Search

A national center for health professions education research is proposed to facilitate well-funded, peer-reviewed, academically credible research. Its goals would allow for testing of models to provide health professionals with education grounded in sound methodology and content. (Author/MSE)

PhenomenonMedical learners are more likely than practicing physicians to experience negative emotions toward some patients whom they find challenging, and medical students experience such emotions related to their identity as learners. Little is known about experiences of residents, who are further along in their physician identity formation and have greater autonomy and competence. We explored and characterized how residents understand their experiences of the phenomenon of feeling negative emotions toward patients in relation to their identities as residents. Approach: In 2018, 305 final-year obstetrics and gynecology residents were invited to participate in interviews, which we conducted until reaching theoretical sufficiency. In semi-structured interviews conducted by phone, we probed interactions when residents felt negative emotions toward patients, including reasons for their feelings related to their professional identities, strategies, and curricular desires. The authors coded data and identified patterns using thematic analysis. Findings: Nineteen residents were interviewed by phone. Residents experienced negative emotions toward patients because of challenges to their identities as: physicians – wanting respect and specific unexpected patient behaviors; learners – desiring complete autonomy and experiencing challenges with attending physicians; teachers – wanting to be a role model and protect junior learners; and workers – trying to complete tasks. Among the strategies used to manage feelings toward patients, they struggled with "venting", or complaining about patients, which was not always helpful and residents recognized as perceived negatively by students. They desired curricular support for these interactions such as debriefs and other supported reflection, faculty modeling, and communication skills training. Insights: Like medical students and physicians in practice, residents experience negative emotions toward patients, often because of and made more difficult by their identities as physicians, learners, teachers, and workers. Educators should support residents' reflections about these interactions, model compassionate behavior when feeling challenged by patients, and address unhealthy coping strategies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A study was conducted to investigate the factors associated with the decision of medical students regarding their career choices regarding internal medicine (IM). Results indicated that most medical students expressed reservations regarding IM as a career option and those who were happy with the IM practice environment, internists lifestyle, etc were more likely to pursue IM as a career.

Abstract Portfolios have been heralded as an assessment method to enhance students' self-directed learning. This pilot study was done to better understand the nature of such issues from the perspective [...]

Objective This study investigated which factors predict the likelihood of densitometry technologists counseling their patients about osteoporosis prevention. Method Predictors of osteoporosis prevention patient education by bone densitometry technologists were analyzed in a sample of 417 radiologic technologists with ARRT advanced certification in bone densitometry and 158 densitometry technologists, none of whom were ARRT certified in bone densitometry. Results The regression model accounted for 41% of the variation in reports of bone health counseling. Densitometry technologists with high internal motivation and low personal barriers reported educating their patients about osteoporosis prevention. Conclusion Recommendations for increasing bone health promotion include increasing personal interest through sensitivity training, expanding delivery by promoting models for clinical implementation and creating educational opportunities to strengthen counseling skills., The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) issued Healthy People 2010 (1) to identify priorities for health improvement for the first decade of this century. Specific objectives recommended [...]

The Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) is widely used by medical, nursing, and allied-health professionals in the management and study of patients with Parkinson disease (PD), who sometimes present [...]

ProblemClerkship grades contribute to a summative assessment culture in clerkships and can therefore interfere with students' learning. For example, by focusing on summative, tiered clerkship grades, students often discount accompanying feedback that could inform future learning. This case report seeks to explore whether an assessment system intervention which eliminated tiered grades and enhanced feedback was associated with changes in student perceptions of clerkship assessment and perceptions of the clinical learning environment. Intervention: In January 2019, our institution eliminated tiered clerkship grading (honors/pass/fail) for medical students during the core clerkship year and implemented pass/fail clerkship grading along with required twice weekly, work-based assessments for formative feedback. Context: In this single institution, cross-sectional survey study, we collected data from fourth-year medical students one year after an assessment system intervention. The intervention entailed changing from honors/pass/fail to pass/fail grading in all eight core clerkships and implementing an electronic system to record twice-weekly real-time formative work-based assessments. The survey queried student perceptions on the fairness and accuracy of grading and the clinical learning environment—including whether clerkships were mastery- or performance-oriented. We compared responses from students one year after the assessment intervention to those from the class one year before the intervention. Comparisons were made using unpaired, two-tailed t-tests or chi-squared tests as appropriate with Cohen's d for effect size estimation for score differences. Content analysis was used to analyze responses from two open-ended questions about feedback and grading. Impact: Survey response rates were similar before and after intervention (76% (127/168) vs. 72% (118/163), respectively) with no between-group differences in demographics. The after-intervention group showed statistically significant increases in the following factors: "grades are transparent and fair" (Cohen's d = 0.80), "students receive useful feedback" (d = 0.51), and "resident evaluation procedures are fair" (d = 0.40). After-intervention respondents perceived the clerkship learning environment to be more mastery-oriented (d = 0.52), less performance approach-oriented (d = 0.63), and less performance avoid-oriented (d = 0.49). There were no statistical differences in the factors "attending evaluation procedures are fair," "evaluations are accurate," "evaluations are biased," or "perception of stereotype threat." Open-ended questions revealed student recommendations to improve clerkship summary narratives, burden of work-based assessment, and in-person feedback. Lessons Learned: After an assessment system change to pass/fail grading with work-based assessments, we observed moderate to large improvements in student perceptions of clerkship grading and the mastery orientation of the learning environment. Our intervention did not improve perceptions around bias in assessment in clerkships. Other medical schools may consider similar interventions to begin to address student concerns with clerkship assessment and promote a more adaptive learning environment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Problem: Although many students begin medical school with some idea of their specialty interest, up to 80% of these students choose a different specialty by their final year. This pivot tends to happen in the clerkship year, when students are immersed in the clinical environment, gaining a practical understanding of the day-to-day work in different fields. Yet, in this year students have limited experiences with specialties. Clinical electives during the clerkship year may aid students in career development. The authors examined student career exploration through the lens of social cognitive career theory (SCCT). SCCT posits three variables that influence career development: personal goals, self-efficacy, and understanding outcome expectations. With this framework, the authors sought to understand how a program of clinical electives during the clerkship year influences students' perceptions of their career exploration. We aimed to: (1) describe an innovative clerkship elective program designed for career exploration, and (2) explore how this influenced students' career exploration using qualitative analysis. Intervention: Beginning in 2018, students at our institution were required to participate in three 2-week clinical electives during their clerkship year, called Clinical Immersive Experiences (CIExes). CIExes were categorized into four different types: apprenticeship, clinical skills building, integrative (multi-disciplinary), or subspecialty. Authors invited fourth year students to participate in interviews (January to March 2019) about how they selected electives and how these electives contributed to their career exploration. Interviews continued until reaching information sufficiency. Authors coded and analyzed transcripts using template analysis. Context: This curricular intervention took place in the context of large-scale curricular redesign. Students began clerkships partway into their second year of medical school. The family and community medicine clerkship, which was previously a 6-week core clerkship, was changed to a longitudinal format, thus freeing up 6 weeks for electives. Other core clerkships included anesthesia (2 weeks), medicine (8 weeks), neurology (4 weeks), obstetrics and gynecology (6 weeks), pediatrics (6 weeks), psychiatry (4 weeks), and surgery (8 weeks). Impact: From 15 student interviews, we identified three major themes. First, CIExes facilitated personalized career exploration. All students felt that at least one elective helped them solidify their decision about a specialty choice. Second, CIExes promoted focused learning and skills development that complemented core rotations. They noted the benefit of positive relationships with supervisors, particularly attendings, during these electives. Third, students highlighted how these electives fostered a positive learning environment and enhanced wellbeing. SCCT clarified how the CIEx program helped students advance their personal goals, self-efficacy, and outcome expectations during a pivotal time in medical school. Lessons Learned: We learned that from the student perspective, the inclusion of clinical electives in the clerkship year benefited students' career exploration by helping them develop and refine their career goals, increase self-efficacy, and test outcome expectations in a meaningful way as anticipated from SCCT. In addition, we found that CIExes created a positive learning environment that allowed deep relationships to develop in fields of interest and that supported a strong sense of wellbeing. Supplemental data for this article is available online at https://doi.org/10.1080/10401334.2021.1891545 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]