Search

Introduction. One of the puzzling problems in chronic pain after a whiplash injury is the discrepancy between the patient's symptoms and the clinical findings. The patients may be incapacitated by their symptoms, but clinical, laboratory or imaging investigations often reveal no or only minor pathology. We have reviewed the present evidence of altered sensory processing in chronic pain after whiplash injury, discuss this mechanism as one of the determinants of the pain complaints and outline possible treatment strategies.Methods. A review of human studies on sensory processing in patients with chronic pain after a whiplash injury, and a review of animal and human studies of mechanisms of altered sensory processing after injury.Results. There is evidence that patients with chronic pain after a whiplash injury have an altered sensory processing indicating a generalized hyperexcitability of the nociceptive system. This could be explained by ongoing nociceptive activity from an unidentified focus, irr...

Objective The mechanisms underlying chronic pain after whiplash injury are usually unclear. Injuries may cause sensitization of spinal cord neurons in animals (central hypersensitivity), which results in increased responsiveness to peripheral stimuli. In humans, the responsiveness of the central nervous system to peripheral stimulation may be explored by applying sensory tests to healthy tissues. The hypotheses of this study were: (1) chronic whiplash pain is associated with central hypersensitivity; (2) central hypersensitivity is maintained by nociception arising from the painful or tender muscles in the neck. Design Comparison of patients with healthy controls. Setting Pain clinic and laboratory for pain research, university hospital. Patients Fourteen patients with chronic neck pain after whiplash injury (car accident) and 14 healthy volunteers. Outcome measures Pain thresholds to: single electrical stimulus (intramuscular), repeated electrical stimulation (intramuscular and transcutaneous), and heat (transcutaneous). Each threshold was measured at neck and lower limb, before and after local anesthesia of the painful and tender muscles of the neck. Results The whiplash group had significantly lower pain thresholds for all tests. except heat, at both neck and lower limb. Local anesthesia of the painful and tender points affected neither intensity of neck pain nor pain thresholds. Conclusions The authors found a hypersensitivity to peripheral stimulation in whiplash patients. Hypersensitivity was observed after cutaneous and muscular stimulation, at both neck and lower limb. Because hypersensitivity was observed in healthy tissues, it resulted from alterations in the central processing of sensory stimuli (central hypersensitivity). Central hypersensitivity was not dependent on a nociceptive input arising from the painful and tender muscles.

SENSORY assessment of regional analgesia is performed routinely for clinical purposes and also plays an important role in anesthesia and pain research. In the past years, new methods were developed and old methods were improved. Technological progress has allowed a more reliable delivery of different stimulation patterns and more advanced recordings of physiologic parameters related to nociceptive processing and modulation. Important developments include methods that explore the activation of different nerve fibers, models that activate specific spinal cord mechanisms (such as temporal summation), and methods that evaluate muscle and visceral pain. As a result of this new knowledge, the application of sensory testing of regional analgesia in humans must be redetermined. New indications of the use of these methods then can be provided. In the current article, we update the knowledge available in the field of sensory assessment of regional analgesia in humans. The aims are as follows: (1) to describe and analyze the methods, (2) to define the applications, (3) to provide evidence-based indications for the use of these methods in anesthesia and pain research, and (4) to define areas in which further research is needed.

Objective: To test the following hypotheses: there is a correlation between spread of epidural analgesia as assessed postoperatively by pinprick/cold test and postoperative pain intensity; block of pinprick/cold sensation is associated with absence of postoperative pain. Design: Correlation analysis on prospectively collected data. Setting: University hospital. Patients: One hundred patients undergoing major surgery. Consecutive sample. Interventions: Patients received an epidural infusion of bupivacaine I mg/ml, fentanyl 2 μg/ml, and epinephrine 2 μg/ml for at least 48 hours postoperatively. The infusion rate was adjusted according to pain intensity, occurrence of hypotension, or motor block. Outcome Measures: Assessments were made on three time points: 20-24 hours, 32-36 hours, and 42-48 hours after extubation. Assessments included pinprick and cold sensitivity from C2 to S5, pain intensity (visual analogue scale, VAS) at rest, after cough, and after mobilization. Data were analyzed by multiple regression. Results: VAS significantly decreased with increasing spread (number of dermatomes for which hyposensitivity to pinprick or cold was observed). Spread could explain only 2-5% of the variability of VAS. Absence of both pinprick and cold sensation at all dermatomes corresponding to the surgical wound was frequently associated with pain. A high proportion of patients manifesting an upper level of block above T5 had pain after abdominal surgery. Conclusions: Spread and efficacy of epidural analgesia as assessed by pinprick and cold stimulation correlate poorly with postoperative pain. These methods are of limited value both as clinical indicators of the efficacy of postoperative pain control and for investigating the effect of epidural drugs and techniques.

