Search

Radiologically isolated syndrome (RIS) is the earliest stage in the disease continuum of multiple sclerosis (MS). RIS is discovered incidentally in individuals who are asymptomatic but have typical lesions in the brain and/or spinal cord suggestive of demyelination. The 2009 and revised 2023 RIS criteria were developed for diagnosis. Presymptomatic individuals who fulfill the 2009 RIS criteria by having 3-4 of 4 dissemination in space McDonald 2005 MS criteria are still diagnosed with RIS using the revised 2023 RIS criteria. In presymptomatic individuals who do not fulfill the 2009 RIS criteria, the revised 2023 RIS criteria target to secure an accurate and timely diagnosis: In addition to (a) having one lesion in two of four locations (periventricular, juxtacortical/cortical, infratentorial, spinal cord), (b) two of three features (spinal cord lesion, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF)-restricted oligoclonal bands, and new T2 or gadolinium-enhancing lesion) should be fulfilled. Among laboratory biomarkers, CSF kappa-free light chain can also increase diagnostic accuracy. Once the diagnosis is confirmed, the established risk factors, including demographics, imaging, and laboratory biomarkers, should be evaluated for symptomatic MS transition and prognosis. Younger age, male sex, increased neurofilament-light chain, CSF abnormality, and the presence of infratentorial, spinal cord, or gadolinium-enhancing lesions on imaging are the main risk factors for transition to symptomatic MS. Two randomized clinical trials showed significant efficacy of disease-modifying treatments in delaying or preventing the development of the first clinical event in RIS. However, because some individuals remain as RIS, it is crucial to identify the individuals with a higher number of risk factors to optimize disease outcomes by early intervention while minimizing adverse events. Discussing each RIS case with an expert MS team is recommended because there is still a lack of clinical guidelines to improve care, counseling, and surveillance., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.)

Background: Alexithymia refers to difficulty identifying (DIF) and describing (DDF) feelings and externally oriented thinking (EOT). Its prevalence remains unknown in the radiologically isolated syndrome (RIS), the preclinical multiple sclerosis (MS) phase., Methods: Alexithymia was measured with the Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS-20) in 29 RIS and age and gender-matched healthy controls and relapsing-remitting (RR) MS with an EDSS <3. All participants completed evaluations of cognition (BCCOG-SEP), depression (Fast-BDI), fatigue (EMIF), and quality of life (SEP-59)., Results: The level of alexithymia was significantly different between the three groups, with the higher score in the RRMS group (mean score of 54.5, SD: 12,3) compared to RIS (mean score of 47.2, SD: 14.8) and in healthy controls (mean score of 41.9, SD:12.8). 34 % of RIS participants showed a pathological level of alexithymia. The proportions were 21.7 % in the healthy controls and 51.7 % in the RRMS-matched groups. The difference was mainly significant for the DIF factor, p<.001. No significant correlations were observed between alexithymia and the different measures of cognition. In the RIS group, alexithymia was strongly linked to the levels of depression and cognitive fatigue. Furthermore, alexithymia was related to decreased mental quality of life., Conclusion: The study revealed that one-third of subjects with radiologically isolated syndrome show signs of alexithymia. Interestingly, no cognitive measure was found to be correlated with the level of alexithymia, which is consistent with previous research findings. Alexithymia and mainly difficulty identifying feelings in RIS are associated with depression but also relate to cognitive fatigue and reduced mental quality of life. This could impact the daily interactions of RIS subjects., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest None., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: CLF none. DTO received personal compensation for consulting and advisory services from Biogen, Eisai, EMD Serono, Genentech, Genzyme/Sanofi, Moderna, RVL Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Zenas BioPharma, and research support from EMD Serono/Merck and Novartis. DTO has issued national and international patents and pending patents related to other developed technologies. DTO received royalties for intellectual property licensed by The Board of Regents of The University of Texas System and is also the Founder of Revert Health, Inc.

The radiologically isolated syndrome is defined by the presence of incidentally identified T2-weighted hyperintense lesions, highly suggestive of central nervous system demyelination, following an MRI study that is performed for reasons other than for the investigation of symptoms related to multiple sclerosis (MS). These individuals also have no evidence of prior neurological symptoms associated with inflammatory demyelination and no alternative explanation for the observed MRI findings. Recently, the introduction of novel imaging techniques such as the "central vein sign" has improved lesion specificity for MS. In addition, the observation of T2-fluid attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) mismatch characteristics associated with gliomas and in those with MS with a higher disease burden appear to provide morphological data that relate to disease severity. The value of T2-FLAIR mismatch characteristics in discrete multi-focal lesions has not yet been well defined. Here, we present the value of a fat-suppressed T2-FLAIR sequence in the identification and characterization of T2-weighted hyperintensities resulting from inflammatory demyelination., Competing Interests: D.T.O. received personal compensation for consulting and advisory services from Biogen, Eisai, EMD Serono, Genentech, Genzyme/Sanofi, Moderna, RVL Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Zenas BioPharma, and research support from EMD Serono/Merck and Novartis. D.T.O. has issued national and international patents along with pending patents related to other developed technologies and has received royalties for intellectual property licensed by The Board of Regents of The University of Texas System. D.T.O. is the Founder of Revert Health Inc. C.L.-F. reports no disclosures., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Institute of Radiology.)

Introduction: Rituximab (RTX) has been proven effective in managing refractory generalized myasthenia gravis (MG), and its use is increasing worldwide. MG stabilization may initially require oral corticosteroid (CS) therapy, but its long-term side effects require the shortest duration of treatment. We studied the clinical effectiveness and usefulness of corticosteroids associated with RTX compared to RTX alone on MG remission., Methods: In a monocentric retrospective cohort in the Nice University Hospital, we compared naïve MG patients treated with RTX as first-line therapy alone (G1) or associated with CS (G2). After the RTX induction, we evaluated efficacy with the Osserman score (OS) and the requirement for any rescue therapy (IVIg or plasmapheresis)., Results: Sixty-eight patients were treated with RTX, of which 19 (27.94%) benefited from an association with at least 0.5 mg/kg of corticosteroids. RTX-CS patients were more severe than RTX alone (OS for G1: 74.1 and G2: 64.94, p = 0.044). However, OS at 3 (83.44 and 83.12, p = 0.993), 6 (88.69 and 86.36, p = 0.545), 9 (82.91 and 85.73, p = 0.563), and 12 months (86.6 and 88.69, p = 0.761) from the treatment induction were similar. Rescue therapy following RTX induction was significantly higher for the RTX-CS (20.41% and 47.37%, p = 0.037). Regarding safety, adverse event rates were similar in the two groups (0% and 14.29%, p = 0.178)., Conclusion: We suggest that RTX alone is as effective as RTX-CS in MG patients, indicating that avoiding steroids could reduce side effects, decrease rescue therapies, and not affect MG outcomes., (© 2024. Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Importance: Understanding the association between clinically defined relapses and radiological activity in multiple sclerosis (MS) is essential for patient treatment and therapeutic development., Objective: To investigate clinical events identified as relapses but not associated with new T2 lesions or gadolinium-enhanced T1 lesions on brain and spinal cord magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)., Design, Setting, and Participants: This multicenter observational cohort study was conducted between January 2015 and June 2023. Data were extracted on June 8, 2023, from the French MS registry. All clinical events reported as relapses in patients with relapsing-remitting MS were included if brain and spinal cord MRI was performed within 12 and 24 months before the event, respectively, and 50 days thereafter with gadolinium injection., Exposures: Events were classified as relapses with active MRI (RAM) if a new T2 lesion or gadolinium-enhanced T1 lesion appeared on brain or spinal cord MRI or as acute clinical events with stable MRI (ACES) otherwise., Main Outcomes and Measures: Factors associated with ACES were investigated; patients with ACES and RAM were compared regarding Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) course, relapse rate, confirmed disability accrual (CDA), relapse-associated worsening (RAW), progression independent of relapse activity (PIRA), and transition to secondary progressive (SP) MS, and ACES and RAM rates under each disease-modifying therapy (DMT) were estimated., Results: Among 31 885 clinical events, 637 in 608 patients (493 [77.4%] female; mean [SD] age, 35.8 [10.7] years) were included. ACES accounted for 166 (26.1%) events and were more likely in patients receiving highly effective DMTs, those with longer disease duration (odds ratio [OR], 1.04; 95% CI, 1.01-1.07), or those presenting with fatigue (OR, 2.14; 95% CI, 1.15-3.96). ACES were associated with significant EDSS score increases, lower than those found for RAM. Before the index event, patients with ACES experienced significantly higher rates of relapse (relative rate [RR], 1.21; 95% CI, 1.01-1.46), CDA (hazard ratio [HR], 1.54; 95% CI, 1.13-2.11), and RAW (HR, 1.72; 95% CI, 1.20-2.45). Patients with ACES were at significantly greater risk of SP transition (HR, 2.58; 95% CI, 1.02-6.51). Although RAM rate decreased with DMTs according to their expected efficacy, ACES rate was stable across DMTs., Conclusions and Relevance: The findings in this study introduce the concept of ACES in MS, which accounted for one-fourth of clinical events identified as relapses.

