Search

This paper describes the new methods of periodontal diagnosis. An outline of the problems of periodontal probing techniques is followed by a discussion of the advances made by the use of constant pressure electronic probes. We finally highlight the problems of periodontal radiographical techniques, leading on to a description of computer-aided radiographic methods--in particular, digital subtraction radiology and computer-assisted linear radiology.

This series will consider the limitations of traditional periodontal diagnostic techniques and the recent advances which have sought to overcome them. It will cover improvements in probing and radiographic techniques and also discusses the attempts to find bacterial or tissue-derived markers which will diagnose or predict periodontal disease activity. The first paper describes the traditional methods of periodontal diagnosis.

The purpose of this study was to compare the tissue resistance to probing and the accuracy of depth determination at different force levels around implants and teeth. In 11 subjects 1 implant and 1 tooth at a comparable location and with comparable probing depth were investigated. The sites were located on either the mesial or distal aspect of the tooth and the implant. A probing device was used which allowed simultaneous monitoring of probing force and probe penetration and which standardized the insertion pathway for repeated measurements. The probing instrument was fitted with an attachment for an aiming device to take a radiograph with the probe tip in the sulcus, using a standardized projection geometry. Probing depth values were determined at 0.25, 0.50, 0.75, 1.00 and 1.25 N probing force. The standard error of the individual measurement (Si), evaluated by comparison of repeated measurements in the same session, was 0.2 mm on implants and 0.1 mm on teeth. For implants there was a trend for slightly better reproducibility at higher force levels. Curve analysis of depth force patterns showed that a change in probing force had more impact on the depth reading in the peri-implant than in the periodontal situation. The mean distance between the probe tip and the peri-implant bone crest amounted to 0.75 +/- 0.60 mm at 0.25 N probing force. It is concluded that peri-implant probing depth measurements are more sensitive to force variation than periodontal pocket probing.

This study compared the intra-examiner and inter-examiner error of 2 constant force probes to the reading of a conventional manual probe. 3 examiners made repeated examinations of attachment level using a modified Florida probe and a manual North Carolina probe (read to 1 mm or 0.5 mm); relative attachment level measurements were made using a Florida disk probe. One probe was used in each quadrant in 8 subjects with moderate to advanced periodontitis. Error was calculated as the mean of the absolute value of the difference between each examination, and the correlation between values at each examination calculated. Statistically-significant differences between probe type, examiners, and sites were detected using a repeated measures ANOVA accounting for the nesting within subjects. There was a significant difference in error by probe type (modified Florida probe 0.62 +/- 0.03 mm, r = 0.86; Florida stent probe 0.55 +/- 0.05 mm, r = 0.82; manual probe to 1 mm 0.39 +/- 0.02 mm, r = 0.88; manual probe to 0.5 mm 0.40 +/- 0.02 mm, r = 0.89; (p < 0.001). Significant differences were observed by examiners (p < 0.01). These data indicate that both manual and controlled-force probes can provide measurement within less than 1 mm of error; however, individual calibration of examiners remains important in the reduction of error.

Three different probing devices (Audio-Probe, Florida-Probe, Peri-Probe) were tested in order to determine the clinical probing depth (CPD) around clinically stable oral implants and their homologous teeth and to evaluate their reproducibility. In all 37 patients, in the age range of 24-80 years, who had undergone periodontal therapy and placement of 1 or more oral implants (ITI), were selected for the study. The CPD was determined on 75 oral implants in total and at 4 sites of both the implants and the control teeth at 3 visits, each 1 week apart. At the 1st visit, the Florida-Probe and the Audio-Probe were used. At the 2nd visit, the Florida-Probe and the Peri-Probe and, at the 3rd visit, again, the Florida-Probe and the Audio-Probe were used. At each visit bleeding on probing (BOP) was registered. A statistically significant (P < 0.05) difference between the mean scores of implant and tooth sites was found showing slightly higher values for implant sites. A tendency for the deeper pockets to bleed more frequently than the shallow pockets was observed. The comparisons of differences of the readings of the Audio-Probe on 2 different occasions were smaller than for the Florida-Probe. However, comparisons between 2 different probes showed significantly greater measurement errors than when comparing the probes alone. There was a tendency for the Peri-Probe to yield the highest and the Audio-Probe the lowest values in inflamed sites. It was concluded that all 3 probing devices appeared to have adequate reproducibility both around teeth and oral implants. For clinical use in daily practice, the Audio-Probe was found to be the most simple device with the highest reproducibility.

Diagnosis of periodontal disease progression involves recording two probing attachment level measurements over an adequate time interval. A diagnostic instrument which exhibits less measurement variability allows for increased sensitivity and earlier disease detection. Traditionally, a manual probe with an occlusal stent of the cementoenamel junction (CEJ) as a reference landmark has been the method of choice. Automated probes that use an occlusal disk as the reference landmark have been developed as an alternative means of measure. The aim of this study was to compare the variability of these two probing methods. Four hundred eleven (411) interproximal sites in 46 untreated periodontitis patients were monitored by a single examiner over a 6-month period. Each site was measured on a monthly basis, first with an automated probe (AP) followed by a manual probe (MP) in combination with a custom-fabricated acrylic stent. Measurement variability of the two probing methods was also compared over a 7-day interval. The AP measurements were significantly more variable than the MP measurements (P < 0.001) when considering the variability between two passes at the same visit. Over the 6-month period, the MP measurements demonstrated significantly more variability than the AP measurements (P < 0.001). It was also noted that MP measurements exhibited more variability at sites with frequent bleeding during the 6 months of the study (P = 0.006). The results of this study demonstrate that AP may have less variability of attachment level measurements over a 6-month period and may be less influenced by local inflammatory changes. However, future comparison studies should include multiple examiners to reduce examiner bias and should alternate the probing method to reduce bias created by local tissue changes from multiple probings.

Two patients were referred to the Graduate Periodontal Clinic, one for placement of dental implants, the other for treatment of advanced periodontal disease. It was determined from an analysis of the Hounsfield scales of bone density from a CT scan that the patient requesting dental implants had severe osteoporotic changes and was, therefore, not a good candidate for the procedure. The second patient's medical history revealed multiple fractures occurring over the years that suggested the presence of osteoporosis. This diagnosis was subsequently confirmed by referral of the patient to an osteoporosis clinic.

Physical periodontal measurement is plagued by many confounders which result in aberrant values. Replicate measurements can reduce the number of aberrant values, the measurement error, and the variance of site-specific measurements. This study aimed to reduce the variance of site-specific measurements by using a new clinical algorithm (the Option-4 algorithm) for an automated disk probe. A single clinician recorded full-mouth relative attachment levels (RAL) at one visit in 32 patients (mean age 45.5 years) with moderately advanced chronic adult periodontitis. RAL was recorded over two passes at six sites per tooth (4,675 sites). The algorithm accepted the first and second pass RALs (RAL1 and RAL2) if their difference was < or = 1 mm, otherwise a maximum of two further RALs (RAL3 and RAL4) were recorded until the difference between any two RALs was < or = 1 mm (SAL1 and SAL2): 4,048 sites (86.6%) required two recordings, 580 sites (12.4%) required three recordings and 47 sites (1%) required four recordings. Correlation coefficients for RAL1 and RAL2 and SAL1 and SAL2 (4,675 sites) were both > or = 0.91 (P = 0.00). Site-specific variances were calculated for RAL1 and RAL2 and SAL1 and SAL2. The mean of the RAL1/RAL2 site-specific variances (A) was 0.45 mm2 (range 0.00 mm2 to 35.28 mm2) whilst the mean of the SAL1/SAL2 variances (B) was 0.09 mm2 (range 0.00 mm2 to 0.5 mm2): the respective medians were 0.08 mm2 and 0.02 mm2. The study demonstrated high intra-examiner RAL reproducibility. The Option-4 algorithm produced an 80% reduction in the mean site-specific variance of RAL1/RAL2 (Y) and a 75% reduction in the median site-specific variance of RAL1/RAL2 (y = [(A - B)/A] x 100).

Most periodontal trials are based on the assumption that the superior treatment, as judged by short-term intangible changes in probing attachment levels (the surrogate), is also the treatment most likely to affect tooth mortality. This assumption is valid if: (1) the surrogate is informative about tooth mortality, and (2) the surrogate captures a substantial proportion of the treatment effect on tooth mortality (e.g., > 50% or 75%). The goal of this study was to evaluate whether both conditions were satisfied in a randomized controlled trial (RCT) of elders at high risk for dental diseases. The results suggested that the first condition for a valid surrogate was satisfied: Both one- and two-year changes in probing attachment level were informative about tooth mortality risk. A 1-mm loss measured over a one-year period was associated with a 56% increased tooth mortality risk (relative risk = 1.56; 95% confidence interval, 1.08 to 2.26; p = 0.017); a 1-mm loss measured over a two-year period was associated with a 102% increased risk for tooth mortality (relative risk = 2.02; 95% confidence interval, 1.26 to 3.25; p = 0.004). The second condition necessary for a valid surrogate could not be confirmed in the present trial. With 95% confidence, it was concluded that one-year changes in probing attachment level measurements did not capture a significant proportion of the treatment effect (point estimate, 6%; 95% confidence interval;-38% to 53%). No useful statements could be made regarding the proportion of treatment effect captured by two-year changes, due to the width of the confidence interval (point estimate, 18%; 95% confidence interval;-151% to 140%). It is concluded that (1) the evidence surrounding the one-year change in probing attachment level indicates that it can be ruled out as being anything more than a weak surrogate marker for tooth mortality, and (2) further research is required to study the validity of two-year change in probing attachment level as a surrogate marker. Due to characteristics of the population and the treatments investigated, the generalizability of these findings to other RCTs is questionable.

This study compared relative attachment levels (RAL) and probable crevice depths (PCD) from 6 periodontal probes (1 third, 4 second, and 1 first generation). A single clinician recorded RAL and PCD in 6 patients with chronic adult periodontitis (mean age 48.2 years) during two visits (interval: 1 week) using a Latin square examination order. Replicate measurements were recorded at the 4 interproximal sites of the Ramford index teeth to examine intra-probe differences. Additional single measurements were recorded at similar sites of units 11, 26, 31 and 46 to investigate interprobe differences. Intra-probe RAL and PCD reproducibility was < or = 1 mm at > 94% of the sites. All intra-probe Pearson correlation coefficients were > 0.85 (P = 0.00). Inter-probe RAL and PCD agreement was < or = 1 mm at > 49% of the sites for RAL and > 61% of the sites for PCD. All inter-probe Pearson correlation coefficients were > 0.42 (P = 0.00) for RAL and > 0.49 (P = 0.00) for PCD. Analyses of variance showed significant differences in RAL and PCD between the first generation probe and the second generation probes (P < 0.005); in RAL between the third generation probe and the first and second generation probes (P = 0.0354); and in PCD between the third generation probe and the first and second generation probes (P = 0.0475). Inter-probe differences were clinically significant in the recorded percentages of pockets > or = 4 mm and > or = 6 mm. Significant inter-probe differences were found in RAL and PCD which have clinical importance in data interpretation and comparison.

Periodontal probing attachment level measurements and intraoral radiographs are used to assess the level of the clinical attachment and bone support in the diagnosis of periodontitis. Together these physical measurements of tooth support comprise the standard against which new diagnostic tests are compared. Since probing and radiographs provide a measure of the severity of attachment or bone loss at one point in time, serial measurements must be compared to determine whether periodontitis is progressive. Periodontal probing may be performed manually or by using controlled force electronic instruments. The resolution, depending on the instrument, will vary from 1.0 mm to 0.1 mm. Variations in probing force, size and shape of tip, location of tip placement, detection or reference landmarks for attachment level probing, degree of gingival inflammation, and transcription may adversely influence accuracy. Electronic probes offer the advantage of improved resolution, force control, and automatic recording, but the literature is inconsistent about the advantages in terms of repeatability and accuracy. Radiographic assessment of alveolar bone loss may be achieved by visual interpretation, measurement, or digital image analysis. While visual interpretation of unstandardized radiographs is insensitive to changes in bone, standardized radiographs can permit measurement of changes on the order of 0.2 mm when computerized methods are used. Newer techniques such as digital subtraction radiography permit detection of bony changes too small to be seen by the unaided eye and are over 95% sensitive and specific in detecting bony changes less than 10 mg.

