Search

Studies published in the last two decades have clearly demonstrated that the nervous system plays a significant role in carcinogenesis, the progression of cancer, and the development of metastases. These studies, combining oncological and neuroscientific approaches, created the basis for the emergence of a new field in oncology research, the so-called "neurobiology of cancer." The concept of the neurobiology of cancer is based on several facts: (a) psychosocial factors influence the incidence and progression of cancer diseases; (b) the nervous system affects DNA mutations and oncogene-related signaling; (c) the nervous system modulates tumor-related immune responses; (d) tumor tissues are innervated; (e) neurotransmitters released from nerves innervating tumor tissues affect tumor growth and metastasis; (f) alterations or modulation of nervous system activity affects the incidence and progression of cancers; (g) tumor tissue affects the nervous system. The aim of this review is to characterize the pillars that create the basis of cancer neurobiology, to describe recent research advances of the nervous system's role in cancer diseases, and to depict potential clinical implications for oncology. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Ivabradine, a selective inhibitor of the sinoatrial pacemaker, is used in clinical practice to reduce heart rate. However, its potential effect on the neuroendocrine stress response has not been investigated. Therefore, we determined the effect of administering ivabradine to rats on cardiovascular parameters and plasma levels of epinephrine, norepinephrine, and corticosterone. Ivabradine was administered intraperitoneally 30 min before exposing animals to either handling, restraint, or immobilization stress. Heart rate and blood pressure were monitored telemetrically. Blood samples were collected before, during, and after stressor exposure to determine the extent of the neuroendocrine stress response as reflected by plasma epinephrine, norepinephrine, and corticosterone levels. In animals pretreated with ivabradine, significantly lower values of heart rate and blood pressure were found during both the baseline period and during exposure to stressors, as well as during the rest period following stressor exposure. Ivabradine also significantly reduced handling-induced epinephrine and norepinephrine release into the bloodstream. However, ivabradine significantly potentiated restraint- and immobilization-induced increases of plasma epinephrine levels, whereas stress-induced changes in plasma norepinephrine and corticosterone levels were ambiguous. Our data shows that ivabradine significantly reduces blood pressure in rats during both baseline and stressful conditions, and also affects the neuroendocrine stress response. These findings show that viscerosensory signaling from the cardiovascular system may significantly modulate the neuroendocrine stress response. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Modern society is characterized by the ubiquity of stressors that affect every individual to different extents. Furthermore, experimental, clinical, and epidemiological data have shown that chronic activation of the stress response may participate in the development of various somatic as well as neuropsychiatric diseases. Surprisingly, the role that stress plays in the etiopathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease (AD) has not yet been studied in detail and is therefore not well understood. However, accumulated data have shown that neuroendocrine and behavioral changes accompanying the stress response affect neuronal homeostasis and compromise several key neuronal processes. Mediators of the neuroendocrine stress response, if elevated repeatedly or chronically, exert direct detrimental effects on the brain by impairing neuronal metabolism, plasticity, and survival. Stress-induced hormonal and behavioral reactions may also participate in the development of hypertension, atherosclerosis, insulin resistance, and other peripheral disturbances that may indirectly induce neuropathological processes participating in the development and progression of AD. Importantly, stress-induced detrimental effects as etiological factors of AD are attractive because they can be reduced by several approaches including behavioral and pharmacological interventions. These interventions may therefore represent an important strategy for prevention or attenuation of the progression of AD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]