Search

Polygenic and environmental factors are underlying causes of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). We hypothesized that integration of the genetic loci controlling a metabolite's abundance, with known IBD genetic susceptibility loci, may help resolve metabolic drivers of IBD.We measured the levels of 1300 metabolites in the serum of 484 patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) and 464 patients with Crohn's disease (CD) and 365 controls. Differential metabolite abundance was determined for disease status, subtype, clinical and endoscopic disease activity, as well as IBD phenotype including disease behavior, location, and extent. To inform on the genetic basis underlying metabolic diversity, we integrated metabolite and genomic data. Genetic colocalization and Mendelian randomization analyses were performed using known IBD risk loci to explore whether any metabolite was causally associated with IBD.We found 173 genetically controlled metabolites (metabolite quantitative trait loci, 9 novel) within 63 non-overlapping loci (7 novel). Furthermore, several metabolites significantly associated with IBD disease status and activity as defined using clinical and endoscopic indexes. This constitutes a resource for biomarker discovery and IBD biology insights. Using this resource, we show that a novel metabolite quantitative trait locus for serum butyrate levels containing ACADS was not supported as causal for IBD; replicate the association of serum omega-6 containing lipids with the fatty acid desaturase 1/2 locus and identify these metabolites as causal for CD through Mendelian randomization; and validate a novel association of serum plasmalogen and TMEM229B, which was predicted as causal for CD.An exploratory analysis combining genetics and unbiased serum metabolome surveys can reveal novel biomarkers of disease activity and potential mediators of pathology in IBD.

Background And Aims Disease extent varies in ulcerative colitis (UC) from proctitis to left-sided colitis to pancolitis and is a major prognostic factor. When the extent of UC is limited there is often a sharp demarcation between macroscopically involved and uninvolved areas and what defines this or subsequent extension is unknown. We characterized the demarcation site molecularly and determined genes associated with subsequent disease extension. Methods We performed RNA sequence analysis of biopsy specimens from UC patients with endoscopically and histologically confirmed limited disease, of which a subset later extended. Biopsy specimens were obtained from the endoscopically inflamed upper (proximal) limit of disease, immediately adjacent to the uninvolved colon, as well as at more proximal, endoscopically uninflamed colonic segments. Results Differentially expressed genes were identified in the endoscopically inflamed biopsy specimens taken at each patient's most proximal diseased site relative to healthy controls. Expression of these genes in the more proximal biopsy specimens transitioned back to control levels abruptly or gradually, the latter pattern supporting the concept that disease exists beyond the endoscopic disease demarcation site. The gradually transitioning genes were associated with inflammation, angiogenesis, glucuronidation, and homeodomain pathways. A subset of these genes in inflamed biopsy specimens was found to predict disease extension better than clinical features and were responsive to biologic therapies. Network analysis revealed critical roles for interferon signaling in UC inflammation and poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase 14 (PARP14) was a predicted key driver gene of extension. Higher PARP14 protein levels were found in inflamed biopsy specimens of patients with limited UC that subsequently extended. Conclusion Molecular predictors of disease extension reveal novel strategies for disease prognostication and potential therapeutic targeting.

ObjectiveWe sought to evaluate COVID-19 clinical course in patients with IBD treated with different medication classes and combinations.DesignSurveillance Epidemiology of Coronavirus Under Research Exclusion for Inflammatory Bowel Disease (SECURE-IBD) is a large, international registry created to monitor outcomes of IBD patients with confirmed COVID-19. We used multivariable regression with a generalised estimating equation accounting for country as a random effect to analyse the association of different medication classes with severe COVID-19, defined as intensive care unit admission, ventilator use and/or death.Results1439 cases from 47 countries were included (mean age 44.1 years, 51.4% men) of whom 112 patients (7.8%) had severe COVID-19. Compared with tumour necrosis factor (TNF) antagonist monotherapy, thiopurine monotherapy (adjusted OR (aOR) 4.08, 95% CI 1.73 to 9.61) and combination therapy with TNF antagonist and thiopurine (aOR 4.01, 95% CI 1.65 to 9.78) were associated with an increased risk of severe COVID-19. Any mesalamine/sulfasalazine compared with no mesalamine/sulfasalazine use was associated with an increased risk (aOR 1.70, 95% CI 1.26 to 2.29). This risk estimate increased when using TNF antagonist monotherapy as a reference group (aOR 3.52, 95% CI 1.93 to 6.45). Interleukin-12/23 and integrin antagonists were not associated with significantly different risk than TNF antagonist monotherapy (aOR 0.98, 95% CI 0.12 to 8.06 and aOR 2.42, 95% CI 0.59 to 9.96, respectively).ConclusionCombination therapy and thiopurines may be associated with an increased risk of severe COVID-19. No significant differences were observed when comparing classes of biologicals. These findings warrant confirmation in large population-based cohorts.MKH should be changed to MDK for co-last author line

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic due to the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has led to unprecedented loss of life and health on a global scale. COVID-19 outcomes are more severe among those with comorbid conditions, which raises concerns for patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), especially given the increased infection risk with immunosuppression used for IBD therapy.

Although age is often used as a clinical risk stratification tool, recent data have suggested that adverse outcomes are driven by frailty rather than chronological age. In this nationwide cohort study, we assessed the prevalence of frailty, and factors associated with 30-day readmission and mortality among hospitalized IBD patients. Using the Nationwide Readmission Database, we examined all patients with IBD hospitalized from 2010 to 2014. Based on index admission, we defined IBD and frailty using previously validated ICD codes. We used univariable and multivariable regression to assess risk factors associated with all-cause 30-day readmission and 30-day readmission mortality. From 2010 to 2014, 1,405,529 IBD index admissions were identified, with 152,974 (10.9%) categorized as frail. Over this time period, the prevalence of frailty increased each year from 10.20% (27,594) in 2010 to 11.45% (33,507) in 2014. On multivariable analysis, frailty was an independent predictor of readmission (aRR 1.16, 95% CI: 1.14–1.17), as well as readmission mortality (aRR 1.12, 95% CI 1.02–1.23) after adjusting for relevant clinical factors. Frailty also remained associated with readmission after stratification by IBD subtype, admission characteristics (surgical vs. non-surgical), age (patients ≥ 60 years old), and when excluding malnutrition, weight loss, and fecal incontinence as frailty indicators. Conversely, we found older age to be associated with a lower risk of readmission. Frailty, independent of age, comorbidities, and severity of admission, is associated with a higher risk of readmission and mortality among IBD patients, and is increasing in prevalence. Given frailty is a potentially modifiable risk factor, future studies prospectively assessing frailty within the IBD patient population are needed.