Concluding that the clinical attachment level at a periodontal site is stable, while in reality it is progressing at a clinically relevant rate, is an example of a false-negative conclusion. No guidelines are currently available to evaluate the likelihood for false-negative conclusions in periodontal clinical trials that monitor disease progression by means of clinical attachment levels. The goal of this study was to estimate the amount of linear disease progression in clinical attachment levels that cannot reliably be detected, when it is truly present. This rate is called the critical linear rate; rates equal to or below this critical linear rate cannot reliably be detected. An equation for determining the critical linear rates for various clinical situations is presented and may provide a rule-of-thumb guideline for the interpretation of negative conclusions. If the critical linear rate for a study is larger than what is considered a clinically relevant disease progression rate, negative conclusions should be interpreted with caution; clinically relevant disease progression might be present, but the diagnostic tools used were too insensitive to detect it. False-negative conclusions may be important in diagnostic trials where low sensitivity can translate into lack of clinical utility.

Attachment loss is the principal clinical indicator for periodontal disease progression. However, the attachment measurement can be inaccurate due to outliers. A remedial scheme, the option-3 scheme, has been suggested in the literature. This scheme involves first measuring the relative attachment twice at any given site. A third measurement is required if there is a large disagreement between the first two probings. When the third measurement is taken, there are several possible ways to make the final assessment of the true attachment level. Among them are the average of the 3 measurements, the average of the closest 2, and the median of the 3. This report evaluates the merits of the option-3 scheme by comparing it with other schemes to reduce measurements variance and outliers. Since true attachment levels are unknown, we chose to check accuracy through measurement consistency between visits in healthy subjects using the fact that such subjects should have little real change in attachment levels. 12 healthy subjects participated in the study. They visited the clinic 4 times in 4 months. Two types of the Florida stent probe were used by 2 calibrated examiners. It was found that option-3 schemes were more accurate than a single probing or duplicate probings in estimating the relative attachment level. The 3 final assessment schemes performed almost equally well from a practical standpoint, but the median was the best among them in a statistical sense.

The reaction of the periodontium to a defined percussive force applied in an orofacial direction can be evaluated by a mobility meter. The elastic and viscous characteristics of the periodontium are evaluated by the device from the contact time between tapping head and the tooth, and reported as a numeric value called the PTV. In this study, the relation between PTVs and bone loss (BL), clinical attachment level (CAL), probing depth, bleeding on probing, and plaque and gingival indices were evaluated in 35 patients with moderate to advanced periodontal disease. The effects of gender, smoking, and initial periodontal therapy on PTVs were also evaluated. Repeated measures analysis of variance was used to determine whether the relationship between PTVs with CAL and BL was dependent on tooth type. Stepwise multiple linear regression was used to test which of the clinical parameters and bone loss would produce the highest predictive value with PTVs. The effects of gender and smoking on PTVs were examined by analysis of covariance. The changes in clinical parameters and PTVs before and after treatment were evaluated by repeated analysis of variance. PTVs were found to give the highest predictive value with bone loss. However, the correlation was observed to be dependent on the location of the tooth in the jaw and the tooth type. Interproximal and midpoint clinical attachment level measurements showed that PTVs correlated more strongly with the overall support, rather than the support on the direction of the percussive movement. No pronounced differences of PTVs were noted between gender. PTVs of smokers were observed to be higher than non-smokers. There was no significant change of PTVs after the initial phase of periodontal therapy. This cross-sectional study shows that the mobility meter evaluation was primarily related to the amount of bone loss while being significantly affected by the location of the tooth in the jaw. Factors such as severity of gingival and sulcular inflammation, oral hygiene, and gender do not seem to have an effect on PTVs.

Numerous indicators for disease progression have been described in the last decade. The purpose of this study was to examine, longitudinally, a large battery of clinical, microbiological, and immunological indicators, to try to determine whether the presence of one or a combination of these parameters at baseline, would correlate positively with increased attachment and or bone loss (true prognostic factors). Following initial screening, 79 patients with established periodontitis were monitored longitudinally for one year. Whole mouth clinical measurements, plaque gingival and calculus indices, together with pocket depth and attachment level measurements, were repeated every three months. Full mouth radiographic survey, performed at baseline and 12 months, served to determine changes in crestal bone height using an image enhancement technique. Subgingival plaque samples were taken at baseline and every 3 months. Immunofluorescence assays were performed for the a battery of target microorganisms. Serum and GCF samples for IgG subclasses analysis were obtained at each visit and assayed using ELISA techniques. Likewise blood, samples were also drawn at each visit for a quantitative analysis of serum cotinine level. The overall mean attachment loss (AL) and bone loss (BL) were almost identical (0.159 mm and 0.164 mm, respectively). Individual patients variation was large (-0.733 to +1.004 mm). An overall 6.89% of sites were active; individual patients' means ranged from 0-28.9%. Mean pocket depth (PD) showed minimal change over the study period (-0.033 mm) thus suggesting that most if not all the AL was accompained by concomitant gingival recession. Smokers exhibited greater AL and radiographic BL compared to non-smokers. Likewise, patients' cotinine level showed direct correlation with outcomes of progressive periodontal breakdown. Past severity of periodontal involvement, as reflected in the patients baseline PD, AL and crestal bone height, showed good correlation with longitudinal changes in the periodontium. This correlation was higher for crestal BL as the outcome variable, while somewhat smaller for change in AL as the outcome variable. Bacteroides forsythus (Bf.), Prevotella intermedia (Pi.) and Porphyromonas gingivalis (Pg.) were frequently found in these patients. The presence of these microorganisms at baseline was associated with further disease progression. Subjects with mean baseline pocket depth equal or greater than 3.2 mm were at greater risk for future bone loss 1 year later (O.R. 2.97; C.I. 1.02-8.70). Smokers were at significantly greater risk for further attachment loss when compared to non-smokers (O.R. 5.41; C.I. 1.50-19.5). Subjects that harbored B. forsythus at baseline, were at seven times greater risk for increased pocket depth (O.R. 7.84; C.I.1.74-35.3). In conclusion, past periodontal destruction, smoking habits, Bf., Pg., & Pi. are prognostic factors for further periodontal breakdown. When designing clinical trials, or when evaluating epidemiological data, it is most important to balance for these factors. Also, treatment strategies should attempt to eliminate or modify these factors.

