Search

Background: The proper imaging modality for use in the selection of patients for endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) presenting in the late window remains controversial, despite current guidelines advocating the use of advanced imaging in this population. We sought to understand if clinicians with different specialty training differ in their approach to patient selection for EVT in the late time window., Methods: We conducted an international survey of stroke and neurointerventional clinicians between January and May 2022 with questions focusing on imaging and treatment decisions of large vessel occlusion (LVO) patients presenting in the late window. Interventional neurologists, interventional neuroradiologists, and endovascular neurosurgeons were defined as interventionists whereas all other specialties were defined as non-interventionists. The non-interventionist group was defined by all other specialties of the respondents: stroke neurologist, neuroradiologist, emergency medicine physician, trainee (fellows and residents) and others., Results: Of 3000 invited to participate, 1506 (1027 non-interventionists, 478 interventionists, 1 declined to specify) physicians completed the study. Interventionist respondents were more likely to proceed directly to EVT (39.5% vs. 19.5%; p < 0.0001) compared to non-interventionist respondents in patients with favorable ASPECTS (Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score). Despite no difference in access to advanced imaging, interventionists were more likely to prefer CT/CTA alone (34.8% vs. 21.0%) and less likely to prefer CT/CTA/CTP (39.1% vs. 52.4%) for patient selection (p < 0.0001). When faced with uncertainty, non-interventionists were more likely to follow clinical guidelines (45.1% vs. 30.2%) while interventionists were more likely to follow their assessment of evidence (38.7% vs. 27.0%) (p < 0.0001)., Conclusion: Interventionists were less likely to use advanced imaging techniques in selecting LVO patients presenting in the late window and more likely to base their decisions on their assessment of evidence rather than published guidelines. These results reflect gaps between interventionists and non-interventionists reliance on clinical guidelines, the limits of available evidence, and clinician belief in the utility of advanced imaging., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany.)

Background: The Safety and Efficacy of Intensive Blood Pressure Lowering after Successful Endovascular Therapy in Acute Ischaemic Stroke (BP TARGET) trial demonstrated no benefit from intensive systolic blood pressure (SBP) treatment after successful reperfusion with endovascular therapy. However, it remains unknown if the response to blood pressure treatment is modified by other factors., Objective: To carry out a post hoc analysis of the BP TARGET trial data to determine if the response to blood pressure treatment is modified by factors such as age, history of hypertension, recanalization status, location of occlusion, diabetes, hyperglycemia, or pretreatment with intravenous thrombolysis., Methods: This is a post hoc analysis of the BP TARGET trial. Patients were divided into groups based on age, diabetes, blood glucose, site of occlusion, history of hypertension, and pretreatment with intravenous thrombolysis. The primary outcome was any intraparenchymal hemorrhage., Results: 318 patients were included. Diabetes modified the treatment effect on favorable functional outcome (P heteogenity =0.041). There was a trend towards benefit from intensive SBP treatment in diabetic patients (OR=2.81; 95% CI 0.88 to 8.88; p=0.08) but not in non-diabetic patients (OR=0.75; 95% 0.45 to 126; p 0.28). Age, location of occlusion, admission SBP, pretreatment with intravenous thrombolysis, and history of hypertension did not modify the effect of intensive SBP treatment on any of the outcomes., Conclusion: The effect of SBP lowering treatment was not modified by age, location of occlusion history of hypertension, intravenous thrombolysis, and admission SBP. Diabetes modified the effect of intensive SBP lowering treatment, and there was a trend towards benefit from intensive SBP treatment in diabetic patients. This finding is hypothesis generating and requires further validation., Competing Interests: Competing interests: RB, MP declare institutional fees for teaching presentations from Stryker, MicroVention, Balt; MM declares institutional fees for teaching presentations from Boerhinger Ingelheim, Amgen, and consulting fees from Boerhinger Ingelheim, Air liquide, Acticor Biotech; AdH declares grants from Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; grants from AMAG Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; compensation from Integra for consultant services; and stock options in Certus., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Objective: Two randomized trials demonstrated the benefit of endovascular therapy (EVT) in patients suffering from a stroke due to a basilar artery occlusion (BAO). However, intravenous thrombolytic (IVT) use before EVT was low in these trials, questioning the added value of this treatment in this setting. We sought to investigate the efficacy and safety of EVT alone compared to IVT + EVT in stroke patients with a BAO., Methods: We analyzed data from the Endovascular Treatment in Ischemic Stroke registry, a prospective, observational, multicenter study of acute ischemic stroke patients treated with EVT in 21 centers in France between 1 January 2015 and 31 December 2021. We included patients with BAO and/or intracranial vertebral artery occlusion and compared patients treated with EVT alone versus IVT + EVT after propensity score (PS) matching. Variables selected for the PS were pre-stroke mRS, dyslipidemia, diabetes, anticoagulation, admission mode, baseline NIHSS and ASPECTS, type of anesthesia, and time from symptom onset to puncture. Efficacy outcomes were good functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] 0-3) and functional independence (mRS 0-2) at 90 days. Safety outcomes were symptomatic intracranial hemorrhages and all-cause mortality at 90 days., Results: Among 385 patients, 243 (134 EVT alone and 109 IVT + EVT) were included after PS matching. There was no difference between EVT alone and IVT + EVT regarding good functional outcome (adjusted odd ratio [aOR] labeling = 1.27, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.68-2.37, p = 0.45) and functional independence (aOR = 1.50, 95% CI, 0.79-2.85, p = 0.21). Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage and all-cause mortality were also similar between the two groups (aOR = 0.42, 95% CI, 0.10-1.79, p = 0.24 and aOR = 0.56, 95% CI, 0.29-1.10, p = 0.09, respectively)., Interpretation: In this PS matching analysis, EVT alone seemed to lead to similar neurological recovery than IVT + EVT, with comparable safety profile. However, given our sample size and the observational nature of this study, further studies are needed to confirm these findings. ANN NEUROL 2023;94:596-604., (© 2023 American Neurological Association.)

Background and Purpose: Acute ischaemic stroke patients with cerebral small vessel disease (CSVD), including cerebral microbleeds (CMBs) and white matter hyperintensities (WMHs), have worse outcomes. The effect was investigated of two blood pressure strategies (intensive vs. standard) and blood pressure variability (BPV) after reperfusion according to CSVD burden in the BP TARGET trial., Methods: Patients with available magnetic resonance imaging at baseline were included. CMBs were described as absent or present and WMH severity was described according to the Fazekas classification (0-1, absent-mild; 2-3, moderate to severe). Outcomes consisted of any intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) at 24 h and favorable outcome at 90 days (modified Rankin Scale score between 0 and 2)., Results: In all, 246 patients were included. The intensive systolic blood pressure target was not associated with lower rates of ICH or favorable outcome according to CSVD subgroups (all p values >0.35). Several BPV parameters were associated with increased odds of ICH in patients with CMBs but not in patients without CMBs (diastolic blood pressure coefficient of variation, odds ratio 2.06, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.13-3.77, in patients with ≥1 CMB vs. 0.94, 95% CI 0.68-1.31, in patients without CMBs, p het  = 0.026). Several diastolic BPV parameters were associated with worse outcomes in patients with severe WMHs but not in patients without WMHs (diastolic blood pressure coefficient of variation, odds ratio 0.32, 95% CI 0.17-0.61, in patients with severe WMHs vs. 1.09, 95% CI 0.67-1.79, in patients without WMHs; p het  = 0.003)., Conclusion: No effect of the intensive systolic blood pressure management strategy was found on ICH occurrence or functional outcome according to CSVD burden. BPV was associated with higher odds of ICH in patients with CMBs and worse outcome in patients with moderate-to-severe WMHs., (© 2023 European Academy of Neurology.)

Background: Endovascular treatment (EVT) for basilar artery occlusions (BAO) is associated with a higher rate of futile recanalization compared with anterior circulation procedures. We aimed to identify the incidence and predictors of poor clinical outcome despite successful reperfusion in current clinical practice., Methods: We used data from the ETIS (Endovascular Treatment in Ischemic Stroke) registry, a prospective multicenter observational registry of stroke treated with EVT in France. Patients undergoing EVT for acute BAO from January 2014 to May 2019 successfully treated within 8 hours from onset were included. Predictors of 90-day poor outcome (modified Rankin Scale (mRS) 4-6) were researched within patients with successful (modified Thrombolysis In Cerebral Infarction (mTICI 2b-3)) and excellent (mTICI 2c-3) reperfusion., Results: Among 242 patients treated within 8 hours, successful reperfusion was achieved in 195 (80.5%) and excellent reperfusion in 120 (49.5%). Poor outcome was observed in 107 (54.8%) and 60 (50%) patients, respectively. In patients with successful early reperfusion, age, higher initial National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score, lower posterior circulation Alberta Stroke Programme Early CT Score (pc-ASPECTS), and absence of prior intravenous thrombolysis were independent predictors of poor outcome. The only treatment factor with an independent predictive value was first-pass mTICI 2b-3 reperfusion (adjusted OR 0.13, 95% CI 0.05 to 0.37, p<0.001). In patients with excellent early reperfusion, independent predictors were age, initial NIHSS score, first-pass mTICI 2c-3 reperfusion, and hemorrhagic transformation on post-interventional imaging., Conclusions: Early successful reperfusion with EVT occurred in 80.5% of patients, and the only treatment-related factor predictive of clinical outcome was first pass mTICI 2b-3 reperfusion. Further research is warranted to identify the optimal techniques and devices associated with first pass reperfusion in the posterior circulation., Competing Interests: Competing interests: FC: Consulting fees from Medtronic, Stryker, Balt. Payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events from Penumbra, Balt, Medtronic. Participation on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board – Clinsearch. J-CG: Consulting fees from Medtronic, Stryker, Balt. Support for attending meetings and/or travel from Balt. Participation on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board – Intradys. AR: Consulting fees from Balt. IS: Consulting fees from Sanofi Synthé-Labo, Servier, Boheringer Ingelheim, Astra-Zeneca, Novonordisk, Medtronic. Payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events from Sanofi Synthé-Labo, Medtronic, Boheringer Ingelheim, Astra-Zeneca, BMS-Pfizer. GM: Consulting fees from Stryker. Payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events from Medtronic, Microvention., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Objective: Time from stroke onset to reperfusion (TSOR) is strongly associated with outcomes after endovascular treatment. A near-to-complete or complete reperfusion (modified Treatment in Cerebral Ischemia [mTICI] 2c-3) is associated with improved outcomes compared with a successful reperfusion (mTICI 2b). However, it is unknown whether this association remains stable as TSOR increases. Therefore, we sought to investigate the association between TSOR and outcomes according to the reperfusion status., Methods: We analyzed data from the Endovascular Treatment in Ischemic Stroke registry, a prospective, observational, multicentric study of acute ischemic stroke patients treated with endovascular treatment in 21 centers in France. We included patients with anterior occlusions (M1, internal carotid artery, tandem), with a known time of symptom onset. Outcomes were early neurological improvement at 24 hours and favorable outcome (modified Rankin Scale between 0 and 2) at 90 days., Results: Overall, 4,444 patients were analyzed. Compared with a mTICI 2b, a mTICI 2c-3 at 1 hour was associated with higher mean marginal probabilities of early neurological improvement (25.6%, 95% CI 11.7-39.5, p = 0.0003) and favorable outcome (15.2%, 95% CI 3.0-27.4, p = 0.0143), and progressively declined with TSOR. The benefit of a mTICI 2c-3 over a mTICI 2b was no longer significant regarding the rates of early neurological improvement and favorable outcome after a TSOR of 414 and 344 minutes, respectively., Interpretation: The prognostic value of a complete over a successful reperfusion progressively declined with time, and no difference regarding the rates of favorable outcome was observed between a complete and successful reperfusion beyond 5.7 hours. ANN NEUROL 2023;93:934-941., (© 2023 American Neurological Association.)

