Search

Background: Intensive treatment of multiple cardiovascular risk factors can halve mortality among people with established type 2 diabetes. We investigated the effect of early multifactorial treatment after diagnosis by screening., Methods: In a pragmatic, cluster-randomised, parallel-group trial done in Denmark, the Netherlands, and the UK, 343 general practices were randomly assigned screening of registered patients aged 40-69 years without known diabetes followed by routine care of diabetes or screening followed by intensive treatment of multiple risk factors. The primary endpoint was first cardiovascular event, including cardiovascular mortality and morbidity, revascularisation, and non-traumatic amputation within 5 years. Patients and staff assessing outcomes were unaware of the practice's study group assignment. Analysis was done by intention to treat. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00237549., Findings: Primary endpoint data were available for 3055 (99·9%) of 3057 screen-detected patients. The mean age was 60·3 (SD 6·9) years and the mean duration of follow-up was 5·3 (SD 1·6) years. Improvements in cardiovascular risk factors (HbA(1c) and cholesterol concentrations and blood pressure) were slightly but significantly better in the intensive treatment group. The incidence of first cardiovascular event was 7·2% (13·5 per 1000 person-years) in the intensive treatment group and 8·5% (15·9 per 1000 person-years) in the routine care group (hazard ratio 0·83, 95% CI 0·65-1·05), and of all-cause mortality 6·2% (11·6 per 1000 person-years) and 6·7% (12·5 per 1000 person-years; 0·91, 0·69-1·21), respectively., Interpretation: An intervention to promote early intensive management of patients with type 2 diabetes was associated with a small, non-significant reduction in the incidence of cardiovascular events and death., Funding: National Health Service Denmark, Danish Council for Strategic Research, Danish Research Foundation for General Practice, Danish Centre for Evaluation and Health Technology Assessment, Danish National Board of Health, Danish Medical Research Council, Aarhus University Research Foundation, Wellcome Trust, UK Medical Research Council, UK NIHR Health Technology Assessment Programme, UK National Health Service R&D, UK National Institute for Health Research, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center, Utrecht, Novo Nordisk, Astra, Pfizer, GlaxoSmithKline, Servier, HemoCue, Merck., (Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To assess opinions and their determinants of patients with type 2 diabetes about responsibility for managing their diabetes, setting treatment targets and willingness taking medication., Methods: Questionnaire survey carried out in general practices and outpatient clinics across the Netherlands., Outcomes: opinions about responsibility, targets and medication. Multinomial logistic regression analysis., Results: Data of 994 consecutive persons were analysed (mean age 65 years; 54% males). Of these 62% agreed to take responsibility for their diabetes. In the opinion of 89% the setting of targets should be by or in cooperation with their physician or nurse and 40% were willing to take tablets until all targets were attained. Patients who perceived dysfunction by barriers to activity did not agree to take responsibility (OR 3.68; 1.65-8.19). Patients with complications preferred to set targets in cooperation with their physician or nurse (OR 1.98; 1.03-3.80). Males were more willing to take tablets until all targets were attained (OR 1.62; 1.17-2.25)., Conclusion: Not all patients want to take responsibility for their diabetes or taking all necessary tablets, especially those with barriers to activity or complications., Practice Implications: Doctors and nurses should ask for patients' opinions about responsibility and treatment goals before starting education., (Copyright © 2010. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.)

Aim: To explore the knowledge, and health beliefs of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) regarding management of infections of the urinary tract (UTIs) and lower respiratory tract (LRTIs)., Methods: Three semi-structured focus groups with 23 patients with T2DM were conducted and analyzed., Results: Only a few patients mentioned specific preventive measures for UTIs and LRTIs, like not smoking and taking enough fluids (n=3). Making a nuisance of oneself, denying the seriousness of the disease and fear of insulin therapy were barriers to health-seeking behaviour. Some people did not complete the course of antibiotics (n=2) or forgot to take the tablets, especially when tablets had to be taken more than once a day (n=4)., Conclusion: Our results showed that patients with T2DM lack knowledge and realistic health beliefs about common infections such as UTIs and LRTIs. Health education should aim to help patients with T2DM to interpret symptoms of infections correctly in order to take the appropriate action such as taking preventive measures or taking antibiotics. Identifying patients at high risk of a complicated infection may target education towards those who need it most., (Copyright © 2010 Primary Care Diabetes Europe. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Aims/hypothesis: Treatment guidelines recommend the UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) risk engine for predicting cardiovascular risk in patients with type 2 diabetes, although validation studies showed moderate performance. The methods used in these validation studies were diverse, however, and sometimes insufficient. Hence, we assessed the discrimination and calibration of the UKPDS risk engine to predict 4, 5, 6 and 8 year cardiovascular risk in patients with type 2 diabetes., Methods: The cohort included 1,622 patients with type 2 diabetes. During a mean follow-up of 8 years, patients were followed for incidence of CHD and cardiovascular disease (CVD). Discrimination and calibration were assessed for 4, 5, 6 and 8 year risk. Discrimination was examined using the c-statistic and calibration by visually inspecting calibration plots and calculating the Hosmer-Lemeshow χ(2) statistic., Results: The UKPDS risk engine showed moderate to poor discrimination for both CHD and CVD (c-statistic of 0.66 for both 5 year CHD and CVD risks), and an overestimation of the risk (224% and 112%). The calibration of the UKPDS risk engine was slightly better for patients with type 2 diabetes who had been diagnosed with diabetes more than 10 years ago compared with patients diagnosed more recently, particularly for 4 and 5 year predicted CVD and CHD risks. Discrimination for these periods was still moderate to poor., Conclusions/interpretation: We observed that the UKPDS risk engine overestimates CHD and CVD risk. The discriminative ability of this model is moderate, irrespective of various subgroup analyses. To enhance the prediction of CVD in patients with type 2 diabetes, this model should be updated.

Aims/hypothesis: The aim of this study was to examine the effect of postprandial time on the associations and predictive value of non-fasting lipid levels and cardiovascular disease risk in participants with diabetes., Methods: This study was conducted among 1,337 participants with diabetes from the Dutch and German (Potsdam) contributions to the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition. At baseline, total cholesterol, LDL- and HDL-cholesterol and triacylglycerol concentrations were measured and the ratio of total cholesterol/HDL-cholesterol was calculated. Participants were followed for incidence of cardiovascular disease., Results: Lipid concentrations changed minimally with increasing postprandial time, except for triacylglycerol which was elevated just after a meal and declined over time (1.86 at 0.1 h to 1.33 at >6 h, p for trend <0.001). During a mean follow-up of 8 years, 116 cardiovascular events were documented. After adjustment for potential confounders, triacylglycerol (HR for third tertile compared with first tertile (HR(t)₃(to)₁), 1.73 [95% CI 1.04, 2.87]), HDL-cholesterol (HR(t)₃(to)₁, 0.41 [95% CI 0.23, 0.72]) and total cholesterol/HDL-cholesterol ratio (HR(t)₃(to)₁, 1.65 [95% CI 0.95, 2.85]) were associated with cardiovascular disease, independent of postprandial time. Cardiovascular disease risk prediction using the UK Prospective Diabetes Study risk engine was not affected by postprandial time., Conclusions/interpretation: Postprandial time did not affect associations between lipid concentrations and cardiovascular disease risk in patients with diabetes, nor did it influence prediction of cardiovascular disease. Therefore, it may not be necessary to use fasting blood samples to determine lipid concentrations for cardiovascular disease risk prediction in patients with diabetes.

