101. Vicarious Experience to Affect Physical Activity in Women: A Randomized Control Trial.
- Author
-
Rowland, Sheri A., Cohen, Marlene Z., Pullen, Carol H., Schulz, Paula S., Berg, Kris E., Kupzyk, Kevin A., Pozehl, Bunny J., and Yates, Bernice C.
- Subjects
ANALYSIS of variance ,EXERCISE ,HEALTH ,HEALTH behavior ,MOTIVATION (Psychology) ,RESEARCH funding ,STATISTICAL sampling ,SELF-efficacy ,SOCIAL skills ,THOUGHT & thinking ,WOMEN'S health ,WORK environment ,INFORMATION resources ,THEORY ,AFFINITY groups ,RANDOMIZED controlled trials ,REPEATED measures design ,PHYSICAL activity ,DATA analysis software ,DESCRIPTIVE statistics - Abstract
People compare themselves to others for self-evaluation, practical information, and motivation for healthy behaviors. The effect of active peer models on comparative thinking is unknown. The purpose of this 12-week, randomized, two-group pilot study was to evaluate the effect of a workplace peer modeling intervention on self-efficacy, motivation, and comparative thinking. The attention control group (ACG; n = 24) received general health information. The intervention group (n = 26) met with active peer models, received an exercise prescription and information. No significant group by time interaction effects were found. Comparisons on ability (how well am I doing), opinions (what should I think or believe), future self (think about my future), and modeling (be like someone else) all increased in the intervention group (n = 21) but decreased in the ACG (n = 22). Active peer models may support physical activity behavior change through specific lines of comparative thinking. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF