Search

Background: Proteochemometrics is a new methodology that allows prediction of protein function directly from real interaction measurement data without the need of 3D structure information. Several reported proteochemometric models of ligand-receptor interactions have already yielded significant insights into various forms of bio-molecular interactions. The proteochemometric models are multivariate regression models that predict binding affinity for a particular combination of features of the ligand and protein. Although proteochemometric models have already offered interesting results in various studies, no detailed statistical evaluation of their average predictive power has been performed. In particular, variable subset selection performed to date has always relied on using all available examples, a situation also encountered in microarray gene expression data analysis., Results: A methodology for an unbiased evaluation of the predictive power of proteochemometric models was implemented and results from applying it to two of the largest proteochemometric data sets yet reported are presented. A double cross-validation loop procedure is used to estimate the expected performance of a given design method. The unbiased performance estimates (P2) obtained for the data sets that we consider confirm that properly designed single proteochemometric models have useful predictive power, but that a standard design based on cross validation may yield models with quite limited performance. The results also show that different commercial software packages employed for the design of proteochemometric models may yield very different and therefore misleading performance estimates. In addition, the differences in the models obtained in the double CV loop indicate that detailed chemical interpretation of a single proteochemometric model is uncertain when data sets are small., Conclusion: The double CV loop employed offer unbiased performance estimates about a given proteochemometric modelling procedure, making it possible to identify cases where the proteochemometric design does not result in useful predictive models. Chemical interpretations of single proteochemometric models are uncertain and should instead be based on all the models selected in the double CV loop employed here.

1. Both in mammalian tissues and in transfected cells, only low levels of alpha1D-adrenoceptors are detected in radioligand binding studies. It has been implicated that the comparatively long N-terminal tail of the alpha1D-adrenoceptor is responsible for the inefficient surface expression of the receptor. 2. In the present study, we created gene constructs for six N-terminally truncated variants of the human alpha1D-adrenoceptor. These constructs were used to transfect Neuro2A cells. We show that the density of alpha1D-adrenoceptors, observed by [3H]-prazosin binding, gradually increased with longer truncations of the N-terminus. This seems to indicate that the long N-terminal tail nonspecifically interferes with receptor translocation to the plasma membrane. 3. The addition of a 16 amino acids long signal peptide to the N-terminus of the wild-type alpha1D-adrenoceptor increased the density of receptor binding sites 10-fold in Neuro2A and COS-7 cells. This indicates that, after the addition of a signal peptide, the long N-terminal tail of the alpha1D-adrenoceptor does not interfere with proper translocation of the receptor to the plasma membrane. This, in turn, indicates that the N-terminal tail of the wild-type alpha1D-adrenoceptor, merely by its long length, hinders the first transmembrane helix of the receptor from being a signal anchor. 4. Neither the wild-type alpha1D-adrenoceptor (for which the expression level of [3H]-prazosin binding sites is low) nor the truncated alpha1D-adrenoceptor variant (for which the expression level of [3H]-prazosin binding sites is high) showed any constitutive activity in stimulating inositol phosphate accumulation. This indicates that the low expression level of [3H]-prazosin binding sites, after transfection with the wild-type alpha1D-adrenoceptor, is not caused by constitutive activity of the receptor and subsequent receptor downregulation.

In this paper, we describe homology modeling of the alpha1A receptor based on the X-ray structure of bovine rhodopsin. The protein model has been generated by applying ligand-supported homology modeling, using mutational and ligand SAR data to guide the protein modeling procedure. We performed a virtual screening of the company's compound collection to test how well this model is suited to identify alpha1A antagonists. We applied a hierarchical virtual screening procedure guided by 2D filters and three-dimensional pharmacophore models. The ca. 23,000 filtered compounds were docked into the alpha1A homology model with GOLD and scored with PMF. From the top-ranked compounds, 80 diverse compounds were tested in a radioligand displacement assay. 37 compounds revealed K(i) values better than 10 microM; the most active compound binds with 1.4 nM to the alpha1A receptor. Our findings suggest that rhodopsin-based homology models may be used as the structural basis for GPCR lead finding and compound optimization.

It is now well established that rhodopsin-like, family-A G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) can exist within homo- and heterodimeric/oligomeric complexes. However, limited information is currently available on the molecular basis of these interactions or their selectivity. Using the alpha1-adrenoceptor family as a model, this has been examined using assays including coimmunoprecipitation, saturation bioluminescence resonance energy transfer (BRET), time-resolved fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET), and bimolecular fluorescence complementation. We demonstrate key roles for transmembrane helices I and IV in homodimeric/oligomeric interactions of the alpha1b-adrenoceptor and suggest that other interactions indicate that this GPCR can exist as a higher-order oligomeric complex. Literature reports on heterodimerization between chemokine receptor family members and the effects or otherwise of agonist ligands are complex. It was recently indicated that although the CXCR2 receptor is able to homodimerize, this is not the case for the closely related CXCR1 receptor and that these two GPCRs do not heterodimerize. We have reinvestigated these issues using combinations of coimmunoprecipitation, saturation BRET, and a novel endoplasmic reticulum-trapping strategy. Unlike the previous report, we demonstrate that CXCR1 is able to both homodimerize and heterodimerize with the CXCR2 receptor and that the relative affinity of these interactions suggests that with coexpression of these two GPCRs a random mixture of homo- and heterodimers will be present.

A number of subtypes of the alpha-adrenoceptor have been identified; however, knowledge of the three-dimensional structures of such membrane proteins is limited, and no crystal structure of an alpha-adrenoceptor is available to date. We have developed and analysed homology models of the alpha1A-adrenoceptor subtype based on the bovine rhodopsin crystal structure (1l9 h). Subsequent structural refinement was performed through molecular dynamics simulations using the Amber 7 suite of programs with a biphasic H2O/CHCl3/H2O cell utilised to mimic the receptor's natural membrane environment.

Three distinct genes encode alpha(1)-adrenoceptors. Although homodimers of each subtype have been reported, certain but not all combinations of heterodimers of the alpha(1)-adrenoceptors appear to form. Key studies in this field are reviewed and the approaches that have been applied to monitoring the selectivity and the basis of alpha(1)-adrenoceptor dimerization are discussed.

Combinations of coimmunoprecipitation, single-cell fluorescence resonance energy transfer, and cell-surface time-resolved fluorescence resonance energy transfer demonstrated protein-protein interactions and quaternary structure for the alpha(1b)-adrenoceptor. Self-association of transmembrane domain 1 and its interaction with the full-length receptor indicated a symmetrical interface provided by this domain. Lack of effect of mutation of the glycophorin-A dimerization-like region within this helix demonstrated that this did not provide the molecular mechanism. Multiple interactions were observed between the alpha(1b)-adrenoceptor and fragments derived from its sequence. Fragments comprising transmembrane domains 3 and 4 and transmembrane domains 5 and 6, but not transmembrane domain 7, were also able to interact with the full-length receptor. Transmembrane domain 7 failed to interact significantly with any element of the receptor and was not transported to the cell surface after coexpression with the full-length receptor. Symmetrical interactions were also noted between fragments incorporating transmembrane domain 4, but this segment of the receptor failed to interact with transmembrane domains 1 and 2 or transmembrane domains 5 and 6. Time-resolved fluorescence resonance energy transfer studies were also consistent with contributions of transmembrane domains 1 and/or 2 and transmembrane domains 3 and/or 4 to protein-protein interactions within the quaternary structure of the alpha(1b)-adrenoceptor, and with a contribution of transmembrane domains 5 and/or 6. These data are consistent with a complex oligomeric quaternary structure of the alpha(1b)-adrenoceptor in which major, symmetrical interactions may define intradimeric contacts with other contributions, providing interdimer contacts to generate oligomeric complexes akin to those observed for murine rhodopsin. A model derived from this was developed.