A technique is presented for calculating the amount of bone support as a percentage of the total tooth length measured on intra oral x-ray pictures. An evaluation was made of differences in total tooth length of 1128 teeth recorded in 1979 and in 1989. The differences found in the ten year period were minimal (0.3%). Between 1979 and 1989 0.7% or 2 mm of the bone support was lost. The accuracy obtainable by the use of measurements from x-ray pictures taken by trained personnel was found to be satisfactory. This indicate that the method could be of value for comparison of changes in mesial and distal bone support over a period of time. The advantages of using bone support measurements instead of attachment level measurements are several: ease of reevaluation of initial values, the patient does not have to be present the whole time, and properly trained dental assistants can make the measurements.

The ultimate goal of both resective and regenerative periodontal procedures is the creation of soft- and hard-tissue architecture that is consistent with periodontal health. Osseous resective procedures predictably produce minimal clinical probing depth, but sacrifice periodontal support. An alternative method to treat anatomic defects not easily managed through resection is guided tissue regeneration (GTR). GTR provides clinicians with the opportunity to reverse the disease-related loss of periodontal attachment. However, at present, the outcomes of GTR procedures have not been shown to be predictable. Continued improvements in techniques and materials, and identification of patient-related factors significant to the success of the GTR procedures, should enhance the consistency of the clinical outcomes. An evidence-based approach to the use of both regenerative and resective therapies will enhance the clinical results achieved through these procedures.

This study describes the variations in the reproducibility of attachment level recordings for different subjects at different examinations. Twenty patients with different degrees of periodontal disease were recruited and examined bi-monthly for their attachment levels using an electronic probe in two quadrants and a conventional probe in the other two quadrants. At each of the 7 examinations attachment level recordings were repeated with the appropriate probe after approximately 30 minutes. Results demonstrate that the reproducibility of attachment level recordings was slightly better for the conventional probe than for the electronic probe. Attachment level recording reproducibility varied considerably between subjects and between examinations for the same subject. Aggregation of attachment level recordings in the form of mean tooth values or mean individual values reduced the range of the differences, but considerable between-subject and between-examination variation was still seen. These results indicate that no single uniformly valid estimate of attachment level reproducibility exists which can be used to set diagnostic thresholds such that a minimum number of incorrect diagnoses are made.

In order to examine the relationship of possible crevicular biochemical parameters to attachment loss (ALOSS), 330 sites from 8 untreated adult patients were monitored longitudinally at 3-month intervals, for up to 1 year. Attachment levels were measured with a force-sensing probe and an acrylic stent in duplicates at each study point. Crevicular samples were collected and used for the determination of the following 11 markers: number of polymorphonuclear leukocytes (PMNs), prostaglandin E2 (PGE2), osteocalcin (OC), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), collagenase (COL), beta-glucuronidase (BG), antigenic and functional elastase (AEL and FEL), alpha-1 antitrypsin (a1AT), alpha-2 macroglobulin (a2M) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST). 10 sites with ALOSS of > or = 1.5 mm per 3 months (active sites) and 43 sites with negligible changes (inactive sites) were identified. Total amounts of ALP, BG and COL were found to be significantly higher in active as compared to inactive sites, prior to significant ALOSS, without any significant differences in crevicular fluid volume and clinical indices. When biochemical parameters were expressed as ratios to the number of PMNs, PGE2/ PMNs was significantly elevated in active sites. The capacity of such individual parameters to distinguish between active and inactive sites was limited. However, linear discriminant analysis using total amounts of PGE2, COL, ALP, a2M, OC and AEL showed more significant diagnostic values (sensitivity: 80%, specificity: 91%). These findings suggest that the combination of several biochemical parameters in crevicular fluid could give more information to predict future clinical ALOSS.

Objectives: The aims of this study were to assess the validity of the WHO 621 probe for the detection of subgingival calculus and to assess the effect of subgingival calculus on the measurement of probing pocket depths and clinical attachment levels., Methods: Teeth used in the study were designated for extraction under local analgesia. Prior to extraction the clinical detection of subgingival calculus was made with a WHO 621 probe. Probing pocket depths and clinical attachment levels were measured. The location and direction of the gingival margin and probing measurements were marked on the teeth with a fine, sterile pencil and following extraction, permanent reference grooves were cut with a fine, tapered diamond bur. The extracted teeth were stained with Gomori's stain and examined for the presence of calculus, and the pocket depths and attachment levels were measured using a stereomicroscope., Results: There was an 80% agreement between the clinical and laboratory detection of subgingival calculus. There was no systematic difference between clinical and histopathological measurements when calculus was present or absent (P > 0.05). Analysis of variance indicated a random error effect due to the presence of subgingival calculus., Conclusion: This study has demonstrated the validity of the WHO 621 probe in detecting subgingival calculus and has shown that subgingival calculus could be a source of error in the measurement of probing depths and clinical attachment levels.

