Search

The article offers a summary of the Clinical Practice Guideline (CPG) on the management of patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). The guideline was based on the recommendations from the Cancer Care Ontario (CCO) and the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO). The authors of the guideline are mentioned which include Ethan Basch, Thomas K. Oliver and Michael Carducci.

Objective: Data extraction from the published literature is the most laborious step in conducting living systematic reviews (LSRs). We aim to build a generalizable, automated data extraction workflow leveraging large language models (LLMs) that mimics the real-world two-reviewer process., Materials and Methods: A dataset of 10 clinical trials (22 publications) from a published LSR was used, focusing on 23 variables related to trial, population, and outcomes data. The dataset was split into prompt development (n=5) and held-out test sets (n=17). GPT-4-turbo and Claude-3-Opus were used for data extraction. Responses from the two LLMs were compared for concordance. In instances with discordance, original responses from each LLM were provided to the other LLM for cross-critique. Evaluation metrics, including accuracy, were used to assess performance against the manually curated gold standard., Results: In the prompt development set, 110 (96%) responses were concordant, achieving an accuracy of 0.99 against the gold standard. In the test set, 342 (87%) responses were concordant. The accuracy of the concordant responses was 0.94. The accuracy of the discordant responses was 0.41 for GPT-4-turbo and 0.50 for Claude-3-Opus. Of the 49 discordant responses, 25 (51%) became concordant after cross-critique, with an increase in accuracy to 0.76., Discussion: Concordant responses by the LLMs are likely to be accurate. In instances of discordant responses, cross-critique can further increase the accuracy., Conclusion: Large language models, when simulated in a collaborative, two-reviewer workflow, can extract data with reasonable performance, enabling truly 'living' systematic reviews.

ASCO Rapid Recommendation Updates highlight revisions to select ASCO guideline recommendations as a response to the emergence of new and practice-changing data. The rapid updates are supported by an evidence review and follow the guideline development processes outlined in the ASCO Guideline Methodology Manual . The goal of these articles is to disseminate updated recommendations, in a timely manner, to better inform health practitioners and the public on the best available cancer care options. Guidelines and updates are not intended to substitute for independent professional judgment of the treating provider and do not account for individual variation among patients. See appendix for disclaimers and other important information (Appendix 1 and Appendix 2, online only).

Introduction: Blood-based diagnostics and prognostics in sporadic Alzheimer's disease (AD) are important for identifying at-risk individuals for therapeutic interventions., Methods: In three stages, a total of 34 leukocyte antigens were examined by flow cytometry immunophenotyping. Data were analyzed by logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses., Results: We identified leukocyte markers differentially expressed in the patients with AD. Pathway analysis revealed a complex network involving upregulation of complement inhibition and downregulation of cargo receptor activity and Aβ clearance. A proposed panel including four leukocyte markers - CD11c, CD59, CD91, and CD163 - predicts patients' PET Aβ status with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.93 (0.88 to 0.97). CD163 was the top performer in preclinical models. These findings have been validated in two independent cohorts., Conclusion: Our finding of changes on peripheral leukocyte surface antigens in AD implicates the deficit in innate immunity. Leukocyte-based biomarkers prove to be both sensitive and practical for AD screening and diagnosis., (© 2022 The Authors. Alzheimer's & Dementia published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Alzheimer's Association.)

ASCO Rapid Recommendations Updates highlight revisions to select ASCO guideline recommendations as a response to the emergence of new and practice-changing data. The rapid updates are supported by an evidence review and follow the guideline development processes outlined in the ASCO Guideline Methodology Manual. The goal of these articles is to disseminate updated recommendations, in a timely manner, to better inform health practitioners and the public on the best available cancer care options .

Alzheimer's disease (AD) has shown altered immune responses in the periphery. We studied P2X7 (a proinflammatory receptor and a scavenger receptor) and two integrins, CD11b and CD11c, on the surface of circulating leukocytes and analysed their associations with Aβ-PET, brain atrophy, neuropsychological assessments, and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers. Total 287 age-matched, sex-balanced participants were recruited in a discovery cohort and two validation cohorts through the AIBL study and studied using tri-colour flow cytometry. Our results demonstrated reduced expressions of P2X7, CD11b, and CD11c on leukocytes, particularly monocytes, in Aβ +ve cases compared with Aβ -ve controls. P2X7 and integrin downregulation was observed at pre-clinical stage of AD and stayed low throughout disease course. We further constructed a polygenic risk score (PRS) model based on 12 P2RX7 risk alleles to assess the genetic impact on P2X7 function in AIBL and ADNI cohorts. No significant association was identified between the P2RX7 gene and AD, indicating that P2X7 downregulation in AD is likely caused by environmental changes rather than genetic factors. In conclusion, the downregulation of P2X7 and integrins at pre-clinical stage of AD indicates altered pro-inflammatory responses, phagocytic functions, and migrating capabilities of circulating monocytes in early AD pathogenesis. Our study not only improves our understanding of peripheral immune involvement in early stage of AD but also provides more insights into novel biomarker development, diagnosis, and prognosis of AD.

