Search

There is a lack of trustworthy evidence-informed guidelines on the diagnosis and management of acute appendicitis in elderly patients. We developed a rapid guideline in accordance with GRADE and AGREE II standards. The steering group consisted of general surgeons, members of the EAES Research Committee/Guidelines Subcommittee with expertise and experience in guideline development, advanced medical statistics and evidence synthesis, biostatisticians, and a guideline methodologist. The guideline panel consisted of three general surgeons, an intensive care physician, a geriatrician and a patient advocate. We conducted systematic reviews and the results of evidence synthesis were summarized in evidence tables. Recommendations were authored and published through an online authoring and publication platform (MAGICapp), with the guideline panel making use of an evidence-to-decision framework and a Delphi process to arrive at consensus. This rapid guideline provides a weak recommendation against the use of clinical scoring systems to replace cross-sectional imaging in the diagnostic approach of suspected appendicitis in elderly patients. It provides a weak recommendation against the use of antibiotics alone over surgical treatment in patients who are deemed fit for surgery, and a weak recommendation for laparoscopic over open surgery. Furthermore, it provides a summary of surgery-associated risks in elderly patients. The guidelines, with recommendations, evidence summaries and decision aids in user-friendly formats can also be accessed in MAGICapp: https://app.magicapp.org/#/guideline/4494 . This rapid guideline provides evidence-informed trustworthy recommendations on the diagnosis and management of acute appendicitis in elderly patients.

Background Dexamethasone decreases mortality in patients with severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and has become the standard of care during the second wave of pandemic. Dexamethasone is an immunosuppressive treatment potentially increasing the risk of secondary hospital acquired infections in critically ill patients. We conducted an observational retrospective study in three French intensive care units (ICUs) comparing the first and second waves of pandemic to investigate the role of dexamethasone in the occurrence of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) and blood stream infections (BSI). Patients admitted from March to November 2020 with a documented COVID-19 and requiring mechanical ventilation (MV) for ≥ 48 h were included. The main study outcomes were the incidence of VAP and BSI according to the use of dexamethasone. Secondary outcomes were the ventilator-free days (VFD) at day-28 and day-60, ICU and hospital length of stay and mortality. Results Among the 151 patients included, 84 received dexamethasone, all but one during the second wave. VAP occurred in 63% of patients treated with dexamethasone (DEXA+) and 57% in those not receiving dexamethasone (DEXA−) (p = 0.43). The cumulative incidence of VAP, considering death, duration of MV and late immunosuppression as competing factors was not different between groups (p = 0.59). A multivariate analysis did not identify dexamethasone as an independent risk factor for VAP occurrence. The occurrence of BSI was not different between groups (29 vs. 30%; p = 0.86). DEXA+ patients had more VFD at day-28 (9 (0–21) vs. 0 (0–11) days; p = 0.009) and a reduced ICU length of stay (20 (11–44) vs. 32 (17–46) days; p = 0.01). Mortality did not differ between groups. Conclusions In this cohort of COVID-19 patients requiring invasive MV, dexamethasone was not associated with an increased incidence of VAP or BSI. Dexamethasone might not explain the high rates of VAP and BSI observed in critically ill COVID-19 patients.

International audience; BACKGROUND: Delaying renal replacement therapy (RRT) for some time in critically ill patients with severe acute kidney injury and no severe complication is safe and allows optimisation of the use of medical devices. Major uncertainty remains concerning the duration for which RRT can be postponed without risk. Our aim was to test the hypothesis that a more-delayed initiation strategy would result in more RRT-free days, compared with a delayed strategy. METHODS: This was an unmasked, multicentre, prospective, open-label, randomised, controlled trial done in 39 intensive care units in France. We monitored critically ill patients with severe acute kidney injury (defined as Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes stage 3) until they had oliguria for more than 72 h or a blood urea nitrogen concentration higher than 112 mg/dL. Patients were then randomly assigned (1:1) to either a strategy (delayed strategy) in which RRT was started just after randomisation or to a more-delayed strategy. With the more-delayed strategy, RRT initiation was postponed until mandatory indication (noticeable hyperkalaemia or metabolic acidosis or pulmonary oedema) or until blood urea nitrogen concentration reached 140 mg/dL. The primary outcome was the number of days alive and free of RRT between randomisation and day 28 and was done in the intention-to-treat population. The study is registered with ClinicalTrial.gov, NCT03396757 and is completed. FINDINGS: Between May 7, 2018, and Oct 11, 2019, of 5336 patients assessed, 278 patients underwent randomisation; 137 were assigned to the delayed strategy and 141 to the more-delayed strategy. The number of complications potentially related to acute kidney injury or to RRT were similar between groups. The median number of RRT-free days was 12 days (IQR 0-25) in the delayed strategy and 10 days (IQR 0-24) in the more-delayed strategy (p=0·93). In a multivariable analysis, the hazard ratio for death at 60 days was 1·65 (95% CI 1·09-2·50, p=0·018) with the more-delayed versus the delayed strategy. The number of complications potentially related to acute kidney injury or renal replacement therapy did not differ between groups. INTERPRETATION: In severe acute kidney injury patients with oliguria for more than 72 h or blood urea nitrogen concentration higher than 112 mg/dL and no severe complication that would mandate immediate RRT, longer postponing of RRT initiation did not confer additional benefit and was associated with potential harm. FUNDING: Programme Hospitalier de Recherche Clinique.