Background Micronutrient deficiencies are common in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). To date, the literature has focused on vitamin D, vitamin B12, and iron deficiencies. Methods We report a case series of 20 patients with IBD and vitamin C deficiency treated at a single tertiary care center. Results Sixteen (80%) patients had symptoms of clinical scurvy, including arthralgia, dry brittle hair, pigmented rash, gingivitis, easy bruising, and/or brittle nails. Eighteen patients underwent a nutritional assessment, 10 (56%) patients reported complete avoidance of fruits and vegetables, and 3 (17%) reported reduced intake of fruits and vegetables. Conclusions Vitamin C deficiency should be considered in IBD patients, particularly those with reduced fruit/vegetable intake, as it can lead to significant signs and symptoms., Lay Summary Nutritional deficiencies are common in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). This case series of patients with vitamin C deficiency and IBD highlights the signs/symptoms of vitamin C deficiency and the need for appropriate dietary counseling in patients with IBD.

Background Stress and depression are risk factors for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) exacerbations. It is unknown if resilience, or one’s ability to recover from adversity, impacts disease course. The aim of this study was to examine the association between resilience and IBD disease activity, quality of life (QoL), and IBD-related surgeries. Methods We performed a cross-sectional study of IBD patients at an academic center. Patients completed the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale questionnaire, which measures resilience (high resilience score ≥ 35). The primary outcome was IBD disease activity, measured by Mayo score and Harvey-Bradshaw Index (HBI). The QoL and IBD-related surgeries were also assessed. Multivariate linear regression was conducted to assess the association of high resilience with disease activity and QoL. Results Our patient sample comprised 92 patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) and 137 patients with Crohn disease (CD). High resilience was noted in 27% of patients with UC and 21.5% of patients with CD. Among patients with UC, those with high resilience had a mean Mayo score of 1.54, and those with low resilience had a mean Mayo score of 4.31, P < 0.001. Among patients with CD, those with high resilience had a mean HBI of 2.31, and those with low resilience had a mean HBI of 3.95, P = 0.035. In multivariable analysis, high resilience was independently associated with lower disease activity in both UC (P < 0.001) and CD (P = 0.037) and with higher QoL (P = 0.016). High resilience was also associated with fewer surgeries (P = 0.001) among patients with CD. Conclusions High resilience was independently associated with lower disease activity and better QoL in patients with IBD and fewer IBD surgeries in patients with CD. These findings suggest that resilience may be a modifiable factor that can risk-stratify patients with IBD prone to poor outcomes.

The safety and efficacy of tofacitinib in Crohn's disease (CD) has been studied in 2 phase II trials in patients with moderate-to-severe CD with no new safety signals observed, but no significant difference from placebo in the primary efficacy endpoint of clinical response.1-3 However, post hoc analyses and smaller studies have observed clinical and biologic response to tofacitinib in patients with CD.2,4,5 There is a paucity of real-world effectiveness and safety data for tofacitinib in non-Food and Drug Administration label usage in patients with CD and patients with inflammatory bowel disease-unclassified (IBD-U).

Background & Aims Adverse events (AEs) including reactivation of herpes zoster (HZ) and venous thromboembolism (VTE) have been reported from clinical trials of tofacitinib in ulcerative colitis (UC). We investigated the incidence rates of AEs in a real-world study of UC patients given tofacitinib. Methods We collected data from 260 patients with UC in the Tofacitinib Real-world Outcomes in Patients with ulceratIve colitis and Crohn’s disease consortium study, performed at 6 medical centers in the United States. Patients were followed up for a median of 6 months (interquartile range, 2.7–11.5 mo). AEs were captured using a standardized data collection instrument before study initiation and at weeks 8, 16, 26, 39, and 52. Serious AEs were defined as life-threatening or resulting in a hospitalization, disability, or discontinuation of therapy. Logistic regression was performed to examine risk factors for AEs. Results AEs occurred in 41 patients (15.7%); most were infections (N = 13; 5.0%). The incidence rate of any AE was 27.2 (95% CI, 24.4–30.7 per 100 patient-years of follow-up evaluation). Fifteen were serious AEs (36.6% of AEs), and tofacitinib was discontinued for 12 patients (4.6% of cohort). The incidence rates of serious AEs was 10.0 (95% CI, 8.9–11.2 per 100 patient-years of follow-up evaluation). Five patients developed HZ infection and 2 developed VTE (all receiving 10 mg tofacitinib, twice per day). Conclusions Real-world safety signals for tofacitinib are similar to those for clinical trials, with AEs reported from almost 16% of patients. HZ infection and VTE occurred in patients receiving 10 mg tofacitinib twice per day. These results support dose de-escalation after induction therapy, to reduce the risk of AEs.

BACKGROUND: There is a need for improved risk stratification in Crohn’s disease. AIM: To identify novel blood protein biomarkers associated with future Crohn’s disease complications METHODS: We performed a case-cohort study utilising a paediatric inception cohort, the Risk Stratification and Identification of Immunogenetic and Microbial Markers of Rapid Disease Progression in Children with Crohn’s disease (RISK) study. All patients had inflammatory disease (B1) at baseline. Outcomes were development of stricturing (B2) or penetrating (B3) complications. We assayed 92 inflammation-related proteins in baseline plasma using a proximity extension assay (Olink Proteomics). An ensemble machine learning technique, random survival forests (RSF), selected variables predicting B2 and B3 complications. Selected analytes were compared to clinical variables and serology only models. We examined selected proteins in a single-cell sequencing cohort to analyse differential cell expression in blood and ileum. RESULTS: We included 265 patients with mean age 11.6 years (standard deviation [SD] 3.2). Seventy-three and 34 patients, respectively, had B2 and B3 complications within mean 1123 (SD 477) days for B2 and 1251 (442) for B3. A model with 5 protein markers predicted B3 complications with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.79 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.760.82) compared to 0.69 (95% CI 0.66–0.72) for serologies and 0.74 (95% CI 0.71–0.77) for clinical variables. A model with 4 protein markers predicted B2 complications with an AUC of 0.68 (95% CI 0.65–0.71) compared to 0.62 (95% CI 0.59–0.65) for serologies and 0.52 (95% CI 0.50–0.55) for clinical variables. B2 analytes were highly expressed in ileal stromal cells while B3 analytes were prominent in peripheral blood and ileal T cells. CONCLUSIONS: We identified novel blood proteomic markers, distinct for B2 and B3, associated with progression of paediatric Crohn’s disease.

Background and Aims The presence of gastrointestinal symptoms and high levels of viral RNA in the stool suggest active severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) replication within enterocytes. Methods Here, in multiple, large cohorts of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), we have studied the intersections between Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19), intestinal inflammation, and IBD treatment. Results A striking expression of ACE2 on the small bowel enterocyte brush border supports intestinal infectivity by SARS-CoV-2. Commonly used IBD medications, both biologic and nonbiologic, do not significantly impact ACE2 and TMPRSS2 receptor expression in the uninflamed intestines. In addition, we have defined molecular responses to COVID-19 infection that are also enriched in IBD, pointing to shared molecular networks between COVID-19 and IBD. Conclusions These data generate a novel appreciation of the confluence of COVID-19– and IBD-associated inflammation and provide mechanistic insights supporting further investigation of specific IBD drugs in the treatment of COVID-19. Preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.21.109124

BACKGROUND: There is an increasing body of evidence showing that earlier use of biologics improves clinical outcomes in Crohn’s disease (CD). AIM: To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the impact of early biologic use in the treatment of CD. METHODS: PubMed and Embase databases were searched for English language papers and conference abstracts published through April 30, 2019. Studies were selected for inclusion if patients initiated biologics within 2 years of a CD diagnosis or if earlier biologics use (top-down) was compared to a conventional step-up strategy. Random-effects meta-analyses were conducted to compare clinical remission (CR), relapse and endoscopic healing rates between early biologic treatment (2 years of disease duration or conventional step-up treatment strategy). RESULTS: A total of 3,069 records were identified, of which 47 references met the selection criteria for systematic review. A total of 18,471 patients were studied, with a median follow-up of 64 weeks (range 10–416). Meta-analysis found that early use of biologics was associated with higher rates of clinical remission (OR 2.10 [95% CI: 1.69–2.60], n=2763, P

Noninvasive tests to measure endoscopic activity in patients with Crohn's disease (CD) have limitations. We aimed to develop a test to identify patients in remission, based on endoscopic analysis, and monitor CD activity based on serum levels of proteins.We developed a test to measure 13 proteins in blood (ANG1, ANG2, CRP, SAA1, IL7, EMMPRIN, MMP1, MMP2, MMP3, MMP9, TGFA, CEACAM1, and VCAM1), called the endoscopic healing index [EHI], using samples from 278 patients with CD from a multinational training cohort. We validated the test using 2 independent cohorts of patients with CD: 116 biologic-naive patients with early-stage CD (validation cohort 1) and 195 biologic-exposed patients with chronic CD (validation cohort 2). The ability of the test to identify patients with active disease vs patients in remission (defined as a simple endoscopic score for CD of ≤2 and ≤1 in each segment, or a total CD endoscopic index of severity score3) was assessed by using area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) analysis. The diagnostic accuracy of the test was compared with that of measurement of serum C-reactive protein (CRP) and fecal calprotectin.The EHI scores range from 0 to 100 units; higher scores indicate more severe CD activity, based on endoscopy findings. The EHI identified patients in remission with an AUROC of 0.962 in validation cohort 1 (95% confidence interval, 0.942-0.982) and an AUROC of 0.693 in validation cohort 2 (95% confidence interval, 0.619-0.767), regardless of CD location or phenotype. A cutoff value of 20 points identified patients in remission with the highest level of sensitivity (97.1% in validation cohort 1 and 83.2% in validation cohort 2), with specificity values of 69.0% and 36.6%, respectively. A cutoff value of 50 points identified patients in remission with the highest level of specificity (100% in validation cohort 1 and 87.8% in validation cohort 2), with sensitivity values of 37.3% and 30.0%, respectively. The EHI identified patients in remission with a significantly higher AUROC value than the test for CRP (0.876, P.001 in validation cohort 1 and 0.624, P = .109 in validation cohort 2). In analysis of patients with available FC measurements, the AUROC value for the EHI did not differ significantly from that of measurement of FC (AUROC, 0.950 for EHI vs AUROC, 0.923 for FC; P = .147 in validation cohort 1 and AUROC, 0.803 for EHI vs AUROC, 0.854 for FC; P = .298 in validation cohort 2).We developed an index called the EHI to identify patients with CD in endoscopic remission based on blood levels of 13 proteins. The EHI identified patients with resolution of endoscopic disease activity, with good overall accuracy, although with variation between the 2 cohorts assessed. The EHI AUROC values were comparable to measurement of FC and higher than measurement of serum CRP. The test might be used in practice to assess endoscopic activity in patients with CD.

SummaryBackground Case series suggest a possible association between bariatric surgery and incident IBD. Aim The aim of this study was to evaluate the association between bariatric surgery and new-onset IBD. Methods We first conducted a multi-institutional case series of patients with a history of IBD and bariatric surgery. We next conducted a matched case-control study using medical and pharmacy claims from 2008 to 2012 in a US national database from Source Healthcare Analytics LLC. Bariatric surgery was defined by ICD-9 or CPT code. Bariatric surgery was evaluated as recent (code in database timeframe), past (past history V code) or no history. Conditional logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios (OR) and 95% CI for new-onset IBD, CD and UC. Results A total of 15 cases of IBD (10 CD, 4 UC, 1 IBD, type unclassified) with a prior history of bariatric surgery were identified. Most cases were women, had Roux-en-Y surgery years prior to diagnosis and few IBD-related complications. A total of 8980 cases and 43 059 controls were included in our database analysis. Adjusting for confounders, a past history of bariatric surgery was associated with an increased risk of new-onset IBD (OR 1.93, 95% CI 1.34-2.79). However, patients who had recent bariatric surgery did not appear to be at shorter term risk of IBD (OR 0.94, 95% CI 0.58-1.52). Conclusion New-onset IBD was significantly associated with a past history of bariatric surgery. This potential association needs to be confirmed in future prospective studies.

Cigarette smoking is one of the most important, modifiable environmental factors in Crohn's disease (CD) and screening for tobacco use is an official recommendation and quality measure in the care of CD patients. The objective of this study was to learn more about gastroenterologists' practices, opinions, and knowledge in this area.A 15 question survey was sent through email to two national gastroenterology distribution lists. Questions were written in multiple choice formats and were designed to collect information about gastroenterologists' practices, attitudes, and knowledge regarding smoking cessation in CD patients. Responses were stratified by practice setting, experience, and inflammatory bowel disease-focus. Responses were anonymous and were collected in a secure, online database.A total of 141 respondents completed the survey. Overall, 89% of participants screened their CD patients for smoking more than 75% of the time. In all, 62% provided smoking cessation counseling more than 75% of the time. Overall, 94% of respondents felt comfortable discussing the benefits of smoking cessation with their patients. In all, 56% felt comfortable discussing smoking cessation strategies with their patients. Overall, 88% of respondents agreed that gastroenterologists should provide smoking cessation counseling; however, 43 and 11% agreed that the gastroenterologist should be the primary counselor and primary prescriber of cessation-related pharmacotherapy, respectively.Surveyed gastroenterologists agree that smoking cessation is an important part of the care of CD patients and this is reflected in their screening practices. Counseling occurs irregularly and many gastroenterologists do not feel comfortable discussing cessation strategies. Future guidelines should provide further guidance on the gastroenterologist's role in smoking cessation counseling for CD patients.

