101. Up Against the Wall.
- Author
-
Serwer, Andy, Nocera, Joseph, Burke, Doris, Florian, Ellen, and Bonamici, Kate
- Subjects
SECURITIES industry ,MUTUAL funds ,EXECUTIVES ,HEDGING (Finance) ,PORTFOLIO management (Investments) ,INVESTORS ,INVESTMENT analysis ,MOTIVATION (Psychology) ,AMERICAN business enterprises ,CORRUPTION ,ACTIONS & defenses (Law) - Abstract
As the mutual fund scandal erupts into public view, Dick Strong, majority owner of Strong Capital Management Inc., finds himself at its center. Strong and his firm stand accused of unethical, and possibly illegal, activity. What's more, when you start to ask questions about Dick Strong, a pattern emerges of personal and professional behavior that not only is idiosyncratic but pushes the limits of acceptability. In early September 2003, New York attorney general Eliot Spitzer alleged that Strong Capital and three other mutual fund companies had engaged in illicit trades with Canary Capital Partners, a New Jersey hedge fund. Spitzer accused Strong of allowing Canary to quickly jump in and out of its mutual funds to make a quick buck, a practice known as "market timing." Then, on Oct. 30, came a bigger bombshell. Strong's board of directors announced that it had "become aware of active trading of the Strong Funds by employees of Strong Capital Management, including Richard Strong." It was reported that Strong's market timing, which took place over several years, netted him a profit of some $600,000. In addition, FORTUNE has learned that Spitzer's investigators have uncovered evidence suggesting that the compliance officials at Strong were told by other Strong executives to avert their eyes from the boss's market timing. Spitzer's office is now weighing the possibility of filing criminal charges against Strong, sources say. What has driven the 61-year-old is the ambition to build a dominant fund complex. For all that, Strong has largely failed to build the kind of company he dreams about. In many ways his involvement in the current mutual fund scandal is simply the latest example of the flaws that have held back Strong--both the man and the company.
- Published
- 2003