The furcation involvement of 100 molars in 25 patients suffering from moderate to advanced periodontitis was investigated. The horizontal probing attachment level (PAL-H) within the furcations was assessed 2x within 2 weeks using the pressure-calibrated (0.25 N) flexible plastic universal explorer version of the TPS probe (TPS). To determine the measurement error of PAL-H assessments, the standard deviation of single measurements was calculated. The measurements were repeated using a colour-coded Nabers probe and compared to the TPS assessments. 253 furcations were evaluated (100 buccal, 47 lingual, 53 mesiolingual and 53 distolingual, respectively). For buccal, lingual, mesiolingual and distolingual furcations, the standard deviations were 0.486 mm, 0.598 mm, 0.846 mm, 1.039 mm, respectively. Measurement error was less in buccal and lingual furcations than in mesiolingual and distolingual sites (p < 0.005). The agreement of replicate measurements of furcation degrees was excellent for buccal and lingual furcations (weighted kappa [standard error] 0.824 [0.076] and 0.779 [0.107], respectively), but only moderate for mesiolingual and distolingual furcations (weighted kappa 0.688 [0.096] and 0.544 [0.101], respectively). Only in distolingual sites there was a significant (p < 0.025; paired t-test) underestimation of PAL-H by the TPS as compared to the Nabers probe. At all locations the TPS underestimated furcation degrees significantly (p < 0.1; Stuart-Maxwell's chi 2) as compared to Nabers probe. Measurement error of mesiolingual and distolingual furcations was significantly higher than of buccal or lingual sites. The reproducibility of PAL-H measurements in furcations using TPS is comparable to data published for scorings with colour-coded Nabers probes. Through and through furcations are likely to be underestimated by using the flexible plastic version of the TPS probe. Hence, it seems to be unsuitable for a proper assessment of the degree of furcation involvement.

This study determined the relative contribution to probing measurement reliability of several factors, compared with that of random error. Probing measurements were performed by examiners properly trained and calibrated. A total of 5771 pairs of replicate pocket depth (PD) and relative attachment level (RAL) measurements were performed with the Florida Probe. A total of 1488 replicate clinical attachment level (CAL) measurements were performed with the North Carolina 15 mm probe. In addition, longitudinal replicate measurements of RAL were performed at 0 and 12 months on 816 sites in 11 patients utilizing the Florida Probe 20 mm disk probe. Measurement reliability with the Florida Probe resulted in mean intraexaminer variances of 0.21 and 0.33, for PD and RAL, respectively (s.e.m. 0.46 mm for PD and 0.57 mm for RAL). Measurement reliability with the conventional probe resulted in mean intra-examiner variances of 0.19 for PD and 0.32 for CAL (s.e.m. 0.44 mm and 0.56 mm). Pocket depth contributed to = 5% of the variability of the intra-examiner variance with both probes with other contributing factors being the individual patient, tooth and site location. Mean intra-examiner reproducibility for duplicate RAL measurement performed at 0 and 12 months was 0.24 and 0.19, respectively (s.e.m. 0.49 mm and 0.43 mm). In conclusion, a mean intra-examiner variance of < or = 0.24 can be achieved for replicate measurements with both electronic and conventional probes for moderate and severe periodontitis patients. Individual examiner, individual patient and site location contribute up to 10% to the overall variance. Hence, the pattern of variability for intra-examiner variance of probing measurements performed with either electronic or conventional probes by trained and calibrated examiners is mostly random error.

The purpose of this study is to determine whether gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) elastase total activity (TA) and concentration (EC) correlate with and predict progressive attachment loss (AL). 75 previously untreated patients with moderate periodontitis were recruited. GCF was collected from 16 molar and premolar mesiobuccal sites and probing attachment loss (PAL), probing depth (PPD), gingival index (GI), gingival bleeding index (GBI) and plaque index (Pl.I) were measured. PAL and PPD were measured with an electronic, constant pressure probe. Patients were given basic periodontal treatment prior to baseline when the above procedures were repeated. In addition, carefully localised radiographs were taken of the test teeth and repeated annually. Patients were seen at 3 months intervals to 2 years and the procedures were repeated. 119 AL sites were detected and 89 of these were rapid AL sites (RAL) and 30 were gradual AL sites (GAL). Elastase levels (TA & EC) at RAL sites were significantly higher (p < or = 0.0001) than paired control sites in the same patient at both the attachment loss time (ALT) and the prediction time (PT). The mean levels (TA & EC) over the study period at GAL sites were significantly higher (p < or = 0.0001) than paired control sites in the same patient. Using a critical value (CV) of 125 micronsU/30 s (TA) and 400 micronsU/micronsL (EC) in 2 x 2 contingency tables showed a sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 99.95% (TA) and a sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 99.91% (EC) at the PT with very similar values at the ALT. Patient level comparisons showed that the mean elastase levels (TA & EC) were significantly higher (p < or = 0.0001) at RAL and GAL sites than non-attachment loss (NAL) sites in AL patients and that the mean levels were significantly higher (p < or = 0.0001) in AL patients than NAL patients. All these results indicate that these CVs for GCF elastase activity may serve as a predictors of future attachment loss.

This study compares the evaluation of periodontal health using bone levels measured on periapical and bitewing radiographs with clinical parameters, such as periodontal screening and recording, gingival indexes, probing depths and attachment levels. The authors found that bitewing radiographs taken within six months of the clinical examination correlated better with the clinical data than older radiographs. However, they concluded that, overall, radiographs are not highly reflective of periodontal status. PSR scores, by contrast, showed significant associations with probing depths and attachment levels. The results support use of PSR as a screening tool for periodontal diseases.

The aim of this prospective study was to characterize an implant patient population exhibiting clinical signs of peri-implantitis and to determine subsequently the incidence of progressive attachment loss. The predictive values of diagnostic parameters were evaluated. 25 patients with 54 endosseous implants that had been loaded for 41 +/- 15 months were included in the study. Clinical parameters included the assessment of plaque, bleeding on probing, probing depth, attachment levels, and Periotest values. Probing measurements were performed in duplicate by means of a controlled force electronic probe (Periprobe). Peri-implant crevicular fluid samples were collected and assayed for neutral proteolytic enzyme (NPE) activity (Periocheck). Analysis of duplicate baseline probing data revealed a high degree of reproducibility (mean difference: 0.1 +/- 0.3 mm). A minimum threshold of 1.0 mm (> 3 x S.D.) loss of probing attachment was chosen to classify a site as positive for breakdown. Alternatively, the tolerance method was employed to identify sites with progressive attachment loss. After 6 months, irrespective of the analytical method, 6 percent of all sites (in 19% of the implants) and 28% of the patients had experienced further peri-implant attachment loss. There were significant differences (p < 0.05) in mean plaque (73% vs. 45%) and NPE (36% vs. 12%) scores between patients with progressive peri-implantitis and those with stable peri-implant conditions. Both bleeding on probing and the NPE-test were characterized by high negative predictive values, and thus negative scores can serve as indicators for stable peri-implant conditions. For monitoring peri-implant health during recall visits, attachment level recordings with a controlled force electronic probe in conjunction with enzymatic diagnostic tests of the host response can be recommended.