Background: Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and spinal MRIs are often obtained in children with the radiologically isolated syndrome (RIS) for diagnosis and prognosis. Factors affecting the frequency and timing of these tests are unknown., Objective: To determine whether age or sex were associated with (1) having CSF or spinal MRI obtained or (2) the timing of these tests., Methods: We analyzed children (≤ 18 y) with RIS enrolled in an international longitudinal study. Index scans met 2010/2017 multiple sclerosis (MS) MRI criteria for dissemination in space (DIS). We used Fisher's exact test and multivariable logistic regression (covariates = age, sex, MRI date, MRI indication, 2005 MRI DIS criteria met, and race)., Results: We included 103 children with RIS (67% girls, median age = 14.9 y). Children ≥ 12 y were more likely than children < 12 y to have CSF obtained (58% vs. 21%, adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 4.9, p = 0.03). Pre-2017, girls were more likely than boys to have CSF obtained (n = 70, 79% vs. 52%, AOR = 4.6, p = 0.01), but not more recently (n = 30, 75% vs. 80%, AOR = 0.2, p = 0.1; p = 0.004 for interaction). Spinal MRIs were obtained sooner in children ≥ 12 y (median 11d vs. 159d, p = 0.03)., Conclusions: Younger children with RIS may be at continued risk for misdiagnosis and misclassification of MS risk. Consensus guidelines are needed., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany.)

Background: Epidemiological data reveal that 45% of persons with multiple sclerosis (PwMS) in France are more than 50 years. This population more than 50 is more susceptible to cancer, and this risk may be increased by frequent use of immunosuppressive drugs. Consequently, concerns have arisen about the potential increased risk of cancer in PwMS and how patients should be screened and managed in terms of cancer risk., Objective: To develop evidence-based recommendations to manage the coexistence of cancer and multiple sclerosis (MS)., Methods: The French Group for Recommendations in MS collected articles from PubMed and university databases covering the period January 1975 through June 2022. The RAND/UCLA method was employed to achieve formal consensus. MS experts comprehensively reviewed the full-text articles and developed the initial recommendations. A group of multidisciplinary health care specialists then validated the final proposal., Results: Five key questions were addressed, encompassing various topics such as cancer screening before or after initiating a disease-modifying therapy (DMT), appropriate management of MS in the context of cancer, recommended follow-up for cancer in patients receiving a DMT, and the potential reintroduction of a DMT after initial cancer treatment. A strong consensus was reached for all 31 recommendations., Conclusion: These recommendations propose a strategic approach to managing cancer risk in PwMS., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: N. Collongues has received honoraria for consulting or presentation from Alexion, Biogen Idec, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Horizon Therapeutics, Merck Serono, Novartis, Roche, and Sanofi-Genzyme and is a member of the Editorial Board of the Journal de la Ligue Française contre la Sclérose en plaques and the Neurology and Therapy Journal. Françoise Durand-Dubief has received personal compensation for consulting, serving on a scientific advisory board, speaking, or other activities from Biogen, BMS-Celgene, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme, and Teva. Christine Lebrun Frenay has nothing to disclose. Géraldine Androdias has received personal compensation for consulting, serving on a scientific advisory board, speaking, or other activities from Biogen, Merck, Novartis, Roche, and Sanofi-Genzyme. Bertrand Audoin has nothing to disclose. Xavier Ayrignac has received consulting fees and lecturing fess, travel grants, and unconditional research support from Alexion, Biogen, Genzyme, Janssen, Merck Serono, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi Aventis, and Teva Pharma. Caroline Bensa has received consulting honoraria from Alexion, Sanofi, Merck, Biogen, BMS, and Novartis. Kevin Bigaut has received lecturing fees and travel grants from Biogen, Celgene-BMS, Novartis, Roche, and Sanofi-Genzyme. Julie Boucher has nothing to disclose. Bertrand Bourre serves on the scientific advisory board and has received funding for travel and honoraria from Alexion, Biogen, BMS, Horizon, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Sanofi, and Roche. Clemence Boutiere has nothing to disclose. Pierre Branger has received personal compensation for consulting, serving on a scientific advisory board, speaking, or other activities from Alexion, Biogen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck, Novartis, and Sanofi-Genzyme. C. Carra-Dalliere has received travel grants and/or consulting fees from Alexion, Biogen, Merck, Novartis, Roche, and Sanofi-Genzyme. Jonathan Ciron has received personal compensation for consulting, serving on a scientific advisory board, speaking, or other activities from Biogen, Novartis, Merck, Sanofi, Roche, Celgene-BMS, Alexion, and Horizon Therapeutics. Angelique Da Silva has received personal fees from Daichi and Leopharma. Gilles Defer has received personal fees from Biogen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck Serono, Novartis, Sanofi-Genzyme, and Teva Pharmaceuticals. Sarah Demortière has nothing to disclose. Maxime Guillaume has received honoraria from Novartis, Merck, and Sanofi. Benjamin Hebant has nothing to disclose. Edouard Januel has nothing to disclose. Anne Kerbrat has nothing to disclose. Arnaud Kwiatkowski has received personal compensation for consulting, serving on a scientific advisory board, speaking, or other activities from Biogen, Merck Serono, Novartis, Sanofi-Genzyme, Roche, and Teva. Emmanuelle Leray has received personal compensation for consulting, serving on a scientific advisory board, speaking, or other activities with Alexion, Biogen, Merck, Novartis, Roche, and Sanofi-Genzyme. Elisabeth Maillart has received research support from Biogen and personal fees for lectures and serving on advisory boards from Biogen, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi, and Teva. Guillaume Mathey has nothing to disclose. Xavier Moisset has received financial support from Allergan-Abbvie, Biogen, BMS, Grünenthal, Lilly, Lundbeck, Teva, Merck Serono, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, and Sanofi-Genzyme and non-financial support from SOS Oxygène not related to the submitted work. Alexis Montcuquet has received personal compensation for consulting, serving on a scientific advisory board, speaking, or other activities from Alexison, Biogen, Merck Serono, Novartis, Sanofi-Genzyme, Roche, and Teva. Nathalie Morel has nothing to disclose. Romain Marignier has received personal fees from Horizon Therapeutics, Alexion, Roche, and UCB; and nonfinancial support from Horizon Therapeutics, Merck, Biogen, and Roche. Chloe Pierret has nothing to disclose. Julie Pique has received travel grants and personal compensation for consulting, serving on a scientific advisory board, speaking, or other activities from Teva, Biogen, Novartis, Merck, Sanofi-Genzyme, Roche, Celgene-BMS, and Alexion. Julien Poupart has nothing to disclose. Chloe Prunis has nothing to disclose. Eric Thouvenot has received personal fees from Actelion and Teva and grants from Biogen, Merck Serono, Novartis, and Roche. Thomas Roux has received personal compensation for consulting, speaking, or serving on a scientific advisory board from Alexion, Biogen, BMS-Celgene, Merck, Novartis, and Sanofi-Genzyme. Perrine Schmitt has nothing to disclose. Helene Zephir has nothing to disclose. Mikael Cohen has received personal compensation for consulting, serving on a scientific advisory board, speaking, or other activities from Ad Scientiam, Biogen, Merck, Sanofi-Genzyme, Roche, Celgene-BMS, Alexion, and Horizon Therapeutics.

Introduction: Over the past few years, anti-CD20 therapies like rituximab, ocrelizumab or ofatumumab have seen an increase in interest in the treatment of neurological autoimmune disorders such as multiple sclerosis (MS), neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD), or resistant forms of generalized myasthenia gravis (MG). They are generally well-tolerated, but recent reports have highlighted severe dental disorders in patients undergoing anti-CD20 therapies. The aim was to describe a series of cases and to compare with the available scientific literature., Methods: We reviewed 6 patient cases with dental disorders during anti-CD20 therapy that were reported to the pharmacovigilance center. A disproportionality analysis was also conducted on Vigibase® for each anti-CD20 and each adverse effect described in the cases., Results: Six cases of dental and gingival conditions in relatively young patients were reported (median age: 40.5 years old [min: 34; max: 79]). Oral conditions were developed in four patients with MS treated with ocrelizumab and in two patients receiving rituximab (one patient with MG and one with NMOSD). The onset of oral conditions ranged from 10 days to 2 years after treatment initiation. Notably, all patients treated with ocrelizumab experienced gingival recession. Various dental pathologies were observed, including tooth loss, dental pain, caries, brittle teeth, dental fractures, dental abscesses, and periodontitis. Analysis of Vigibase® revealed 284 worldwide cases of dental and gingival conditions under ocrelizumab, 386 cases under rituximab, and 80 under ofatumumab. Significant associations were found between these therapies and dental pathologies, particularly tooth abscesses and infections., Conclusion: To our knowledge, this is the first case series reporting dental conditions developed in patients long-term treated with anti-CD20 treatments. This issue, literature data, and Vigilyze® analysis might be considered a safety signal that necessitates being confirmed with more robust data, such as a retrospective study with a control group. Meanwhile, proactive measures are essential like frequent dental checkups and dental hygienic measures to prevent oral health problems associated with anti-CD20 therapies., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Importance: A recent randomized clinical trial concluded that discontinuing medium-efficacy therapy might be a reasonable option for older patients with nonactive multiple sclerosis (MS), but there is a lack of data on discontinuing high-efficacy therapy (HET). In younger patients, the discontinuation of natalizumab and fingolimod is associated with a risk of rebound of disease activity., Objective: To determine whether discontinuing HET in patients 50 years and older with nonactive MS is associated with an increased risk of relapse compared with continuing HET., Design, Setting, and Participants: This observational cohort study used data from 38 referral centers from the French MS registry (Observatoire Français de la Sclérose en Plaques [OFSEP] database). Among 84704 patients in the database, data were extracted for 1857 patients 50 years and older with relapsing-remitting MS treated by HET and with no relapse or magnetic resonance imaging activity for at least 2 years. After verification of the medical records, 1620 patients were classified as having discontinued HET or having remained taking treatment and were matched 1:1 using a dynamic propensity score (including age, sex, disease phenotype, disability, treatment of interest, and time since last inflammatory activity). Patients were included from February 2008 to November 2021, with a mean (SD) follow-up of 5.1 (2.9) years. Data were extracted in June 2022., Exposures: Natalizumab, fingolimod, rituximab, and ocrelizumab., Main Outcomes and Measures: Time to first relapse., Results: Of 1620 included patients, 1175 (72.5%) were female, and the mean (SD) age was 54.7 (4.8) years. Among the 1452 in the HET continuation group and 168 in the HET discontinuation group, 154 patients in each group were matched using propensity scores (mean [SD] age, 57.7 [5.5] years; mean [SD] delay since the last inflammatory activity, 5.6 [3.8] years; mean [SD] follow-up duration after propensity score matching, 2.5 [2.1] years). Time to first relapse was significantly reduced in the HET discontinuation group compared with the HET continuation group (hazard ratio, 4.1; 95% CI, 2.0-8.5; P < .001) but differed between HETs, with a hazard ratio of 7.2 (95% CI, 2.1-24.5; P = .001) for natalizumab, 4.5 (95% CI, 1.3-15.5; P = .02) for fingolimod, and 1.1 (95% CI, 0.3-4.8; P = .85) for anti-CD20 therapy., Conclusion and Relevance: As in younger patients, in patients 50 years and older with nonactive MS, the risk of relapse increased significantly after stopping HETs that impact immune cell trafficking (natalizumab and fingolimod). There was no significant increase in risk after stopping HETs that deplete B-cells (anti-CD20 therapy). This result may inform decisions about stopping HETs in clinical practice.

Objective: The radiologically isolated syndrome (RIS) represents the earliest detectable preclinical phase of multiple sclerosis (MS). Increasing evidence suggests that the central vein sign (CVS) enhances lesion specificity, allowing for greater MS diagnostic accuracy. This study evaluated the diagnostic performance of the CVS in RIS., Methods: Patients were prospectively recruited in a single tertiary center for MS care. Participants with RIS were included and compared to a control group of sex and age-matched subjects. All participants underwent 3 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging, including postcontrast susceptibility-based sequences, and the presence of CVS was analyzed. Sensitivity and specificity were assessed for different CVS lesion criteria, defined by proportions of lesions positive for CVS (CVS+) or by the absolute number of CVS+ lesions., Results: 180 participants (45 RIS, 45 MS, 90 non-MS) were included, representing 5285 white matter lesions. Among them, 4608 were eligible for the CVS assessment (970 in RIS, 1378 in MS, and 2260 in non-MS). According to independent ROC comparisons, the proportion of CVS+ lesions performed similarly in diagnosing RIS from non-MS than MS from non-MS (p = 0.837). When a 6-lesion CVS+ threshold was applied, RIS lesions could be diagnosed with an accuracy of 87%. MS could be diagnosed with a sensitivity of 98% and a specificity of 83%. Adding OCBs or Kappa index to CVS biomarker increased the specificity to 100% for RIS diagnosis., Interpretation: This study shows evidence that CVS is an effective imaging biomarker in differentiating RIS from non-MS, with similar performances to those in MS., (© 2024 The Authors. Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Neurological Association.)

Background: Epidemiologic studies on coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in patients with multiple sclerosis (pwMS) have focused on the first waves of the pandemic until early 2021., Objectives: We aimed to extend these data from the onset of the pandemic to the global coverage by vaccination in summer 2022., Methods: This retrospective, multicenter observational study analyzed COVISEP registry data on reported COVID-19 cases in pwMS between January 2020 and July 2022. Severe COVID-19 was defined as hospitalization or higher severity., Results: Among 2584 pwMS with confirmed/highly suspected COVID-19, severe infection rates declined from 14.6% preomicron wave to 5.7% during omicron wave ( p  < 0.001). Multivariate analysis identified age (odds ratio (OR) = 1.43, 95% confidence interval (CI) = [1.25-1.64] per 10 years), male sex (OR = 2.01, 95% CI = [1.51-2.67]), obesity (OR = 2.36, 95% CI = [1.52-3.68]), cardiac comorbidities (OR = 2.36, 95% CI = [1.46-3.83]), higher Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) scores (OR = 2.09, 95% CI = [1.43-3.06] for EDSS 3-5.5 and OR = 4.53, 95% CI = [3.04-6.75] for EDSS ⩾6), and anti-CD20 therapies (OR = 2.67, 95% CI = [1.85-3.87]) as risk factors for COVID-19 severity. Vaccinated individuals experienced less severe COVID-19, whether on (risk ratio (RR) = 0.64, 95% CI = [0.60-0.69]) or off (RR = 0.32, 95% CI = [0.30-0.33]) anti-CD20., Discussion: In pwMS, consistent risk factors were anti-CD20 therapies and neurological disability, emerging as vital drivers of COVID-19 severity regardless of wave, period, or vaccination status., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: L.J. reports no disclosure. E.J. reports no disclosure. P.L. reports no disclosure. E.M. has received research support from Fondation ARSEP and Biogen Idec, travel funding and/or consulting fees from Alexion, Biogen Idec, BMS, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme, and Teva. J.D.S. reports no disclosure. H.Z. has no disclosure related to this manuscript. Unrelated to this manuscript H.Z. received consulting fees from Biogen Idec, Sanofi, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Horizon Therpaeutics, Alexion, BMS, and Grant Research Support from ROCHE. J.P. reports no disclosure. P.K. reports no disclosure. D.B. reports no disclosure. O.H. has received consulting and lecture fees from Bayer Schering, Merck, Teva, Genzyme, Novartis, Almirall, and Biogen Idec, travel grants from Novartis, Teva, Genzyme, Merck Serono, and Biogen Idec, and research support from Roche, Merck, and Novartis. L.G. has received consulting and/or lecture fees and/or travel funding from Novartis, Merck, Sanofi, BMS, and Biogen. C.B. has received consulting honoraria from Alexion, Sanofi, Merck, Biogen, BMS, Novartis, Roche, and Teva. M.T. reports receiving consulting and lecture fees from Merck, Novartis, and Biogen Idec, travel grants from Sanofi, Merck Serono, and Biogen Idec. S.V. has received lecturing fees, travel grants, and research support from Biogen, BMS-Celgene, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme, and Teva. O.C. reports receiving personal fees from Biogen, Roche, Merck, Novartis, Janssen, and Sanofi and nonfinancial support from Roche, Merck, and Novartis outside the submitted work. A.M. reports no disclosure. D.L. reports receiving grants from Roche, Sanofi, the ARSEP Foundation, the EDMUS Foundation, and the National Agency of Research and receiving personal fees from Biogen, Novartis, Alexion, Merck, and MSD outside the submitted work. E.B. has received honoraria and consulting fees from Alexion, Novartis, Sanofi Aventis, Biogen Idec, Genzyme, Merck, Roche, and Teva. C.L-F. reports no disclosure. B.B. serves on scientific advisory board, has received funding for travel and honoraria from Alexion, Biogen, BMS, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Sanofi, Roche, and Teva. P.B. reports receiving personal fees from Novartis, Biogen, Merck, BMS, Alexion, and Sanofi outside the submitted work. B.S. reports research support from Roche, Sanofi, and Merck and personal fees for lectures or advisory boards from Novartis, Sanofi, Biogen, Janssen, and Merck. P.C. reports receiving personal fees for board participation from Janssen and Novartis and for board participation and travel from Sanofi and Merck outside the submitted work. E.T. reports receiving personal fees from Biogen, BMS, Janssen, Horizon, Merck, Novartis, and Sanofi outside the submitted work. E.M. reports no disclosure. T.M. reports receiving travel grants and fees for advisory boards from Biogen, Roche, Novartis, Sanofi, and Teva outside the submitted work. F.S. reports receiving consulting and/or lecture fees and/or travel funding from Novartis-Pharma, Biogen, Roche, Sanofi, Linde, and LVL. M.Z. reports receiving expert testimony from Alexion and Novartis, and travel grants from Merck, Roche, and Sanofi Aventis France. C.P. reports receiving honoraria and consulting fees from Alexion, Biogen, Merck, Horizon, and Roche outside the submitted work and serving as president of the Francophone Multiple Sclerosis Society from 2021 to 2024. C.L. has received consulting or travel fees from Biogen, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi, Teva, and Merck Serono, and research grant from Biogen.