Non-invasive respiratory support including high-flow nasal oxygen (HFNO), continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) or bilevel positive airway pressure (BiPAP) is routinely used in the perioperative period. The aim of this narrative review was to discuss some of the existing literature on perioperative non-invasive respiratory support outlining its potential roles in each of the three perioperative periods (pre-, intra- and postoperatively) and to propose the way forward. During induction of anesthesia, non-invasive ventilation (NIV) was associated with improved ventilatory variables and reduced risk of postoperative respiratory complications. HFNO did not seem to confer an advantage in terms of peri-intubation hypoxemia. Intraoperative data on NIV are scarce. Upper airway obstruction and worsening hypoventilation are two risks associated with its use. Compared with conventional oxygenation, HFNO is associated with a reduced risk of hypoxemia. Postoperative NIV has been associated with improved arterial blood gases and a reduced reintubation rate, but no difference was reported for mortality, hospital length of stay, rate of anastomotic leakage, pneumonia-related complications and sepsis or infections. Head-to-head comparison of HFNO versus BiPAP showed no advantage to either mode of support. In the preoperative setting, NIV seems to be associated with improved clinical outcomes in specific patient subgroups (obesity, pregnancy). In the postoperative setting, both NIV and HFNO were associated with lower reintubation rates. The literature has provided little evidence regarding the use of non-invasive ventilatory support in other patient subgroups or intraoperatively. There is also little literature regarding the appropriateness of combining different modes of support. In the next years, the combination of several modes of respiratory support should be assessed in targeted populations.

Background While aminoglycosides (AG) have been used for decades, debate remains on their optimal dosing strategy. We investigated the international practices of AG usage specifically regarding dosing and therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) in critically ill patients. We conducted a prospective, multicentre, observational, cohort study in 59 intensive-care units (ICUs) in 5 countries enrolling all ICU patients receiving AG therapy for septic shock. Results We enrolled 931 septic ICU patients [mean ± standard deviation, age 63 ± 15 years, female 364 (39%), median (IQR) SAPS II 51 (38–65)] receiving AG as part of empirical (761, 84%) or directed (147, 16%) therapy. The AG used was amikacin in 614 (66%), gentamicin in 303 (33%), and tobramycin in 14 (1%) patients. The median (IQR) duration of therapy was 2 (1–3) days, the number of doses was 2 (1–2), the median dose was 25 ± 6, 6 ± 2, and 6 ± 2 mg/kg for amikacin, gentamicin, and tobramycin respectively, and the median dosing interval was 26 (23.5–43.5) h. TDM of Cmax and Cmin was performed in 437 (47%) and 501 (57%) patients, respectively, after the first dose with 295 (68%) patients achieving a Cmax/MIC > 8 and 353 (71%) having concentrations above Cmin recommended thresholds. The ICU mortality rate was 27% with multivariable analysis showing no correlation between AG dosing or pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic target attainment and clinical outcomes. Conclusion Short courses of high AG doses are mainly used in ICU patients with septic shock, although wide variability in AG usage is reported. We could show no correlation between PK/PD target attainment and clinical outcome. Efforts to optimize the first AG dose remain necessary. Trial registration Clinical Trials, NCT02850029, registered on 29th July 2016, retrospectively registered, https://www.clinicaltrials.gov

Purpose To describe the clinical characteristics and outcomes of coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19)-associated pulmonary thromboembolism (PTE). Materials and methods A case series of five patients, representing the clinical spectrum of COVID-19 associated PTE. Patients were admitted to four hospitals in Germany, Italy, and France. Infection with Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) was confirmed using a real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction test. Results The onset of PTE varied from 2 to 4 weeks after the occurrence of the initial symptoms of SARS-CoV-2 infection and led to deterioration of the clinical picture in all cases. PTE was the primary reason for hospital admission after a 2-week period of self-isolation at home (1 patient) and hospital readmission after initial uncomplicated hospital discharge (2 patients). Three of the patients had no past history of clinically relevant risk factors for venous thromboembolism (VTE). Severe disease progression was associated with concomitant increases in IL-6, ferritin, and D-Dimer levels. The outcome from PTE was related to the extent of vascular involvement, and associated complications. Conclusion PTE is a potential life-threatening complication, which occurs frequently in patients with COVID-19. Intermediate therapeutic dose of anticoagulants and extend thromboprophylaxis are necessary after meticulous risk-benefit assessment., Highlights • Pulnonary thromboembolism (PTE) is a frequent life-threatening complication in patients with coronavirsus disease-2019 (COVID-19). • The onset of PTE varies from 2 to 4 weeks after the occurrence of the initial symptoms and may occur during home self-isolation or after hospital discharge of primarily uncomplicated hospital admission. • PTE may occur in patients without clinically relevant past history of risk factors for venous thromboembolism and in those receiving standard prophylactic anticoagulation. • Intermediate therapeutic dose of anticoagulants and extend thromboprophylaxis are necessary in these patients after meticulous risk-benefit assessment.

