101. Provider Survey on Automated Clinical Decision Support for Cardiovascular Risk Assessment
- Author
-
Hongfang Liu, Jane L. Shellum, Rajeev Chaudhry, Rick A. Nishimura, Adelaide M. Arruda-Olson, Francisco Lopez-Jimenez, Sujith Samudrala, and Alisha P. Chaudhry
- Subjects
lcsh:R5-920 ,CDS, clinical decision support ,business.industry ,CV, cardiovascular ,030204 cardiovascular system & hematology ,medicine.disease ,Clinical decision support system ,Risk profile ,3. Good health ,Clinical Practice ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Overall response rate ,Electronic health record ,Patient information ,EHR, electronic health record ,medicine ,Original Article ,030212 general & internal medicine ,Medical emergency ,Risk assessment ,business ,lcsh:Medicine (General) - Abstract
Objective To investigate provider opinions regarding a clinical decision support (CDS) system for cardiovascular risk assessment and for the creation of a replacement system. Methods From March to April 2018, an invitation letter with a link to a self-administered web-based survey was sent via e-mail to 279 providers with primary appointment in the Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester. The e-mail was sent to providers on March 8, 2018 and the survey closed on April 16, 2018. Results One hundred providers responded to the survey yielding an overall response rate of 35.8%. Of these, 52 (52%) indicated they had used the cardiovascular (CV) risk profile CDS system and were classified as users and prompted to continue the survey. Among users, 42 (80.8%) indicated use of the CDS was either important (25; 48.1%) or very important (17; 32.7%) in their clinical practice; 45 (86.5%) responded that the system was very easy (17; 32.7%) or easy (28; 53.8%) to use. In addition, 48 (96.0%) users indicated that the CV risk profile supported their thought process at the point-of-care; 47 (97.9%) users indicated similar functionalities should be implemented into the new electronic health record system and 41 (85.4%) users reported new functionalities should also be incorporated. Conclusions For most users, the CDS system was easy to use and supported clinical thought process at the point-of-care. Users also felt their practice was supported and should continue to be supported by CDS systems providing individualized patient information at the point-of-care.
- Published
- 2019