Background: The number of mechanical thrombectomy (MT) passes is strongly associated with angiographic reperfusion as well as clinical outcomes in patients with anterior circulation ischemic stroke. However, these associations have not been analyzed in patients with basilar artery occlusion (BAO). We investigated the influence of the number of MT passes on the degree of reperfusion and clinical outcomes, and compared outcome after ≤3 passes versus >3 passes., Methods: We used data from the prospective multicentric Endovascular Treatment in Ischemic Stroke (ETIS) Registry at 18 sites in France. Patients with BAO treated with MT were included. The primary outcome was a favorable outcome, defined as a modified Rankin Scale score of 0-3 at 90 days. We fit mixed multiple regression models, with center as a random effect., Results: We included 275 patients. Successful recanalization (modified Thrombolysis In Cerebral Infarction (mTICI) 2b-3) was achieved in 88.4%, and 41.8% had a favorable outcome. The odds ratio for favorable outcome with each pass above 1 was 0.41 (95% CI 0.23 to 0.73) and for recanalization (mTICI 2b-3) it was 0.70 (95% CI 0.57 to 0.87). In patients with ≤3 passes, the rate of favorable outcome in recanalized versus non-recanalized patients was 50.5% versus 10.0% (p=0.001), while in those with >3 passes it was 16.7% versus 15.2% (p=0.901)., Conclusions: We found that BAO patients had a significant relationship between the number of MT passes and both recanalization and favorable functional outcome. We further found that the benefit of recanalization in BAO patients was significant only when recanalization was achieved within three passes, encouraging at least three passes before stopping the procedure., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Background: Patients with pre-stroke disability, defined as a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) ≥3, were excluded from most trials of endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) for acute stroke. We sought to evaluate the prognostic factors associated with favorable outcome in stroke patients with known disability undergoing EVT, and the impact of successful reperfusion., Methods: Consecutive acute stroke patients with pre-stroke disability, undergoing EVT, were retrospectively collected between 2016 to 2019 from a Canadian cohort and a multicenter French cohort (Endovascular Treatment in Ischemic Stroke registry-ETIS). Favorable outcome was defined as an mRS equal to pre-stroke mRS. Patients achieving successful reperfusion (defined as a modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction score of 2b/3) were compared with patients without successful reperfusion to determine if successful EVT was associated with better functional outcomes., Results: Among 6220 patients treated with EVT, 280 (4.5%) patients with a pre-stroke mRS ≥3 were included. Sixty-one patients (21.8%) had a favorable outcome and 146 (52.1%) died at 3 months. Patients with successful reperfusion had a higher proportion of favorable 90-day mRS (27.6% versus 19.6%, p = 0.025) and a lower mortality (48.3% versus 69.6%, p = 0.008) than patients without successful reperfusion. After adjusting for baseline prognostic factors, successful reperfusion defined by TICI ≥2b was associated with favorable functional outcome (OR 3.16 CI95% [1.11-11.5]; p 0.048)., Conclusion: In patients with pre-stroke disability, successful reperfusion is associated with a greater proportion of favorable outcome and lower mortality., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest Authors declare no conflicts of interests., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Advances in deep learning can be applied to acute stroke imaging to build powerful and explainable prediction models that could supersede traditionally used biomarkers. We aimed to evaluate the performance and interpretability of a deep learning model based on convolutional neural networks (CNN) in predicting long-term functional outcome with diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) acquired at day 1 post-stroke. Ischemic stroke patients (n = 322) were included from the ASTER and INSULINFARCT trials as well as the Pitié-Salpêtrière registry. We trained a CNN to predict long-term functional outcome assessed at 3 months with the modified Rankin Scale (dichotomized as good [mRS ≤ 2] vs. poor [mRS ≥ 3]) and compared its performance to two logistic regression models using lesion volume and ASPECTS. The CNN contained an attention mechanism, which allowed to visualize the areas of the brain that drove prediction. The deep learning model yielded a significantly higher area under the curve (0.83 95%CI [0.78-0.87]) than lesion volume (0.78 [0.73-0.83]) and ASPECTS (0.77 [0.71-0.83]) (p < 0.05). Setting all classifiers to the specificity as the deep learning model (i.e., 0.87 [0.82-0.92]), the CNN yielded a significantly higher sensitivity (0.67 [0.59-0.73]) than lesion volume (0.48 [0.40-0.56]) and ASPECTS (0.50 [0.41-0.58]) (p = 0.002). The attention mechanism revealed that the network learned to naturally attend to the lesion to predict outcome.

Background: Management of extracranial internal carotid artery steno-occlusive lesion during endovascular therapy remains debated. Stent occlusion within 24 hours of endovascular therapy is a frequent event after acute carotid artery stenting, and we currently lack large population results. We investigated the incidence, predictors, and clinical impact of stent occlusion after acute carotid artery stenting in current clinical practice., Methods: Patients treated by endovascular therapy with acute carotid artery stenting between 2015 and 2019 in 5 large-volume endovascular-capable centers were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were separated in 2 groups according to the stent patency at 24 hours after carotid artery stenting. We compared baseline characteristics, treatment modalities, and clinical outcome depending on 24-hour stent patency. Primary end point was favorable outcome, defined as a modified Rankin Scale score 0-2 at 3 months., Results: A stent occlusion was observed in 47/225 patients (20.9%). Patients with stent patency had a lower baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (median [interquartile range]: 13 [7-17] versus 18 [12-21]) and had more often stroke of atherothrombotic origin (77.0% versus 53.2%). A higher stent patency rate was found for patients treated with P2Y 12 antagonists at the acute phase (odds ratio [OR]' 2.95 [95% CI' 1.10-7.91]; P =0.026) and treated with angioplasty (OR' 2.42 [95% CI' 1.24-4.67]; P =0.008). A better intracranial angiographic reperfusion was observed in patients with 24-hour stent patency compared with patients without stent patency (OR' 8.38 [95% CI' 3.07-22.78]; P <0.001). Patients with a stent patency at 24 hours had a higher chance of favorable outcome (OR' 3.29 [95% CI, 1.66-6.52]; P <0.001) and a lower risk of death (OR' 0.32 [95% CI, 0.13-0.76]; P =0.009)., Conclusions: One out of 5 patients treated with carotid artery stenting during endovascular therapy presented a stent occlusion within 24 hours. This event was associated with worse functional outcome. Stroke etiology, P2Y 12 antagonist administration, quality of intracranial reperfusion, and angioplasty were associated with 24-hour stent patency.

Background: It is unknown whether collateral status modifies the effect of pretreatment intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) on the outcomes of patients with large vessel occlusions treated with endovascular therapy (EVT). We aimed to assess whether collateral status modifies the effect of IVT on the outcomes of EVT in clinical practice., Methods: We used data from the ongoing prospective multicentric Endovascular Treatment in Ischemic Stroke (ETIS) Registry in France. Patients with anterior circulation proximal large vessel occlusions treated with EVT within 6 hours of symptom onset were enrolled. Patients were divided into two groups based on pretreatment with IVT. The two groups were matched based on baseline characteristics. We tested the interaction between collateral status and IVT in unadjusted and adjusted models., Results: A total of 1589 patients were enrolled in the study, of whom 55% received IVT. Using a propensity score matching method, 724 no IVT patients were matched to 549 IVT patients. In propensity score weighted analysis, IVT was associated with higher odds of early neurological improvement (OR 1.74; 95% CI 1.33 to 2.26), favorable functional outcome (OR 1.66; 95% CI 1.23 to 2.24), excellent functional outcome (OR 2.04; 95% CI 1.47 to 2.83), and successful reperfusion (OR 2.18; 95% CI 1.51 to 3.16). IVT was not associated with mortality or hemorrhagic complications. There was no interaction between collateral status and IVT association with any of the outcomes., Conclusions: Collateral status does not modify the effect of pretreatment IVT on the efficacy and safety outcomes of EVT., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Background and Purpose: Two early basilar artery occlusion (BAO) randomized controlled trials (RCTs) did not establish the superiority of endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) over medical management. Yet many providers continued to recommend EVT. The goal of the present article is to compare physicians' diagnostic and management strategies of BAO among middle-income and high-income countries (MICs and HICs, respectively)., Methods: We conducted an international survey from January to March 2022 regarding management strategies in acute BAO, to examine clinical and imaging parameters influencing clinician management of patients with BAO. We compared responses between physicians from HIC and MIC., Results: Among the 1245 respondents from 73 countries, 799 (64.2%) were from HIC, with the remaining 393 (31.6%) from MIC. Most respondents perceived that EVT was superior to medical management for acute BAO, but more so in respondents from HIC (98.0% vs. 94.2%, p < 0.01). MIC respondents were more likely to believe further RCTs were warranted (91.6% vs. 74.0%, p < 0.01) and were more likely to find it acceptable to enroll any patient who met a trial's criteria in the standard medical treatment arm (58.8% vs. 38.5%, p < 0.01)., Conclusions: In an area where clinical equipoise was called into question despite the lack of RCT evidence, we found that respondents from MIC were more likely to express willingness to enroll patients with BAO in an RCT than their HIC counterparts.

Background and Purpose: First pass effect (FPE), the occurrence of complete reperfusion after one pass with no rescue attempt during endovascular therapy (EVT), is associated with the best clinical outcome after an acute ischemic stroke (AIS). Previous studies evaluating FPE occurrence according to EVT technical strategies, occlusion locations, or thrombus composition have provided controversial results. Here, we performed a correlation analysis between FPE occurrence and AIS thrombus cellular composition, as assessed using quantitative biochemical assays., Patients and Methods: Homogenates of AIS thrombi from 250 patients were prepared by mechanical grinding. Platelet, red blood cell (RBC), and leukocyte contents of AIS thrombi were respectively estimated by quantification of GP (glycoprotein) VI, heme, and DNA in thrombus homogenates. FPE was defined as a modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infraction (mTICI) score of 2C or 3 after a single EVT device pass., Results: AIS thrombi successfully removed after a single pass were poorer in GPVI (0.098 ± 0.023 vs 0.111 ± 0.024 ng/mg, p  < 0.001) compared to those whose removal had required several passes. GPVI content was also significantly associated with a higher number of device passes and a longer procedure time. No such significant correlation was found with DNA and heme content., Discussion and Conclusion: Thrombus platelet content may hamper thrombus removal by EVT. This result suggests that adjunctive therapies or functionalization of retrieval devices targeting platelets may improve EVT efficacy., Competing Interests: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article., (© European Stroke Organisation 2022.)

Purpose: To determine whether reversal of DWI lesions (DWIr) on the DWI-ASPECTS (diffusion weighted imaging Alberta Stroke Program CT Score) template should serve as a predictor of 90-day clinical outcome in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients with pretreatment diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI)-ASPECTS 0-5 treated with thrombectomy, and to determine its predictors in current practice., Methods: We analyzed data of all consecutive patients included in the prospective multicenter national Endovascular Treatment in Ischemic Stroke Registry between 1 January 2015 and 31 December 2020 with a premorbid mRS ≤ 2, who presented with a pretreatment DWI-ASPECTS 0-5 score, underwent thrombectomy and had an available 24 h post-interventional MRI follow-up. Multivariable analyses were performed to evaluate the clinical impact of DWIr on early neurological improvement (ENI), 3‑month modified Rankin scale (mRS) score distribution (shift analysis) and to define independent predictors of DWIr., Results: Early neurological improvement was detected in 82/211 (41.7%) of patients while 3‑month functional independence was achieved by 75 (35.5%) patients. The DWI reversal (39/211, 18.9%) resulted an independent predictor of both ENI (aOR 3.6, 95% CI 1.2-7.7; p 0.018) and 3‑month clinical outcome (aOR for mRS shift: 2.2, 95% CI 1-4.6; p 0.030). Only successful recanalization (mTICI 2c-3) independently predicted DWIr in the studied population (aOR 3.3, 95% CI 1.3-7.9; p 0.009)., Conclusion: The DWI reversal occurs in a non-negligible proportion of DWI-ASPECTS 0-5 patients subjected to thrombectomy and significantly influences clinical outcome. The mTICI 2c-3 recanalization emerged as an independent DWIr predictor., (© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany.)

