Search

Your search keyword '"Oliveira, Catia"' showing total 114 results
Start Over Author "Oliveira, Catia"
114 results on '"Oliveira, Catia"'

103. Avaliabilidade do Programa de Valorização do Profissional da Atenção Básica (PRO VAB): desafios para gestão do trabalho.

Author

Oliveira, Catia Martins, da Cruz, Marly Marques, Kanso, Solange, Reis, Ana Cristina, Lima, Antônio, Cardoso Torres, Raquel Maria, Gonçalves, Aline Leal, de Carvalho, Silvia Cristina, and Grabois, Victor

Abstract

Copyright of Revista Ciência & Saúde Coletiva is the property of Associacao Brasileira de Pos-Graduacao em Saude Coletiva and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Published
2015
Full Text
View/download PDF

104. Desafios para a rede nacional de laboratórios de vigilância sanitária: o caso dos medicamentos manipulados.

Author

da Silva, Ana Célia Pessoa, dos Santos Oliveira, Catia Veronica, Cavalheiro, Maria Virginia Silva, and do Carmo de Castro Miranda, Maria

Subjects
PUBLIC health surveillance, HEALTH facilities, MEDICAL screening, LABORATORIES, WORK environment, TECHNOLOGICAL complexity
Abstract

Copyright of Revista Ciência & Saúde Coletiva is the property of Associacao Brasileira de Pos-Graduacao em Saude Coletiva and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Published
2010
Full Text
View/download PDF

