101. High Rates of Missed HIV Testing Among Oral PrEP Users in the United States From 2018-2021: A National Assessment on Compliance With HIV Testing Recommendations of the CDC PrEP Guidelines.
- Author
-
Baron J, Tchelidze T, LaBrot B, Yao J, Mayer KH, Kuritzkes D, Robinson N, and Patel RR
- Abstract
Background: The US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommends HIV testing every 3 months in oral PrEP users. We performed a national assessment of HIV testing compliance among oral PrEP users., Methods: We analyzed 408 910 PrEP prescriptions issued to 39 809 PrEP users using a national insurance claims database that contained commercial and Medicaid claims. We identified PrEP use based on pharmacy claims and outpatient diagnostic coding. We evaluated the percentage of PrEP prescription refills without HIV testing (identified by CPT codes) within the prior 3, 6, and 12 months using time to event methods. We performed subgroup and multivariate analyses by age, gender, race, insurance type, and geography., Results: Of 39 809 persons, 36 197 were commercially insured, 3612 were Medicaid-insured, and 96% identified as male; the median age (interquartile range) was 34 (29-44) years, and the Medicaid-insured PrEP users were 24% Black/African American, 44% White, and 9% Hispanic/Latinx. Within the prior 3, 6, and 12 months, respectively, the percentage of PrEP prescription fills in individuals without HIV Ag/Ab testing was 34.3% (95% CI, 34.2%-34.5%), 23.8% (95% CI, 23.7%-23.9%), and 16.6% (95% CI, 16.4%-16.7%), and the percentage without any type of HIV test was 25.8% (95% CI, 25.6%-25.9%), 14.6% (95% CI, 14.5%-14.7%), and 7.8% (95% CI, 7.7%-7.9%)., Conclusions: Approximately 1 in 3 oral PrEP prescriptions were filled in persons who had not received an HIV Ag/Ab test within the prior 3 months, with evidence of health disparities. These findings inform clinical PrEP monitoring efforts and compliance with national HIV testing guidance to monitor PrEP users., Competing Interests: Potential conflicts of interest. Jason Baron, MD, Tamar Tchelidze, MD, MPH, Ben La Brot, MD, and Nicole Robinson, PhD, are employees of Roche Diagnostics, receiving employee compensation that in some cases may include equity awards. In addition to his role at Roche, Dr. Baron has a part-time research faculty position at the Massachusetts General Hospital; Dr. Baron worked on this paper solely in his capacity as a Roche employee. Drs. Yao, Mayer, Kuritzkes, and Patel had previously received consulting honoraria from Roche but were not paid for work on this study. Dr. Yao has also received research support from Roche not connected to this study. Additional disclosures are as follows. Dr. Mayer: research support paid to institution from Gilead Sciences, Merck Inc., GlaxoSmithKlein, and Moderna and scientific advisory boards for Gilead Sciences and Merck Inc. Dr. Patel: ViiV Healthcare. Dr. Kuritzkes: consulting honoraria and/or research support from AbbVie, Gilead Sciences, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Merck, and ViiV. All other authors report no potential conflicts., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF