101. Differences in reconstruction of the anatomy with modern adjustable compared to second-generation shoulder prosthesis
- Author
-
Steffen End, Ulrich Irlenbusch, and Mustafa Kilic
- Subjects
medicine.medical_specialty ,medicine.medical_treatment ,Radiography ,Joint Prosthesis ,Prosthesis Design ,Prosthesis ,Osteoarthritis ,medicine ,Humans ,Orthopedics and Sports Medicine ,Rotator cuff ,Arthroplasty, Replacement ,Range of Motion, Articular ,Retrospective Studies ,Original Paper ,business.industry ,Normal anatomy ,Shoulder Joint ,Anatomy ,Plastic Surgery Procedures ,Shoulder Prosthesis ,Arthroplasty ,medicine.anatomical_structure ,Orthopedic surgery ,Humeral Head ,Surgery ,Shoulder joint ,business - Abstract
Reconstruction of the anatomy of the proximal humerus is a prerequisite to achieving good long-term clinical results after shoulder arthroplasty. Modern, adjustable prostheses have greater flexibility of inclination, retroversion, and medial and dorsal offset in comparison with older prostheses. Such improvements should allow for better reconstruction of the centre of rotation compared to older prostheses. Reconstruction of the humeral head centre was assessed in 106 modern adjustable (Affinis) and 47 second-generation prostheses. All reconstructions were compared both to the preoperative state and the unoperated shoulder. To describe the pre- and postoperative states, the geometry and position of the humeral head in relation to the glenoid were analysed on patient radiographs. Applying the defined parameters, modern adjustable prostheses showed better reconstruction than second generation prostheses. Parameter values measured in reconstructions using fourth generation prostheses were comparable to those of the unoperated shoulder, but differed significantly from the preoperative state. Second generation prostheses, in contrast, only show non-specific differences in parameter values. This suggests that an approximate reconstruction of normal anatomy can be achieved using a modern fourth generation prosthesis. Reconstruction of the complex anatomy of the proximal humerus is significantly better with modern adjustable prostheses compared to second generation prostheses. Improved clinical outcome can therefore be predicted in a functional and intact rotator cuff. The advantage of using modern prostheses systems over older models is clearly demonstrated in this study.
- Published
- 2010