105. A community-sourced glossary of open scholarship terms

Author

Parsons, Sam, Azevedo, Flávio, Elsherif, Mahmoud M, Guay, Samuel, Shahim, Owen N, Govaart, Gisela H, Norris, Emma, O'Mahony, Aoife, Parker, Adam J, Todorovic, Ana, Pennington, Charlotte R, Garcia-Pelegrin, Elias, Lazić, Aleksandra, Robertson, Olly, Middleton, Sara L, Valentini, Beatrice, McCuaig, Joanne, Baker, Bradley J, Collins, Elizabeth, Fillon, Adrien A, Lonsdorf, Tina B, Lim, Michele C, Vanek, Norbert, Kovacs, Marton, Roettger, Timo B, Rishi, Sonia, Miranda, Jacob F, Jaquiery, Matt, Stewart, Suzanne L K, Agostini, Valeria, Stewart, Andrew J, Izydorczak, Kamil, Ashcroft-Jones, Sarah, Hartmann, Helena, Ingham, Madeleine, Yamada, Yuki, Vasilev, Martin R, Dechterenko, Filip, Albayrak-Aydemir, Nihan, Yang, Yu-Fang, LaPlume, Annalise A, Wolska, Julia K, Henderson, Emma L, Zaneva, Mirela, Farrar, Benjamin G, Mounce, Ross, Kalandadze, Tamara, Li, Wanyin, Xiao, Qinyu, Ross, Robert M, Yeung, Siu Kit, Liu, Meng, Vandegrift, Micah L, Kekecs, Zoltan, Topor, Marta K, Baum, Myriam A, Williams, Emily A, Assaneea, Asma A, Bret, Amélie, Cashin, Aidan G, Ballou, Nick, Dumbalska, Tsvetomira, Kern, Bettina M J, Melia, Claire R, Arendt, Beatrix, Vineyard, Gerald H, Pickering, Jade S, Evans, Thomas R, Laverty, Catherine, Woodward, Eliza A, Moreau, David, Roche, Dominique G, Rinke, Eike M, Reid, Graham, Garcia-Garzon, Eduardo, Verheyen, Steven, Kocalar, Halil E, Blake, Ashley R, Cockcroft, Jamie P, Micheli, Leticia, Bret, Brice Beffara, Flack, Zoe M, Szaszi, Barnabas, Weinmann, Markus, Lecuona, Oscar, Schmidt, Birgit, Ngiam, William X, Mendes, Ana Barbosa, Francis, Shannon, Gall, Brett J, Paul, Mariella, Keating, Connor T, Grose-Hodge, Magdalena, Bartlett, James E, Iley, Bethan J, Spitzer, Lisa, Pownall, Madeleine, Graham, Christopher J, Wingen, Tobias, Terry, Jenny, Oliveira, Catia Margarida F, Millager, Ryan A, Fox, Kerry J, AlDoh, Alaa, Hart, Alexander, van den Akker, Olmo R, Feldman, Gilad, Kiersz, Dominik A, Pomareda, Christina, Krautter, Kai, Al-Hoorie, Ali H, Aczel, Balazs, Parsons, Sam, Azevedo, Flávio, Elsherif, Mahmoud M, Guay, Samuel, Shahim, Owen N, Govaart, Gisela H, Norris, Emma, O'Mahony, Aoife, Parker, Adam J, Todorovic, Ana, Pennington, Charlotte R, Garcia-Pelegrin, Elias, Lazić, Aleksandra, Robertson, Olly, Middleton, Sara L, Valentini, Beatrice, McCuaig, Joanne, Baker, Bradley J, Collins, Elizabeth, Fillon, Adrien A, Lonsdorf, Tina B, Lim, Michele C, Vanek, Norbert, Kovacs, Marton, Roettger, Timo B, Rishi, Sonia, Miranda, Jacob F, Jaquiery, Matt, Stewart, Suzanne L K, Agostini, Valeria, Stewart, Andrew J, Izydorczak, Kamil, Ashcroft-Jones, Sarah, Hartmann, Helena, Ingham, Madeleine, Yamada, Yuki, Vasilev, Martin R, Dechterenko, Filip, Albayrak-Aydemir, Nihan, Yang, Yu-Fang, LaPlume, Annalise A, Wolska, Julia K, Henderson, Emma L, Zaneva, Mirela, Farrar, Benjamin G, Mounce, Ross, Kalandadze, Tamara, Li, Wanyin, Xiao, Qinyu, Ross, Robert M, Yeung, Siu Kit, Liu, Meng, Vandegrift, Micah L, Kekecs, Zoltan, Topor, Marta K, Baum, Myriam A, Williams, Emily A, Assaneea, Asma A, Bret, Amélie, Cashin, Aidan G, Ballou, Nick, Dumbalska, Tsvetomira, Kern, Bettina M J, Melia, Claire R, Arendt, Beatrix, Vineyard, Gerald H, Pickering, Jade S, Evans, Thomas R, Laverty, Catherine, Woodward, Eliza A, Moreau, David, Roche, Dominique G, Rinke, Eike M, Reid, Graham, Garcia-Garzon, Eduardo, Verheyen, Steven, Kocalar, Halil E, Blake, Ashley R, Cockcroft, Jamie P, Micheli, Leticia, Bret, Brice Beffara, Flack, Zoe M, Szaszi, Barnabas, Weinmann, Markus, Lecuona, Oscar, Schmidt, Birgit, Ngiam, William X, Mendes, Ana Barbosa, Francis, Shannon, Gall, Brett J, Paul, Mariella, Keating, Connor T, Grose-Hodge, Magdalena, Bartlett, James E, Iley, Bethan J, Spitzer, Lisa, Pownall, Madeleine, Graham, Christopher J, Wingen, Tobias, Terry, Jenny, Oliveira, Catia Margarida F, Millager, Ryan A, Fox, Kerry J, AlDoh, Alaa, Hart, Alexander, van den Akker, Olmo R, Feldman, Gilad, Kiersz, Dominik A, Pomareda, Christina, Krautter, Kai, Al-Hoorie, Ali H, and Aczel, Balazs

Abstract

Open scholarship has transformed research, and introduced a host of new terms in the lexicon of researchers. The ‘Framework for Open and Reproducible Research Teaching’ (FORRT) community presents a crowdsourced glossary of open scholarship terms to facilitate education and effective communication between experts and newcomers.

106. The replication crisis has led to positive structural, procedural, and community changes

Author

Korbmacher, Max, Azevedo, Flavio, Pennington, Charlotte R., Hartmann, Helena, Pownall, Madeleine, Schmidt, Kathleen, Elsherif, Mahmoud, Breznau, Nate, Robertson, Olly, Kalandadze, Tamara, Yu, Shijun, Baker, Bradley J., O’Mahony, Aoife, Olsnes, Jørgen Ø. -S., Shaw, John J., Gjoneska, Biljana, Yamada, Yuki, Röer, Jan P., Murphy, Jennifer, Alzahawi, Shilaan, Grinschgl, Sandra, Oliveira, Catia M., Wingen, Tobias, Yeung, Siu Kit, Liu, Meng, König, Laura M., Albayrak-Aydemir, Nihan, Lecuona, Oscar, Micheli, Leticia, Evans, Thomas, Korbmacher, Max, Azevedo, Flavio, Pennington, Charlotte R., Hartmann, Helena, Pownall, Madeleine, Schmidt, Kathleen, Elsherif, Mahmoud, Breznau, Nate, Robertson, Olly, Kalandadze, Tamara, Yu, Shijun, Baker, Bradley J., O’Mahony, Aoife, Olsnes, Jørgen Ø. -S., Shaw, John J., Gjoneska, Biljana, Yamada, Yuki, Röer, Jan P., Murphy, Jennifer, Alzahawi, Shilaan, Grinschgl, Sandra, Oliveira, Catia M., Wingen, Tobias, Yeung, Siu Kit, Liu, Meng, König, Laura M., Albayrak-Aydemir, Nihan, Lecuona, Oscar, Micheli, Leticia, and Evans, Thomas