Our goal was to determine the relevant variables and patient phenotypes to predict sepsis outcomes. We performed an ancillary study concerning 119 patients from three intensive care units (ICUs) in septic shock at ICU admittance (T0). We defined clinical worsening as having an increased Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score ≥ 1 48 hours after admission (ΔSOFA ≥ 1). We performed univariate and multivariate analyses according to 28-day mortality rate and ΔSOFA ≥ 1, and determined three patient phenotypes: safe, intermediate and poor. Persistence of the intermediate and poor phenotypes after T0 were defined as poor outcomes. At T0, the multivariate analysis showed two variables associated with 28-day mortality rate: norepinephrine dose and serum lactate concentration. Regarding ΔSOFA ≥ 1, we identified three variables at T0: norepinephrine dose, serum lactate concentration and venous-to-arterial carbon dioxide partial pressure difference (P(v-a)CO2). At T0, the three phenotypes (safe, intermediate, and poor) were distributed in 28 (24%), 70 (59%) and 21 (18%) patients, respectively. We thus suggested an algorithm featuring norepinephrine dose, serum lactate concentration and P(v-a)CO2 to predict patient outcomes and obtained an area under the curve (AUC) of 74% (63–85%). In conclusion, our findings underline that identifying relevant variables and phenotypes may help physicians recognize patient outcomes.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS Kidney failure is the second most frequent condition after acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) in critically ill patients with severe COVID-19 and is strongly associated with mortality. The aim of this multicentric study was to assess the impact of the specific treatments of COVID-19 and ARDS on the risk of severe acute kidney injury (AKI) in critically ill COVID patients. METHOD Data from a prospectively collected database of consecutive patients hospitalized in six ICUs for COVID-19 was retrospectively analysed. The incidence and severity of AKI were monitored during the entire ICU stay. Patients older than 18 years hospitalized in for COVID-19-related ARDS requiring mechanical ventilation were included. RESULTS A total of 164 patients were included in the final analysis, 97 (59.1%) displayed AKI, of which 39 had severe stage 3 AKI and 21 (12.8%) requiring renal replacement therapy (RRT). In univariate analysis, severe AKI was associated with ACEI exposure (P = .016), high blood pressure (P = .029), APACHE-II score (P = .004) and mortality at D28 (P = .008), D60 (P CONCLUSION Dexamethasone seems to prevent the risk of severe AKI and RRT, and iNO seems associated with severe AKI and RRT in critically ill patients with COVID-19. iNO must be used with caution in COVID-19 related ARDS.

BackgroundLung ultrasound (LUS) is a validated tool for the management of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-related pneumonia. An awake prone positioning (PP) improves oxygenation and outcomes in COVID-19 non-intubated patients, but its tolerance remains an issue. A chair positioning (CP) may have beneficial effects on oxygenation and lung aeration. Thus, CP could be an easier alternative to PP. This study assessed the effects of a CP session on oxygenation (using SpO2:FiO2 ratio) and lung aeration (using lung reaeration score) changes in non-intubated COVID-19 patients. Methods An observational multicenter study was conducted in three university hospital intensive care units (ICUs). We retrospectively analyzed prospectively collected data from LUS exams performed before and after a CP session in non-intubated COVID-19 patients. Patients were divided into groups of responders or non-responders in terms of oxygenation and lung aeration.ResultsOf the 33 patients included in the study, 14 (44%) were oxygenation non-responders and 18 (56%) were oxygenation responders, and 13 (40.6%) and 19 (59.4%) patients were classified as lung aeration non-responders and responders, respectively. Changes in oxygenation and lung aeration before and after a CP session were not correlated (Pearson’s r = -0.19, p = 0.3, 95% CI: -0.5–0.17). The reaeration scores did not differ between oxygenation responders and non-responders (1 [-0.75–3.75] vs. 4, [-1–6], p = 0.41). The LUS score was significantly correlated with SpO2:FiO2 ratio before a CP session (Pearson’s r = 0.37, p = 0.04, 95% CI: 0.03–0.64) but not after (Pearson’s r = 0.17, p = 0.35, 95% CI: -0.19–0.50). Conclusion A CP session was associated with improved oxygenation and lung aeration in more than half of the non-intubated COVID-19 patients. However, oxygenation and lung aeration changes were not associated, suggesting that a CP session induces a ventilation:perfusion matching alteration.

Background: Local anesthetic systemic toxicity (LAST) has been reported as a serious complication of local anesthetic (LA) peripheral injection. The signs and symptoms of LAST are highly variable, and the challenge remains to confirm its diagnosis. In this context, the determination of LA plasma concentration appears as a valuable tool to confirm LAST diagnosis. The aims of this study were to describe observed LA concentrations in patients suspected with LAST and their contribution to diagnostic confirmation. Methods: We retrospectively reported suspected LAST in patients for which at least one plasma LA concentration was determined to confirm diagnosis of LAST. Data collection came from our pharmacological laboratory’s database. Clinical signs and symptoms of toxicity, their onset time and observed LA concentrations were used to confirm LAST diagnosis. Results: 33 patients who presented with suspected LAST after ropivacaine and/or lidocaine administration were included. Prodromal symptoms were observed in 13 patients. Isolated central nervous system (CNS) toxicity occurred in 11 patients, and combined CNS and cardiovascular toxicity occurred in 12. One, two or three venous plasma samples were performed in 11, 3 and 19 patients, respectively. Toxic plasma LA concentrations were observed in three patients, receiving peripheral LA injection using lidocaine (16.1 µg/mL) and ropivacaine (4.2 and 4.8 µg/mL). Conclusion: This study presents an important biological and clinical dataset of patients who presented with suspected LAST. Plasma LA concentrations could bring valuable information in the diagnosis of LAST but requires rigorous sample protocols.

Although epidemiologic research has demonstrated significant differences in incidence and outcomes of sepsis according to sex, their underlying biological mechanisms are poorly understood. Here, we studied the influence of hormonal status by comparing in vivo cardiac performances measured by MRI in non-ovariectomized and ovariectomized septic female rats. Control and ovariectomized rats were randomly allocated to the following groups: sham, sepsis and sepsis plus landiolol. Sepsis was induced by caecum ligation and punction (CLP). Landiolol, a short-acting selective β1-adrenergic blocker improving the in vivo cardiac performance of septic male rats was perfused continuously after sepsis induction. Cardiac MRI was carried out 18 h after induction of sepsis to assess in vivo cardiac function. Capillary permeability was evaluated by Evans Blue administration and measurement of its tissue extravasation. Variation in myocardial gene and protein expression was also assessed by qPCR and western-blot in the left ventricular tissue. Sepsis reduced indexed stroke volume, cardiac index and indexed end-diastolic volume compared to sham group in ovariectomized females whereas it had no effect in control females. This was associated with an overexpression of JAK2 expression and STAT3 phosphorylation on Ser727 site, and an inhibition of the adrenergic pathways in OVR females. Landiolol increased the indexed stroke volume by reversing the indexed end-diastolic volume reduction after sepsis in ovariectomized females, while it decreased indexed stroke volume and cardiac index in control. This was supported by an overexpression of genes involved in calcium influx in OVR females while an inactivation of the β-adrenergic and a calcium efflux pathway was observed in control females. Sepsis decreased in vivo cardiac performances in ovariectomized females but not in control females, presumably associated with a more pronounced inflammation, inhibition of the adrenergic pathway and calcium efflux defects. Administration of landiolol prevents this cardiac dysfunction in ovariectomized females with a probable activation of calcium influx, while it has deleterious effects in control females in which calcium efflux pathways were down-regulated.

Background: Patients with schizophrenia (SCZ) represent a vulnerable population who have been understudied in COVID-19 research. We aimed to establish whether health outcomes and care differed between patients with SCZ and patients without a diagnosis of severe mental illness. Methods: We conducted a population-based cohort study of all patients with identified COVID-19 and respiratory symptoms who were hospitalized in France between February and June 2020. Cases were patients who had a diagnosis of SCZ. Controls were patients who did not have a diagnosis of severe mental illness. The outcomes were in-hospital mortality and intensive care unit (ICU) admission. Findings: A total of 50,750 patients were included, of whom 823 were SCZ patients (1.6%). The SCZ patients had an increased in-hospital mortality (25.6% vs. 21.7%; adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 1.30 [95% CI 1.08-1.56], p=0.0093) and a decreased ICU admission rate (23.7% vs. 28.4%; aOR 0.75 [95% CI 0.62-0.91], p=0.0062) compared to controls. Significant interactions between SCZ and age for mortality and ICU admission were observed (p=0.0006 and p

Resume La decontamination digestive selective (DDS) a pour but de reduire la masse de la flore bacterienne digestive pour prevenir la survenue d’infection en reanimation et notamment de pneumopathie acquise sous ventilation mecanique. Elle repose sur l’administration d’une association d’antibiotiques par voie digestive et systemique. Plusieurs etudes ont montre que la DDS reduisait la mortalite et le taux de pneumopathies dans les reanimations a faible taux de resistance bacteriennes. La DDS comporte le risque de developper des infections a germes resistants et les etudes ou le taux de resistance est eleve sont mois probantes que les precedentes. Cependant, les etudes ne confirment pas formellement ce risque.

Background Fibrinogen concentrate is widely used in traumatic hemorrhagic shock despite weak evidence in the literature. The aim of the study was to evaluate the effect of fibrinogen concentrate administration within the first 6 hours on 24-hour all-cause mortality in traumatic hemorrhagic shock using a causal inference approach. Methods Observational study from a French multicenter prospective trauma registry was performed. Hemorrhagic shock was defined as transfusion of four or more red blood cell units within the first 6 hours after admission. The confounding variables for the outcome (24-hour all-cause mortality) and treatment allocation (fibrinogen concentrate administration within the first 6 hours) were chosen by a Delphi method. The propensity score was specified with a data-adaptive algorithm and a doubly-robust approach with inverse proportionality of treatment weighting allowed to compute the average treatment effect. Sensitivity analyses were performed. Results Of 14,336 patients in the registry during the study period, 1,027 in hemorrhagic shock were analyzed (758 receiving fibrinogen concentrate within 6 hours and 269 not receiving fibrinogen concentrate). The average treatment effect, expressed as a risk difference, was -0.031 (95% confidence interval, -0.084 to 0.021). All sensitivity analysis confirmed the results. Conclusions Fibrinogen concentrate administration within the first 6 hours of a traumatic hemorrhagic shock did not decrease 24-hour all-cause mortality. Level of evidence Prognostic, level III.

BACKGROUND Postoperative pulmonary complications are associated with increased morbidity. Identifying patients at higher risk for such complications may allow preemptive treatment. METHODS Patients with an American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score >1 and who were scheduled for major surgery of >2 hours were enrolled in a single-center prospective study. After extubation, lung ultrasound was performed after a median time of 60 minutes by 2 certified anesthesiologists in the postanesthesia care unit after a standardized tracheal extubation. Postoperative pulmonary complications occurring within 8 postoperative days were recorded. The association between lung ultrasound findings and postoperative pulmonary complications was analyzed using logistic regression models. RESULTS Among the 327 patients included, 69 (19%) developed postoperative pulmonary complications. The lung ultrasound score was higher in the patients who developed postoperative pulmonary complications (12 [7-18] vs 8 [4-12]; P < .001). The odds ratio for pulmonary complications in patients who had a pleural effusion detected by lung ultrasound was 3.7 (95% confidence interval, 1.2-11.7). The hospital death rate was also higher in patients with pleural effusions (22% vs 1.3%; P < .001). Patients with pulmonary consolidations on lung ultrasound had a higher risk of postoperative mechanical ventilation (17% vs 5.1%; P = .001). In all patients, the area under the curve for predicting postoperative pulmonary complications was 0.64 (95% confidence interval, 0.57-0.71). CONCLUSIONS When lung ultrasound is performed precociously

This study aimed to determine the prevalence of withholding or withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy (WLST) decisions in trauma ICU patients, using a large registry. We hypothesised that this prevalence is similar to that of the general population admitted to an ICU. As secondary aims, it sought to describe the trauma patients for whom the decision was made for WLST and the factors associated with this decision.This observational study assessed data from 14 French centres listed in the TraumaBaseTM registry. All trauma patients hospitalised for more than 48 h were pro-spectively included.Data from 8569 trauma patients, obtained from January 2016 to December 2018, were included in this study. A WLST decision was made in 6% of all cases. In the WLST group, 67% of the patients were older men (age: 62 versus 36, P 0.001); more often they had a prior medical history and higher median severity scores than the patients in the no WLST decision group; SAPS II 58 (46 to 69) versus 21 (13 to 35) and ISS 26 (22 to 24) versus 12 (5 to 22), P 0.001. Neurological status was strongly associated with WLST decisions. The geographic area of the ICUs affected the rate of the WLST decisions. The ICU mortality was 11% (n = 907) of which 47% (n = 422) were preceded by WLST decisions. Fourteen percent of WLST orders were not associated to the death.Among 8569 patients, medical history, trauma severity criteria, notably neurological status and geographical areas were associated with WLST. These regional differences deserve to be investigated in future studies.