Background and Objectives: Observational studies described associations between higher systolic blood pressure (SBP) values and intracranial hemorrhages (ICHs) and worse outcomes after successful reperfusion by endovascular therapy (EVT). However, the BP-TARGET trial [BP-Target in Acute Ischemic Stroke to Reduce Hemorrhage after EVT] found that an intensive SBP target did not reduce ICH rates after successful EVT. The presence of contrast enhancement (CE) immediately after reperfusion is also associated with higher odds of ICH and worse outcomes. Our research question was to investigate the effect of 2 SBP strategies after reperfusion on ICH rates and functional outcomes according to the presence of CE in the BP-TARGET trial. We hypothesized that patients with CE could benefit from an intensive SBP control., Methods: We included BP-TARGET patients in whom a brain flat panel was performed immediately after reperfusion. We described CE as present or absent, ICH consisted of any radiographic ICH 24 hours after EVT, and unfavorable outcome consisted of a modified Rankin Scale score between 3 and 6 at 3 months., Results: Among the 324 patients randomized in BP-TARGET, 164 were included in this analysis, of whom 113 (68.9%) presented CE after reperfusion. The 24-hour mean SBP was significantly lower in the intensive SBP group compared with the standard group (129.7 vs 138.3 mm Hg, p < 0.001). Patients with CE and randomized in the intensive and standard SBP group had increased ICH rates: aOR = 11.26, 95% CI 4.59-27.63, and aOR = 4.08, 95% CI 1.75-9.50, respectively. However, the test of heterogeneity did not reach the significant level (aOR = 2.76, 95% CI 0.80 to 9.48, p = 0.11). Patients with CE and randomized in the intensive SBP group had also higher odds of unfavorable outcomes (aOR = 2.91, 95% CI 1.24-6.82), but this association was not significant in the standard SBP group (aOR = 1.89, 95% CI 0.85-4.23). No significant heterogeneity was found between the 2 groups (aOR, 1.54, 95% CI 0.48 to 4.97, p = 0.47)., Discussion: Altogether, patients with CE and randomized in the intensive SBP group did not have lower rates of ICH or improved outcomes compared with the standard SBP group, as CE was associated with higher odds of ICH in both groups, without significant heterogeneity., Trial Registration Information: NCT03160677., Classification of Evidence: This study provides Class IV evidence that for adults with contrast-enhancing lesions after successful EVT of an AIS, intensive blood pressure management did not significantly increase the risk of ICH., (© 2022 American Academy of Neurology.)

Objective: Despite a 90% reperfusion rate, only 50% of patients with anterior circulation large vessel occlusion-related acute ischemic stroke (LVO-AIS) have a functional recovery at 3 months. Parenchymal hematoma (PH) is a predictor of poor outcome after endovascular treatment (EVT). We aim to investigate the relationship between the delay from onset to reperfusion, the occurrence of PH, and functional outcome., Methods: The Endovascular Treatment in Ischemic Stroke (ETIS) registry is an ongoing prospective observational study. Data were analyzed from the subgroup of patients who underwent a successful EVT defined by a modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction (mTICI) score 2b-3. We assessed the factors associated with PH, (ie, PH1 or PH2 grade according to the European Collaborative Acute Stroke Study 2 (ECASS) classification of hemorrhagic transformation), then evaluated the relationships between PH, delay from onset to reperfusion, and functional recovery defined by a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) of 0-2., Results: We analyzed 2,919 patients with an LVO-related AIS who underwent a successful EVT. Overall, 13.3% of the participant experienced a PH. The rate of PH increased by 2.5% (95% CI 1.5%-3.6%, p < 0.001) for every additional hour of onset to reperfusion delay and was, by comparison with the other study patients, consistently associated with a lower rate of functional recovery 19.7% (95% CI 11.6%-27.7%, p < 0.001) irrespective of time from onset to reperfusion., Interpretation: Our results demonstrate that PH rate is associated with the delay from onset to reperfusion and participates in the relationship between time to reperfusion and outcome. Time is Bleeding. ANN NEUROL 2022;92:882-887., (© 2022 American Neurological Association.)

Background and Purpose: Despite continuous improvement and growing knowledge in the endovascular therapy of large vessel occlusion stroke (LVOS), mechanical thrombectomy (MT) still fails to obtain satisfying intracranial recanalization in 10% to 15% of cases. However, little is known regarding clinical and radiological outcomes among this singularly underexplored subpopulation undergoing failed MT. We aimed to investigate the outcome after failed MT and identify predictive factors of favorable outcome despite recanalization failure., Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of consecutive patients prospectively included in the ongoing observational multicenter Endovascular Treatment in Ischemic Stroke registry from January 2015 to September 2020. Patients presenting with anterior circulation LVOS treated with MT but experiencing failed intracranial recanalization defined as final modified Thrombolysis In Cerebral Infarction (mTICI) score of 0, 1 and 2a were included. Clinical and radiological outcomes were assessed along with the exploration of predictive factors of Day-90 favorable outcome., Results: The study population comprised 533 patients. Mean age was 68.8 ± 16 years, and median admission National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) and Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography Score (ASPECTS) were 17 (IQR 12-21) and 7 (IQR 5-8), respectively. Favorable outcomes were observed in 85 patients (18.2%) and 186 died (39.0%). The rate of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage was 14.1%. In multivariable analysis, younger age (odds ratio [OR] 0.96, 95% CI 0.94-0.98, p &lt; 0.001), a lower admission NIHSS (OR 0.87, 95% CI 0.83-0.91, p &lt; 0.001), a lower number of MT passes (OR 0.77, 95% CI 0.77-0.87, p &lt; 0.001), a lower delta ASPECTS between initial and Day-1 imaging (OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.71-0.98, p = 0.026) and stroke etiology [significant difference among etiological subtypes (p = 0.024) with a tendency toward more favorable outcomes for dissection (OR 2.01, 95% CI 0.71-5.67)] were significantly associated with a 90-day favorable outcome., Conclusions: In this large retrospective analysis of a multicenter registry, we quantified the poor outcome after MT failure. We also identified factors associated with favorable outcome despite recanalization failure that might influence therapeutic management., (© 2022 The Authors. European Journal of Neurology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Academy of Neurology.)

Background: The best treatment for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) due to isolated cervical internal carotid artery occlusion (CICAO) (i.e., without associated occlusion of the circle of Willis) is still unknown. In this study, we aimed to describe EVT safety and clinical outcome in patients with CICAO., Methods: We analyzed data of all consecutive patients, included in the Endovascular Treatment in Ischemic Stroke (ETIS) Registry between 2013 and 2020, who presented AIS and proven CICAO on angiogram and underwent EVT. We assessed carotid recanalization, procedural complications, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) at 24 h post-EVT, and 3-month favorable outcome (modified Rankin Scale, mRS ≤ 2 or equal to the pre-stroke value)., Results: Forty-five patients were included (median age: 70 years; range: 62-82 years). The median NIHSS before EVT was 14 (9-21). Carotid stenting was performed in 23 (51%) patients. Carotid recanalization at procedure end and on control imaging was observed in 37 (82%) and 29 (70%) patients, respectively. At day 1 post-EVT, the NIHSS remained stable or decreased in 25 (60%) patients; 12 (29%) patients had early neurologic deterioration (NIHSS ≥ 4 points). The rate of procedural complications was 36%, including stent thrombosis (n = 7), intracranial embolism (n = 7), and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (n = 1). At 3 months, 18 (40%) patients had a favorable outcome, and 10 (22%) were dead., Conclusion: Our study suggests that EVT in AIS patients with moderate/severe initial deficit due to CICAO led to high rate of recanalization at day 1, and a 40% rate of favorable outcome at 3 months. There was a high rate of procedural complication which is of concern. Randomized controlled trials assessing the superiority of EVT in patients with CICAO and severe deficits are needed., (© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany.)

Background: Hypotension and blood pressure (BP) variability during endovascular therapy (EVT) for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) due to an anterior large vessel occlusion (LVO) is associated with worse outcomes. However, the optimal BP threshold during EVT is still unknown given the lack of randomized controlled evidence. We designed the DETERMINE trial to assess whether an individualized BP management during EVT could achieve better functional outcomes compared to a standard BP management., Methods: The DETERMINE trial is a multicenter, prospective, randomized, controlled, open-label, blinded endpoint clinical trial (PROBE design). AIS patients with a proximal anterior LVO are randomly assigned, in a 1:1 ratio, to an experimental arm in which mean arterial pressure (MAP) is maintained within 10% of the first MAP measured before EVT, or a control arm in which systolic BP (SBP) is maintained within 140-180 mm Hg until reperfusion is achieved or artery closure in case of EVT failure. The primary outcome is the rate of favorable functional outcomes, defined by a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) between 0 and 2 at 90 days. Secondary outcomes include excellent outcome and ordinal analysis of the mRS at 90 days, early neurological improvement at 24 h (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale), final infarct volume, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage rates, and all-cause mortality at 90 days. Overall, 432 patients will be included., Discussion: DETERMINE will assess the clinical relevance of an individualized BP management before reperfusion compared to the one size fits all approach currently recommended by international guidelines., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT04352296. Registered on 20th April 2020., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Background: Whether thrombectomy alone is equally as effective as intravenous alteplase plus thrombectomy remains controversial. We aimed to determine whether thrombectomy alone would be non-inferior to intravenous alteplase plus thrombectomy in patients presenting with acute ischaemic stroke., Methods: In this multicentre, randomised, open-label, blinded-outcome trial in Europe and Canada, we recruited patients with stroke due to large vessel occlusion confirmed with CT or magnetic resonance angiography admitted to endovascular centres. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) via a centralised web server using a deterministic minimisation method to receive stent-retriever thrombectomy alone or intravenous alteplase plus stent-retriever thrombectomy. In both groups, thrombectomy was initiated as fast as possible with any commercially available Solitaire stent-retriever revascularisation device (Medtronic, Irvine, CA, USA). In the combined treatment group, intravenous alteplase (0·9 mg/kg bodyweight, maximum dose 90 mg per patient) was administered as early as possible after randomisation for 60 min with 10% of the calculated dose given as an initial bolus. Personnel assessing the primary outcome were masked to group allocation; patients and treating physicians were not. The primary binary outcome was a score of 2 or less on the modified Rankin scale at 90 days. We assessed the non-inferiority of thrombectomy alone versus intravenous alteplase plus thrombectomy in all randomly assigned and consenting patients using the one-sided lower 95% confidence limit of the Mantel-Haenszel risk difference, with a prespecified non-inferiority margin of 12%. The main safety endpoint was symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage assessed in all randomly assigned and consenting participants. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03192332, and is closed to new participants., Findings: Between Nov 29, 2017, and May 7, 2021, 5215 patients were screened and 423 were randomly assigned, of whom 408 (201 thrombectomy alone, 207 intravenous alteplase plus thrombectomy) were included in the primary efficacy analysis. A modified Rankin scale score of 0-2 at 90 days was reached by 114 (57%) of 201 patients assigned to thrombectomy alone and 135 (65%) of 207 patients assigned to intravenous alteplase plus thrombectomy (adjusted risk difference -7·3%, 95% CI -16·6 to 2·1, lower limit of one-sided 95% CI -15·1%, crossing the non-inferiority margin of -12%). Symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage occurred in five (2%) of 201 patients undergoing thrombectomy alone and seven (3%) of 202 patients receiving intravenous alteplase plus thrombectomy (risk difference -1·0%, 95% CI -4·8 to 2·7). Successful reperfusion was less common in patients assigned to thrombectomy alone (182 [91%] of 201 vs 199 [96%] of 207, risk difference -5·1%, 95% CI -10·2 to 0·0, p=0·047)., Interpretation: Thrombectomy alone was not shown to be non-inferior to intravenous alteplase plus thrombectomy and resulted in decreased reperfusion rates. These results do not support omitting intravenous alteplase before thrombectomy in eligible patients., Funding: Medtronic and University Hospital Bern., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests UF reports financial support for the present study from Medtronic; research grants from Medtronic BEYOND SWIFT registry, the Swiss National Science Foundation, and the Swiss Heart Foundation; consulting fees from Medtronic, Stryker, and CSL Behring (fees paid to institution); has membership of a data safety monitoring board for the IN EXTREMIS trial and the TITAN trial; was on the advisory board for Portola (Alexion; fees paid to institution); and is Vice President of the Swiss Neurological Society. JK reports financial support from Medtronic for the BEYOND SWIFT registry (fees paid to institution); and research grants from the Swiss National Science Foundation supporting the TECNO trial (fees paid to institution), Swiss Academy of Medical Sciences supporting MRI research (fees paid to institution), and Swiss Heart Foundation supporting cardiac MRI in the aetiological work-up of stroke patients (fees paid to institution). CC reports consulting fees from Medtronic. PMo reports research funding (fees paid to institution) from the Swiss National Science Foundation, the Swiss Heart Foundation, and Medtronic. GM reports consulting fees from Stryker Neurovascular; and was paid for lectures for Medtronic and Microvention Europe. IS reports consulting fees from Sanofi Synthé-Labo, Servier, Boheringer Ingelheim, AstraZeneca, Novonordisk, and Medtronic; and payment or honoraria from Sanofi Synthé-Labo, Medtronic, Boheringer Ingelheim, AstraZeneca, and BMS—Pfizer. ON reports funding from a Stryker Research grant; and payment or honoraria for lectures for Phenox and Stryker. MR reports consulting fees from Medtronic, Stryker, Cerenovus, Philips, and Apta Targets; payment or honoraria from Ischemia View; participates on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board of Sensome; and has stock or stock options in Anaconda Biomed, CVAid, and Methinks. EC reports grants from the Swiss Heart Foundation and Swiss National Science Foundation, not related to the present study. ARL reports grants from the University of Zurich, the LOOP Zurich, and P&K Pühringer Foundation; consulting fees from Bayer; and a lecture honorarium from Moleac Pte, Singapore. WP reports grants from the German Research Foundation, LOEWE (research funding of the federal state of Hesse); royalties or licenses from the Stroke Team Training (Laerdal Medical); payment or honoraria from Laerdal Medical, Alexion, Pfizer—BMS, and Stryker Neurovascular; and support for attending meetings or travel from Laerdal Medical, Alexion, Pfizer—BMS, and Stryker Neurovascular. MA reports honoraria for lectures from AstraZeneca, Bayer, Covidien, Medtronic, and Sanofi; and participates on scientific advisory boards of Amgen, Bayer, BMS, Daiichi Sankyo, Medtronic, and Pfizer. AHS reports being a coinvestigator for the US National Institutes of Health (1R01EB030092-01); is mentor for the Carol W Harvey Chair of Research and Sharon Epperson Chair of Research at the Brain Aneurysm Foundation; receipt of consulting fees from Amnis Therapeutics, Apellis Pharmaceuticals, Boston Scientific, Canon Medical Systems USA, Cardinal Health 200, Cerebrotech Medical Systems, Cerenovus, Cerevatech Medical, Cordis, Corindus, Endostream Medical, Imperative Care, InspireMD, Integra, IRRAS AB, Medtronic, MicroVention, Minnetronix Neuro, Peijia Medical, Penumbra, Q’Apel Medical, Rapid Medical, Serenity Medical, Silk Road Medical, StimMed, Stryker Neurovascular, Three Rivers Medical, VasSol, and Viz.ai; is Secretary of the Board of the Society of NeuroInterventional Surgery 2020–2021 (unpaid); is Chair of the Cerebrovascular Section of the AANS/CNS 2020–2021 (unpaid); has stock or stock options in Adona Medical, Amnis Therapeutics, Bend IT Technologies, BlinkTBI, Cerebrotech Medical Systems, Cerevatech Medical, Cognition Medical, CVAID, E8, Endostream Medical, Galaxy Therapeutics, Imperative Care, InspireMD, Instylla, International Medical Distribution Partners, Launch NY, NeuroRadial Technologies, NeuroTechnology Investors, Neurovascular Diagnostics, Peijia Medical, PerFlow Medical, Q’Apel Medical, QAS.ai, Radical Catheter Technologies, Rebound Therapeutics (purchased 2019 by Integra Lifesciences), Rist Neurovascular, (purchased 2020 by Medtronic), Sense Diagnostics, Serenity Medical, Silk Road Medical, Sim & Cure, SongBird Therapy, Spinnaker Medical, StimMed, Synchron, Three Rivers Medical, Truvic Medical, Tulavi Therapeutics, Vastrax, VICIS, and Viseon; and other financial or non-financial interests: national principal investigator or steering committees for Cerenovus EXCELLENT and ARISE II Trial; Medtronic SWIFT PRIME, VANTAGE, EMBOLISE and SWIFT DIRECT Trials; MicroVention FRED Trial and CONFIDENCE Study; MUSC POSITIVE Trial; Penumbra 3D Separator Trial, COMPASS Trial, INVEST Trial, MIVI neuroscience EVAQ Trial; Rapid Medical SUCCESS Trial; and InspireMD C-GUARDIANS IDE Pivotal Trial. MTF reports research grants from Medtronic, Siemens, Genentech, Idorsia, and Vesalio; consulting fees from Genentech, Balt USA, CereNovus, and Oculus Imaging; and participates on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for Balt USA, Jacobs Institute, and Imperative Care. MW reports a grant from Stryker Neurovascular; consulting fees from Stryker Neurovascular; payment or honoraria from Stryker Neurovascular and Bracco Imaging; is board member for the German Society of Neuroradiology (no payments); and receipt of equipment, materials, drugs, medical writing, gifts, or other services from Ab medica, Acandis, Bracco Imaging, Cerenovus, Kaneka Pharmaceuticals, Medtronic, Mentice, Phenox, and Stryker Neurovascular (support to institution). PMa reports grants from the Swiss National Science Foundation; consulting fees from Medtronic and Stryker; payment or honoraria from Medtronic and Stryker; and participated on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board of MicroVention. H-CD reports honoraria for participation in clinical trials, contribution to advisory boards, or oral presentations from Abbott, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Daiichi-Sankyo, Novo-Nordisk, Pfizer, Portola, and WebMD Global; financial support for research projects from Boehringer Ingelheim; received research grants from the German Research Council and German Ministry of Education and Research; serves as Editor of Neurologie up2date, InFo Neurologie & Psychiatrie, Arzneimitteltherapie, and coeditor of Cephalalgia; and is on the editorial board of The Lancet Neurology and Drugs. MM reports payment or honoraria from Boehringer Ingelheim. DSL reports consulting fees from Cerenovus, Genentech, Medtronic, Stryker, and Rapid Medical as imaging core laboratory. JLS reports funding for the present study from Medtronic; consulting fees from Cerenovus; participates on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for MIVI and Phillips; and has stock or stock options in Rapid Medical. JG reports a Swiss National Funds grant for MRI in stroke. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Despite constant improvements in recent years, sufficient reperfusion after mechanical thrombectomy (MT) is not reached in up to 15% of patients with large vessel occlusion stroke (LVOS). The outcome of patients with unsuccessful reperfusion after MT especially after intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) use is not known. We investigated the influence of initial IVT in this particular group of patients with failed intracranial recanalization., Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of the Endovascular Treatment in Ischemic Stroke (ETIS) registry from January 2015 to December 2019. Patients presenting with LVOS of the anterior circulation and final modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction score (mTICI) of 0, 1 or 2a were included. Posterior circulation, isolated cervical carotid occlusions and successful reperfusions (mTICI 2b, 2c or 3) were excluded. The primary endpoint was favorable outcome (modified Rankin Scale score of 0-2) after 3 months. Secondary endpoints were safety outcomes including mortality, any intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), parenchymal hematoma (PH) and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) rates., Results: Among 5076 patients with LVOS treated with MT, 524 patients with insufficient recanalization met inclusion criteria, of which 242 received IVT and 282 did not. Functional outcome was improved in the MT+IVT group compared with the MT alone group, although the difference did not reach statistical significance (23.0% vs 12.9%; adjusted OR=1.82; 95% CI 0.98 to 3.38; p=0.058). However, 3 month mRS shift analysis showed a significant benefit of IVT (adjusted OR=1.68; 95% CI 1.56 to 6.54). ICH and sICH rates were similar in both groups, although PH rate was higher in the MT+IVT group (adjusted OR=3.20; 95% CI 1.56 to 6.54)., Conclusions: Among patients with LVOS in the anterior circulation and unsuccessful MT, IVT was associated with improved functional outcome even after unsuccessful MT. Despite recent trials questioning the place of IVT in the LVOS reperfusion strategy, these findings emphasize a subgroup of patients still benefiting from IVT., Competing Interests: Competing interests: Outside this work: JL reports grants from Stryker, Penumbra and Microvention. MM reports personal fees from Acticor Biotech, Air liquide, Amgen and Boerhinger., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Background: Acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients with a history of hypertension experience worse outcomes, which may be explained by a deleterious impact of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) overactivation. We sought to investigate whether prestroke antihypertensive treatments (AHT) influenced baseline stroke severity and neurological outcomes, in patients with AIS successfully treated by endovascular therapy., Methods: We performed a post hoc analysis of the BP TARGET trial (Blood Pressure Target in Acute Stroke to Reduce Hemorrhage After Endovascular Therapy) and included hypertensive patients with available data regarding AHT at admission, categorized as RAS inhibitors (ACE [angiotensin-converting enzyme] inhibitors, ARBs [angiotensin 2 receptor blockers], and β-blockers) and non-RAS inhibitors (calcium channel blockers and diuretics). Associations of each AHT with National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score at baseline were investigated in linear mixed model adjusted for the number of treatments and center. Associations of each AHT with 24-hour NIHSS change, intracranial hemorrhage were performed using linear mixed model adjusted for baseline NIHSS, the number of treatments, center, age, and sex and adjusted for age, sex, diabetes, and current smoking for favorable outcome. All analyses were performed on cases-available data regarding the low number of missing data., Results: Overall, 203 patients with at least one AHT were included. Patients under non-RAS inhibitor treatments had a higher NIHSS score at baseline (adjusted mean difference=3.28 [95% CI, 1.33-5.22]; P =0.001). Conversely, patients under RAS inhibitor treatments had a lower baseline NIHSS score (adjusted mean difference=-2.81 [95% CI, -5.37 to -0.25]; P =0.031). Intracranial hemorrhage occurrence was significantly more frequent in patients under non-RAS inhibitor treatments (adjusted odds ratio of 2.48 [95% CI, 1.12-5.47]; P =0.025). Conversely, the use of RAS inhibitor treatments before AIS was not associated with higher odds of radiographic intracranial hemorrhage. Patients with non-RAS inhibitor treatments had less improvement of NIHSS at 24 hours compared with patients without (adjusted mean difference, 2.83 [95% CI, -0.16 to 5.81]; P =0.063). Baseline RAS inhibitor or noninhibitor treatments were not associated with favorable outcome., Conclusions: We showed an opposite effect of baseline AHT, based on their effect on the RAS. Patients treated with RAS inhibitor agents before AIS exhibited less severe AIS compared with patients under non-RAS inhibitor treatments, developed less intracranial hemorrhage at 24 hours and had a trend toward better NIHSS score at 24 hours., Registration: URL: https://www., Clinicaltrials: gov; Unique identifier: NCT03160677.