SUMMARY One hundred and fifty years after the first general anaesthetic in 1846 our knowledge about the mechanisms of general anaesthetics is still very sparse. The concept ‘depth of anaesthesia’ was introduced by John Snow (1847). He described ‘5° of narcotism’. Because one single agent had to provide all the components of general anaesthesia, the main problem for the anaesthetist was to avoid morbidity and mortality associated with excessively deep anaesthesia. The introduction of curare in 1942 allowed muscle relaxation required for surgery during a lighter level of anaesthesia, but also changed the emphasis from the problem of too deep anaesthesia and death, to too light anaesthesia and litigation. The problem of awareness during general anaesthesia with muscle relaxants provided the main impetus for monitoring depth of anaesthesia. During daily clinical practice the anaesthesiologist relies on clinical signs to evaluate anaesthetic depth, although several studies have shown a poor correlation between the 2 (Cullen et al. 1972; Evans and Davies 1984; Russell 1993). Different methods have been used in attempts to measure anaesthetic depth (Evans and Davies 1984; Stanski 1994), but none have been developed to a state where they can be used routinely in the operating theatre. This review will cover some of the parameters used to evaluate anaesthetic depth.

Seit Ende Mai protestieren in verschiedenen türkischen Städten immer wieder Bürger gegen die bevormundende Politik der konservativen AKP-Regierung und den unverhältnismäßigen Umgang der Sicherheitskräfte mit Demonstranten. Die Forderungen nach stärkerer partizipativer Politik, bürgerlicher Mitsprache bei öffentlichen Entscheidungen und dem Schutz der Bürgerrechte sind Ausdruck eines Willens zur Demokratie. Aber was ist eigentlich demokratisch an diesen Protesten?, JuWissBlog

The analgesic effect of subanaesthetic concentrations of ether, trichloroethylene, methoxyflurane and halothane has been investigated previously using either clinical assessment or pain threshold measurements, but with conflicting results. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the analgesic effect of isoflurane using experimental pain models. We studied 12 healthy volunteers at three randomly chosen subanaesthetic isoflurane concentrations: low (0.10-0.14 vol%), middle (0.16-0.20 vol%) and high (0.22-0.26 vol%). We used thermal pain detection and pain tolerance thresholds to argon laser stimulation, pressure pain detection and pain tolerance thresholds, immersion of the hand in ice water, and the nociceptive reflex to single and repeated (temporal summation) electrical stimulations, as experimental models to assess analgesia. There were no significant changes in the response to heat, cold or mechanical pressure at any of the subanaesthetic concentrations of isoflurane used. The nociceptive reflex thresholds to single stimulations, but not the thresholds for repeated stimulations, were significantly increased in all three isoflurane groups compared with baseline values. The difference between the different isoflurane concentrations was not statistically significant. In experimental pain models, subanaesthetic isoflurane concentrations have little or no analgesic potency.