Prognosis of herpetic encephalitis remains severe, with a high proportion of deaths and sequelae. Its treatment is based on acyclovir, but the precise and most effective modalities of this treatment are not established. The objective of this study was to determine them.For this, we carried out a descriptive, retrospective, monocentric study, using the current coding database at Marseille University Hospitals. Cohort was intended to be exhaustive for the disease, from January 2000 to June 2019, including patients hospitalized in intensive care and conventional hospitalization sector. Patients (n = 76) included were at least 16 years of age and had a clinical presentation, cerebral Magnetic Resonance Imaging, and/or electroencephalogram abnormalities consistent with herpetic encephalitis confirmed by a positive HSV-PCR in the CSF. Clinical data and treatment, including the doses actually administered to the patient, were compared according to patient's outcome.The mortality rate was 12%, whereas 49% had complete recovery and 39% sequelae impeding independence. Poor outcome was statistically associated with persistence of confusion, aphasia, and impaired consciousness lasting more than 5 days, superinfection, status epilepticus, and length of stay in intensive care unit. A statistical decision tree, constructed using the Classification And Regression Tree model, to prioritize treatment management, showed two main factors that influence the outcome: the patient's weight, and the average daily acyclovir dose actually administered.These results suggest to modify acyclovir management in herpetic encephalitis, for low-weight patients ( 79 kg) with a minimum dosage of 2550 mg/day (850 mg/ 8 h), when possible.

International audience

Objectives The association between outcome and kidney injury detected at discharge from the ICU using different biomarkers remains unknown. The objective was to evaluate the association between 1-year survival and kidney injury at ICU discharge. Design Ancillary investigation of a prospective observational study. Setting Twenty-one ICUs with 1-year follow-up. Patients Critically ill patients receiving mechanical ventilation and/or hemodynamic support for at least 24 hours were included. Interventions Serum creatinine, plasma Cystatin C, plasma neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin, urinary neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin, plasma Proenkephalin A 119-159, and estimated glomerular filtration rate (on serum creatinine and plasma Cystatin C) were measured at ICU discharge among ICU survivors. Measurements and main results The association between kidney biomarkers at discharge and mortality was estimated using logistic model with and without adjustment for prognostic factors previously identified in this cohort. Subgroup analyses were performed in patients with discharge serum creatinine less than 1.5-fold baseline at ICU discharge. Among 1,207 ICU survivors included, 231 died during the year following ICU discharge (19.2%). Estimated glomerular filtration rate was significantly lower and kidney injury biomarkers higher at discharge in nonsurvivors. The association between biomarker levels or estimated glomerular filtration rate and mortality remained after adjustment to potential cofounding factors influencing outcome. In patients with low serum creatinine at ICU discharge, 25-47% of patients were classified as subclinical kidney injury depending on the biomarker. The association between kidney biomarkers and mortality remained and mortality was higher than patients without subclinical kidney injury. The majority of patients who developed acute kidney injury during ICU stay had elevated biomarkers of kidney injury at discharge even with apparent recovery based on serum creatinine (i.e., subclinical acute kidney disease). Conclusions Elevated kidney biomarkers measured at ICU discharge are associated with poor 1-year outcome, including in patients with low serum creatinine at ICU discharge.

Background Rapid response teams are intended to improve early diagnosis and intervention in ward patients who develop acute respiratory or circulatory failure. A management protocol including the use of a handheld ultrasound device for immediate point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) examination at the bedside may improve team performance. The main objective of the study was to assess the impact of implementing such a POCUS-guided management on the proportion of adequate immediate diagnoses in two groups. Secondary endpoints included time to treatment and patient outcomes. Methods A prospective, observational, controlled study was conducted in a single university hospital. Two teams alternated every other day for managing in-hospital ward patients developing acute respiratory and/or circulatory failures. Only one of the team used an ultrasound device (POCUS group). Results We included 165 patients (POCUS group 83, control group 82). Proportion of adequate immediate diagnoses was 94% in the POCUS group and 80% in the control group (p = 0.009). Time to first treatment/intervention was shorter in the POCUS group (15 [10–25] min vs. 34 [15–40] min, p p = 0.007), but this difference was not confirmed in the propensity score sample (29% vs. 34%, p = 0.53). Conclusion Our study suggests that protocolized use of a handheld POCUS device at the bedside in the ward may improve the proportion of adequate diagnosis, the time to initial treatment and perhaps also survival of ward patients developing acute respiratory or circulatory failure. Clinical Trial Registration NCT02967809. Registered 18 November 2016, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02967809.