Background: Studies have suggested that collateral status modifies the effect of successful reperfusion on functional outcome after endovascular therapy (EVT). We aimed to assess the association between collateral status and EVT outcomes and to investigate whether collateral status modified the effect of successful reperfusion on EVT outcomes., Methods: We used data from the ongoing, prospective, multicenter Endovascular Treatment in Ischemic Stroke (ETIS) Registry. Collaterals were graded according to the American Society of Interventional and Therapeutic Neuroradiology/Society of Interventional Radiology (ASITN/SIR) guidelines. Patients were divided into two groups based on angiographic collateral status: poor (grade 0-2) versus good (grade 3-4) collaterals., Results: Among 2020 patients included in the study, 959 (47%) had good collaterals. Good collaterals were associated with favorable outcome (90-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS) 0-2) (OR 1.5, 95% CI 1.19 to 1.88). Probability of good outcome decreased with increased time from onset to reperfusion in both good and poor collateral groups. Successful reperfusion was associated with higher odds of favorable outcome in good collaterals (OR 6.01, 95% CI 3.27 to 11.04) and poor collaterals (OR 5.65, 95% CI 3.32 to 9.63) with no significant interaction. Similarly, successful reperfusion was associated with higher odds of excellent outcome (90-day mRS 0-1) and lower odds of mortality in both groups with no significant interaction. The benefit of successful reperfusion decreased with time from onset in both groups, but the curve was steeper in the poor collateral group., Conclusions: Collateral status predicted functional outcome after EVT. However, collateral status on the pretreatment angiogram did not decrease the clinical benefit of successful reperfusion., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Background: The predictors of successful reperfusion and the effect of reperfusion after endovascular treatment (EVT) for M2 occlusions have not been well studied. We aimed to identify predictors of successful reperfusion and the effect of reperfusion on outcomes of EVT for M2 occlusions in current practice., Methods: Patients with acute ischemic stroke due to isolated M2 occlusions who were enrolled in the prospective multicenter Endovascular Treatment in Ischemic Stroke (ETIS) Registry in France between January 2015 and March 2020 were included. The primary outcome was a favorable outcome, defined as modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 0-2 at 90 days. Successful reperfusion was defined as an improvement of ≥1 points in the modified Thrombolysis In Cerebral Infarction score between the first and the last intracranial angiogram., Results: A total of 458 patients were included (median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score 14; 61.4% received prior intravenous thrombolysis). Compared with the non-reperfused patients, reperfused patients had an increased rate of excellent outcome (OR 2.3, 95% CI 0.98 to 5.36; p=0.053), favorable outcome (OR 2.79, 95% CI 1.31 to 5.93; p=0.007), and reduced 90-day mortality (OR 0.39, 95% CI 0.19 to 0.79; p<0.01). Admission NIHSS score was the only predictor of successful reperfusion. First-line strategy was not a predictor of successful reperfusion or favorable outcome, but the use of a stent retriever, alone or with an aspiration catheter, was associated with higher rates of procedural complications and 90-day mortality., Conclusions: Successful reperfusion of M2 occlusions reduced disability and mortality. However, safety is a concern, especially if the procedure failed., Competing Interests: Competing interests: BL reports grants from Stryker, Penumbra, and Microvention., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Background: The best recanalization strategy for mechanical thrombectomy (MT) remains unknown as no randomized controlled trial has simultaneously evaluated first-line stent retriever (SR) versus contact aspiration (CA) versus the combined approach (SR+CA)., Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety profiles of SR, CA, and SR+CA in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) treated by MT., Methods: We analyzed data of the Endovascular Treatment in Ischemic Stroke (ETIS) Registry, a prospective, multicenter, observational study of patients with AIS treated by MT. Patients with M1 and intracranial internal carotid artery (ICA) occlusions between January 2015 and March 2020 in 15 comprehensive stroke centers were included. We assessed the association of first-line strategy with favorable outcomes at 3 months (modified Rankin Scale score 0-2), successful recanalization rates (modified Thrombolysis In Cerebral Infarction (mTICI) 2b/3), and safety outcomes., Results: We included 2643 patients, 406 treated with SR, 1126 with CA, and 1111 with SR+CA. CA or SR+CA achieved more successful recanalization than SR for M1 occlusions (aOR=2.09, (95% CI 1.39 to 3.13) and aOR=1.69 (95% CI 1.12 to 2.53), respectively). For intracranial ICA, SR+CA achieved more recanalization than SR (aOR=2.52 (95% CI 1.32 to 4.81)), no differences were observed between CA and SR+CA. SR+CA was associated with lower odds of favorable outcomes compared with SR (aOR=0.63 (95% CI 0.44 to 0.90)) and CA (aOR=0.71 (95% CI 0.55 to 0.92)), higher odds of mortality at 3 months (aOR=1.56 (95% CI 1.22 to 2.0)) compared with CA, and higher odds of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (aOR=1.59 (95% CI 1.1 to 2.3)) compared with CA., Conclusions: Despite high recanalization rates, our results question the safety of the combined approach, which was associated with disability and mortality. Randomized controlled trials are needed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of these techniques., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Acute ischemic stroke (AIS) is the most common neurologic complication of infective endocarditis. We describe a singular case report of a 62- year-old male with AIS related to the occlusion of the left middle cerebral artery. Thrombus-aspiration allowed retrieving a 6 millimeters white thrombus. The real-time polymerase chain reaction performed on the thrombus detected Coxiella Burnetii allowed the diagnosis of infective endocarditis (IE) and the identification of the specific pathogen. Coxiella Burnetii is an endemic, small, intracellular, gram-negative coccobacillus and it is a rare cause of IE. The management of AIS caused by IE remains controversial, although in the cases of major occlusion mechanical thrombectomy is associated with better clinical outcomes. IE patients could not present symptoms and signs related to the infection, therefore we underline the importance of the microbiological analysis of the retrieved thrombi especially when atypical etiology is suspected.

Background: Endovascular therapy (EVT) is effective and safe in patients with tandem occlusion. The benefit of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) prior to EVT in acute tandem occlusion is debatable., Objective: To compare EVT alone with EVT plus IVT in patients with acute ischemic stroke due to anterior circulation tandem occlusions., Methods: This is an individual patient pooled analysis of the Thrombectomy In TANdem lesions (TITAN) and Endovascular Treatment in Ischemic Stroke (ETIS) Registries. Patients were divided into two groups based on prior IVT treatment: (1) IVT+ group, which included patients who received IVT prior to EVT, (2) IVT- group, which included patients who did not receive IVT prior to EVT. Propensity score (inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW)) was used to reduce baseline between-group differences. The primary outcome was favorable outcome-that is, modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score 0 to 2 at 90 days., Results: Overall, 602 consecutive patients with an acute stroke with tandem occlusion were included (380 and 222 in the bridging therapy and EVT alone groups, respectively). Onset to imaging time was shorter in the IVT+ group (median 103 vs 140 min). In contrast, imaging to puncture time was longer in the IVT+ group (median 107 vs 91 min). In IPTW analysis, the IVT+ group had higher odds of favorable outcome, excellent outcome (90-day mRS score 0-1), and successful reperfusion (modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction score 2b/3 at the end of EVT). There was no difference in the risk of significant hemorrhagic complications between groups. In secondary analysis of patients treated with acute cervical internal carotid artery stenting, bridging therapy was associated with higher odds of favorable outcome and lower odds of mortality at 90 days., Conclusions: Our results suggest that bridging therapy in patients with acute ischemic stroke due to anterior tandem occlusion is safe and may improve functional outcome, even in the setting of acute cervical internal carotid artery stenting during EVT., Competing Interests: Competing interests: AMS reports support from Penumbra, Stryker, Medtronic; and consulting fees from: Terumo, Stryker, Penumbra, Siemens. BL reports grants from Stryker, Penumbra, and Microvention. MM reports personal fees from Acticor Biotech, Air liquide, Amgen, and Boerhinger. RGN: principal investigator, Stryker Neurovascular (DAWN trial (no compensation), Trevo-2 trial), Cerenovus/Neuravi (ENDOLOW trial, no compensation); consultant to Stryker Neurovascular; steering committee member, Stryker Neurovascular(no compensation), Medtronic (SWIFT trial, SWIFT Prime trial (no compensation)), Cerenovus/Neuravi (ARISE-2 trial, no compensation); angiographic core lab, Medtronic (STAR trial); executive committee member, Penumbra (no compensation); physician advisory board, Cerenovus/Neuravi, Phenox, Anaconda, Genentech, Biogen, Prolong Pharmaceuticals, Allm Inc.(no compensation), Viz-AI (stock options). AHS: financial interest/investor/stock options/ownership: Amnis Therapeutics, Apama Medical,Blink TBI, Inc., Buffalo Technology Partners, Inc., Cardinal Health, Cerebrotech Medical Systems, Inc., Claret Medical, Cognition Medical, Endostream Medical, Ltd., Imperative Care, International Medical Distribution Partners, Rebound Therapeutics Corp., Silk Road Medical, StimMed, Synchron, Three Rivers Medical, Inc., Viseon Spine, Inc; consultant/advisory board: Amnis Therapeutics, Boston Scientific, Canon Medical Systems USA, Inc., Cerebrotech Medical Systems, Inc., Cerenovus, Claret Medical, Corindus, Inc., Endostream Medical, Ltd., Guidepoint 15Global Consulting, Imperative Care, Integra, Medtronic, MicroVention, Northwest University—DSMB Chair for HEAT Trial, Penumbra, Rapid Medical, Rebound Therapeutics Corp., Silk Road Medical, StimMed, Stryker, Three Rivers Medical, Inc.,VasSol, W.L. Gore & Associates; national PI/steering committees: Cerenovus LARGE Trial and ARISE II Trial, Medtronic SWIFTPRIME and SWIFT DIRECT Trials, MicroVention FRED Trial & CONFIDENCE Study, MUSC POSITIVE Trial,Penumbra 3D Separator Trial, COMPASS Trial, INVEST Trial; principal investigator: Cummings Foundation grant., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Background: Resistance to fibrinolysis, levels of procoagulant/antifibrinolytic neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs), and the severity of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) are increased by COVID-19. Whether NETs are components of AIS thrombi from COVID-19 patients and whether COVID-19 impacts the susceptibility of these thrombi to thrombolytic treatments remain unknown, however., Objectives: We aimed to characterize AIS thrombi from COVID-19 patients by immunohistology and to compare their response to thrombolysis to that of AIS thrombi from non-COVID-19 patients., Patients/methods: For this monocentric cohort study, 14 thrombi from COVID-19 AIS patients and 16 thrombi from non-COVID-19 patients, all recovered by endovascular therapy, were analyzed by immunohistology or subjected to ex vivo thrombolysis by tissue-type plasminogen (tPA)/plasminogen., Results: COVID-19 AIS thrombi were rich in neutrophils and contained NETs, but not spike protein. Thrombolysis assays revealed a mean resistance profile to tPA/plasminogen of COVID-19 AIS thrombi similar to that of non-COVID-19 AIS thrombi. The addition of DNase 1 successfully improved thrombolysis by potentiating fibrinolysis irrespective of COVID-19 status. Levels of neutrophil, NETs, and platelet markers in lysis supernatants were comparable between AIS thrombi from non-COVID-19 and COVID-19 patients., Conclusions: These results show that COVID-19 does not impact NETs content or worsen fibrinolysis resistance of AIS thrombi, a therapeutic hurdle that could be overcome by DNase 1 even in the context of SARS-CoV-2 infection., (© 2022 International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis.)

