Search

This article collects the evidence that shows that the biological reactions to Silica are due to the stimulation of the Immune System. Both Innate and Adaptive Immunity are involved. The following sets of events take place sequentially: (1) Silica is recognized as a PAMP (pathogen-associated molecular pattern) by the Receptors of Innate Immunity; (2) This causes the stimulation first and then the death of the key cells of Innate Immunity (the macrophages); (3) While stimulated, macrophages produce cytokines (IL-1 and TNF) that stimulate fibroblasts; (4) The same and possibly other cytokines produced by silica- activated macrophages induce the maturation of dendritic cells, which are the connecting elements between the Innate and the Adaptive (lymphoid) Immune Systems; (5) It follows a polyclonal activation of the Adaptive Immunity; (6) The end result is the formation of fibro-hyaline tissue. In view of the double involvement of the Innate and the Adaptive Immune Systems and their cooperation in the stimulation of fibrosis, Silicosis can be considered as a "Collagen" Disease, related to other diseases of that group like Rheumatoid Arthritis, Lupus erythematosus and Scleroderma. Not surprisingly the incidence of these Diseases has been shown to be significantly increased in human exposed to Silica.

As barriers to xenotransplantation are surmounted, such as suppression of hyperacute rejection allowing improved graft survival, it becomes important to define longer-term host-xenograft interactions. To this end we have prepared in baboons high titer anti-alpha-Galactosyl (alphaGal) and anti-porcine aortic endothelial cell antibodies, similar to human natural xenoantibodies and reactive with epitopes of thyroglobulin, laminin, and heparan sulfate proteoglycans. When injected into pigs with a protocol similar to that used in the rat to show the nephritogenic potential of heterologous anti-laminin and anti-heparan sulfate proteoglycan antibodies, baboon immunoglobulins bound first to renal vascular endothelium, and later to interstitial cells, especially fibroblasts and macrophages, and to antigens in basement membranes and extracellular matrix, where they colocalized with laminin- and heparan sulfate proteoglycan-antibodies, and with bound Griffonia simplicifolia B4. A similar binding was observed in other organs. The pigs did not develop an acute complement-dependent inflammation, but rather chronic lesions of the basement membranes and the extracellular matrix. Incubation of renal fibroblasts with baboon anti-alpha-Galactosyl antibodies resulted in increased synthesis of transforming growth factor-beta and collagen, suggesting a possible basis for the fibrotic response. The results demonstrate that in this experimental model a consequence of alphaGal antibody interaction with porcine tissues, is immunoreactivity with alphaGal on matrix molecules and interstitial cells, priming mechanisms leading to fibrosis resembling that in chronic allograft rejection. The possibility that similar lesions may develop in long-surviving pig xenografts is discussed.

The interaction of antibodies with cell surface antigens may induce redistribution of immune complexes, followed by antigen depletion, with increased resistance to injurious effect of antibody and complement (antigenic modulation). Human natural antibodies to Gal alpha 1,3Gal beta 1,4GlcNAc-R (alpha Gal) epitopes expressed at the surface of pig cells are a major obstacle to xenotransplantation. Recent studies have shown that these antibodies do not modulate alpha Gal, but the morphological consequences of the antigen-antibody interaction are unknown. Pig blood and endothelial cells, were exposed to baboon alpha-Gal antibodies, and studied by immunofluorescence and phase contrast microscopy, flow cytometry, and inhibition enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. In cells studied at 4 degrees C or fixed, alpha Gal was diffusely expressed at the surface. After cross-linking at 37 degrees C, antigenic modulation did not occur, but granular redistribution of alpha Gal immune complexes was seen in all cell types. In other systems a similar redistribution is known to induce perturbation of the plasma membrane/cytoskeletal structure with changes in adhesive properties, gene regulation, and T cell activation, which could be important if pig xenografts will be made to survive for prolonged periods.