Background: Women with diabetes have an increased risk of urinary tract infections (UTIs), especially recurrences. Aim. To investigate diabetes characteristics associated with the risk of recurrent lower UTIs and the antibiotic prescription pattern., Methods: In an exploratory retrospective study involving 7063 women aged>or=30 years, we studied the incidence of recurrent UTI (relapses and reinfection) in women with (n=340) and without diabetes (n=6618). Multivariable logistic regression and multilevel multinomial logistic analyses were used to determine the adjusted associations between diabetes characteristics and recurrent UTI [odds ratio (OR); 95% confidence interval (CI)] and the influence of diabetes on the pattern of antibiotic prescriptions for UTI, respectively., Results: Relapses and reinfections were reported in 7.1% and 15.9% of women with diabetes versus 2.0% and 4.1% of women without diabetes. There was an independent higher risk of recurrent UTI in women with diabetes compared with women without diabetes (OR 2.0; 95% CI 1.4-2.9). Women taking oral blood glucose-lowering medication (OR 2.1; 95% CI 1.2-3.5) or insulin (OR 3.0; 95% CI 1.7-5.1) or who had had diabetes for >or=5 years (OR 2.9; 95% CI 1.9-4.4) or who had retinopathy (OR 4.1; 95% CI 1.9-9.1) were at risk of recurrent UTI. The pattern of antibiotic prescriptions for UTI was not influenced by diabetes., Conclusions: Women with diabetes>or=5 years or with glucose-lowering medication or with retinopathy have an increased risk of recurrent UTI. Diabetes itself does not seem to influence the antibiotic prescription pattern. Research focusing on effective antibiotic treatment of UTI in women at risk of recurrence is needed and may help limit the development of antibiotic resistance.

Background: Scientific evidence for the frequency of monitoring of type 2 diabetes patients is lacking. If three-monthly control in general practice could be reduced to six-monthly control in some patients, this would on the one hand reduce the use of medical services including involvement of practice nurses, and thus reduce costs, and on the other hand alleviate the burden of people with type 2 diabetes. The goal of this study is to make primary diabetes care as efficient as possible for patients and health care providers. Therefore, we want to determine whether six-monthly monitoring of well-controlled type 2 diabetes patients in primary care leads to equivalent cardiometabolic control compared to the generally recommended three-monthly monitoring., Methods and Design: The study is a randomised controlled patient-preference equivalence trial. Participants are asked if they prefer three-monthly (usual care) or six-monthly diabetes monitoring. If they do not have a preference, they are randomised to a three-monthly or six-monthly monitoring group. Patients are eligible for the study if they are between 40 and 80 years old, diagnosed with type 2 diabetes more than one year ago, treated by a general practitioner, not on insulin treatment, and with HbA1c < or = 7.5%, systolic blood pressure < or = 145 mmHg and total cholesterol < or = 5.2 mmol/l. The intervention group (six-monthly monitoring) will receive the same treatment with the same treatment targets as the control group (three-monthly monitoring). The intervention period will last one and a half year. After the intervention, the three-monthly and six-monthly monitoring groups are compared on equivalence of cardiometabolic control. Secondary outcome measures are HbA1c, blood pressure, cholesterol level, Body Mass Index, smoking behaviour, physical activity, loss of work due to illness, health status, diabetes-specific distress, satisfaction with treatment and adherence to medications. We will use intention-to-treat analysis with repeated measures. For outcomes that have only baseline and final measurements, we will use ANCOVA. Depending on the results, a cost-minimisation analysis or an incremental cost-effectiveness analysis will be done., Discussion: This study will provide valuable information on the most efficient control frequency of well-controlled type 2 diabetes patients in primary care.

Purpose: To examine the effects of a multi-factorial, intensified treatment on self-reported health status, treatment satisfaction, and diabetes-related distress in screen-detected type 2 diabetes patients., Methods: Cluster-randomised controlled trial; A total of 498 screen-detected type 2 diabetes patients from 79 general practices were assigned to intensified (n = 255) or routine treatment according to Dutch guidelines (n = 243). At baseline and after 3 years, patients completed the Short Form-36 and the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions questionnaires. After 4.5 years, patients completed the Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire and the Problem Areas In Diabetes scale. We analysed the effects of intensified treatment on self-rated health status, treatment satisfaction, and diabetes-related distress, using random effects models to account for clustering at practice level., Results: Three to 5 years after type 2 diabetes was detected by screening, there were no differences between intensified and routine treatment in self-reported health status, treatment satisfaction, and diabetes-related distress., Conclusions: Multi-factorial, intensified treatment did not influence self-rated health status, treatment satisfaction, and distress in screen-detected type 2 diabetes patients. Therefore, health care professionals do not have to fear negative effects of an intensified treatment on these psychological outcomes.

Background: It is not known whether drugs that block the renin-angiotensin system reduce the risk of diabetes and cardiovascular events in patients with impaired glucose tolerance., Methods: In this double-blind, randomized clinical trial with a 2-by-2 factorial design, we assigned 9306 patients with impaired glucose tolerance and established cardiovascular disease or cardiovascular risk factors to receive valsartan (up to 160 mg daily) or placebo (and nateglinide or placebo) in addition to lifestyle modification. We then followed the patients for a median of 5.0 years for the development of diabetes (6.5 years for vital status). We studied the effects of valsartan on the occurrence of three coprimary outcomes: the development of diabetes; an extended composite outcome of death from cardiovascular causes, nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, hospitalization for heart failure, arterial revascularization, or hospitalization for unstable angina; and a core composite outcome that excluded unstable angina and revascularization., Results: The cumulative incidence of diabetes was 33.1% in the valsartan group, as compared with 36.8% in the placebo group (hazard ratio in the valsartan group, 0.86; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.80 to 0.92; P<0.001). Valsartan, as compared with placebo, did not significantly reduce the incidence of either the extended cardiovascular outcome (14.5% vs. 14.8%; hazard ratio, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.86 to 1.07; P=0.43) or the core cardiovascular outcome (8.1% vs. 8.1%; hazard ratio, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.86 to 1.14; P=0.85)., Conclusions: Among patients with impaired glucose tolerance and cardiovascular disease or risk factors, the use of valsartan for 5 years, along with lifestyle modification, led to a relative reduction of 14% in the incidence of diabetes but did not reduce the rate of cardiovascular events. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00097786.), (2010 Massachusetts Medical Society)

Background: The ability of short-acting insulin secretagogues to reduce the risk of diabetes or cardiovascular events in people with impaired glucose tolerance is unknown., Methods: In a double-blind, randomized clinical trial, we assigned 9306 participants with impaired glucose tolerance and either cardiovascular disease or cardiovascular risk factors to receive nateglinide (up to 60 mg three times daily) or placebo, in a 2-by-2 factorial design with valsartan or placebo, in addition to participation in a lifestyle modification program. We followed the participants for a median of 5.0 years for incident diabetes (and a median of 6.5 years for vital status). We evaluated the effect of nateglinide on the occurrence of three coprimary outcomes: the development of diabetes; a core cardiovascular outcome that was a composite of death from cardiovascular causes, nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, or hospitalization for heart failure; and an extended cardiovascular outcome that was a composite of the individual components of the core composite cardiovascular outcome, hospitalization for unstable angina, or arterial revascularization., Results: After adjustment for multiple testing, nateglinide, as compared with placebo, did not significantly reduce the cumulative incidence of diabetes (36% and 34%, respectively; hazard ratio, 1.07; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.00 to 1.15; P=0.05), the core composite cardiovascular outcome (7.9% and 8.3%, respectively; hazard ratio, 0.94, 95% CI, 0.82 to 1.09; P=0.43), or the extended composite cardiovascular outcome (14.2% and 15.2%, respectively; hazard ratio, 0.93, 95% CI, 0.83 to 1.03; P=0.16). Nateglinide did, however, increase the risk of hypoglycemia., Conclusions: Among persons with impaired glucose tolerance and established cardiovascular disease or cardiovascular risk factors, assignment to nateglinide for 5 years did not reduce the incidence of diabetes or the coprimary composite cardiovascular outcomes. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00097786.), (2010 Massachusetts Medical Society)

Aims: The Diabetes Care Protocol (DCP) combines task delegation, intensification of diabetes treatment and feedback. It reduces cardiovascular risk in Type 2 diabetes (T2DM) patients. This study determines the effects of DCP on patient-important outcomes., Methods: A cluster randomized, non-inferiority trial, by self-administered questionnaires in 55 Dutch primary care practices: 26 practices DCP (1699 patients), 26 usual care (1692 patients). T2DM patients treated by their general practitioner were included. Main outcome was the 1-year between-group difference in Diabetes Health Profile (DHP-18) total score., Secondary Outcomes: DHP-18 subscales, general perceived health [Medical Outcomes Study 36-Items Short Form Health Survey (SF-36), Euroqol 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) and Euroqol visual analogue scale (EQ-VAS)], treatment satisfaction (Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire; DTSQ status) and psychosocial self-efficacy (Diabetes Empowerment Scale Short Form; DES-SF). Per protocol (PP) and intention-to-treat (ITT) analyses were performed: non-inferiority margin Delta=-2%. At baseline 2333 questionnaires were returned and 1437 1 year thereafter., Results: Comparing DCP with usual care, DHP-18 total score was non-inferior: PP -0.88 (95% CI -1.94 to 0.12), ITT -0.439 (95% CI -1.01 to 0.08), SF-36 'health change' improved: PP 3.51 (95% CI 1.23 to 5.82), ITT 1.91 (95% CI 0.62 to 3.23), SF-36 'social functioning' was inconclusive: PP-1.57 (95% CI-4.3 to 0.72), ITT-1.031 (95% CI-2.52 to -0.25). Other DHP and SF-36 scores were inconsistent or non-inferior. DHP-18 'disinhibited eating' was significantly worse in PP analyses. For EQ-5D/EQ-VAS, DTSQ and DES-SF, no significant between-group differences were found., Conclusion: DCP does not seem to influence health status negatively, therefore diabetes care providers should not shrink from intensified treatment. However, they should take possible detrimental effects on 'social functioning' and 'disinhibited eating' into account.