Background and Purpose: The Blood Pressure Target in Acute Ischemic Stroke to Reduce Hemorrhage After Endovascular Therapy (BP TARGET) trial evaluated whether an intensive systolic blood pressure (SBP) target resulted in reduced rates of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) after successful endovascular therapy (EVT) but did not assess the effect of blood pressure variability (BPV) on functional outcomes and ICH occurrence. We sought to evaluate this question in the BP TARGET trial., Methods: We performed a post hoc analysis of the BP TARGET trial and included patients with at least 50% of blood pressure (BP) recordings during the first 24 h after EVT. BPV parameters were SBP and diastolic BP (DBP) coefficient of variation (CV), standard deviation (SD), maximum-minimum (max-min), successive variation (SV), and time rate. The primary outcome was favorable functional outcome (3-month modified Rankin Scale between 0 and 2); the secondary outcome was the rate of ICH at 24 h., Results: We included 290 patients (mean number of BP measures = 30.4, SD = 8.0). BPV parameters (SBP SD , SBP max-min , SBP CV ) were higher in the intensive SBP target group. Only DBP BPV parameters were associated with worse functional outcomes in the unadjusted model (DBP SD , DBP max-min , DBP CV , and DBP SV ), but not after adjustment. Higher SBP max-min was associated with worse functional outcomes in Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction 2B patients (odds ratio [OR] = 0.62, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.38-1.02), but not in patients with complete reperfusion (OR = 1.27, 95% CI = 0.80-2.02, p for heterogeneity (p het =0.037). None of the BPV parameters was associated with ICH, regardless of the randomization group or the reperfusion grade., Conclusions: BPV was significantly higher in the intensive SBP target group but was not associated with functional outcome or ICH., (© 2021 European Academy of Neurology.)

Background and Purpose: Rescue therapies are increasingly used in the setting of endovascular therapy for large-vessel occlusion strokes. Among these, cangrelor, a new P2Y12 inhibitor, offers promising pharmacologic properties to join the reperfusion strategies in acute stroke. We assessed the safety and efficacy profiles of cangrelor combined with endovascular therapy in patients with large-vessel-occlusion stroke., Materials and Methods: We performed a retrospective patient data analysis in the ongoing prospective multicenter observational Endovascular Treatment in Ischemic Stroke Registry in France from July 2018 to December 2020 and conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis using several data bases. Indications for cangrelor administration were rescue strategy in case of refractory intracranial occlusion with or without intracranial rescue stent placement, and cervical carotid artery stent placement in case of cervical occlusion (tandem occlusion or isolated cervical carotid occlusion)., Results: In the clinical registry, 44 patients were included (median initial NIHSS score, 12; prior intravenous thrombolysis, 29.5%). Intracranial stent placement was performed in 54.5% ( n  = 24/44), and cervical stent placement, in 27.3% ( n  = 12/44). Adjunctive aspirin and heparin were administered in 75% ( n  = 33/44) and 40.9% ( n  = 18/44), respectively. Rates of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage, parenchymal hematoma, and 90-day mortality were 9.5% ( n  = 4/42), 9.5% ( n  = 4/42), and 24.4% ( n  = 10/41). Favorable outcome (90-day mRS, 0-2) was reached in 51.2% ( n  = 21/41), and successful reperfusion, in 90.9% ( n  = 40/44). The literature search identified 6 studies involving a total of 171 subjects. In the meta-analysis, including our series data, symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage occurred in 8.6% of patients (95% CI, 5.0%-14.3%) and favorable outcome was reached in 47.6% of patients (95% CI, 27.4%-68.7%). The 90-day mortality rate was 22.6% (95% CI, 13.6%-35.2%). Day 1 artery patency was observed in 89.7% (95% CI, 81.4%-94.6%)., Conclusions: Cangrelor offers promising safety and efficacy profiles, especially considering the complex endovascular reperfusion procedures in which it is usually applied. Further large prospective data are required to confirm these findings., (© 2022 by American Journal of Neuroradiology.)

Background and Purpose: To assess the association between systolic blood pressure change (ΔSBP) at different time intervals after successful reperfusion with radiographic and clinical outcomes., Methods: This is a post hoc analysis of the BP-TARGET multicenter trial (Blood Pressure Target in Acute Stroke to Reduce Hemorrhage After Endovascular Therapy). ΔSBP was defined as end of procedure SBP minus mean SBP at different time intervals (15-60 minutes, 1-6 hours, and 6-24 hours postprocedure). The primary outcome was the poor functional outcome (90-day modified Rankin Scale score 3-6)., Results: We included a total of 267 patients (130 in the intensive treatment group). Compared with patients with favorable outcome, patients with poor outcome had lower ΔSBP (less SBP reduction) at all times intervals. After adjusting for potential confounders including baseline SBP, both ΔSBP 15 -60M and ΔSBP 6 -24H were associated with lower odds of poor outcome (adjusted odds ratio per 5 mm Hg SBP reduction, 0.89 [95% CI, 0.81-0.99], and adjusted odds ratio 0.82 [95% CI, 0.73-0.92], respectively). Concerning safety outcomes, patients with intraparenchymal hemorrhage had lower ΔSBP at all time intervals. ΔSBP 15 -60M was associated with lower odds of any intraparenchymal hemorrhage (adjusted odds ratio per 5 mm Hg SBP reduction 0.91 [95% CI, 0.83-0.99]). Conversely, ΔSBP was not associated with mortality or neurological deterioration at any time interval., Conclusions: After successful reperfusion, ΔSBP had a linear relationship with poor outcome and the risk of poor outcome was higher with less reduction from the baseline SBP. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03160677.

Background and Purpose: Approximately half of the patients with acute ischemic stroke due to anterior circulation large vessel occlusion do not achieve functional independence despite successful reperfusion. We aimed to determine influence of reperfusion strategy (bridging therapy, intravenous thrombolysis alone, or mechanical thrombectomy alone) on clinical outcomes in this population., Methods: From ongoing, prospective, multicenter, observational Endovascular Treatment in Ischemic Stroke registry in France, all patients with anterior circulation large vessel occlusion who achieved successful reperfusion (modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction 2b-3) following reperfusion therapy were included. Primary end point was favorable outcome, defined as 90-day modified Rankin Scale score ≤2. Patient groups were compared using those treated with bridging therapy as reference. Differences in baseline characteristics were reduced after propensity score-matching, with a maximum absolute standardized difference of 14% for occlusion site., Results: Among 1872 patients included, 970 (51.8%) received bridging therapy, 128 (6.8%) received intravenous thrombolysis alone, and the remaining 774 (41.4%) received MT alone. The rate of favorable outcome was comparable between groups. Excellent outcome (90-day modified Rankin Scale score 0-1) was achieved more frequently in the bridging therapy group compared with the MT alone (odds ratio after propensity score-matching, 0.70 [95% CI, 0.50-0.96]). Regarding safety outcomes, hemorrhagic complications were similar between the groups, but 90-day mortality was significantly higher in the MT alone group compared with the bridging therapy group (odds ratio, 1.60 [95% CI, 1.09-2.37])., Conclusions: This real-world observational study of patients with anterior circulation large vessel occlusion demonstrated a similar rate of favorable outcome following successful reperfusion with different therapeutic strategies. However, our results suggest that bridging therapy compared with MT alone is significantly associated with excellent clinical outcome and lower mortality., Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03776877.

Background and Purpose: The influence of prior antiplatelet therapy (APT) uses on the outcomes of patients with acute ischemic stroke treated with endovascular therapy is unclear. We compared procedural and clinical outcomes of endovascular therapy in patients on APT or not before stroke onset., Methods: We analyzed 2 groups from the ongoing prospective multicenter Endovascular Treatment in Ischemic Stroke registry in France: patients on prior APT (APT+) and patients without prior APT (APT-) treated by endovascular therapy, with and without intravenous thrombolysis. Multilevel mixed-effects logistic models including center as random effect were used to compare angiographic (rates of reperfusion at the end of procedure, procedural complications) and clinical (favorable and excellent outcome, 90-day all-cause mortality, and hemorrhagic complications) outcomes according to APT subgroups. Comparisons were adjusted for prespecified confounders (age, admission National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score, Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score, intravenous thrombolysis, and time from onset to puncture), as well as for meaningful baseline between-group differences., Results: A total of 2939 patients were analyzed, of whom 877 (29.8%) were on prior APT. Patients with prior APT were older, had more frequent vascular risk factors, cardioembolic stroke mechanism, and prestroke disability. Rates of complete reperfusion (37.9% in the APT- group versus 42.7 % in the APT+ group; aOR, 1.09 [95% CI, 0.88-1.34]; P =0.41) and periprocedural complication (16.9% versus 13.3%; aOR, 0.90 [95% CI, 0.7-1.2]; P =0.66) did not differ between the two groups. Symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (aOR, 0.93 [95% CI, 0.63-1.37]; P =0.73), 3 months favorable clinical outcome (modified Rankin Scale score of 0-2; aOR, 0.98 [95% CI, 0.77-1.25]; P =0.89), and mortality (aOR, 0.95 [95% CI, 0.72-1.26]; P =0.76) at 90 days did not differ between the groups., Conclusions: Prior APT does not influence angiographic and functional outcomes following endovascular therapy and should not be taken into account for acute revascularization strategies.

Background and Purpose: In the settings of thrombectomy, the first-pass effect (FPE), defined by a complete recanalization after one pass with no rescue therapy, has been shown to be associated with an improved outcome. As this phenomenon has been predominantly described in anterior circulation strokes, we aimed to study the prevalence, outcomes, and predictors of FPE in patients with a basilar artery occlusion., Methods: From a prospective multicentric registry, we collected the data of all consecutive basilar artery occlusion patients who underwent thrombectomy and compared the outcomes of patients who achieved FPE and those who did not. We also compared FPE patients with those who achieved a complete recanalization with >1 pass. Finally, a multivariate analysis was performed to determine the predictors of FPE., Results: Data from 280 patients were analyzed in our study, including 84 of 280 patients (30%) with an atheromatous etiology. An FPE was achieved in 93 patients (33.2%), with a significantly higher proportion of good outcomes (modified Rankin Scale score 0-2 at 3 months) and lower mortality than non-FPE patients. An FPE was also associated with improved outcomes compared with patients who went on to have full recanalization with >1 pass. Contact aspiration as first-line strategy was a strong predictor of FPE, whereas baseline antiplatelets and atheromatous etiology were negative predictors., Conclusions: In our study, an FPE was achieved in approximately one-third of patients with a basilar artery occlusion and was associated with improved outcomes. More research is needed to improve devices and techniques to increase the incidence of FPE. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03776877.

Purpose: Acute ischemic stroke (AIS) secondary to a basilar artery occlusion (BAO) carries a poor prognosis, especially in cases of severe symptoms, such as coma at presentation. Despite a lack of evidence, mechanical thrombectomy (MT) is often performed as the procedural risks are felt to be minimal compared to the natural history. We sought to evaluate MT efficacy and safety in comatose BAO patients., Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of a multicenter prospective cohort of consecutive AIS patients with BAO who underwent MT. We compared baseline characteristics between comatose and noncomatose BAO patients, as well as clinical outcomes (modified Rankin scale, mRS 0-3 at 3 months). Using a multivariate logistic regression, we examined the population of comatose patients for baseline predictive factors of mortality., Results: We included 269 patients, 72 (27%) comatose and 197 (73%) non-comatose. Despite similar recanalization rates between comatose and non-comatose patients (83% vs. 90% p = 0.221), comatose patient long-term outcomes were dramatically worse (11% mRS 0-3 vs. 54%, p < 0.0001) and mortality was higher (64% vs. 34%, p < 0.0001). Baseline predictors of mortality at 3 months among comatose BAO patients after multivariate analysis were the following: male sex (odds ratio, OR 31.20, 2.57-378.52, p = 0.007), older age (OR 1.13, 1.04-1.24, p = 0.007) and higher serum glucose levels (OR 1.54, 1.07-2.21, p = 0.019)., Conclusion: Thrombectomy is technically effective for BAO patients presenting with coma; however, the long-term favorable outcome remains poor. Male sex, old age and hyperglycemia were predictors of mortality in these patients., (© 2021. Springer-Verlag GmbH, DE part of Springer Nature.)