Background Potency of inhaled anesthetics usually is defined by determining the minimal alveolar concentration (MAC) that prevents movement in 50% of patients in response to skin incision. Skin incision, however, is usually only a single event and, thus, determination of potency cannot be repeated in one patient. Traditional MACskin incision cannot be used to predict response to other noxious stimuli. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of other noxious stimulation patterns and then compare these to MACskin incision measuring the end-tidal isoflurane concentrations with the corresponding arterial concentrations. Methods In 26 patients, the end-tidal and corresponding arterial isoflurane concentrations needed to suppress eye opening to verbal command and motor response after trapezius squeeze, 50 Hz electric tetanic stimulation, laryngoscopy, skin incision, and tracheal intubation in 50% of all patients were determined. Results The end-tidal (equivalent arterial) isoflurane concentrations (mean +/- SE, adjusted to sea level) expressed in vol% (to allow comparison) increased in the following order (mean +/- SE): vocal command 0.37 +/- 0.09 (0.36 +/- 0.09); trapezius squeeze 0.84 +/- 0.07 (0.65 +/- 0.07); laryngoscopy 1.00 +/- 0.12 (0.78 +/- 0.09); tetanic stimulation 1.03 +/- 0.09 (0.80 +/- 0.06); skin incision 1.16 +/- 0.10 (0.97 +/- 0.17); and intubation 1.76 +/- 0.13 (1.32 +/- 0.11). Conclusions Different stimuli require different isoflurane concentrations to suppress motor responses. Tetanic stimulation and, to some extent, trapezius squeeze are reproducible and noninvasive stimulation patterns that can be used as an alternative to skin incision when evaluating potency of an anesthetic agent. In contrast to skin incision, they can be repeated.

Background The hemodynamic effects of isoflurane have been studied extensively. However, most data are obtained from volunteers or patients in the absence of surgical stimulation. The hemodynamic responses to various stimulation patterns of different intensity have not been evaluated. Methods In 26 patients, the ability of isoflurane to suppress motor and hemodynamic reactions in response to noxious stimulations of variable degree (trapezius squeeze, tetanic stimulation, laryngoscopy, skin incision, and laryngoscopy plus intubation) was evaluated by measuring arterial blood pressure and heart rate before and after stimulation. Results At concentrations that inhibited motor response to these stimuli in 50% of all patients, systolic blood pressure increased by 9 (trapezius squeeze), 15 (tetanic stimulation), 23 (laryngoscopy), 35 (skin incision) and 49 (intubation) mmHg, and heart rate by 5 (trapezius squeeze), 15 (tetanic stimulation), 17 (laryngoscopy), 36 (skin incision), and 36 (intubation) min-1 compared to the prestimulation values. An analysis using multiple regression showed that blood pressure response was influenced most by the type of stimulation followed by the concomitantly occurring motor reaction, the anesthesia time, and least by the isoflurane concentration per se. A high isoflurane concentration had no influence on the magnitude of blood pressure or heart rate increase to stimulation, but it decreased the prestimulation blood pressure and slightly increased the prestimulation heart rate. Heart rate responses were less consistent than those of blood pressure. Conclusions Isoflurane used as a sole agent is unable to suppress hemodynamic reactions (blood pressure and heart rate) to painful stimuli. A “normal” blood pressure following stimulation can be achieved only if prestimulation blood pressure is depressed to levels that may be clinically unacceptable. The lack of motor response is not an accurate predictor of the ability of an agent to depress hemodynamic reaction.

It generally is assumed that the potency of inhalational anesthetics remains unchanged during the course of the administration of an anesthetic. Only one study has indicated a decrease of minimum alveolar concentration with time. In this study, an effect of the duration of anesthesia administration and surgery on the potency of isoflurane was investigated by determining MACtetanus (the minimum alveolar concentration that prevents movement in response to electrical tetanic stimulation in 50% of patients) before and after surgery.Ten patients who underwent removal of a herniated intervertebral disc were anesthetized with isoflurane only. Reaction to a standardized electrical stimulation applied to the forearm was observed and was graded as movement or no-movement. The isoflurane concentration was increased in steps of 0.10 vol% if the patient moved and decreased in steps of 0.10 vol% if no reaction was seen, until a "movement/no-movement/movement" or "no-movement/movement/no-movement" pattern, respectively, was achieved.MACtetanus decreased in all patients from 1.28 +/- 0.22 vol% (mean +/- SD) before surgery to 1.04 +/- 0.22 vol% after surgery (P0.01). When the prestimulation arterial blood pressure or the maximal increase in blood pressure caused by stimulation at the individual MACtetanus before surgery were compared to the corresponding values at the individual MACtetanus after surgery, no significant difference could be found. The prestimulation heart rate and the maximal increase in heart rate were significantly lower after surgery, even though the end-tidal isoflurane concentration was 0.24 vol% lower at the individual MACtetanus after surgery.The authors conclude that MACtetanus decreases during the administration of anesthesia and the performance of surgery.

