101. The effectiveness and value of novel treatments for cystic fibrosis.
- Author
-
Kuntz, Karen, Wherry, Kael, Seidner, Matt, Rind, David, Pearson, Steven, and Tice, Jeffrey
- Subjects
Adolescent ,Aminophenols ,Aminopyridines ,Benzodioxoles ,Child ,Chloride Channel Agonists ,Cost-Benefit Analysis ,Cystic Fibrosis ,Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance Regulator ,Drug Approval ,Drug Combinations ,Drug Costs ,Health Policy ,Humans ,Indoles ,Models ,Economic ,Mutation ,Pyrazoles ,Pyridines ,Quinolines ,Quinolones ,Treatment Outcome ,United States ,United States Food and Drug Administration - Abstract
DISCLOSURES: Funding for this summary was contributed by Arnold Ventures, California Health Care Foundation, Harvard Pilgrim Health Care, and Kaiser Foundation Health Plan to the Institute for Clinical and Economic Review (ICER), an independent organization that evaluates the evidence on the value of health care interventions. ICERs annual policy summit is supported by dues from Aetna, Americas Health Insurance Plans, Anthem, Allergan, Alnylam, AstraZeneca, Biogen, Blue Shield of CA, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Cambia Health Services, CVS, Editas, Express Scripts, Genentech/Roche, GlaxoSmithKline, Harvard Pilgrim, Health Care Service Corporation, HealthFirst, Health Partners, Johnson & Johnson (Janssen), Kaiser Permanente, LEO Pharma, Mallinckrodt, Merck, Novartis, National Pharmaceutical Council, Pfizer, Premera, Prime Therapeutics, Regeneron, Sanofi, Spark Therapeutics, and United Healthcare. Seidner, Rind, and Pearson are employed by ICER. Tice reports contracts to his institution, University of California, San Francisco, from ICER during the conduct of this study. Wherry has nothing to disclose.
- Published
- 2021