Background and Purpose: Procedural complications in thrombectomy for large vessel occlusions of the anterior circulation are not well described. We investigated the incidence, risk factors, and clinical implications of thrombectomy complications in daily clinical practice., Methods: We used data from the ongoing prospective multicenter observational Endovascular Treatment in Ischemic Stroke Registry in France. The present study is a retrospective analysis of 4029 stroke patients with anterior large vessel occlusions treated with thrombectomy between January 2015 and May 2020 in 18 centers. We systematically collected procedural data, incidence of embolic complications, perforations and dissections, clinical outcome at 90 days, and hemorrhagic complications., Results: Procedural complications occurred in 7.99% (95% CI, 7.17%-8.87%), and embolus to a new territory (ENT) was the most frequent (5.2%). Predictors of ENTs were terminal carotid/tandem occlusion (odds ratio [OR], 5 [95% CI, 2.03-12.31]; P <0.001) and an increased total number of passes (OR, 1.22 [95% CI, 1.05-1.41]; P =0.006). ENTs were associated to worse clinical outcomes (90-day modified Rankin Scale score, 0-2; adjusted OR, 0.4 [95% CI, 0.25-0.63]; P <0.001), increased mortality (adjusted OR, 1.74 [95% CI, 1.2-2.53]; P <0.001), and symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (adjusted OR, 1.87 [95% CI, 1.15-3.03]; P =0.011). Perforations occurred in 1.69% (95% CI, 1.31%-2.13%). Predictors of perforations were terminal carotid/tandem occlusions (39.7% versus 27.6%; P =0.028). 40.7% of patients died at 90 days, and the overall rate of poor outcome was 74.6% in case of perforation. Dissections occurred in 1.46% (95% CI, 1.11%-1.88%) and were more common in younger patients (median age, 64.2 versus 70.2 years; P =0.002). Dissections did not affect the clinical outcome at 90 days. Besides dissection, complications were independent of the thrombectomy technique., Conclusions: Thrombectomy complication rate is not negligible, and ENTs were the most frequent. ENTs and perforations were associated with disability and mortality, and terminal carotid/tandem occlusions were a risk factor. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03776877.

Background and Purpose: Endovascular therapy for tandem occlusion strokes of the anterior circulation is an effective and safe treatment. The best treatment approach for the cervical internal carotid artery (ICA) lesion is still unknown. In this study, we aimed to compare the functional and safety outcomes between different treatment approaches for the cervical ICA lesion during endovascular therapy for acute ischemic strokes due to tandem occlusion in current clinical practice., Methods: Individual patients’ data were pooled from the French prospective multicenter observational ETIS (Endovascular Treatment in Ischemic Stroke) and the international TITAN (Thrombectomy in Tandem Lesions) registries. TITAN enrolled patients from January 2012 to September 2016, and ETIS from January 2013 to July 2019. Patients with acute ischemic stroke due to anterior circulation tandem occlusion who were treated with endovascular therapy were included. Patients were divided based on the cervical ICA lesion treatment into stent and no-stent groups. Outcomes were compared between the two treatment groups using propensity score methods., Results: A total of 603 patients were included, of whom 341 were treated with acute cervical ICA stenting. In unadjusted analysis, the stent group had higher rate of favorable outcome (90-day modified Rankin Scale score, 0–2; 57% versus 45%) and excellent outcome (90-day modified Rankin Scale score, 0–1; 40% versus 27%) compared with the no-stent group. In inverse probability of treatment weighting propensity score–adjusted analyses, stent group had higher odds of favorable outcome (adjusted odds ratio, 1.09 [95% CI, 1.01–1.19]; P=0.036) and successful reperfusion (modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Ischemia score, 2b-3; adjusted odds ratio, 1.19 [95% CI, 1.11–1.27]; P<0.001). However, stent group had higher odds of any intracerebral hemorrhage (adjusted odds ratio, 1.10 [95%, 1.02–1.19]; P=0.017) but not higher rate of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage or parenchymal hemorrhage type 2. Subgroup analysis demonstrated heterogeneity according to the lesion type (atherosclerosis versus dissection; P for heterogeneity, 0.01), and the benefit from acute carotid stenting was only observed for patients with atherosclerosis., Conclusions: Patients treated with acute cervical ICA stenting for tandem occlusion strokes had higher odds of 90-day favorable outcome, despite higher odds of intracerebral hemorrhage; however, most of the intracerebral hemorrhages were asymptomatic.

Importance: Mechanical thrombectomy using a stent retriever or contact aspiration is widely used for treatment of patients with acute ischemic stroke due to anterior circulation large vessel occlusion, but the additional benefit of combining contact aspiration with stent retriever is uncertain., Objective: To determine whether mechanical thrombectomy for treatment of anterior circulation large vessel occlusion stroke with initial contact aspiration and stent retriever combined results in better final angiographic outcome than with standard stent retriever alone., Design, Setting, and Participants: This trial was a multicenter randomized, open-label, blinded end point evaluation that enrolled 408 patients from October 16, 2017, to May 29, 2018, in 11 French comprehensive stroke centers, with a 12-month outcome follow-up. Patients with a large vessel occlusion in the anterior circulation were included up to 8 hours after symptom onset. The final date of follow-up was June, 19, 2019., Interventions: Patients were randomly assigned (1:1 allocation) to receive initial thrombectomy with contact aspiration and stent retriever combined (205) or stent retriever alone (203)., Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the rate of expanded Thrombolysis In Cerebral Infarction score of 2c or 3 (eTICI 2c/3; ie, scores indicate near-total and total reperfusion grades) at the end of the procedure., Results: Among the 408 patients who were randomized, 3 were excluded, and 405 (99.3%) patients (mean age, 73 years; 220 [54%] women and 185 [46%] men) were included in the primary analysis. The rate of eTICI 2c/3 at the end of the endovascular procedure was not significantly different between the 2 thrombectomy groups (64.5% [131 of 203 patients] for contact aspiration and stent retriever combined vs 57.9% [117 of 202 patients] for stent retriever alone; risk difference, 6.6% [95% CI, -3.0% to 16.2%]; adjusted odds ratio [OR], 1.33 [95% CI, 0.88 to 1.99]; P = .17). Of 14 prespecified secondary efficacy end points, 12 showed no significant difference. A higher rate of successful reperfusion was achieved in the contact aspiration combined with stent retriever group vs the stent retriever alone group (eTICI 2b50/2c/3, 86.2% vs 72.3%; adjusted OR, 2.54 [95% CI, 1.51 to 4.28]; P < .001) and of near-total or total reperfusion (eTICI 2c/3, 59.6% vs 49.5%; adjusted OR, 1.52 [95% CI, 1.02 to 2.27]; P = .04) after the assigned initial intervention alone., Conclusions and Relevance: Among patients with acute ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion, an initial thrombectomy technique consisting of contact aspiration and stent retriever combined, compared with stent retriever alone, did not significantly improve the rate of near-total or total reperfusion (eTICI 2c/3) at the end of the endovascular procedure, although the trial may have been underpowered to detect smaller differences between groups., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03290885.

Background and Purpose: Despite the widespread adoption of mechanical thrombectomy (MT) for the treatment of large vessel occlusion stroke (LVOS) in the anterior circulation, the optimal strategy for the treatment tandem occlusion related to cervical internal carotid artery (ICA) dissection is still debated. This individual patient pooled analysis investigated the safety and efficacy of prior intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) in anterior circulation tandem occlusion related to cervical ICA dissection treated with MT., Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of two merged prospective multicenter international real-world observational registries: Endovascular Treatment in Ischemic Stroke (ETIS) and Thrombectomy In TANdem occlusions (TITAN) registries. Data from MT performed in the treatment of tandem LVOS related to cervical ICA dissection between January 2012 and December 2019 at 24 comprehensive stroke centers were analyzed. The primary endpoint was a favorable outcome defined as 90-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 0-2., Results: The study included 144 patients with tandem occlusion LVOS due to cervical ICA dissection, of whom 94 (65.3%) received IVT before MT. Prior IVT was significantly associated with a better clinical outcome considering the mRS shift analysis (common odds ratio, 2.59; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.35 to 4.93; P=0.004 for a 1-point improvement) and excellent outcome (90-day mRS 0-1) (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 4.23; 95% CI, 1.60 to 11.18). IVT was also associated with a higher rate of intracranial successful reperfusion (83.0% vs. 64.0%; aOR, 2.70; 95% CI, 1.21 to 6.03) and a lower rate of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (4.3% vs. 14.8%; aOR, 0.21; 95% CI, 0.05 to 0.80)., Conclusions: Prior IVT before MT for the treatment of tandem occlusion related to cervical ICA dissection was safe and associated with an improved 90-day functional outcome.

The benefits of mechanical thrombectomy (MT) for patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) and a large ischemic core (LIC) at presentation are uncertain. We aimed to obtain up-to-date aggregate estimates of the outcomes following MT in patients with volumetrically assessed LIC. We conducted a Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA)-conformed, PROSPERO-registered, systematic review and meta-analysis of studies that included patients with AIS and a baseline LIC treated with MT, reported ischemic core volume quantitatively, and included patients with a LIC defined as a core volume ≥50 mL. The search was restricted to studies published between January 2015 and June 2020. Random-effects-meta-analysis was used to assess the effect of MT on 90-day unfavorable outcome (i.e., modified Rankin Scale [mRS] 3-6), mortality, and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) occurrence. Sensitivity analyses were performed for imaging-modality (computed tomography-perfusion or magnetic resonance-diffusion weighted imaging) and LIC-definition (≥50 or ≥70 mL). We analyzed 10 studies (954 patients), including six (682 patients) with a control group, allowing to compare 332 patients with MT to 350 who received best-medical-management alone. Overall, after MT the rate of patients with mRS 3-6 at 90 days was 74% (99% confidence interval [CI], 67 to 84; Z-value=7.04; I2=92.3%) and the rate of 90-day mortality was 36% (99% CI, 33 to 40; Z-value=-7.07; I2=74.5). Receiving MT was associated with a significant decrease in mRS 3-6 odds ratio (OR) 0.19 (99% CI, 0.11 to 0.33; P<0.01; Z-value=-5.92; I2=62.56) and in mortality OR 0.60 (99% CI, 0.34 to 1.06; P=0.02; Z-value=-2.30; I2=58.72). Treatment group did not influence the proportion of patients experiencing sICH, OR 0.96 (99% CI, 0.2 to 1.49; P=0.54; Z-value=-0.63; I2=64.74). Neither imaging modality for core assessment, nor LIC definition influenced the aggregated outcomes. Using aggregate estimates, MT appeared to decrease the risk of unfavorable functional outcome in patients with a LIC assessed volumetrically at baseline.