We present a case of a probably unnecessary Caesarean section due to misinterpretation of the cardiotocography (CTG) trace during general anaesthesia. A 27‐yr‐old patient in her 30th week of an uneventful, normal first pregnancy presented with a deep venous thrombosis in the pelvic region. She was to undergo an emergency thrombectomy under general anaesthesia. During the operation, the CTG showed a lack of beat‐to‐beat heart rate variation (silent pattern CTG) with normal fetal heart rate. This silent CTG pattern was probably a result of the effect of general anaesthesia on the fetus. The CTG pattern was interpreted as indicating fetal distress, and an emergency Caesarean section was performed after the thrombectomy. The infant was apnoeic and had to be resuscitated and admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit. The pH at delivery was 7.23 and the baby was extubated 2 days later. Mother and child recovered without short‐term sequelae. In the absence of alternative explanations, reduced fetal beat‐to‐beat variability with a normal baseline heart rate during general anaesthesia is probably normal. Br J Anaesth 2001; 87: 791-3

Assessments of spinal nociceptive withdrawal reflexes can be used in human research both to evaluate the effect of analgesics and explore pain mechanisms related to sensitization. Before the reflex can be used as a clinical tool, normative values need to be determined in large scale studies. The aim of this study was to determine the reference values of spinal nociceptive reflexes and subjective pain thresholds (to single and repeated stimulation), and of the area of the reflex receptive fields (RRF) in 300 pain-free volunteers. The influences of gender, age, height, weight, body-mass index (BMI), body side of testing, depression, anxiety, catastrophizing and parameters of Short-Form 36 (SF-36) were analyzed by multiple regressions. The 95% confidence intervals were determined for all the tests as normative values. Age had a statistically and quantitatively significant impact on the subjective pain threshold to single stimuli. The reflex threshold to single stimulus was lower on the dominant compared to the non-dominant side. Depression had a negative impact on the subjective pain threshold to single stimuli. All the other analyses either did not reveal statistical significance or displayed quantitatively insignificant correlations. In conclusion, normative values of parameters related to the spinal nociceptive reflex were determined. This allows their clinical application for assessing central hyperexcitability in individual patients. The parameters investigated explore different aspects of sensitization processes that are largely independent of demographic characteristics, cognitive and affective factors.

BACKGROUND: Calcitonin was effective in a study of acute phantom limb pain, but it was not studied in the chronic phase. The overall literature on N-methyl-D-aspartate antagonists is equivocal. We tested the hypothesis that calcitonin, ketamine, and their combination are effective in treating chronic phantom limb pain. Our secondary aim was to improve our understanding of the mechanisms of action of the investigated drugs using quantitative sensory testing. METHODS: Twenty patients received, in a randomized, double-blind, crossover manner, 4 i.v. infusions of: 200 IE calcitonin; ketamine 0.4 mg/kg (only 10 patients); 200 IE of calcitonin combined with ketamine 0.4 mg/kg; placebo, 0.9% saline. Intensity of phantom pain (visual analog scale) was recorded before, during, at the end, and the 48 h after each infusion. Pain thresholds after electrical, thermal, and pressure stimulation were recorded before and during each infusion. RESULTS: Ketamine, but not calcitonin, reduced phantom limb pain. The combination was not superior to ketamine alone. There was no difference in basal pain thresholds between the amputated and contralateral side except for pressure pain. Pain thresholds were unaffected by calcitonin. The analgesic effect of the combination of calcitonin and ketamine was associated with a significant increase in electrical thresholds, but with no change in pressure and heat thresholds. CONCLUSIONS: Our results question the usefulness of calcitonin in chronic phantom limb pain and stress the potential interest of N-methyl-D-aspartate antagonists. Sensory assessments indicated that peripheral mechanisms are unlikely important determinants of phantom limb pain. Ketamine, but not calcitonin, affects central sensitization processes that are probably involved in the pathophysiology of phantom limb pain.

