively targets pre-germinal B cells and depletes Th2 helper cells. Furthermore, these effects persisted after drug discontinuation. In total, our results provide evidence that ibrutinib effectively augments GVL without causing GVHD.

Previously reported experimental and clinical data suggest that proteasome inhibition may have immunomodulatory activity relevant to graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). To explore the safety and activity of carfilzomib in advanced chronic GVHD, we conducted a multicenter pilot phase II trial through the Chronic GVHD Consortium. Carfilzomib was administered at 20 mg/m

Autologous T cells engineered to express a CD19-specific chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) have produced impressive minimal residual disease–negative (MRD-negative) complete remission (CR) rates in patients with relapsed/refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL). However, the factors associated with durable remissions after CAR T-cell therapy have not been fully elucidated. We studied patients with relapsed/refractory B-ALL enrolled in a phase 1/2 clinical trial evaluating lymphodepletion chemotherapy followed by CD19 CAR T-cell therapy at our institution. Forty-five (85%) of 53 patients who received CD19 CAR T-cell therapy and were evaluable for response achieved MRD-negative CR by high-resolution flow cytometry. With a median follow-up of 30.9 months, event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) were significantly better in the patients who achieved MRD-negative CR compared with those who did not (median EFS, 7.6 vs 0.8 months; P < .0001; median OS, 20.0 vs 5.0 months; P = .014). In patients who achieved MRD-negative CR by flow cytometry, absence of the index malignant clone by IGH deep sequencing was associated with better EFS (P = .034). Stepwise multivariable modeling in patients achieving MRD-negative CR showed that lower prelymphodepletion lactate dehydrogenase concentration (hazard ratio [HR], 1.38 per 100 U/L increment increase), higher prelymphodepletion platelet count (HR, 0.74 per 50 000/μL increment increase), incorporation of fludarabine into the lymphodepletion regimen (HR, 0.25), and allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) after CAR T-cell therapy (HR, 0.39) were associated with better EFS. These data allow identification of patients at higher risk of relapse after CAR T-cell immunotherapy who might benefit from consolidation strategies such as allogeneic HCT. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01865617.

Post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) can be used as the sole immunosuppression after myeloablative conditioning (MAC) for HLA-matched bone marrow transplantation (BMT). However, the effects of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) with this platform are undefined. We retrospectively analyzed 298 consecutive adult patients with hematologic malignancies who engrafted after MAC HLA-matched sibling donor (MSD; n = 187) or HLA-matched unrelated donor (MUD; n = 111) T-cell-replete BMT with PTCy 50 mg/kg on days +3 and +4. After MSD and MUD BMT, 35% and 57% of patients, respectively, developed grade II acute GVHD (aGVHD) by 100 days, 11% and 14% grade III to IV aGVHD by 100 days, and 9% and 16% chronic GVHD (cGVHD) by 1 year. In landmark analyses at 100 days after HLA-matched BMT, 4-year overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were 57% (95% confidence interval [CI], .49 to .67) and 40% (95% CI, .31 to .51) in patients without grades II to IV aGVHD, and 68% (95% CI, .59 to .78) and 54% (95% CI, .44 to .65) in patients with grade II aGVHD. In adjusted time-dependent multivariable analyses, grade II aGVHD was associated with improved OS (hazard ratio, .58; 95% CI, .37 to .89; P = .01) and PFS (hazard ratio, .50; 95% CI, .34 to .74; P < .001) after HLA-matched BMT with PTCy. The ability of PTCy to limit grades III to IV aGVHD and cGVHD while maintaining grade II aGVHD may contribute to its effectiveness, and further attempts to reduce aGVHD may be detrimental.

Chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) is a life-threatening complication of allogeneic stem cell transplantation. In a Phase 1b/2, open-label study (PCYC-1129; ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02195869) involving 42 patients with active cGVHD who were steroid-dependent or -refractory, the activity and safety of ibrutinib, a once-daily inhibitor of Bruton's tyrosine kinase, was demonstrated. Here we report extended follow-up for patients in this study. After a median follow-up of 26 months (range, .53 to 36.7 months), best overall response rate in the all treated population was 69% (29 of 42), with 13 patients (31%) achieving a complete response and 16 patients (38%) achieving a partial response. Sustained responses of ≥20, ≥32, and ≥44 weeks were seen in 20 (69%), 18 (62%), and 16 (55%) of the 29 responders, respectively. Of 26 patients with ≥2 involved organs, 19 (73%) showed responses in ≥2 organs. Six of 10 patients (60%) with ≥3 involved organs showed responses in ≥3 organs. Eleven of 18 patients (61%) who had sclerosis at baseline showed a sclerotic response (39% with complete response, 22% with partial response). Twenty-seven of 42 patients (64%) reached a corticosteroid dose of.15 mg/kg/day during the study; 8 discontinued corticosteroid treatment and remained off corticosteroid at study closure. Safety findings for this updated analysis were consistent with the safety profile seen at the time of the original analysis. Common grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs) were pneumonia (n = 6), fatigue (n = 5), and diarrhea (n = 4). The onset of new grade ≥3 AEs decreased from 71% in the first year of treatment to 25% in the second year (n = 12). AEs leading to discontinuation occurred in 18 patients (43%). At a median follow-up of2 years, ibrutinib continued to produce durable responses in patients with cGVHD who had failed previous systemic therapy. In this pretreated, high-risk population, clinically meaningful benefit and an acceptable safety profile were observed with additional follow-up for ibrutinib. These results demonstrate a substantial advance in the therapeutic management of patients with cGVHD.

High-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant (AHSCT) is a standard of care for patients with relapsed Hodgkin lymphoma. Different conditioning regimens before AHSCT have been used, with the 2 most common being BEAM (carmustine, etoposide, cytarabine, and melphalan) and BUCYVP16 (busulfan, cyclophosphamide, and etoposide). We retrospectively compared the outcomes of patients treated with BEAM (n = 128) or BUCYVP16 (n = 105) followed by AHSCT. After a median follow-up of 4.2 years for BEAM and 3.8 for BUCYVP16 from AHSCT, the 5-year cumulative incidence of relapse was 29% with BEAM compared with 56% with BUCYVP16 (P.001). Median progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were not reached with BEAM and were 2.0 and 7.8 years with BUCYVP16, respectively. Improved PFS (P.001) and OS (P = .001) were observed with BEAM for patients who needed transplant within 24 months from diagnosis and for patients not in complete remission (non-CR; P = .001 and P.001, respectively) at AHSCT. In this large retrospective comparison the use of BEAM conditioning before AHSCT resulted in a statistically significant improved PFS and OS and lower relapse compared with BUCYVP16. This supports the use of BEAM as a frontline conditioning regimen before AHSCT for early relapsed and non-CR Hodgkin lymphoma.

7547 Background: KTE-X19 is an autologous anti-CD19 CAR T-cell therapy approved in the US and EU for the treatment of R/R MCL. In the ZUMA-2 study of KTE-X19 in R/R MCL, the objective response rate (ORR) at a median 17.5-mo follow-up was 92% (67% complete responses [CR]; Wang et al. ASH 2020 #1120). Here, we report results in pts with or w/o POD24, an indicator of poor outcomes (Visco et al. Br J Haematol 2019). Methods: Eligible pts with R/R MCL underwent leukapheresis and conditioning chemotherapy followed by a single infusion of KTE-X19. Efficacy results are reported for the 60 treated pts with ≥1 y of follow-up (median 17.5 mo); safety results are presented for all 68 treated pts. Results: High-risk disease characteristics were common in pts with (n=33) and w/o POD24 (n=35), although pts with POD24 had higher tumor burden and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels, and more had blastoid type MCL (Table). ORR in pts with (n=28) and w/o POD24 (n=32) was 93% and 91%, with CR rates of 61% and 72%. In pts with and w/o POD24, median progression-free survival (PFS) was 11.3 mo (range, 0.9–30.3) and 29.3 mo (range, 0–35.9). Medians for duration of response (DOR) and overall survival (OS) were not reached in either group. Most common Grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs) in pts with vs w/o POD24 were neutropenia (91% vs 80%), thrombocytopenia (61% vs 46%), and anemia (55% vs 51%); Grade ≥3 cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and neurologic events occurred in 9% vs 20% and 27% vs 34%, respectively. There were no cases of Grade 5 CRS, KTE-X19–related secondary cancers, or replication-competent retrovirus in either group. In pts with vs w/o POD24, median peak CAR T-cell levels and median area under the curve were 53.4 cells/µL (range, 0.2–2566) and 583.4 cells/µL (range, 1.8–27,743.6) vs 112.4 cells/µL (range, 0.2–2589) and 1588.3 cells/µL (range, 3.8–27,238.7); by 12 mo, B cells were detectable in 8/11 (73%) vs 7/15 pts (47%) in ongoing response. Conclusions: KTE-X19 provided a high CR rate across all pts, with median DOR and OS not reached. Pts with POD24 had more aggressive high-risk disease characteristics (tumor burden, LDH levels, and blastoid MCL) and generally lower CAR T-cell expansion and PFS vs pts w/o POD24. Earlier intervention with CD19-directed CAR T-cell therapy may benefit pts with MCL with known high-risk factors. Clinical trial information: NCT02601313. [Table: see text]