Background Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) require frequent colonoscopies to optimize disease management and treatment strategies. At the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, many routine procedures were postponed to reduce the overall burden on healthcare systems. We characterized the impact of COVID-19 on IBD care by conducting an exploratory analysis of real-world US healthcare claims data to identify changes in treatment patterns and the number of colonoscopy procedures performed in patients with IBD during the first wave of the pandemic. Methods De-identified, open-source health insurance claims data, from Jan 2019 to Oct 2020, were obtained from the Symphony Health Integrated Dataverse® for US adults aged 18–80 years with IBD. Four outcome measures were used: number of colonoscopies performed; number of new biologic treatment initiations or treatment switches; number of new biologic treatment initiations or treatment switches in patients who had a colonoscopy within the previous 60 days; and rate of telehealth consultations per 1000 patients per month. Results During Jan–Dec 2019 and Jan–Oct 2020, 1.54 million and 1.29 million patients with IBD, respectively, were included. The bimonthly number of colonoscopies remained stable throughout 2019, with a maximum change of +5.4% in Jul–Aug (N = 49947) vs Jan–Feb 2019 (N = 47399). Colonoscopy use decreased by 4.7% in Jan–Feb 2020 (N = 45167) vs the same period in 2019. In Mar–Apr 2020, colonoscopy numbers decreased by 55.3% (N = 20191) vs Jan–Feb 2020 (Figure 1a); a reduction of 59.4% vs Mar–Apr 2019 (N = 49780). In May–Jun 2020 (−23.8%) and Jul–Aug 2020 (+2.0%) the difference vs Jan–Feb 2020 gradually decreased (Figure 1a). Bimonthly numbers of new treatment initiations or treatment switches in 2019 varied by up to 6.9% vs Jan–Feb 2019. In May–Jun 2020, numbers of new treatment initiations or treatment switches decreased by 17.0% (N = 10072) vs Jan–Feb 2020 (N = 12133) (Figure 1b); a decrease of 19.3% vs May–Jun 2019 (N = 12488). The number of new treatment initiations or treatment switches in patients who had a colonoscopy within the previous 60 days decreased by 42.5% (N = 892) in Mar–Apr 2020 vs Jan–Feb 2020 (N = 1551) (Figure 1c); a decrease of 44.2% vs Mar–Apr 2019 (N = 1599). Telehealth utilization increased in March 2020 and remained higher than in 2019 up to October 2020 (Figure 2). Conclusion Reduction in colonoscopies and subsequent initiation/switching of treatments during the COVID-19 pandemic first wave suggests lost opportunities for therapy optimization that may have an impact on longer-term patient outcomes. Increased utilization of telehealth services may have helped address gaps in routine clinical care.

Background Pivotal trials have shown that ustekinumab (UST) is effective in ulcerative colitis (UC). However, the population included in these trials do not always represent the cohort of patients treated in the “real world”. In this study, we aimed to describe the effectiveness and safety of UST in a clinical cohort of patients with UC Methods We performed a multi-center cohort study and included patients with active UC starting UST. Variables collected included demographics, previous and current UC medications, disease activity (measured using partial and endoscopic Mayo score [PMS and EMS]) at 8 weeks, 6 months and end of follow-up. We also abstracted UST drug level and anti-UST antibodies (AUA), albumin and C-reactive protein levels. Primary outcomes were clinical response at week 8 defined as a reduction of 3 points in the PMS or PMS Results Ninety-five patients were included with a median age of 42 years (IQR:32-57) and 53 (56%) were female. Median follow-up was 5 months (IQR:2.2-7.4). Only 4 (4.3%) were naïve to biologics or tofacitinib and 62 (66%) had previous exposure to at least 2 other biologics. No variables were found to be associated with response at week 8 (Figure 2). Those patients who responded at week 8 had higher median albumin levels vs those who did not (median of 4.4 [IQR: 4.1-4.6] vs 4.1 g/dL [IQR:3.8-4.3]; p=0.02). There were no differences in baseline CRP levels (1mg/dL [IQR:0.6-2.8] vs 0.6 mg/dL [0.3-1.5]; p=0.06). Among the 33 patients who had follow-up endoscopic assessment, 7 (21.2%) had achieved endoscopic remission and 4 (12%) achieved histologic remission. Median UST level was 4.1 mcg/ml (IQR:2.5-5.1) and no patients had detectable AUA. Five patients underwent colectomy (5.3%). Only 6 patients (6.6%) presented with an AE (all minor that included, rash, headaches, arthralgias and infection). Conclusion In a population enriched with refractory UC, UST was well tolerated and induce response and remission in a significant number of patients. The rate of response was lower in obese patients and those with extensive colitis but was not associated with previous exposure to biologics and/or tofacitinib. Larger studies with a longer follow-up are warranted. Figure 1: Rates of clinical response and remission in patients with UC receiving ustekinumab Figure 2: Association between several baseline characteristics and response to ustekinumab in UC

Background Observational studies suggest non-white patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) have worse clinical outcomes.1 There are limited data on whether race impacts response to biologic therapy. We therefore aimed to evaluate the efficacy of the tumor necrosis factor (TNF) antagonist golimumab comparing white to non-white participants, using individual participant level data from phase 2/3 randomized clinical trials of TNF antagonist therapy in ulcerative colitis (UC). Methods We conducted a pooled analysis of individual-level data from the induction and maintenance trials of golimumab in UC accessible through Yale University Open Data Access Project (YODA). There were insufficient non-white participants in infliximab studies accessible through YODA, precluding meaningful analysis. We analyzed patients in the placebo and treatment arms separately. Our primary outcome was clinical response and secondary outcomes were clinical remission and endoscopic healing according to clinical trial definitions. We compared white and non-white (defined as Black, Asian, or Other race) participants using multivariable logistic regression a priori adjusting for age, sex, treatment group, baseline Mayo score, immunomodulator and corticosteroid use. Effect estimates were expressed as adjusted odds ratios (aOR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). Results A total of 1,006 participants were included in the induction trial (PURSUIT-SC; 18% non-white) and 783 participants in the maintenance trial (PURSUIT-M; 17% non-white). Non-white participants had significantly lower odds of week 6 clinical response (aOR 0.43, 95%CI 0.28–0.66), clinical remission (aOR 0.41, 95%CI 0.22–0.77) and endoscopic remission (aOR 0.48, 95%CI 0.30–0.74) compared to white participants (Figure). Non-white participants also had a lower adjusted odds of week 30 clinical response (aOR 0.64, 95%CI 0.40–1.01), clinical remission (aOR 0.45, 95%CI 0.28–0.74), and endoscopic remission (aOR 0.62, 95%CI 0.41–0.96). By week 54, the lower odds of these outcomes among non-whites were no longer statistically significant (Figure). Conclusion Non-white UC patients were less likely to achieve clinical response, clinical remission, and endoscopic healing with golimumab compared to white patients in these clinical trials. Further studies are needed to understand these differences and whether they are observed with other drugs or outside the context of clinical trials. Reference

Background Prior data have suggested that 5-aminosalicylates (5-ASA) may be associated with an increased risk of severe COVID-19 among inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients. We aimed to evaluate the association of 5-ASA with severe COVID-19 in a large cohort of IBD patients. Methods We analyzed data from the Surveillance Epidemiology of Coronavirus Under Research Exclusion for Inflammatory Bowel Disease (SECURE-IBD) registry, a large, international database of IBD patients with confirmed COVID-19. The primary outcome was severe COVID-19, defined as intensive care unit admission, ventilator use, and/or death. Hospitalization due to COVID-19 was a secondary outcome. We performed multivariable regression modeling with a generalized estimating equation accounting for country as a random effect to analyze the association of 5-ASA with severe COVID-19. Models a priori included age, sex, race, disease phenotype (CD or UC/IBD-U), corticosteroid use, azathioprine/6-mercaptopurine use, TNF antagonist use, disease activity by physician global assessment, number of comorbidities, and days from SECURE-IBD inception to reporting. We constructed three models examining 5-ASA use as binary covariate using 1) all patients, 2) only patients on any biologic, and 3) only patients on TNF antagonists. Results 5,174 patients were included with 212 (4.1%) severe COVID-19 events. At the time of COVID-19 infection, 1,504 patients were taking 5-ASA. 5-ASA patients were older (mean age 44 vs. 38.3 years, p Conclusion In an analysis of updated data from the SECURE-IBD registry, 5-ASA use was not associated with worse outcomes among IBD patients with COVID-19.

Key Points Question Is receipt of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitor monotherapy at the time of COVID-19 diagnosis associated with adverse COVID-19 outcomes compared with other treatment regimens among patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs)? Findings In this cohort study of 6077 patients with IMIDs and COVID-19, TNF inhibitors in combination with azathioprine/6-mercaptopurine therapy, methotrexate monotherapy, azathioprine/6-mercaptopurine monotherapy, or Janus kinase inhibitor monotherapy were each associated with significantly higher odds of hospitalization or death compared with TNF inhibitor monotherapy. Meaning This study’s findings support the continued use of TNF inhibitor monotherapy among individuals with IMIDs during the pandemic., Importance Although tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors are widely prescribed globally because of their ability to ameliorate shared immune pathways across immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs), the impact of COVID-19 among individuals with IMIDs who are receiving TNF inhibitors remains insufficiently understood. Objective To examine the association between the receipt of TNF inhibitor monotherapy and the risk of COVID-19–associated hospitalization or death compared with other commonly prescribed immunomodulatory treatment regimens among adult patients with IMIDs. Design, Setting, and Participants This cohort study was a pooled analysis of data from 3 international COVID-19 registries comprising individuals with rheumatic diseases, inflammatory bowel disease, and psoriasis from March 12, 2020, to February 1, 2021. Clinicians directly reported COVID-19 outcomes as well as demographic and clinical characteristics of individuals with IMIDs and confirmed or suspected COVID-19 using online data entry portals. Adults (age ≥18 years) with a diagnosis of inflammatory arthritis, inflammatory bowel disease, or psoriasis were included. Exposures Treatment exposure categories included TNF inhibitor monotherapy (reference treatment), TNF inhibitors in combination with methotrexate therapy, TNF inhibitors in combination with azathioprine/6-mercaptopurine therapy, methotrexate monotherapy, azathioprine/6-mercaptopurine monotherapy, and Janus kinase (Jak) inhibitor monotherapy. Main Outcomes and Measures The main outcome was COVID-19–associated hospitalization or death. Registry-level analyses and a pooled analysis of data across the 3 registries were conducted using multilevel multivariable logistic regression models, adjusting for demographic and clinical characteristics and accounting for country, calendar month, and registry-level correlations. Results A total of 6077 patients from 74 countries were included in the analyses; of those, 3215 individuals (52.9%) were from Europe, 3563 individuals (58.6%) were female, and the mean (SD) age was 48.8 (16.5) years. The most common IMID diagnoses were rheumatoid arthritis (2146 patients [35.3%]) and Crohn disease (1537 patients [25.3%]). A total of 1297 patients (21.3%) were hospitalized, and 189 patients (3.1%) died. In the pooled analysis, compared with patients who received TNF inhibitor monotherapy, higher odds of hospitalization or death were observed among those who received a TNF inhibitor in combination with azathioprine/6-mercaptopurine therapy (odds ratio [OR], 1.74; 95% CI, 1.17-2.58; P = .006), azathioprine/6-mercaptopurine monotherapy (OR, 1.84; 95% CI, 1.30-2.61; P = .001), methotrexate monotherapy (OR, 2.00; 95% CI, 1.57-2.56; P, This cohort study uses data from 3 international registries to examine the association between the receipt of tumor necrosis factor monotherapy and the risk of COVID-19–associated hospitalization or death among adult patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases.

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has affected more than 29 million people and led to more than 542,000 deaths in the United States.1 Older age, comorbidities, and racial and ethnic minority status are associated with severe COVID-19.2 Among patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), racial and ethnic minorities have worse outcomes, mediated in part by inequitable health care access.3 Racial and ethnic minority patients with IBD and COVID-19 may be an especially vulnerable population. The purpose of this study was to evaluate racial and ethnic disparities in COVID-19 outcomes among IBD patients and the impact of non-IBD comorbidities on observed disparities.

Introduction The emotional health of patients with IBD has been difficult to elucidate in routine IBD care, but is critical to medication adoption, adherence and self-management. Patients often are unsure how to communicate their preferences and concerns to their providers in ways that could directly inform shared decision making. Photovoice is an established research methodology used to give vulnerable patients a voice through alternative communication strategies, but has not been previously used in IBD. Aim Our goal was to determine the acceptability and feasibility of developing a communication tool using photovoice in an IBD clinic. The ultimate goal is to adapt Photovoice to facilitate doctor – patient communication around treatment and wellness goals in the clinic setting. Methods We recruited patients at a single tertiary care IBD center in 2019 to participate in a pilot Photovoice study. Patients received a digital camera, training on basic usage and 10 disease specific prompts focused on goals/strategies they used to manage IBD. For example, “What is the most important thing for your doctor to know about you?” Patients then participated in in-depth interviews where they shared the photos they took and described rationale for their photo choice. The interviews lasted approximately one hour and were audio recorded and professionally transcribed. Three analysts coded transcripts for themes using qualitative analysis software QSR NVivo 11. Subsequently, five physicians were recruited and also participated in in-depth interviews to gauge provider feasibility of incorporating Photovoice into clinical practice. Results Fifteen patients were enrolled, median age 28 IQR (24–40), 66% women, 86% white. Three patients (20%) identified as Hispanic and six (40%) identified as Ashkenazi Jewish. Fourteen transcripts were available for analysis (9 patient and 5 providers). A total of 87 photos were taken and reviewed with patients, with a subset of 15 photos reviewed with physicians. The general themes from patients were physical and psychological aspects of disease, logistical/practical aspects, and future with IBD. Physician response was overwhelmingly supportive of incorporating Photovoice into clinical practice and suggested several ways to incorporate: 1. As discrete parts of visits to foster goal-setting and identify patient priorities. 2. Displayed in the hallways of the clinic to foster community among patients. 3. As part of electronic medical records or as prompts in the waiting room to generate referrals to other resources like psychotherapy, social work and diet consults. Conclusions Photovoice is a feasible methodology for patients with IBD and acceptable to providers to use in a clinical setting. Photovoice may help providers identify patient concerns and tailor their communication and enhance approaches to shared decision making.

Despite improvements in medical management, 10%-15% of patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) require total proctocolectomy (TPC) with ileal pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA) for refractory disease.1 Acute pouchitis is the most common post-IPAA inflammatory condition, with cumulative incidence of 45% at 5 years.2 Up to 20%-30% of patients develop chronic pouch inflammation (CPI), categorized as antibiotic responsive, antibiotic refractory, or Crohn's disease-like (CDL).3.