Udgivelsesdato: APR

Pain has been defined by the International Asso­ ciation for the Study of Pain as "an unpleasant sensory and emotional experience associated with actual or potential tissue damage, or described in terms of such damage." The definition clearly stresses that pain is a subjective conscious feeling. It is therefore a question whether one can speak of pain during a general anesthesia where the patient is uncon­ scious; however, the activity of the nociceptive system can be assessed during general anesthesia by direct measurements (eg, dorsal horn recording in animals) and ind irect measurements or observations (eg, move­ ment or withdrawal reflexes, and hemodynamic or hor­ monal responses to painful stimuli in animals and hu­ mans). Problems may arise when extrapolating to humans results obtained in animals. Different species may not show the same reactions. In animals, microelectrode recordings of events in the spinal cord can be made, and isolation of the spinal cord from higher central nervous system centers can be achieved through spinal cord transection. Obviously, this is not possible in humans. For human research , we have to rely on responses (psychophysical and/or electrophysiologic) evoked by activation of dorsal horn neurons through stimulation of peripheral receptors.

The available literature consistently shows increased pain sensitivity after sensory stimulation of healthy tissues in patients who have various chronic pain conditions. This indicates a state of hypersensitivity of the CNS that amplifies the nociceptive input arising from damaged tissues. Experimental data indicate that central hypersensitivity is probably induced primarily by nociceptive input arising from a diseased tissue. In patients, imbalance of descending modulatory systems connected with psychologic distress may play a role. There is experimental support in animal studies for the persistence of central hypersensitivity after complete resolution of tissue damage. This is particularly true for neuropathic pain conditions, whereby potentially irreversible plasticity changes of the CNS have been documented in animal studies. Whether such changes are present in musculoskeletal pain states is at present uncertain. Despite the likely importance of central hypersensitivity in the pathophysiology of chronic pain, this mechanism should not be used to justify the lack of understanding on the anatomic origin of the pain complaints in several pain syndromes, which is mostly due to limitations of the available diagnostic tools. Treatment strategies for central hypersensitivity in patients have been investigated mostly in neuropathic pain states. Possible therapy modalities for central hypersensitivity in chronic pain of musculoskeletal origin are largely unexplored. The limited evidence available and everyday practice show, at best, modest efficacy of the available treatment modalities for central hypersensitivity. The gap between basic knowledge and clinical benefits remains large and should stimulate further intensive research.

Is to test the hypothesis that 70% xenon has a relevant opioid sparing effect compared to a minimum alveolar concentration (MAC)-equivalent combination of N(2)O and desflurane.In this randomized, controlled study of 30 patients undergoing major orthopedic surgery, we determined the plasma alfentanil concentration required to suppress response to skin incision in 50% of patients (Cp(50)) anesthetized with xenon (70%) or a combination of N(2)O (70%) and desflurane (2%). A response was defined as movement, pressor response15 mmHg, heart rate90 beats x min(-1), autonomic reactions or a combination of these. At skin incision, alfentanil was administered at a randomly selected target plasma concentration thereafter the concentration was increased or decreased according to the patient's response. After skin incision, desflurane was adjusted to maintain the bispectral index below 60 and prevent responsiveness in both groups.The Cp(50) (+/- standard error) of alfentanil was 83 +/- 48ng x mL(-1) with xenon and 49 +/- 26 ng x mL(-1) with N(2)O/desflurane (P =0.451). During surgery five xenon and 15 N(2)O/desflurane patients were given desflurane at 1.0 +/- 0.5 volume % and 2.5 +/- 0.7 volume %. The total age adjusted MAC was 0.97 +/- 0.07 and 0.94 +/- 0.07 respectively (P = 0.217). The intraoperative plasma alfentanil concentrations were 95 +/- 80 and 93 +/- 60 ng x mL(-1) respectively (mean +/- SD; P = 0.451). Patients given xenon were slightly more bradycardic, whereas blood pressure was similar.Xenon compared to a MAC-equivalent combination of N(2)O and desflurane does not substantially reduce opioid requirement for orthopedic surgery. A small but clinically irrelevant difference cannot be excluded, however.

Patients with chronic pain after whiplash injury and fibromyalgia patients display exaggerated pain after sensory stimulation. Because evident tissue damage is usually lacking, this exaggerated pain perception could be explained by hyperexcitability of the central nervous system. The nociceptive withdrawal reflex (a spinal reflex) may be used to study the excitability state of spinal cord neurons. We tested the hypothesis that patients with chronic whiplash pain and fibromyalgia display facilitated withdrawal reflex and therefore spinal cord hypersensitivity. Three groups were studied: whiplash (n=27), fibromyalgia (n=22) and healthy controls (n=29). Two types of transcutaneous electrical stimulation of the sural nerve were applied: single stimulus and five repeated stimuli at 2 Hz. Electromyography was recorded from the biceps femoris muscle. The main outcome measurement was the minimum current intensity eliciting a spinal reflex (reflex threshold). Reflex thresholds were significantly lower in the whiplash compared with the control group, after both single (P=0.024) and repeated (P=0.035) stimulation. The same was observed for the fibromyalgia group, after both stimulation modalities (P=0.001 and 0.046, respectively). We provide evidence for spinal cord hyperexcitability in patients with chronic pain after whiplash injury and in fibromyalgia patients. This can cause exaggerated pain following low intensity nociceptive or innocuous peripheral stimulation. Spinal hypersensitivity may explain, at least in part, pain in the absence of detectable tissue damage.

Avoiding excessively deep levels of sedation is a major problem in intensive care patients. We studied whether clinically relevant levels of sedation can be objectively assessed using long latency auditory evoked potentials. We measured the auditory evoked potentials at 100 ms after the stimulus (N100) in 10 healthy volunteers during stepwise increasing, clinically relevant levels of sedation (Ramsay score [RS] 2–4). The volunteers were studied on three separate occasions and received an infusion of either propofol or a combination of propofol and remifentanil. Effects of remifentanil infusion alone were tested during target controlled infusion (target plasma concentrations: 1, 2, and 3 ng/mL). Remifentanil did not affect evoked potential amplitudes and latencies. During both propofol-induced and propofol/remifentanil-induced sedation, the N100 amplitude decreased similarly without an effect on the latencies as the level of sedation increased from Ramsay score 2 to Ramsay score 4 (P < 0.01). At the same clinical level of sedation, propofol plasma concentrations were larger when sedation was achieved by propofol alone (propofol versus propofol/remifentanil, RS 3: 2.12 μg/mL ± 0.51 versus 1.32 ± 0.43, P < 0.01; RS 4: 3.37 ± 0.47 versus 1.86 ± 0.34, P < 0.01). Our results suggest that long latency auditory evoked potentials provide an objective electrophysiological analog to the clinical assessment of sedation independent of the sedation regime used.

Objectives To provide insights into the mechanisms underlying central hypersensitivity, review the evidence on central hypersensitivity in chronic pain after whiplash injury, highlight reflections on the clinical relevance of central hypersensitivity, and offer a perspective of treatment of central hypersensitivity. Methods A review of animal and human studies focusing on the mechanisms of postinjury central sensitization, an analysis of psychophysical investigations on central hypersensitivity in patients with chronic pain after whiplash injury, and a review of possible treatment modalities. Results Animal data show that tissue damage produces plasticity changes at different neuronal structures that are responsible for amplification of nociception and exaggerated pain responses. Some of these changes are potentially irreversible. There is consistent psychophysical evidence for hypersensitivity of the central nervous system to sensory stimulation in chronic pain after whiplash injury. Tissue damage, detected or not by the available diagnostic methods, is probably the main determinant of central hypersensitivity. Psychologic distress could contribute to central hypersensitivity via imbalance of supraspinal and descending modulatory mechanisms. Although specific treatment strategies are limited, they are largely unexplored. Implications Central hypersensitivity may explain exaggerated pain in the presence of minimal nociceptive input arising from minimally damaged tissues. This could account for pain and disability in the absence of objective signs of tissue damage in patients with whiplash. Central hypersensitivity may provide a common neurobiological framework for the integration of peripheral and supraspinal mechanisms in the pathophysiology of chronic pain after whiplash. Therapy studies are needed.

There is no objective measure of a complete pain perception; we can, however, measure different aspects of nociceptive processing and pain perception. Earlier, experimental pain models often only involved induction of cutaneous pain using a single stimulus modality. Recently new experimental models have been developed eliciting various modalities of deep and visceral pain which more closely resemble clinical pain conditions. It is imperative to use multi-modal and multi-structure pain induction and assessment techniques, because a simple model cannot describe the very complex and multi-factorial aspects of clinical pain. Furthermore, it is important to assess pain under normal and pathophysiological conditions. The importance of peripheral and central hyperexcitability for acute and chronic pain has been demonstrated in animals and, to some extent, in humans. However, in spite of our immense knowledge, we still do not know how to prevent and treat this hyperexcitability efficiently. Our understanding of nociceptive mechanisms involved in acute and chronic pain and the effects of anaesthetic drugs or combinations of drugs on these mechanisms in humans may also be expanded using human experimental models. This mechanism-based approach may help us to develop and test therapeutic regimes in patients with acute and chronic pain.