Abstract

The emergence of large-scale replication projects yielding successful rates substantially lower than expected caused the behavioural, cognitive, and social sciences to experience a so-called ‘replication crisis’. In this Perspective, we reframe this ‘crisis’ through the lens of a credibility revolution, focusing on positive structural, procedural and community-driven changes. Second, we outline a path to expand ongoing advances and improvements. The credibility revolution has been an impetus to several substantive changes which will have a positive, long-term impact on our research environment.

107. Teaching open and reproducible scholarship: a critical review of the evidence base for current pedagogical methods and their outcomes

Author

Pownall, Madeleine, Azevedo, Flávio, König, Laura M., Slack, Hannah R., Evans, Thomas Rhys, Flack, Zoe, Grinschgl, Sandra, Elsherif, Mahmoud M., Gilligan-Lee, Katie A., de Oliveira, Catia M. F., Gjoneska, Biljana, Kalandadze, Tamara, Button, Katherine, Ashcroft-Jones, Sarah, Terry, Jenny, Albayrak-Aydemir, Nihan, Děchtěrenko, Filip, Alzahawi, Shilaan, Baker, Bradley J., Pittelkow, Merle-Marie, Riedl, Lydia, Schmidt, Kathleen, Pennington, Charlotte R., Shaw, John J., Lüke, Timo, Makel, Matthew C., Hartmann, Helena, Zaneva, Mirela, Walker, Daniel, Verheyen, Steven, Cox, Daniel, Mattschey, Jennifer, Gallagher-Mitchell, Tom, Branney, Peter, Weisberg, Yanna, Izydorczak, Kamil, Al-Hoorie, Ali H., Creaven, Ann-Marie, Stewart, Suzanne L. K., Krautter, Kai, Matvienko-Sikar, Karen, Westwood, Samuel J., Arriaga, Patrícia, Liu, Meng, Baum, Myriam A., Wingen, Tobias, Ross, Robert M., O'Mahony, Aoife, Bochynska, Agata, Jamieson, Michelle, Tromp, Myrthe Vel, Yeung, Siu Kit, Vasilev, Martin R., Gourdon-Kanhukamwe, Amélie, Micheli, Leticia, Konkol, Markus, Moreau, David, Bartlett, James E., Clark, Kait, Brekelmans, Gwen, Gkinopoulos, Theofilos, Tyler, Samantha L., Röer, Jan Philipp, Ilchovska, Zlatomira G., Madan, Christopher R., Robertson, Olly, Iley, Bethan J., Guay, Samuel, Sladekova, Martina, Sadhwani, Shanu, Pownall, Madeleine, Azevedo, Flávio, König, Laura M., Slack, Hannah R., Evans, Thomas Rhys, Flack, Zoe, Grinschgl, Sandra, Elsherif, Mahmoud M., Gilligan-Lee, Katie A., de Oliveira, Catia M. F., Gjoneska, Biljana, Kalandadze, Tamara, Button, Katherine, Ashcroft-Jones, Sarah, Terry, Jenny, Albayrak-Aydemir, Nihan, Děchtěrenko, Filip, Alzahawi, Shilaan, Baker, Bradley J., Pittelkow, Merle-Marie, Riedl, Lydia, Schmidt, Kathleen, Pennington, Charlotte R., Shaw, John J., Lüke, Timo, Makel, Matthew C., Hartmann, Helena, Zaneva, Mirela, Walker, Daniel, Verheyen, Steven, Cox, Daniel, Mattschey, Jennifer, Gallagher-Mitchell, Tom, Branney, Peter, Weisberg, Yanna, Izydorczak, Kamil, Al-Hoorie, Ali H., Creaven, Ann-Marie, Stewart, Suzanne L. K., Krautter, Kai, Matvienko-Sikar, Karen, Westwood, Samuel J., Arriaga, Patrícia, Liu, Meng, Baum, Myriam A., Wingen, Tobias, Ross, Robert M., O'Mahony, Aoife, Bochynska, Agata, Jamieson, Michelle, Tromp, Myrthe Vel, Yeung, Siu Kit, Vasilev, Martin R., Gourdon-Kanhukamwe, Amélie, Micheli, Leticia, Konkol, Markus, Moreau, David, Bartlett, James E., Clark, Kait, Brekelmans, Gwen, Gkinopoulos, Theofilos, Tyler, Samantha L., Röer, Jan Philipp, Ilchovska, Zlatomira G., Madan, Christopher R., Robertson, Olly, Iley, Bethan J., Guay, Samuel, Sladekova, Martina, and Sadhwani, Shanu