Background and aims Disease extent in ulcerative colitis [UC] is dynamic and can progress over time. Little is known about risk factors for UC extension in the era of biologics. We investigated the risk of UC extension and subsequent risk of surgery in a Danish population-based cohort. Methods All incident UC cases in a strictly defined Copenhagen area between 2003 and 2004 were followed prospectively through 2011. Disease extension was defined as patients with limited UC [E1 or E2] at diagnosis having progressed from the initial extent by colonoscopy or surgery to E2 or extensive colitis [E3]. Associations between progression or colectomy and multiple covariates were analysed by Cox regression analysis. Results Of 300 UC patients, 220 [73%] had E1 or E2 at diagnosis. During follow-up, 50 [23%] patients with E1/E2 progressed to E3, and 22 [10%] with E1 progressed to E2. Disease extent at diagnosis was the sole predictor of extension to E3. A total of 18 [8%] patients with E1/E2 at diagnosis had a colectomy. Progression from E1/E2 to E3, female gender and a history of smoking were risk factors for colectomy. Conclusion After 7 years of follow-up, 33% of patients with limited UC experienced disease extension. Only extent at diagnosis was a clinical predictor for disease extension. The risk of colectomy was increased in former smokers and patients who progressed to extensive colitis. This highlights the need to prevent disease progression in patients with limited UC, and to identify new histological or molecular markers that might help stratify risks for disease progression.

Background The impact of discontinuing vs. continuing thiopurines at anti-TNF initiation in thiopurine experienced patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is unclear. Methods We used the nationwide Danish registers to establish a national cohort of patients with IBD who received thiopurines prior to initiating anti-TNF during 2003–2014. We compared patients who discontinued vs. continued thiopurine within 90 days of anti-TNF initiation. Our primary outcome was a composite of any clinical event: corticosteroids, hospitalisation, surgery, or death. We used Cox regression models to calculate adjusted hazard ratios (aHR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Analyses were adjusted for sex, diagnosis-age, IBD-subtype, disease duration, calendar year, pre-anti-TNF thiopurine duration, and past disease severity including hospitalisations the past year, surgery past 5 years, and corticosteroid use the past year. Results Of 6998 anti-TNF exposed, 1602 patients (Crohn’s disease, n = 1000, ulcerative colitis, n = 602) received thiopurines prior to anti-TNF. Of these, 489 (44%) received thiopurines for more than 180 days. At anti-TNF initiation, 503 patients discontinued thiopurines and were followed for a median 3.54 years and 1099 continued thiopurines with a median follow-up of 3.92 years. Discontinuing thiopurines at anti-TNF initiation statistically significantly increased the risk of the composite outcome (aHR 1.25; 95% CI 1.09 to 1.45). Analyses of the individual outcomes revealed a statistically significantly increased risk of later corticosteroid use in thiopurine discontinuers (aHR 1.31; 95% CI 1.11 to 1.56), but no increased risk of the remaining outcomes. IR; incidence rate, HR; hazard ratio, CI; confidence interval, IBD; inflammatory bowel disease. P-value is the test of interaction between the variable and the treatment groups. Conclusion In our nationwide cohort study of patients with IBD, we found that continuing thiopurines after anti-TNF initiation impacted the outcome favourably, especially regarding corticosteroid use. Further studies are warranted to investigate this central clinical question.

Background Among the adaptive immune cells, B cells, dominated by IgA producing plasma cells (PC), are critical for intestinal homeostasis. However, the B-cell response remains under studied in ulcerative colitis (UC). Methods Using single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA seq), single-cell IgH sequencing (sc IgH seq), multiparameter flow cytometry (FC), mass cytometry (MC) and immunofluorescent microscopy (IF), we have comprehensively defined the landscape of intestinal and circulating B cells in patients with UC. A Cohort of 88 patients with active UC, 14 patients with quiescent UC and 43 healthy volunteers were recruited. Two validation cohorts comprising of 53 patients with active UC, 59 patients with quiescent UC and 65 healthy volunteers (Validation cohort 1) and 65 patients with active UC, 42 patients with quiescent UC and 36 healthy volunteers (Validation cohort 2) were also studied. Results scRNA seq and FC demonstrate a dramatic increase in proliferating (Ki67+) plasmablasts (PB) as well as IgG+ PC in the inflamed colon of UC patients. Additionally, a significant increase in short-lived (CD19+CD45+) PC was observed during colonic inflammation. scIgH seq further demonstrates a significant decrease in somatic hypermutations and the diversity of intestinal PC of patients with active UC. Genes associated with Fc-dependent macrophage signalling were enriched in areas of active disease and were associated with non-response to TNF therapy. In circulation, a significant increase in a4b7+ gut-homing PC was noted that related to disease extent, severity and complications (defined by treatment non-response, hospitalisations and surgery). Conclusion Active UC results in an immature, IgG-dominated PB/PC response in inflamed GI tissue and an increase in the frequency of gut-homing PC in circulation that relates to disease activity and complications and may be used to monitor disease course. These data provide novel insights into the pathogenesis of UC with major implications for existing and emerging therapeutic agents.

Background The Lémann index (LI) is the first instrument developed to measure cumulative structural bowel damage in Crohn’s disease (CD).1 We here report its validation. Methods This was an international, multicentre, prospective cross-sectional observational study. At each centre, 10 inclusions, stratified by known or suspected CD location and duration, were planned. Clinical examination and abdominal MRI had to be performed in all patients, and upper endoscopy, colonoscopy, and pelvic MRI according to CD location. Upper tract (UT), small bowel (SB), colon/rectum (CR), and anus (AN) were divided into 3, 20, 6 and 1 segments, respectively. History of previous surgery was collected per segment. For each segment, 1 gastroenterologist and 1 radiologist per centre, identified the presence of predefined stricturing and/or penetrating lesions of maximal severity (grade 1 to 3) at each investigation. They provided a damage evaluation for each non-resected segment ranging from 0 to 10, 10 corresponding to the damage of a completely resected segment. Investigator organ damage evaluation was calculated as the sum of segmental damage evaluations. Finally, investigators provided a global damage evaluation from 0 to 10 for each patient according to the 4 organ damage scores, calculated as a function of investigator organ damage evaluations, resections and a total number of segments. The correlation between the investigator global damage evaluation and the LI was high on the construction sample, since coefficients to derive the LI were estimated by maximising this correlation, and is expected to be lower on data obtained in new patients by new investigators. Thus, the LI would be validated if the linear regression model of investigator global damage evaluation on LI shows a still high correlation. The same applies to investigator damage evaluation of each organ and each organ component of the LI. Results 134 patients were included in 15 centres, 7 to 10 per centre. Correlation coefficients between investigator organ damage evaluation and each organ component of the LI were 0.91, 0.96, 0.95, and 0.81, for UT, SB, CR and AN, respectively. The correlation coefficient between investigator global damage evaluation and the LI was 0.98 (Figure 1). Proportions of the investigator organ damage evaluation variance explained by each organ component of the LI were 82%, 91%, 89%, 65%, for UT, SB, CR, AN, respectively. This proportion was 96% for the investigator global damage evaluation and the LI. Conclusion The Lémann index is now a validated index to assess cumulative bowel damage in CD that can be used in epidemiological studies and disease modification trials. Reference