Background: European studies on quality of diabetes care in an unselected primary care diabetes population are scarce., Research Question: To test the feasibility of the set-up and logistics of a cross-sectional EUropean study on Care and Complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) in Primary Care (EUCCLID) in 12 European countries., Method: One rural and one urban practice from each country participated. The central coordinating centre randomly selected five patients from each practice. Patient characteristics were assessed including medical history, anthropometric measures, quality indicators, UKPDS-risk engine, psychological and general well-being., Results: We included 103 participants from 22 GPs in 11 countries. Central data and laboratory samples were successfully collected. Of the participants 54% were female, mean age was 66 years and mean duration of diabetes was 9.6 years. Besides, 18% were using insulin, 31% had a history of cardiovascular disease, mean HbA1c was 7.1% (range 6.6-8.0), mean systolic blood pressure was 133.7 mmHg (range 126.1-144.4) and mean total cholesterol was 4.9 mmol/l (range 4.0-6.2)., Conclusion: A European study on care and complications in a random selection of people with T2DM is feasible. There are large differences in indicators of metabolic control and wellbeing between countries., ((c) 2010 Primary Care Diabetes Europe. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Objective: The Diabetes Care Protocol (DCP), a multifaceted computerized decision support diabetes management intervention, reduces cardiovascular risk of type 2 diabetic patients. We performed a cost-effectiveness analysis of DCP from a Dutch health care perspective., Research Design and Methods: A cluster randomized trial provided data of DCP versus usual care. The 1-year follow-up patient data were extrapolated using a modified Dutch microsimulation diabetes model, computing individual lifetime health-related costs, and health effects. Incremental costs and effectiveness (quality-adjusted life-years [QALYs]) were estimated using multivariate generalized estimating equations to correct for practice-level clustering and confounding. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were calculated and cost-effectiveness acceptability curves were created. Stroke costs were calculated separately. Subgroup analyses examined patients with and without cardiovascular disease (CVD+ or CVD- patients, respectively)., Results: Excluding stroke, DCP patients lived longer (0.14 life-years, P = NS), experienced more QALYs (0.037, P = NS), and incurred higher total costs (euro 1,415, P = NS), resulting in an ICER of euro 38,243 per QALY gained. The likelihood of cost-effectiveness given a willingness-to-pay threshold of euro 20,000 per QALY gained is 30%. DCP had a more favorable effect on CVD+ patients (ICER = euro 14,814) than for CVD- patients (ICER = euro 121,285). Coronary heart disease costs were reduced (euro-587, P < 0.05)., Conclusions: DCP reduces cardiovascular risk, resulting in only a slight improvement in QALYs, lower CVD costs, but higher total costs, with a high cost-effectiveness ratio. Cost-effective care can be achieved by focusing on cardiovascular risk factors in type 2 diabetic patients with a history of CVD.

Methods: The most recent nationally recognised guidelines for type 2 diabetes from eight European countries (Belgium, England/Wales, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, the Netherlands and Sweden) were compared. The Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) instrument was used for quality assessment. Details of recommendations for key process and outcome indicators were also extracted. Appraisal and data extraction were conducted independently by two researchers., Results: AGREE domain scores varied between guidelines, including a range of 31-95% for rigour of development. The highest mean domain scores were for Scope and Purpose (81%) and Clarity and Presentation (85%); the lowest was for Stakeholder Involvement (49%). Specific recommendations, including targets relating to intermediate outcomes, were broadly similar. However, at detailed level, there were variations, particularly in terms of the level of information provided, for example, only two countries' guidelines provided cut-off points in relation to risk associated with waist circumference., Implications: Our findings suggest that there are some areas of good practice relating to guideline development where more attention is needed. Despite a substantial degree of consensus for specified targets, observed differences at detailed level suggest a lack of consistency in relation to some aspects of the information provided to clinicians across Europe., (2009 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Determination of both the feasibility and the result in terms of cardiovascular risk factors of self-measurement of waist circumference by apparently healthy people. We also investigated the prevalence of metabolic syndrome in a population of patients aged 20-69 years in IJsselstein, the Netherlands., Design: Cross-sectional survey., Methods: All patients aged 20-69 years in the care of a group of General Practitioners (GPs) in IJsselstein, the Netherlands, who were not known to have diabetes, hypertension or dyslipidaemia (n = 11,862), received a tape measure and instructions by mail with the request to measure their waist circumference. Those with an increased waist circumference (> 88 and > 102 cm for women and men, respectively) were invited to undergo investigations to determine whether they conformed to the NCEP ATP III criteria for metabolic syndrome. The prevalence of metabolic syndrome was determined by a combination of these results with file studies of those with already known risk factors for cardiac and vascular disease., Results: The total response rate was 62%. The intraclass correlation between the waist circumference measured by the respondents and by the investigators was 0.80 (p < 0.05). 473 new cases of metabolic syndrome were detected among 1721 persons with an increased waist circumference on self-measurement, 40 % in people younger than 45 years. The total prevalence among those aged 20-69 years in IJsselstein was 15.5%. Only 39% of the people with the metabolic syndrome were already known to have risk factors., Conclusions: A GP initiated screening system for metabolic syndrome, in which self-measurement of waist circumference was the first step, proved to be feasible and reliable. A substantial group of people aged less than 45 years and at increased cardiovascular risk were also detected using this method of population screening.

Objective: To assess the preferences of patients with Type 2 diabetes regarding self-care activities and diabetes education., Research Design and Methods: Questionnaire survey carried out in general practices and outpatient clinics across the Netherlands., Outcomes: preferred setting for education, preferred educator, and preferred and most burdensome self-care activity. Multinomial logistic regression analysis assessed associations between outcomes and patient characteristics, preferences and opinions., Results: Data of 994 consecutive individuals were analysed (mean 65 years; 54% male; 97% Caucasian; 21% low education level; 80% primary care). Of these, 19% thought they had poor to average glycaemic control, 61% thought they were over-weight and 32% thought they took too little exercise. Eighty per cent of respondents preferred diabetes education during regular diabetes check-ups. Patients taking insulin preferred education to be given by nurses [odds ratio (OR) 2.45; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.21-4.96]. Individuals who thought their health to be poor/average preferred education to be given by doctors (OR 1.65; 95% CI 1.08-2.53). Physical exercise was the preferred self-care activity of those who thought they took too little exercise (OR 1.97; 95% CI 1.32-2.93) but was preferred less by patients with mobility problems (OR 0.65; 95% CI 0.43-0.97). Patients with eating disinhibition reported keeping to a healthy diet (OR 4.63; 3.00-7.16) and taking medication (OR 1.66; 95% CI 1.09-2.52) as the most burdensome self-care activities. Age was not an independent determinant of any preference., Conclusions: When providing education for patients with newly diagnosed Type 2 diabetes, healthcare providers should consider making a tailored education plan, irrespective of the patient's age.

Objective: To assess changes in incidence and in antibiotic prescription rates for infections of the lower respiratory tract (LRTI) and urinary tract (UTI) in patients with diabetes (DM) over the years 1995 to 2003., Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study as part of the University Medical Center Utrecht General Practitioners Research Network. We included patients with DM aged > or = 45 years. We assessed incidence and antibiotic prescription rates for LRTI and UTI. Incidence rates were calculated as episodes per 1000 person-years. Antibiotic prescription rates were calculated per 100 episodes of LRTI and UTI., Results: The study population increased over the years 1995 to 2003. The male-to-female ratio and mean age of the study population remained constant over these years. The incidence rate for LRTI remained stable (13%; p=0.442), and for UTI the incidence rate increased by 40% (p=0.037). Antibiotic prescription rates increased in LRTI by 60% (p<0.001) and in cystitis by 15% (p=0.029)., Conclusions: Incidence rates for UTI and antibiotic prescription rates for LRTI in diabetes have increased over the years 1995 to 2003. In particular, attention should be paid to the increasing use of antibiotics in DM patients with LRTI.

Background and Aims: Non-adherence is considered a major barrier to better outcomes of diabetes care. A relationship has been established between polypharmacy and patients' adherence. This study aims to investigate the occurrence of polypharmacy and non-adherence in general practice, their mutual relationship and the association between adherence and the intermediate outcomes of diabetes care., Materials and Methods: We used the baseline and follow-up data of a randomised controlled trial (RCT) that compared usual care with care in accordance with a locally adapted national guideline. This study took place in the Netherlands and involved 30 general practices and 1283 patients. We obtained a complete medication profile of all participants and calculated the number of prescribed drugs and the adherence indices (AI) for oral blood glucose, blood pressure and cholesterol lowering drugs. Patients with an adherence index < 0.8 were considered non-adherent. Clustering at practice level and case-mix were taken into account., Results: Approximately 80% of the participating patients demonstrated an adherence index >or= 0.8 for oral blood glucose, blood pressure and cholesterol lowering drugs. In the intervention group, increase of drug prescriptions exceeded that of controls (1.1 +/- 2.0 vs. 0.6 +/- 1.5, p < 0.001, adjusted p < 0.05). There was evidence of an inverse relationship between the number of drugs that had been prescribed during the last 6 months of the study and patients' adherence to blood pressure lowering medications (adjusted OR 0.84, 95%CI 0.78-0.91). After one year, HbA1c and total cholesterol levels were significantly lower in adherent patients., Conclusion: During the intervention the mean number of drug prescriptions increased in both the study groups. This did not result in a lower adherence to blood glucose and cholesterol lowering medications. Given the relationship between the number of medications and patients' adherence to blood pressure lowering drugs, it may be wise to discuss adherence before prescribing multiple drug regimens., ((c) 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.)

Objective: The main objective is to examine the effect of the introduction of a practice nurse (PN) on the quality of type 2 diabetes care., Methods: Retrospective cohort study in 397 type 2 diabetes patients recruited from five general practices in the Netherlands. Measurements were performed in 2003, 2005 and 2007, to estimate the effects before (2003) and after the introduction of the PN (2005) as well as the changed diabetes guidelines (2007). Process measures indicated whether measurements of HbA(1c), systolic blood pressure, lipid profile, funduscopy, foot examination and annual check-ups were carried out. Outcome measures comprised actual levels of HbA(1c), systolic blood pressure, lipid levels and BMI., Results: All process measures - except performance of funduscopy - improved significantly. Mean HbA(1c) decreased from 6.8% to 6.5% (2003-2007: ns, 2005-2007: p<0.01), mean LDL-cholesterol from 3.2 to 2.7 mmol/L (p<0.0001) and mean total cholesterol/HDL-cholesterol ratio from 4.5 to 3.7 (p<0.0001). For systolic blood pressure, the number of patients reaching targets increased considerably in 2007. Analyses for both study populations at different time points as well as for patients present at all time points showed comparable results., Conclusions: Delegating diabetes care to a PN leads to significant improvements in diabetes care. General practitioners should seriously consider close collaboration with PNs to delegate diabetes care tasks.

Objective: Type 2 diabetes is known to be associated with decrements in memory and executive functions and information-processing speed. It is less clear, however, at which stage of diabetes these cognitive decrements develop and how they progress over time. In this study, we investigated cognitive functioning of patients with recent screen-detected type 2 diabetes, thus providing insight into the nature and severity of cognitive decrements in the early stage of the disease. Possible risk factors were also addressed., Research Design and Methods: Included in this study were 183 diabetic patients from a previously established study cohort and 69 control subjects. A full neuropsychological assessment, addressing six cognitive domains, was made for each participant. Raw test scores were standardized into z scores per domain and compared between the groups. Possible risk factors for cognitive decrements were examined with multivariate linear regression., Results: Relative to scores for the control group, mean z scores were between 0.01 and 0.2 lower in the diabetic group across all domains, but after adjustment for differences in IQ between patients and control subjects, only memory performance was significantly reduced (mean difference -0.15 [95% CI -0.28 to -0.03]). A history of macrovascular disease and current smoking were significant determinants of slower information-processing speed in patients with diabetes., Conclusions: This study shows that modest cognitive decrements are already present at the early stage of type 2 diabetes. A history of macrovascular disease and smoking are significant risk factors for some early decrements.

Aim: To systematically review the literature regarding insulin use in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, Methods: A Medline and Embase search was performed to identify randomized controlled trials (RCT) published in English between 1 January 2000 and 1 April 2008, involving insulin therapy in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus. The RCTs must comprise at least glycaemic control (glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c), postprandial plasma glucose and /or fasting blood glucose (FBG)) and hypoglycaemic events as outcome measurements., Results: The Pubmed search resulted in 943 hits; the Embase search gave 692 hits. A total of 116 RCTs were selected by title or abstract. Eventually 78 trials met the inclusion criteria. The studies were very diverse and of different quality. They comprised all possible insulin regimens with and without combination with oral medication. Continuing metformin and/or sulphonylurea after start of therapy with basal long-acting insulin results in better glycaemic control with less insulin requirements, less weight gain and less hypoglycaemic events. Long-acting insulin analogues in combination with oral medication are associated with similar glycaemic control but fewer hypoglycaemic episodes compared with NPH insulin. Most of the trials demonstrated better glycaemic control with premix insulin therapy than with a long-acting insulin once daily, but premix insulin causes more hypoglycaemic episodes. Analogue premix provides similar HbA1c, but lower postprandial glucose levels compared with human premix, without increase in hypoglycaemic events or weight gain. Drawing conclusions from the limited number of studies concerning basal-bolus regimen seems not possible. Some studies showed that rapid-acting insulin analogues frequently result in a better HbA1c or postprandial glucose without increase of hypoglycaemia than regular human insulin., Conclusion: A once-daily basal insulin regimen added to oral medication is an ideal starting point. All next steps, from one to two or even more injections per day should be taken very carefully and in thorough deliberation with the patient, who has to comply with such a regimen for many years.

Aims: To compare the feasibility experienced by patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in a self-management educational program to the hindrance assessed by the educator of the program., Methods: Twenty-five type 2 diabetes patients on maximally tolerated oral hypoglycaemic agents followed a 6-month educational program consisting of five components: background, medication, physical exercise, nutrition and blood glucose self-monitoring. Medication was unchanged during the study. Outcome measures were feasibility encountered by the patient, hindrance observed by the educator and HbA(1c)-level., Results: The feasibility encountered by patients was significantly related to the hindrance assessed by the educators (rho 0.756, p<0.001). Feasibility increased significantly for three components but not for physical exercise and nutritional advice. Mean HbA(1c)-level decreased from 8.2+/-1.1% before onset of the program to 7.2+/-1.3% 6 weeks after termination of the program., Conclusions: Feasibility experienced by the patients matched the hindrance noticed by the educators. This might have led to an increase in patients' self-efficacy, which in turn gives an improvement in self-management and glycaemic control.