Abstract

In recent years, the scientific community has called for improvements in the credibility, robustness and reproducibility of research, characterized by increased interest and promotion of open and transparent research practices. While progress has been positive, there is a lack of consideration about how this approach can be embedded into undergraduate and postgraduate research training. Specifically, a critical overview of the literature which investigates how integrating open and reproducible science may influence student outcomes is needed. In this paper, we provide the first critical review of literature surrounding the integration of open and reproducible scholarship into teaching and learning and its associated outcomes in students. Our review highlighted how embedding open and reproducible scholarship appears to be associated with (i) students’ scientific literacies (i.e. students’ understanding of open research, consumption of science and the development of transferable skills); (ii) student engagement (i.e. motivation and engagement with learning, collaboration and engagement in open research) and (iii) students’ attitudes towards science (i.e. trust in science and confidence in research findings). However, our review also identified a need for more robust and rigorous methods within pedagogical research, including more interventional and experimental evaluations of teaching practice. We discuss implications for teaching and learning scholarship.

108. A community-sourced glossary of open scholarship terms

Author

Parsons, Sam, Azevedo, Flávio, Elsherif, Mahmoud M, Guay, Samuel, Shahim, Owen N, Govaart, Gisela H, Norris, Emma, O'Mahony, Aoife, Parker, Adam J, Todorovic, Ana, Pennington, Charlotte R, Garcia-Pelegrin, Elias, Lazić, Aleksandra, Robertson, Olly, Middleton, Sara L, Valentini, Beatrice, McCuaig, Joanne, Baker, Bradley J, Collins, Elizabeth, Fillon, Adrien A, Lonsdorf, Tina B, Lim, Michele C, Vanek, Norbert, Kovacs, Marton, Roettger, Timo B, Rishi, Sonia, Miranda, Jacob F, Jaquiery, Matt, Stewart, Suzanne L K, Agostini, Valeria, Stewart, Andrew J, Izydorczak, Kamil, Ashcroft-Jones, Sarah, Hartmann, Helena, Ingham, Madeleine, Yamada, Yuki, Vasilev, Martin R, Dechterenko, Filip, Albayrak-Aydemir, Nihan, Yang, Yu-Fang, LaPlume, Annalise A, Wolska, Julia K, Henderson, Emma L, Zaneva, Mirela, Farrar, Benjamin G, Mounce, Ross, Kalandadze, Tamara, Li, Wanyin, Xiao, Qinyu, Ross, Robert M, Yeung, Siu Kit, Liu, Meng, Vandegrift, Micah L, Kekecs, Zoltan, Topor, Marta K, Baum, Myriam A, Williams, Emily A, Assaneea, Asma A, Bret, Amélie, Cashin, Aidan G, Ballou, Nick, Dumbalska, Tsvetomira, Kern, Bettina M J, Melia, Claire R, Arendt, Beatrix, Vineyard, Gerald H, Pickering, Jade S, Evans, Thomas R, Laverty, Catherine, Woodward, Eliza A, Moreau, David, Roche, Dominique G, Rinke, Eike M, Reid, Graham, Garcia-Garzon, Eduardo, Verheyen, Steven, Kocalar, Halil E, Blake, Ashley R, Cockcroft, Jamie P, Micheli, Leticia, Bret, Brice Beffara, Flack, Zoe M, Szaszi, Barnabas, Weinmann, Markus, Lecuona, Oscar, Schmidt, Birgit, Ngiam, William X, Mendes, Ana Barbosa, Francis, Shannon, Gall, Brett J, Paul, Mariella, Keating, Connor T, Grose-Hodge, Magdalena, Bartlett, James E, Iley, Bethan J, Spitzer, Lisa, Pownall, Madeleine, Graham, Christopher J, Wingen, Tobias, Terry, Jenny, Oliveira, Catia Margarida F, Millager, Ryan A, Fox, Kerry J, AlDoh, Alaa, Hart, Alexander, van den Akker, Olmo R, Feldman, Gilad, Kiersz, Dominik A, Pomareda, Christina, Krautter, Kai, Al-Hoorie, Ali H, Aczel, Balazs, Parsons, Sam, Azevedo, Flávio, Elsherif, Mahmoud M, Guay, Samuel, Shahim, Owen N, Govaart, Gisela H, Norris, Emma, O'Mahony, Aoife, Parker, Adam J, Todorovic, Ana, Pennington, Charlotte R, Garcia-Pelegrin, Elias, Lazić, Aleksandra, Robertson, Olly, Middleton, Sara L, Valentini, Beatrice, McCuaig, Joanne, Baker, Bradley J, Collins, Elizabeth, Fillon, Adrien A, Lonsdorf, Tina B, Lim, Michele C, Vanek, Norbert, Kovacs, Marton, Roettger, Timo B, Rishi, Sonia, Miranda, Jacob F, Jaquiery, Matt, Stewart, Suzanne L K, Agostini, Valeria, Stewart, Andrew J, Izydorczak, Kamil, Ashcroft-Jones, Sarah, Hartmann, Helena, Ingham, Madeleine, Yamada, Yuki, Vasilev, Martin R, Dechterenko, Filip, Albayrak-Aydemir, Nihan, Yang, Yu-Fang, LaPlume, Annalise A, Wolska, Julia K, Henderson, Emma L, Zaneva, Mirela, Farrar, Benjamin G, Mounce, Ross, Kalandadze, Tamara, Li, Wanyin, Xiao, Qinyu, Ross, Robert M, Yeung, Siu Kit, Liu, Meng, Vandegrift, Micah L, Kekecs, Zoltan, Topor, Marta K, Baum, Myriam A, Williams, Emily A, Assaneea, Asma A, Bret, Amélie, Cashin, Aidan G, Ballou, Nick, Dumbalska, Tsvetomira, Kern, Bettina M J, Melia, Claire R, Arendt, Beatrix, Vineyard, Gerald H, Pickering, Jade S, Evans, Thomas R, Laverty, Catherine, Woodward, Eliza A, Moreau, David, Roche, Dominique G, Rinke, Eike M, Reid, Graham, Garcia-Garzon, Eduardo, Verheyen, Steven, Kocalar, Halil E, Blake, Ashley R, Cockcroft, Jamie P, Micheli, Leticia, Bret, Brice Beffara, Flack, Zoe M, Szaszi, Barnabas, Weinmann, Markus, Lecuona, Oscar, Schmidt, Birgit, Ngiam, William X, Mendes, Ana Barbosa, Francis, Shannon, Gall, Brett J, Paul, Mariella, Keating, Connor T, Grose-Hodge, Magdalena, Bartlett, James E, Iley, Bethan J, Spitzer, Lisa, Pownall, Madeleine, Graham, Christopher J, Wingen, Tobias, Terry, Jenny, Oliveira, Catia Margarida F, Millager, Ryan A, Fox, Kerry J, AlDoh, Alaa, Hart, Alexander, van den Akker, Olmo R, Feldman, Gilad, Kiersz, Dominik A, Pomareda, Christina, Krautter, Kai, Al-Hoorie, Ali H, and Aczel, Balazs

Abstract

Open scholarship has transformed research, and introduced a host of new terms in the lexicon of researchers. The ‘Framework for Open and Reproducible Research Teaching’ (FORRT) community presents a crowdsourced glossary of open scholarship terms to facilitate education and effective communication between experts and newcomers.