There is a need for information on the validity of probing depth and attachment level measurements made with automated probes. In this study, 34 teeth in 9 patients were measured with the Florida probe from points marked with a bur prior to extraction. After extraction, connective tissue attachment levels were measured from the same points with a dissecting microscope. Mean measurements of attachment level were similar with probing (5.13 +/- 2.08 mm) and laboratory (5.18 +/- 2.26 mm) assessments. The correlation between these measurements was 0.72 (p < 0.001), and a t-test of the paired measurements showed no difference (t = 0.44; p = 0.66). The Florida probe thus showed satisfactory validity for this group of measurements of advanced periodontitis. However, there was substantial lack of agreement between individual probing measurements and the validity criterion of laboratory attachment level measurements, and the intra-class correlation coefficient was 0.46. It was concluded that the Florida probe was suitable for studies in which measurements were averaged, but not for longitudinal study of individual sites.

The present study was carried out to compare the ability of different methods of periodontal assessment to identify those subjects in a population who had suffered the worst periodontal breakdown. Comparisons were made between full mouth approximal attachment loss (CAL) assessment and methods relying on pocket probing depth (PPD) evaluation or on partial recording of CAL or PPD. Both of the latter types of assessment are commonly used in epidemiological surveys. 202 workers at an electronics factory aged between 20 and 40 yr were examined for approximal PPD and CAL, excluding third molars. The data were used to determine which individuals had the worst periodontitis based on CAL at several thresholds. Further analysis was carried out to determine which of these subjects would have been identified on the basis of the presence of deep (> or = 6 mm) pocketing, or by using one of a battery of partial recording subsets. CAL was frequently present in the absence of deep pocketing. A subset made up of four approximal sites around each of the 10 index teeth recommended by the WHO for partial recording (two molars in each quadrant and maxillary right and mandibular left central incisors) and a subset comprising maxillary buccal and mandibular lingual sites ("Pritchard" sites) performed best of the subsets considered in identifying the subjects who had been found by full mouth assessment to have at least one or at least two approximal sites with CAL at thresholds of 2, 3 or 4 mm. It was concluded that measurements of CAL using either of these subsets should reduce problems of under-recording of the prevalence of periodontitis associated with the use of PPDs alone or on CAL assessment at other partial recording subsets.

The aim of the present study was to investigate whether incipient periodontal disease breakdown could be associated with changes in gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) acute-phase protein levels. In addition, the potential of clinical indices to act as predictors of significant attachment level (AL) change was investigated. AL measurements were taken at baseline and 3 months using the Florida Probe stent handpiece from a total of 384 sites in 38 patients. The average standard deviation of duplicate AL measurements was 0.423. When the tolerance method was used to detect significant AL change, 3.9% of the sites lost attachment. When a less stringent criterion of AL change of > or = 1 mm was used 9.9% of the sites lost attachment during the 3-month period. With the exception of probing depth, baseline clinical parameters failed to predict AL change. Fourteen active periodontitis sites that demonstrated significant attachment loss were paired to stable periodontitis sites within the same patient. The levels of four acute-phase proteins, namely alpha 2-macroglobulin (alpha 2-M), alpha 1-antitrypsin (alpha 1-AT), transferrin (TF) and lactoferrin (LF), and also albumin (Alb) were assessed in the same gingival crevicular fluid sample using sandwich ELISAs. Results were expressed either as ng/30 s and ng/microgram Alb. Acute-phase protein levels in GCF failed to differentiate between active and stable periodontitis sites at baseline. In conclusion, the degree of gingival inflammation of the tissues adjacent to the crevice/pocket seems to influence the levels of protease inhibitors and iron-binding proteins in GCF to a greater extent than probing attachment loss.

Our present method for clinical evaluation of marginal periodontal tissues involves examination for bleeding and suppuration and the measurement of probing depth. There is little doubt that this method provides useful guidelines for evaluation of the overall periodontal status of dentitions. On an individual-site basis, however, it has limitations in the identification of locations prone to disease progression. So far, there is no reliably clinical, microbiologic, or other method to predict or identify sites with disease activity (i.e., ongoing loss of attachment). Therefore, there are no clear guidelines for distinguishing between active and arrested lesions. A treatment resulting in a plaque-free mouth with nonbleeding and shallow probing depths throughout the dentition will reduce the risk of residual, active disease. Such a result, although desirable, is not realistic for many patients. Therefore, the clinician is faced with the delicate task of evaluating sites with various grades of involvement using current clinical methods of examination.

Objective: The aim of this study is to determine whether gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) dipeptidyl peptidase (DPP) II or IV levels, total activity (TA) and concentration (EC), predict progressive attachment loss (AL)., Subjects and Methods: Seventy five patients with moderate periodontitis were recruited. GCF was first collected from 16 molar and premolar mesiobuccal sites and then probing attachment level (PAL) and probing pocket depth (PPD) were measured with an electronic probe. Finally, gingival index, gingival bleeding and plaque indices were scored. Patients were given basic periodontal treatment prior to baseline after which the above procedures were repeated. Patients were seen 3 monthly for 2 years and the procedures were repeated. Carefully localised radiographs were taken of the test teeth annually., Results: One hundred and twenty AL sites, 88 rapid AL (RAL) and 32 gradual AL (GrAL), in 48 patients were detected. DPP II and IV levels (TA and EC) at RAL sites were significantly higher (P < or = 0.0001) than paired control sites at the attachment loss time (ALT) and prediction time (PT). Mean levels over the study period of both proteases (TA and EC) at GrAL sites were significantly higher (P < or = 0.0001) than other paired control sites. The GCF levels of DPP IV were always slightly higher than those of DPP II. Critical values (CV) of 5 microU per 30 s (TA) and 25 microU microL(-1) (EC) for both proteases showed high sensitivity and specificity values for TA and EC and these were the same at both ALT and PT. The positive predictive values were slightly higher for DPP II. Mean site DPP II and IV levels (TA and EC) in intra-patient comparisons were significantly higher (P < or = 0.0001) at RAL and GrAL sites than non-attachment loss (NAL) sites in AL patients and mean patient levels were significantly higher (P < or = 0.0001) in AL patients than NAL patients in inter-patient comparisons., Conclusions: These results indicate that both GCF DPP II and IV may be predictors of periodontal attachment loss.

This study evaluated intra- and inter-examiner reproducibility for a conventional manual probe versus a computer-interfaced force-controlled periodontal probe. 2 examiners recorded probing depths (PD) and relative attachment levels (AL) at 1128 sites in 15 periodontal maintenance patients. Each site was evaluated 2x, 7 to 10 days apart by both examiners. Probing force for the electronic probe was 15 g. PD intra-examiner reproducibility (within +/- 1.0 mm) for shallow sites (PD < or = 3 mm) was 98.6% versus 91.5% for the conventional versus the electronic probe for examiner 1 and 98.5% versus 88.7% for examiner 2. Corresponding values for deeper sites (PD > 3 mm) were 96.4% versus 85.9% for examiner 1 and 95.1% versus 77.0% for examiner 2. Generally, AL intra-examiner reproducibility was 1 to 3% lower than for PD. PD inter-examiner reproducibility (within +/- 1.0 mm) was 99.2% versus 90.7% for the conventional versus the electronic probe, respectively, for shallow sites and 95.4% versus 76.9% for deeper sites. AL inter-examiner reproducibility (within +/- 1.0 mm) was 1 to 5% lower than for PD. Both intra- and inter-examiner reproducibility was higher for anterior than for posterior sites. Mean PD and AL were similar for both examiners. However, the electronic probe consistently recorded 0.1 to 0.2 mm higher values than the conventional probe. Standard deviations indicated a greater variability for electronic than for manual probing. The results suggest that intra- and inter-examiner reproducibility may not necessarily be higher with an electronic, force-controlled periodontal probe than with a conventional manual probe.

A reproducible and sensitive laser Doppler periodontal probe has recently been developed for intrasulcular measurement of gingival blood flow. The specific aims of this investigation were to determine the relation between intrasulcular laser Doppler readings (LDR) and traditional diagnostic criteria as well as to evaluate the response to root planning in terms of LDR and traditional criteria. LDR and clinical measurements (bleeding on probing (BOP), probing depth (PD) and clinical attachment loss (CAL) were obtained from 2 healthy and 2 diseased sites in 30 systemically healthy adult volunteers with localized moderate to advanced periodontitis. All 30 subjects were re-examined 1 month following root planing while 10 subjects were re-examined at approximately 1 year after treatment. Subject-adjusted correlations between pretreatment LDR and PD as well as LDR and CAL were 0.74 and 0.71, respectively. 1 month following root planing, the diseased sites had undergone a significant reduction in LDR and PD with an accompanying gain in CAL. Prior to treatment, 95 of 120 sites (79%) agreed on an ordinal classification (high, low) for LDR and BOP. Mantel-Haenszel common odds ratios for agreement between LDR and BOP were 9.6 pre-treatment and 4.3 one month after treatment. A slight rebound of all measurements was noted in a group of 10 subjects followed for 1 year. It was concluded that the laser Doppler periodontal probe is an unbiased non-invasive method of monitoring the response to periodontal therapy.

Clarification of the reliability associated with probing attachment level measurements and with diagnostic rules derived from them is necessary to examine the potential of these measurements as reliable markers of the disease process and as an outcome measure in clinical treatment studies. The purpose of the present study was to describe and compare the longitudinal reliability of single and double probing attachment level measurable by estimating false positive and false negative rates. In 20 systemically healthy adults with untreated advanced adult periodontitis, probing attachment levels and probing depth were measured at 6 sites in all teeth at the start of the study, and every 30 days thereafter for 11 months. Attachment levels were double measured, using acrylic onlays providing reference points and an electronic pressure sensitive probe. Attachment loss from baseline of 2.5 mm or more was used to accept dynamic attachment loss. The statistical methods for the cross-sectional analysis included mean absolute differences between double measurements and cross-correlations. Longitudinal analyses, expressing estimates of diagnostic error rates were made using maximum likelihood methods. 5 measurement protocols were compared. The results showed that the mean absolute difference between replicate measurements was 0.095 mm in bicuspids and 0.107 mm in molars. The mean absolute differences decreased over time from 0. 128 mm in visit 3 to 0.08 mm in visit 7. Correlation coefficients for replicate measurements were higher than 0.98. In general, false positive rates were markedly lower (< or = 0.02) than false negative rates (< or = 0.31). The relative sample size required to obtain comparable statistical power, was minimized in premolars when using the first of 2 measurements or the mean of 2 measurements, and in molars when using the first of 2 measurements. The methodology used in the present study provides guidelines for designing clinical studies which maintain statistical power by balancing off examiner reliability and sample size.