Udgivelsesdato: APR

Background. Despite extensive use, different aspects of the pharmacological action of epidural fentanyl have not been clarified. We applied a multi‐modal sensory test procedure to investigate the effect of epidural fentanyl on segmental spread, temporal summation (as a measure for short‐lasting central hyperexcitability) and muscle pain. Methods. Thirty patients received either placebo, 50 or 100 µg single dose of fentanyl epidurally (L2-3), in a randomized, double‐blind fashion. Heat pain tolerance thresholds at eight dermatomes from S1 to fifth cranial nerve (assessment of segmental spread), pain threshold to transcutaneous repeated electrical stimulation of the sural nerve (assessment of temporal summation) and pain intensity after injection of hypertonic saline into the tibialis anterior muscle (assessment of muscle pain) were recorded. Results. Fentanyl 100 µg, but not 50 µg, produced analgesia to heat stimulation only at L2. Surprisingly, no effect at S1 was detected. Both fentanyl doses significantly increased temporal summation threshold and decreased muscle pain intensity. Conclusions. The findings suggest that a single lumbar epidural dose of fentanyl should be injected at the spinal interspace corresponding to the dermatomal site of pain. Increased effect on L2 compared with S1 suggests that drug effect on spinal nerve roots and binding to opioid receptors on the dorsal root ganglia may be more important than traditionally believed for the segmental effect of epidurally injected fentanyl. Epidural fentanyl increases temporal summation threshold and could therefore contribute to prevention and treatment of central hypersensitivity states. I.M. injection of hypertonic saline is a sensitive technique for detecting the analgesic action of epidural opioids. Br J Anaesth 2003; 90: 467-73

From folk medicine and anecdotal reports it is known that Cannabis may reduce pain. In animal studies it has been shown that delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) has antinociceptive effects or potentiates the antinociceptive effect of morphine. The aim of this study was to measure the analgesic effect of THC, morphine, and a THC-morphine combination (THC-morphine) in humans using experimental pain models. THC (20 mg), morphine (30 mg), THC-morphine (20 mg THC+30 mg morphine), or placebo were given orally and as single doses. Twelve healthy volunteers were included in the randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded, crossover study. The experimental pain tests (order randomized) were heat, cold, pressure, single and repeated transcutaneous electrical stimulation. Additionally, reaction time, side-effects (visual analog scales), and vital functions were monitored. For the pharmacokinetic profiling, blood samples were collected. THC did not significantly reduce pain. In the cold and heat tests it even produced hyperalgesia, which was completely neutralized by THC-morphine. A slight additive analgesic effect could be observed for THC-morphine in the electrical stimulation test. No analgesic effect resulted in the pressure and heat test, neither with THC nor THC-morphine. Psychotropic and somatic side-effects (sleepiness, euphoria, anxiety, confusion, nausea, dizziness, etc.) were common, but usually mild.

The nociceptive system is not just a system for the conduction of pain impulses from the periphery to the brain. We now know that plastic changes can take place in the periphery, the spinal cord and also in higher brain centres following injury or inflammation. These changes may increase the magnitude of the perceived pain and may contribute to the development of chronic pain syndromes. Although our knowledge is growing, we are now almost more confused as to how we should intervene in order to attenuate or inhibit neuroplasticity. The present review examines the current knowledge on mechanism, clinical significance and prevention of neuroplastic changes.