Objectives: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are increasingly used in cancer treatment. Their mechanism of action raises the question of possible exacerbation of preexisting multiple sclerosis (MS). The aim of our study was to assess the risk of increased MS activity, defined by the occurrence of a relapse and/or a new MRI lesion, after ICI initiation., Methods: This French multicentric study collected retrospective and prospective data on patients with MS treated with ICIs after a cancer diagnosis., Results: We identified 18 patients with a median age of 48 years. Three of them (17%), all aged 50 years or younger, with a relapsing-remitting course, showed clinical and/or radiologic signs of MS activity 3 to 6 months after ICI initiation. They had stopped disease-modifying treatment (DMT) several months earlier, at the time of cancer diagnosis. Only one had both clinical and MRI activity, with mild severity and complete recovery., Discussion: Our study suggests that the overall risk of MS activity under ICI is low and could be mainly driven by DMT discontinuation, as in MS in general. Although larger studies are needed for better risk assessment in younger patients with more active disease, ICI should be considered when needed in patients with MS.

Importance: Moderately effective therapies (METs) have been the main treatment in pediatric-onset multiple sclerosis (POMS) for years. Despite the expanding use of highly effective therapies (HETs), treatment strategies for POMS still lack consensus., Objective: To assess the real-world association of HET as an index treatment compared with MET with disease activity., Design, Setting, and Participants: This was a retrospective cohort study conducted from January 1, 2010, to December 8, 2022, until the last recorded visit. The median follow-up was 5.8 years. A total of 36 French MS centers participated in the Observatoire Français de la Sclérose en Plaques (OFSEP) cohort. Of the total participants in OFSEP, only treatment-naive children with relapsing-remitting POMS who received a first HET or MET before adulthood and at least 1 follow-up clinical visit were included in the study. All eligible participants were included in the study, and none declined to participate., Exposure: HET or MET at treatment initiation., Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the time to first relapse after treatment. Secondary outcomes were annualized relapse rate (ARR), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) activity, time to Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) progression, tertiary education attainment, and treatment safety/tolerability. An adapted statistical method was used to model the logarithm of event rate by penalized splines of time, allowing adjustment for effects of covariates that is sensitive to nonlinearity and interactions., Results: Of the 3841 children (5.2% of 74 367 total participants in OFSEP), 530 patients (mean [SD] age, 16.0 [1.8] years; 364 female [68.7%]) were included in the study. In study patients, both treatment strategies were associated with a reduced risk of first relapse within the first 2 years. HET dampened disease activity with a 54% reduction in first relapse risk (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 0.46; 95% CI, 0.31-0.67; P < .001) sustained over 5 years, confirmed on MRI activity (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 0.34; 95% CI, 0.18-0.66; P = .001), and with a better tolerability pattern than MET. The risk of discontinuation at 2 years was 6 times higher with MET (HR, 5.97; 95% CI, 2.92-12.20). The primary reasons for treatment discontinuation were lack of efficacy and intolerance. Index treatment was not associated with EDSS progression or tertiary education attainment (adjusted OR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.24-1.10; P = .09)., Conclusions and Relevance: Results of this cohort study suggest that compared with MET, initial HET in POMS was associated with a reduction in the risk of first relapse with an optimal outcome within the first 2 years and was associated with a lower rate of treatment switching and a better midterm tolerance in children. These findings suggest prioritizing initial HET in POMS, although long-term safety studies are needed.

Background: Counseling on pregnancy is still challenging, particularly regarding the use of disease-modifying treatments (DMTs). We are lacking long-term outcomes in children exposed to DMTs., Objectives: This study aimed to set up a French pregnancy registry for women with multiple sclerosis (MS) and related disorders nested within the Observatoire Français de la Sclérose en Plaques (OFSEP) cohort., Methods: Prospective, observational, multicentric, epidemiological study in France. Neurological visits are organized according to routine practice. Data are collected on the OFSEP minimal datasheet. Auto-questionnaires on pregnancy are completed by patients at Months 5-6 and 8 during pregnancy, and Months 3, 6, and 12 postpartum. A specific survey on analgesia is completed by anesthesiologists. Pediatric data are collected from the child's health book, where visits on Day 8, Month 9, and 24 are mandatory. Parents complete neurodevelopmental questionnaires at Year 1, Years 2 and 6., Results: The RESPONSE study started in August 2019. On 7 April 2023, 515 women were included. Baseline demographics are presented., Conclusions: RESPONSE will provide rich information on the global management of pregnancy in France and prospective data on children until the age of 6 years, exposed or not to a DMT, including data on neurodevelopment that can be compared to the general population., Study Funding: EDMUS and ARSEP Foundation, Biogen, Roche., Competing Interests: Declaration of conflicting interestsThe author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: S.V. has received consulting and lecturing fees, travel grants, and unconditional research support from Biogen, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sandoz, and Sanofi. B.B. has received consulting and lecturing fees, travel grants, and unconditional research support from Alexion, Biogen, Horizon, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sandoz, and Sanofi. R.C. has no financial disclosure to declare. K.D. has received consulting and lecturing fees, travel grants, and consulting fees for advisory boards from Alexion, Biogen, Horizon, Novartis, Roche, and Sanofi. A.M.G. has received personal compensation for consulting, serving on a scientific advisory board, speaking, or other activities with Biogen, Novartis, Merck, Sanofi, and Roche. F.R. and C.L.F. have no financial disclosure to declare. E.L. has received consulting and lecturing fees, and travel grants from Alexion, Merck, Novartis, Roche, and Sanofi. L.B. and C.G. have no financial disclosure to declare. R.M. has received personal fees from Horizon Therapeutics, Alexion, Roche, and UCB and non-financial support from Horizon Therapeutics, Merck, Biogen, and Roche, outside the submitted work. E.M. reports research support from Biogen and ARSEP foundation and personal fees for lectures and advisory boards from Biogen, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi, and Teva.

Background and Objectives: Determining whether multiple sclerosis (MS) causes death is challenging. Our objective was to contrast 2 frameworks to estimate probabilities of death attributed to MS (P MS ) and other causes (P other ): the cause-specific framework (CSF), which requires the causes of death, and the excess mortality framework (EMF), which does not., Methods: We used data from the Observatoire Français de la Sclérose en Plaques (OFSEP, n = 37,524) and from a comparative subset where causes of death were available (4,004 women with relapsing-onset MS [R-MS]). In CSF, the probabilities were estimated using the Aalen-Johansen method. In EMF, they were estimated from the excess mortality hazard, which is the additional mortality among patients with MS as compared with the expected mortality in the matched general population. P MS values were estimated at 30 years of follow-up, (1) with both frameworks in the comparative subset, by age group at onset, and (2) with EMF only in the OFSEP population, by initial phenotype, sex, and age at onset., Results: In the comparative subset, the estimated 30-year P MS values were greater using EMF than CSF: 10.9% (95% CI 8.3-13.6) vs 8.7% (6.4-11.8) among the youngest and 20.4% (11.3-29.5) vs 16.2% (8.7-30.2) for the oldest groups, respectively. In the CSF, probabilities of death from unknown causes ranged from 1.5% (0.7-3.0) to 6.4% (2.5-16.4), and even after their reallocation, P MS values remained lower with CSF than with EMF. The estimated probabilities of being alive were close using the 2 frameworks, and the estimated P Other (EMF vs CSF) was 2.6% (2.5-2.6) vs 2.1% (1.2-3.9) and 18.1% (16.9-19.3) vs 26.4% (16.5-42.2), respectively, for the youngest and oldest groups. In the OFSEP population, the estimated 30-year P MS values ranged from 7.5% (6.4-8.7) to 24.0% (19.1-28.9) in patients with R-MS and from 25.4% (21.1-29.7) to 36.8% (28.3-45.3) in primary progressive patients, depending on sex and age., Discussion: EMF has the great advantage of not requiring death certificates, their quality being less than optimal. Conceptually, it also seems more relevant because it avoids having to state, for each individual, whether death was directly or indirectly caused by MS or whether it would have occurred anyway, which is especially difficult in such chronic diseases.

Individuals can be deemed to have radiologically isolated syndrome (RIS) if they have incidental demyelinating-appearing lesions in their brain or spinal cord that are highly suggestive of multiple sclerosis but their clinical history does not include symptoms consistent with multiple sclerosis. Data from international longitudinal cohorts indicate that around half of people with RIS will develop relapsing or progressive symptoms of multiple sclerosis within 10 years, suggesting that in some individuals, RIS is a presymptomatic stage of multiple sclerosis. Risk factors for progression from RIS to clinical multiple sclerosis include younger age (ie, <35 years), male sex, CSF-restricted oligoclonal bands, spinal cord or infratentorial lesions, and gadolinium-enhancing lesions. Other imaging, biological, genetic, and digital biomarkers that might be of value in identifying individuals who are at the highest risk of developing multiple sclerosis need further investigation. Two 2-year randomised clinical trials showed the efficacy of approved multiple sclerosis immunomodulatory medications in preventing the clinical conversion to multiple sclerosis in some individuals with RIS. If substantiated in longer-term studies, these data have the potential to transform our approach to care for the people with RIS who are at the greatest risk of diagnosis with multiple sclerosis., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests CL-F is the principal investigator of the TERIS study. OK declares no competing interests. AS has received research grants from The Turkish Multiple Sclerosis Society and The Scientific and Technological Research Council Of Turkey and Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa Research Support Funds. He has received consultancy fees from Roche, Merck Serono, Biogen Idec/Gen Pharma of Turkey, Sanofi-Genzyme, Novartis, and Alexion, has received honoraria for lectures from Sanofi-Genzyme, Novartis, Roche, and Teva, and has received registration coverage for attending scientific congresses or symposia from Sanofi-Genzyme and Alexion. CJA receives grant support from the National Multiple Sclerosis Society and the National Institutes of Health (NIH). In the past 3 years, she has received honoraria or consulting fees from Sanofi-Genzyme, Novartis, Genentech, Alexion, EMD Serono, and Horizon Therapeutics for participation on advisory boards and data safety monitoring committees, and honoraria for lectures from the American Academy of Neurology, Spire Learning, Department of Defense, Catamount Education, Projects in Knowledge, and Oregon Health and Science University. NM has received research funding from the NIH (award number K23NS101099), the National Multiple Sclerosis Society, and the Charles H Hood Foundation, and speaker honoraria for MDedge. DP has received consulting honoraria from Roche and Novartis. DTO received personal compensation for consulting and advisory services from Alexion, Biogen, Celgene/Bristol Myers Squibb, EMD Serono, Genentech, Genzyme, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Novartis, Osmotica Pharmaceuticals, RVL Pharmaceuticals, TG Therapeutics, and Viela Bio, and research support from Biogen and Merck Serono. He was also a study protocol author and served as the lead investigator of the ARISE study., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: The Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) is the gold standard for evaluating clinical disability in multiple sclerosis (MS) in daily practice. However, more precise clinical assessment tools are needed. We assessed a new, automated rating of the neurological examination obtained with a mobile application (Quantified Neurological Examination - QNE)., Method: Consecutive MS patients were assessed for EDSS score and QNE application that calculates, from the description of the examination, a global score and subscores (qFSS) corresponding to the EDSS functional system scores (FSS). Brain MRI was analysed to obtain automatic measures of brain atrophy., Results: We performed 200 examinations and included 78 patients in the MRI analysis. The global QNE score was strongly correlated with the EDSS. qFSS was statistically different according to the corresponding FSS for each function, except for the visual FSS. EDSS was predominantly correlated to the pyramidal function of the lower limbs. QNE score and qFSS had at least equivalent correlation to MRI measures than EDSS, particularly regarding the gray matter and cortical volumes., Discussion: We propose an automated method to rate neurological disability in MS. While QNE strongly correlates with EDSS, it may allow a more precise way to monitor the evolution of disability., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest None., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Competing Interests: The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Background and Objectives: To evaluate whether the kappa free light chain index (K-index) can predict the occurrence of new T2-weighted MRI lesions (T2L) and clinical events in clinically isolated syndrome (CIS) and radiologically isolated syndrome (RIS)., Methods: All consecutive patients presenting for the diagnostic workup, including CSF analysis, of clinical and/or MRI suspicion of multiple sclerosis (MS) since May 1, 2018, were evaluated. All patients diagnosed with CIS and RIS with at least 1-year follow-up were included. Clinical events and new T2L were collected during follow-up. The K-index performances in predicting new T2L and a clinical event were evaluated using time-dependent ROC analyses. The time to clinical event or new T2L was estimated using survival analysis according to the binarized K-index using an independent cutoff of 8.9, and the ability of each variable to predict outcomes was compared using the Harrell c-index., Results: One hundred and eighty two patients (146 CIS and 36 RIS, median age 39 [30; 48] y-o, 70% females) were included with a median follow-up of 21 [13, 33] months. One hundred five (58%) patients (85 CIS and 20 RIS) experienced new T2L, and 28 (15%; 21 CIS and 7 RIS) experienced a clinical event. The K-index could predict new T2L over time in CIS (area under the curve [AUC] ranging from 0.86 to 0.96) and in RIS (AUC ranging from 0.84 to 0.54) but also a clinical event in CIS (AUC ranging from 0.75 to 0.87). Compared with oligoclonal bands (OCBs), the K-index had a better sensitivity and a slight lower specificity in predicting new T2L and clinical events in both populations. In the predictive model, the K-index was the variable that best predict new T2L in both CIS and RIS but also clinical events in CIS (c-index ranging from 0.70 to 0.77), better than the other variables, including OCB., Discussion: This study provides evidence that the K-index predicts new T2L in CIS and RIS but also clinical attack in patients with CIS. We suggest adding the K-index in the further MS diagnosis criteria revisions as a dissemination-in-time biomarker., (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Academy of Neurology.)

Background: Vaccination in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) treated with immunosuppressive drugs is highly recommended. Regarding COVID-19 vaccination, no specific concern has been raised., Objectives: We aimed to evaluate if COVID-19 vaccination or infection increased the risk of disease activity, either radiological or clinical, with conversion to MS in a cohort of people with a radiologically isolated syndrome (RIS)., Methods: This multicentric observational study analyzed patients in the RIS Consortium cohort during the pandemic between January 2020 and December 2022. We compared the occurrence of disease activity in patients according to their vaccination status. The same analysis was conducted by comparing patients' history of COVID-19 infection., Results: No difference was found concerning clinical conversion to MS in the vaccinated versus unvaccinated group (6.7% vs 8.5%, p > 0.9). The rate of disease activity was not statistically different (13.6% and 7.4%, respectively, p = 0.54). The clinical conversion rate to MS was not significantly different in patients with a documented COVID-19 infection versus non-infected patients., Conclusion: Our study suggests that COVID-19 infection or immunization in RIS individuals does not increase the risk of disease activity. Our results support that COVID-19 vaccination can be safely proposed and repeated for these subjects.

Introduction: Natalizumab, a therapy for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS), is associated with a risk of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML). Over the last several years, practitioners have used off-label extended interval dosing (EID) of natalizumab to reduce PML risk, despite the absence of a large-scale efficacy evaluation., Methods: We conducted a retrospective, multicenter cohort study among adults with RRMS receiving stable standard interval dosing (SID), defined as a ≥ 12-month consecutive period of ≥ 11 natalizumab infusions/year in France. We compared the 12-month risk difference of remaining relapse-free (primary endpoint) between patients who switched to EID (≤ 9 natalizumab infusions) and those who remained on SID, with a noninferiority margin of - 11%. We used propensity score methods such as inverse probability treatment weighting (IPTW) and 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM). Secondary endpoints were annualized relapse rate, disease progression, and safety., Results: Baseline characteristics were similar between patients receiving EID (n = 147) and SID (n = 156). The proportion of relapse-free patients 12 months postbaseline was 142/147 in the EID (96.6%) and 144/156 in the SID group (92.3%); risk difference (95% CI) 4.3% (- 1.3 to 9.8%); p < 0.001 for non-inferiority. There were no significant differences between relapse rates (0.043 vs. 0.083 per year, respectively; p = 0.14) or Expanded Disability Status Scale mean scores (2.43 vs. 2.72, respectively; p = 0.18); anti-JC virus index values were similar (p = 0.23); and no instances of PML were reported. The comparisons using IPTW (n = 306) and PSM (n = 204) were consistent., Conclusion: These results support the pertinence of using an EID strategy for RRMS patients treated with natalizumab., Clinical Trials: gov identifier (NCT04580381)., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Background and Objectives: The question of the long-term safety of pregnancy is a major concern in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS), but its study is biased by reverse causation (women with higher disability are less likely to experience pregnancy). Using a causal inference approach, we aimed to estimate the unbiased long-term effects of pregnancy on disability and relapse risk in patients with MS and secondarily the short-term effects (during the perpartum and postpartum years) and delayed effects (occurring beyond 1 year after delivery)., Methods: We conducted an observational cohort study with data from patients with MS followed in the Observatoire Français de la Sclérose en Plaques registry between 1990 and 2020. We included female patients with MS aged 18-45 years at MS onset, clinically followed up for more than 2 years, and with ≥3 Expanded Disease Status Scale (EDSS) measurements. Outcomes were the mean EDSS score at the end of follow-up and the annual probability of relapse during follow-up. Counterfactual outcomes were predicted using the longitudinal targeted maximum likelihood estimator in the entire study population. The patients exposed to at least 1 pregnancy during their follow-up were compared with the counterfactual situation in which, contrary to what was observed, they would not have been exposed to any pregnancy. Short-term and delayed effects were analyzed from the first pregnancy of early-exposed patients (who experienced it during their first 3 years of follow-up)., Results: We included 9,100 patients, with a median follow-up duration of 7.8 years, of whom 2,125 (23.4%) patients were exposed to at least 1 pregnancy. Pregnancy had no significant long-term causal effect on the mean EDSS score at 9 years (causal mean difference [95% CI] = 0.00 [-0.16 to 0.15]) or on the annual probability of relapse (causal risk ratio [95% CI] = 0.95 [0.93-1.38]). For the 1,253 early-exposed patients, pregnancy significantly decreased the probability of relapse during the perpartum year and significantly increased it during the postpartum year, but no significant delayed effect was found on the EDSS and relapse rate., Discussion: Using a causal inference approach, we found no evidence of significantly deleterious or beneficial long-term effects of pregnancy on disability. The beneficial effects found in other studies were probably related to a reverse causation bias., (© 2022 American Academy of Neurology.)