109. Health policy and regulatory authorities: challenges of technology regulation in Public Health Emergencies.

Author

Oliveira CVDS and Pepe VLE

Subjects
Brazil, Humans, Biomedical Technology legislation & jurisprudence, World Health Organization, International Cooperation, Delivery of Health Care organization & administration, Delivery of Health Care legislation & jurisprudence, Health Policy, Public Health, Emergencies
Abstract

Public Health Emergencies (PHE) have had repercussions on health systems on a global scale, and timely access to new health technologies is a challenge for health policy. The national regulatory authorities (NRA) play a key role in the evaluation and regulation of these technologies. The present study aims to analyze the main strategies and regulatory instruments used to deal with the challenges of regulating new technologies necessary for the health system's effective response during a PHE. This research, based on WHO and Brazilian NRA norms and documents, considered dimensions related to strategies for strengthening regulatory activities and regulatory instruments used to accelerate access to technologies, especially during PHEs. International cooperation between the NRA and the WHO were important strategies for strengthening the NRA, with emphasis on the use of reliance, regionalization, accelerated assessments, and work/information sharing, as well as the processes of regulatory harmonization and convergence. In addition to the use of existing regulatory instruments, efforts were also identified in order to implement new ones.

Published
2024
Full Text
View/download PDF

110. Teaching open and reproducible scholarship: a critical review of the evidence base for current pedagogical methods and their outcomes.

Author

Pownall M, Azevedo F, König LM, Slack HR, Evans TR, Flack Z, Grinschgl S, Elsherif MM, Gilligan-Lee KA, de Oliveira CMF, Gjoneska B, Kalandadze T, Button K, Ashcroft-Jones S, Terry J, Albayrak-Aydemir N, Děchtěrenko F, Alzahawi S, Baker BJ, Pittelkow MM, Riedl L, Schmidt K, Pennington CR, Shaw JJ, Lüke T, Makel MC, Hartmann H, Zaneva M, Walker D, Verheyen S, Cox D, Mattschey J, Gallagher-Mitchell T, Branney P, Weisberg Y, Izydorczak K, Al-Hoorie AH, Creaven AM, Stewart SLK, Krautter K, Matvienko-Sikar K, Westwood SJ, Arriaga P, Liu M, Baum MA, Wingen T, Ross RM, O'Mahony A, Bochynska A, Jamieson M, Tromp MV, Yeung SK, Vasilev MR, Gourdon-Kanhukamwe A, Micheli L, Konkol M, Moreau D, Bartlett JE, Clark K, Brekelmans G, Gkinopoulos T, Tyler SL, Röer JP, Ilchovska ZG, Madan CR, Robertson O, Iley BJ, Guay S, Sladekova M, and Sadhwani S

Abstract

In recent years, the scientific community has called for improvements in the credibility, robustness and reproducibility of research, characterized by increased interest and promotion of open and transparent research practices. While progress has been positive, there is a lack of consideration about how this approach can be embedded into undergraduate and postgraduate research training. Specifically, a critical overview of the literature which investigates how integrating open and reproducible science may influence student outcomes is needed. In this paper, we provide the first critical review of literature surrounding the integration of open and reproducible scholarship into teaching and learning and its associated outcomes in students. Our review highlighted how embedding open and reproducible scholarship appears to be associated with (i) students' scientific literacies (i.e. students' understanding of open research, consumption of science and the development of transferable skills); (ii) student engagement (i.e. motivation and engagement with learning, collaboration and engagement in open research) and (iii) students' attitudes towards science (i.e. trust in science and confidence in research findings). However, our review also identified a need for more robust and rigorous methods within pedagogical research, including more interventional and experimental evaluations of teaching practice. We discuss implications for teaching and learning scholarship., Competing Interests: We declare we have no competing interests., (© 2023 The Authors.)

Published
2023
Full Text
View/download PDF

111. [Performance of the mobile emergency care service from the perspective of managers and professionals: case study in a region of the state of São Paulo, Brazil].

Author

Oliveira CCM, O'Dwyer G, and Novaes HMD

Subjects
Brazil, Health Policy, Humans, Qualitative Research, Ambulances, Emergency Medical Services
Abstract

This article aims to analyze the perspective of managers and professionals about the performance of the Mobile Emergency Care Service (SAMU) in the Grande ABC region. This is a qualitative case study based on the formulation of a theoretical-logical model of intervention and semi-structured interviews. The Theoretical-Logical Model translated the dimensions of SAMU analysis: regulation, care and management. The regulation process was understood as a strategic space where the judgment of the patient's need and the ambulance dispatch time have the potential to influence the outcomes of the cases transported. In health care, the main themes that emerged were investment in the qualification of the team and in telemedicine with the perspective of improving the quality of care and making the diagnosis more accurate. In management, challenges such as integrating SAMU with tertiary centers, improving the information system, and monitoring and evaluation were highlighted aiming to qualify the regulatory processes by aligning them with the objectives proposed in the health policy. The set of data analyzed reinforces the capacity of the SAMU in emergency care in the region; however, the intervention needs to overcome important challenges in order to improve the prognosis of the cases transported.