Early diagnosis and prompt management of acute mesenteric ischaemia (AMI) are key to survival but remain extremely difficult, due to vague and non-specific symptoms. Serum lactate (SL) is commonly presented as a useful biomarker for the diagnosis or prognosis of AMI. The aim of our study was test SL (1) as a diagnostic marker and (2) as a prognostic marker for AMI.This was an ancillary multicentre case-control study. Patients with AMI at intensive care unit (ICU) admission were included (AMI group) and matched to ICU patients without AMI (control group). SL was measured and compared on day 0 (D0) and day 1 (D1). Diagnosis and prognosis accuracy were assessed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and their area under the curve (AUC).Each group consisted of 137 matched ICU patients. There was no significant difference of SL between the two groups at D0 or at D1 (p = 0.26 and p = 0.29 respectively). SL was a poor marker of AMI: at D0 and D1, AUC were respectively 0.57 [0.51; 0.63] and 0.60 [0.53; 0.67]. SL at D0 and D1 correctly predicted ICU mortality, independently of AMI (AUC D0: 0.69 [0.59; 0.79] vs. 0.74 [0.65; 0.82]; p = 0.51 and D1: 0.74 [0.64; 0.84] vs. 0.76 [0.66; 0.87]; p = 0.77, respectively, for control and AMI groups].SL has no specific link with AMI, both for diagnosis and prognosis. SL should not be used for the diagnosis of AMI but, despite its lack of specificity, it may help to assess severity.

International audience; OBJECTIVES: To describe clinical characteristics and management of intensive care units (ICU) patients with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 and to determine 90-day mortality after ICU admission and associated risk factors. METHODS: This observational retrospective study was conducted in six intensive care units (ICUs) in three university hospitals in Marseille, France. Between 10 March and 10 May 2020, all adult patients admitted in ICU with laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 and respiratory failure were eligible for inclusion. The statistical analysis was focused on the mechanically ventilated patients. The primary outcome was the 90-day mortality after ICU admission. RESULTS: Included in the study were 172 patients with COVID-19 related respiratory failure, 117 of whom (67%) received invasive mechanical ventilation. 90-day mortality of the invasively ventilated patients was 27.4%. Median duration of ventilation and median length of stay in ICU for these patients were 20 (9-33) days and 29 (17-46) days. Mortality increased with the severity of ARDS at ICU admission. After multivariable analysis was carried out, risk factors associated with 90-day mortality were age, elevated Charlson comorbidity index, chronic statins intake and occurrence of an arterial thrombosis. CONCLUSION: In this cohort, age and number of comorbidities were the main predictors of mortality in invasively ventilated patients. The only modifiable factor associated with mortality in multivariate analysis was arterial thrombosis.

Introduction Concomitant experimental/compassionate drug administration has been all-pervasive in the treatment of COVID-19 patients. The objective of this study was to study the relationship between patient severity, the number of experimental/compassionate medications received (main outcome measure), and patient outcomes [survival to hospital discharge and length of hospital stay (LOS)]. Methods Retrospective analysis of data collected in real time during the first pandemic wave in a tertiary care hospital. Data included patient demographics, comorbidities, admission vital signs, laboratory values, most extreme respiratory intervention during hospitalization, and data regarding treatment with compassionate/experimental drugs during their stay. Results Overall, 292 PCR-confirmed patients with symptoms of COVID-19 were studied (March/April, 2020). Increasing respiratory support correlated with both LOS and mortality. Patients were more likely to receive more than 1 experimental/compassionate drugs as respiratory support escalated, ranging from 3% (n = 4/136) among patients on room air to 77.3% (n = 17/22) of mechanically ventilated/ECMO patients (P

PURPOSE OF REVIEW The aim of this study was to outline the management of the patient with the open abdomen. RECENT FINDINGS An open abdomen approach is used after damage control laparotomy, to decrease risk for postsurgery intra-abdominal hypertension, if reoperation is likely and after primary abdominal decompression.Temporary abdominal wall closure without negative pressure is associated with higher rates of intra-abdominal infection and evisceration. Negative pressure systems improve fascial closure rates but increase fistula formation. Definitive abdominal wall closure should be considered once oedema has subsided and the patient has stabilized. Delayed abdominal closure after trauma (>24-48 h) is associated with less achievement of fascial closure and more complications. Protective lung ventilation should be employed early, particularly if respiratory compromise is evident. Conservative fluid management and less sedation may decrease delirium and increase definitive abdominal closure rates. Extubation may be performed before definitive abdominal closure in selected patients. Antibiotic therapy should be brief, targeted and guideline concordant. Survival depends on the underlying disease, the closure method and the course of hospitalization. SUMMARY Changes in the treatment of patients with the open abdomen include negative temporary closure, conservative fluid management, early protective lung ventilation, decreased sedation and extubation before abdominal closure in selected patients.

Background Deviation from guidelines is frequent in emergency situations and this may lead to increased mortality. Probably because of time constraints, 55% is the greatest reported guidelines compliance rate in severe trauma patients. This study aimed to identify among all available recommendations a reasonable bundle of items that should be followed to optimize the outcome of hemorrhagic shocks (HS) and severe traumatic brain injuries (TBI). Methods We first estimated the compliance with French and European guidelines using the data from the French TraumaBase® registry. Then, we used a machine learning procedure to reduce the number of recommendations into a minimal set of items to be followed to minimize 7-day mortality. We evaluated the bundles using an external validation cohort. Results This study included 5,924 trauma patients (1,414 HS and 4,955 TBI) between 2011 and August 2019 and studied compliance to 36 recommendation items. Overall compliance rate to recommendation items was 71.6% and 66.9% for HS and TBI respectively. In HS, compliance was significantly associated with 7-day decreased mortality in univariate analysis but not in multivariate analysis (RR = 0.91, 95%CI = 0.90-1.17, p = 0.06). In TBI, compliance was significantly associated with decreased mortality in univariate and multivariate analysis (RR = 0.85, 95%CI = 0.75-0.92, p = 0.01). For HS, the bundle included 13 recommendation items. In the validation cohort, when this bundle was applied, patients were found to have a lower 7-day mortality rate (RR = 0.46, 95%CI = 0.27-0.63, p = 0.01). In TBI, the bundle included 7 items. In the validation cohort, when this bundle was applied, patients had a lower 7-day mortality rate (RR = 0.55, 95%CI = 0.34-0.71, p = 0.02). Discussion Using a machine-learning procedure, we were able to identify a subset of recommendations that minimizes 7-day mortality following traumatic HS and TBI. These two bundles remain to be evaluated in a prospective manner. Level of evidence II.