e19026 Background: The USFDA has recently approved several oral targeted therapies for the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia (AML). The relative survival impact of these agents vs standard induction chemotherapy in the frontline setting is unknown, especially in patients who undergo allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT). Methods: This is a retrospective, single-institution study of 125 patients with AML diagnosed 2015-2020 who received HCT. Patients were included if induced with high intensity chemotherapy (HiC) or lower intensity targeted therapy (LITT). HiC was defined as cytarabine + anthracycline given on a “7+3” based schedule. LITT was defined as venetoclax, gilteritinib, enasidenib, or ivosidenib alone or combined with hypomethylating agent. Patients receiving liposomal cytarabine-daunorubicin were excluded. Outcomes of interest were overall survival (OS), non-relapse mortality (NRM), and cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR). Between-groups analysis was conducted comparing receipt of any HiC to LITT only. OS was analyzed by Kaplan-Meier method and compared using log-rank test; NRM and CIR was estimated through cumulative incidence function and compared by Fine-Gray test. Results: Of 125 HCT recipients, 108 received any HiC and 17 LITT only. Two patients received HiC after suboptimal response to LITT. Median age at HCT was 61 years, 48% were female, and 90% were in complete remission at HCT. Population characteristics and outcomes as well as between-groups comparison are presented in the table. LITT only group was older with longer time to HCT and exclusively received RIC. With median follow-up of 23 months, median OS had not been reached. There were no statistically significant differences in median OS or one-year NRM or CIR between groups. Conclusions: Despite differences in age, conditioning regimen, and time to HCT in patients receiving any HiC vs LITT only, we have shown similar OS, CIR, and NRM. Difference in age is in contrast to lack of difference in HCT-CI and KPS, but is partially explained by limited access to LITT for younger patients. Longer time to HCT among LITT only recipients represents a major opportunity for pre-HCT optimization of recipient health. Prospective study from time of diagnosis will be important to understanding the appropriate use of LITT in HCT-eligible patients.[Table: see text]

e19559 Background: Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CART) therapies lead to durable disease control in patients (pts) with relapsed/refractory (R/R) Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma (DLBCL). We assessed the prognostic value of response on first staging scan, and whether pts with progression of disease (PD) convert to a response on second scan. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of pts with R/R DLBCL treated with CART at our institute. Baseline characteristics were assessed at apheresis. We included staging scans (CT, PET-CT and MRI) that occurred up to 6 months (mos) after CART infusion. Responses were determined via the Lugano 2014 criteria. Overall survival (OS) was calculated from first scan to last follow-up. Kaplan Meier method and Cox model were used to correlate first scan result with OS. Results: Of the 118 pts who received CART, 111 pts had evaluable staging scans (7 passed prior to first scan). Of the 111 pts, median age was 61 years (range, 23-84), and median number of prior therapies was 3 (range, 1-7). 61 pts received tisagenlecleucel, and 50 pts received axicabtagene ciloleucel. 22% of pts had MYC rearrangement by FISH. The majority of pts were stage 3/4 (91%), with an IPI score ≥2 (82%). 32%, 66% and 2% of pts had a CT, PET-CT or MRI as their first scan respectively. After a median follow-up of 16.2 mos, median OS from first scan was not reached (NR) (95% CI, 17-NR). 37%, 5%, 32%, 25% of pts had PD, SD, PR, and CR on first scan respectively. Median time to first scan was 59 days (range, 13-115). Median OS for pts who had PD was 3 mos (95% CI 2-8), and the median OS for those who attained SD, PR or CR was NR (95% CI NR-NR). Accounting for statistically important factors on multivariate analysis, PD on first scan was an independent predictor of OS (p

We defined associations among immune cell subsets in granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF)-mobilized allografts and clinical outcomes after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT). Fresh peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) aliquots from 238 G-CSF-mobilized allografts were extensively characterized by immunophenotype. Subset-specific transplanted cells were correlated with acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD), chronic GVHD (cGVHD), malignant disease relapse, nonrelapse mortality, and overall survival. Of 238 assessable alloHCT recipients, 185 patients (78%) received reduced-intensity conditioning and 152 (64%) antithymocyte globulin-based serotherapy. Incidences of aGVHD and cGVHD were 58% and 48%, respectively. Median follow-up was 21 months (range, 1.4 to 41.1). In multivariable analyses adjusted for relevant clinical factors, allograft activated natural killer (NK) cells (CD56(+)CD16(+)CD69(+)CD158b(+)) were associated with a significantly lower risk of aGVHD (P = .0016; HR, .51; 95% confidence interval, .33 to .78), whereas late-activated HLA-DR(+) CD3(+) cells were associated with significantly higher aGVHD (P .0005; HR, 2.31; 95% confidence interval, 1.55 to 3.43). In a subgroup of patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), receipt of an allograft from an older donor (≥40 years) was associated with a higher incidence of relapse (P = .0042; HR, 2.99); allograft content of early activated CD3(+) cells (CD3(+)CD69(+); P = .0024; HR, .4) and NKT cells (CD3(+)CD56(+); P = .0006; HR, .54) were associated with a lower incidence of relapse. Presence of HLA-Bw4-80Ile(+) genotype was associated with lower relapse incidence. In conclusion, activated NK cells within PBSC allografts associate with lower aGVHD risk, whereas HLA-DR(+) T cells associate with higher aGVHD and cGVHD risk. NKT cells and early activated T cells are associated with lower relapse risk in AML and MDS patients. These findings may have implications in therapeutic targeting of select populations in the allograft to minimize incidence of GVHD.

Purpose: Cutaneous sclerosis occurs in 20% of patients with chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and can compromise mobility and quality of life. Experimental design: We conducted a prospective, multicenter, randomized, two-arm phase II crossover trial of imatinib (200 mg daily) or rituximab (375 mg/m2 i.v. weekly × 4 doses, repeatable after 3 months) for treatment of cutaneous sclerosis diagnosed within 18 months (NCT01309997). The primary endpoint was significant clinical response (SCR) at 6 months, defined as quantitative improvement in skin sclerosis or joint range of motion. Treatment success was defined as SCR at 6 months without crossover, recurrent malignancy or death. Secondary endpoints included changes of B-cell profiles in blood (BAFF levels and cellular subsets), patient-reported outcomes, and histopathology between responders and nonresponders with each therapy. Results: SCR was observed in 9 of 35 [26%; 95% confidence interval (CI); 13%–43%] participants randomized to imatinib and 10 of 37 (27%; 95% CI, 14%–44%) randomized to rituximab. Six (17%; 95% CI, 7%–34%) patients in the imatinib arm and 5 (14%; 95% CI, 5%–29%) in the rituximab arm had treatment success. Higher percentages of activated B cells (CD27+) were seen at enrollment in rituximab-treated patients who had treatment success (P = 0.01), but not in imatinib-treated patients. Conclusions: These results support the need for more effective therapies for cutaneous sclerosis and suggest that activated B cells define a subgroup of patients with cutaneous sclerosis who are more likely to respond to rituximab. Clin Cancer Res; 22(2); 319–27. ©2015 AACR.

Introduction: Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) is a potentially curative treatment for many hematological malignancies and disorders. However, this potential is often impeded by several factors including relapse of the underlying disease, graft-vs-host disease (GVHD) and infectious complications. Specifically, acute GVHD continues to be a major factor in the morbidity and mortality of patients. Hence, the practice of allo-SCT is continuously evolving to mitigate these factors. In particular, advances in the conditioning regimens, GVHD prophylaxis, infectious disease monitoring and prophylaxis and supportive care not only have resulted in improved outcomes, but also have expanded potential indications for allo-HSCT. Therefore, we conducted a retrospective analysis on patients who underwent allo-SCT at The Ohio State University from 1986-2018 to better understand how survival has changed longitudinally in accordance with these therapeutic advancements. Method: We analyzed data from 1943 consecutive patients who received an allo-SCT. Patients were divided into seven groups based on the year of transplant: groups (gp) 1: 1984-1988, 2: 1989-1993, 3: 1994-1998, 4: 1999-2003, 5: 2004-2008, 6: 2009-2013, and 7: 2014-2018. The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS), and log-rank test was used to compare across transplant years. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate OS and PFS. The secondary endpoints were the cumulative incidences of grade II-IV and grade III-IV acute GVHD (aGVHD), chronic GVHD (cGVHD), and non-relapse mortality (NRM). Cumulative incidence rates were estimated and compared using Gray's test accounting for competing risks. Results: Across the years (1984-2018), the median age was 50.0 (range: 18-76) with 59.6% of the patients being male. Acute myeloid leukemia accounted for 36.3% of transplants, followed by non-Hodgkin lymphoma (14.2%), acute lymphoid leukemia (11.8%), chronic myeloid leukemia (10.1%), and myelodysplastic syndrome (10.0%). Fifty-five percent of patients received myeloablative conditioning. Across the groups, statistically significant improvements in PFS and OS were observed (p Conclusion: Our data shows improved overall and progression-free survival post allo-SCT over decades, which may be attributed to advances in supportive care, and GVHD and relapse mitigation therapy. The decline in NRM is also likely due to improved supportive measures such as infectious disease monitoring and prophylaxis. Nonetheless, post-transplant relapse and grade III-IV aGVHD remain prominent challenges. Therefore, future research should continue to investigate therapeutic strategies that can both reduce high grade GVHD while limiting post-transplant relapse. Disclosures Chaudhry: Sanofi: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Bumma:Amgen: Speakers Bureau; Sanofi: Speakers Bureau. Khan:Amgen: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy. Devarakonda:Janssen: Consultancy. Vasu:Kiadis Inc: Other: Kiadis has obtained exclusive licensing requirements from The OHio State University; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Omeros: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Jaglowski:CRISPR: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Juno: Consultancy; Kite, a Gilead Company: Consultancy, Research Funding. William:Incyte: Research Funding; Guidepoint Global: Consultancy; Dova: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Kyowa Kirin: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria. Mims:Leukemia and Lymphoma Society: Other: Senior Medical Director for Beat AML Study; Agios: Consultancy; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Syndax Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Other: Data Safety Monitoring Board; Kura Oncology: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Speakers Bureau. Brammer:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Kymera: Honoraria; Verastem Oncology: Other: Travel. Saad:Incyte Pharmaceuticals: Other: Personal Fees; Amgen: Other: research support; Kadmon: Other: research support; Orcabio: Other: research support; Magenta Therapeutics: Other: Personal Fees. Efebera:Celgene: Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Ohio State University: Current Employment.