Published
2022
Full Text
View/download PDF

112. Health protection in Brazil: the National Sanitary Surveillance System.

Author

Seta MH, Oliveira CVDS, and Pepe VLE

Subjects
Brazil, Delivery of Health Care economics, Environmental Monitoring methods, Financing, Government, Humans, National Health Programs organization & administration, Delivery of Health Care organization & administration, Population Surveillance methods, Public Health Surveillance methods
Abstract

This essay presents the singular arrangement named Health Surveillance in Brazil and the specificities of its components: public Health Surveillance, Worker's Surveillance, Environmental Surveillance, Sanitary Surveillance, as well as the constitutional determination to carry out the actions of sanitary and epidemiological surveillance and Worker's Surveillance. The two national systems of protection and promote health are also presented - National Public Health Surveillance System and National Sanitary Surveillance System, with an emphasis on the regulatory issues in health made by the latter and some constraints to its action by the Legislative Branch. It reaffirms the Brazilian State's constitutional duty to protect health, and to provide the means for adequate functioning of the two systems, bearing in mind that defense of the public interest in health products and services means confronting oligopolies of transnational economic interests. This paper states the opinion that the financial constraints facing the Brazilian State from time to time cannot be allowed to prevail over the rights of citizenship, independently of the public underfunding of health in Brazil.

Published
2017
Full Text
View/download PDF

113. [The scientific production and research groups on sanitary surveillance at CNPq].

Author

Pepe VL, de Noronha AB, Figueiredo TA, de Souza Ade A, Oliveira CV, and Pontes Júnior DM

Subjects
Brazil, Publishing statistics & numerical data, Population Surveillance, Research statistics & numerical data
Abstract

Sanitary surveillance is an intersectorial and multidisciplinary practice of health regulation. The aim was to describe the scientific research on sanitary surveillance and its research groups in Brazil during the period of 1997 to 2003, through the Census of 2000, 2002 and 2004 of Directory of Research Groups of the Scientific and Technological Development National Council (CNPq). The term "sanitary surveillance" was used to search the production and the research groups in the Lattes Platform of CNPq. There were 1,194 items, 913 in bibliographic production and 281 in post-graduated production, with an increment of 540% on the period. There were 735 research groups, created mostly from 2000 to 2003 and 6,263 researchers concentrated in the Southeast Region and in CNPq sub area of Public Health. The great increase of the production lead to the conclusion that sanitary surveillance have been a locus of production only in the last decade, presented in scientific events of Public Health and until now concentrated just like others areas in Health.

Published
2010
Full Text
View/download PDF

114. [Challenges to the national network of sanitary surveillance laboratories: the case of manipulated drugs].

Author

da Silva AC, Oliveira CV, Cavalheiro MV, and Miranda Mdo C

Subjects
Brazil, Product Surveillance, Postmarketing standards, Drug Industry standards, Laboratories standards
Abstract

From the research on the "Status of Pharmacy Formulated Medicines (PFM) in health surveillance laboratories (HSL)" as result of an agreement between Ensp and Anvisa, we present and question issues that may contribute for reflections about the National Network of HSL organization in confronting analytical demands, having PFMs as discussion organizers. The Public Laboratories (PL) that evaluated PFMs from 2000 to 2005 were identified; its analysts and samples were scanned, and three laboratories were selected to be visited. Sample processing was analyzed from its entry till the final report's issuance. Samples study allowed identifying: applicants and sample's documents; HSL executors and how they receive, process and reply the analysis requests demands. Applicants are judiciary (20%) and the health surveillance (HS) (74%). Baseless claims represent 25%. Seven HSL analyzed PFMs. 45% of the samples previously passed by 15 PL; HR were insufficient to meet the claims' analytical complexity; little institutional culture in dealing with samples of PFM and HS; 31% of samples have no conclusion; 40% of the satisfactory reports and 23% of the unsatisfactory have not conducted adequate tests to answer the demand's reasons. In conclusion, HSLs must evaluate their working process.

Published
2010
Full Text
View/download PDF

Catalog

Books, media, physical & digital resources
See catalog results