Background and Objectives: Ocrelizumab (OCR), a humanized anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody, is highly efficient in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RR-MS). We assessed early cellular immune profiles and their association with disease activity at treatment start and under therapy, which may provide new clues on the mechanisms of action of OCR and on the disease pathophysiology., Methods: A first group of 42 patients with an early RR-MS, never exposed to disease-modifying therapy, was included in 11 centers participating to an ancillary study of the ENSEMBLE trial (NCT03085810) to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of OCR. The phenotypic immune profile was comprehensively assessed by multiparametric spectral flow cytometry at baseline and after 24 and 48 weeks of OCR treatment on cryopreserved peripheral blood mononuclear cells and analyzed in relation to disease clinical activity. A second group of 13 untreated patients with RR-MS was included for comparative analysis of peripheral blood and CSF. The transcriptomic profile was assessed by single-cell qPCRs of 96 genes of immunologic interest., Results: Using an unbiased analysis, we found that OCR as an effect on 4 clusters of CD4 + T cells: one corresponding to naive CD4 + T cells was increased, the other clusters corresponded to effector memory (EM) CD4 + CCR6 - T cells expressing homing and migration markers, 2 of them also expressing CCR5 and were decreased by the treatment. Of interest, one CD8 + T-cell cluster was decreased by OCR corresponding to EM CCR5-expressing T cells with high expression of the brain homing markers CD49d and CD11a and correlated with the time elapsed since the last relapse. These EM CD8 + CCR5 + T cells were enriched in the CSF of patients with RR-MS and corresponded to activated and cytotoxic cells., Discussion: Our study provides novel insights into the mode of action of anti-CD20, pointing toward the role of EM T cells, particularly a subset of CD8 T cells expressing CCR5., (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Academy of Neurology.)

Background: In relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS), early identification of suboptimal responders can prevent disability progression., Objective: We aimed to develop and validate a dynamic score to guide the early decision to switch from first- to second-line therapy., Methods: Using time-dependent propensity scores (PS) from a French cohort of 12,823 patients with RRMS, we constructed one training and two validation PS-matched cohorts to compare the switched patients to second-line treatment and the maintained patients. We used a frailty Cox model for predicting individual hazard ratios (iHRs)., Results: From the validation PS-matched cohort of 348 independent patients with iHR ⩽ 0.69, we reported the 5-year relapse-free survival at 0.14 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.09-0.22) for the waiting group and 0.40 (95% CI 0.32-0.51) for the switched group. From the validation PS-matched cohort of 518 independent patients with iHR > 0.69, these values were 0.37 (95% CI 0.30-0.46) and 0.44 (95% CI 0.37-0.52), respectively., Conclusions: By using the proposed dynamic score, we estimated that at least one-third of patients could benefit from an earlier switch to prevent relapse.

Introduction: S1P 1 receptor modulators (S1P 1 -RM) are oral disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) for multiple sclerosis (MS). Several authorities have raised doubts that S1P 1 -RM are responsible for an increased risk of melanoma in patients with MS. We studied the in vitro effects of S1P 1 -RM on different melanoma cell lines to compare the effect of available S1P 1 -RM on the proliferation of human melanoma cells., Methods: Four S1P 1 -RM were studied which are currently approved for managing MS, namely fingolimod (Gilenya ® ), siponimod (Mayzent ® ), ozanimod (Zeposia ® ), and ponesimod (Ponvory ® ). We tested these four drugs at different concentrations, including therapeutic doses (0.5, 1.6, 5.5, 18, and 60 µM), on human melanoma cell lines (501Mel cells, 1205LU cells, and M249R cells) to analyze in vitro cell proliferation monitored with the IncuCyte ZOOM live cell microscope (Essen Bioscience)., Results: At therapeutic doses, median confluence increased overall for all lineages: + 122% for ozanimod (p < 0.001), + 71% for ponesimod (p < 0.001), + 67% for siponimod (NS), and + 41% for fingolimod (p = 0.094). Ozanimod- and ponesimod-treated cells increased confluency in 501Mel, 1205LU, and M249R cell lines (p < 0.001)., Conclusion: These data suggest an increased proliferation of various melanoma cell lines with S1P 1 -RM treatments used at therapeutic concentrations for patients with MS and should raise the question of increased dermatologic surveillance., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Objective: The objective of this study was to develop evidence-based recommendations on pregnancy management for persons with multiple sclerosis (MS)., Background: MS typically affects young women in their childbearing years. Increasing evidence is available to inform questions raised by MS patients and health professionals about pregnancy issues., Methods: The French Group for Recommendations in Multiple Sclerosis (France4MS) reviewed PubMed and university databases (January 1975 through June 2021). The RAND/UCLA appropriateness method was developed to synthesise the scientific literature and expert opinions on healthcare topics; it was used to reach a formal agreement. Fifty-six MS experts worked on the full-text review and initial wording of recommendations. A group of 62 multidisciplinary healthcare specialists validated the final proposal of summarised evidence., Results: A strong agreement was reached for all 104 proposed recommendations. They cover diverse topics, such as pregnancy planning, follow-up during pregnancy and postpartum, delivery routes, locoregional analgesia or anaesthesia, prevention of postpartum relapses, breastfeeding, vaccinations, reproductive assistance, management of relapses and disease-modifying treatments., Conclusion: The 2022 recommendations of the French MS society should be helpful to harmonise counselling and treatment practice for pregnancy in persons with MS, allowing for better and individualised choices.

Background: In 2020, the French Multiple Sclerosis (MS) Society (SFSEP) decided to develop a national evidence-based consensus on pregnancy in MS. As neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD) shares a series of commonalities with MS, but also some significant differences, specific recommendations had to be developed., Objectives: To establish recommendations on pregnancy in women with NMOSD., Methods: The French Group for Recommendations in Multiple Sclerosis (France4MS) reviewed PubMed and universities databases (January 1975 through June 2021). The RAND/UCLA appropriateness method, which was developed to synthesise the scientific literature and expert opinions on health care topics, was used to reach a formal agreement. Fifty-six MS experts worked on the full-text review and initial wording of recommendations. A sub-group of nine NMOSD experts was dedicated to analysing available data on NMOSD. A group of 62 multidisciplinary healthcare specialists validated the final proposal of summarised evidence., Results: A strong agreement was reached for all 66 proposed recommendations. They cover diverse topics, such as pregnancy planning, follow-up during pregnancy and postpartum, delivery routes, loco-regional analgesia or anaesthesia, prevention of postpartum relapses, breastfeeding, vaccinations, reproductive assistance, management of relapses, and disease-modifying treatments., Conclusion: Physicians and patients should be aware of the new and specific evidence-based recommendations of the French MS Society for pregnancy in women with NMOSD. They should help harmonise counselling and treatment practise, allowing for better individualised choices.