The recent availability of crystal structure of bovine rhodopsin offers new opportunities in order to approach the construction of G protein coupled receptors. This study focuses the attention on the modeling of full-length alpha(1a) adrenergic receptor (alpha(1a)-AR) due to its biological role and significant implications in pharmacological treatment of benign prostate hyperplasia. This work could be considered made up by two main steps: (a) the construction of full structure of alpha(1a)-AR, through homology modeling methods; (b) the automated docking of an endogenous agonist, norepinephrine, and of an antagonist, WB-4101, using BioDock program. The obtained results highlight the key residues involved in binding sites of both agonists and antagonists, confirming the mutagenesis data and giving new suggestions for the rational design of selective ligands.

In the present study, more than 75 compounds structurally related to BMY 7378 have been designed and synthesized. Structural variations of each part of the reference molecule have been introduced, obtaining highly selective ligands for the alpha(1d) adrenergic receptor. The molecular determinants for selectivity at this receptor are essentially held by the phenyl substituent in the phenylpiperazine moiety. The integration of an extensive SAR analysis with docking simulations using the rhodopsin-based models of the three alpha(1)-AR subtypes and of the 5-HT(1A) receptor provides significant insights into the characterization of the receptor binding sites as well as into the molecular determinants of ligand selectivity at the alpha(1d)-AR and the 5-HT(1A) receptors. The results of multiple copies simultaneous search (MCSS) on the substituted phenylpiperazines together with those of manual docking of compounds BMY 7378 and 69 into the putative binding sites of the alpha(1a)-AR, alpha(1b)-AR, alpha(1d)-AR, and the 5-HT(1A) receptors suggest that the phenylpiperazine moiety would dock into a site formed by amino acids in helices 3, 4, 5, 6 and extracellular loop 2 (E2), whereas the spirocyclic ring of the ligand docks into a site formed by amino acids of helices 1, 2, 3, and 7. This docking mode is consistent with the SAR data produced in this work. Furthermore, the binding site of the imide moiety does not allow for the simultaneous involvement of the two carbonyl oxygen atoms in H-bonding interactions, consistent with the SAR data, in particular with the results obtained with the lactam derivative 128. The results of docking simulations also suggest that the second and third extracellular loops may act as selectivity filters for the substituted phenylpiperazines. The most potent and selective compounds for alpha(1d) adrenergic receptor, i.e., 69 (Rec 26D/038) and 128 (Rec 26D/073), are characterized by the presence of the 2,5-dichlorophenylpiperazine moiety.

We combined biophysical, biochemical, and pharmacological approaches to investigate the ability of the alpha 1a- and alpha 1b-adrenergic receptor (AR) subtypes to form homo- and hetero-oligomers. Receptors tagged with different epitopes (hemagglutinin and Myc) or fluorescent proteins (cyan and green fluorescent proteins) were transiently expressed in HEK-293 cells either individually or in different combinations. Fluorescence resonance energy transfer measurements provided evidence that both the alpha 1a- and alpha 1b-AR can form homo-oligomers with similar transfer efficiency of approximately 0.10. Hetero-oligomers could also be observed between the alpha 1b- and the alpha 1a-AR subtypes but not between the alpha 1b-AR and the beta2-AR, the NK1 tachykinin, or the CCR5 chemokine receptors. Oligomerization of the alpha 1b-AR did not require the integrity of its C-tail, of two glycophorin motifs, or of the N-linked glycosylation sites at its N terminus. In contrast, helix I and, to a lesser extent, helix VII were found to play a role in the alpha 1b-AR homo-oligomerization. Receptor oligomerization was not influenced by the agonist epinephrine or by the inverse agonist prazosin. A constitutively active (A293E) as well as a signaling-deficient (R143E) mutant displayed oligomerization features similar to those of the wild type alpha 1b-AR. Confocal imaging revealed that oligomerization of the alpha1-AR subtypes correlated with their ability to co-internalize upon exposure to the agonist. The alpha 1a-selective agonist oxymetazoline induced the co-internalization of the alpha 1a- and alpha 1b-AR, whereas the alpha 1b-AR could not co-internalize with the NK1 tachykinin or CCR5 chemokine receptors. Oligomerization might therefore represent an additional mechanism regulating the physiological responses mediated by the alpha 1a- and alpha 1b-AR subtypes.

A peptide contained in the venom of the predatory marine snail Conus tulipa, rho-TIA, has previously been shown to possess alpha1-adrenoreceptor antagonist activity. Here, we further characterize its pharmacological activity as well as its structure-activity relationships. In the isolated rat vas deferens, rho-TIA inhibited alpha1-adrenoreceptor-mediated increases in cytosolic Ca2+ concentration that were triggered by norepinephrine, but did not affect presynaptic alpha2-adrenoreceptor-mediated responses. In radioligand binding assays using [125I]HEAT, rho-TIA displayed slightly greater potency at the alpha 1B than at the alpha 1A or alpha 1D subtypes. Moreover, although it did not affect the rate of association for [3H]prazosin binding to the alpha 1B-adrenoreceptor, the dissociation rate was increased, indicating non-competitive antagonism by rho-TIA. N-terminally truncated analogs of rho-TIA were less active than the full-length peptide, with a large decline in activity observed upon removal of the fourth residue of rho-TIA (Arg4). An alanine walk of rho-TIA confirmed the importance of Arg4 for activity and revealed a number of other residues clustered around Arg4 that contribute to the potency of rho-TIA. The unique allosteric antagonism of rho-TIA resulting from its interaction with receptor residues that constitute a binding site that is distinct from that of the classical competitive alpha1-adrenoreceptor antagonists may allow the development of inhibitors that are highly subtype selective.

QSAR models represent the relationship of biological activity with either physicochemical parameters or structural indices. QSAR study was performed on some arylpiperazines as 5-HT(1A)/alpha(1)-adrenergic receptor antagonists using E-state indices to identify the pharmacophoric requirements. It was found that some of the atoms played important roles to both activities and some played important role in selectivity of compound to the 5-HT(1A) antagonistic activity. The presence of COONHPr group at the ortho-position of the phenyl ring might be disadvantageous and Br at meta-position might be conducive to the activity. COOPr at the ortho-position might be disfavored the adrenergic alpha(1)-antagonistic activity, thus increase the selectivity.

Purpose: Human prostate contains alpha-1 adrenergic, cholinergic and nonadrenergic noncholinergic neuroreceptors. Using agonistic and antagonistic agents at these neuroreceptors we studied the resultant contractile responses in isolated human prostate., Materials and Methods: Human prostate tissue was obtained at prostatectomy for benign prostatic hyperplasia in 37 adult male patients. Tissues were suspended in tissue bath chambers connected to force displacement transducers. Specimens were subjected to agonist induced contractions, the first always being norepinephrine (NE). Specimens were pretreated with antagonist (adrenergic, cholinergic, nonadrenergic noncholinergic or none if control), followed by contraction with a second agonist (NE or other). Contractile tensions were recorded on a polygraph and then statistically analyzed., Results: The order of highest to lowest agonist induced tensile forces was NE, dopamine, acetylcholine, bethanechol, histamine and serotonin. Excitatory concentration EC(50) values were determined for each agonist tested. Significant differences were found between specific alpha-1 adrenergic receptor blockers (terazosin, prazosin and the experimental drug LY253352). In addition, many other agents antagonized the alpha-1 adrenergic receptor. Inhibitory concentration IC(50) values were obtained and the order of alpha-1 adrenergic antagonistic strengths from strongest to weakest was LY253352, prazosin, terazosin, ketanserin, SCH23390, diphenhydramine, DO710, dopamine, serotonin and histamine., Conclusions: Human prostate neuroreceptors were determined to be alpha-1 adrenergic, dopaminergic, muscarinic cholinergic, 2A serotonergic and H1 histaminergic. Dopamine, serotonin, histamine and their antagonists blocked the adrenergic response, indicating possible receptor-receptor interaction. Further study of the pharmacology of human prostate would likely identify new drugs for treating patients with bladder outlet obstruction due to benign prostatic hyperplasia.

Using the yeast two-hybrid system, we identified the mu 2 subunit of the clathrin adaptor complex 2 as a protein interacting with the C-tail of the alpha 1b-adrenergic receptor (AR). Direct association between the alpha 1b-AR and mu 2 was demonstrated using a solid phase overlay assay. The alpha 1b-AR/mu 2 interaction occurred inside the cells, as shown by the finding that the transfected alpha 1b-AR and the endogenous mu 2 could be coimmunoprecipitated from HEK-293 cell extracts. Mutational analysis of the alpha 1b-AR revealed that the binding site for mu 2 does not involve canonical YXX Phi or dileucine motifs but a stretch of eight arginines on the receptor C-tail. The binding domain of mu 2 for the receptor C-tail involves both its N terminus and the subdomain B of its C-terminal portion. The alpha 1b-AR specifically interacted with mu 2, but not with the mu 1, mu 3, or mu 4 subunits belonging to other AP complexes. The deletion of the mu 2 binding site in the C-tail markedly decreased agonist-induced receptor internalization as demonstrated by confocal microscopy as well as by the results of a surface receptor biotinylation assay. The direct association of the adaptor complex 2 with a G protein-coupled receptor has not been reported so far and might represent a common mechanism underlying clathrin-mediated receptor endocytosis.

Recent studies reveal important and distinct roles for cardiac alpha(1a) adrenergic receptors (alpha(1a)ARs). Surprisingly, given their importance in myocardial ischemia/reperfusion, hypoxia, and hypertrophy as well as frequent use of rat cardiomyocyte model systems, the rat alpha(1a)AR gene promoter has never been characterized. Therefore, we isolated 3.9 kb of rat alpha(1a)AR 5'-untranslated region and 5'-regulatory sequences and identified multiple transcription initiation sites. One proximal (P1) and several clustered upstream distal promoters (P2, P3, and P4) were delineated. Sequences surrounding both proximal and distal promoters lack typical TATA or CCAAT boxes but contain cis-elements for multiple myocardium-relevant nuclear regulators including Sp1, GATA, and CREB, findings consistent with enhanced cardiac basal alpha(1a)AR expression seen in Northern blots and reporter constructs. Promoter analysis using deletion reporter constructs reveals, in addition to a powerful upstream enhancer, a key region (-558/-542) important in regulating all alpha(1a)AR promoters with hypoxic stress. Gel shift analysis of this 14-bp region confirms a hypoxia-induced shift independent of direct hypoxia-inducible factor binding. Mutational analysis of this sequence identifies a novel 9-bp hypoxia response element, the loss of which severely attenuates hypoxia-mediated repression of alpha(1a)AR transcription. These findings for the alpha(1a) gene should facilitate elucidation of alpha(1)AR-mediated mechanisms involved in distinct myocardial pathologies.

We have established that differing effects of alpha1-adrenergic receptor (AR) subtypes on cell proliferation are due to differential coupling to the Gs/cAMP pathway; thus, both alpha1A- and alpha1B-ARs couple to Gs, while alpha1D-AR does not. To identify the region responsible for this difference in subtype-specific Gs coupling, we constructed a series of chimeric and a set of point-mutated human alpha1A- and alpha1D-ARs, and examined their signaling ability. Here, we show that the amino acid residues Thr 136 and Val138 in the intracellular loop II of the human alpha1A-AR are intimately involved with Gs coupling.

Background: The C-terminal four amino acids (GEEV) of human alpha1A-adrenergic receptors (ARs) have been reported to interact with the PDZ domain of neuronal nitric oxide synthase (nNOS) in a yeast two-hybrid system. The other two alpha1-AR subtypes have no sequence homology in this region, raising the possibility of subtype-specific protein-protein interactions., Results: We used co-immunoprecipitation and functional approaches with epitope-tagged alpha1-ARs to examine this interaction and the importance of the C-terminal tail. Following co-transfection of HEK-293 cells with hexahistidine/Flag (HF)-tagged alpha1A-ARs and nNOS, membranes were solubilized and immunoprecipitated with anti-FLAG affinity resin or anti-nNOS antibodies. Immunoprecipitation of HFalpha1A-ARs resulted in co-immunoprecipitation of nNOS and vice versa, confirming that these proteins interact. However, nNOS also co-immunoprecipitated with HFalpha1B- and HFalpha1D-ARs, suggesting that the interaction is not specific to the alpha1A subtype. In addition, nNOS co-immunoprecipitated with each of the three HFalpha1-AR subtypes which had been C-terminally truncated, suggesting that this interaction does not require the C-tails; and with Flag-tagged beta1- and beta2-ARs. Treatment of PC12 cells expressing HFalpha1A-ARs with an inhibitor of nitric oxide formation did not alter norepinephrine-mediated activation of mitogen activated protein kinases, suggesting nNOS is not involved in this response., Conclusions: These results show that nNOS does interact with full-length alpha1A-ARs, but that this interaction is not subtype-specific and does not require the C-terminal tail, raising questions about its functional significance.