Background. The laser-Doppler skin vasomotor reflex (SVmR) caused by tetanic stimulation of the ulnar nerve may be a test that can predict the haemodynamic response to tracheal intubation. A decrease in pulse wave amplitude (pulse wave reflex, PWR) may be an alternative index of this response. We compared the abilities of PWR and SVmR to predict the haemodynamic response to tracheal intubation and studied how alfentanil, muscle relaxation, stimulation site and stimulation pattern affected the two reflexes. Methods. Anaesthesia was induced and maintained with 2% sevoflurane and 50% nitrous oxide in two groups of 10 ASA status I patients. Tetanic stimuli were applied to the flexor muscles of the forearm and the ulnar nerve before and after administration of vecuronium. The change in skin blood flow (laser-Doppler) and pulse wave amplitude (pulse oximetry) after a 5 and 10 s stimulation was measured on the opposite hand. If skin blood flow (laser-Doppler) decreased by more than 10%, a computer-controlled infusion of alfentanil was started and the target plasma concentration was increased in steps until this response was suppressed (

Background Several experimental pain models have been used to measure opioid effects in humans. The aim of the current study was to compare the qualities of five frequently used experimental pain tests to measure opioid effects. Methods The increase of electrical, heat, and pressure pain tolerance and the decrease of ice-water and ischemic pain perception was determined at baseline and at four different plasma concentrations of alfentanil (n = 7) administered as target controlled infusion or placebo (n = 7). A linear mixed-effects modeling (NONMEM) was performed to detect drug, placebo, and time effect as well as interindividual and intraindividual variation of effect. Results Only the electrical, ice-water, and pressure pain tests are sensitive to assess a concentration-response curve of alfentanil. At a plasma alfentanil concentration of 100 ng/ml, the increase in pain tolerance compared with baseline was 42.0% for electrical pain, 22.2% for pressure pain, and 21.7% for ice-water pain. The slope of the linear concentration-response curve had an interindividual coefficient of variation of 58.3% in electrical pain, 35.6% in pressure pain, and 60.0% in ice-water pain. The residual error including intraindividual variation at an alfentanil concentration of 100 ng/ml was 19.4% for electrical pain, 6.1% for pressure pain, and 13.0% for ice-water pain. Electrical pain was affected by a significant placebo effect, and pressure pain was affected by a significant time effect. Conclusion Electrical, pressure, and ice-water pain, but not ischemic and heat pain, provide significant concentration-response curves in the clinically relevant range of 200 ng/ml alfentanil or lower. The power to detect a clinically relevant shift of the curve is similar in the three tests. The appropriate test(s) for pharmacodynamic studies should be chosen according to the investigated drug(s) and the study design.

In experimental studies, drug‐induced analgesia is usually assessed by cutaneous stimulation. If analgesics act differently on cutaneous and deep nociception, the results of these studies may not be entirely applicable to clinical pain involving deep structures. We tested the hypothesis that opioids have different abilities to inhibit cutaneous and muscular pain. Either the opioid remifentanil or placebo was infused in 12 healthy volunteers in a cross‐over fashion. Repeated electrical stimulation (five impulses at 2Hz) was applied to both skin and muscle. Pain thresholds were recorded. Remifentanil caused a higher increase in the muscular pain thresholds than in the cutaneous pain thresholds (P=0.035). We conclude that opioids inhibit muscular pain more strongly than cutaneous pain in humans. Br J Anaesth 2000; 85: 529-32

Background The authors applied an optimization model (direct search) to find the optimal combination of bupivacaine dose, fentanyl dose, clonidine dose, and infusion rate for continuous postoperative epidural analgesia. Methods One hundred ninety patients undergoing 48-h thoracic epidural analgesia after major abdominal surgery were studied. Combinations of the variables of bupivacaine dose, fentanyl dose, clonidine dose, and infusion rate were investigated to optimize the analgesic effect (monitored by verbal descriptor pain score) under restrictions dictated by the incidence and severity of side effects. Six combinations were empirically chosen and investigated. Then a stepwise optimization model was applied to determine subsequent combinations until no decrease in the pain score after three consecutive steps was obtained. Results Twenty combinations were analyzed. The optimization procedure led to a reduction in the incidence of side effects and in the mean pain scores. The three best combinations of bupivacaine dose (mg/h), fentanyl dose (microg/h), clonidine dose (microg/h), and infusion rate (ml/h) were: 9-21-5-7, 8-30-0-9, and 13-25-0-9, respectively. Conclusions Given the variables investigated, the aforementioned combinations may be the optimal ones to provide postoperative analgesia after major abdominal surgery. Using the direct search method, the enormous number of possible combinations of a therapeutic strategy can be reduced to a small number of potentially useful ones. This is accomplished using a scientific rather than an arbitrary procedure.