BACKGROUND: The significance of endoscopic activity in asymptomatic ulcerative colitis (UC) patients with an ileal pouch is unknown. AIM: We aimed to understand the association of endoscopic pouch activity in asymptomatic patients with the development of pouchitis. METHODS: We analyzed a retrospective cohort of patients with UC or IBD-Unspecified (IBD-U) who underwent a total proctocolectomy with ileal pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA). Asymptomatic patients with a Pouchitis Disease Activity Index (PDAI) symptom sub-score of zero who underwent an index surveillance pouchoscopy were included. Endoscopic pouch body activity was graded as 0: normal, 1: mucosal inflammation, or 2: mucosal breaks (ulcers and/or erosions). The primary outcome was primary acute idiopathic pouchitis defined as PDAI score ≥ 7 with symptoms lasting less than four weeks and responsive to standard antibiotics, not otherwise meeting criteria for secondary pouchitis. The secondary outcome was chronic idiopathic pouchitis defined as PDAI score ≥ 7 with symptoms lasting greater than four weeks despite standard antibiotics. Predictors of pouchitis were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression methods with hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) reported. RESULTS: A total of 143 asymptomatic pouch patients were included. Index endoscopic pouch body activity was graded as 0 in 86 (60.1%) patients, 1 in 26 (18.2%) patients and 2 in 31 (21.7%) patients. The median length of follow-up after index surveillance pouchoscopy was 3.03 [IQR 1.24–4.60] years. Primary acute idiopathic pouchitis occurred in 44 (31%) patients and chronic idiopathic pouchitis in 12 (8.4%) patients. Grade 2 endoscopic pouch activity was associated with the development of acute pouchitis (HR 2.39, 95% CI 1.23–4.67), however not chronic pouchitis (HR 1.76, 95% CI 0.53–5.87). Histologic inflammation in endoscopically normal pouch mucosa was not associated with acute or chronic pouchitis. CONCLUSIONS: Mucosal breaks are present in nearly a quarter of asymptomatic pouch patients and are associated with an increased risk of acute pouchitis.

PURPOSE: Despite advances in biologic therapy, approximately 10–15% of ulcerative colitis (UC) patients require surgery. We aimed to (1) examine the rates of emergent colectomy and elective ileal pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA) over time among UC patients in the USA and (2) investigate disparities in surgery rates by patient demographics. METHODS: Data from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) from 2000 to 2014were analyzed. Inclusion criteria were admissions with a primary UC ICD-9-CM diagnosis code and age > 18. Emergent cases were defined as those admitted through the emergency room with an outcome ICD-9-CM code for subtotal colectomy. Elective IPAA cases were defined with an outcome ICD-9-CM code for IPAA, used as a surrogate measure of colectomy. Patient and hospital-level demographics were analyzed. Temporal trends of colectomy were analyzed utilizing joinpoint-regression analysis with calculation of annual percentage change (APC). RESULTS: A total of 470,708 admissions were included over the 14-year period. Emergent colectomy rate significantly declined (APC − 7.35%, p = 0.0002), while the rate of elective IPAA remained stable (APC − 0.21%, p = 0.8). Emergent colectomy rates declined similarly across all demographics, though not as marked among patients age 50 and older and Medicare patients. Elective IPAA rates were significantly lower among blacks and patients with public insurance. CONCLUSIONS: There has been a significant decline in emergent UC colectomy rates in the USA; however, the overall need for surgery appears unchanged given stable IPAA rates. This suggests a limited impact on overall surgery rates with a shift from emergent to elective procedures.

Background: Vedolizumab is a gut‐selective antibody to α4β7 integrin approved to treat moderate‐to‐severe Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis in adults. Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and immunosuppressant use are associated with increased risk of malignancy. Aim: To analyse the incidence of malignancy with vedolizumab treatment in the GEMINI long‐term safety (LTS) study and post‐marketing (PM) setting. Methods: Malignancy data from the LTS study (May 2009 to May 2018), and data from the vedolizumab Global Safety Database (20 May 2014 to 19 May 2018), were identified using Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities coding. The number of patients experiencing malignancies in the LTS study (excluding malignancies within 1 year following vedolizumab initiation) was indirectly standardised against the number expected, using age‐ and sex‐specific rates in patients with IBD from Optum's Clinformatics™ Data Mart (CDM) database. Results: Among 1785 patients with ≥1 year of follow‐up post‐vedolizumab initiation in the LTS study (total 5670 patient‐years), observed numbers of malignancies were similar to those expected compared with CDM data (31 vs 29; ratio of observed to expected events = 1.08; P = 0.71; 95% confidence intervals [CI] 0.73, 1.53). The most common malignancies were renal and bladder (6). PM, 293 patients reported 299 malignancies (including malignancies within 1 year following vedolizumab initiation), in approximately 208 050 patient‐years of vedolizumab exposure. Lower gastrointestinal malignancies were most common (59). Conclusions: The number of malignancies in the LTS study was similar to that expected from an IBD population with no statistically significant differences, although few confounders could be corrected for. Limitations of PM safety reporting require consideration; however, the number of malignancies with vedolizumab appeared low.

Background Total proctocolectomy (TPC) with ileal pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA) is the gold standard surgery for ulcerative colitis (UC) patients with medically refractory disease. The aim of this study was to report the rates and risk factors of inflammatory pouch conditions. Methods This was a retrospective review of UC or IBD unspecified (IBDU) patients who underwent TPC with IPAA for refractory disease or dysplasia between 2008 and 2017. Pouchoscopy data were used to calculate rates of inflammatory pouch conditions. Factors associated with outcomes in univariable analysis were investigated in multivariable analysis. Results Of the 621 patients more than 18 years of age who underwent TPC with IPAA between January 2008 and December 2017, pouchoscopy data were available for 386 patients during a median follow-up period of 4 years. Acute pouchitis occurred in 205 patients (53%), 60 of whom (30%) progressed to chronic pouchitis. Cuffitis and Crohn's disease–like condition (CDLC) of the pouch occurred in 119 (30%) patients and 46 (12%) patients, respectively. In multivariable analysis, female sex was associated with a decreased risk of acute pouchitis, and pre-operative steroid use and medically refractory disease were associated with an increased risk; IBDU was associated with chronic pouchitis; rectal cuff length ≥2 cm and medically refractory disease were associated with cuffitis; age 45–54 at colectomy was associated with CDLC. Rates of pouch failure were similar in chronic pouchitis and CDLC patients treated with biologics and those who were not. Conclusions Inflammatory pouch conditions are common. Biologic use for chronic pouchitis and CDLC does not impact the rate of pouch failure.