Background: Endovascular therapy (EVT) for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) can be challenging in older patients with supra-aortic tortuosity. Rescue carotid puncture (RCP) can be an alternative in case of supra-aortic catheterization failure by femoral access, but data regarding RCP are scarce. We sought to investigate the feasibility, effectiveness and safety of RCP for AIS treated by EVT., Methods: Patients treated by EVT with RCP were included from January 2012 to December 2019 in the Endovascular Treatment in Ischemic Stroke (ETIS) multicentric registry. Main outcomes included reperfusion rates ( ≥ TICI2B), 3 month functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale) and 3 month mortality. We also performed an additional systematic review of the literature according to the PRISMA checklist to summarize previous studies on RCP., Results: 25 patients treated by EVT with RCP were included from the ETIS registry. RCP mainly concerned elderly patients (median age 85 years, range 73-92) with supra-aortic tortuosity (n=16 (64%)). Intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) was used for nine patients (36%). Successful reperfusion was achieved in 64%, 87.5% of patients were dependent at 3 months, and 3 month mortality was 45.8%. The systematic review yielded comparable results. In pooled individual data, there was a shift toward better functional outcome in patients with successful reperfusion (median (IQR) 4 (2-6) vs 6 (4-6), p=0.011)., Conclusion: RCP mainly concerned elderly patients admitted for AIS with anterior LVO with supra-aortic tortuosity. The procedure seemed feasible, notably for patients treated with IVT, and led to significant reperfusion rates at the end of procedure, but with pronounced unfavorable outcomes at 3 months. RCP should be performed under general anesthesia to avoid life-threatening complications and ensure airways safety. Finally, RCP led to low rates of closure complications, emphasizing that this concern should not withhold RCP, if indicated., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Background and Purpose: Hypotension during endovascular therapy for acute ischemic stroke is associated with worse functional outcomes (FO). Given its important role in intracranial hemodynamics, we investigated whether hypotension during endovascular therapy had the same effect on FO according to the posterior communicating artery (PComA) patency., Methods: We performed a post hoc analysis of the ASTER trial (Contact Aspiration Versus Stent Retriever for Successful Revascularization). Patients were included if they had middle cerebral artery occlusions. Primary outcome was favorable FO, defined by a modified Rankin Scale scores between 0 and 2 at 3 months., Results: One hundred forty-eight patients with middle cerebral artery occlusion were included. In patients with no PComA, an increase in minimum mean arterial pressure was positively associated with favorable FO (odds ratio per 10 mm Hg increase, 1.59 [95%CI, 1.11-2.25]; P =0.010), whereas no association was found in patients with a PComA (odds ratio, 0.77 [95% CI, 0.54-1.08]; P =0.12). Patients with no PComA and longer cumulative time with mean arterial pressure <90 mm Hg or systolic blood pressure <140 mm Hg had significantly lower rates of favorable FO, with an odds ratio per 10-minute increase of 0.75 (95% CI, 0.59-0.94; P =0.010) and 0.74 (95% CI, 0.60-0.91; P =0.003), but not in patients with a PComA., Conclusions: Hypotension during endovascular therapy for middle cerebral artery occlusion is consistently associated with worse FO in patients with no PComA but not in those with a PComA. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT02523261.

Background and Purpose: We aimed to evaluate among trained interventional neuroradiologist, whether increasing individual experience was associated with an improvement in mechanical thrombectomy (MT) procedural performance metrics., Methods: Individual MT procedural data from 5 centers of the Endovascular Treatment in Ischemic Stroke registry and 2 additional high-volume stroke centers were pooled. Operator experience was defined for each operator as a continuous variable, cumulating the number of MT procedures performed since January 2015, as MT became standard of care or, if later than this date, since the operator started performing mechanical thrombectomies in autonomy. We tested the associations between operator's experience and procedural metrics., Results: A total of 4516 procedures were included, performed by 36 operators at 7 distinct centers, with a median of 97.5 endovascular treatment procedures per operator (interquartile range, 57-170.2) over the study period. Higher operator's experience, analyzed as a continuous variable, was associated with a significantly shorter procedural duration (β estimate, -3.98 [95% CI, -5.1 to -2.8]; P <0.001), along with local anesthesia and M1 occlusion location in multivariable models. Increasing experience was associated with better Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction scores (estimate, 1.02 [1-1.04]; P =0.013)., Conclusions: In trained interventional neuroradiologists, increasing experience in MT is associated with significantly shorter procedural duration and better reperfusion rates, with a theoretical ceiling effect observed after around 100 procedures. These results may inform future training and practice guidelines to set minimal experience standards before autonomization, and to set-up operators' recertification processes tailored to individual case volume and prior experience.

Background and Purpose: Rescue endovascular and pharmacologic approaches are increasingly being adopted after recanalization failure of acute large-vessel occlusion strokes with mechanical thrombectomy, with encouraging results. The safety and efficacy of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors in ischemic stroke have been investigated, though cangrelor, a recent intravenous P2Y12-receptor inhibitor with a rapid onset/offset of action and a short half-life, may be a valuable option. We compared the safety and efficacy of cangrelor with those of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors for refractory occlusions., Materials and Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of the ongoing prospective, multicenter, observational Endovascular Treatment in Ischemic Stroke Registry in France between May 2012 and February 2020. Refractory intracranial occlusions of the anterior and posterior circulation were included and defined as recanalization failure of large-vessel occlusion stroke, perioperative target artery reocclusion, or high risk of early reocclusion related to an arterial wall lesion. The primary end point was a favorable outcome, defined as a 90-day mRS of 0-2. Secondary end points were reperfusion, intracranial hemorrhage, and procedural complications., Results: Among 69 patients, 15 were treated with cangrelor, and 54, with glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors. The favorable outcome (adjusted OR = 2.22; 95% CI, 0.42-11.75; P = .348) and mortality (adjusted OR = 0.44; 95% CI, 0.06-3.16; P = .411) rates were similar in both groups. There was no difference in the rates of any intracranial hemorrhage (adjusted OR = 0.40; 95% CI, 0.08-2.09; P = .280), symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (6.7% versus 0.0%, P = .058), or procedural complications (6.7% versus 20.4%, P = .215). Reperfusion rates were higher in the cangrelor group, though the difference did not reach statistical significance (93.3% versus 75.0% for modified TICI 2b-3; adjusted OR =10.88; 95% CI, 0.96-123.84; P = .054)., Conclusions: Cangrelor seems to be as safe as glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors for managing refractory intracranial occlusion and leads to satisfactory brain reperfusion. Cangrelor is a promising agent in this setting, and additional studies are warranted to confirm our findings., (© 2021 by American Journal of Neuroradiology.)

Background /objective: Recent studies have suggested that a recanalization grade of modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction (mTICI) score ≥2c is strongly related with good clinical outcome rather than the current therapeutic angiography target ≥2b. To achieve better recanalization, additional further maneuvers on distal residual vessel occlusion (RVO) may be required. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of rescue treatment in RVOs after recanalization of large vessel occlusions in the anterior circulation., Methods: A single-center retrospective review of a prospectively maintained stroke databank was performed. Patients presenting with RVOs after mechanical thrombectomy on the M1/internal carotid artery terminus were included and further divided into treated and untreated groups: the former underwent additional maneuvers on RVOs, whereas the latter did not. Baseline and posttreatment clinical, radiologic, and angiographic data were compared between the 2 groups. End points included good functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] score ≤2) rates of hemorrhagic transformations, neurologic deterioration and mortality., Results: RVOs were observed in 183/488 patients (37.5%). 74/183 (40.4%) underwent rescue treatment, showing a better outcome in terms of median 24 hours National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score (13 vs. 18; P < 0001), 24 hours Alberta Stroke Programme Early CT Score (6 vs. 5; P < 0.001) and 3 months mRS score 0-2 (47.3% vs. 33.1%; P = 0.06). Recanalization of the superior (frontal) branch of the middle cerebral artery was particularly critical in terms of outcome. Hemorrhagic transformation was higher in the untreated group (53.6% vs. 66.6%; P = 0.1) as well as symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (13.1% vs. 29.4%; P = 0.01). Neurologic deterioration occurred more often among untreated patients (16.2% vs. 25.7%; P = 0.1). Three complications (1.3%) occurred during rescue treatment., Conclusions: When feasible, improving mTICI score 2a-2b recanalization to mTICI 2c/3 is safe and associated with a better clinical outcome, particularly for residual occlusions involving the superior branch of bifurcation., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background and Purpose: Successful reperfusion can be achieved in more than two-thirds of patients with usual large-vessel occlusion stroke causes treated with mechanical thrombectomy. However, the safety and outcomes after mechanical thrombectomy in the setting of large-vessel occlusion related to infective endocarditis is not known. In this study, we investigated the impact of mechanical thrombectomy in infective endocarditis patients on angiographic and clinical outcomes., Methods: This was a multicenter study from five comprehensive stroke centers. We compared the outcomes of mechanical thrombectomy treated stroke patients due to infective endocarditis with patients presenting atrial fibrillation. Clinical outcomes included 90-day modified Rankin Scale, symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage, and mortality., Results: Between June 2013 and March 2019, 28 patients presenting large-vessel occlusion stroke due to IE were included. These cases were matched with 84 large-vessel occlusion stroke related to atrial fibrillation. Successful reperfusion (modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction 2b/3) was obtained in 85.7%. Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, favorable outcome and mortality rates were respectively 8.0%, 25.9%, and 25.9%. In the case-control analysis, we demonstrated no difference in terms of successful reperfusion, procedural complication, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, and mortality rates. Three-month favorable outcome was less often achieved in the infective endocarditis group., Conclusions: Mechanical thrombectomy of infective endocarditis patients presents similar safety and angiographic results compared to patients suffering from atrial fibrillation.

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic led to profound changes in the organization of health care systems worldwide., Aims: We sought to measure the global impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the volumes for mechanical thrombectomy, stroke, and intracranial hemorrhage hospitalizations over a three-month period at the height of the pandemic (1 March-31 May 2020) compared with two control three-month periods (immediately preceding and one year prior)., Methods: Retrospective, observational, international study, across 6 continents, 40 countries, and 187 comprehensive stroke centers. The diagnoses were identified by their ICD-10 codes and/or classifications in stroke databases at participating centers., Results: The hospitalization volumes for any stroke, intracranial hemorrhage, and mechanical thrombectomy were 26,699, 4002, and 5191 in the three months immediately before versus 21,576, 3540, and 4533 during the first three pandemic months, representing declines of 19.2% (95%CI, -19.7 to -18.7), 11.5% (95%CI, -12.6 to -10.6), and 12.7% (95%CI, -13.6 to -11.8), respectively. The decreases were noted across centers with high, mid, and low COVID-19 hospitalization burden, and also across high, mid, and low volume stroke/mechanical thrombectomy centers. High-volume COVID-19 centers (-20.5%) had greater declines in mechanical thrombectomy volumes than mid- (-10.1%) and low-volume (-8.7%) centers (p < 0.0001). There was a 1.5% stroke rate across 54,366 COVID-19 hospitalizations. SARS-CoV-2 infection was noted in 3.9% (784/20,250) of all stroke admissions., Conclusion: The COVID-19 pandemic was associated with a global decline in the volume of overall stroke hospitalizations, mechanical thrombectomy procedures, and intracranial hemorrhage admission volumes. Despite geographic variations, these volume reductions were observed regardless of COVID-19 hospitalization burden and pre-pandemic stroke/mechanical thrombectomy volumes.

Objective: Symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH) is a common complication of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) associated with limited treatments and poor outcomes. We aimed to identify predictive factors of sICH in patients with AIS following mechanical thrombectomy (MT) in a real-world setting., Methods: Patients with large vessel occlusion of the anterior circulation treated with MT were consecutively included in a prospective monocentric cohort. Clinical, biological, and radiological parameters were collected to identify pre-procedural predictors for sICH., Results: 637 patients were included in our study. Magnetic resonance imaging was performed on most patients (86.7%). sICH occurred in 55 patients (8.6%). 428 patients (67.2%) were treated with intravenous thrombolysis. After multivariate analysis, prior use of antiplatelet therapies (odd ratio (OR) 1.84, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.01-3.32), high C-reactive protein (OR per standard deviation (SD) increase 1.28, 95% 1.01-1.63), elevated mean arterial blood pressure (OR per 10 mmHg increase 1.22, 95% CI 1.03-1.44), hyperglycemia (OR per one SD-log increase 1.38, 95% CI 1.02-1.87), and low ASPECTS (OR per 1-point decrease 1.42, 95% CI 1.12-1.80) were found to be independent predictive factors of sICH. The pre-procedural predictors did not change when the absence of successful recanalization was considered as a covariate. Patients with strokes of unknown onset time were not especially vulnerable for sICH., Conclusion: sICH after MT was associated with several pre-procedural risk factors: prior use of antiplatelet therapies, high C-reactive protein and hyperglycemia at baseline, elevated mean arterial blood pressure, and low ASPECTS.