Co-expression of the alpha(1b)-adrenoreceptor and Galpha(11) in cells derived from a Galpha(q)/Galpha(11) knock-out mouse allows agonist-mediated elevation of intracellular Ca(2+) levels that is transduced by beta/gamma released from the G protein alpha subunit. Mutation of Tyr(356) of Galpha(11) to Phe, within a receptor contact domain, had little effect on function but this was reduced greatly by alteration to Ser and virtually eliminated by conversion to Asp. This pattern was replicated following incorporation of each form of Galpha(11) into fusion proteins with the alpha(1b)-adrenoreceptor. Following a [(35)S]guanosine 5'-O-(3-thiotriphosphate) (GTPgammaS) binding assay, immunoprecipitation of the wild type alpha(1b)-adrenoreceptor-Galpha(11) fusion protein indicated that the agonist phenylephrine stimulated guanine nucleotide exchange on Galpha(11) more than 30-fold. Information transfer by agonist was controlled in residue 356 Galpha(11) mutants with rank order Tyr > Phe > Trp > Ile > Ala = Gln = Arg > Ser > Asp, although these alterations did not alter the binding affinity of either phenylephrine or an antagonist ligand. Mutation of a beta/gamma contact interface in the alpha(1b)-adrenoreceptor-Tyr(356) Galpha(11) fusion protein did not alter ligand binding affinity but did reduce greatly beta/gamma binding and phenylephrine stimulation of [(35)S]GTPgammaS binding. It also prevented agonist elevation of intracellular Ca(2+) levels, as did a mutation in Galpha(11) that prevents G protein subunit dissociation. These results indicate that a bulky aromatic group is required four amino acids from the C terminus of Galpha(11) to maximize information transfer from an agonist-occupied receptor and disprove the hypothesis that tyrosine phosphorylation of this residue is required for G protein activation (Umemori, H., Inoue, T., Kume, S., Sekiyama, N., Nagao, M., Itoh, H., Nakanishi, S., Mikoshiba, K., and Yamamoto, T. (1997) Science 276, 1878-1881). This is distinct from Galpha(i1), where hydrophobicity of the amino acid is the key determinant at this location. They also further demonstrate a key role for the beta/gamma complex in enhancing receptor to G protein alpha subunit information transfer.

Computer simulations on a new model of the alpha1b-adrenergic receptor based on the crystal structure of rhodopsin have been combined with experimental mutagenesis to investigate the role of residues in the cytosolic half of helix 6 in receptor activation. Our results support the hypothesis that a salt bridge between the highly conserved arginine (R143(3.50)) of the E/DRY motif of helix 3 and a conserved glutamate (E289(6.30)) on helix 6 constrains the alpha1b-AR in the inactive state. In fact, mutations of E289(6.30) that weakened the R143(3.50)-E289(6.30) interaction constitutively activated the receptor. The functional effect of mutating other amino acids on helix 6 (F286(6.27), A292(6.33), L296(6.37), V299(6.40,) V300(6.41), and F303(6.44)) correlates with the extent of their interaction with helix 3 and in particular with R143(3.50) of the E/DRY sequence.

Despite important roles in myocardial hypertrophy and benign prostatic hyperplasia, little is known about acute effects of agonist stimulation on alpha(1a)-adrenergic receptor (alpha(1a)AR) signaling and function. Regulatory mechanisms are likely complex since 12 distinct human alpha(1a)AR carboxyl-terminal splice variants have been isolated. After determining the predominance of the alpha(1a-1)AR isoform in human heart and prostate, we stably expressed an epitope-tagged alpha(1a-1)AR cDNA in rat-1 fibroblasts and subsequently examined regulation of signaling, phosphorylation, and internalization of the receptor. Human alpha(1a)AR-mediated inositol phosphate signaling is acutely desensitized in response to both agonist and phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA) exposure. Concurrent with desensitization, alpha(1a)ARs in (32)P(i)-labeled cells are rapidly phosphorylated in response to both NE and PMA stimulation. Despite the ability of PKC to desensitize alpha(1a)ARs when directly activated with PMA, inhibitors of PKC have no effect on agonist-mediated desensitization. In contrast, involvement of GRK kinases is suggested by the ability of GRK2 to desensitize alpha(1a)ARs. Internalization of cell surface alpha(1a)ARs also occurs in response to agonist stimulation (but not PKC activation), but is initiated more slowly than receptor desensitization. Significantly, deletion of the alpha(1a)AR carboxyl terminus has no effect on receptor internalization or either agonist-induced or GRK-mediated receptor desensitization. Because mechanisms underlying acute agonist-mediated regulation of human alpha(1a)ARs are primarily independent of the carboxyl terminus, they may be common to all functional alpha(1a)AR isoforms.

We showed previously that Phe(303) in transmembrane segment (TM) VI of the alpha(1B)-adrenergic receptor, a highly conserved residue in G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), is critically involved in receptor-activation and G-protein-coupling [Chen, S. H., Lin, F., Xu, M., Hwa, J., and Graham, R. M. (2000) EMBO J. 19, 4265-4271]. Here, we show that saturation mutagenesis of Phe(303) results in a series of mutants with different levels of constitutive activity for inositol phosphate (IP) signaling. Mutants F303G and F303N showed neither basal nor agonist-stimulated IP turnover, whereas F303A displayed increased basal activity but an attenuated maximal response to (-)-epinephrine-stimulation. F303L, on the other hand, showed all features of a typical constitutively active GPCR with markedly increased basal activity and increased potency and efficacy of agonist-stimulated IP signaling. All mutants displayed higher agonist-binding affinities than the wild-type receptor, and by thermal stability studies, those able to signal showed increased susceptibility to inactivation with an order of sensitivity (F303L > F303A > WT) directly related to their degree of constitutive activity. Using the substituted cysteine accessibility method (SCAM) and equilibrium binding studies, we further show that the F303A and F303L mutants result in TM helical movements that differ in accordance with their degree of constitutive activity. These findings, therefore, confirm and extend our previous data implicating Phe(303) as a key residue coupling TM helical movements to G-protein-activation.

To investigate their role in receptor coupling to G(q), we mutated all basic amino acids and some conserved hydrophobic residues of the cytosolic surface of the alpha(1b)-adrenergic receptor (AR). The wild type and mutated receptors were expressed in COS-7 cells and characterized for their ligand binding properties and ability to increase inositol phosphate accumulation. The experimental results have been interpreted in the context of both an ab initio model of the alpha(1b)-AR and of a new homology model built on the recently solved crystal structure of rhodopsin. Among the twenty-three basic amino acids mutated only mutations of three, Arg(254) and Lys(258) in the third intracellular loop and Lys(291) at the cytosolic extension of helix 6, markedly impaired the receptor-mediated inositol phosphate production. Additionally, mutations of two conserved hydrophobic residues, Val(147) and Leu(151) in the second intracellular loop had significant effects on receptor function. The functional analysis of the receptor mutants in conjunction with the predictions of molecular modeling supports the hypothesis that Arg(254), Lys(258), as well as Leu(151) are directly involved in receptor-G protein interaction and/or receptor-mediated activation of the G protein. In contrast, the residues belonging to the cytosolic extensions of helices 3 and 6 play a predominant role in the activation process of the alpha(1b)-AR. These findings contribute to the delineation of the molecular determinants of the alpha(1b)-AR/G(q) interface.