Aims: Erectile dysfunction (ED) prevalence is usually based on questionnaires, too elaborate for daily practice. The single question for ED prevalence is unknown. Literature reports an independent association between ED and both cardiovascular disease (CVD) and diabetes. Whether routinely asking men with Type 2 diabetes (DM2) about ED identifies those at elevated risk for CVD is unknown. We assessed cardiovascular risk of DM2 men with ED., Design and Methods: This was a cross-sectional study in primary care. During annual check-up, the practice nurse asked 1823 DM2 men: "Do you have erection problems? Yes/no." ED prevalence rate was calculated. Age, medication, and other known factors associated with ED and/or CVD were used in univariate analysis (odds ratio [OR], Student's t test, and Mann-Whitney test). This revealed confounding variables used in the multivariable analysis. The association between ED and history of cardiovascular disease (HCVD) was assessed by logistic regression analysis. In patients with no HCVD, we assessed the association between ED and 10-year United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) coronary heart disease risk by linear regression analysis., Results: The prevalence of ED in DM2 patients was 41.3%. There was no independent association between ED and HCVD [adjusted OR, 1.2 (95% CI, 0.9-1.5)]. The 10-year UKPDS CHD risk difference between men with and without ED was 5.9% (95% CI, 3.2-8.7), but after adjustment for age, this association disappeared [adjusted risk difference, 0.6% (95% CI, -1.5 to 2.7)]., Conclusion: The ED prevalence rate assessed by a single question was comparable to that assessed by questionnaires. ED neither did independently relate to patients' cardiovascular history nor to cardiovascular risk.

Objectives: To determine the feasibility of population-based screening for metabolic syndrome (MetS) in primary care with self-measurement of waist circumference (WC) as first step, and the prevalence of MetS in a Dutch city., Methods: A survey of 14,000 people on the list of primary care physicians in the city of IJsselstein. All adults between 20 and 70 years on July 1st, 2006 were asked to measure their WC using a mailed tape measure. Participants with a high WC (>88/102 cm for women/men) were invited for assessment of other factors defining MetS. For patients already known with cardiovascular risk factors, these data were collected from medical records., Results: 11,862 subjects were invited, of whom 6843 (58%) measured their WC. 2004 had a WC>88/102 cm and 1721 participated in all examinations. In 473 MetS was detected. The sensitivity of the screening was 77%, the negative predictive value 96%. The prevalence of MetS, including patients known with cardiovascular risk factors, was 15.5%., Conclusions: A primary care physician-driven population screening with self-measurement of WC can identify adults with MetS. The estimated prevalence of MetS is 15.5%. This procedure creates possibilities for targeted screening, prevention and treatment of people who are at increased cardiovascular risk.

We aimed to develop a prediction rule for urinary tract infections (UTIs) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM2). A 12-month prospective cohort study was conducted in patients with DM2 aged > or = 45 years to predict the occurrence of recurrent UTIs in women and lower UTIs in men. Predictors for recurrent UTI in women (n=81, 2%) and lower UTIs in men (n=93, 3%) were age, number of general practitioner (GP) visits, urinary incontinence, cerebrovascular disease or dementia. In women, renal disease was an additional predictor. The optimism [corrected] corrected area under the receiver-operating curve (AUC) was 0.79 (95% CI 0.74-0.83) for women and 0.75 (95% CI 0.70-0.80) for men. Using a cut-off score of 4, women with a lower risk assignment had a probability of 0.3% for the outcome. For a cut-off score of 6, women with a higher risk assignment had a probability of 5.8%. For men these figures were 0.8 and 7.1 for a cut-off score of 2 and 4, respectively. Simple variables can be used for the risk stratification of patients.

Aim: Because Dutch health care organisations did want to establish well-defined diabetes shared care groups, we investigated the organisation of insulin therapy in general practice in the Netherlands and assessed factors that were associated with providing insulin therapy in type 2 diabetes (DM2) patients., Methods: Questionnaire to half of the Dutch general practitioners (GPs) (n=3848). We compared GPs who both start insulin treatment and monitor the dosages with those who always refer patients requiring insulin therapy or only monitor insulin dosages., Results: Total response was 42% (n=1621). 67% of the GPs start insulin therapy in patients with DM2, especially male GPs and those above the age of 40, as well as GPs working in a health centre and those working together with a practice nurse. GPs working in urban regions less often start insulin. The most often mentioned barriers for starting and/or monitoring insulin therapy are lack of knowledge of insulin therapy, lack of time and insufficient financial incentives., Conclusion: This nation-wide overview shows that insulin therapy is no longer a secondary care based activity. However, there is still need to enlarge the practice staff and to overcome the perceived skills deficit.

Background: A growing body of evidence suggests that earlier diagnosis and treatment of diabetes may be beneficial; however, definitive evidence is lacking., Aim: To evaluate the effectiveness of an intensified multifactorial treatment on cardiovascular risk factors in patients with screen-detected type 2 diabetes., Design of Study: Randomised controlled trial., Setting: Seventy-nine general practices in the southwestern region of the Netherlands., Method: In this randomised trial, patients diagnosed with diabetes by screen-detection were assigned to intensified (n = 255) or routine treatment (n = 243), and followed over 1 year. Intensified treatment consisted of pharmacological treatment combined with lifestyle education to achieve haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) <7.0%, blood pressure <135/85 mmHg, and cholesterol <5.0 mmol/l (4.5 mmol/l if cardiovascular disease was present). Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) was assessed using the Short Form (SF)-36. Analyses were performed using generalised estimating equations models., Results: Changes in body mass index were 0.2 (routine care) versus -1.4 kg/m(2) (intensified treatment), P<0.001; systolic blood pressure -19 versus -33 mmHg, P<0.001; diastolic blood pressure -7 versus -12 mmHg, P<0.001; HbA1c -0.9% versus -1.1%, P = 0.03; cholesterol -0.5 versus -1.2 mmol/l, P<0.001; high-density lipoprotein cholesterol 0.1 versus 0.1 mmol/l, P = 0.26; low-density lipoprotein cholesterol -0.5 versus -1.0 mmol/l, P<0.001; triglycerides -0.3 versus -0.4 mmol/l, P = 0.71. No difference in HRQoL between the two groups was reported., Conclusion: Intensified multifactorial treatment of patients with screen-detected diabetes in general practice reduces cardiovascular risk factor levels significantly without worsening HRQoL.

Background: People with non-diabetic hyperglycaemia might be at risk of lacking adequate control for cardiovascular risk factors. Our aim was to determine the extent of health care utilization and provision in primary care and to evaluate the risk of cardiovascular disease in persons with an elevated risk score in a stepwise diabetes screening programme., Methods: A total of 56,978 non-diabetic patients, aged 50-70 years, from 79 practices in the Netherlands were invited to participate in a screening programme starting with a questionnaire. Those with an elevated score, underwent further glucose testing. Screened participants with type 2 diabetes (n = 64), impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) (n = 62), impaired fasting glucose (IFG) (n = 86), and normal glucose tolerance (NGT) (n = 142) were compared after three years regarding use of medication, care provider encounters and occurrence of CVD., Results: In all glucose regulation categories cardiovascular medication was prescribed more frequently during follow-up with the strongest increase in diabetic patients. Number of practice visits was higher in diabetic patients compared to those in the other categories. Glucose, lipids, and blood pressure were measured most frequently in diabetic patients. Numbers of cardiovascular events in participants with NGT, IFG, IGT and diabetes were 16.7, 32.6, 17.3 and 15.7 per 1,000 person-years (non significant), respectively., Conclusion: After three years of follow-up, screened non-diabetic participants with an elevated risk score had cardiovascular event rates comparable with diabetic patients. Screened non-diabetic persons are at risk of lacking optimal control for cardiovascular risk factors while screen-detected diabetic patients were controlled adequately.

Objective: To assess the effects of a facilitator enhanced multifaceted intervention to implement a locally adapted guideline on the shared care for people with type 2 diabetes., Methods: During 1 year a cluster-randomized trial was performed in 30 general practices. In the intervention group, nurse facilitators enhanced guideline implementation by analysing barriers to change, introducing structured care, training practice staff and giving performance feedback. Targets for HbA1c%, systolic blood pressure as well as indications for angiotensin converting enzyme/angiotensin receptor blocking agent prescription differed from the national guidelines. In the control group, GPs were asked to continue the care for people with diabetes as usually. Generalized estimating equations were used to control for the clustered design of the study., Results: In the intervention group, more people were seen on a 3-monthly basis (88% versus 69%, P < 0.001) and more blood pressure and bodyweight measurements were performed every 3 months (blood pressure 83% versus 66%, P < 0.001 and bodyweight 78.9% versus 48.5%, P < 0.001). Apart from a marginal difference in mean cholesterol, differences in HbA1c%, blood pressure, body mass index and treatment satisfaction were not significant., Conclusion: Multifaceted implementation of locally adapted shared care guidelines did improve the process of diabetes care but hardly changed intermediate outcomes. In the short term, local adaptation of shared care guidelines does not improve the cardiovascular risks of people with type 2 diabetes.

Objective: The Diabetes Care Protocol combines task delegation (a practice nurse), computerized decision support, and feedback every 3 months. We studied the effect of the Diabetes Care Protocol on A1C and cardiovascular risk factors in type 2 diabetic patients in primary care., Research Design and Methods: In a cluster randomized trial, mean changes in cardiovascular risk factors between the intervention and control groups after 1 year were calculated by generalized linear models., Results: Throughout the Netherlands, 26 intervention practices included 1,699 patients and 29 control practices 1,692 patients. The difference in A1C change was not significant, whereas total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, and blood pressure improved significantly more in the intervention group. The 10-year coronary heart disease risk estimate of the UK Prospective Diabetes Study improved 1.4% more in the intervention group., Conclusions: Delegation of routine diabetes care to a practice nurse combined with computerized decision support and feedback did not improve A1C but reduced cardiovascular risk in type 2 diabetes patients.

Over the past 20 years, delivery ofdiabetes care in the Netherlands has shifted from secondary to primary care. Currently over 75% of all patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus are being treated by a diabetes team in general practice. Since 2000 both national and international publications have been describing the organisation and quality of primary diabetes care in the Netherlands. Apart from 4 large-scale diabetes projects in the areas of Zwolle, Hoorn, Maastricht and Breda, primary diabetes care is organised in various ways. At the end of 2005 a questionnaire sent to a representative group of 1621 general practitioners revealed that 95% kept a computerised diabetes register, one out of three practices delegated tasks to a diabetes service, and 20% of the practices had a shared care protocol with specialists. 2 out of 3 practices ran a diabetes clinic in which 2 out of 3 a practice nurse was involved. The results of 9 projects are known. 3 projects concern cross-sectional findings of disease management organisations, 6 concern general practices which were not participating in a diabetes project at the time of measurement, and 2 are clinical trials. Most of these measurements yielded representative data. They show that mean HbA(1C) levels < 7%, mean systolic blood pressure of about 143 mmHg, and mean cholesterol levels of about 4.5 mmol/l are achievable. With logistic support, regular check-ups of fundus and feet are achieved in 9 out of 10 patients. No special organisational model has proved to be superior. A correct assessment of quality of care indicators should take into account the heterogeneity of type 2 diabetes mellitus, as well as the socio-economic status and the ethnicity of the patient population.

Aims: To investigate if patients' perceptions of their diabetes status is related to blood glucose self-monitoring (SMBG) behaviour, independent of self-reported disease severity., Methods: The setting of this study was a cross-sectional study among 1561 patients, 18 years or older, who filled at least two prescriptions for any glucose lowering drug between March 2002 and 2003 in the Netherlands. Using a 30-item self-administered questionnaire, data on self-monitoring behaviour (frequency of test strip use and objective of self-monitoring), perceived diabetes status and disease severity were gathered. Type 1 diabetes mellitus patients were excluded. We used logistic regression to calculate odds ratios (OR) and their 95% confidence intervals (CI)., Results: About 54% of the patients (n=841) returned evaluable questionnaires. After exclusion of 97 type 1 diabetes mellitus patients, 744 type 2 diabetes mellitus patients were included. Practising SMBG was more common among patients who rated their diabetes status as poorly or moderately controlled compared to those who rated it (very) well-controlled (OR 1.93; 95% CI: 1.20-3.12). A better perceived diabetes status was more likely in those who performed SMBG infrequently compared to those who performed SMBG frequently (p-value for trend=0.001). Self-reported factors of disease severity and personalized objectives did not affect these associations considerably., Conclusions: Among type 2 diabetes mellitus patients, SMBG behaviour is associated with patients' perceptions of diabetes status, irrespective of the self-reported disease severity.

Diabetes mellitus is associated with end-organ complications in the peripheral and central nervous system. It is unknown if these complications share a common aetiology, and if they co-occur in the same patient. The aim of the present study was to relate different measures of peripheral neuropathy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM2) to cognition and brain MRI. A standardized neurological examination and questionnaire, neuropsychological examination and brain MRI were performed in 122 patients with DM2 and 56 matched controls. Measures of peripheral neuropathy were vibration threshold, a sensory examination sum score and the Toronto Clinical Neuropathy Scoring System. Neuropsychological test scores were expressed in standardized z-values across five predetermined cognitive domains. White matter lesions and cortical and subcortical atrophy were rated on MRI. Overall 38% of the patients with DM2 and 12% of the controls were classified as having any neuropathy (p<0.001). Patients with DM2 had a lower performance on the neuropsychological tests, more white matter lesions (p<0.01) and more atrophy (p<0.01) than controls. Within the DM2 group none of the measures of peripheral neuropathy was related to MRI abnormalities or cognitive dysfunction (linear regression analyses, adjusted for age, education, sex). We conclude that peripheral neuropathy in patients with DM2 is not related to cognitive dysfunction and brain abnormalities. This indicates that central and peripheral neurological complications of DM2 might have different etiologies.

Objective: To investigate whether the yield of population-based diabetes screening is influenced by characteristics of the general practitioner (GP) and the practice., Design: Cross-sectional study., Setting: Seventy-nine general practices in the south-western region of the Netherlands., Subjects: From 2002 to 2004, 56 978 people were screened for diabetes. GPs completed a questionnaire containing items on the GP (age, gender, employment, special interest in diabetes, providing insulin therapy) and the practice (setting, location, number of patients from ethnic minority groups, specific diabetes clinic, involvement of practice assistant, practice nurse or diabetes nurse in diabetes care)., Main Outcome Measures: The ratio screen-detected diabetic patients/known diabetic patients per practice (SDM/KDM) and the number of detected diabetic patients per practice adjusted for practice size and age distribution (SDM per standardized practice)., Results: The yield of screening per practice varied widely. Higher age of the GP (regression coefficient 0.20; 95% confidence interval, CI 0.07-0.34), urban location (-4.60; 95% CI -6.41 to -2.78) and involvement of the practice assistant (2.27; 95% CI 0.49-4.06) were independently associated with SDM/KDM. Using the other outcome variable, results were similar. Additionally, cooperation with a diabetes nurse was associated with a lower yield., Conclusion: A lower yield of screening, reflecting a lower prevalence of undiagnosed diabetes, was found in practices of younger GPs and in urban practices. A lower yield was not associated with an appropriate practice organization regarding diabetes care nor with a specialty of the GP in diabetes. The wide variation in the yield of screening stresses the importance of a screening programme in each general practice.

Background: About 10 years ago, it was estimated that half of all people with diabetes were unrecognized. Since then, according to the national guidelines, case finding for diabetes in general practice has become common in the Netherlands, resulting in a substantial increase of the prevalence of known diabetes. Nevertheless, the need for population-based screening is advocated, especially by the national federation of diabetes patients., Objective: To evaluate the efficiency of population-based screening for Type 2 diabetes., Methods: From 2002 to 2004, we performed a four-step screening procedure [questionnaire, random glucose measurement, fasting glucose measurement and oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT)] and a three-step procedure (without random glucose measurement) in 79 general practices in the southwestern region of the Netherlands., Results: A total of 56 978 non-diabetic subjects, aged 50-70 years, were asked to complete the questionnaire. Those with a score above threshold underwent further glucose testing. Eventually, 586 participants (1.0%) were diagnosed with Type 2 diabetes (in four-step procedure 285 subjects and in three-step procedure 301). Impaired glucose regulation was assessed in 1011 participants (1.8%). Dropout rate in the screening programme among participants who should undergo an OGTT was 23.4%. The risk score was higher if glucose metabolism was more disturbed., Conclusion: In the Netherlands, the yield of population-based screening is low. The dropout among high-risk individuals was high. Given the decreasing prevalence of undiagnosed diabetes and the possibility of opportunistic screening on a continuous basis, opportunistic screening for diabetes might be more appropriate than population-based screening. Further research on this topic is needed.