Introduction: Allogeneic stem cell transplant (allo-SCT) plays a key role in the post-remission therapy for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients due to its high rates of efficacy as compared to alternate therapies. For patients with relapsed/refractory AML and those with high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), it remains the sole curative option. However, these patients continue to have significant obstacles for successful transplant including risk for relapse of underlying disease, graft versus host disease (GVHD), and infectious complications. Outcomes of allo-SCT in these patients have improved over time with the evolution of practice of allo-SCT, including modifications of transplant conditioning regimens, supportive care, and earlier recognition of transplant complications. Our study sought to assess the trends in survival in AML and MDS patients undergoing allogeneic transplant at The Ohio State University from 1984-2018. Methods: We analyzed data from 900 consecutive patients who received an allo-SCT (705 AML and 195 MDS). The patients were stratified into 7 different groups based on year of transplant using 5 year increments; group (gp) 1 included 1984-1988, gp 2 1989-1993, gp 3 1994-1998, gp 4 1999-2003, gp 5 2004-2008, gp 6 2009-2013, and gp 7 2014-2018. Progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were utilized as primary end points. PFS and OS were calculated using Kaplan Meier Curves. Secondary endpoints included cumulative incidences of grade II-IV and III-IV acute GVHD (aGVHD), chronic GVHD (cGVHD), and non-relapse mortality (NRM). Cumulative incidence rates were estimated and compared using Gray's test accounting for competing risks. Results: Median age at transplant was 52 years (yrs) old (range 18-76) and 55.6% were male. Patients having myeloablative (MA) conditioning regimen comprised 57.6% of the cohort. From 1984 to 2018, there was a statistically significant improvement in both PFS and OS (Figure 1 a and b; p Conclusion: Our study demonstrates significant improvement over the past several decades in survival in AML and MDS patients undergoing allo-SCT. Major factors that likely contribute to improvement in outcomes throughout the years include adjustments in conditioning regimens and GVHD prophylaxis, earlier recognition of complications as well as improved management, and improved general supportive care. Overall, while outcomes have improved significantly throughout the years, post-transplant relapses remains the leading cause of transplant failure in this group. Preventing relapse post-transplant represents a continued target for research today. Disclosures Chaudhry: Sanofi: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Bumma:Amgen: Speakers Bureau; Sanofi: Speakers Bureau. Khan:Amgen: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy. Devarakonda:Janssen: Consultancy. Vasu:Omeros: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kiadis Inc: Other: Kiadis has obtained exclusive licensing requirements from The OHio State University. Jaglowski:CRISPR: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Juno: Consultancy; Kite, a Gilead Company: Consultancy, Research Funding. William:Kyowa Kirin: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Guidepoint Global: Consultancy; Incyte: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Dova: Research Funding. Mims:Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Agios: Consultancy; Leukemia and Lymphoma Society: Other: Senior Medical Director for Beat AML Study; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kura Oncology: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Syndax Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Other: Data Safety Monitoring Board. Brammer:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Speakers Bureau; Celgene Corporation: Research Funding. Efebera:Celgene: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Ohio State University: Current Employment.

Background: Patient (pts) with MCL who progress after BTKi therapy have a median overall survival of only 5.8 mo with salvage therapies (Martin, et al. Blood 2016). KTE-X19 is an autologous anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy being evaluated in the Phase 2, registrational, multicenter ZUMA-2 study of pts with R/R MCL after 1 - 5 prior therapies, including a BTKi. In the primary analysis of ZUMA-2 (N = 60), the objective response rate (ORR) with KTE-X19 treatment (median follow-up 12.3 mo) was 93% (67% complete response [CR] rate; Wang et al. N Engl J Med 2020). Here, we describe a comparative analysis of KTE-X19 pharmacology profile and outcomes by MCL morphology and prior BTKi exposure (ibrutinib [Ibr] and/or acalabrutinib [Acala]), accompanied by basic product attribute characterization. Methods: Eligible pts with R/R MCL underwent leukapheresis and conditioning chemotherapy followed by a single infusion of 2 × 106 anti-CD19 CAR T cells/kg (Wang et al. N Engl J Med 2020). Product attributes, CAR T cell levels in blood, and cytokine levels in serum were assessed using methods previously described (Locke et al. Mol Ther 2017). Clinical outcomes are reported in the 60 efficacy-evaluable pts; product attributes and pharmacology data are reported for all 68 treated pts (data cutoff 7/24/2019). Additional pharmacodynamic and cytogenetic data were generated and will be presented. Results: At baseline, 40 pts (59%) had classical MCL, 17 (25%) had blastoid MCL, and 4 (6%) had pleomorphic MCL as assessed by investigator. Before study entry, 52 pts (76%) had prior Ibr, 10 (15%) had prior Acala, and 6 (9%) had both; 88% had BTKi-refractory disease. In manufactured KTE-X19 products, median (range) CD4/CD8 ratios for pts with classical, blastoid, or pleomorphic MCL were 0.7 (0.04 - 2.8), 0.6 (0.2 - 1.1), or 0.7 (0.5 - 2.0), respectively. Product T cell phenotypes (median [range]) included less differentiated CCR7+ T cells (classical 40.0% [2.6 - 88.8]; blastoid 35.3% [14.3 - 73.4]; pleomorphic 80.8% [57.3 - 88.8]) and effector + effector memory CCR7- T cells (classical 59.9% [11.1 - 97.4]; blastoid 64.8% [26.6 - 85.7]; pleomorphic 19.2% [11.1 - 42.7]). Median (range) interferon (IFN)-γ levels by coculture in pts with classical, blastoid, or pleomorphic MCL were 6309.5 pg/mL (424.0 - 20,000), 6510.0 pg/mL (2709.0 - 18,000), or 7687.5 pg/mL (424.0 - 12,000), respectively. In pts with classical, blastoid, or pleomorphic MCL, median (range) peak CAR T cell levels were 77.6 cells/µL (0.2 - 2241.6), 35.0 cells/µL (0.2 - 2589.5), or 144.9 cells/µL (39.2 - 431.3), respectively. ORR/CR rates were 93%/65% in pts with classical MCL, 88%/53% in those with blastoid MCL, and 100%/75% in those with pleomorphic MCL. The 12-mo survival rates in pts with classical, blastoid, or pleomorphic MCL were 86.7%, 67.9%, or 100%, respectively. Grade ≥ 3 cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and neurologic events occurred in 15% and 38% of pts with classical MCL, 6% and 8% of pts with blastoid MCL, and 25% and 50% of pts with pleomorphic MCL. For pts who received prior Ibr, Acala, or both, median CD4/CD8 ratios in manufactured KTE-X19 products were 0.7 (range, 0.04 - 3.7), 0.6 (range, 0.3 - 1.2), or 1.0 (range, 0.7 - 1.9), respectively. Product T cell phenotypes (median [range]) included less differentiated CCR7+ T cells (Ibr 39.3% [2.6 - 86.4]; Acala 42.7% [16.3 - 88.8]; both 49.5% [14.3 - 83.0]) and CCR7- effector + effector memory T cells (Ibr 60.6 [13.7 - 97.4]; Acala 57.3% [11.1 - 83.8]; both 50.6% [17.0 - 85.7]). Median (range) levels of IFN-γ by coculture in pts with prior Ibr, Acala, or both was 6496.0 pg/mL (424.0 - 20,000), 5972.5 pg/mL (2502.0 - 18,000), or 7985.5 pg/mL (2709.0 - 12,000), respectively. For pts with prior Ibr, Acala, or both, median (range) peak CAR T cell levels were 95.9 (0.4 - 2589.5), 13.7 (0.2 - 182.4), or 115.9 (17.2 - 1753.6), respectively. ORR/CR rates were 94%/65% in pts with prior Ibr, 80%/40% in pts with prior Acala, and 100%/100% in pts with both BTKis. The 12-mo survival rates in pts with prior Ibr, Acala, or both were 81%, 80%, or 100%, respectively. Grade ≥ 3 CRS and neurologic events occurred in 17% and 31% of pts with prior Ibr, 10% and 10% of pts with Acala, and 0 and 67% of pts with both BTKis. Conclusions: All subgroups defined by MCL morphology or prior BTKi drew clinical benefit from KTE-X19 treatment, with lower post-treatment CAR T cell levels in pts with blastoid morphology or previously treated with Acala alone. Disclosures Wang: OMI: Honoraria, Other: Travel, accommodation, expenses; MoreHealth: Consultancy; Loxo Oncology: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Other: Travel, accommodation, expenses, Research Funding; VelosBio: Research Funding; Nobel Insights: Consultancy; Dava Oncology: Honoraria; Guidepoint Global: Consultancy; Pulse Biosciences: Consultancy; Lu Daopei Medical Group: Honoraria; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel, accommodation, expenses, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel, accommodation, expenses, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel, accommodation, expenses, Research Funding; Targeted Oncology: Honoraria; Oncternal: Consultancy, Research Funding; Molecular Templates: Research Funding; Verastem: Research Funding; InnoCare: Consultancy; OncLive: Honoraria; Acerta Pharma: Research Funding; Beijing Medical Award Foundation: Honoraria; Kite Pharma: Consultancy, Other: Travel, accommodation, expenses, Research Funding; Juno: Consultancy, Research Funding; BioInvent: Research Funding. Rossi:Gilead Sciences: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Kite, a Gilead Company: Current Employment. Munoz:Millenium: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Portola: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Genentech/Roche: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; AstraZeneca: Speakers Bureau; Verastem: Speakers Bureau; Acrotech/Aurobindo: Speakers Bureau; Innovent: Consultancy; Fosunkite: Consultancy; Beigene: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Alexion: Consultancy; Juno/Celgene/BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy; Kyowa: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bayer: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Kite, a Gilead Company: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Goy:AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: leadership role, Research Funding; Karyopharm: Research Funding; Acerta: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: leadership role, Research Funding; Constellation: Research Funding; Regional Cancer Care Associates/OMI: Current Employment; Infinity Verastem: Research Funding; Infinity: Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: leadership role, Research Funding; Kite, a Gilead Company: Consultancy, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Honoraria, Other: leadership role, Research Funding; Xcenda: Consultancy; Genentech/Roche: Research Funding; COTA: Consultancy, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Other: leadership role; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; PracticeUpdate Oncology: Consultancy; Bayer: Research Funding; RCCA/OMI: Current Employment; Hackensack UMC and University of Nebraska: Research Funding; AbbVie: Research Funding; MD Anderson: Research Funding; Morphosys: Research Funding; CALBG: Research Funding. Locke:Kite, a Gilead Company: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene/Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Calibr: Consultancy; Allogene: Consultancy; Cellular Biomedicine Group: Other: Consultancy with grant options; GammaDelta Therapeutics: Consultancy; Wugen: Consultancy. Reagan:Kite, a Gilead Company: Consultancy; Curis: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding. Jacobson:Celgene/BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel support; Precision Biosciences: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel support; Nkarta: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel support; AXIS: Speakers Bureau; Clinical Care Options: Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Research Funding; Lonza: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel support; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel support; Kite, a Gilead Company: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel support. Hill:Genentech: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; AstraZenica: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Kite, a Gilead Company: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Karyopharm: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Beigene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Holmes:Texas Oncology PA: Current Employment; Gilead/Kite, Celgene/Juno, Rigel, Karyopharm, Janssen, Dova: Consultancy; Gilead/Kite, Novartis, Autolus, Celgene/Juno/bluebird, Genentech, Inc., Rigel, Janssen, Unum, ADC Therapeutics, Seattle Genetics, Incyte, Verastem: Research Funding; Kite, Karyopharm, Seattle Genetics, Rigel, Dova: Speakers Bureau. Jaglowski:CRISPR: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Juno: Consultancy; Kite, a Gilead Company: Consultancy, Research Funding. Peng:Kite, a Gilead Company: Current Employment; Gilead Sciences: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Zheng:Gilead Sciences: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Kite, a Gilead Company: Current Employment. Fang:Kite, a Gilead Company: Current Employment; Gilead: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Xue:Kite, a Gilead Company: Current Employment; Kite, a Gilead Company: Current equity holder in private company. Kloos:Kite, a Gilead Company: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Bot:Kite, a Gilead Company: Current Employment; Gilead Sciences: Consultancy, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Other: Travel support .