Background: The Australian Imaging, Biomarkers and Lifestyle (AIBL) Study commenced in 2006 as a prospective study of 1,112 individuals (768 cognitively normal (CN), 133 with mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and 211 with Alzheimer's disease dementia (AD)) as an 'Inception cohort' who underwent detailed ssessments every 18 months. Over the past decade, an additional 1247 subjects have been added as an 'Enrichment cohort' (as of 10 April 2019)., Objective: Here we provide an overview of these Inception and Enrichment cohorts of more than 8,500 person-years of investigation., Methods: Participants underwent reassessment every 18 months including comprehensive cognitive testing, neuroimaging (magnetic resonance imaging, MRI; positron emission tomography, PET), biofluid biomarkers and lifestyle evaluations., Results: AIBL has made major contributions to the understanding of the natural history of AD, with cognitive and biological definitions of its three major stages: preclinical, prodromal and clinical. Early deployment of Aβ-amyloid and tau molecular PET imaging and the development of more sensitive and specific blood tests have facilitated the assessment of genetic and environmental factors which affect age at onset and rates of progression., Conclusion: This fifteen-year study provides a large database of highly characterized individuals with longitudinal cognitive, imaging and lifestyle data and biofluid collections, to aid in the development of interventions to delay onset, prevent or treat AD. Harmonization with similar large longitudinal cohort studies is underway to further these aims., Competing Interests: The following authors have no CoI to declare: CF, SRRS, SB, JB, PB, BMB, SCB, CC, JD, VD, KAE, LE, AF, JF, SLG, SG, RG, EH, RH, LJ, AK, FL, NTL, QXL, LL, YYL, AL, SLM, LMa, SM, LMi, MP, KP, TP, MRa, AR, JR, MRo, RR, OS, GS, BS, MS, HRS, KT, TT, CT, BT, RT, MV, MWe, MWo, YX. AIB is a shareholder in Alterity Therapeutics Ltd, Cogstate Ltd, Mesoblast Ltd, and is a paid consultant for, and has a profit share interest in, Collaborative Medicinal Development Pty Ltd. SC has received payments from Biogen for advice in relation to CSF biomarkers of Alzheimer’s disease. SML has previously been a paid consultant to Alzhyme. RNM is founder of, and owns stock in, Alzhyme, and is a co-founder of the KaRa Institute of Neurological Diseases. PM is a full-time employee of Cogstate Ltd. CLM is an advisor to Prana Biotechnology Ltd and a consultant to Eli Lilly. CCR has served on scientific advisory boards for Bayer Pharma, Elan Corporation, GE Healthcare and AstraZeneca, has received speaker honoraria from Bayer Pharma and GE Healthcare, and has received research support from Bayer Pharma, GE Healthcare, Piramal Lifesciences and Avid Radiopharmaceuticals. VLV has served as a consultant for Bayer Pharma and received research support from a NEDO grant from Japan. DA has served on scientific advisory boards for Novartis, Eli Lilly, Janssen, and Pfizer Inc., (© 2021 – The authors. Published by IOS Press.)

Context: - A complete diagnosis of acute leukemia requires knowledge of clinical information combined with morphologic evaluation, immunophenotyping and karyotype analysis, and often, molecular genetic testing. Although many aspects of the workup for acute leukemia are well accepted, few guidelines have addressed the different aspects of the diagnostic evaluation of samples from patients suspected to have acute leukemia., Objective: - To develop a guideline for treating physicians and pathologists involved in the diagnostic and prognostic evaluation of new acute leukemia samples, including acute lymphoblastic leukemia, acute myeloid leukemia, and acute leukemias of ambiguous lineage., Design: - The College of American Pathologists and the American Society of Hematology convened a panel of experts in hematology and hematopathology to develop recommendations. A systematic evidence review was conducted to address 6 key questions. Recommendations were derived from strength of evidence, feedback received during the public comment period, and expert panel consensus., Results: - Twenty-seven guideline statements were established, which ranged from recommendations on what clinical and laboratory information should be available as part of the diagnostic and prognostic evaluation of acute leukemia samples to what types of testing should be performed routinely, with recommendations on where such testing should be performed and how the results should be reported., Conclusions: - The guideline provides a framework for the multiple steps, including laboratory testing, in the evaluation of acute leukemia samples. Some aspects of the guideline, especially molecular genetic testing in acute leukemia, are rapidly changing with new supportive literature, which will require on-going updates for the guideline to remain relevant.

Purpose: To endorse Cancer Care Ontario's guideline on Active Surveillance for the Management of Localized Prostate Cancer. The American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) has a policy and set of procedures for endorsing clinical practice guidelines developed by other professional organizations., Methods: The Active Surveillance for the Management of Localized Prostate Cancer guideline was reviewed for developmental rigor by methodologists. The ASCO Endorsement Panel then reviewed the content and the recommendations., Results: The ASCO Endorsement Panel determined that the recommendations from the Active Surveillance for the Management of Localized Prostate Cancer guideline, published in May 2015, are clear, thorough, and based upon the most relevant scientific evidence. ASCO endorsed the Active Surveillance for the Management of Localized Prostate Cancer guideline with added qualifying statements. The Cancer Care Ontario recommendation regarding 5-alpha reductase inhibitors was not endorsed by the ASCO panel., Recommendations: For most patients with low-risk (Gleason score ≤ 6) localized prostate cancer, active surveillance is the recommended disease management strategy. Factors including younger age, prostate cancer volume, patient preference, and ethnicity should be taken into account when making management decisions. Select patients with low-volume, intermediate-risk (Gleason 3 + 4 = 7) prostate cancer may be offered active surveillance. Active surveillance protocols should include prostate-specific antigen testing, digital rectal examinations, and serial prostate biopsies. Ancillary radiologic and genomic tests are investigational but may have a role in patients with discordant clinical and/or pathologic findings. Patients who are reclassified to a higher-risk category (Gleason score ≥ 7) or who have significant increases in tumor volume on subsequent biopsies should be offered active therapy., (© 2016 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.)