The adrenergic receptors play a key role in the modulation of sympathetic nervous system activity as well as a site of action for many therapeutic agents. The alpha1-adrenergic receptor subtypes (alpha1A-, alpha1B-, alpha1D) are the prime mediators of smooth muscle contraction and hypertrophic growth, but their characterization in both binding and function have lagged the other adrenergic family members. Although they are derived from a related ancestral gene and all nine adrenergic receptor family members bind the endogenous ligands, epinephrine and norepinephrine, with roughly similar affinities, there are major differences in the mode of binding, second messenger utilization, and physiological effects of the alpha1-subtypes compared with beta- or alpha2-subtypes. Here, we review the recent literature on aspects of its binding pocket and how it differs from the beta-adrenergic receptor paradigms. We also review the signaling components and aspects of its function and provide new insights into its roles in smooth muscle, growth, neurological, and cardiovascular function.

This study reports the building of the three-dimensional structure of the rat alpha1d-adrenergic receptor through a topology approach based on the structure of the rhodopsin receptor from cryoelectron microscopy. The validity and reliability of the receptor model were assessed through exhaustive molecular dynamics and docking studies. Some interesting ligand-receptor interactions were identified along with significant differences between the binding mode of agonists and antagonists. The importance of the disruption of a salt bridge as a possible initial event leading to receptor activation is discussed on the basis of data from mutagenesis and molecular dynamics studies., (Copyright 2001 Wiley-Liss, Inc.)

An area of continuing interest in medicinal chemistry is the design, synthesis and pharmacological evaluation of ligands which bind at adrenoceptor subtypes, which include alpha(1A), alpha(1B), alpha(1D); alpha(2A), alpha(2B), alpha(2C); beta(1), beta(2), beta(3) and possibly beta(4) subtypes. The selective blockade or stimulation of these receptor subtypes is of on-going pharmacological and medicinal interest. However, the design principles for ligand differentiation at these subtypes still need further development. This review focuses on alpha(1) adrenoceptors with a concentration on literature over the past five years. Structural, physiological and therapeutic aspects of the alpha(1A), alpha(1B) and alpha(1D) subtypes are discussed together with ligands binding to these receptor subtypes. Approaches to alpha(1) adrenoceptor ligand design based on known ligands and on receptor docking are evaluated. A new combined approach using pharmacophores and receptor docking affords possibilities for deeper insights into achieving small molecule binding selectivity.

A classical quantitative structure-activity relationship (Hansch) study and artificial neural networks (ANNs) have been applied to a training set of 32 substituted phenylpiperazines with affinity for 5-HT(1A) and alpha(1)-adrenergic receptors, to evaluate the structural requirements that are responsible for 5-HT(1A)/alpha(1) selectivity. The resulting models provide a significant correlation of electronic, steric, and hydrophobic parameters with the biological affinities. Although the derived linear Hansch correlations give good statistics and acceptable predictions, the introduction of nonlinear relationships in the analysis gives more solid models and more accurate predictions. In the ANN models on the basis of the obtained 3D plots, the 5-HT(1A) affinity has a nonlinear dependence on F, V(o), V(m), and pi(o), although the nonlinear relationship is not far from a planar one. The alpha(1)-adrenergic receptor affinity has a clear nonlinear dependence on F, V(o), V(m), pi(o), and pi(m). A comparison of both analyses gives an additional understanding for 5-HT(1A)/alpha(1) selectivity: (a) high F values increase the binding affinity for 5-HT(1A) receptors and decrease the affinity for alpha(1) sites; (b) the hydrophobicity at the meta-position has only influence for the alpha(1)-adrenergic receptor; (c) the meta-position seems to be implicated in the 5-HT(1A)/alpha(1) selectivity. While the 5-HT(1A) receptor is able to accommodate bulky substituents in the region of its active site, the steric requirements of the alpha(1)-adrenergic receptor at this position are more restricted. This information was used for the design of the new ligand EF-7412 (33) (5-HT(1A): K(i exptl) = 27 nM, alpha(1): K(i exptl) > 1000 nM; 5-HT(1A): K(i pred) (ANN) = 36 nM, alpha(1): K(i pred ANN) = 2745 nM) which was characterized as an antagonist in vivo in pre- and postsynaptic 5-HT(1A)R sites. Computational simulations of the complex between EF-7412 (33) and a 3D model of the transmembrane domain of the 5-HT(1A) receptor allowed us to define the molecular details of the ligand-receptor interaction that includes: (i) the ionic interaction between the protonated amine of the ligand and Asp 3.32; (ii) the hydrogen bonds between the m-NHSO(2)Et group of the ligand and Asn 7.39; and the hydrogen bonds between the hydantoin moiety of the ligand and (iii) Thr 3.37, (iv) Ser 5.42, and (v) Thr 5.43. These QSAR and ANN results in combination with computational simulations of ligand recognition will be useful for the design of potent selective 5-HT(1A) ligands.

alpha(1)-adrenergic receptors (alpha(1)-ARs) are members of the G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) superfamily and activate inositol phosphate (IP) turnover. We show that glycine and asparagine mutations of Phe303 in transmembrane segment VI (TMVI) of the alpha(1B)-AR, a highly conserved residue in GPCRs, although increasing agonist affinity, abolish agonist-activated IP signalling. Co-expression of the Phe303 mutants also inhibited (-)epinephrine-stimulated IP signalling by wild-type alpha(1B)-AR and other G(q)-coupled receptors, as well as IP signalling mediated by AlF(4)(-) stimulation of both wild-type G(q alpha) and a constitutively active mutant. The inability of the Phe303 mutants to signal is due to induction of a receptor conformation that dissociates G-protein binding from activation. As a result, the Phe303 mutants sequester G(q alpha) and stoichiometrically inhibit Gq signalling in a dominant-negative manner. We further show that both the enhanced basal and agonist-stimulated IP-signalling activity of the constitutively active alpha(1B)-AR mutants, C128F and A293E, are inhibited in the double mutants, C128F/F303G and A293E/F303G. Phe303, therefore, appears to be critically involved in coupling TMVI alpha-helical movement, a key step in receptor activation, to activation of the cognate G-protein.

Constitutively active forms of the hamster alpha(1b)-adrenoceptor can be produced from the point mutations Asp(142)Ala or Ala(293)Glu or exchange of a small segment of the third intracellular loop with the equivalent region of the beta(2)-adrenoceptor. Green fluorescent protein (GFP)-tagged forms of each of these mutants and of the wild type alpha(1b)-adrenoceptor were expressed stably in HEK293 cells. The wild type alpha(1b)-adrenoceptor-GFP was expressed both at the plasma membrane and with a distinctly perinuclear punctate pattern. Sustained treatment with a range of antagonist/inverse agonist ligands failed to modulate the cellular distribution or levels of expression of this construct. The form of the alpha(1b)-adrenoceptor containing the beta(2)-adrenoceptor sequence substitution was predominantly located in punctate intracellular vesicles and sustained challenge with the same series of antagonists/inverse agonists produced a 5-fold up-regulation of protein levels with elevation of both plasma membrane and intracellular receptor. Quantification of these effects could be produced by spectrofluorometric analysis of cells grown in a 96-well microtiter plate. In contrast, both the Asp(142)Ala and Ala(293)Glu forms of the alpha(1b)-adrenoceptor-GFP were located predominantly at the plasma membrane. Levels of these two point mutants were not increased by any of the antagonist/inverse agonist ligands tested, although the sequence substitution mutation encompasses codon 293. Resolution of constitutive activity and ligand-induced up-regulation was further exemplified by a mutant lacking eight serine residues in the C-terminal tail that displayed little constitutive activity but was up-regulated by sustained ligand challenge. These results demonstrate the nonequivalence of mutations in their regulation by antagonist/inverse agonist ligands.