Aims/hypothesis: The determinants of cerebral complications of type 2 diabetes are unclear. The present study aimed to identify metabolic and vascular factors that are associated with impaired cognitive performance and abnormalities on brain MRI in patients with type 2 diabetes., Methods: The study included 122 patients and 56 controls. Neuropsychological test scores were divided into five cognitive domains and expressed as standardised z values. Brain MRI scans were rated for white matter lesions (WML), cortical and subcortical atrophy, and infarcts. Data on glucose metabolism, vascular risk factors and micro- and macrovascular disease were collected., Results: Patients with type 2 diabetes had more cortical (p < 0.001) and subcortical (p < 0.01) atrophy and deep WML (p = 0.02) than the control group and their cognitive performance was worse. In multivariate regression analyses within the type 2 diabetes group, hypertension (p < 0.05) and a history of vascular events (p < 0.01) were associated with worse cognitive performance, while statin use was associated (p < 0.05) with better performance. Retinopathy and brain infarcts on MRI were associated with more severe cortical atrophy (both p < 0.01) and statin use with less atrophy (p < 0.05). Insulin level and brain infarcts were associated with more severe WML and statin use with less severe WML (all p < 0.05)., Conclusions/interpretation: Type 2 diabetes is associated with modest impairments in cognition, as well as atrophy and vascular lesions on MRI. This 'diabetic encephalopathy' is a multifactorial condition, for which atherosclerotic (macroangiopathic) vascular disease is an important determinant. Chronic hyperglycaemia, hyperinsulinaemia and hypertension may play additional roles.

Background: Reducing cardiovascular risk in patients with diabetes mellitus type 2 (DM2) is important in diabetes care. However, treating patients according to clinical guidelines appears to be difficult. Delegating routine tasks to a practice nurse combined with computerized decision support systems (CDSS) may be helpful. The objective was to study the effectiveness of practice nurse-managed CDSS for diabetes care on improving cardiovascular risk factors in DM2 patients., Methods: In 113 primary care practices (n = 7,893 DM2 patients) across the Netherlands, the diabetes care protocol (DCP) was assessed in a before-after study, lasting 1 year. All practices implemented DCP, which is characterized by delegation of routine tasks in diabetes care to a practice nurse, software that supports diabetes management, medical decisions, and benchmarking (CDSS). All DM2 patients treated by their primary care physician were asked to attend the program. Primary outcome was the percentage of patients achieving treatment targets: hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c)

Aim: To determine the acceptability of an educational leaflet regarding the prevention and treatment of infections of the lower respiratory tract (LRTIs) and urinary tract (UTIs) and to determine the effects of the leaflet on knowledge and attitude of DM2 patients in primary care., Method: In a randomized controlled intervention trial 200 DM2 patients enlisted in two practices, one urban and one rural, from the Utrecht general practitioners Research Network (HNU) were selected. Per practice, 50 patients were randomly assigned to the intervention group and 50 to the control group. The intervention was a leaflet on diabetes and LRTIs and UTIs based on the results of focus group interviews. The leaflet was sent to the patients homes. The outcome measures were acceptability of the leaflet and differences in knowledge and attitude, measured by a questionnaire., Results: The mean age was 68 years and 55% was male. There were no substantial differences in characteristics between the two groups. Among the intervention group, the leaflet was appreciated as understandable (100%) and inviting (79%). Compared to the control group, specific knowledge and attitude did not substantially differ. Patients in the intervention group had a slightly more positive attitude about 'being attentive to signs indicating pneumonia' (median difference, 1 point; p=.003) and they also answered 'UTI is mostly caused by a bacteria' more often correctly (risk difference, 18%; 95% CI, 4-33%, p=.016)., Conclusion: A leaflet on prevention and treatment of LRTIs and UTIs is considered acceptable among DM2 patients, but a multi-faceted educational approach may be needed to improve health behavioral determinants.

Aim: The EUCCLID study aims to compare the quality of type 2 diabetes (DM2) care and the prevalence of complications in primary care DM2 patients in Europe., Design: A cross-sectional survey consisting of three parallel studies: (1) study on actual clinical practice; (2) study on patient's perspective of diabetes care; (3) study on general practitioner's perspective of diabetes care., Methods: Patients will be randomly selected from a list of all patients known to the participating GPs with DM2 for whom the GP is the main diabetes care provider. Exclusion criteria will include people with type 1 diabetes mellitus, diabetes of pregnancy, serious mental illness, unable to complete a questionnaire in national language or unable to give written informed consent. Approximately 12,000 patients will be included. Participants will have a detailed medical history and anthropometric measurements, blood and urine will be collected and questionnaires will be taken. Endpoints will include quality indicators of clinical DM2 care, prevalence of diabetic complications, knowledge, attitudes, barriers and behaviour affecting good control in DM2 patients, quality of life and patients' satisfaction with diabetes care. We will also determine primary care physician's attitudes, behaviour and perception of barriers to deliver effective diabetes care.

Objective: To investigate if there is a relationship between patients' perceived diabetes education and their glycaemic control., Methods: Two hundred and forty-seven diabetic (both DM 1 and DM 2) patients who were treated for diabetes in a primary nurse led health care clinic in South Africa were analyzed. Patients were interviewed, and information was retrieved from the patients' medical record., Results: Fasting blood glucose levels were <7.0 mmol/l in 17.6% of the patients, 79.3% of the patients had a BMI>2788.2% of the patients received information about diabetes, the majority received information from the nurse. Patients with a higher educational level and patients who received education tended to have a better glycaemic control. (n.s.) Significantly more patients who received information had a good or acceptable FBG level (p=0.03). The recorded prevalence of chronic complications was low., Conclusions: Glycaemic control was suboptimal in the big majority of patients. Education had a positive effect on glycaemic control, albeit not impressive. Also in South Africa poor health literacy should be taken into account in diabetes education.

Aims: To determine cardiovascular risk of screen detected subjects with type 2 diabetes (T2DM), impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) and impaired fasting glucose (IFG). To examine whether BMI is an effect modifier regarding the relation between level of glucose regulation and cardiovascular risk factors., Methods: From 2002 to 2003, 29,251 persons, aged 50-70 years, participated in a population-based diabetes screening programme. Diagnosis was based on the 1999 WHO criteria. Characteristics were assessed of 285 subjects with T2DM, 175 with IGT and 218 with IFG., Results: IFG did not resemble IGT and T2DM regarding weight and blood pressure. BMI (kg/m2) was 27.3+/-4.4, 29.5+/-5.7, 30.7+/-5.6 in IFG, IGT, DM, respectively; systolic blood pressure (mmHg) 150+/-25, 161+/-24, 162+/-23; diastolic blood pressure (mmHg) 84+/-12, 89+/-12, 90+/-11. The poorer the glycaemic control, the worse levels of BMI, blood pressure and lipids. When BMI was higher, cardiovascular risk factors were more adverse, especially in subjects with diabetes., Conclusions: Subjects with IFG had lower blood pressure and weight than subjects with IGT and T2DM suggesting IFG is a condition with less risk to develop cardiovascular diseases. Effect modification by BMI was found.

Background: Type 2 diabetes is an important, chronic condition notorious for its costly and disabling complications. Nowadays, enhanced cooperation is expected to improve the quality of diabetes care and reduce risks for chronically ill patients. It is, however, questionable whether this assumption is evidence based., Methods: Using a structured literature search, we selected systematic reviews, randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and other effect evaluations regarding the sharing and allocation of diabetes care., Results: We selected 22 studies to include in this review. The process of care improved in all studies investigating this quality aspect. HbA1c improved in seven reviews and in five other studies. All included reviews and four RCTs were unable to demonstrate a positive effect on blood pressure. Total cholesterol improved in two reviews and five other studies., Conclusions: The sharing and allocation of diabetes care leads to significant reduction in HbA1c and improves the process of care. However, this improvement has not as yet led to better cardiovascular risk management. For a number of reasons, a truly accurate estimation of the results of shared and allocated diabetes care within the Dutch diabetes care system is not possible.