Question: Is there a benefit associated with the use of extracorporeal photopheresis (ecp) compared with other treatment options for patients who have received allogeneic stem-cell transplantation (sct) and are experiencing graft-versus-host disease (gvhd), if response rate, survival, or improvement in symptoms are the outcomes of interest?, Perspectives: After allogeneic sct, gvhd is a common complication historically categorized as either acute (agvhd: onset ≤100 days post-transplantation) or chronic (cgvhd: >100 days post-transplantation). Graft-versus-host disease occurs when the donor's immune cells recognize the host patient's tissues and organs as foreign and attack them, causing a multitude of problems, often in liver, gastrointestinal system, and skin. Photopheresis is one therapy that has emerged since the early 2000s for the management of steroid-refractory gvhd because of its steroid-sparing ability, low associated toxicity, and efficacy in some clinical settings. The present recommendation report summarizes the available data about photopheresis for the treatment of gvhd and provides recommendations on its use., Methodology: The medline (Ovid) database was systematically searched for January 1995 to August 2013, and the best available evidence was used to draft recommendations relevant to adult and pediatric patients in Ontario who have received allogeneic sct and are experiencing gvhd. Draft recommendations were first reviewed by clinical and methodology experts before undergoing internal review. Final approval of this practice guideline report was obtained from both the Stem Cell Transplant Steering Committee and the Report Approval Panel of the Program in Evidence-Based Care., Recommendations: These recommendations apply to adult and pediatric patients who have received an allogeneic sct and are experiencing gvhd: ecp is an acceptable therapy for the treatment of steroid-dependent or refractory agvhd in adult and pediatric patients.ecp is an effective therapy for the treatment of steroid-dependent or refractory cgvhd in adult and pediatric patients., Qualifying Statement: In Ontario, ecp is currently a covered therapy for patients with steroid-refractory gvhd who meet certain eligibility criteria.

Objective: To identify plasma biomarkers for the diagnosis of Alzheimer disease (AD)., Design: Baseline plasma screening of 151 multiplexed analytes combined with targeted biomarker and clinical pathology data., Setting: General community-based, prospective, longitudinal study of aging., Participants: A total of 754 healthy individuals serving as controls and 207 participants with AD from the Australian Imaging Biomarker and Lifestyle study (AIBL) cohort with identified biomarkers that were validated in 58 healthy controls and 112 individuals with AD from the Alzheimer Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) cohort., Results: A biomarker panel was identified that included markers significantly increased (cortisol, pancreatic polypeptide, insulinlike growth factor binding protein 2, β(2) microglobulin, vascular cell adhesion molecule 1, carcinoembryonic antigen, matrix metalloprotein 2, CD40, macrophage inflammatory protein 1α, superoxide dismutase, and homocysteine) and decreased (apolipoprotein E, epidermal growth factor receptor, hemoglobin, calcium, zinc, interleukin 17, and albumin) in AD. Cross-validated accuracy measures from the AIBL cohort reached a mean (SD) of 85% (3.0%) for sensitivity and specificity and 93% (3.0) for the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. A second validation using the ADNI cohort attained accuracy measures of 80% (3.0%) for sensitivity and specificity and 85% (3.0) for area under the receiver operating characteristic curve., Conclusions: This study identified a panel of plasma biomarkers that distinguish individuals with AD from cognitively healthy control subjects with high sensitivity and specificity. Cross-validation within the AIBL cohort and further validation within the ADNI cohort provides strong evidence that the identified biomarkers are important for AD diagnosis.

Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) is a newer method of radiotherapy that uses intensity-modulated beams that can provide multiple intensity levels for any single beam direction and any single source position allowing concave dose distributions and dose gradients with narrower margins than those possible using conventional methods. IMRT is ideal for treating complex treatment volumes and avoiding close proximity organs at risk that may be dose limiting and provides increased tumour control through an escalated dose and reduces normal tissue complications through organ at risk sparing. Given the potential advantages of IMRT and the availability of IMRT-enabled treatment planning systems and linear accelerators, IMRT has been introduced in a number of disease sites. This systematic review examined the evidence for IMRT in the treatment of gynaecological cancers to quantify the potential benefits of this new technology and to make recommendations for radiation treatment programmes considering adopting this technique. Findings were based on a review of four cohort studies, one of which was prospective, including a total of 619 patients. If reducing acute and chronic toxicity are the main outcomes of interest, then IMRT may be considered over three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy for women with gynaecological cancers; if disease-related outcomes are the main outcomes of interest, there are insufficient data to recommend IMRT over three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy. Future research should focus on prospective multicentre studies reporting on both acute and chronic toxicity as well as survival and recurrence. Dose escalation studies should be carried out to investigate the effect of higher doses on disease., (Copyright © 2012. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) is an advancement in radiotherapy that uses intensity-modulated beams, which can provide multiple intensity levels for any single beam direction and any single source position, allowing shaped distributions and dose gradients with narrower margins than previously possible. IMRT is ideal for treating complex treatment volumes and avoiding close proximity organs at risk that may be dose limiting, allowing dose escalation (to improve tumour control) and/or reducing normal tissue complications (through organ at risk sparing). Given these potential advantages of IMRT and the availability of IMRT planning systems and linear accelerators, IMRT has been introduced in a number of disease sites. This systematic review examined the evidence for IMRT in the treatment of lung cancer in order to quantify the potential benefits and to make recommendations for radiation treatment programmes considering adopting IMRT. This review revealed two retrospective cohort studies reporting on cancer outcomes, which was considered insufficient on which to make evidence-based recommendations. However, due to the known dosimetric properties of IMRT and extrapolating from clinical outcomes from other disease sites, IMRT should be considered for lung cancer patients where the tumour is in close proximity to an organ at risk, where the target volume includes a large volume of an organ at risk, or in scenarios where dose escalation would be potentially beneficial while minimising normal tissue toxicity. Until randomised data are available, future research in IMRT for lung cancer should include a comprehensive prospective assessment of the relevant outcomes, including tumour control and normal tissue toxicity., (Crown Copyright © 2012. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) as the primary treatment for prostate cancer has improved outcomes compared with conventional radiotherapy, but with an associated increase in toxicity due to radiation effects on the bladder and rectum. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) is a newer method of radiotherapy that uses intensity-modulated beams that can provide multiple intensity levels for any single beam direction and any single source position allowing concave dose distributions and dose gradients with narrower margins than those possible using conventional methods. IMRT is ideal for treating complex treatment volumes and avoiding close proximity organs at risk that may be dose limiting and provides increased tumour control through an escalated dose and reduces normal tissue complications through organ at risk sparing. Given the potential advantages of IMRT and the availability of IMRT-enabled treatment planning systems and linear accelerators, IMRT has been introduced in a number of disease sites, including prostate cancer. This systematic review examined the evidence for IMRT in the treatment of prostate cancer in order to quantify the potential benefits of this new technology and to make recommendations for radiation treatment programmes considering adopting this technique. The findings were in favour of recommending IMRT over 3DCRT in the radical treatment of localised prostate cancer where doses greater than 70 Gy are required, based on a review of 11 published reports including 4559 patients. There were insufficient data to recommend IMRT over 3DCRT in the postoperative setting. Future research should examine image-guided IMRT in the post-prostatectomy setting, with altered fractionation, and in combination with hormone and chemotherapy., (Crown Copyright © 2012. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) is a newer method of radiotherapy that uses intensity-modulated beams that can provide multiple intensity levels for any single-beam direction and any single-source position, allowing concave dose distributions and dose gradients with narrower margins than those possible using conventional methods. IMRT is ideal for treating complex treatment volumes and avoiding close proximity organs at risk that may be dose limiting and provides increased tumour control through an escalated dose and reduces normal tissue complications through organ at risk sparing. Given the potential advantages of IMRT and the availability of IMRT-enabled treatment planning systems and linear accelerators, IMRT has been introduced in a number of disease sites, including head and neck cancer. This systematic review examined the evidence for IMRT compared with two-dimensional external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) in the treatment of head and neck cancer in order to quantify the potential benefits of this new technology and made recommendations for radiation treatment programmes considering adopting this technique. Findings were in favour of IMRT compared with two-dimensional EBRT where avoidance of the adverse outcomes xerostomia, osteoradionecrosis and blindness are the main outcomes of interest, based on a review of 15 papers including 1555 patients. There are insufficient data to recommend IMRT over two-dimensional EBRT if treatment-related outcomes are the main outcomes of interest. Future research should focus on additional normal tissue preservation, and the role of IMRT in the treatment of recurrent head and neck cancer, as well as its use in combination with surgery, chemotherapy and/or brachytherapy., (Crown Copyright © 2012. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) is a newer method of radiotherapy that uses beams with multiple intensity levels for any single beam, allowing concave dose distributions and tighter margins than those possible using conventional radiotherapy. IMRT is ideal for treating complex treatment volumes and avoiding close proximity organs at risk that may be dose limiting and provides increased tumour control through an escalated dose and reduces normal tissue complications through organ at risk sparing. Given the potential advantages of IMRT and the availability of IMRT-enabled treatment planning systems and linear accelerators, IMRT has been introduced in a number of disease sites. This systematic review examined the evidence for IMRT in the treatment of breast cancer to quantify the potential benefits of this new technology and to make recommendations for radiation treatment programmes considering adopting this technique. Providing that avoidance of acute adverse effects associated with radiation is an outcome of interest, then IMRT is recommended over tangential radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery, based on a review of six published reports including 2012 patients. There were insufficient data to recommend IMRT over standard tangential radiotherapy for reasons of oncological outcomes or late toxicity. Future research should focus on studies with longer follow-up and provide data on late toxicity and disease recurrence rates., (Copyright © 2012 The Royal College of Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second most common cause of cancer deaths in Canadian men and women - accounting for almost 12% of all cancer deaths. In Ontario, it is estimated that 8100 persons were diagnosed with CRC in 2011, and 3250 died from the disease. CRC incidence and mortality rates in Ontario are among the highest in the world. Screening offers the best opportunity to reduce this burden of disease. The present report describes the findings and recommendations of Cancer Care Ontario's Fecal Immunochemical Tests (FIT) Guidelines Expert Panel, which was convened in September 2010 by the Program in Evidence-Based Care. The purpose of the present guideline is to evaluate the existing evidence concerning FIT to inform the decision on how to replace the current guaiac fecal occult blood test with FIT in the Ontario ColonCancerCheck Program. Eleven articles were included in the present guideline, comprising two systematic reviews, five articles reporting on three randomized controlled trials, and reports of four other studies. Additionally, one laboratory study was obtained that reported on several parameters of FIT tests that helped to inform the present recommendation. The performance of FIT is superior to the standard guaiac fecal occult blood test in terms of screening participation rates and the detection of CRC and advanced adenoma. Given greater specimen instability with the use of FIT, a pilot study should be undertaken to determine how to implement the FIT in Ontario.

Background: The objective is to provide surgical and pathological guidelines for radical prostatectomy (RP) with or without concurrent pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) to achieve optimal benefit for patients, with minimal risk of harm., Methods: For surgical questions, a literature search of MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane database was performed. A literature search for the pathological questions was not conducted since the protocol for invasive carcinomas of the prostate gland developed by the College of American Pathologists (CAP) was endorsed. Urologists and pathologists were consulted for their assessment of the surgical and pathological recommendations., Results: Limited high-quality evidence from 95 primary studies was available and, therefore, the expert panel developed recommendations on the basis of a consensus of the expert opinion of the working group and through a consultation with urologists and pathologists. In addition to the CAP protocol, some technical recommendations related to the handling and processing of the specimen were made., Conclusion: Radical prostatectomy is recommended for the surgical treatment of prostate cancer, depending on a patient's preoperative risk profile. The panel unanimously determined that the goals for RP are to attain a positive margin rate of <25% for pT2 disease, a mortality rate of <1%, rates of rectal injury of <1% and blood transfusion rates of <10% in non-anemic patients. Standard PLND should be mandatory in high-risk patients, should be recommended for intermediate-risk patients and should be optional for low-risk patients. The quality and effectiveness of this treatment and of subsequent patient care depend on good management, effective communication and reporting between surgeons and pathologists working together as part of a multidisciplinary team. The complete guideline document is posted on the Cancer Care Ontario website (www.cancercare.on.ca); search in their Toolbox, Quality Guidelines & Standards, Clinical Program category under "surgery."

Amyloid-beta (Abeta) plays a central role in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease (AD) and has been postulated as a potential biomarker for AD. However, there is a lack of consensus as to its suitability as an AD biomarker. The objective of this study was to determine the significance of plasma Abeta as an AD biomarker and its relationship with Abeta load and to determine the effect of different assay methods on the interpretation of Abeta levels. Plasma Abeta1-40, Abeta1-42, and N-terminal cleaved fragments were measured using both a commercial multiplex assay and a well-documented ELISA in 1032 individuals drawn from the well-characterized Australian Imaging, Biomarkers and Lifestyle (AIBL) study of aging. Further, Abeta levels were compared to Abeta load derived from positron-emission tomography (PET) with the Pittsburgh compound B (PiB). Lower Abeta1-42 and Abeta1-42/1-40 ratio were observed in patients with AD and inversely correlated with PiB-PET derived Abeta load. However, assay methodology significantly impacted the interpretation of data. The cross-sectional analysis of plasma Abeta isoforms suggests that they may not be sufficient per se to diagnose AD. The value of their measurement in prognosis and monitoring of AD interventions needs further study, in addition to future longitudinal comparisons together with other predictors, which will determine whether plasma Abeta has diagnostic value in a panel of biomarkers.

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the most common cause of non-tobacco-related cancer deaths in Canadian men and women, accounting for 10% of all cancer deaths. An estimated 7800 men and women will be diagnosed with CRC, and 3250 will die from the disease in Ontario in 2007. Given that CRC incidence and mortality rates in Ontario are among the highest in the world, the best opportunity to reduce this burden of disease would be through screening. The present report describes the findings and recommendations of Cancer Care Ontario's Colonoscopy Standards Expert Panel, which was convened in March 2006 by the Program in Evidence-Based Care. The recommendations will form the basis of the quality assurance program for colonoscopy delivered in support of Ontario's CRC screening program.