Background: Facial emotion recognition (FER) may be impaired in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). Nevertheless, the literature is heterogeneous, with studies not highlighting this kind of impairment. Moreover, most studies have not explored differences between MS spectrum disorders (radiologically isolated syndrome (RIS), clinically-isolated syndrome (CIS), relapsing-remitting (RRMS), and progressive (primary - (PPMS) and secondary - (SPMS)). One hypothesis would be that FER impairment results from an alteration of eye-gaze strategies while observing emotional faces. Consequently, a FER deficit would be found in MS patients for whom these observation strategies would be disturbed and more frequent in the progressive forms., Methods: We prospectively enroled 52 patients (10 RIS, 10 CIS, 12RRMS, 10 SPMS, 10 PPMS) and 23 healthy controls (HC) to assess FER using Ekman Faces Test. Eye movements (number and duration of fixations) were recorded with an eye-tracking device., Results: 21% of the MS participants had significant FER impairment. This impairment was observed in all phenotypes. In progressive forms, FER impairment was more frequent, more severe, and associated with modified emotional face observation strategies. MS participants with significant FER impairment had significantly more modification of eye-gaze strategies during observation of expressive faces than MS participants without FER impairment., Conclusion: FER impairment seems to be linked to a deficit of attention orientation in MS. Remediation of eye-gaze strategies during observation of emotional faces could be beneficial, as observed in other neurological diseases., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest None., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: In Multiple Sclerosis (MS) women, therapeutic management for pregnancy planning and during pregnancy still represents a challenge regarding timing of disease-modifying therapies (DMT) stop, risk of disease reactivation and potential fetal toxicity. The objective of this study was to describe disease activity during pregnancy and postpartum depending on treatment status before conception in women with MS., Methods: 339 MS patients who have achieved a pregnancy between 2007 and 2017 were included. Women were classified according to their exposure to DMT in the 18 months period prior to pregnancy (untreated / first- / second/third-line treatment)., Results: 122 women were not exposed to DMT prior to conception, whereas 147 were exposed to first-line DMT and 70 to second/third line DMT (73% to natalizumab and 23% to fingolimod) before conception. In the first-line group, the ARR decreased from 0.39 during the year before conception to 0.21 during pregnancy, whereas it increased in the second/third-line group from 0.59 to 0.78. 47.1% of the second/third-line group faced at least one relapse during pregnancy and the time from conception to first relapse was significantly shorter in this group (p < 10 -4 ). The risk of relapse during pregnancy and postpartum was associated with occurrence of pre-conception relapses and second/third line DMT exposure before pregnancy., Conclusion: Careful consideration should be given to natalizumab and fingolimod exposed patients before conception as they are at higher risk of reactivation of MS during pregnancy., (Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Background and Objectives: Kappa free light chains (KFLC) seem to efficiently diagnose MS. However, extensive cohort studies are lacking to establish consensus cut-offs, notably to rule out non-MS autoimmune CNS disorders. Our objectives were to (1) determine diagnostic performances of CSF KFLC, KFLC index, and KFLC intrathecal fraction (IF) threshold values that allow us to separate MS from different CNS disorder control populations and compare them with oligoclonal bands' (OCB) performances and (2) to identify independent factors associated with KFLC quantification in MS., Methods: We conducted a retrospective multicenter study involving 13 French MS centers. Patients were included if they had a noninfectious and nontumoral CNS disorder, eligible data concerning CSF and serum KFLC, albumin, and OCB. Patients were classified into 4 groups according to their diagnosis: MS, clinically isolated syndrome (CIS), other inflammatory CNS disorders (OIND), and noninflammatory CNS disorder controls (NINDC)., Results: One thousand six hundred twenty-one patients were analyzed (675 MS, 90 CIS, 297 OIND, and 559 NINDC). KFLC index and KFLC IF had similar performances in diagnosing MS from nonselected controls and OIND ( p = 0.123 and p = 0.991 for area under the curve [AUC] comparisons) and performed better than CSF KFLC ( p < 0.001 for all AUC comparisons). A KFLC index of 8.92 best separated MS/CIS from the entire nonselected control population, with better performances than OCB ( p < 0.001 for AUC comparison). A KFLC index of 11.56 best separated MS from OIND, with similar performances than OCB ( p = 0.065). In the multivariate analysis model, female gender ( p = 0.003), young age ( p = 0.013), and evidence of disease activity ( p < 0.001) were independent factors associated with high KFLC index values in patients with MS, whereas MS phenotype, immune-modifying treatment use at sampling, and the FLC analyzer type did not influence KFLC index., Discussion: KFLC biomarkers are efficient tools to separate patients with MS from controls, even when compared with other patients with CNS autoimmune disorder. Given these results, we suggest using KFLC index or KFLC IF as a criterion to diagnose MS., Classification of Evidence: This study provides Class III evidence that KFLC index or IF can be used to differentiate patients with MS from nonselected controls and from patients with other autoimmune CNS disorders., (Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Academy of Neurology.)

Background and Objectives: To evaluate the rate of return of disease activity after cessation of multiple sclerosis (MS) disease-modifying therapy., Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study from 2 large observational MS registries: MSBase and OFSEP. Patients with relapsing-remitting MS who had ceased a disease-modifying therapy and were followed up for the subsequent 12 months were included in the analysis. The primary study outcome was annualized relapse rate in the 12 months after disease-modifying therapy discontinuation stratified by patients who did, and did not, commence a subsequent therapy. The secondary endpoint was the predictors of first relapse and disability accumulation after treatment discontinuation., Results: A total of 14,213 patients, with 18,029 eligible treatment discontinuation epochs, were identified for 7 therapies. Annualized rates of relapse (ARRs) started to increase 2 months after natalizumab cessation (month 2-4 ARR 0.47, 95% CI 0.43-0.51). Commencement of a subsequent therapy within 2-4 months reduced the magnitude of disease reactivation (mean ARR difference: 0.15, 0.08-0.22). After discontinuation of fingolimod, rates of relapse increased overall (month 1-2 ARR: 0.80, 0.70-0.89) and stabilized faster in patients who started a new therapy within 1-2 months (mean ARR difference: 0.14, -0.01 to 0.29). The magnitude of disease reactivation for other therapies was low but reduced further by commencement of another treatment 1-10 months after treatment discontinuation. Predictors of relapse were a higher relapse rate in the year before cessation, female sex, younger age, and higher EDSS score. Commencement of a subsequent therapy reduced both the risk of relapse (HR 0.76, 95% CI 0.72-0.81) and disability accumulation (0.73, 0.65-0.80)., Discussion: The rate of disease reactivation after treatment cessation differs among MS treatments, with the peaks of relapse activity ranging from 1 to 10 months in untreated cohorts that discontinued different therapies. These results suggest that untreated intervals should be minimized after stopping antitrafficking therapies (natalizumab and fingolimod)., Classification of Evidence: This study provides Class III that disease reactivation occurs within months of discontinuation of MS disease-modifying therapies. The risk of disease activity is reduced by commencement of a subsequent therapy., (© 2022 American Academy of Neurology.)

Background and Objectives: To evaluate the predictive value of serum neurofilament light chain (sNfL) and CSF NfL (cNfL) in patients with radiologically isolated syndrome (RIS) for evidence of disease activity (EDA) and clinical conversion (CC)., Methods: sNfL and cNfL were measured at RIS diagnosis by single-molecule array (Simoa). The risk of EDA and CC according to sNfL and cNfL was evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier analysis and multivariate Cox regression models including age, spinal cord (SC) or infratentorial lesions, oligoclonal bands, CSF chitinase 3-like protein 1, and CSF white blood cells., Results: Sixty-one patients with RIS were included. At diagnosis, sNfL and cNfL were correlated (Spearman r = 0.78, p < 0.001). During follow-up, 47 patients with RIS showed EDA and 36 patients showed CC (median time 12.6 months, 1-86). When compared with low levels, medium and high cNfL (>260 pg/mL) and sNfL (>5.0 pg/mL) levels were predictive of EDA (log rank, p < 0.01 and p = 0.02, respectively). Medium-high cNfL levels were predictive of CC (log rank, p < 0.01). In Cox regression models, cNfL and sNfL were independent factors of EDA, while SC lesions, cNfL, and sNfL were independent factors of CC., Discussion: cNfL >260 pg/mL and sNfL >5.0 pg/mL at diagnosis are independent predictive factors of EDA and CC in RIS. Although cNfL predicts disease activity better, sNfL is more accessible than cNfL and can be considered when a lumbar puncture is not performed., Classification of Evidence: This study provides Class II evidence that in people with radiologic isolated syndrome (RIS), initial serum and CSF NfL levels are associated with subsequent evidence of disease activity or clinical conversion., (Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Academy of Neurology.)

Background: No specific treatment has demonstrated its effectiveness to prevent post-partum relapses for multiple sclerosis (MS) women., Objective: To assess the effectiveness of preventive high-dose corticosteroids in the post-partum period by comparing two strategies: (1) no preventive treatment and (2) standardized preventive treatment., Methods: We selected five French Multiple Sclerosis centers using the same post-partum strategy for their patients-either high-dose steroids (treating centers TC) or no treatment (non-treating centers NTC). We included relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis women who delivered between January 2007 and January 2017. Our primary outcomes were the time from delivery to first relapse, EDSS progression and MRI activity between patients of treating centers and non-treating centers, after propensity-score weighting., Results: 350 patients were included (116 from treating centers, 234 from non-treating centers). For both groups, the annualized relapse rate decreased during pregnancy (0.28 in treating centers and 0.34 in non-treating centers during the third trimester) and increased during the first post-partum trimester (0.45 and 0.69, respectively) with 11% and 14% (NS) of patients facing at least one relapse, respectively. Our primary outcomes were not statistically different between both groups., Conclusion: This study provides class III evidence that systematic high-dose corticosteroids are not associated with a reduced inflammatory activity during the post-partum period in multiple sclerosis patients., (© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany.)

A prodrome is an early set of signs or symptoms that indicate the onset of a disease before more typical symptoms develop. Prodromal stages are well recognized in some neurological and immune-mediated diseases such as Parkinson disease, schizophrenia, type 1 diabetes mellitus and rheumatoid arthritis. Emerging evidence indicates that a prodromal stage exists in multiple sclerosis (MS), raising the possibility of intervention at this stage to delay or prevent the development of classical MS. However, much remains unclear about the prodromal stage of MS and considerable research is needed to fully characterize the prodrome and develop standardized criteria to reliably identify individuals with prodromal MS who are at high risk of progressing to a diagnosis of MS. In this Roadmap, we draw on work in other diseases to propose a disease framework for MS that incorporates the prodromal stage, and set out key steps and considerations needed in future research to fully characterize the MS prodrome, identify early disease markers and develop standardized criteria that will enable reliable identification of individuals with prodromal MS, thereby facilitating trials of interventions to slow or stop progression beyond the prodrome., (© 2022. Springer Nature Limited.)