Background An association was reported between the left ventricular longitudinal strain (LV-LS) and preload. LV-LS reflects the left cardiac function curve as it is the ratio of shortening over diastolic dimension. The aim of this study was to determine the sensitivity and specificity of LV-LS variations after a passive leg raising (PLR) maneuver to predict fluid responsiveness in intensive care unit (ICU) patients with acute circulatory failure (ACF). Methods Patients with ACF were prospectively included. Preload-dependency was defined as a velocity time integral (VTI) variation greater than 10% between baseline (T0) and PLR (T1), distinguishing the preload-dependent (PLD+) group and the preload-independent (PLD-) group. A 7-cycles, 4-chamber echocardiography loop was registered at T0 and T1, and strain analysis was performed off-line by a blind clinician. A general linear model for repeated measures was used to compare the LV-LS variation (T0 to T1) between the two groups. Results From June 2018 to August 2019, 60 patients (PLD+ = 33, PLD- = 27) were consecutively enrolled. The VTI variations after PLR were +21% (±8) in the PLD+ group and -1% (±7) in the PLD- group (pp = 0.12). LV-LS increased in the whole population after PLR +16.0% (±4.0) (p = 0.04). The LV-LS variations after PLR were +19.0% (±31) (p = 0.05) in the PLD+ group and +11.0% (±38) (p = 0.25) in the PLD- group, with no significant difference between the two groups (p = 0.08). The area under the curve for the LV-LS variations between T0 and T1 was 0.63 [0.48–0.77]. Conclusion Our study confirms that LV-LS is load-dependent; however, the variations in LV-LS after PLR is not a discriminating criterion to predict fluid responsiveness of ICU patients with ACF in this cohort.

BackgroundOptimal management of severe trauma patients with active hemorrhage relies on adequate initial resuscitation. Early administration of coagulation factors improves post-traumatic coagulation disorders, and four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC) might be useful in this context. Our main hypothesis is that four-factor PCC in addition to a massive transfusion protocol decreases blood product consumption at day 1 in severe trauma patients with major bleeding.MethodsThis is a prospective, randomized, multicenter, double-blind, parallel, controlled superiority trial. Eligible patients are trauma patients with major bleeding admitted to a French level-I trauma center. Patients randomized in the treatment arm receive 1 mL/kg (25 IU/ml of Factor IX/Kg) four-factor PCC within 1-h post-admission while patients randomized in the controlled group receive 1 mL/kg of saline solution 0.9% as a placebo. Treatments are given as soon as possible using syringe pumps (120 mL/h). The primary endpoint is the amount of blood products transfused in the first 24 h post-admission (including red blood cells, frozen fresh plasma, and platelets). The secondary endpoints are the amount of each blood product transfused in the first 24 h, time to achieve prothrombin time ratio < 1.5, time to hemostasis, number of thrombo-embolic events at 28 days, mortality at 24 h and 28 days, number of intensive care unit-free days, number of ventilator-free days, number of hospital-free days within the first 28 days, hospitalization status at day 28, Glasgow outcome scale extended for patients with brain lesions on initial cerebral imaging, and cost of each strategy at days 8 and 28. Inclusions have started in December 2017 and are expected to be complete by June 2021.DiscussionIf PCC reduces total blood consumption at day 1 after severe trauma, this therapy, in adjunction to a classic massive transfusion protocol, may be used empirically on admission in patients at risk of massive transfusion to enhance coagulation. Moreover, this treatment may decrease blood product-related complications and may improve clinical outcomes after post-traumatic hemorrhage.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.govNCT03218722. Registered on July 14, 2017

Hypoxaemia is a potential life-threatening yet common complication in the peri-operative and periprocedural patient (e.g. during an invasive procedure at risk of deterioration of gas exchange, such as bronchoscopy). The European Society of Anaesthesiology (ESA) and the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM) developed guidelines for the use of noninvasive respiratory support techniques in the hypoxaemic patient in the peri-operative and periprocedural period. The panel outlined five clinical questions regarding treatment with noninvasive respiratory support techniques [conventional oxygen therapy (COT), high flow nasal cannula, noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) and continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP)] for hypoxaemic patients with acute peri-operative/periprocedural respiratory failure. The goal was to assess the available literature on the various noninvasive respiratory support techniques, specifically studies that included adult participants with hypoxaemia in the peri-operative/periprocedural period. The literature search strategy was developed by a Cochrane Anaesthesia and Intensive Care trial search specialist in close collaboration with the panel members and the ESA group methodologist. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system was used to assess the level of evidence and to grade recommendations. The final process was then validated by both ESA and ESICM scientific committees. Among 19 recommendations, the two grade 1B recommendations state that: in the peri-operative/periprocedural hypoxaemic patient, the use of either NIPPV or CPAP (based on local expertise) is preferred to COT for improvement of oxygenation; and that the panel suggests using NIPPV or CPAP immediately post-extubation for hypoxaemic patients at risk of developing acute respiratory failure after abdominal surgery. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1007/s00134-020-05948-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