Background: Relatively few data are available to predict a complicated course of community-acquired complicated urinary tract infections (UTIs) in patients with diabetes type 2 (DM2). The aim of this study was to assess predictors for a complicated course of UTIs in DM2 patients in primary care., Method: We conducted a cross-sectional questionnaire study among DM2 patients aged over 45 years as part of an educational trial. The combined outcome measure was a complicated course of UTI, defined as a self-reported episode of acute pyelonephritis, prostatitis or recurrent cystitis in the 12 months before the trial. Patients with an outcome were all verified by review of medical records. A prediction model was derived with multivariable logistic regression analysis., Results: Of the 1151 trial participants, 94 (8%) had a self-reported community-acquired complicated course of UTIs and 62 (66%) of these were medically-attended. Independent predictors for a complicated course were age above 60 years (adjusted odds ratio (OR): 1.74; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.99-3.03), chronic use of antibiotics (adjusted OR: 5.50; 95% CI: 2.31-13.08), more than 6 physician contacts in previous year (adjusted OR: 3.60; 95% CI: 2.00-6.49), hospitalization in previous year (adjusted OR: 1.36; 95% CI: 1.00-1.85), renal disease (adjusted OR: 4.92; 95% CI: 1.59-15.18) and incontinence of urine (adjusted OR: 3.78; 95% CI: 1.93-7.38). Area under the receiver-operating curve was 0.72 (95% CI: 0.66-0.78). Analysis according to medically attended complicated UTIs did not change our findings., Conclusion: Easily obtainable predictors from medical history can be used to accurately predict a complicated course of UTIs in DM2 patients.

Objective: To examine whether dieting--restriction of food intake for the purpose of weight control--suppresses or promotes excessive food intake and weight gain., Design: A 4-year follow-up study of a dietary intervention in a sample of 97 patients with newly diagnosed Type 2 diabetes., Main Outcome Measures: Weight gain, change in body mass index (measured weight in kilograms divided by measured height squared), and intake of energy, as measured with a food frequency questionnaire, were assessed in relation to dietary restraint and tendency to overeat (emotionally or externally induced overeating), as assessed with the Dutch Eating Behaviour Questionnaire., Results: Tendency to overeat at diagnosis and not dietary restraint was associated with weight gain and intake of energy 4 years after diagnosis., Conclusion: These findings suggest that the success of a dietary intervention can be predicted by a subject's tendency toward overeating. The possibility of matched treatment of obesity is discussed on the basis of the distinction between patients with a low versus a high tendency to overeat.

The practice guideline 'Diabetes mellitus type 2' (second revision) addresses the diagnosis, treatment and management of adults with diabetes mellitus type 2 in general practice. The aim of management is the prevention and treatment of diabetes-related symptoms and complications such as cardiovascular disease, nephro-, retino- and neuropathy. The general practitioner gives the patient education and lifestyle advice and repeats this regularly. In addition, the general practitioner and the patient strive to achieve good glycaemic control. The agent of first choice in the medicinal treatment of all type 2 diabetic patients is metformin. This is continued even after the addition of a sulphonylurea derivative or insulin. This represents a change compared to the previous version of the practice guideline. The indications for thiazolidinediones are limited. To reduce the cardiovascular risk, it is advised to aim at a systolic blood pressure below 140 mmHg. It is also recommended that each patient be prescribed a statin, unless the patient belongs to a subgroup in which the indication for cholesterol lowering therapy is weak or the patient refuses it. Compared to the former guideline, more emphasis is placed on the prevention of nephropathy. The general practitioner is advised to calculate the creatinine clearance yearly and to test for relevant albuminuria in each patient with a life expectancy of 10 years or more. If microalbuminuria is present, the patient is prescribed an angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor, even if the blood pressure is not elevated. The detection of patients with a high risk of diabetic ulcer is also given more emphasis.

Objective: Influenza vaccine uptake remains low among the high-risk group of patients with diabetes, partly because of conflicting evidence regarding its potential benefits. We assessed the clinical effectiveness of influenza vaccination in adults with diabetes and specifically examined potential modification of effect by age and prior influenza vaccine uptake., Research Design and Methods: The study was part of the Prevention of Influenza, Surveillance and Management (PRISMA) study, a nested case-control study conducted during the 1999-2000 influenza A epidemic, among 75,235 patients from primary care of any age recommended for vaccination. Among 9,238 adult patients with diabetes, 131 cases arose who were either hospitalized for diabetes dysregulation, acute respiratory disease, or cardiovascular disease and 61 cases who died, and we compared them with 1,561 control subjects. We evaluated the effect of (prior) influenza vaccination by means of logistic regression analysis controlling for age, sex, health insurance coverage, prior health care use, medication use, and comorbid conditions., Results: Vaccination was associated with a 56% reduction in any complication (95% CI 36-70%), a 54% reduction in hospitalizations (26-71%), and 58% reduction in deaths (13-80%). Among study subjects aged 18-64 years, we observed somewhat higher reductions in the occurrence of any complication than among those aged >65 years (72 vs. 39%). In first-time vaccinated subjects, the primary end point was reduced by 47% (0.2-72%), and in those who received vaccination in the year before, the reduction was 58% (4-81%)., Conclusions: Adults with type 2 diabetes, like other individuals from recognized risk groups, benefit considerably from influenza vaccination, and no difference in vaccine effectiveness was observed between first-time and repeat vaccination.

Aim: To assess restrained, emotional and external eating behaviour in patients newly diagnosed with Type 2 diabetes compared with the general population, and to assess the relationship of eating behaviour to changes in fat and energy., Methods: We assessed emotional, external, and restrained eating behaviour and measured fat and energy intake in a cohort of patients with newly diagnosed Type 2 diabetes. Data from a comparable sample of the general population served as reference figures. We calculated correlation coefficients of the three different types of eating behaviour at diagnosis between: (i) energy and fat intake at diagnosis and (ii) changes in energy and fat intake between diagnosis and both 8 weeks and 4 years later. In addition, we used a stepwise multiple regression model with energy and fat intake or changes in energy and fat intake as dependent variables., Results: The distribution of the three types of eating behaviour was similar in patients with Type 2 diabetes and the general population. Emotional and external eating was associated with increased intake of energy and fat. Conversely, restrained eating showed an inverse correlation with energy and fat intake. External eating, but not emotional eating, showed a statistically significant relation with a decrease in energy intake in women. We found no statistically significant correlations between eating behaviour (measured at diagnosis) and changes in energy and fat intake between diagnosis and 4 years., Conclusions: Patients newly diagnosed with Type 2 diabetes have similar eating behaviour compared with the general population. At diagnosis, external eating behaviour and emotional eating behaviour are associated with high-energy intake and restrained eating behaviour with low-energy intake. Women with high scores for emotional eating behaviour seem to be less able to make initial dietary changes after being diagnosed and having received dietary advice.

Objective: To determine the risk of common infections in patients with diabetes mellitus type 1 (DM1) or type 2 (DM2)., Design: Prospective controlled study., Methods: In a 12-month prospective cohort study as part of the Second Dutch National Survey of General Practice, 705 adult DM1 and 6,712 DM2 patients were compared with 18,911 control patients who had hypertension without diabetes. Outcome measures were medically-attended episodes of infections of the respiratory tract, urinary tract, skin and mucous membranes. Multivariate and multinomial logistic regression analysis was applied to determine independent risks of infections and their recurrence in patients with diabetes compared to controls., Results: Upper respiratory-tract infections were as common in diabetes patients as in controls. Diabetes patients had a higher risk of lower respiratory-tract infections (DM2: odds ratio (OR): 1.30; 95% CI: 1.11-1.52), urinary-tract infections (DM1: OR: 1.56; 95% CI: 1.13-2.15; DM2: OR: 1.21; 95% CI: 1.07-1.38), bacterial skin or mucous-membrane infections (DM1: OR: 1.48; 95% CI: 1.01-2.15; DM2: OR: 1.32; 95% CI: 1.13-1.55) and mycotic skin or mucous-membrane infections (DM2: OR: 1.41; 95% CI: 1.24-1.61). The risk of recurrence of these common infections was seen to be increased., Conclusions: Patients with type-1 and type-2 diabetes are at increased risk of lower respiratory-tract infections, urinary-tract infections and skin or mucous-membrane infections.