Introduction-Chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) poses as a major late complication of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. The role of cGVHD as a determinant in transplant-related morbidity and mortality, infectious complications, prolonged immune suppression, and impaired patient-reported quality of life has been extensively studied. Nonetheless, numerous advances in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (allo-SCT) in recent years have expanded the indications for allo-SCT to a broader range of patients, including previously excluded older patients. However, long-term health status of older transplant recipients is poorly studied. Notably, the incidence of cGVHD may increase with age. Therefore, the development of cGVHD and the use of immunosuppressive therapy may lead to a higher degree of non-relapse mortality (NRM) in older patients. The objective of this study was to compare the NRM in both younger and older transplant recipients with and without cGVHD. Methods-We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients that underwent allo-SCT at the Ohio State University from 1999 to 2018. Data was analyzed from 1194 patients who survived or have been followed up with by at least day (d) 180 post-transplantation, among which 373 patients had developed cGVHD. Patients were grouped based on their age into a younger and older population. The older population was defined as ≥60 (N=373, 31%) with the younger population defined as Results-The median age at allo-SCT was 53.0 yr (range: 18-76) and 61.1% were male. Acute myeloid leukemia accounted for 36.7% of transplants, followed by non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (14.8%), acute lymphoid leukemia (12.7%), and myelodysplastic syndrome (11.0%). Additionally, 58.0% received reduced-intensity conditioning regimen. The majority of stem cell donor types were match unrelated (45.3%) and match related (39.8%). Patients who had developed cGVHD by d180, regardless of age, were at higher risk of NRM compared to patients with no cGVHD (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.52, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.16-1.99; p=0.002). To examine the influence of age with NRM, we stratified the analysis by cGVHD status by d180. Among patients developed cGVHD by d180, in both univariable (HR 1.22, 95% CI 0.79-1.9, p=0.373) and multivariable analysis (HR: 1.17, 95% CI: 0.74-1.87; p=0.501), there was no statistically significant difference in NRM between patients ≥60 and Conclusion-This study showed that patients with cGVHD by day 180 were at higher risk for higher NRM compared to patients without cGVHD. Among cGVHD patients, there was no difference on the outcome of older patients (≥60 years old) compared to younger ones ( Disclosures Chaudhry: Sanofi: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Bumma:Sanofi: Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Speakers Bureau. Khan:Amgen: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy. Devarakonda:Janssen: Consultancy. Vasu:Kiadis Inc: Other: Kiadis has obtained exclusive licensing requirements from The OHio State University; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Omeros: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Jaglowski:Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Juno: Consultancy; Kite, a Gilead Company: Consultancy, Research Funding; CRISPR: Consultancy. William:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Dova: Research Funding; Guidepoint Global: Consultancy; Merck: Research Funding; Kyowa Kirin: Consultancy, Honoraria; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding. Mims:Syndax Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Other: Data Safety Monitoring Board; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kura Oncology: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Leukemia and Lymphoma Society: Other: Senior Medical Director for Beat AML Study; Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Agios: Consultancy. Brammer:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Kymera: Honoraria; Verastem Oncology: Other: Travel. Saad:Magenta Therapeutics: Other: Personal Fees; Incyte Pharmaceuticals: Other: Personal Fees; Amgen: Other: research support; Kadmon: Other: research support; Orcabio: Other: research support. Efebera:Takeda: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Ohio State University: Current Employment.