Question: What is the role of oxaliplatin combined with 5-fluorouracil (5-fu) and folinic acid (fa) in the first- and second-line treatment of advanced (unresectable locally advanced or metastatic) colorectal cancer?, Perspectives: Evidence was selected and reviewed by two members of the Gastrointestinal Cancer Disease Site Group (gi dsg) of Cancer Care Ontario's Program in Evidence-Based Care (pebc) and by a methodologist. The resulting practice guideline report has been reviewed and approved by the gi dsg, which comprises medical and radiation oncologists, surgeons, a pathologist, and patient representatives. External review by Ontario practitioners was obtained through a mailed survey. Final approval of the original guideline report was obtained from the Practice Guidelines Coordinating Committee., Outcomes: Outcomes of interest were 1-year survival, response rates, and quality of life., Methodology: The medline, cancerlit, embase, Guidelines International Network, and Cochrane Library databases were systematically searched for relevant studies. Recommendations were formed based on the evidence reviewed. Through a survey, these recommendations were appraised by Ontario clinicians; the recommendations were then revised by the gi dsg. The systematic review and modified recommendations were approved by a review body within pebc., Results: The literature review found twenty-one randomized controlled trials and two meta-analyses. Evidence on first-line treatment found infusional 5-fu/fa/oxaliplatin (folfox) to be superior to bolus 5-fu/fa/irinotecan (ifl) for rates of median survival and tumour response, with lower incidences of most adverse effects except peripheral neuropathy. For second-line treatment after fluoropyrimidine monotherapy, folfox is a reasonable alternative for patients with contraindications to second-line irinotecan. After progression on infusional 5-fu/fa/irinotecan (folfiri), folfox is the preferred therapy. Evidence from a single randomized trial suggests that additional benefits can be expected with the addition of bevacizumab to the folfox regimen in second-line treatment., Practice Guideline: These recommendations apply to adult patients with advanced colorectal cancer who have high performance status (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group score 0-2). Refer to Appendix A for available treatment options and to Appendix b for recommended dosages and schedules. The folfox regimen is an important component of therapy for advanced colorectal cancer. FIRST-LINE THERAPY: In one trial, folfox was shown to be superior to ifl. The folfox regimen has superior rates of median survival and tumour response. Compared with ifl, folfox has lower incidences of severe nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, and febrile neutropenia, but a higher incidence of peripheral neuropathy. Short-term infusional 5-fu/fa in combination with either oxaliplatin (folfox) or irinotecan (folfiri) are both acceptable alternatives for fit patients when combination therapy is the preferred treatment. Choice of first-line therapy may rely on patient factors and preferences-for example, less neuropathy with irinotecan versus less alopecia with oxaliplatin. SECOND-LINE THERAPY: After progression on first-line anti-thymidylate synthase monotherapy (for example, 5-fu/fa, capecitabine), irinotecan is standard second-line therapy. The folfox regimen is a reasonable alternative for patients with contraindications to the use of second-line irinotecan. After progression on both irinotecan and an anti-thymidylate synthase agent, folfox is the preferred therapy. Recent trials suggest that, as compared with folfox alone, folfox combined with bevacizumab provides additional survival benefits., Qualifying Statements: The role of radiation therapy, either alone or in combination with chemotherapy, for locally advanced unresectable colorectal cancer is not addressed in this guideline. Use of chronomodulated regimens is a topic that intersects with the use of oxaliplatin/5-fu combinations, particularly chronomodulation of 5-fu in these combinations. Chronomodulation of oxaliplatin has not been extensively studied, and the topic of chronomodulation is beyond the scope of this guideline and is not addressed. Although data exist to support the use of bevacizumab in combination with folfox in second-line treatment, no first-line treatment data are available on which to make a recommendation.

Background: Carcinoma of the esophagus is an aggressive malignancy with an increasing incidence. Its virulence, in terms of symptoms and mortality, justifies a continued search for optimal therapy. A clinical practice guideline was developed based on a systematic review investigating neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapy on resectable thoracic esophageal cancer., Methods: A systematic review with meta-analysis was developed and clinical recommendations were drafted. External review of the practice guideline report by practitioners in Ontario, Canada was obtained through a mailed survey, and incorporated. Final approval of the practice guideline was obtained from the Practice Guidelines Coordinating Committee., Results: The systematic review was developed and recommendations were drafted, and the report was mailed to Ontario practitioners for external review. Ninety percent of respondents agreed with both the evidence summary and the draft recommendations, while only 69% approved of the draft recommendations as a practice guideline. Based on the external review, a revised document was created. The revised practice guideline was submitted to the Practice Guidelines Coordinating Committee for review. All 11 members of the PGCC returned ballots. Eight PGCC members approved the practice guideline report as written and three members approved the guideline conditional on specific concerns being addressed. After these recommended changes were made, the final practice guideline report was approved., Conclusion: In consideration of the systematic review, external review, and subsequent Practice Guidelines Coordinating Committee revision suggestions, and final approval, the Gastrointestinal Cancer Disease Site Group recommends the following:For adult patients with resectable thoracic esophageal cancer for whom surgery is considered appropriate, surgery alone (i.e., without neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapy) is recommended as the standard practice.

Background: Carcinoma of the esophagus is an aggressive malignancy with an increasing incidence. Its virulence, in terms of symptoms and mortality, justifies a continued search for optimal therapy. The large and growing number of patients affected, the high mortality rates, the worldwide geographic variation in practice, and the large body of good quality research warrants a systematic review with meta-analysis., Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis investigating the impact of neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapy on resectable thoracic esophageal cancer to inform evidence-based practice was produced.MEDLINE, CANCERLIT, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and abstracts from the American Society of Clinical Oncology and the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology were searched for trial reports. Included were randomized trials or meta-analyses of neoadjuvant or adjuvant treatments compared with surgery alone or other treatments in patients with resectable thoracic esophageal cancer. Outcomes of interest were survival, adverse effects, and quality of life. Either one- or three-year mortality data were pooled and reported as relative risk ratios., Results: Thirty-four randomized controlled trials and six meta-analyses were obtained and grouped into 13 basic treatment approaches. Single randomized controlled trials detected no differences in mortality between treatments for the following comparisons:- Preoperative radiotherapy versus postoperative radiotherapy.- Preoperative and postoperative radiotherapy versus postoperative radiotherapy. Preoperative and postoperative radiotherapy was associated with a significantly higher mortality rate.- Postoperative chemotherapy versus postoperative radiotherapy.- Postoperative radiotherapy versus postoperative radiotherapy plus protein-bound polysaccharide versus chemoradiation versus chemoradiation plus protein-bound polysaccharide. Pooling one-year mortality detected no statistically significant differences in mortality between treatments for the following comparisons:- Preoperative radiotherapy compared with surgery alone (five randomized trials).- Postoperative radiotherapy compared with surgery alone (five randomized trials).- Preoperative chemotherapy versus surgery alone (six randomized trials).- Preoperative and postoperative chemotherapy versus surgery alone (two randomized trials).- Preoperative chemoradiation therapy versus surgery alone (six randomized trials). Single randomized controlled trials detected differences in mortality between treatments for the following comparison:- Preoperative hyperthermia and chemoradiotherapy versus preoperative chemoradiotherapy in favour of hyperthermia. Pooling three-year mortality detected no statistically significant difference in mortality between treatments for the following comparison:- Postoperative chemotherapy compared with surgery alone (two randomized trials). Pooling three-year mortality detected statistically significant differences between treatments for the following comparisons:- Preoperative chemoradiation therapy versus surgery alone (six randomized trials) in favour of preoperative chemoradiation with surgery.- Preoperative chemotherapy compared with preoperative radiotherapy (one randomized trial) in favour of preoperative radiotherapy., Conclusion: For adult patients with resectable thoracic esophageal cancer for whom surgery is considered appropriate, surgery alone (i.e., without neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapy) is recommended as the standard practice.

Purpose: To make recommendations regarding combined radiotherapy (RT) and chemotherapy (RTCT), compared with RT alone, when a nonsurgical approach is used for patients with localized esophageal carcinoma., Materials and Methods: The Medline, Cancerlit, Cochrane Library databases, and abstracts published in the American Society of Clinical Oncology and the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology proceedings were searched for evidence. Evidence was evaluated by two members of the Gastrointestinal Cancer Disease Site Group and methodologists., Results: Pooling seven randomized trials detected a statistically significant survival benefit at 1 year for concomitant RTCT compared with RT alone (1-year mortality odds ratio 0.61; 95% confidence interval 0.44-0.84; p <0.00001). Local control also significantly improved with concomitant RTCT compared with RT alone for the available data (odds ratio 0.52; 95% confidence interval 0.31-0.89; p = 0.004), but a significant increase in adverse effects, including life-threatening toxicities, was shown., Conclusions: Concomitant RT and cisplatin-based CT is recommended over RT alone. Patients should be aware of the increased acute toxicity associated with this approach, and this recommendation should only be made after consideration of the potential risks and benefits and the patient's general condition. Sequential RTCT is not recommended as standard practice.

Background: Elderly people are prescribed more drugs than younger people. The consequences of excessive or unwise prescribing, such as drug interactions, are well known., Aim: A longitudinal study was undertaken to examine levels and patterns of prescribed drug use among a group of elderly people., Method: Use of prescribed drugs by a sample of elderly people in Nottingham aged 65 years and over was assessed on two occasions four years apart, in 1985 and 1989., Results: Complete drug data were available for 1003 respondents in 1985 and 662 respondents in 1989 (with attrition due mainly to mortality). Drug use increased significantly with age. Women took significantly more drugs than men. Approximately half of respondents were taking at least two drugs. The overall number of drugs per person being taken in 1989 was significantly greater than in 1985. This difference remained significant when age and mortality were controlled, suggesting that changes in drug use over time within this sample may reflect genuine changes in prescribing practice (rather than simply the effects of ageing). The most commonly prescribed drug classes on each occasion were drugs for the cardiovascular system, central nervous system, musculoskeletal system, gastrointestinal tract and respiratory system. The subgroups of drugs most commonly reported at each interview were diuretics, hypnotics and anxiolytics, analgesics and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Drugs within the category 'hypnotics and anxiolytics' showed clear and differential trends over time, with the use of anxiolytics falling, while the use of hypnotics increased. Among those respondents admitted to residential care during the course of the study higher levels of psychotropic drug use, and an increase in antipsychotic medication, were observed., Conclusion: It is important that the drug regimens of elderly people are frequently reviewed to ensure that only the minimum number of effective drugs, in the simplest regimen, are prescribed.