Naive T cells mount a vigorous proliferative response to superantigen (SAg) stimulation in vivo. The proliferative response is followed by a partial deletion of responder T cells. Part of the deletion process has recently been attributed to the action of regulatory cytotoxic T cells that recognize major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I-associated antigen receptor determinants on the target cell surface. Responder T cells that survived the SAg response were found to be incapable of generating a secondary proliferative response to a SAg challenge. We show here that this 'anergy' is enforced by CD8-positive regulatory suppressive T cells. These regulatory cells inhibit cell division of preactivated T cells but not the Sag response of naive T cells. Regulatory T cells are not generated in the presence of cyclosporin A and, once activated, become inactivated or deleted when restimulated in the presence of this immunosuppressive drug.

Vaccination of mice with activated autoantigen-reactive CD4(+) T cells (T cell vaccination, TCV) has been shown to induce protection from the subsequent induction of a variety of experimental autoimmune diseases, including experimental allergic encephalomyelitis (EAE). Although the mechanisms involved in TCV-mediated protection are not completely known, there is some evidence that TCV induces CD8(+) regulatory T cells that are specific for pathogenic CD4(+) T cells. Previously, we demonstrated that, after superantigen administration in vivo, CD8(+) T cells emerge that preferentially lyse and regulate activated autologous CD4(+) T cells in a T cell receptor (TCR) Vbeta-specific manner. This TCR Vbeta-specific regulation is not observed in beta2-microglobulin-deficient mice and is inhibited, in vitro, by antibody to Qa-1. We now show that similar Vbeta8-specific Qa-1-restricted CD8(+) T cells are also induced by TCV with activated CD4(+) Vbeta8(+) T cells. These CD8(+) T cells specifically lyse murine or human transfectants coexpressing Qa-1 and murine TCR Vbeta8. Further, CD8(+) T cell hybridoma clones generated from B10.PL mice vaccinated with a myelin basic protein-specific CD4(+)Vbeta8(+) T cell clone specifically recognize other CD4(+) T cells and T cell tumors that express Vbeta8 and the syngeneic Qa-1(a) but not the allogeneic Qa-1(b) molecule. Thus, Vbeta-specific Qa-1-restricted CD8(+) T cells are induced by activated CD4(+) T cells. We suggest that these CD8(+) T cells may function to specifically regulate activated CD4(+) T cells during immune responses.

CD8+ T cells control immune responses, and recent studies suggest that this regulation is, in part, specifically directed towards TCR structures expressed by CD4+ cells. To develop a system to study the role of the TCR in regulatory interactions, we isolated clones of CD4+ cells expressing identified TCR V beta chains. These CD4+ clones were used to stimulate and expand autologous CD8+ cells, which kill the inducing CD4+ clone as well as independently isolated autologous CD4+ clones sharing the same TCR V beta as the inducing cell but not CD4+ T cells expressing different V beta TCRs. This V beta-specific cytotoxicity is dependent on the state of activation of the target cells and is not inhibited by an anti-class I monoclonal antibody, W6/32. We envision that V beta-specific CD8+ T cells of this type may regulate immune responses by direct interaction with antigen-activated CD4+ cells.

Interactions mediated by TCRs expressed on different T cell subsets may play a role in immunoregulation. To investigate this idea, we studied the regulation of superantigen-induced TCR V beta-restricted responses. We asked whether the in vivo regulation of CD4+ V beta 8+ T cells following SEB injection is controlled by CD8+ T cells. We found that in mice deficient in CD8+ T cells, the down-regulation of CD4+ V beta 8+ T cells below baseline is not observed. Moreover, following SEB administration, CD8+ T cells emerge that preferentially kill subpopulations of activated CD4+ V beta 8+ but not CD4+ V beta 8- T cells in vitro. This TCR V beta-specific cytotoxicity is dependent on beta 2-microglobulin and is inhibited by antisera specific for Qa-1 but not by antibody to MHC class Ia. These data suggest the idea that the specificity of immune regulation may involve CD8+ T cell recognition of TCR V beta determinants and Qa-1 molecules expressed on CD4+ T cells.