Introduction: Classical Hodgkin's Lymphoma (cHL) is characterized by an extensive inflammatory infiltrate with abundant Th2 and Treg cells which facilitate immune escape of Reed Sternberg (RS) cells and provides a growth promoting microenvironment by cytokine secretion and CD40/CD40L engagement. Our group previously show that ibrutinib irreversibly inhibits both Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) and interleukin-2 inducible kinase (ITK), a kinase important in Th2 signaling (Dubovsky et al Blood 2013). We hypothesized that the addition of ibrutinib to nivolumab would lead to deeper and more durable responses in cHL by normalizing the Th1/Th2 balance thus reversing immune escape of RS cells. We present results of a planned interim analysis of the first 10 patients enrolled with a data cutoff of June of 2020. Methods: This is a single arm, phase II, single institutional clinical trial testing the clinical activity of nivolumab in combination with ibrutinib in patients ≥18 years of age with histologically confirmed cHL who have received at least one prior line of therapy and who were either not candidates for or had a prior autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT). Prior treatment with nivolumab was allowed. Ibrutinib was administered at 560 mg daily until progression in combination with nivolumab 3 mg/kg IV every 3 weeks for 16 cycles. The primary objective was complete response rate (CRR) prior to cycle 7 assessed per Lugano criteria. Adverse events (AEs) were reported using CTCAE Version 4.0. Results: Of the first 11 cHL patients enrolled, one patient withdrew consent prior to initiating therapy. Of the remaining 10 patients, the median age was 41 years (range 20-84) and 4 patients (40%) were male. The median number of prior lines of treatment was 4.5 (range 1-11), 5 patients (50%) had prior ASCT, 8 patients (80%) had prior brentuximab, and 5 patients (50%) had prior nivolumab. Four of the five patients with prior nivolumab had progressed while receiving therapy while the remaining patient had stable disease upon completing nivolumab with a median time from the last nivolumab treatment of 15.6 months (range 0.7-23.2). Of the 10 patients who received treatment, one patient came off study after two cycles due to persistent grade 2 transaminitis lasting for several weeks attributed to nivolumab requiring high dose oral steroids. One patient came off study after cycle 9 due to grade 3 hematuria attributed to ibrutinib and another came off study due to a pericardial effusion after 8 cycles of ibrutinib maintenance. In the remaining patients, treatment was generally well tolerated with most AEs being grade 1-2 (Table 1). The median number of total cycles received was 9 (range 2-22). Of the 9 patients evaluable for response, 6 patients responded (ORR = 66%), 4 of whom had a complete response (CRR = 44%) with a median time to response of 2 months (Table 2, Fig.1). In intention-to-treat analysis, the ORR was 60% and CRR was 40% meeting our prespecified interim efficacy endpoint of a 30% CRR for trial continuation. Notably, of the 5 patients with prior nivolumab, 3 responded to nivolumab + ibrutinib (ORR = 60%), with one having a CR (CRR = 20%). Overall, at a median follow up of 9.5 months, both the median PFS and duration of response have not yet been reached, with 3 patients remaining in CR at the time of data cutoff. Three of 4 patients discontinued trial treatment to undergo SCT [2 allogeneic; 1 autologous]. Of the 2 allogeneic SCT patients, the first one underwent SCT 3 weeks after the last nivolumab infusion and developed multi-organ acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) followed by severe chronic GVHD requiring extracorporeal photopheresis. The second patient underwent allogeneic SCT 2 months following the last nivolumab infusion and had no acute GVHD and experienced only mild chronic GVHD which was medically managed. Conclusions: Although the numbers are small and further recruitment is ongoing (target n=17), the combination of ibrutinib and nivolumab was generally well tolerated and with high response rate with more than half of responding patients achieving a CR. In addition, responses were seen in patients with prior nivolumab treatment. Our results suggest a possible novel role for BTK inhibition in reversing nivolumab resistance in cHL, at least in some cases. Correlative studies including peripheral blood and tumor immune subset analyses are ongoing and the latest results will be presented at the meeting. Disclosures Christian: Acerta: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Millenium: Research Funding; MorphoSys: Research Funding; F Hoffman-La Roche: Research Funding; Triphase: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Verastem: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AstraZenica: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Maddocks:Morphosys: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria; Karyopharm: Consultancy; ADC Therapeutics, AstraZeneca: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Honoraria. Epperla:Verastem Oncology: Speakers Bureau; Pharmacyclics: Honoraria. William:Incyte: Research Funding; Dova: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Kyowa Kirin: Consultancy, Honoraria; Guidepoint Global: Consultancy. Jaglowski:Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; CRISPR: Consultancy; Kite, a Gilead Company: Consultancy, Research Funding; Juno: Consultancy. Bond:Seattle Genetics: Honoraria. Brammer:Celgene Corporation: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Speakers Bureau. Baiocchi:viracta: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Prelude Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding. OffLabel Disclosure: This trial uses ibrutnib in cHL to augment the responses of concurrent nivolumab administration.

Background Clostridioides difficile (CD) infection is a major cause of infectious diarrhea among Bone Marrow Transplant (BMT) patients. Previous research showed asymptomatic colonized patients with CD may confer a risk for nosocomial transmission. We found that 14% of patients admitted to our BMT unit were colonized with toxigenic CD. The objective of this study is to determine patient room contamination by asymptomatic patients colonized with CD. Methods The BMT unit implemented CD colonization screening upon admission using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) CD testing on formed stools. Screening was performed on patients undergoing BMT, experiencing complications, or patients with a hematology diagnosis. PCR CD testing was performed on the first formed stool. Three surfaces: toilet, bathroom sink, and in-room computer keyboard were sampled by swabbing the surface with a sponge moistened with buffer. The sponge was mechanically stomached to release recovered microorganisms. Samples were dilution plated onto agar plates and incubated anaerobically at 37°C for two days. Sample cutoffs are reported as Results Six hundred ninety eight patients had specimens submitted for screening. One hundred one (14%) patients screened positive for CD toxin. Of the 101 patients who screened positive, thirty eight rooms were cultured. Seventeen of the rooms were negative at all sites for CD spores, while 6 rooms were positive at all sites. The remaining fifteen rooms had a least one site positive. Seventeen toilet seats were positive for CD spores, followed by 14 keyboards and 8 bathroom sinks. Conclusions Room contamination from asymptomatic BMT patients colonized with CD does occur. Further analysis of the data may delineate the environmental risk from asymptomatic colonized patients. These findings may have implications for infection control measures needed to mitigate the risk of healthcare-associated CD infection.

3023 Background: ZUMA-2 is a Phase 2 study evaluating KTE-X19, an autologous anti-CD19 CAR T cell therapy, in pts with R/R MCL (1 – 5 prior therapies, including a BTK inhibitor). In the primary efficacy analysis of ZUMA-2 (N = 60), the objective response rate was 93% (67% complete responses) and was generally comparable among high risk pts (Wang et al. ASH 2019 #754). CAR T cell levels in blood were associated with objective response (including minimal residual disease [MRD] negativity) and toxicity. Here, we describe a comparative analysis of KTE-X19 pharmacology profile in higher vs lower risk pts in ZUMA-2. Methods: Product attributes, CAR T cell and serum cytokine levels in blood, and their associations with clinical outcomes, were analyzed using previously described methods (Locke et al. Mol Ther 2017). MRD (10−5 sensitivity) was assessed by next-generation sequencing. Pharmacology data are reported for all 68 pts treated with KTE-X19 (2 × 106 cells/kg). Results: Manufactured KTE-X19 products showed a slight bias to CD8 and effector memory/effector phenotype. Median CD4/CD8 ratio was 0.7 (range, 0.04 – 3.7); T cell phenotypes included naive (median, 24.5%; range, 0.3 – 80.7), central memory (median, 12.8%; range, 2.3 – 51.6), effector memory (median, 24.5% (range, 0.8 – 70.3) and effector (median, 28.7%; range, 2.8 – 65.2). MRD negative (n = 24/29) vs positive pts (n = 5/29) at 1 mo post KTE-X19 had increased median cytokine levels, including IL-15, IL-2, IFN-γ, IL-10, and IL-6, peaking in serum within 7 days post treatment. Pts who were MRD negative by 1 mo post treatment also had increased median peak levels of Granzyme B and soluble PD-L1. Six pts developed Grade 4 neurologic events (NE), including 1 cerebral edema case; 3 had concurrent Grade 4 cytokine release syndrome. These pts had higher peak cytokine levels vs pts without Grade 4 NE, with lack of reversion to baseline by Day 28 of serum IL-6 and sVCAM-1. Peak CAR T cell in blood and serum cytokine levels were generally comparable in higher vs lower risk pts defined as TP53 mutated (n = 6/36) vs unmutated (n = 30/36), or high vs low Ki-67 proliferation index (PI; ≥ 30% [n = 40/49] and < 30% [n = 9/49]), consistent with the comparable clinical efficacy of KTE-X19 in these subgroups. Conclusions: PD profile of KTE-X19 associated with efficacy (MRD status at 1 mo) and treatment-related NE. In contrast to approved therapies, KTE-X19 showed comparable pharmacology and clinical outcomes in pts with higher vs lower risk MCL defined by TP53 mutation or Ki-67 PI. Clinical trial information: NCT02601313 .

Introduction CART-cell therapy is associated with dramatic efficacy in patients with relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and B-acute lymphoblastic leukemia. However, the efficacy of CART therapy is limited by potentially fatal toxicities including cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and neurotoxicity. Increasingly, emerging reports have suggested the potential for significant hemodynamic collapse following CART therapy. Yet, whether the occurrence of these hemodynamic shifts or any other cardiovascular disease (CVD) events have bearing on clinical outcomes after CART initiation is unknown. Methods We evaluated all patients treated with CART therapy for lymphoid malignancies at The Ohio State University James Comprehensive Cancer Center between 2016-2019 and assessed the incidence of CVD events and severe hemodynamic collapse [systolic blood pressure (SBP) cutoff of less than 80 mmHg]. We also evaluated the relationship of CVD events, hemodynamic collapse, and the presence of preceding CVD on overall survival (OS) and progression-free-survival (PFS) following infusion of CART cells utilizing univariate log-rank comparison. Results We evaluated 66 patients with 62% male and 38% female with an average age of 60 years (range 23-80). 49 (74%) patients received Yescarta and 17 (26%) patients received Kymriah. With a median follow-up time of 21 months, OS and PFS at 1 year were 72% and 43%, respectively, in concordance with previously reported ZUMA1 and JULIET survival rates. Overall, from 66 CART-treated patients, 14 (21.2%) developed incident CVD events, including 11 patients with arrhythmias and 2 with CHF. The median decrease in peak systolic blood pressure after infusion was 32 mmHg (IQR 22-47 mmHg), noted at a median of 4 days post-CART. Furthermore, after infusion, 17 (25.8%) saw falls in systolic pressure to Conclusion The development of significant early hypotension is associated with a marked decrease in survival among patients receiving CART therapy. Further understanding of this finding, and its relation to CRS is urgently needed in order to maximize the effectiveness of this novel anticancer therapy.