The high failure rate of drugs in the development phase requires a strategy to reduce risks by generating lead candidates from different chemical classes. We describe a new three-dimensional computational approach for lead evolution, based on multiple pharmacophore hypotheses. Using full conformational models for both active and inactive compounds, a large number of pharmacophore hypotheses are analyzed to select the set or "ensemble" of hypotheses that, when combined, is most able to discriminate between active and inactive molecules. The ensemble hypothesis is then used to search virtual chemical libraries to identify compounds for synthesis. This method is very rapid, allowing very large virtual libraries on the order of a million compounds to be filtered efficiently. In applying this method to alpha(1)-adrenergic receptor ligands, we have demonstrated lead evolution from heterocyclic alpha(1)-adrenergic receptor ligands to highly dissimilar active N-substituted glycine compounds. Our results also show that the active N-substituted glycines are part of our smaller filtered library and thus could have been identified by synthesizing only a portion of the N-substituted glycine library.

The roles of the carboxyl-terminal tail of the alpha(1B)-adrenergic receptor in its expression, function, and regulation were investigated by site-directed mutagenesis. The receptor construct truncated after residue 363 seemed not to be properly expressed. In contrast, the receptor truncated after residue 366 and all of the longer receptor constructs were properly expressed and exhibited agonist and antagonist binding and activation of phosphoinositide hydrolysis similar to the wild-type receptor. Agonist-induced sequestration of receptors within the plasma membrane, endocytosis into intracellular vesicles, and eventual down-regulation were all absent in the receptor truncated after residue 366. A series of sequential truncations and a deletion mutation identified a critical role for residues 403 to 425, which include the previously identified sites for G protein-coupled receptor kinase phosphorylation, in agonist-induced internalization of the receptor. Similar studies identified a critical role for residues 367 to 380 in agonist-induced down-regulation. Individual point mutations converting either cysteine 367 or serine 369 to alanine selectively eliminated down-regulation, thus identifying two specific amino acid residues required for down-regulation. Importantly, several of the mutated receptors that failed to show rapid agonist-induced internalization nonetheless exhibited normal agonist-induced down-regulation. In addition to identifying specific regions and individual residues of the alpha(1B)-adrenergic receptor involved in internalization and down-regulation, these studies provide mutated receptors that internalize but do not down-regulate, that down-regulate without internalization, and that are defective in both internalization and down-regulation, all of which should be useful tools for further studies of the specific cellular compartments and molecular mechanisms involved in receptor internalization and down-regulation.

Here, three-dimensional model building and molecular dynamics simulations of the luteinizing hormone receptor have been employed to generate hypotheses about the molecular mechanisms underlying the activation of the receptor induced by naturally occurring activating mutations. The comparative analysis of the wild-type receptor and of 16 constitutively active or inactive mutants has been instrumental in inferring the structural/dynamic features which could characterize the inactive and the active forms of the receptor. These features have been also employed for predicting the functional behavior of new receptor mutants. The results of this study might provide a structural framework to interpret the pathological effects induced by mutations of the luteinizing hormone receptor. In addition, the proposed theoretical model could be useful for engineering new mutations or ligands able to modulate receptor function., (Copyright 2000 Academic Press.)

In this chapter we summarize some aspects of the structure-functional relationship of the alpha 1a and alpha 1b-adrenergic receptor subtypes related to the receptor activation process as well as the effect of different alpha-blockers on the constitutive activity of the receptor. Molecular modeling of the alpha 1a and alpha 1b-adrenergic receptor subtypes and computational simulation of receptor dynamics were useful to interpret the experimental findings derived from site directed mutagenesis studies.

This review focuses on alpha(1)-adrenoceptor phosphorylation and function. Most of what is currently known is based on studies on the hamster alpha(1B)-adrenoceptor. It is known that agonist stimulation leads to homologous desensitization of these receptors and current evidence indicates that such decrease in receptor activity is associated with receptor phosphorylation. Such receptor phosphorylation seems to involve G protein-receptor kinases and the receptor phosphorylation sites have been located in the carboxyl tail (Ser(404), Ser(408), and Ser(410)). There is also evidence showing that in addition to desensitization, receptor phosphorylation is associated with internalization and roles of beta-arrestins have been observed. Direct activation of protein kinase C leads to receptor desensitization/internalization associated with phosphorylation; the protein-kinase-C-catalyzed receptor phosphorylation sites have been also located in the carboxyl tail (Ser(394) and Ser(400)). Activation of G(q)-coupled receptors, such as the endothelin ET(A) receptor induces alpha(1B)-adrenoceptor phosphorylation and desensitization. Such effect involves protein kinase C and a yet unidentified tyrosine kinase. Activation of G(i)-coupled receptors, such as the lysophosphatidic acid receptor, also induces alpha(1B)-adrenoceptor phosphorylation and desensitization. These effects involve protein kinase C and phosphatidyl inositol 3-kinase. Interestingly, activation of epidermal growth factor receptors also induces alpha(1B)-adrenoceptor phosphorylation and desensitization involving protein kinase C and phosphatidyl inositol 3-kinase. A pivotal role of these kinases in heterologous desensitization is evidenced.

We have suggested previously that both the negatively and positively charged residues of the highly conserved Glu/Asp-Arg-Tyr (E/DRY) motif play an important role in the activation process of the alpha(1b)-adreneric receptor (AR). In this study, R143 of the E/DRY sequence in the alpha(1b)-AR was mutated into several amino acids (Lys, His, Glu, Asp, Ala, Asn, and Ile). The charge-conserving mutation of R143 into lysine not only preserved the maximal agonist-induced response of the alpha(1b)-AR, but it also conferred high degree of constitutive activity to the receptor. Both basal and agonist-induced phosphorylation levels were significantly increased for the R143K mutant compared with those of the wild-type receptor. Other substitutions of R143 resulted in receptor mutants with either a small increase in constitutive activity (R143H and R143D), impairment (R143H, R143D), or complete loss of receptor-mediated response (R143E, R143A, R143N, R143I). The R413E mutant displayed a small, but significant increase in basal phosphorylation despite being severely impaired in receptor-mediated response. Interestingly, all the arginine mutants displayed increased affinity for agonist binding compared with the wild-type alpha(1b)-AR. A correlation was found between the extent of the affinity shift and the intrinsic activity of the agonists. The analysis of the receptor mutants using the allosteric ternary complex model in conjunction with the results of molecular dynamics simulations on the receptor models support the hypothesis that mutations of R143 can drive the isomerization of the alpha(1b)-AR into different states, highlighting the crucial role of this residue in the activation process of the receptor.