Background: Video-oculography (VOG) could be useful for monitoring neurodegenerative diseases and multiple sclerosis (MS), as a high prevalence of subclinical eye movements abnormalities (EMA) has been previously reported, with a potential prognostic value regarding disease evolution. However, access to VOG is limited in clinical practice., Objective: To evaluate the reliability of VOG recordings performed using eVOG, a mobile application developed on an iPad., Method: Patients with MS or related disease without clinically detectable EMA were enrolled in a cross-sectional study during which two VOG exams (classical VOG and eVOG) were performed on the same day. We examined reflex saccades, antisaccades, smooth pursuit and fixation. The total number of deficits, saccadic latencies and velocities, qualitative smooth pursuit were compared., Results: 30 patients were included. The mean number of EMA per patient on classical VOG was 4.1 and 2.3 on eVOG. We found a statistical association between the number of EMA for each exam (r = 0.66, p < 0.0001). Saccades latencies (r = 0.57, p < 0.0001) and velocities (r = 0.45, p < 0.0001) were also well correlated. Assessing eVOG accuracy, we found a sensitivity ranging from 44% to 100% and a specificity ranging from 71% to 88.9% depending on the considered abnormality., Conclusion: eVOG could be an easily accessible solution to screen MS patients for the presence of EMA. We plan to use eVOG on a larger cohort of patients, in a prospective study to assess the prognostic value of subclinical EMA in MS. We also plan to investigate the use of eVOG in other neurological conditions., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: It is important to confirm the effectiveness and tolerability of disease-modifying treatments for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) in real-world treatment settings. This prospective observational cohort study (VIRGILE) was performed at the request of the French health authorities. The primary objective was to evaluate the effectiveness of fingolimod 0.5 mg in reducing the annualised relapse rate (ARR) in patients with RRMS., Methods: Participating neurologists enrolled all adult patients with RRMS starting fingolimod treatment between 2014 and 2016, who were followed for 3 years. Follow-up consultations took place at the investigator's discretion. The primary outcome measure was the change in ARR at month 24 after fingolimod initiation. Relapses and adverse events were documented at each consultation; disability assessment (EDSS) and magnetic resonance imagery were performed at the investigator's discretion., Results: Of 1055 eligible patients, 633 patients were assessable at month 36; 405 (64.0%) were treated continuously with fingolimod for 3 years. The ARR decreased from 0.92 ± 0.92 at inclusion to 0.31 ± 0.51 at month 24, a significant reduction of 0.58 [95% CI - 0.51 to - 0.65] relapses/year (p < 0.001). Since starting fingolimod, 461 patients (60.9%) remained relapse-free at month 24 and 366 patients (55.5%) at month 36. In multivariate analysis, no previous disease-modifying treatment, number of relapses in the previous year and lower EDSS score at inclusion were associated with a greater on-treatment reduction in ARR. The mean EDSS score remained stable over the course of the study. Sixty-one out of 289 (21.1%) patients presented new radiological signs of disease activity. Treatment-related serious adverse events were lymphopenia (N = 21), bradycardia (N = 19), elevated transaminases (N = 9) and macular oedema (N = 9)., Conclusions: The effectiveness and tolerability of fingolimod in everyday clinical practice are consistent with findings of previous phase III studies. Our study highlights the utility of fingolimod for the long-term management of patients with multiple sclerosis., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Background: Natalizumab and fingolimod are used as high-efficacy treatments in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. Several observational studies comparing these two drugs have shown variable results, using different methods to control treatment indication bias and manage censoring. The objective of this empirical study was to elucidate the impact of methods of causal inference on the results of comparative effectiveness studies., Methods: Data from three observational multiple sclerosis registries (MSBase, the Danish MS Registry and French OFSEP registry) were combined. Four clinical outcomes were studied. Propensity scores were used to match or weigh the compared groups, allowing for estimating average treatment effect for treated or average treatment effect for the entire population. Analyses were conducted both in intention-to-treat and per-protocol frameworks. The impact of the positivity assumption was also assessed., Results: Overall, 5,148 relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis patients were included. In this well-powered sample, the 95% confidence intervals of the estimates overlapped widely. Propensity scores weighting and propensity scores matching procedures led to consistent results. Some differences were observed between average treatment effect for the entire population and average treatment effect for treated estimates. Intention-to-treat analyses were more conservative than per-protocol analyses. The most pronounced irregularities in outcomes and propensity scores were introduced by violation of the positivity assumption., Conclusions: This applied study elucidates the influence of methodological decisions on the results of comparative effectiveness studies of treatments for multiple sclerosis. According to our results, there are no material differences between conclusions obtained with propensity scores matching or propensity scores weighting given that a study is sufficiently powered, models are correctly specified and positivity assumption is fulfilled., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Introduction: Many patients are referred to multiple sclerosis (MS) tertiary centers to manage brain white matter hyperintensities (WMH). Multiple diagnoses can match in such situations, and we lack proper tools to diagnose complex cases., Objective: This study aimed to prospectively analyze and correlate with the final diagnosis, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) interleukin (IL)-1β, soluble IL-2 receptor (CD25), IL-6, IL-10, and kappa free light chains (KFLC) concentrations in patients presenting with brain WMH., Methods: All patients over 18 years addressed to our MS tertiary center for the diagnostic workup of brain WMH were included from June 1, 2020, to June 1, 2021. Patients were separated into three groups-MS and related disorder (MSARD), other inflammatory neurological disorder (OIND), and non-inflammatory neurological disorder (NIND) groups-according to clinical presentation, MRI characteristics, and biological workup., Results: A total of 176 patients (129 women, mean age 45.8 ± 14.7 years) were included. The diagnosis was MSARD ( n = 88), OIND ( n = 35), and NIND ( n = 53). Median CSF KFLC index and KFLC intrathecal fraction (IF) were higher in MSARD than in the OIND and NIND groups; p < 0.001 for all comparisons. CSF CD25 and IL-6 concentrations were higher in the OIND group than in both the MSARD and NIND groups; p < 0.001 for all comparisons. KFLC index could rule in MSARD when compared to NIND (sensitivity, 0.76; specificity, 0.91) or OIND (sensitivity, 0.73; specificity, 0.76). These results were similar to those with oligoclonal bands (sensitivity, 0.59; specificity, 0.98 compared to NIND; sensitivity, 0.59; specificity, 0.88 compared to OIND). In contrast, elevated CSF CD25 and IL-6 could rule out MSARD when compared to OIND (sensitivity, 0.58 and 0.88; specificity, 0.95 and 0.74, respectively)., Discussion: Our results show that, as OCBs, KFLC biomarkers are helpful tools to rule in MSARD, whereas elevated CSF CD25 and IL-6 rule out MSARD. Interestingly, CSF IL-6 concentration could help identify neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder, myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody-associated disease, and central nervous system (CNS) vasculitis. These results need to be confirmed within more extensive and multicentric studies. Still, they sustain that KFLC, CSF CD25, and CSF IL-6 could be reliable biomarkers in brain WMH diagnostic workup for differentiating MSARD from other brain inflammatory MS mimickers., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2022 Levraut, Landes, Mondot, Cohen, Bresch, Brglez, Seitz-Polski and Lebrun-Frenay.)

Background: Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) attacks require an urgent probabilistic anti-inflammatory therapeutic strategy. As inadequately treated attacks result in disability, there is a need to identify the optimal attack-treatment regimen. Our study aimed to identify predictors of outcome after a first attack in patients with an NMOSD presentation and propose the best treatment strategy., Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study on the French national NMOSD registry (NOMADMUS), a nested cohort of the French multiple sclerosis observatory (OFSEP) recruiting patients with NMOSD presentations in France. We studied the first attack for any independent locations of clinical core characteristic of NMOSD, in treatment-naïve patients. The primary outcome was the evolution of the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score at 6 months, stratified in two ways to account for recovery (return to baseline EDSS score) and treatment response (classified as "good" if the EDSS score decreased by ≥ 1 point after a nadir EDSS score ≤ 3, or by ≥ 2 points after a nadir EDSS score > 3). We used ordinal logistic regression to infer statistical associations with the outcome., Results: We included 211 attacks among 183 patients (104 with anti-AQP4 antibodies, 60 with anti-MOG antibodies, and 19 double seronegative). Attack treatment regimens comprised corticosteroids (n = 196), plasma exchanges (PE; n = 72) and intravenous immunoglobulins (n = 6). Complete recovery was reached in 40 attacks (19%) at 6 months. The treatment response was "good" in 134 attacks (63.5%). There was no improvement in EDSS score in 50 attacks (23.7%). MOG-antibody seropositivity and short delays to PE were significantly and independently associated with better recovery and treatment response., Conclusions: We identified two prognostic factors: serostatus (with better outcomes among MOG-Ab-positive patients) and the delay to PE. We, therefore, argue for a more aggressive anti-inflammatory management of the first attacks suggesting an NMOSD presentation, with the early combination of PE with corticosteroids., (© 2022. The Author(s).)