101. Cannabis for the Management of Pain: Assessment of Safety Study (COMPASS)
- Author
-
Mark A. Ware, Tongtong Wang, Stan Shapiro, Jean-Paul Collet, Aline Boulanger, John M. Esdaile, Allan Gordon, Mary Lynch, Dwight E. Moulin, and Colleen O'Connell
- Subjects
safety ,Adult ,Male ,Quality Control ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Canada ,Maximum Tolerated Dose ,Clinical Neurology ,Medical Marijuana ,Young Adult ,Cognition ,Quality of life ,Pain assessment ,Internal medicine ,cohort study ,Medicine ,Humans ,Pain Management ,Dronabinol ,Prospective Studies ,Adverse effect ,Prospective cohort study ,Cannabis ,Aged ,Aged, 80 and over ,biology ,Dose-Response Relationship, Drug ,business.industry ,Chronic pain ,Middle Aged ,biology.organism_classification ,medicine.disease ,adverse events ,3. Good health ,Mood ,Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine ,Neurology ,Physical therapy ,Quality of Life ,Female ,Neurology (clinical) ,Chronic Pain ,business ,Cohort study - Abstract
Cannabis is widely used as a self-management strategy by patients with a wide range of symptoms and diseases including chronic non-cancer pain. The safety of cannabis use for medical purposes has not been systematically evaluated. We conducted a prospective cohort study to describe safety issues among individuals with chronic non-cancer pain. A standardized herbal cannabis product (12.5% tetrahydrocannabinol) was dispensed to eligible individuals for a 1-year period; controls were individuals with chronic pain from the same clinics who were not cannabis users. The primary outcome consisted of serious adverse events and non-serious adverse events. Secondary safety outcomes included pulmonary and neurocognitive function and standard hematology, biochemistry, renal, liver, and endocrine function. Secondary efficacy parameters included pain and other symptoms, mood, and quality of life. Two hundred and fifteen individuals with chronic pain were recruited to the cannabis group (141 current users and 58 ex-users) and 216 controls (chronic pain but no current cannabis use) from 7 clinics across Canada. The median daily cannabis dose was 2.5 g/d. There was no difference in risk of serious adverse events (adjusted incidence rate ratio = 1.08, 95% confidence interval = .57–2.04) between groups. Medical cannabis users were at increased risk of non-serious adverse events (adjusted incidence rate ratio = 1.73, 95% confidence interval = 1.41–2.13); most were mild to moderate. There were no differences in secondary safety assessments. Quality-controlled herbal cannabis, when used by patients with experience of cannabis use as part of a monitored treatment program over 1 year, appears to have a reasonable safety profile. Longer-term monitoring for functional outcomes is needed. Study registration The study was registered with www.controlled-trials.com (ISRCTN19449752). Perspective This study evaluated the safety of cannabis use by patients with chronic pain over 1 year. The study found that there was a higher rate of adverse events among cannabis users compared with controls but not for serious adverse events at an average dose of 2.5 g herbal cannabis per day.
- Published
- 2015