A problem associated with probing measurement is that important site-specific change may be obscured by measurement variability. Furthermore, if many sites are monitored there is an increasing likelihood that any particular "detected change" might be the result of this measurement error. Since error and multiplicity effects would tend to increase mouth-wise false positive rate, demanding decision thresholds are often set. However, imposition of difficult criteria, increases site-wise false negative rate and therefore reduces utility in the clinical setting. Evaluation of mean change might sometimes be a useful alternative, but also problematic as a few dramatic site-level losses can be inconsequential among many stable or improving sites. A strategy is proposed for evaluating probing changes in a single patient, which is based on the statistical evaluation of two attributes of the change distribution. (1) Disease progression is concluded when mean probing loss increases over time, and (2) a clinically relevant asymmetry is concluded when the distribution tail corresponding to loss is skewed. Computerized simulation was used to determine alpha-error for tests of mean and skew, for three different distributions of probing change. Actual alpha-error was shown to be near nominal levels. Power was estimated as a function of the number and magnitude of sites with probing loss and as a function of whether there was change in both mean and skew or in skew alone. Under most conditions studied, simultaneous tests for skew and mean provided enhanced power relative to a test for loss alone and would appear to offer the clinician an additional statistical context for appraising disease status.

A total of 1,128 sites in 15 periodontal maintenance patients were examined twice, 7 to 10 days apart, to evaluate reproducibility of periodontal probing by a conventional manual and an automated force-controlled electronic probe. Probing depths (PD) and relative attachment levels (AL) were recorded to the nearest 0.5 mm with both instruments. At each visit, all sites were probed first with the conventional and then with the electronic probe. Reproducibility of PD at shallow sites (PD < or = 3 mm) by the manual probe was 59.1% for exact agreement and 98.6% within +/- 1.0 mm variation. For the electronic probe, corresponding values were 41.3% and 91.5%, respectively. Reproducibility of PD measurements at deeper sites (PD > 3 mm), was 33.0% for exact match and 96.4% within +/- 1.0 mm for the manual and, correspondingly, 31.7% and 85.9% for the electronic probe. Reproducibility of AL followed a similar pattern, but was consistently lower than for PD. Reproducibility was consistently higher for anterior than for posterior sites and, for some comparisons, higher in the maxilla than in the mandible. These differences were smaller for the manual than for the electronic probe. Time required to complete the probing was longer for the conventional probe than for the electronic instrument. Under the prevailing study conditions, the automated force-controlled electronic probe failed to offer significant advantages over the conventional manual probe.

As with all indices which impose numerical scales on a biological process, there are limitations with CPITN which must be identified and recognised. The limitations are due to the index being used for purposes for which it was not originally designed and recent advances in understanding which question the underlying assumptions of the index. Whilst questioning whether these limitations are sufficient to abandon the CPITN in favour of a new index, suggestions are made for modifications to the existing system. These include, the recording of each of the clinical indicators separately, as well as including the measurement of total loss of attachment. In addition an extension of the treatment need scale from four to five points is suggested.

Periodontal health reflects a balance between harmful and protective elements in the gingival margin area. The total plaque mass, specific periodontopathogens, and local environmental factors may challenge this balance. The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the effect of proximal root grooves as a risk factor in periodontal attachment loss. One-hundred and three (103) extracted, formalin-stored, single-rooted teeth showing loss of attachment and having one non-grooved and one grooved proximal root surface were selected for the study. Following staining in 0.1% toluidine blue to visualize attached periodontal ligament remnants, the teeth were examined in a light microscope under incident light. On each tooth, loss of attachment was measured along the long axis of the root from the cemento-enamel junction to the most coronal level of the stained periodontal ligament remnants on mesial as well as on distal surfaces. Incisors and premolars were grouped separately. For both groups, a statistically significant greater loss of attachment was present on grooved than on non-grooved surfaces (P < 0.0001). Generally, there was a direct relationship between groove location and maximum loss of attachment. The results indicate that proximal root grooves should be considered in periodontal diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment planning.

The purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of within subject and within tooth variability of attachment-level measurements on hypothesis testing. Full-mouth attachment-level measurements were obtained at 4 sites per tooth in early onset periodontitis subjects (both localized N = 89 and generalized N = 139) and adult periodontitis subjects (N = 309). Variance component models utilizing iterative generalized least squares were employed to estimate the % of variance distributed at the level of the site, tooth and subject in the 3 subject populations. The data indicate that a significant % of the variance is distributed within the tooth and the subject. Ignoring the variance attributable to teeth or subjects can result in inappropriately low type I error rates for hypothesis testing. Thus, both the subjects and the tooth must be considered in the modeling of attachment level measurements. Also in studies in which a limited number of samples are taken, data analysis would be simplified if these samples were taken from different teeth.

Objective, reliable, and valid diagnostic criteria are required for studies of HIV-associated periodontal conditions. A set of diagnostic criteria were devised based on a literature review and the clinical experience of the authors. Validity was assessed by comparison with clinical photographs and the criteria were evaluated and refined for ease of use and objectivity. To assess the reliability of the criteria, 9 experienced examiners were shown 20 clinical photographs accompanied by brief vignettes of clinical information. Each examiner was asked to identify signs evident in a particular area of the photograph and to record a diagnosis. Five examiners were then trained and calibrated in the use of the criteria. Finally, all 9 examiners were shown the original 20 photographs and asked to identify signs and record diagnoses. The examiners showed only fair reliability in the recognition of clinical signs, made diagnoses intuitively, and had only fair agreement on the diagnosis of periodontal diseases. The inter-examiner reliability of examiners trained and calibrated in the use of the criteria increased and was greater than among untrained examiners. Rigid diagnostic criteria are essential in epidemiologic studies. Inter-examiner reliability will be increased if examiners are trained in their use and calibrated in the recognition of clinical signs. Diagnostic criteria should be modified as understanding of the diseases they classify increases. The proposed criteria will enhance the value of studies of HIV-associated periodontal changes and will contribute to that understanding.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical effects of a single application of a 5% metronidazole collagen device in periodontal pockets deeper than 5 mm, in association with debridement and without reinforcement of home care and hygiene as practiced by the patient at any time. Pocket depth, attachment level, bleeding on probing, gingival index and plaque index were assessed at baseline, and on days 15, 30 and 90. Analysis of data from 28 patients indicated that both debridement and metronidazole therapy decreased pocket depth, bleeding on probing and gingival index, but results were significantly better with metronidazole. These results indicate that topical metronidazole provides an effective adjunctive treatment of advanced periodontitis.