A method for the enantiospecific quantitation of two commonly prescribed non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (ketoprofen and ibuprofen) is described. The method involves formation of a mixed anhydride of the drug with ethylchloroformate and subsequent conversion to an amide by reaction with optically active amphetamine. The subsequently formed diastereomers are separated by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry using selected-ion monitoring. The assay is capable of quantifying ketoprofen (2 ng/ml) and ibuprofen (3 ng/ml) enantiomers from a 200-microliters sample of synovial fluid or plasma and is particularly suitable for protein binding studies.

Objective: To re-assess relationships between mortality, hypnotic use, subjective insomnia, and sleep duration., Design: A prospective study examining 5-year mortality among hypnotic drug users and respondents with subjective insomnia identified in a longitudinal study of health, activity, and lifestyle (Nottingham Longitudinal Study of Activity and Ageing)., Setting: General community., Participants: 1042 survey respondents, aged over 65 years, randomly selected from the community and stratified at age 75 years., Main Outcome Measure: Recorded mortality., Results: During the 5-year period, 352 respondents died. The mortality rate was significantly greater among those taking some form of medication for sleep (n = 208) than for those not taking sleep medication (n = 812; chi-square = 4.91, df = 1, P = 0.027). When sleep medication users were categorized as either "hypnotic users" (ie, users of medication with recognized hypnotic or sedative actions) or "other users" (including analgesics and other over-the-counter medicines), only "other users" showed significant excess mortality (chi-square = 7.27, df = 1, P = 0.007). Logistic regression showed that "other users" were 2.5 times more likely to die than "non-users" even when gender, health risk, and usual sleep duration were controlled. There were no significant relationships between mortality and subjective insomnia or reported duration of sleep., Conclusions: Earlier reported relationships between excess mortality and use of medication for sleep are replicated in this study. Among elderly people, however, this relationship does not derive from the pharmacological characteristics of prescription hypnotics. Rather, it appears that reported self-medication to promote sleep, using a variety of non-sedative products, provides an epidemiological "marker" for a group within which levels of morbidity and mortality are particularly high. Excess mortality associated with very short or long sleep duration was not replicated in this study. Overall, these findings provide little epidemiological support for a wide-spread interaction between benzodiazepine hypnotic use and sleep disordered breathing in old age.

Objective: To gather data on the prescribing of psychoactive drugs (benzodiazepines, antidepressants and antipsychotics) using a network of Tasmanian community pharmacies., Design Setting and Participants: The prescribing of psychoactive drugs in the community was studied during 1989 using data retrospectively obtained from computerised dispensing systems in 11 community pharmacies in Tasmania. The data collection procedure included all prescriptions dispensed in the pharmacies, irrespective of supply under the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme, the Repatriation Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme or as a private prescription., Main Outcome Measures: Results of the pooled data were quantified by both the number of prescriptions and the defined daily doses (DDDs) dispensed for the psychoactive drugs., Results: When extrapolated to the population of Tasmania, the estimated annual prescribing rates for the benzodiazepines, antidepressants and antipsychotics (including lithium) were 853.3, 316.2 and 54.8 prescriptions per 1000 persons, respectively. Prescriptions for the psychoactive drugs accounted for 13.2% of all prescriptions dispensed. In terms of DDDs, the estimated prescribing rates for the total Tasmanian population for the benzodiazepines, antidepressants and antipsychotics were 47.8, 12.5 and 2.1 DDDs per 1000 persons per day, respectively. The rate of benzodiazepine prescribing appeared to be high in comparison with the limited Australian data available. The relative prescribing rates of the long acting benzodiazepine hypnotics, flunitrazepam and nitrazepam, were also disturbingly high., Conclusions: This study has demonstrated the potential value of comprehensive pharmacoepidemiological data obtained from a network of community pharmacists and will form the basis for future studies using an expanded collection procedure.

The effects of posture and sleep on the pharmacokinetics of paracetamol (acetaminophen) 500 mg and its metabolites were studied in 8 healthy men. The mean residence times for paracetamol or its metabolites were significantly altered by change in posture or by sleep, whereas other pharmacokinetic parameters were unchanged. The change in mean residence time is consistent with a faster absorption of paracetamol during ambulation. The present data suggest that the proposed posture-related changes in volume of distribution do not exist, and that there is no pharmacokinetic basis for a headache being relieved by taking paracetamol and lying down.

1. The effects of chronic administration of aspirin in therapeutic doses (3.9 g/day) on plasma and salivary salicylate levels were studied in eight subjects. 2. The urinary excretion profile for free salicylic acid and metabolites of salicylate were examined. 3. Plasma and salivary salicylate levels declined significantly after peak levels were achieved between days 3 and 10. 4. The decline in plasma and salivary salicylate levels may be due to an induction of a metabolic pathway such as salicylurate formation (Furst, Gupta & Paulus, 1977). Only the mean fraction of salicylate excreted as salicylurate appears to increase with time during the present study, although the change was not significant statistically. 5. The decline in plasma and salivary salicylate levels during chronic therapy may lead to an apparent 'tolerance' of some rheumatoid patients to aspirin.