International audience; Background: Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is the most frequent health care-associated infection in severely ill patients, and aspiration of contaminated oropharyngeal content around the cuff of the tracheal tube is the main route of contamination.Research question: Is continuous regulation of tracheal cuff pressure using a pneumatic device superior to manual assessment three times daily using a portable manometer (routine care) in preventing VAP in patients with severe trauma?Study design and methods: In this open-label, randomized controlled superiority trial conducted in 13 French ICUs, adults (age ≥ 18 years) with severe trauma (Injury Severity Score > 15) and requiring invasive mechanical ventilation for ≥ 48 h were enrolled. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) via a secure Web-based random number generator in permuted blocks of variable sizes to one of two groups according to the method of tracheal cuff pressure control. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients developing VAP within 28 days following the tracheal intubation, as determined by two assessors masked to group assignment, in the modified intention-to-treat population. This study is closed to new participants.Results: A total of 434 patients were recruited between July 31, 2015, and February 15, 2018, of whom 216 were assigned to the intervention group and 218 to the control group. Seventy-three patients (33.8%) developed at least one episode of VAP within 28 days following the tracheal intubation in the intervention group compared with 64 patients (29.4%) in the control group (adjusted subdistribution hazard ratio, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.76-1.20; P = .71). No serious adverse events related to the use of the pneumatic device were noted.Interpretation: Continuous regulation of cuff pressure of the tracheal tube using a pneumatic device was not superior to routine care in preventing VAP in patients with severe trauma.Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT02534974; URL: www.clinicaltrials.gov.

International audience

In patients with traumatic brain injury, coagulation disorders may both cause bleeding and thrombosis. The addition of risk factors, including invasive devices, probably increases the risk of complications. The benefit of using intravascular cooling device should be balanced by the risk to generate thrombosis. The use of routine ultrasound was associated with an incidental diagnosis of thrombus, accelerating the onset of curative anticoagulation.

Continuous monitoring of tissue perfusion in patients with hemodynamic instability remains challenging because of the lack of tools available. Through using urethral photoplethysmography, the urethral perfusion index (uPI) could allow tissue perfusion monitoring through a modified urinary catheter. The first objective of our study was to evaluate the feasibility and safety of the IKORUS UP (Advanced Perfusion Diagnostics, Villeurbanne, France), a new device in the field. The secondary objectives were to evaluate the performance (duration and signal quality) of the IKORUS UP probe and to assess the uPI variations during hemodynamic events during major abdominal surgery. “STEP UP” was a prospective, multicenter, observational study. The inclusion criteria were age 18 years or older with signed informed consent and admitted to intensive care unit (ICU) with hemodynamic instability or high-risk surgical patient. Thirty patients were included in the study, 26 in the operating room, and four in the ICU. Of these patients, 28 were analyzed. For the primary outcome, six (21%) patients had pain scores assessed at insertion of and 22 (79%) at withdrawal of the catheter. The mean EVA score was 1.5 (IQ 1–2) and 0.7 (IQ 0–1), respectively, with the highest score being 3. One (4%) minor urethral bleeding and one (4%) catheter-associated urinary tract infection were reported. The IKORUS UP probe remained in the urethra for an average of 172 h (IQ40–328). The median signal measurement time was 33 h (IQ 5.2–46). The signal quality was recorded as good or excellent for 99% (IQ 82–100) of the insertion duration. The signal quality index was 93% (IQ 87–96) with a signal-to-noise ratio of 26 (IQ 21–36). We observed clinically relevant variations in the uPI over time during hemodynamic events or therapeutic interventions, with a strong cross-correlation with macrohemodynamic variables in some patients, while others did not display macrohemodynamic changes. The IKORUS UP probe was well tolerated and allowed urethral perfusion monitoring. Clinically relevant changes in tissue perfusion could be recorded during the observational period. Trial Registration: ( www.clinicaltrials.gov NCT03410069) registered January 25, 2018.

International audience; Obstetric intensive care unit (ICU) admissions comprise only a small part of severe maternal morbidity. The incidence rate of both remains relatively unclear due to inconsistent definitions across publications, although this has begun to be addressed. There is a relative paucity of information regarding disease-specific survival following obstetric ICU admission, but outcomes are clearly related to the cause of admission and the quality of care. The ratio between maternal near-miss cases (many of whom are admitted to ICUs) and maternal death may provide insight into the preventability of death. Hemorrhage and pre-eclampsia constitute the leading causes of ICU admission and have relatively low mortality rates, perhaps demonstrating the impact of informed care in managing obstetric critical illness. Obstetric sepsis, heart disease and anesthesia complications should be the focus of future research. The incidence of obstetric sepsis has been increasing in the last decade, with mortality rates remaining relatively high. The incidence of obstetric heart disease is increasing and maternal complications have been attributed to fractionated care of mothers within this category. Anesthesia complications remain a predominant cause of maternal death and likely intensive care admission. Data are lacking regarding the relative proportion of cases per disease that remain treated outside the ICU; and the outcomes of various management strategies. The only study of the health status of survivors of obstetric ICU admission revealed that six months after hospital discharge, one in five women still had a poorer health-related quality of life than those of a reference age-and sex-matched cohort.

Fungi are responsible for around 20% of microbiologically documented infections in intensive care units (ICU). In the last decade, the incidence of invasive fungal infections (IFI), including candidemia, has increased steadily because of increased numbers of both immunocompromised and ICU patients. To improve the outcomes of patients with IFI, intensivists need to be aware of the inherent challenges. This narrative review summarizes the features of routinely used treatments directed against IFI in non-neutropenic ICU patients, which include three classes of antifungals: polyenes, azoles, and echinocandins. ICU patients' pathophysiological changes are responsible for deep changes in the pharmacokinetics of antifungals. Moreover, drug interactions affect the response to antifungal treatments. Consequently, appropriate antifungal dosage is a challenge under these special conditions. Dosages should be based on renal and liver function, and serum concentrations should be monitored. This review summarizes recent guidelines, focusing on bedside management.

Resume Cette revue presente l’organisation generale de la Societe francaise d’anesthesie et de reanimation (SFAR), qui a pour but de promouvoir la securite des patients a travers l’enseignement et la recherche en anesthesie-reanimation.

International audience