This study proposes a theoretical model describing the electrostatically driven step of the alpha 1 b-adrenergic receptor (AR)-G protein recognition. The comparative analysis of the structural-dynamics features of functionally different receptor forms, i.e., the wild type (ground state) and its constitutively active mutants D142A and A293E, was instrumental to gain insight on the receptor-G protein electrostatic and steric complementarity. Rigid body docking simulations between the different forms of the alpha 1 b-AR and the heterotrimeric G alpha q, G alpha s, G alpha i1, and G alpha t suggest that the cytosolic crevice shared by the active receptor and including the second and the third intracellular loops as well as the cytosolic extension of helices 5 and 6, represents the receptor surface with docking complementarity with the G protein. On the other hand, the G protein solvent-exposed portions that recognize the intracellular loops of the activated receptors are the N-terminal portion of alpha 3, alpha G, the alpha G/alpha 4 loop, alpha 4, the alpha 4/beta 6 loop, alpha 5, and the C-terminus. Docking simulations suggest that the two constitutively active mutants D142A and A293E recognize different G proteins with similar selectivity orders, i.e., G alpha q approximately equal to G alpha s > G alpha i >> G alpha t. The theoretical models herein proposed might provide useful suggestions for new experiments aiming at exploring the receptor-G protein interface.

We have identified from human liver eight alpha(1A)-adrenoceptor (alpha(1A)-AR) splice variants that were also expressed in human heart, prostate and hippocampus. Three of these alpha(1A)-AR isoforms (alpha(1A-1)-AR, alpha(1A-2a)-AR and alpha(1A-3a)-AR) gave rise to receptors with seven transmembrane domains (7TMalpha(1A)-AR). The other five (alpha(1A-2b)-AR, alpha(1A-2c)-AR, alpha(1A-3c)-AR, alpha(1A-5)-AR and alpha(1A-6)-AR) led to truncated receptors lacking transmembrane domain VII (6TMalpha(1A)-AR). The 7TMalpha(1A)-AR isoforms transiently expressed in COS-7 cells bound [(3)H]prazosin with high affinity (K(d) 0.2 nM) and mediated a noradrenaline (norepinephrine)-induced increase in cytoplasmic free Ca(2+) concentration, whereas the 6TMalpha(1A)-AR isoforms were incapable of ligand binding and signal transduction. Immunocytochemical studies with N-terminal epitope-tagged alpha(1A)-AR isoforms showed that the 7TMalpha(1A)-AR isoforms were present both at the cell surface and in intracellular compartments, whereas the 6TMalpha(1A)-AR isoforms were exclusively localized within the cell. Interestingly, in co-transfected cells, each truncated alpha(1A)-AR isoform inhibited [(3)H]prazosin binding and cell-surface trafficking of the co-expressed 'original' 7TMalpha(1A-1)-AR. However, there was no modification of either the [(3)H]prazosin-binding affinity or the pharmacological properties of alpha(1A-1)-AR. Immunoblotting experiments revealed that co-expression of the alpha(1A-1)-AR with 6TMalpha(1A)-AR isoforms did not impair alpha(1A-1)-AR expression. Therefore the expression in human tissues of many truncated isoforms constitutes a new regulation pathway of biological properties of alpha(1A)-AR.

Serum catecholamine levels and myocardial and lymphocyte adrenergic receptor (AR) concentrations were measured in adult great danes affected by canine dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) and compared to those of healthy animals. A non-homogeneous population of beta -AR, consisting of beta(1)-AR and beta(2)-AR, was observed in healthy (41 and 59%, respectively) and affected (17 and 83%, respectively) dog lymphocytes. Binding assays revealed that total beta -AR, beta(1)-AR and alpha(1)-AR were significantly downregulated (P<0.05;P<0.01;P<0. 001), both in lymphocyte and myocardial cell membranes of affected dogs. beta(2)-Adrenergic receptor concentrations were significantly reduced only in lymphocyte and right atrium cell membranes (P<0.05). Downregulation was not associated with alterations in receptor binding characteristics, as no significant differences in K(d)values were found. Mean plasma catecholamine levels were significantly higher (P<0.01) in DCM dogs (939+/-41) than in normal subjects (348+/-32), thus suggesting a sympathetic activation. The present study indicates a condition similar to that observed in human patients affected by DCM and that adrenergic receptors in canine lymphocytes reflect the fluctuation of adrenergic receptor concentrations in the myocardium., (Copyright 1999 Harcourt Publishers Ltd.)

Alpha1-adrenoceptors are one of three subfamilies of receptors (alpha1, alpha2, beta) mediating responses to adrenaline and noradrenaline. Three alpha1-adrenoceptor subtypes are known (alpha1A, alpha1B, alpha1D) which are all members of the G protein coupled receptor family, and splice variants have been reported in the C-terminus of the alpha1A. They are expressed in many tissues, particularly smooth muscle where they mediate contraction. Certain subtype-selective agonists and antagonists are now available, and alpha1A-adrenoceptor selective antagonists are used to treat benign prostatic hypertrophy. All subtypes activate phospholipase C through the G(q/11) family of G proteins, release stored Ca2+, and activate protein kinase C, although with significant differences in coupling efficiency (alpha1A > alpha1B > alpha1D). Other second messenger pathways are also activated by these receptors, including Ca2+ influx, arachidonic acid release, and phospholipase D. Alpha1-adrenoceptors also activate mitogen-activated protein kinase pathways in many cells, and some of these responses are independent of Ca2+ and protein kinase C but involve small G proteins and tyrosine kinases. Direct interactions of alpha1-adrenoceptors with proteins other than G proteins have not yet been reported, however there is a consensus binding motif for the immediate early gene Homer in the C-terminal tail of the alpha1D subtype. Current research is focused on discovering new subtype-selective drugs, identifying non-traditional signaling pathways activated by these receptors, clarifying how multiple signals are integrated, and identifying proteins interacting directly with the receptors to influence their functions.

We previously reported that a novel GTP binding protein (G alpha h) is tissue type transglutaminase (TGII) and transmits the alpha 1B-adrenoceptor (AR) signal to phospholipase C (PLC) through its GTPase function. We have also shown that PLC-delta 1 is the effector in TGII-mediated signaling. In this study, interaction sites on TGII for the alpha 1B-AR were identified using a peptide approach and site-directed mutagenesis, including in vivo reconstitution of TGIIs with the alpha 1B-AR and PLC-delta 1. To identify the interaction sites, 11 synthetic peptides covering approximately 132 amino acid residues of the C-terminal domain of TGII were tested. The studies with the peptides revealed that three peptides, L547-I561, R564-D581, and Q633-E646, disrupted formation of an alpha 1-agonist-alpha 1B-AR-TGII complex and blocked alpha 1B-AR-mediated TGase inhibition in a dose-dependent manner, indicating that these peptide regions are involved in recognition and activation of TGII by the alpha 1B-AR. These three regions were further evaluated with full-length TGIIs by constructing and coexpressing each site-directed mutant with the alpha 1B-AR and PLC-delta 1 in COS-1 cells. Supporting the findings with these peptides, these TGII mutants lost 56-82% the receptor binding ability and reduced by 29-68% the level of alpha 1B-AR-mediated IP3 production via PLC-delta 1 as compared to those with wild-type TGII. The results also revealed that the regions of R564-D581 and Q633-E646 were the high-affinity binding sites of TGII for the receptor and critical for the activation of TGII by the receptor. Taken together, the studies demonstrate that multiple regions of TGII interact with the alpha 1B-AR and that the alpha 1B-AR stimulates PLC-delta 1 via TGII.

Semliki Forest virus (SFV) vectors have been efficiently used for rapid high level expression of several G protein-coupled receptors. Here we describe the use of SFV vectors to express the alpha 1b-adrenergic receptor (AR) alone or in the presence of the G protein alpha q and/or beta 2 and gamma 2 subunits. Infection of baby hamster kidney (BHK) cells with recombinant SFV-alpha 1b-AR particles resulted in high specific binding activity of the alpha 1b-AR (24 pmol receptor/mg protein). Time-course studies indicated that the highest level of receptor expression was obtained 30 hours post-infection. The stimulation of BHK cells, with epinephrine led to a 5-fold increase in inositol phosphate (IP) accumulation, confirming the functional coupling of the receptor to G protein-mediated activation of phospholipase C. The SFV expression system represents a rapid and reproducible system to study the pharmacological properties and interactions of G protein coupled receptors and of G protein subunits.

Mutational studies in conjunction with ligand binding assays were used to examine the basis of alpha1-adrenergic receptor subtype selectivity for a series of 4-piperidyloxazole antagonists. A set of chimeric alpha 1A receptors were created by systematically substituting individual transmembrane domains from alpha 1D adrenergic receptors. The oxazole antagonists exhibited significant reductions in affinity against the receptor construct alpha 1A/D(TM2), and moderate reductions in affinity versus constructs alpha 1A/D(TM5), alpha 1A/B(TM5), and alpha 1A/D(TM6). Antagonist affinities for these chimeras exceeded those found for wild type alpha 1D and alpha 1B. Site-directed mutagenesis methods were then used to explore the role that individual residues in TM2 and TM5 play in ligand binding affinity and selectivity. These studies revealed that mutations at position 86 in the second transmembrane domain and position 185 in the fifth transmembrane domain of the alpha 1A receptor have a major impact on receptor subtype selectivity.

The adrenergic receptors (ARs) belong to the superfamily of membrane-bound G protein coupled receptors (GPCRs). Our investigation has focused on the structure-function relationship of the alpha 1b-AR subtype used as the model system for other GPCRs. Site-directed mutagenesis studies have elucidated the structural domains of the alpha 1b-AR involved in ligand binding, G protein coupling or desensitization. In addition, a combined approach using site-directed mutagenesis and molecular dynamics analysis of the alpha 1b-AR has provided information about the potential mechanisms underlying the activation process of the receptor, i.e. its transition from the 'inactive' to the 'active' conformation.

Alpha 1-adrenergic receptor (AR) activation is thought to be initiated by disruption of a constraining interhelical salt bridge (). Disruption of this salt bridge is achieved through a competition for the aspartic acid residue in transmembrane domain three by the protonated amine of the endogenous ligand norepinephrine and a lysine residue in transmembrane domain seven. To further test this hypothesis, we investigated the possibility that a simple amine could mimic an important functional group of the endogenous ligand and break this alpha 1-AR ionic constraint leading to agonism. Triethylamine (TEA) was able to generate concentration-dependent increases of soluble inositol phosphates in COS-1 cells transiently transfected with the hamster alpha 1b-AR and in Rat-1 fibroblasts stably transfected with the human alpha 1a-AR subtype. TEA was also able to synergistically potentiate the second messenger production by weak partial alpha 1-AR agonists and this effect was fully inhibited by the alpha 1-AR antagonist prazosin. However, this synergistic potentiation was not observed for full alpha 1-AR agonists. Instead, TEA caused a parallel rightward shift of the dose-response curve, consistent with the properties of competitive antagonism. TEA specifically bound to a single population of alpha 1-ARs with a Ki of 28.7 +/- 4.7 mM. In addition, the site of binding by TEA to the alpha 1-AR is at the conserved aspartic acid residue in transmembrane domain three, which is part of the constraining salt bridge. These results indicate a direct interaction of TEA in the receptor agonist binding pocket that leads to a disruption of the constraining salt bridge, thereby initiating alpha 1-AR activation.

This work describes the ab initio procedure employed to build an activation model for the alpha 1b-adrenergic receptor (alpha 1b-AR). The first version of the model was progressively modified and complicated by means of a many-step iterative procedure characterized by the employment of experimental validations of the model in each upgrading step. A combined simulated (molecular dynamics) and experimental mutagenesis approach was used to determine the structural and dynamic features characterizing the inactive and active states of alpha 1b-AR. The latest version of the model has been successfully challenged with respect to its ability to interpret and predict the functional properties of a large number of mutants. The iterative approach employed to describe alpha 1b-AR activation in terms of molecular structure and dynamics allows further complications of the model to allow prediction and interpretation of an ever-increasing number of experimental data.

We have isolated and characterized from human prostate novel splice variants of the human alpha1A-adrenoceptor, several of which generate truncated products and one isoform, alpha(1A-4), which has the identical splice site as the three previously described isoforms. Long-PCR on human genomic DNA showed that the alpha(1A-4) exon is located between those encoding the alpha(1A-1) and alpha(1A-3) variants. CHO-K1 cells stably expressing alpha(1A-4) showed ligand binding properties similar to those of the other functional isoforms as well as agonist-stimulated inositol phosphate accumulation. Quantitative PCR analyses revealed that alpha(1A-4) is the most abundant isoform expressed in the prostate with high levels also detected in liver and heart.

Selective inactivation of alpha1B-adrenoceptor (AR) by the site-directed alkylating agent chlorethylclonidine (CEC) has been used as one of major pharmacological criteria to subclassify alpha1-AR; however, the mechanism for the differential CEC sensitivity of the two subtypes is uncertain, and the extent of CEC inactivation varies depending on the treatment employed. In this study, we examined the correlation between the subcellular localization of alpha1-AR subtypes (alpha1A and alpha1B) and CEC sensitivity. Constructing alpha1-AR tagged with the FLAG epitope at the amino terminus and/or green fluorescent protein (GFP) at the carboxyl terminus, we examined the subcellular distribution of alpha1-ARs expressed in COS-7 cells. Flow cytometry analysis showed that most populations of GFP-expressing alpha1B-AR cells, but very few GFP-expressing alpha1A-AR cells, were detected by the anti-amino terminus antibodies. The immunocytochemical and GFP-fluorescence confocal micrographs showed that alpha1A-ARs predominantly localize intracellularly, whereas alpha1B-ARs localize on the cell surface. Furthermore, CEC (10 microM) treatment of intact cells resulted in an inactivation of approximately 42% of alpha1A-ARs and 93% of alpha1B-ARs, whereas treatment of the membrane preparations resulted in an inactivation of approximately 83% of alpha1A-ARs and 88% of alpha1B-ARs, respectively. Together, the results showed that a hydrophilic alkylating agent CEC preferentially inactivates alpha1-AR on the cell surface irrespective of its subtype, and that the subtype-specific subcellular localization rather than the receptor structure is a major determinant for CEC inactivation of alpha1-AR. Subtype-specific subcellular localization suggests an additional class of functional properties that provide new insight into drug action.