Background Axicabtagene ciloleucel (A) and Tisagenlecleucel (T) are FDA approved CAR T cell products that have changed treatment (tx) for patients (pts) w/ relapsed/refractory lymphoma. The high tx cost has implications in selection of pts for CAR T and data comparing these txs at a single institution is lacking. Here we report data for pts treated w/ A and T at OSUCCC. Methods 63 pts were included. 45 received A (1 under Expanded Access Protocol (EAP) for out of specification product) from 1/18-6/19 and 18 received T (8 pts under EAP) from 7/18-5/19. Fisher's exact test and Wilcoxon rank sum test were used to compare A and T pts, and Kaplan-Meier was used to estimate overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Results Pt differences, adverse events and tx characteristics are reported in Table 1. There were no differences in creatinine, ECOG, CRP nor most disease (dx) characteristics including dx type, primary refractory dx, marrow dx, history of auto, response prior to tx, and prior lines of tx. Dx stage was different (p=.03) with more A pts having stage III dx than T pts (47% vs. 17%) but less A pts having stage IV dx (44% vs. 61%). A pts had a lower number of double expressors (27% vs. 78%, p Conclusion Clinical outcomes (PFS & OS) were comparable between A and T. We observed a higher incidence of CRS and NT with A, similar to what was observed in clinical trials. Higher hospitalization cost and LOS was associated with A. Our conclusions are limited by small sample size and the retrospective nature of the study.

Chimeric antigen receptor T cell (CAR T) therapy has become a breakthrough treatment option for patients with relapsed and refractory malignancies. Complications, such as neurotoxicity often associated with cytokine release syndrome (CRS), are self-limiting but can be life threatening or fatal. Recently, grade 3-4 neurotoxicity has shown to lower overall survival, with prolonged courses of corticosteroids having no improvement in outcomes. With the lack of efficacy and increased toxicity of high dose corticosteroids, different strategies are needed. At The James Cancer Hospital at The Ohio State University, patients with severe neurotoxicity who have not responded to corticosteroids or have rebound neurotoxicity while on corticosteroids, have been treated with intrathecal (IT) triple chemotherapy (e.g. methotrexate 15mg, cytarabine 40mg, hydrocortisone 50mg). Here, we describe 7 patients who received CD 19-directed CAR T therapy with axicabtagene ciloleucel for non-Hodgkin lymphoma and developed grade 3-4 neurotoxicity. Three patients (43%) had prior CNS disease and 6 patients (86%) had progressive disease at time of CAR T therapy. One patient received CAR T therapy on clinical trial. All patients developed CRS with a max grade of 2 and a median onset of 1 day (range, 0-6). Five patients (71%) received tocilizumab and 2 patients (29%) received siltuximab for persistent CRS. Grade 3-4 neurotoxicity developed in a median of 7 days (range, 5-11). Ferritin levels peaked after high dose corticosteroids and/or tocilizumab was given. Four patients (57%) had no response to corticosteroids and the 3 patients (43%) who initially responded, developed rebound neurotoxicity after corticosteroids were tapered. All patients received 1 dose of IT chemotherapy and had grade 3-4 neurotoxicity at time of administration. Median time to IT chemotherapy from onset of neurotoxicity was 11 days (range, 3-21). Overall, 5 patients (71%) responded to IT chemotherapy with total resolution of neurotoxicity in a median of 11 days (range, 1-18). Administration of IT chemotherapy allowed corticosteroids to be discontinued in a median of 11 days (range, 1-20) in responders. Four patients that were intubated due to severe neurotoxicity were extubated in a median of 3 days (range, 2-5) after IT chemotherapy. The 2 patients that did not respond died from infection. Five patients are still alive with 3 patients in complete response, 1 patient in partial response and 1 patient with progressive disease. Ferritin levels did not correlate with resolution of neurotoxicity. The outcomes of this cohort present a promising alternative to prolonged courses of corticosteroids, which can cause significant toxicities and increase the risk for opportunistic infections. Treatment of severe neurotoxicity with IT chemotherapy that is unresponsive to corticosteroids warrants further evaluation in prospective clinical trials.

Introduction Outcomes with salvage regimens in pts with MCL who progress after Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor (BTKi) therapy are poor. ZUMA-2 is a Phase 2, registrational, multicenter study evaluating KTE-X19, an autologous anti-CD19 CAR T cell therapy, in pts with R/R MCL (1-5 therapies, including a BTKi). We present interim efficacy and safety results. Objectives Evaluate efficacy and safety of KTE-X19 in R/R MCL. Methods Eligible pts (≥ 18 y) with R/R MCL had an ECOG of 0-1 and ≤ 5 prior therapies, including chemotherapy, an anti-CD20 antibody, and a BTKi. Pts underwent leukapheresis and conditioning chemotherapy followed by KTE-X19 infusion at 2 × 106 cells/kg. Bridging therapy with dexamethasone, ibrutinib, or acalabrutinib was permitted. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR; complete response [CR] + partial response) assessed by an Independent Review Committee per the Lugano Classification (Cheson, et al. J Clin Oncol. 2014). Interim efficacy endpoints were investigator-assessed using the revised IWG Response Criteria for Malignant Lymphoma (Cheson, et al. J Clin Oncol. 2007). Key secondary endpoints were duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), frequency of adverse events (AEs), and blood levels of CAR T cells and cytokines. Sixty pts received KTE-X19; here, we present results in pts with ≥ 1 y follow-up. Updated results in all 60 pts will be reported in the presentation. Results As of May 30, 2018, 28 pts received KTE-X19 with ≥ 1 y follow-up (median, 13.2 mo). The median age was 65 y; 43% of pts had an ECOG score of 1; 21% had blastoid morphology; 82% had stage IV disease; 50% had intermediate/high-risk MIPI; and 86% received a median of 4 prior therapies. In 20 of 28 pts with available data, the median Ki-67 index was 38%. Eight pts received bridging therapy; all had disease present post-bridging. Investigator-assessed ORR was 86% (95% CI, 67-96) with a CR rate of 57% (95% CI, 37-76). As of May 30, 2018, 75% of responders remained in response, and 64% of treated pts had ongoing responses. The 12-month rates of DOR, PFS, and OS were 83% (95% CI, 60-93), 71% (95% CI, 50-84), and 86% (95% CI, 66-94), respectively; medians were not reached. The most common Grade ≥ 3 AEs were anemia (54%), platelet count decreased (39%), and neutropenia (36%). Grade 3/4 cytokine release syndrome (CRS) assessed by Lee et al. (Blood. 2014) and Grade 3/4 neurologic events (NE) occurred in 18% and 46% of pts, respectively, with no Grade 5 events. CRS and NE were generally reversible. There was 1 Grade 5 AE of organizing pneumonia. Median CAR T cell levels measured by peak and area under the curve were 99 cells/µL (range, 0.4-2589) and 1542 cells/µL (range, 5.5-27239), respectively. Conclusion With ≥ 1 y follow-up, KTE-X19 demonstrated significant and durable clinical benefit, with a manageable safety profile in pts with R/R MCL for whom there are no curative treatment options.

Introduction Acute graft versus host disease (aGVHD) remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (allo-HSCT). Preventing GVHD without impairing the graft-versus-tumor effect remains an important goal for successful allo-HSCT. Tacrolimus (TAC), a calcineurin inhibitor that prevents T-cell activation, is commonly used as aGVHD prophylaxis. The influence of TAC has proved effective for preventing aGVHD after allo-HSCT. There is also variability in the serum concentrations of TAC and very little is known on the impact of early (first 4 weeks) TAC levels on aGVHD incidence. Methods Data were analyzed for 707 consecutive patients undergoing allo-HSCT at the Ohio State University between 2002- 2016. All patients received standard prophylaxis with TAC daily and methotrexate on days +1, +3, +6, and +11 post allo-HSCT. Tacrolimus dose was adjusted to achieve a target serum level of 5-12 ng/ml. Fine and Gray's proportional hazard models accounting for competing risks were used to evaluate the association between TAC levels and outcome of aGVHD, cGVHD, GVHD-free/relapse-free survival (GRFS),and relapse. Cox proportional hazard models were used for the association with OS. Results The mean weekly TAC concentrations at weeks 1, 2, 3 and 4 were 8.0, 9.7, 11.3 and 10.5 ng/mL, respectively. The cumulative incidence of grades II–IV aGVHD was 40% at day 100 and 45% at day 180 post HSCT. In univariable analysis, high TAC level at week 1 was associated with lower grade II-IV aGVHD (Hazard ratio (HR), 0.96; p = 0.006). We examined the effect of week 1 TAC levels categorized into tertiles ( 8.95 ng/ml). Higher level of TAC (>8.95 ng/ml) was associated with lower risk of aGVHD (Figure 1a). In multivariable analysis, week 1 TAC levels > 5.85 ng/ml remained associated with a lower risk of grade II-IV aGVHD. However, only levels of 5.85-8.95 ng/ml were associated with statistically significant lower risk with HR=0.75, p=0.04 compared to the lower group ( 7.2 ng/ml (HR: 0.78, p=0.03). The CI of cGVHD was 41% at 1 year post-allo-HSCT. Week 2 TAC level >10.6 ng/ml was associated with an increased risk of relapse (HR, 1.37, p=0.043) (Figure 1b). The cumulative incidence of relapse at 1, 3 and 5 year post allo-HSCT was 33%, 38% and 40%, respectively. TAC levels at weeks 1, 2, 3 and 4 were not associated with OS. The 1, 3 and 5 year GRFS was 21%, 14% and 12%.TAC levels at any week were not associated with GRFS. Conclusion Achieving mean whole-blood level of tacrolimus between 6.0-9.0 ng/ml within the first week post-allogenic bone marrow transplantation may reduce the risk of aGVHD.