We have investigated the ability of APC Class II molecules to bind and release exogenous peptides, two phenomena that are still poorly understood. In order to investigate the half-life of the complex of an exogenous peptide with DR molecules we have evaluated the uptake and release of the radiolabeled peptide 17-29-Tyr of influenza virus matrix protein (MA 17-29-Y) by a B-EBV cell line at different times and under different conditions. We have found that the kinetics of both binding and release of the peptide are very fast in living cells; using glutaraldehyde-fixed cells, the kinetics of the two phenomena are slow, closely resembling those observed with the same peptide and purified, immobilized DR molecules. As confirmed by the study of a specific T-cell clone activation, the Class II-MA 17-29-Y complexes are short-living ones, with an average half-life of 55 min, and the DR molecules that bind exogenous peptides continuously undergo peptidic exchange. These data, taken together, suggest that the APC are endowed with cellular mechanisms that increase the efficiency of both the loading and the unloading of Class II HLA with exogenous peptides. These mechanisms do not appear to require ATP or to involve newly synthesized Class II molecules, intracellular acidic compartments, or the microtubule-microfilament system. On the other hand, an undamaged cell membrane appears to be crucial for an efficient binding.

Suppression by T cells and T cell anergy have been implied, at different periods of immunological research, as the main agents of peripheral down regulation of the immune response. This article discusses the possibility that anergic T cells, with the participation of appropriate co-stimulatory molecules on their membranes, stimulate CD8 cells with an alpha/beta TCR specific for peptides of the TCR of the anergic cell itself processed and presented by class I MHC. The non-anergic (orthoergic) members of the same clone, if activated, process and present their TCR in the same way, but, lacking the co-stimulatory molecule, are unable to stimulate the anti-idiotype CD8 cells. On the other hand the orthoergic, but not the anergic, cells can be induced into death (possibly by apoptosis) by the specific CD8 lymphocytes or, alternatively, can be pushed into the anergic pool by the same CD8 suppressors, thus contributing to the generation of a TCR-restricted circuit in which suppression is dominant. This simple immunosuppressive circuit can adequately explain some recent experiments on the course of experimental allergic encephalomyelitis. It is to be stressed that many elements of the proposal are hypothetical. They are, however, open to experimental study.

The course of experimental allergic encephalomyelitis (EAE), an animal model for multiple sclerosis, is affected by immunoregulatory T lymphocytes. When animals are immunized with encephalitogenic peptide of myelin basic protein and recover from the first episode of EAE, they become resistant to a second induction of this disease. Animals depleted of CD8+ T cells by antibody-mediated clearance were used to examine the role of CD8+ T cells in EAE. These cells were found to be major participants in the resistance to a second induction of EAE but were not essential for spontaneous recovery from the first episode of the disease.

Some seropositive (RF+) and seronegative (RF-) rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients selectively express high concentrations of the major RF cross-reactive idiotype (RCRI) in their sera and generate high frequencies of RCRI+ pokeweed mitogen (PWM)-induced plasma cells from their peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBM). To determine if normal individuals can express RCRI in vitro, B cells from controls were activated with Staphylococcus aureus Cowan strain I (SAC) bacteria to identify RCRI and RF production. In addition, we studied the relationship of RCRI expression with the subset of B cells bearing CD5. Control CD5+ B cells are responsible for RCRI expression following SAC activation. We also observed that RCRI is dominantly expressed by control SAC-induced B cells in frequencies comparable to that expressed by some RA and juvenile rheumatoid arthritis patients' PBM activated by PWM. Therefore, the frequency of RCRI+ B cells in control and arthritis patients' PBL may be similar, or the selection and/or regulation of RCRI+ B-cell expression in vitro and in vivo may be different in arthritis patients compared to normal individuals.

We investigated the expression of the T cell receptor (TCR)/CD3 complex on a CD4-positive human T cell lymphoma cell line treated with phorbol myristate acetate (PMA) and/or CA2+ ionophore using fluorescence flow cytometry and fluorescence microscopic analysis. PMA induced a significant decrease in the expression of the CD3 complex on the cell membranes. Fluorescence microscopy confirmed that the down regulation is due to internalization of the antigens. Ca2+ ionophore treatment had no effect on the internalization of the CD3 complex. Double staining revealed that the vesicles containing the internalized CD3 complex and those containing intra-cytoplasmic class I major histocompatibility complex antigen had similar distribution in the PMA-stimulated cells, implying coexistence of these two antigens in a cytoplasmic perinuclear distribution.