Background Severe and fulminant Clostridioides difficile infection is associated with high mortality rates. While faecal microbiota transplant has been shown to be effective for recurrent C difficile infection, there is little data on the utility of faecal microbiota transplant in severe or fulminant C difficile infection. Aim To compare the outcomes of antibiotics and faecal microbiota transplantation vs antibiotics alone (standard of care) in critically ill patients with severe or fulminant C difficile infection. Methods This was a retrospective, matched cohort study in one urban tertiary academic care centre including 48 patients hospitalised with severe or fulminant C difficile infection who required care in intensive care unit. Results Patients who received faecal microbiota transplantation (n = 16) had a 77% decrease in odds for mortality (OR 0.23, 95% CI 0.06-0.97) with a number needed to treat of 3 to prevent one death. Conclusions Faecal microbiota transplantation provides mortality benefit over standard of care for severe and fulminant C difficile infection and should be considered in critically ill patients.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: We investigated the effects of inducing deep remission in patients with early Crohn's disease (CD). METHODS: We collected follow-up data from 122 patients (mean age, 31.2 ± 11.3 y) with early, moderate to severe CD (median duration, 0.2 years; interquartile range, 0.1-0.5) who participated in the Effect of Tight Control Management on CD (CALM) study, at 31 sites, representing 50% of the original CALM patient population. Fifty percent of patients (n = 61) were randomly assigned to a tight control strategy (increased therapy based on fecal level of calprotectin, serum level of C-reactive protein, and symptoms), and 50% were assigned to conventional management. We categorized patients as those who were vs were not in deep remission (CD endoscopic index of severity scores below 4, with no deep ulcerations or steroid treatment, for 8 or more weeks) at the end of the follow-up period (median, 3.02 years; range, 0.05-6.26 years). The primary outcome was a composite of major adverse outcomes that indicate CD progression during the follow-up period: new internal fistulas or abscesses, strictures, perianal fistulas or abscesses, or hospitalization or surgery for CD. Kaplan-Meier and penalized Cox regression with bootstrapping were used to compare composite rates between patients who achieved or did not achieve remission at the end of the follow-up period. RESULTS: Major adverse outcomes were reported for 34 patients (27.9%) during the follow-up period. Significantly fewer patients in deep remission at the end of the CALM study had major adverse outcomes during the follow-up period (P = .01). When we adjusted for potential confounders, deep remission (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.19; 95% confidence interval, 0.07-0.31) was significantly associated with a lower risk of major adverse outcome. CONCLUSIONS: In an analysis of follow-up data from the CALM study, we associated induction of deep remission in early, moderate to severe CD with decreased risk of disease progression over a median time of 3 years, regardless of tight control or conventional management strategy. ispartof: GASTROENTEROLOGY vol:159 issue:1 pages:139-147 ispartof: location:United States status: published

Background Few data are currently available on the initial presenting symptoms of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Methods We evaluated the initial symptom presentation of patients with IBD in the Ocean State Crohn’s and Colitis Area Registry (OSCCAR), a community-based inception cohort that enrolled Rhode Island IBD patients at time of diagnosis with longitudinal follow up. A 41-question symptom inventory was administered at time of enrollment to capture symptoms experienced during the 4 weeks preceding diagnosis of IBD. Frequencies of presenting symptoms were calculated. Principal component analysis (PCA) with promax rotation was used to examine possible symptom profiles among Crohn’s disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) patients, respectively. Using the Scree plot, the 4-component solution was found to be optimal for both CD and UC. Results A total of 233 CD and 150 UC patients were included. The most common presenting symptoms in CD were tiredness/fatigue (80.6%) and abdominal pain (80.4%) while passage of blood with bowel movements (BM) (86.6%) and loose/watery BMs (86.5%) were most common in UC. The 5 symptoms with greatest differences between UC and CD were passage of blood with BM (UC 86.6%/CD 45.3%), urgent BM (UC 82.5%/CD 63.9%), passage of mucus with BM (UC 67.7%/CD 36.9%), passage of blood from the anus (UC 59.7%/CD 32.1%), and anxiety about distance from bathroom (UC 59%/CD 38.7%). The PCA analysis yielded a 4 symptom components solution for CD and UC. Conclusion The most common presenting symptoms in CD are fatigue and abdominal pain while in UC bloody BM and diarrhea are most common. Distinct symptom phenotypes are seen with PCA analysis. Our study demonstrates symptomatic similarities and differences between CD and UC and suggests that patients may also be classified by symptom phenotype at time of diagnosis.

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) therapy often requires biologic medications delivered by intravenous infusion.1-4 Historically, intravenous infusions of infliximab and vedolizumab in patients with IBD were delivered under direct supervision of clinicians in infusion centers at hospitals or clinics. Recently, intravenous infusions have transitioned into patient homes. Professional societies have differed on their recommendations for biologic home infusions (HI),5,6 yet limited data exist on the safety and efficacy of HI programs.7,8 Therefore, the primary aim of this study was to compare adverse outcomes (AOs), as defined as a composite of stopping therapy, IBD-related emergency-room (ER) visit, or IBD-related hospitalization, in patients with IBD receiving biologics as HI or at a hospital-based infusion center.

The aim of this study was to assess the relationship of serum vedolizumab concentrations (SVC) during induction and endoscopic remission in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) after 52 weeks of therapy with vedolizumab. We also sought to assess the incidence of antibody to vedolizumab (ATV) formation, the effect of ATV on drug pharmacokinetics and efficacy, and identify variables associated with SVC through the first 30 weeks of treatment. This is a prospective cohort study of patients with active IBD initiating standard therapy with vedolizumab. Collected variables included demographics, clinical disease activity, biomarkers, pre-infusion SVC, and ATV measured at weeks 2, 6, 14, 22, and 30. Primary outcome was steroid-free endoscopic remission at week 52. Fifty-five patients were included. Patients that achieved steroid-free endoscopic remission by week 52 had higher SVC at weeks 2, 6, 14, 22, and 30, but only achieved statistical significance at weeks 2 and 6. Only 3 out of the 55 study subjects (5.5%) had detectable ATV through the follow-up. Overall, there were a positive correlation between SVC and serum albumin and a negative correlation with C-reactive protein, fecal calprotectin, and body mass. Vedolizumab concentrations ≥ 23.2 mcg/ml at week 2 were associated with endoscopic remission at week 52 (OR 8.8 [95% CI 2.6–29.7], p

The armamentarium for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is growing with the introduction of new targeted therapies. Developing precision medicine approaches using our knowledge of IBD genetics is of great interest and importance. To date, research on genomic markers of drug response has largely focused on anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF) agents. Currently, no genetic markers have been validated for use in clinical practice to guide treatment selection. However, several studies have highlighted promising blood- and tissue-based markers of drug response. In this chapter, we provide an overview of the current evidence for genomic markers of response to biologics and discuss potential future directions for predictive biomarker discovery.

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a heterogeneous disease with patients experiencing varying disease courses and response to therapy. Developing precision medicine approaches is of great interest and importance to improve care for IBD patients. Recent advances have the potential to change the way clinicians stratify patients and then select the most appropriate treatment based on an individualized assessment of risk of complications and drug response. In this chapter, we provide concluding remarks on the current evidence and potential for genomics in IBD care and future directions to bring precision medicine approaches to the clinic.