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) is potentially curative for a number of hematologic conditions, both malignant and nonmalignant. However, its success can be limited by the development of acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). Chronic GVHD (cGVHD) is the most common long-term complication following allo-SCT, and patients who develop this condition have significantly higher morbidity and mortality and significantly lower quality of life than patients who do not. Until recently, there were no US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)–approved therapies for cGVHD treatment. In this review article, we describe how ibrutinib was identified as potential cGVHD therapy based on preclinical cGVHD models and clinical studies in B-cell malignancies and elucidation of its mechanisms of action in cGVHD. Results from a phase 2 clinical trial that was designed based on National Institutes of Health Criteria for the grading and staging of cGVHD culminated in the FDA-approval of ibrutinib as second line therapy of steroid-refractory or steroid-resistant cGVHD. Results of ibrutinib studies in phase 3 randomized studies, for cGVHD prophylaxis and as first -line testing along with steroids will be especially important in selecting the preferred indications for ibrutinib in patients at risk for or who have developed cGVHD.

Importance Ibrutinib, a first-in-class Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor taken once daily, is approved in the United States for patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma and allows for treatment without chemotherapy. Extended treatment with ibrutinib has demonstrated increased complete response (CR) rates over time. Objective To analyze baseline factors that predict CR in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma treated with ibrutinib. Design, Setting, and Participants Univariate and multivariate analyses of pooled data from 2 clinical trials were used to assess the prognostic value of baseline factors associated with CR in 327 patients from the PCYC-1102 and PCYC-1112 studies treated with single-agent ibrutinib. Participants were followed up in academic and community medical centers in the United States, the United Kingdom, Australia, France, Italy, Ireland, Poland, Spain, and Austria. Main Outcomes and Measures Odds ratio (OR) of CR rate. Results The 327 patients included in this analysis had a median age of 67 years (range, 30-86 years) and 227 (69.4%) were male. At baseline, 185 patients (56.6%) had bulky disease (lymph node ≥5 cm), 184 (56.3%) had advanced-stage disease, and 182 (55.7%) had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 1 or higher. Thirty-one patients (9.5%) were in the first-line setting; 38 (11.6%) had undergone 1 previous therapy, 81 (24.8%) had undergone 2, and 177 (54.1%) had undergone 3 or more; patients with relapsed/refractory disease had undergone a median of 3 (range, 0-12) previous therapies. Median time on study was 26.4 months (range, 0.3-55.6 months). Thirty-two of the 327 patients (9.8%) treated with ibrutinib had a CR (PCYC-1102: relapsed/refractory, 12 of 101 [11.9%]; treatment-naive, 8 of 31 [25.8%]; and PCYC-1112: 12 of 195 [6.2%]). The median time to CR for these patients was 14.7 months (range, 4.6-47.1 months). Univariate analysis of baseline factors showed that bulky disease, clinical stage, number of previous therapies, and β2-microglobulin concentration had a significant effect on the odds of CR. The final multivariate model showed that patients with no previous therapy vs patients with at least 1 previous therapy (OR, 2.65; 95% CI, 1.01-6.95;P = .047) and patients without bulky disease (lymph node Conclusions and Relevance Patients receiving ibrutinib as a first-line therapy for chronic lymphocytic leukemia and those without bulky disease had a better likelihood of CR to treatment. The CR rate with continued longer-term ibrutinib treatment was higher than in previous reports. Trial Registration clinicaltrials.gov Identifiers:NCT01105247andNCT01578707

Background Tisagenlecleucel, a chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy, has demonstrated efficacy and manageable safety in adult patients (pts) with relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (r/r DLBCL) in the global, multicenter, pivotal, phase 2, JULIET trial (NCT02445248). The primary endpoint, overall response rate (ORR), was met at the interim analysis (ORR: 59% [CR, 43%; PR, 16%]). Here, we report an updated analysis with a median 19 mo follow-up. Methods Adult pts ≥18 y with r/r DLBCL that had progressed after ≥2 lines of therapy including rituximab and an anthracycline and who were ineligible for or failed autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) were enrolled. Tisagenlecleucel was manufactured from autologous T cells at 2 facilities (Morris Plains, NJ, USA [main cohort]. and Leipzig, Germany [cohort A]) and provided to pts at 27 treatment centers in 10 countries across the globe. Efficacy analyses include all pts with ≥3 mo of follow-up or earlier discontinuation. Safety analyses include all infused pts. Results In the JULIET study, 115 pts (99 in main cohort; 16 in cohort A) received a single dose of tisagenlecleucel infusion as of 21 May 2018. Prior to infusion, 90% of infused pts received bridging chemotherapy and 93% received lymphodepletion chemotherapy. Pts were a median 56 y (range, 22-76 y); 77% of pts had stage III/IV and 17% had double/triple-hit disease at the time of entry. Approximately half (51%) of pts had received ≥3 prior lines of chemotherapy (range, 1-6); 49% received prior ASCT. ORR was 54% (40% CR, 13% PR; 95% CI, 43%-64%) with a median follow-up of 19.3 mo post-infusion. Median duration of response (DOR) was not reached. The relapse-free probability was 66% (95% CI, 51%-78%) at 6 mo and 64% (95% CI, 48%-76%) at 12 or 18 mo. Consistent ORR was reported across prognostic subgroups (eg, prior ASCT; double/triple-hit lymphoma) and DOR was similar among age groups and disease status (Figure). Median OS was not reached for pts in CR and was 11.1 mo (95% CI, 6.6 mo-NE) for all infused pts. The probability of OS was 48% (95% CI, 38%-57%) at 12 mo and 43% (95% CI, 33%-53%) at 18 mo (max follow-up, 29 mo). No pts proceeded to allogeneic SCT or ASCT while in remission. During the first 8 wks post-infusion, grade 3/4 adverse events of special interest were cytopenias lasting >28 days (34%), cytokine release syndrome (CRS; 23%, by the Penn scale), infections (19%), febrile neutropenia (15%), neurologic events (11%; 1 case of grade 2 cerebral edema), and tumor lysis syndrome (2%). Tocilizumab was administered to 16% of pts with CRS, and no treatment-related death was reported. Conclusions This updated analysis with longer follow-up confirms earlier findings. Tisagenlecleucel produced a durable high ORR, consistent efficacy across all predefined subgroups, and had a manageable safety profile in pts with r/r DLBCL.

Background Quality of life (QoL) is an important endpoint in the JULIET study (NCT02445248), a phase 2 trial evaluating a single infusion of tisagenlecleucel in adult patients (pts) with relapsed/refractory (r/r) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Earlier analyses showed improvements in QoL at month (mo) 3 and 6 (Maziarz et al, ASH 2017, EBMT 2018). We report updated JULIET data with extended follow-up (FU; median: 19.3 mo). Methods Pts were aged ≥18 years with r/r DLBCL after ≥2 lines of therapy and either failed or were ineligible for autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant (SCT). At baseline, mo-3 through mo-24, pts completed the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lymphoma (FACT-Lym) and Short Form-36 Health Survey v2 (SF-36). Higher scores indicate better QoL. Results Of the 167 enrolled pts, 115 pts were infused with tisagenlecleucel before data cutoff; 96% had previously received ≥2 systemic therapies and 49% had relapsed after SCT. QoL instruments were completed by 108 pts (94%) at baseline, including 50 patients who had complete response (CR) or partial response (PR). Of pts eligible for analysis with CR or PR, 26 and 21 completed the assessments at mo-12 and -18, respectively. Scores of pts with CR or PR (mean change at baseline through mo-18) indicated sustained improvements in all categories (Table 1). Similar trends were observed for SF-36. Conclusions With long term FU, pts with r/r DLBCL responding to tisagenlecleucel continue to show sustained improvements in QoL.

Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is frequently complicated by secondary autoimmune cytopenias (AICs). Ibrutinib is an irreversible inhibitor of Bruton's tyrosine kinase approved for the treatment of relapsed CLL and CLL with del(17p). The effect of ibrutinib treatment on the incidence of AIC is currently unknown. We reviewed medical records of 301 patients treated with ibrutinib, as participants in therapeutic clinical trials at The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center between July 2010 and July 2014. Subjects were reviewed with respect to past history of AIC, and treatment-emergent AIC cases were identified. Before starting ibrutinib treatment, 26% of patients had experienced AIC. Information was available for a total of 468 patient-years of ibrutinib exposure, during which there were six cases of treatment-emergent AIC. This corresponds to an estimated incidence rate of 13 episodes for every 1000 patient-years of ibrutinib treatment. We further identified 22 patients receiving therapy for AIC at the time ibrutinib was started. Of these 22 patients, 19 were able to discontinue AIC therapy. We found that ibrutinib treatment is associated with a low rate of treatment-emergent AIC. Patients with an existing AIC have been successfully treated with ibrutinib and subsequently discontinued AIC therapy.

Assessment with 18F-fluorodeoxy glucose (FDG)–positron emission tomography (PET) before hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) for lymphoma may be prognostic for outcomes. Patients with chemotherapy-sensitive non–Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) undergoing allogeneic HCT reported to the Center of International Blood and Marrow Transplantation Registry between 2007 and 2012 were included. Pre-HCT PET status (positive versus negative) was determined by the reporting transplantation centers. We analyzed 336 patients; median age was 55 years and 60% were males. Follicular lymphoma (n = 104) was more common than large cell (n = 85), mantle cell (n = 69), and mature natural killer or T cell lymphoma (n = 78); two thirds of the cohort received reduced-intensity conditioning; one half had unrelated donor grafts. Patients underwent PET scanning a median of 1 month (range, .07 to 2.83 months) before HCT; 159 were PET positive and 177 were PET negative. At 3 years, relapse/progression, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) in PET-positive versus PET-negative groups were 40% versus 26%; P = .007; 43% versus 47%; P = .47; and 58% versus 60%; P = .73, respectively. On multivariate analysis, a positive pretransplantation PET was associated with an increased risk of relapse/progression (risk ratio [RR], 1.86; P = .001) but was not associated with increased mortality (RR, 1.29, 95% confidence interval [CI], .96 to 1.7; P = .08), therapy failure (RR, 1.32; 95% CI, .95 to 1.84; P = .10), or nonrelapse mortality (RR, .75; 95% CI, .48 to 1.18; P = .22). PET status conferred no influence on graft-versus-host disease. A positive PET scan before HCT is associated with increased relapse risk but should not be interpreted as a barrier to a successful allograft. PET status does not appear to predict survival after allogeneic HCT for NHL.

Ibrutinib represents a therapeutic advance in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) but as monotherapy produces few complete remissions in previously treated patients. Anti-CD20 antibodies have improved response and progression-free survival (PFS) when combined with chemotherapy. We evaluated the safety and activity of adding ofatumumab to ibrutinib in 3 different administration sequences. Patients with CLL/small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL), prolymphocytic leukemia, or Richter's transformation who failed ≥2 prior therapies were enrolled. Patients received ibrutinib 420 mg daily and 12 doses of ofatumumab 300/2000 mg in 3 schedules: ibrutinib lead-in (group 1; n = 27), concurrent start (group 2; n = 20), or ofatumumab lead-in (group 3; n = 24). Seventy-one patients were treated; most had high-risk disease including del(17)(p13.1) (44%) or del(11)(q22.3) (31%). The most frequent adverse events (any grade) were diarrhea (70%), infusion-related reaction (45%), and peripheral sensory neuropathy (44%). Overall response rates in CLL/SLL patients (n = 66) were 100%, 79%, and 71% in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Estimated 12-month PFSs for all patients were 89%, 85%, and 75%, respectively. Four patients in group 3 progressed prior to receiving ibrutinib. This study demonstrates the tolerability and clinical activity of this combination with quicker time to best response than single-agent ibrutinib and with durable responses. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01217749.

Acute graft-versus-host-disease (aGVHD) is a frequent and often lethal complication of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant despite prophylaxis. Tocilizumab is a humanized anti-IL-6 receptor monoclonal antibody that has evidence of activity in patients with steroid refractory (SR) GVHD. We retrospectively report on nine patients with grade 3 or 4 SR aGVHD who received tocilizumab. Eight mg/kg of tocilizumab was administered intravenously every 3–4 weeks. aGVHD grading and responses were based on consensus criteria. Median age at transplant was 48 years. Five patients had alternate donor sources. Median time from aGVHD onset to tocilizumab administration was 44 days. Two patients had complete responses and two had partial responses. Median survival from start of tocilizumab was 26 days (range 13–1054). Our limited experience demonstrated an overall response rate of 44% (CR + PR); however, this response was not durable. Further studies are needed to determine the optimal time for tocilizumab initiation.

Ibrutinib has significantly improved the outcome of patients with relapsed chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Recent reports attribute ibrutinib resistance to acquired mutations in Bruton agammaglobulinemia tyrosine kinase (BTK), the target of ibrutinib, as well as the immediate downstream effector phospholipase C, γ2 (PLCG2). Although the C481S mutation found in BTK has been shown to disable ibrutinib's capacity to irreversibly bind this primary target, the detailed mechanisms of mutations in PLCG2 have yet to be established. Herein, we characterize the enhanced signaling competence, BTK independence, and surface immunoglobulin dependence of the PLCG2 mutation at R665W, which has been documented in ibrutinib-resistant CLL. Our data demonstrate that this missense alteration elicits BTK-independent activation after B-cell receptor engagement, implying the formation of a novel BTK-bypass pathway. Consistent with previous results, PLCG2(R665W) confers hypermorphic induction of downstream signaling events. Our studies reveal that proximal kinases SYK and LYN are critical for the activation of mutant PLCG2 and that therapeutics targeting SYK and LYN can combat molecular resistance in cell line models and primary CLL cells from ibrutinib-resistant patients. Altogether, our results engender a molecular understanding of the identified aberration at PLCG2 and explore its functional dependency on BTK, SYK, and LYN, suggesting alternative strategies to combat acquired ibrutinib resistance.

Dinaciclib (SCH727965) is a selective CDKi chosen for clinical development based upon a favorable therapeutic index in cancer xenograft models. We performed a phase I dose escalation study of dinaciclib in relapsed and refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) patients with intact organ function and WBC200 × 10(9) /l. Five separate dose levels (5 mg/m(2), 7 mg/m(2), 10 mg/m(2), 14 mg/m(2) and 17 mg/m(2)) were explored dosing on a weekly schedule × 3 with 1 week off (4-week cycles) using a standard 3+3 design with expansion cohorts to optimize safety. Fifty-two patients were enrolled with relapsed and refractory CLL. Escalation through cohorts occurred with two dose-limiting toxicity (DLTs) at the 17 mg/m(2) dose (tumor lysis syndrome (TLS) and pneumonia). The phase II expansion occurred at 14 mg/m(2) with 16 patients receiving this dose with one DLT (TLS). Additional stepped up dosing to the maximum tolerated dose was examined in 19 patients at this dose. Adverse events included cytopenias, transient laboratory abnormalities and TLS. Responses occurred in 28 (54%) of patients independent of del(17)(p13.1) with a median progression-free survival of 481 days. Dinaciclib is clinically active in relapsed CLL including those patients with high risk del(17)(p13.1) disease and warrants future study.

Graft-versus-host disease-associated angiomatosis (GVHD-AA) is an uncommon manifestation of chronic GVHD consisting of friable vascular proliferations. Using fluorescence in situ hybridization, we demonstrate the presence of donor-derived endothelial cells within areas of GVHD-AA. This is the first documented occurrence of a benign neoplastic growth in relationship to a form of chronic GVHD.

Multiple myeloma (MM) is a disease of aging adults and autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) is considered the standard of care. As the population ages a growing number of older adults will undergo ASCT and an objective approach to estimate physiologic reserve and transplant morbidity risk is warranted. Here, we evaluate assess p16INK4a (p16), a molecular aging biomarker, along with geriatric metrics to determine risk of transplant toxicity. Methods We prospectively evaluated 100 MM patients for frailty before and after ASCT using a Geriatric Assessment (GA) and collected T-cells for analysis of p16 using a custom nanostring codeset. Results Pre-transplant physical function was predicative of hospital length of stay (LOS). Each one-unit increase in physical function score, the average LOS decreased by 0.52 days (95% CI, −1.03–0.02); p = .04). Similarly, higher self-report of ADL/IADL (Human Activity Profile was associated with shorter LOS (0.65 less days (95% CI −1.15 to −0.15), p = .01). Patients with anxiety/depression (OR = 1.10 (95% CI 1.00–1.22), p = .056), lower handgrip strength (OR = 0.90 (95% CI 0.82–0.98), p = .02), falls (OR = 1.60 (95% CI 1.07–2.38), p = .02), or weight loss (OR = 5.65 (95% CI 1.17–25.24), p = .03) were more likely to be re-admitted. The estimated EFS at 1-year was 85% (95% CI, 75–91) with median follow-up of 15.7 months. Weight loss was a significant predictor of EFS (HR = 3.13 (95% CI 1.15–8.50), p = .03). Frailty assessment by self-reported fatigue minimally correlated with T-cell p16 expression (r = 0.28; p = .02). Age, Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS), or Hematopoietic cell transplantation-specific Co-Morbidity Index (HCT-CI) did not predict hospital LOS or readmissions. Conclusions Our data illustrate that a GA can identify individuals with MM who are at greater risk for morbidity following ASCT.